Avengers Kang Dynasty CANCELLED Entire PLOT LEAK! INSANE ENDING Sets Up Secret Wars THE END

[@Warstu]

Legit Or *Not* Back To Back *Marvel* Video Please Like The Video I Tried At LEAST Can *Deadpool3* Save The MCU? Please Follow My Instagram Here ► instagram.com/warstu Support The Channel By Become A Channel Member Here ►www.youtube.com/@Warstu/membership Let’s Talk Below

[@michealrosen]

The leak of this script doesn't sound good imo

[@darthoblivion2615]

The biggest problems with "the Kang Dynasty" is that it's based on Kang, one of the lamest characters in all of Marvel. That and the fact that Majors is one of the worst actors I've ever had the misfortune of watching. His over-acting was so cringe it was difficult to watch his scenes. F Kang, bring on Doom!

[@TGOSE-v7y]

They Just Mixed It

[@B.Ch3rry]

The only reason they fired Kang is because Ant-Man 3 was a bust... Had it did close to a billion, they would've sweep J. Major's dilemma under the rug and proceeded.

[@NIGHTGUYRYAN]

...okay

[@prestoncantler6445]

I think Kang was pretty good. I think Jonathon Majors got his name dragged through the mud over something that wasn’t as we know it. I’m not dismissing his issues with his partner at the time. But with her trying to take back what she said I believe she guilty too.

[@Byronic19134]

Correct that entire issue should have never even went to court.

[@Dreadpoolz3977]

Dismiss what issues, dude literally ran from here. She was clearly the aggressor

[@michaeldamico3000]

Stuart Stuart….man I wanted Kang Dynasty to just be called Kang Dynasty and make it a Kang Origin Story, from his birth to discovering the multiverse, Ramatut, Scarlet Centurian/Iron Lad , Immortus, multiversal war, creation of TVA, to He Who Remains death, to the Council of Kang, to the exiled one unaliving “the one with the Hammer”….starring Jonathan Majors

[@Ultriac301]

So, Kang Dynasty would have been based on the " Time Runs Out " storyline but instead of the Beyonders, the main antagonists would have been the Council Of Kangs and Thor, Hyperion, Starbrand, e.t.c. would have been replaced by the movie characters of the past.

[@iNKdUpYsl]

This movie plot for Kang Dynasty would've been epic 🔥

[@Steven_Edwards]

Does anyone remember how much shit RDJ was in to? He had to get Mel Freaking Gibson to bond him for Iron Man because no one would insure him. That may be what it really comes down to. If Majors can't get the high dollar insurance for the movie, they can't use him.

[@darthoblivion2615]

Majors is a terrible actor. His overacting is unbearably cringe. Good riddance!

[@Byronic19134]

@@darthoblivion2615Said no one ever.

[@darthoblivion2615]

@@Byronic19134 omg! Cope a little more

[@ManG1aze]

​@darthoblivion2615 that's why he fits at least the Kang role extremely well, Kang has always been over-the-top.

[@ManG1aze]

​@@darthoblivion2615I'll admit I don't like his other material. But Kang? Perfect casting for him.

[@The_Infamous_Boogyman]

I'm no cruise fan, but having superior iron man theories turn out to be Monica rambeau was a huge disappointment.

[@Timothy_D_S]

It’s the Disney way. Disappointing every true fan.

[@user-ik7lz3pl8q]

