College of Policing and Tyranny (part 2)

[@richardtheeighth4431]

This unlawful assult and tyrannical behavior committed by PC 1188 on yourself is on par with the recent atrocious assult committed by PC William Sampson on a 16 year old child. This situation appears to be racially motivated, abuse of police powers, and is totally unacceptable. It's apparent that PC 1188 got off touching you up, while it's sidekick stood idly by watching the assult unfold. This situation could have been avoided, and never should have progressed further than first contact. The gutless sidekick should have intervened, but no it was obedient and subservient to it's dominant male master. These miserable pair of unvirtuous, unethical sods are driven by their power tripping egos and have no moral compass whatsoever. Sir Auditing Britain, you prepared yourself well and can stand proud and tall. The muppets FAILED to ID you, they became annoyed and frustrated, spitting their dummies in the dirt. You gave them a well deserved and propper public lambasting, they can go to hell and hang their heads as they shuffle off on their walk of shame.

[@MikeNewland]

PC Sampson? Another sexual assault dressed up as 'investigations'?

[@maverick4220]

@@petrolhead7604 I haven't seen that video where can i find it or what do i type in to bring it up?

[@petrolhead7604]

@@maverick4220 kzbin.info/www/bejne/pIPVpWCMbc9_nrs but prepare yourself to be horrified, it's f**king brutal mate, poor kid

[@richardtheeighth4431]

@BookkeeperBill Thank you sir. No matter how uncomfortable and confronting a situation we find ourselves in, it's always a pleasure for all involved to receive your support and for the time you take to share your highly valued thoughtful opinions with others.

[@zz3OPEN]

@@richardtheeighth4431 I laughed at “16 year-old child“ though.

[@mcguire604]

This officer is DANGEROUS. He should be removed from the police service forthwith. He is a disgrace to the uniform. He had absolutely no rights to search this man whatsoever. Suspicion does not give him grounds to search this man. If he believes he has the right to search you based on terrorist activity then he has the worst judgement ever. This needs to be followed up. I applaud you for standing up to this tyrant and holding him accountable for his illegal actions.

[@kvgkumul]

You don't understand what reasonable grounds are and how easy it is to arrive at them. The courts uphold this sort of interpretation. I'm not staying it's correct I'm merely pointing out that the cops wouldn't act like this unless they were backed by the courts ...

[@kevhughes8952]

I totally agree. The man came out and said he wasn’t agressive, this coller is a disgrace to wear the badge, he has no grounds to search this man. I hope this was taken further.

[@everestmt1478]

This police need to Re-vatted 100%

[@kennyjones3679]

Another Wayne Couzens in making.

[@jackwatsonepic626]

@@kvgkumul ok " is that why A B has won all these unlawful search cases

[@publicaudituk6313]

He articulated 2 premises as grounds for search under S43: filming a sensitive site, and refusing to give details. Filming is already precluded as grounds for suspicion by the ACPO guidelines; therefore, the 1st premise is invalid. Every court in the land has agreed that refusing to give details when not obliged to cannot be used as grounds for reasonable suspicion; therefore, the 2nd premise is also invalid. In conclusion, it was false imprisonment, illegal search, and assault.

[@DEFIANT71DEFIANT]

Exactly. Well said

[@ADani-ez1ru]

Basics for drafting a Particular of Claim in a civil claim .

[@arnoldthomsen6571]

the system will never stop protecting their own cronies. we need to find the places where they live and start sending them pizzas or amazon orders every single day, every single hour. Of course, the most direct and honest solution would just be violence.

[@joe9042]

Well put. Absolutely it was. Maybe the corrupt judges who back up such potato 🥔 heads, need audited, too. Especially coming out of their sex dungeons dominatrix's place. We'd get shit done, then.

[@AdamF8]

Never tell any details to cops it gives them the right to conduct an unlawful arrest and beat people up which they actually do in this day and age, i personally wouldnt give them the time of day having been a victim myself of their bullying a couple decades ago it was downright disgusting what they did in my case

[@kaynine1958]

He actually said on camera you hadn't committed a crime...this needs to go further....these are ROGUE coppers!!!

[@paullord3549]

Have to disagree. The more of these videos I see the more I have to conclude that these are the actions of typical, not rogue coppers.

[@nomadsteve5297]

@@paullord3549 typical and rogue

[@edltommyrobinson9782]

A.B will be smiling from Ear to ear, More Cash in the bank.

[@AjahnMun]

She said the guards had not said he was aggressive.....

[@neilnewby1558]

Prevention is better than cure. Remember that

[@beesnees3758]

Cop : " Because I have the power " and that is exactly the problem and why they are hated.

[@BillKill2011]

In the country I live in, they don't like them either. The whole world doesn't like them.🌍

[@glynnsmith4560]

"Because I'm willing to abuse my power .. regardless of you pointing out the unlawful nature of my actions"

[@homemaintenance1234]

Indeed. Power hungry.

