CANCELLED| Avengers: Kang Dynasty Entire Plot LEAK

[@elloowu6293]

Tony Stark was 616's anchor being. Just look at the MCU after he died. 😮

[@samkochel6990]

Great comments and sick burn!

[@tobbogun9420]

It’s Doctor Strange

[@marlongaines9319]

Wolverine was the anchor being not iron man

[@elloowu6293]

@marlongaines9319 not in the mcu.

[@thedon0516]

IMO, I think Victor Von Doom should've BEEN introduced in earlier MCU film and should've been built up and teased for years just like they did Thanos

[@TheJKX86]

Honestly that's what made thanos so amazing. The years of building and fleshing out what he was up too.

[@artri3]

that was what i was looking for, and IMO they shouldve kept the casting for Victor Doom in secret and not known to us all that it is RDJ playing Doom. And have that build up of his character then theres a reveal in the movie who he is

[@TyRave]

He supposedly was back in BP2's development, but then Chadwick passed and they scrapped it.

[@eastynlanier4560]

they were doing that for Kang. I hate this new direction

[@DogInATaco]

Yeah but Marvel and Disney are a bunch of money hungry dipshits now, and seemingly can't even realize what made the first 3 phases of Marvel so successful. They really seem to want to not spend money on their cake, but eat it too. They don't give enough time, budget, or care to any of the products they've been making recently. They're really just throwing shit at the wall trying to find something that sticks. We've had like 2 or 3 good movies since End Game, and all of them gave almost complete creative control to people that actually cared about the product. Big shock, all grossed over a *BILLION* dollars. But it seems like they STILL can't put together that "good product = money"

[@49Shadow]

If Marvel can recast Warmachine and Hulk back then, Why they can't do it again?

[@Imwraz.]

I think majors had suin in his contract saying only he could be kang so marvel literally fucked themself firing him

[@Napoleonic_S]

to be fair, I think Kang is just too obscure and his debut (or multiple debuts, if we have to include the tv shows) were unconvincing after what we had in Thanos... Doom would've been great if only they didn't bring RDJ back specifically for that character.

[@strykrpinoy]

@@Napoleonic_S LOL at Kang being obscure.

[@ye87]

Why should he even be recast

[@Imwraz.]

@@ye87 he shouldn’t they should hire majors back. Win for everyone

[@iamme4494]

UNTIL YOU’RE 90!!!!

[@FeetFart6262]

well hello iamme4484, your gyatt is undeniably huge, can i take a peak?

[@Idevaughan530]

Ryan Reynolds Hugh jackman and Tom holland will play these characters until they are 90

[@nathanstranges]

Robert Downey Jr. played blackface in Tropic Thunder……just have him play Kang and keep the same story 😂

[@NathanEall]

“For 400 years, the avengers has been holding us down!”

[@KerioFive]

I wanna live in that universe

[@gregwhite7852]

NOW THATS F**KIN' FUNNY!!!!!!!!🤣😂

[@SamUHells]

@@NathanEall😂😂

[@raymonreiz]

alternate version of Stark that became Kang 🤣🤣🤣

[@Galvatron_Studios]

I’m not angry that Doctor Doom is coming to the MCU or that RDJ is playing him. I’m angry that Marvel made the decision to completely write Kang out of the MCU and pretend he never happened. They could easily recast him or shorten his role in the MCU. It's not that hard. They could easily squeeze the rest of his story in What If and make his variants the villains for a few episodes. They could also just recast him and make him Doctor Doom’s partner in Avengers Doomsday and then Doom betrays Kang. I really hope Marvel reconsiders this decision and they keep Kang around because there are actually a lot of us who are interested in the character. Marvel should just hire me. I guarantee I can wrap this story up for them and save them the headache of shifting all of their plans around. Now I *KNOW* Doctor Doom will be ruined because of these changes. There's no time to build him up. Doctor Doom needs his own saga and there's just not enough for him to do in the Multiverse Saga.

[@ZaOnly420]

They can easily wait and recast later it's not that serious dude .

[@Galvatron_Studios]

@@ZaOnly420 that's the problem. They won’t wait and they won’t recast. Hollywood doesn’t know how to separate a fictional character and an actor.