Jonathan Majors told TMZ that he is "heartbroken" by the news that Robert Downey Jr.'s Doctor Doom will be the new villain of the next two "Avengers" movies, effectively replacing Majors' Kang the Conquerer. Marvel fired Majors in December, the same day he was found guilty of two misdemeanor counts of harassment and assault. His villain, Kang, was created as the new Thanos of the Marvel Cinematic Universe and would feature prominently in "Avengers: The Kang Dynasty," which has now been scrapped and replaced by "Avengers: Doomsday," starring Downey. “Yes, heartbroken. Of course,” Majors responded when TMZ asked if he was hurt by the new direction Marvel was taking. “I love Kang. However, Doctor Doom is evil.” TMZ later noted that Downey was being given the opportunity to lead more Marvel films despite his own history of legal troubles. Downey was arrested in 1996 for possession of heroin, cocaine and an unloaded gun and received three years of probation. He faced many other legal problems in the years that followed, causing some Marvel executives to worry about casting him as Tony Stark in 2008's "Iron Man." "I think it's only fair that Mr. Downey has been met with patience, curiosity and love... and that he will be allowed to work [his] art and be creative at that level," Majors said of how Downey was given a return despite the legal problems. "I didn't really understand that." Would Majors want to return to the MCU as Kang? "Hell yes! Hell yes! I love it. I love Kang," he said. "If that's what the fans want and that's what Marvel wants, then let's move on. Hell yes."

[@NIGHTGUYRYAN]

are you just a bot that posts this everywhere? because its over. kangs over. move on bro

[@user-ik7lz3pl8q]

@@NIGHTGUYRYAN Well, what do you care about? I love Jonathan Majors is great as Kang the Conqueror, He Who Remains, Victor Timely, Immortus, Rama Tut, Scarlet Centurion and all their variants. And also as an actor

[@ThomasBrownRant]

Imagine Denzel being hired as Immortus and his son, John David playing Kang.

[@Itssheed]

How bou justt Jonathan Majors just finish job... How bout that

[@Byronic19134]

@6:28 Yes the fans cried themselves outta an epic movie you are correct with the whole “Kang was beat by ants lie.” Which was not true and needed to happen to push the events of Kang Dynasty in motion and set up his redemption arc.

[@Itssheed]

Right... He wasn't actually defeated by ant.

[@robertmclellan154]

I've watched Quantumania 11x. It's my most watched mcu movie. Love Kang. It could have been saved by adding to 1 line of Janet describing Kang to Hank and Hope. "Down here he is too powerful. I couldn't beat him. If he gets out he will be able to control time again and will be unstoppable".

[@Dubzero946]

Kang should have killed Ant-Man and Hank Pym in the first 10 minutes of " Quantummainia ". That's the version we NEEDED. Marvel nerfd his arrival. 🤦🏻‍♂️

[@Byronic19134]

Did you even pay attention? The exiled one was never supposed to be the bad Kang to begin with, but show even the “good” Kang is still a monster.

[@Dubzero946]

@@Byronic19134 nah bro. That's why nobody was on board with it. You can't beat Kang with a bunch of Ants. He was soft ASF 😅😭

[@benhemmerling644]

I was just called a "Bitch" by Josh from Den of Nerds for wanting what you just read, and being a Kang fan. ...I really want to fight, and need a plane ticket.

[@Byronic19134]

😂😂😂 Dude he was joking

[@jonathon862]

Josh has never read an Avengers comic that wasn't written by Brian Michael Bendis or Jonathan Hickman. He has no reference for Kang, because he has limited comic book knowledge.

[@LeViz101]

I think The OG Black Panther should be the original anchor being for Earth 616 since Chadwick Boseman passed away.

[@jarredjenkins8054]

RDJ has been to jail and has an enormous past of crime and scandals , double standard

[@EstebanC-jh9mj]

For drug addiction.. which he overcame and had to climb back up into the industry to get where he is now

[@carlgibson285]

The idea of anchor beings is a bit dumb TBH. If the universe needs an anchor being to exist, then why didn't the universe die before the anchor being was born? Wolverine was only alive for 200 years, so what was keeping his universe alive for the 5 billion years before he existed?