[@the72inc73]

Suspicion of terrorism yer they send two unarmed, uneducated, untrained and uninformed constables. Amazing!

[@badlarry172]

ha good point

[@TheHomeloanking]

Blue isis

[@TheHomeloanking]

@Smokeango thankyou for explaining yourself, it's nice to hear your feminine side coming out.

[@the72inc73]

@Smokeango Where are the tasers?

[@the72inc73]

@Smokeango I see no yellow tasers :-/ And how am I wrong? Even you admitted they stretched the law, to suit their agenda

[@SammyInnit]

Sue them. He broke the law by using an unlawful search.

[@rexoid0800]

He clearly knows that as he said it.

[@SammyInnit]

Gwildor saying something and doing something are two different things. Confirmation is just friendly advice but thanks for your input.

[@rexoid0800]

@@SammyInnit No problem.

[@MultiGleni]

sue them? that would be possible on a ideal world. they are corrupt as fuck and will get away with it.

[@TheJayMarsh]

@@MultiGleni Lots of people have successfully sued the police for various things, unlawful detainment and searches being one of the most popular. It's a long process, but it does happen, and often ends in people getting a 4 figure sum at the end of it.

[@James01317]

The weird thing is that millions of people every year take photos and footage of Buckingham palace which is private property The Queen doesn’t call the police at them

[@robo19-74]

And Japanese tourists versus big Ben and house of lords

[@BABYWOLF--1966]

Indeed so interesting that 🤔🤔🤔

[@michaelbrown1659]

It's not private property. Its owned by taxpayers

[@davidhunt7249]

Seriously? Cameras everywhere. The Queen doesn't have to call. Candid Camera. Smile. Your face is on file.

[@swagon4545]

@@michaelbrown1659 She owns half the wold you numnut.. She's not the queen for nothing...

[@BinnyBongBaron_AoE]

AB, I wish you'd give us updates on these lawsuits.

[@karpkatcher1070]

Very last sentence of PACE states that a person who refuses to give his detailes cannot be deemed as suspicious by police.

[@stephenrees7470]

I laugh every time when they get their notebooks out when we know full well they won't be getting any details!!

[@gruwellkranger8881]

They might be doodling🤣🤣🤣

[@NicholasAlt]

I want AB offer to model for them if they want to sketch him😀

[@Mark-hi5tq]

It to look at pictures

[@bowmanarcher1667]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@cliffordbuttle4529]

@@gruwellkranger8881there butt hurt 🤡🤪🤪

[@cammandorkeyes]

The cop literally said we’re looking for anything terrorism related but never actually says anything specific of what may be a terrorist related items

[@diamondwest35]

Well done AB. I just did research on the Thin Blue Line badge and uncovered its sordid past. Thank you for raising this and educating the public.

[@detroithustlesharder8215]

this is scary because the way these cops act when there on camera how do u think they act off camera

[@ronrogers5394]

Yes thats worrying.

What a tin pot tit before search did not say act 43 and no reasonable grounds

[@jamieco6393]

Big facts

@@MN-kp2lm they all factored in msm won't report ..check just a few out like the foi police records .library House of commons. People like Alex bellied.watching observer loads online even sky news Australia. Akkad daily .Anna brees to many to mention even Glen beck blaze tv its out there

[@todorgeorgiev3665]

No camera = u are straight convict

[@Blurry_Sights]

If the site is that much of a "Sensitive site", then why don't they have screens up covering the fences to hinder photography?

[@andidrew]

Paul Mulholland that and don’t put up a large sign at the front gate saying what the site is

[@shookoneldn300]

Better still move it to an even more remote site and build a 200 foot wall around it..😀

[@bluebottle1617]

@Paul Mulholland Exactly. And it's not a Prohibited Place within the meaning of the Official Secrets Act. either Another Common Purpose-trained plod if ever there was one.

[@DMC888]

Everyone coming and going will have to be smuggled out under a blanket.

[@jamieweldon4045]

True,,,build a wall

[@waynebence2653]

We need more people like you to keep a eye on the police

[@glennturnbull5652]

Marvelous to watch. Myself and my mates had crap like this all the time back in the day. Mobile phones and the Internet are a Godsend as people are a lot more clued up on everything nowadays and have the courage to stand up to authority. 10 out 10 again my mate. 👍

[@AuditingBritain]

🙏🏼

[@nikos-giorgos]

@@AuditingBritain When she handed you back your money you should've said: keep it, you'll need it after I sue you...

[@TommyOBrien-h9i]

If in the future you if are searched unlawfully do not accept back any of your belongings but report them as stolen from you and see how they can answer this.

[@skippyone3085]

​@@TommyOBrien-h9iwalk into the nearest police station and report a violent robbery and give them a copy of the video. Then send same copy to your MP. Engage a solicitor to write to the police complaint guys demanding an update on the officers disciplinary hearing. Lastly use the compensation to sue both officers in civil court. The have no immunity for any unlawful acts.