[@WestCoastCheeseHead]

They didn’t write him out of the MCU they’ll probably do it like in the 2015 secret wars doom kills Kang like he did thanos

[@Galvatron_Studios]

@@WestCoastCheeseHead yeah if they didn’t write him out then they wouldn’t have made the TVA monitor the timeline and prune any Kang variant in sight

[@nealsmall9316]

​@@Galvatron_StudiosAnd Robert Downey Jr made more mistakes than Jonathan majors in his personal life when he was younger

[@deathsyth8888]

They had an in-universe explanation as to why Kang would have been recast as another variant(s) and no one would have batted an eye and yet they decided to completely re-tool their entire plan or severely cut short their original storyline to create an alternate one to shoehorn Doctor Doom instead of having his own path into Secret Wars with either the Fantastic Four movie or in different related Marvel movie.

[@taylorlarkin623]

it seems like they still havent decided if they want variants to look the same or different, i feel like its somethign that needs to be mentioned, maybe im thinking too hard about it. idk. but strange gets clones, wolverine gets partial clones, spider man gets no clones and is always a different character/gender/race, Etc. its confusing

[@boyananakiev4896]

Cuz they couldn't give 2 shits if majors did something or was cancelled, the reality was his kanga story was bad, no one gave a shit about it, the build up was in shows and a movie almost no one but die hard marvel fans watched and they are super scared they will lose billions of dollars going with this plan and given the flop that is phase 4, so majors being cancelled was the perfect moment for them to wash their hands and bring in the cash cow character everyone knows and rdj, they reek of fear of losing money

[@dlangley49]

They're not shoe horning dr doom in they're shoe horning RDJ in to make sure their movie makes money

[@boyananakiev4896]

@@dlangley49 they're doing both, otherwise they couldve made rdj play kang as a recast or some other unkown villain to the masses. They're scared shitless to fail after phase 4 and will do whatever is most secure to guarantee ROI. What better way to do that than to replace an unknown not well received villain with a VERY well known villain that everyone has been waiting for to be justice on the screen.. on top of that played by RDJ.

[@shoaibxperiaplay]

So the Loki series was all for nothing. 😒

[@Redsnowman04]

😂

[@themanfromtimeforgotten]

Look that way..

[@AdrianMeredith]

Well that was obvious from the massive retcon from the season 1 cliff hanger. It's clear that season 2 was not meant to be like that

[@live2die261]

Na doom can still run the tva even take Lokis powers

[@513hook513]

Absolutely not. Go watch Deadpool and Wolverine

[@ultronicon6467]

Kang would literally be the easiest character to recast I mean all they had to do was go “oh, somebody tried to make him not be born but it didn’t work so now his genetics are slightly different” and I guarantee you it would make perfect (comic book logic) sense

[@U.Gwen.Poole616]

Yea and hes black so who cares no one can tell the difference anyways

[@theebonymaw]

the anchor being thing doesn't make sense in the first place, but definitely not if it's passed down. if there was always a new anchor being after an earlier one died, then their universe would never die out.

[@yami122]

And if the universe does die out when there die time wouldn't really exist in any meaningful way as reality is would only be capable of lasting only a relatively small amount of time longer than the lifespan of a single person Maybe 1000 years longer than that person which isn't much time for a universe

[@justindai8401]

yea there's so much questions about it.

[@jeffjefferson2853]

The anchor being concept only works in a meta context. It was a metaphor for the death of the Fox-verse and the fact that Hugh Jackman was at the center of that 'verse's success. Marvel is going to drop the concept entirely because, as mentioned above, it really only works within the context of a meta Deadpool movie

[@cosmicgrub360]

@@jeffjefferson2853i highly doubt that, i think doom will be killing anchor beings before their time causing them to cause incursions

[@crystaluwu1012]

If the Anchor being is constantly reincarnated like the Avatar in ATLA then it would make sense, the cycle or the Anchor being, only actually dies if the Anchor is permanently erased from existance, body, mind and soul (like there soul is incapable of reincarnating again to sustain the timeline). Thats the only way to fix these plot hole.

[@kyle30710]

Kang got his ass whooped everytime he showed up. Doom is an upgrade.