[@HonestJohn_01.19]

Marvel wouldn't make Spider-Man the anchor being of the MCU, period. He's a Sony property. They don't have full-control over his character, they wouldn't base the existence of their entire cinematic Universe on one of the few characters left that they still don't actually own. If the MCU has an "Anchor Being" (A plot-device highly speculated to just be the result of rewrites following Jonathon Majors' termination, and thus a narratve one-off essentially exclusive to Deadpool & Wolverine-- ultimately inconsequential to the larger Multiversal Saga, and the various other MCU titles therein) than it's obviously Iron Man. Especially, since "Anchor Beings" are practically synonymous with the "Star" of each respective Universe. Which, explains the ending for ""Deadpool & Wolverine" heavily-suggesting that Earth-10,005's Deaadpool, and the "Worst" Wolverrine effectively replaced the original "Logan" as Earth-10,005's "Anchor Being" (Now, Anchor BEINGS) following the events of the film's climax. Thus, likewise cementing them as Earth-10,005's "Co-Stars" (Formerly, Star) in the prrocess.

[@user-sx5fn8yo5s]

Theres two logans at that point deadpool is not an anchor . Thats why the timeline was saved because a second logan steps in when the original dies in 2029

[@gregorygriffinjr3648]

Marvel is giving you want you want instead of sticking to the plan and now u hate where u heading 😂

[@Byronic19134]

I also like how Marvel is intentionally leaking the Kang plots to let people know they originally were cooking still but people started crying so much they had no choice but to change course.

[@JunkieRemix]

People are upset because this isn’t how we wanted it, Doom needs his own saga to fully flesh his story out. This is to late of an introduction, it’s like if Galactus was introduced in Captain Marvel so he could also be a big bad in Endgame. JM’s Kang was so good despite what you think about Ant-Man 3, his interpretation of HWR, Victor and Kang himself was just perfect but because what happened, his career completely got ruined and replaced

[@gooze4244]

The issue was that the mcu was looking real bad then we finally got a character that was good only for the law to say he used too much force in self defense 😂 and running to protect himself. Now we got a pop up movie with a character we love but how did we get here. Also Ezra miller is stop running free

[@Ultriac301]

​@@Byronic19134 What " cooking" are you talking about? GettingTobey's Spidey and Hugh's Wolverine killed by the variants of a lame c-list villain who jobbed to Ant-Man?

[@jonathon862]

I never wanted Doctor Doom. I was happy that Kang was getting the stage he deserved, as arguably the Avengers arch-enemy.

[@kay9ine_two268]

Disney/Marvel. Dropped the ball with majors

[@stevendchu]

What I'm still interested in was how was He Who Remains and Alioth originally supposed to be involved? To me he was the most interesting of the variants.

[@timcollins2488]

This movie sounds epic! It's too bad they are no longer doing it!

[@gregorygriffinjr3648]

I told all y'all this years ago but y'all so gun hole on cameos cameos cameos so marvel gave you what you want and now you hate it😂😂😂

[@jonofarrell9249]

Think its funny how literally every single time something like this happens, its always a pipe dream... I mean think about it of course they can make anything sound good now that it's not being made...always happens

[@darrinharvey3384]

So basically it’s Infinity War again … where they fail and have to repair it in the next movie … nah … Gotta do something different

[@darth_uchiha8853]

Bro the disrespect to your credibility is crazy for your channel to be so small it’s crazy you literally have leaks years before they come out and you get no love but I’m giving I’ll your flowers bro 🤞🏾🙌🏾

[@chexrnsfica]

The. Can do like they did in dr strange 2 MOM because they paying RDJ the bag he probably have a cgi moment where he has to be dr doom and iron man talking to each other that’s going to be weird tho 🤔

[@goats_born_in_august1]

We all know why majors not coming back

[@virtualrealityfitness283]

Read Avengers Forever Kang works with the Avengers to defeat the time keepers!

[@jonathon862]

Avengers Forever > Jonathan Hickman's Secret Wars. I said what I said.

[@michealrosen]

Nobody cares for Kang,they failed on Kang, he appears in Loki and he's beaten by antman, it makes Kang look weak.

[@halfadozen6]

Speak for yourself. I loved Kang. He was a multi layered villain. He was NEVER defeated by Ant-Man. He was maybe trampled by hundreds of thousands of sentient technologically enhanced Ants. But his plan was ultimately just delayed, there was no defeat. Watch the film again…

[@virtualrealityfitness283]

I love Kang in the comics!