[@PINACI]

You handled them exactly how you should of and I really hope you do sue them for their unlawful search using the terrorism act. They didn't have reasonable grounds to suspect you are a terrorist, in order for them to have grounds they would need some kind of evidence that you are engaged in terroristic activities and being that public photography is not a crime and they had absolutely no evidence to suggest you were engaged in hostile reconnaissance the search was unlawful in my opinion, Suspicion is just an opinion and not a crime or grounds. The police cannot just walk up to people taking picture and quote the terrorism act at them in order to search them. That's like stopping a jogger and searching him because he was running down the street. They swore an oath to protect your human rights but violated them instead.

[@neiljennings1556]

i just get annoyed that this is no more than having a grumble about corrupt cops. He won the day and that was because he could not get you to identify, so he changed tactic and made it about terrorism, when will everybody learn, it is all about stamping their authority in ever encounter with the public, by the way, they cannot search you for a crime retrospectively, they only mentioned terrorism much later

[@BobMarley-nx6re]

You made need to help him.

[@marcow9979]

Once they quote the terrorism act, they leave themselves open to action. If they quote it, simply ask them to provide written and signed authorisation from an assistant chief constable or a rank above that, stating that particular geographical area had been designated as an area under threat of terrorism. Such a designation is only valid for a period of 24 hours and then needs to be reissued. If they produce such a document, obey their orders. If not and they still continue to act as these officers do, they are committing a criminal act. sue them.

[@h4ppychap]

Private Prosecution www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/private-prosecutions www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/2/section/26/enacted

[@allliecollin7965]

Right on PINACI!!!! 💕💕💕

[@WideOldDan]

When he tried to explain the grounds for the search he mentioned you failing to ID and so pretty much admitted that his intent was to violate your right to anonymity. Was anything ever done about this?

[@kvgkumul]

what is this right to anonymity you speak about ?

[@theturbo2292]

The right to refuse to give your details just because the filth would like them

[@MnemonicCarrier]

@@kvgkumul You do not have to provide your identity to a police officer just because they ask you - unless you have committed a crime. You have the right to go about your business without being harassed by the police.

[@larryforeman7157]

Yes, it is actually retaliation for not be an obedient bootlicker.

[@glennoc8585]

@@kvgkumul its default.

[@simonavery947]

It’s also ironic that this happened outside a police training college where these 2 clearly need to attend and learn how to deal with law abiding subjects of the British empire. Their attitude is disgraceful.

[@murrayp4]

I would really love an update on various cases against these people

[@Cadeaux_Man]

"We were told you were aggressive" *ADMITTING he cant discern anyone's demeanor and is therefore unfit to be a police officer*

[@beardedwarrior7023]

At 2:42 PC1461 clearly states "He's (security) just said, he said that you haven't been aggressive". At 5:55 PC1188 clearly cites a reason for the detention and search as "we've been told that you've been aggressive at this site..." This allegation had already been confirmed (by PC1461) to be a false allegation. That fact alone is reason enough to prove this to be an unlawful detention and search.

[@dotstarss]

Disgusting. Using “powers” to mend their hurt egos that you didn’t bow at their feet like a good little citizen.

[@robertstephenson5759]

Can you imagine how safe you would feel with her turning up to help you???😂😂😂

[@shropshirelado1849]

Make an official complaint these officers have abused their powers, these officers should not have done what they did. Please please make a complaint.

[@rob103rl]

Agreed. Terrorism Act, too...nice!

[@princeroncham5412]

I agree

[@QYXP]

IPCC won't do anything. Only legal actions matters to them

[@shropshirelado1849]

The complaint must be made to the Warickshire professional standards dept it is they who investigate 'procedure' complaints the IPCC only investigate the more serious incidents. In this particular incident it is all captured on video and to be honest the officers were caught abusing their powers, telling out and out lies, etc etc and I am aware of officers being sacked for less than this. The senior officers ought to be made aware of this incident so they can see for themselves what these officers said and did. Extremely unprofessional and this video should be used as a training video for other officers on "how not to do it", after all it took place outside Ryton on Dunsmore which is one of the main police training schools. Maybe they should have an hours lecture on "Public Photography " to stop this type of thing happening and educate the new recruits.

[@danhanley1313]

I find that cop suspicious of not passing a fitness test for the last 5 years at least. also that woman is a numpty.

[@danhanley1313]

@@themagicroundabout2528 😂

[@danhanley1313]

@@themagicroundabout2528 reminds me of Farva from super troopers

[@anthonyseab9166]

even his eyes are fat

[@AuditingBritain]

😂😂😂😂

[@danhanley1313]

@@AuditingBritain YO AB!

[@nigelfarage69]

PLEASE tell me you’re taking them to the county court.

[@elainethomas1238]

Well done Nigel we need to stand up against law ,if I stood outside somebody's home who takes part in fox hunting which is iligal I would be arrested plus the armed forces would most certainly turn up.

[@susand9296]

@@elainethomas1238 Nigel Farage (if this is indeed him) is pro-hunt scum.