[@splatinumm]

One time. This can still be fixed

[@antonymartins8310]

They really had Kang losing to Ant Man. MCU had to throw the whole script away 😂

[@sentientmustache8360]

They CANNOT fumble Doom, he needs to actually be menacing and powerful

[@opticalcanine]

Kind of the point of Kang... You always think you killed the biggest baddest Kang, then a new one shows up who says he's the real bad guy, rinse repeat...

[@unculturedswine9984]

How you bozo?? Thanks to modok self exploding and breaking KANG'S force field is why he got jumps by the super advanced ants. Casuals always have the most to say

[@O7Dayz]

Doom is most definitely an upgrade, the problem is that Kang deserves better than to be written out and forgotten like this and Doom deserves better than to be shoehorned in at the last minute.

[@RenatoEike]

It looked like a terrible Idea, now I'm sure it was.

[@hiphipjorge5755]

I think it would have been weird as hell, and just a cash grab in reality. They know that people love the Spider Man variants and Wolverine, and the nostalgia factor would drive tons of people to see the movie.

[@kparadox5734]

how do timelines exist before anchor beings are born

[@Averagebasementman]

The timelines are able to last without their anchor being for millions of years apparently. So it theres a good chance that the timelines aren’t necessarily born with their anchor beings. Kinda like how a human being isn’t born with certain parts of their body that they can’t live without later on.

[@jvy012896]

​@@Averagebasementman That don't make sense, unless they admit that the universe is actually NOT billions of years old and the MCU is a very young universe. Alas, marvel has written themselves into a hole

[@shadowsage1]

Because its a full timeline and not a snippet somewhere along it. The beginning and the end all happen simultaneously.

[@keys3353]

@@jvy012896i feel like it is universally established that with time travel and timelines there will be paradoxes... this aint nothing new the question is how does a being power time before the existence of time its just a paradox dont complicate it

[@adrianveidt8056]

Its simple, the timeline exists just to the Anchor being exists too, in another words, evey single event that happens will leads to the Anchor's birth, for example. It's similar to "if WW1 didn't happened, WW2 wouldnt too, and so my grandparents wouldnt meet each other and I would not born"

[@divyamkumar1339]

I always thought anchor being meant Hugh Jackman's Wolverine was keeping the Fox universe of movies alive lol.

[@BigFatCock0]

Yeah this doesn't make sense. Making a meta almost joke plot point in a movie where the main character talks to the camera a main plot point in an Avengers movie as well seems ridiculous.

[@Incognito-gh5qi]

Well that IS the meta narrative of the concept in D&W is that Wolverine was keeping Fox alive 😂

[@SaberEBW]

I believe Tom's Spiderman is the anchor being because of Tony. Who ONLY made the time machine to reverse the snap, AFTER he saw the picture of him and Peter. You could even say that he has been it all along as Marvel confirmed that Holland's Spiderman was the boy who stood up to Ivan's death bot in Iron Man 2.

[@sithi2356]

but when spidey got snaped it should have caused their universe to collapse so it has to be someone who has never died like Thor or the Hulk cous they have been in the MCU for a long time as well and has never died or u could even argue its captain marvel because who gave fury the idea to bring together a team. It was her

[@SaberEBW]

@@sithi2356 it can take thousands of years to happen.

[@sebastiancuadrado5312]

Bro Spider-Man isn’t the anchor being. When thanos snapped he disappeared. This kangaroo movie would have sucked and ended marvel for good. You obviously don’t know

[@Natsu12341]

Everything about the multiverse is stupid, incursion, nexus beings all so stupid, why does a universe need a nexus being to be alive wouldnt a nexus always end up past away due to age? Wouldn’t universes always die then? And why are there incursions that so why would universe/ there timeline crash how does that work anyway? The only superhero multiverse that makes sense and is good is literally the Spider-Man into the spider verse

[@SaberEBW]

@@Natsu12341 thats literally the point. Its how they keep the sacred timeline in check and stop more branching realities from living on. Its the human version that Paradox explained. The process can take up to thousands of years, and the ONLY ones who circumvent this are the ones who can travel through multiverses. Then those beings can cause incursions which are another way that the sacred timeline corrects itself. By pruning the tampered timeline and verse.