[@Byronic19134]

Yes he appears in Loki as the guy literally controlling and manipulating events throughout history at the end of time. How is that weak? He apppears in Antman and is pushed into his multiversal engine which was something that had to happen to push the story forward with the Council and set up his arc for redemption. It all had a purpose.

[@bestlexluthor7596]

I don’t understand this variant thing at all just to say “ hey look it’s Tom cruise of hevry Cavill’”. I just don’t get the point just to show a different actor .

[@Byronic19134]

Showing a different actor is a visual representation of the character having completely different personalities and just mixes it up for the viewer to help it easier to keep track of.

[@darth_uchiha8853]

Cause he black and cause it’s Disney

[@Byronic19134]

The DEI Kingdom you are saying who originally signed the guy to play every variant and be the over arching villain after just seeing initial set footage fired him for being Black? You see how stupid you sound?

[@tha1stalchemist]

*Vader breathez heavy* spiderman/madam web ONLY exist ta explain tha multiverse... think about it... who watchez over MULTIPLE universez??? Trick question... dr strange watchez from tha shadowz wit clea... BUT fantastic 4 r tha guardianz ah tha multiverse... guess who dr strange introduced spidey 2 after MULTIPLE avengerz told spidey he 2 immature ta be on ANY serious team... now guess who LEADZ tha fantastic 4 in 2099... spidey dr strange n tha fantastic 4 watch tha multiverse... spidey just in his neighborhood on standby while strange explorez all outcomez in ah pocket dimension... then fantastic 4 n antman assist watchin tha multiverse... guardianz ah tha galaxy tha marvelz n thor watch space... side team bein hulk n his children tha valkariez adam warlock n silver surfer... xmen n tha tva watch tha timeline... ironic considerin they fuck up tha timeline more than loki... tha avengerz watch earth in general... consider tha mcu team... black panther namor cap falcon winter soldier... tha midnight sunz (tha serial killerz in marvel) watch tha ethereal plane ah earth... ppl like tha cast we saw on screen in deadpool n wolverine basically show this az well wit tha team bein tha more HARDENED heroez like blade deadpool wolverine gambit electra johnny storm n even ah few we havent seen in tha same room such az magneto ghost rider dr strange wanda ironman hulk punisher shang-chi luke cage n ah few otherz... *Vader breathez heavy*

[@432hzz]

all of this majors bullshit ruined marvels comeback ngl

[@David-xy2ly]

I’ve just lost all interest in marvel absolutely sick of terrible movies and series. Don’t think I will ever go back to watch movie at cinema

[@gregorygriffinjr3648]

Marvels fans robbed themselves 😂😂oh it dont connect😂😂😂 massive L for u marvels fans

[@danielzamorabaudrit1278]

This guy's voice is annoying

[@herbaldragon7646]

If marvel brings TC into the mix I'm 100% done with MCU,that guy is a POS.

[@HonestJohn_01.19]

Marvel wouldn't make Spider-Man the anchor being of the MCU, period. He's a Sony property. They don't have full-control over his character, they wouldn't base the existence of their entire cinematic Universe on one of the few characters left that they still don't actually own. If the MCU has an "Anchor Being" (A plot-device highly speculated to just be the result of rewrites following Jonathon Majors' termination, and thus a narratve one-off essentially exclusive to Deadpool & Wolverine-- ultimately inconsequential to the larger Multiversal Saga, and the various other MCU titles therein) than it's obviously Iron Man. Especially, since "Anchor Beings" are practically synonymous with the "Star" of each respective Universe. Which, explains the ending for ""Deadpool & Wolverine" heavily-suggesting that Earth-10,005's Deaadpool, and the "Worst" Wolverrine effectively replaced the original "Logan" as Earth-10,005's "Anchor Being" (Now, Anchor BEINGS) following the events of the film's climax. Thus, likewise cementing them as Earth-10,005's "Co-Stars" (Formerly, Star) in the prrocess.