[@johnbland3851]

I used to be pro police but this has changed my opinion.

[@homemaintenance1234]

This? What about all the other rubbish that they do every day now?

[@TheScience69]

'I decide what i do' And that attitude is the problem. They should be doing what the TAX PAYERS decide they do. Being public servants and all...

[@thefoxhat6163]

In England, Wales and N.Ireland, Police Officers are crown agents. They do what the Queen's legislation tells them to do. As it is other Crown agents who investigate, Crown agents are free to break the law and abuse their positions. In Scotland we have Constables who are public servants. They combine these duties with their duties as Crown Agents. Often they will abandon their public duty to uphold the law and commit a common law offence in order to enforce legislation. I now deduct the portion of council tax I pay for policing. I tell the council I'm not paying for a service from an organisation I believe to be corrupt. I suggest we all withdraw funding until they stop being an organised crime gang.

[@ronfrank8503]

There corporate. A corps. Until you arm yourself to prove your a man, alive! By your creditors account then they can not touch you in anyway unless you murder, steal or trespass on or against any body. Gods commandments and gave you Dominion for man on this planet. Your standing at this point is you are acting out your straw man, a corpseration. You are dead!! Lost at sea! You have no rights under maritime law. Only privileges. Fuck the crown!! They have broken all oaths against God and people

[@davesfilmingservices4377]

I'm six mins into this film and I stopped playing to write this. This pc clearly demonstrates why the police have such a bad reputation. This is pure fabrication and intimation. Shame on him. I'll watch the rest now....

[@larryforeman7157]

Yes, these two earned the hate today.

[@Arckivio]

They searched him, harassed him & bullied him for something that they still couldn't stop him from doing in the end anyway!!!!

[@lindamartinez9438]

Now that is true terrorism right there. 💯

[@kevintraynor4508]

That male officer made my blood boil what an absolute tyrant

[@spencersandmark]

Happens a lot and sadly some don't even get a reason to why they are getting searched They get away with blue murder

[@xxRit00xx]

Any follow up to this one pls

[@srdmedia2944]

it's time for some follow ups to these videos AB.. I want to see these tyrants held accountable. That would make my day!! Keep up the good work ❤

[@magsmaggie]

Top class yet again, I’m working my way through all your videos, and not once have I been disappointed, you are absolutely brilliant at what you do xxx

[@buster9102]

Mags Maggie your doing great AB is one of the best

[@Neverod8doreveN]

His behaviour was so terroristic in nature that we left him to continue after not being able to find out his name...

[@richardkestila6207]

KZbin gold auditing Britain hope this goes viral

[@ZanderEast]

I really hope you follow through on this, that tyrant needs to be stop. He’s gonna hurt somebody if he hasn’t already

[@sodthong]

They never had reasonable grounds, end of. These clowns get more pathetic by the day.

[@slingshot-sid5823]

Every blogger in the UK should pay this site a visit

[@1tommymulligan]

The power to stop and search someone under Section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000 no longer exists.

[@JustAnotherThisDJ]

It's now s43A I think and it can only apply at designated areas, or on the authority of a senior officer

[@jimbouk4131]

@Smokeango Are you the officer in this video trying to defend your unlawful actions?

[@angelcat4785]

Sue them

[@JustAnotherThisDJ]

@Smokeango I totally agree with your clearly learned point, but for the sake of argument, don't you think the crux of the case rests on what was "reasonable suspicion" I can't remember if it's an objective or subjective test, and in pretty sure there will be a seminal authority covering entirely these circumstances. I might have to research.

[@TheBILLANDERSON]

@@JustAnotherThisDJ Hello...section 47A for that designated area by not lower than rank of Inspector and to send a message to the Home secretary as soon as possible section 43A = Search of vehicles ...…………… (reasonable suspicion & grounds) section 43= Search of persons...………... (reasonable suspicion & grounds)

[@argee975]

The tyrant got butt hurt and the only way he could get petty revenge on you was to search and try to find your identity, that little girl he had with him was useless too!!! Who employs these goons???? make sure you sue them AB.

[@rob103rl]

I'm no gym-goer, but have they dropped the fitness test for police now?

[@technojoe4079]

Fitness test is so easy. The bleep test pass level is laughable.

[@dartanion0075]

Yes.when they let women in.

[@petrolhead7604]

I thought that copper would have passed the fatness test with flying colours

[@shanga7827]

Level 5 bleep test now. Used to be level 10.

[@geminirhythmspirit2573]

Yeah I believe so, on the grounds of anti discrimination, um larg ism is included,

[@steviecbf]

don't waste your time with a complaint , go straight for a lawsuit, your a slam dunk win on this 1. no grounds for a search and miss use of sec 43. you have grounds here to sue both the police and the individual

[@h4ppychap]

Private Prosecution www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/private-prosecutions www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/2/section/26/enacted

[@h4ppychap]

@@AJ-yt5rw You must be the blue costumed clown who searched him. I have came to this conclusion on the basis you make a lot of claims with no objective facts to back them up. All you have is subjective opinion, just like most blue costumed clowns!