[@anthonybillings6554]

Just rewatched both seasons of f Loki and ant man 3. Kang would have been amazing and Majors was a good casting.

[@Itssheed]

It was A GREAT CASTING.

[@Dragon.um5tz]

If only he didn’t hit that woman we would still get this plot

[@Itssheed]

@@Dragon.um5tz Can you please show me where He Hit anyone??? I'll wait....

[@amari1368]

@@Dragon.um5tzhe didn’t

[@sebastianwhiteside5995]

​@@amari1368not surprised you'd white knight for a woman beater.

[@theyouth2000]

Anchor beings made no sense. It undermines the events of Loki TV series. It still feels MCU is writing themselves into a wall like Fox did with the X-men franchise.

[@dalmnationtwitch7931]

Thanos almost made the extinction of the entire universe when he snapped Spider Man away

[@ashleybanks-wm4cg]

These people don't read comics Anchor being concept is not Marvelesque it's more of DC mechanics

[@dalmnationtwitch7931]

@@ashleybanks-wm4cg wanna date me?

[@HonestJohn_01.19]

​@@ashleybanks-wm4cgMarvel wouldn't make Spider-Man the anchor being of the MCU, period. He's a Sony property. They don't have full-control over his character, they wouldn't base the existence of their entire cinematic Universe on one of the few characters left that they still dent actually own. If the MCU has an "Anchor Being" (A plot-device highly speculated to be the result of rewrites following Jonathon Majors' termination), and thus a narratve one-off exclusive to Deadpool & Wolverine ultimately inconsequential to the larger Multiversal Saga, and the various other MCU titles therein) than it's obviously Iron Man, rather than Spider-Man.

[@NotaLoca12341]

​@@ashleybanks-wm4cg you right! I'm just here for the movies! 😎

[@BasiliskX]

They said it takes a long time for a universe to die without an anchor being, so it is kind of inconsequential in the short term. Also, who's to say the anchor being has even been born yet, or on earth?

[@DrOverbuild8363]

I think the best way they could handle the change from Kang to Doctor Doom is to have Doctor Doom take over and eliminate the Kang Dynasty early on with his own variants, ending the Multiverse loop and solidifying that Doctor Doom is an even worse threat than Kang because his variants are completely unified in what they do......or perhaps he is somehow able to eliminate them all on his own without any assistance from his own variants. Perhaps because he's the rarest version of Doctor Doom and thus most of his other variants are Iron Man/Tony Stark. Either way if they play their cards right they could use Kang as a stepping stone to make Doctor Doom appear far more menacing and deadly.

[@MartinMarsano]

Yeah, an entire post credit scene just to have them killed by that latverian bastard... No thanks. Kang deserves better.

[@babymoses7623]

At this point I imagine the after credit scene of ant man 3 will be looked back on similar to the after credit scene of Incredible Hulk. They set up the Leader in 2008 and aren’t paying it off until 2025. They set up the council of kangs in 2023 and they probably won’t pay it off until 2040

[@dwightmitchell5109]

maybe they bring Majors back in 15 years and no one cares and they pay it off ...it would be an insane long play, but could possibly work.

[@MartinMarsano]

That would definitely be the best solution!

[@MartinMarsano]

@@dwightmitchell5109 Yes! I love that! I can wait, if it means that i'll eventually see Kang fight the avengers.

[@Iqbalx1]

You the best way for them to write Kang off either have Doctor Doom masacre the council of Kangs or have Deadpool be the one that kills the council preferably Deadpool

[@Kristin-s1o]

I would love to see Doomsday doing this because it could help show how powerful he is

[@johnbrylledomingo6377]

@@Kristin-s1o Just imagine Deadpool accidentally kills the Kang universe then Doom just randomly walks by then Deadpool blames him XD .

[@Kristin-s1o]

@@johnbrylledomingo6377 Lolllll

[@MartinMarsano]

Kang doesn't deserve to be wasted like this.

[@RobbinMillionz]

Thank God the Kang dynasty didn’t happy. He wasn’t a villain that was intimidating enough and he was an over actor

[@cyndawu1940]

I was so invested in Kang because of Loki and Ant Man 3, which his plotline outshined Loki and Ant man themselves in their own show/movie. Using the other two spiderman in an avengers movie is a huge power move too. Even if Kang doesn't get his own movie, I wish they would continue his plotline since it has so much potential.