[@steviecbf]

@@AJ-yt5rw legal activity practiced lawfully is not and can not be deemed suspicious, nor is it baiting. We have civil rights, the police enforce them. What this officer did here is unlawful. They have a SOP they are trained to follow and he wasn't interested in following it. If the police force operates like this unchecked it is nazi germany im afraid.

[@Jayen4]

@@AJ-yt5rw I'm afraid that you are completely wrong in your assessment of what happened here ! A.B. was not 'baiting' anyone . What he was doing is totally legal / lawful . Are you aware of the Met Police memo relating to photography ? This was re-iterated in ( I believe 2018) ?..... Yet these tyrants STILL behave like this ! Who gives a shit whether it's a 'sensitive' site or not ?.....The fact is that A.B. wasn't doing anything covert or threatening , therefore the fat cop was mis-using sec 43.....AND he knows he was ! Needs suing to the fullest extent possible....see if he appreciates his wrongdoing when he's hit in the pocket personally..... These moronic 'security' and especially the police bring this upon themselves......are they EVER going to learn ??

[@steviecbf]

@@AJ-yt5rw legal activity practiced lawfully can not deemed suspicious. The fact they are both legal and lawful means it can not be suspicious. In your example of 5 hours outside a home that could fall into a stalking or harassment issue but would be near impossible for police to prove the intent. Security cameras film 24 hours a day even on domestic property and they are legally allowed to. He wasn't there for that long im guessing and even if he was it is both legal and lawful to do so. Suspicious is not a crime as it is subjective

[@DanielTBoHATaG]

Is filming in public a crime? Hurt feelings isn’t the law.

[@placitas52]

Power Trip for weak minds!

[@monaghan5475]

The WPC has that expression on her face. "oh Christ he has dragged me into a situation where I am going to have to lie again to get him out of the shit"

[@Sylvia-Storm]

Hopefully she dumped him as a partner.

[@lamberko]

"It is a sensible area" - That's why they have built a nice fence - everybody can see through - instead of a tall wall. And of course nowadays the terrorists have become so lazy, they film with easily noticable cameras in their hands, standing in front of the gate, willing to provoke a chit chat with the cops. Makes perfectly sense.

[@ScaniaDronninga]

but Buckingham Palace isnt? People video and take pictures there every day.

[@silentauditor9513]

Sensible?

[@keithcrisham3951]

Jesus Christ.. I'm from Ireland 🇮🇪 and even I know they can no longer search under terrorist legislation without being able to articulate the exact suspicion of a crime

[@merlin1346]

remember, THE PROBLEM IS NOT CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE, THE PROBLEM IS CIVIL OBEDIENCE.

[@jedfra9172]

A major problem is the passing of laws that then get abused and used as an excuse for unlawful and abhorrent conduct by the 'authorities'. Do terrorists usually conduct surveillance so overtly, and then go out of their way to draw attention to themselves by being abusive to security personnel? ( I know AB wasn't abusive but that was what the jumbo sausage used as an excuse for reasonable suspicion) This video is why it should not come as a surprise that we have so many conspiracy theorists spouting false flag attack scenarios.

[@jamessparkes5516]

I like that - hope you don't mind me using it

[@merlin1346]

@@jamessparkes5516 The more that do, the better.

[@davidhunt7249]

Straight up!

[@alanmartinezrodriguez884]

So populist, so wrong. Anarchism does not work. Use reason instead.

[@MrFireblade954rr]

This officer is DANGEROUS. He should be removed from the police service forthwith. He is a disgrace to the uniform. He had absolutely no rights to search this man whatsoever. Suspicion does not give him grounds to search this man. If he believes he has the right to search you based on terrorist activity then he has the worst judgement ever.As a retired Police a Officer, even I know that you have to have more than just suspicion under the Terrorism Act. You must have strong grounds to search, not just because someone if filming. If this male had camouflage clothing and hid in a bush opposite the entrance, then yes, you have reasonable suspicion that he is a terrorist. Hope you made an official complaint, In fact, I think it took a long time for all this support from other auditors, because AB deserves this more incisive support a long time ago. I follow him since he had a little more than 2 thousand subscribers. In February he had 10k subscribers, since then he has been gaining 6k subscribers every month, this is quite impressive. It deserves all the respect and thanks of all, for fighting against tyrants who try to threaten the people's freedom.

[@ukfreedomaudits4948]

They use "suspicion" however, they forget to add the word "reasonable" before suspicion....... They had no REASONABLE suspicion, well done friend, complain

[@ukfreedomaudits4948]

@Smokeango cop loving snowflake

[@alisonbell7011]

The police always tell lies I would have sue him for saying you were a terris

[@MrSupermario21]

@Smokeango shut up you fool how can terrorism be linked to filming lol hows that reasonable? in cop shows ive watched people asked not to be filmed police respond with hes in public hes allowed.

[@MrSupermario21]

@Smokeango the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

[@MrSupermario21]

@Smokeango furthermore if you watch the video you prick hes got a cam recorder lol

[@IamtheBirmingham6]

From what I have been told from a good source this incident has become an embarrasment to the Warwickshire police.Right outside the police training college in Ryton warwickshire.

[@ancientmarine]

Good to know, I do hope AB followed this up with a civil claim for illegal detainment.

[@TheScience69]

He put handcuffs on you without reading your rights. That isnt detainment OR arrest, thats kidnapping.

[@altbergp1930]

What? You dont need to be read rights before handcuffs go on. Not to mention the fact he WAS detained.

[@MultiGleni]

false imprisonment

[@VadoVoodoo]

@@altbergp1930 Not fucking LAWFULLY detained.

[@Dazzbfc1]

That's kinky....😂😂😂

[@TheAmapoorboy]

False please look up the offence of kidnapping

[@steveduncan9256]

Is there any updates on this illegal detainment

[@richardcoleman4103]

These muppets are a disgrace, there actions are totally unprofessional.

[@richardcoleman4103]

@Daniel O'Sullivan predictive text, too much time on your hands, get a grip.

[@dantaylor7344]

Like 95% of the fuzz

[@abileat1494]

What's "fuzz" it reminds me of the movie 'hot fuzz" ?

[@Nullabore]

The only reason they searched you was to obtain your identity

[@lawfulcorruption]

One reason never to carry it.

[@NewsNowScotland]

Bang on mate.. Search didn't take too long did it? Wonder if that's because he couldn't find your wallet lol.. Only thing he was looking for was ID

[@Just-Dave-]

It’s all bullshit

[@JoannaHammond]

Agree

[@travellingtom6091]

Definitely. The trouble with the police (well most humans), is that their egos prevent them from admitting they are wrong. They have to 'win' ahead of actually doing the right thing. He obviously searched you to obtain power over you. It's like when traffic cops stop someone mistakenly and have to find something trivial wrong with your car just to keep face.

[@gw9167]

I was being aggressive to who? There isn't anybody here! Just cows and a lamppost! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Comedy GOLD 😂😂😂😂

[@pubtalkpubtalk651]

Garry Wormington just like Alan Partridge.

[@brijmistry]

Have you had any success with suing the officers? Thanks

[@mauricio6614]

Awesome. In fact, I think it took a long time for all this support from other auditors, because AB deserves this more incisive support a long time ago. I follow him since he had a little more than 2 thousand subscribers. In February he had 10k subscribers, since then he has been gaining 6k subscribers every month, this is quite impressive. It deserves all the respect and thanks of all, for fighting against tyrants who try to threaten the people's freedom.

[@jamesmackenzie9837]

I'm very happy that ab makes these videos. Aswell as crime bodge. It's given me a better understanding of unlawful actions. Thank you good sirs

[@keithlane4705]

What a pair of bullies these two are, sad they don't recognise the reason for their powers and use them accordingly in the situation they are meant for.

[@jasb6804]

Another great educational upload Ab. Hope you went back again again. Well done.

[@Di-mx6tj]

This policeman is stepping up with his ego I am surprised at the way he’s dressed addressing members of the public he’s had too many doughnuts

[@smokemirrors8509]

This is a job for "Crimebodge"!Rob loves dealing with this stuff,,,,,!

[@scottishwarrior8014]

Smoke & Mirrors crimebodge will have a hard on way this video 🤪

[@spongebob358]

Gotta love the Bodge!

[@benjiviews4300]

"Do the search record, I'm going to continue recording!" Brilliant!

[@kenthall319]

Please publish the outcome. Did you sue?

[@dubmundo2280]

AB you're the man. Pigs sure do abuse their power on all continents. Thanks for exposing these tyrants. You're videos put a smile on my face.

[@mixedmitchell9178]

"There's cows over there!" 🤣🤣🤣

[@diogofigueiredo6435]

Did you sue them at least? Is there any outcome from this sue?

[@mauricio6614]

Almost 100% of the channel’s content is him being kind, argumentative and nice to police who try to infringe on his rights. Then when he refuses to have his rights raped he is unduly detained and searched for no reason. So far so good, but when he rightly threatens to sue these tyrannical pigs to teach them a lesson and set an example for the other tyrannical pigs, and he leaves it alone and does not sue anyone, it does the opposite. Police officers gain even more confidence to continue tyranny.

[@EmilyRose0]

I follow A LOT of american auditors. They sometimes win but they have to sign NDAs and its almost never get public what they get. They ALWAYS SETTLE OUT OF court, the state just has to dangle money on front of them and the taxpayers pay for the cops wrongdoings and they get a few days of payed vacation as a thanks for violating peoples rights. There are also LOT of empty threads, and auditors just never suing. I do not know about the UK laws and how it works but I bet he actually never sued because he just want to make money on youtube, does not want to risk the lawyer money ... my guess is there is actually some tyrannical law on the UK that allows them to do this and claim that suspicion is justified in this case. I hate this about auditing. I would be happier if they would sue, lose and TELL ABOUT IT rather then this BS. Watched so many videos where the audience wants to know what happens and the anditors never answer ...

[@ellisjames8517]

When they talking at the end they probably thinking we might if made a mistake and could be getting into trouble 😂😂

[@SHINKSMAIN]

You want to make a request for the person who falsely said you was aggressive..

[@Jafmanz]

a request for the person? ''hello I'd like to request that person please'' '';yes sir where shall we deliver him?''

[@Jafmanz]

@Symon's jaspers & Agates cut and polish its probably called hearsay but that was close enough.

[@Jafmanz]

@Symon's jaspers & Agates cut and polish what an original and particular name you have too ☺

[@waynebrocklehurst1768]

The female officer came back and said he wasn't being aggressive by the security, so was it the male officer making it up! can you obtain the police call?

[@TheGordybear]

Actually as the female officer said"multiple reports"

[@B166ER68]

Sure they need to have authorization from a senior officer to search you under the terrorism act. Contact Crimebodge. Sue them. Good luck. Great video.

[@MrStaffy01]

47A needs authorisation not 43

[@mal6232]

@@MrStaffy01 He never indicates which section he is detaining AB under...that was a mistake on AB's part, he should have requested the section and gone from there. As you say, 47 requires a senior police officers say-so and 43 requires the search be halted if a reasonable reason for the actions of the individual is presented to the officer... 3.4.9. If, as a result of questioning before a search, or because of other circumstances which come to the attention of the officer, there cease to be reasonable grounds for suspecting that the person is a terrorist or the vehicle is being used for the purposes of terrorism, the officer may not conduct a search under section 43 or 43A. In the absence of any other lawful power to search or detain, the person is free to leave at will at that stage and must be so informed.

[@leegrant1800]

Do not see them as police officers but sue them as human beings. It's a lot more satisfying.

[@enigma.records6783]

Human is a fiction. The color of Man. As statutes are the color of law.

[@atitnac598]

Any update would be greatly appreciated - Thanks.

[@Itisfinished.]

Press charges 100%,,your case is open and shut via the video evidence,,so many laws and policies broken there bro.

[@edwarddaniels1741]

OMG!!! He found papers with the Queen's Name on it. He said that that would be evidence of terrorism and he missed it!

[@stevocraig3527]

Ha ha detained for terrorism just for filming 😂😂 do they make offensives up as they go along

[@petrolhead7604]

@Smokeango I wouldn't think a determined terrorist would go and stand openly in front of a police building knowing they would be challenged, they would use subterfuge and not get themselves noticed, not stand in the open chatting to various officials. Have a think before you start hurling insults, you have made yourself look a right plank, and that's after you have edited your comment, pmsl

[@lawfulcorruption]

@Emptiness Form i THINK , using a bit of common and gut feeling that terrorists do their work covertly and not in the open during the day.so this is like the war on drugs.. install fear into the population and divide for control.

[@TheScience69]

They use the terrorism act as an excuse. It means 'if i say this i can do what i want because i was preventing terrorism'. Then the papers report an increase in terrorism, even though most of it is just police abusing their power and finding nothing

[@harrylindsay6448]

I really like that you continually reiterate that this isn't what they signed up to do, that it was illegal and that you'd sue them. They were crapping themselves at the end. Fact is a superior had ordered them to use section 43 to search him and like puppets they just followed orders, the male cop at least knew he'd done wrong.

[@apk74]

They totally profiled you! ‘Foreign’ accent + ignorant officers = they go into panic mode....

[@pacmanghostdude5227]

Yes that is exactly what they did.

[@apk74]

@Sh3p 83 very true

[@kevintraynor4508]

I found this one a little upsetting. Having been searched by the police myself I know exactly how it feels.

[@unknownranger250]

I’ve been stopped by the same two officers atleast 5 times and feel harassed by them, complained to IOPC who obviously they took the officers side. I sit in my car after a workout, how does that give grounds to follow me and watch me like a hawk whilst i drink a protein shake? disgusting officers

[@vintagerecordambassadeur4098]

I love being searched. Thoroughly searched if you know what I mean. Maybe I’m hiding something there, you never know

[@dawnwindrush4234]

My documentary is about whether cops are slightly smarter than plant life

[@stevehurrell]

You will struggle there

[@dopeytripod]

WEEDS are smarter

[@MsGolf987]

Well there a Damsite cleverer than most of the people commenting on this video

[@britbyname3620]

@@MsGolf987 but not you ....check your spelling !

[@MsGolf987]

@@britbyname3620 Well I’ve got dyslexia you know what I meant

[@marcbrugatmercadal4676]

I enjoy a lot watching tath! Every night to sleep… i love it

[@simplifygardening]

Did you sue them for this after?

[@camburider8744]

Na he’s just a gob sh1t3 that gets angry.

[@stu0508]

@@camburider8744 The irony of your comment, lol.

[@erikbostrom.9318]

If he says, "i will sue" , then he needs to sue.

[@xkeyscore1120]

Sorry mate you're an idot...you got searched 😆😆😆

[@sausagembape677]

Please say you sued them

[@cjh160159]

As a retired Police a Officer, even I know that you have to have more than just suspicion under the Terrorism Act. You must have strong grounds to search, not just because someone if filming. If this male had camouflage clothing and hid in a bush opposite the entrance, then yes, you have reasonable suspicion that he is a terrorist. Hope you made an official complaint, if in fact it got anywhere at the end of the day.

[@robertwalker1863]

AB There may be grounds for a law suit contact crimebodge.com for help and assistance

[@Triggered1964]

@Bear PhantomCrimbodge told us on vid! plus this audit is not outrageous or violent Congratulations goes to Auditing Britain for a very well handled interaction when confronted with sec43 and pushy plod

[@h4ppychap]

Private Prosecution www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/private-prosecutions www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/2/section/26/enacted

[@steveknight8046]

So he can sell him an ebook?? Lol!

[@TheBrawlBox]

@@steveknight8046 😂👍

[@byronelenica8329]

AB you were outstanding. Brilliant. Excellent.

[@thisisaker2114]

Done well mate, just sue the shit out of em

[@hectichazerdus]

yeah and make the taxpayer front the bill. the police have no accountability

[@dwainmcwilliams2043]

Those are imports tyrants trained by the NYPD.

[@AlexHGV]

The police payouts come from insurance. We the tax payer pay the premiums.

[@GavTatu]

until it comes out of their wage packet or budget, they wont care.

[@sirveillance9080]

Sue the man not the badge.

[@Simon-Smith.]

Absolute thuggery, these officers should be in front of a judge.

[@HeinrichDixon]

'Give me your details! No! TERRORIST!' An all-too-common scenario. If this criminal genuinely thought you were a terrorist BEFORE his illegal search, exactly what was it that allayed his fears AFTER he had carried out his illegal search? The fact that this petty bully was satisfied that you were not a "terrorist" after illegally searching you and finding NOTHING proves that he never actually suspected you in the first place. You - legally and rightly - said "No" to him and he didn't like that, so he suddenly played the terrorism card in order to get your ID. When that failed the lying little shit knew he was beaten, so stopped trying. An HONEST suspicion with nothing useful either way found in a search would have lead to arrest and further investigations to establish your identity. Please, PLEASE, follow up on your threat to sue them. Contacting CRIMEBODGE would be a great first step. Keep up the good work. 🍌👍

[@TheHookahSmokingCaterpillar]

"People lie to us all the time ", but he was still will to take the word of the security guard that AB had been agressive.

[@jackeck2128]

Omg my blood is boiling what a pair of unprofessional goons

[@jamessparkes5516]

yeah, I got angry watching this

[@dopeytripod]

@@jamessparkes5516 i bet they BOTH have gotten raises & promotions since this video

[@sparkonthehorizon]

Dude, first time viewer from the states and your auditing skills are spot-on! Will be subbing and looking for more of your work!

[@ArthurDentsTowel]

"Evidence of terrorism." £33, a phone and a camera.

[@shookoneldn300]

Ford Prefect 😂😂😂

[@TheScience69]

He might of had a piece of paper with a list of names and "these are my terrorist friends' written at the top, as the officer very clearly explained. It makes PERFECT sense

[@AuditingBritain]

You counted my cash ? 😂😂😂

[@ArthurDentsTowel]

@@AuditingBritain

[@thefoxhat6163]

@@AuditingBritain £33?? Are you a Freemason?

[@melwebb8485]

Just seen this so what happened next did you lodge a complaint.

[@grimprawn902]

Oooh, get back in that College now and learn the law!

[@shookoneldn300]

Grim Prawn The auditor should have told the officer acting like a criminal that!😂😂😂

[@andygray4418]

Auditing Britain: "you're not honouring your oath now" Policeman: "what's that?"

[@derektrotter4287]

I’m sure he was an extra at the blue oyster bar in police academy 1😂👮‍♀️ handle bar moustache = gay biker

[@bastiaanheijmans]

One thing is appreciated: officer agrees recording to continue while searching.

[@davidbawden6567]

Well done sir, for standing up for our rights..

[@dagg65]

This’ll be a big payout for you, they really should have known better. I can’t believe that they have used sec 43

[@JoannaHammond]

It's the UK, there are no really big payouts. It's all token payments.

[@JoannaHammond]

@@mfrost71w Yeah, pittance compared to the US :(

[@michelleainge7753]

Mark Frost it would be about £500...

[@elgrin_red]

I do love these videos, but in these cases where they've clearly over stepped by a long way, it would be nice to know if you followed up on your threat and did something about it. A little feedback would nice. Keep up the good work. I've learnt a lot from you. 😊👍