[@link1565V2]

He had potential in Loki, but Ant Man 3 flushed it down the toilet. Could you imagine if they introduced Thanos in Ant Man 1 and he was beaten?

[@anolder]

It definitely has potential to be great but it just doesn’t make sense anymore

[@Spiretspvp]

No way he outshined Loki in season 2 lol Loki becomes the God of Story Telling and now has a grasp on every single parallel timeline dead and alive and resurrected the dead ones literally with his own hands, Kang couldn’t do that if he tried.

[@babygroot8023]

@@link1565V2that was simply just a variant

[@metuswrath8077]

Naw it was trash that's why barely anybody cares.. cry more 😂

[@christophercantrell2821]

I love how after Deadpool everybody is using the term “anchor being” as if it has always been a thing.

[@christovog]

Hahah right. And probably won't be spoken of again.

[@ScorchtheHawk]

I think Doom was always the right choice. It sounds to me like they were trying so hard to make Kang do what Doom did in the Secret Wars 2015 run. Now with this, they can pocket Kang for later (when they have a new actor) and bring his threat back for a future arc, maybe one that follows some of his other outings in the comics

[@curtfox91]

Man i was looking forward to seeing how powerful kang would become how deadly he would get

[@grandmyotismon]

Kang was always Doomed 😂

[@Roty24-f6s]

Lol doomed

[@mechanwhal6590]

Oh you!

[@Alpha_dogg1]

I just hope they keep the anchor being idea as stated in this video in Doomsday because the day I see Tobey Maguire as an Avenger I will die happy, i was 6 when I saw the first spider-man in theaters in 2002 which changed my life forever so this would be a full circle moment for me

[@KaiserYoshi2]

Then cry, it's not happening

[@Alpha_dogg1]

@@KaiserYoshi2 Not as much as you’ll be crying after I’m done sleeping with your precious mama boi

[@KaiserYoshi2]

@@Alpha_dogg1 Aw bohoho

[@Alpha_dogg1]

@@KaiserYoshi2 Looks like I hit a nerve 🤡 womp womp princess

[@KaiserYoshi2]

@@Alpha_dogg1 HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA It's always so funny reading baited people

[@albertomendez7063]

Doesnt the whole anchor idea leave a lot of opportunity for plot holes?

[@CollegeBallYouknow]

It became a mess the very moment they considered time travel and tried to BS their own mechanics for it. Plot holes are just par for the course.

[@yami122]

That's what I was thinking and honestly makes no sense even with magic and fantasy that an entire universe is bound together just by a single person 99% of who are going to be a superhero for Earth

[@gman3901]

​@@CollegeBallYouknowwhat are the mechanics of time travel? As far as I'm aware time travel such as this is entirely ficticious and used as a narrative device. Such narratives tend to explore the paradoxical nature of time travel that would imply it's impossibility. So for time travel to work in any form of fiction 'BS mechanics' are required.

[@jvy012896]

The whole multiverse thing had no agency and no stakes. "Who cares of Ironman dies? There's 999,999,999,999,999 more" So they had to come up with the whole anchor thing to give a reason for people to care.

[@yami122]

@@jvy012896 Which just leads to a bunch of plot holes And even then it's hard for people to care

[@blazenmessiah2211]

Im not excited for Doom. Im very upset about them not doing the Kang Dynasty

[@MartinMarsano]

Same.

[@The_Infamous_Boogyman]

Did people not hear that majors had a "no recasting " clause? Also, "fighting kangs in the past..." Sounded WAYYY dirty on low volume 😅😅😅

[@ssj2matt]

Sounds like a mess, like most of phase 4. I think it's a good idea to reel it in with Doom. Let him have his badass moment where he wipes the Council of Kangs and rules the multiverse instead, become God Emperor Doom and have Secret Wars with him as the main villain. The only concern I have with this is Doom might have a lack of screen time. He's a fairly complex character, and it sounds like he's only appearing post-credits in the F4 movie. That leaves little besides Doomsday/Secret Wars itself. I guess Thanos didn't have much either but I would have liked to see more of Doom.

[@MartinMarsano]

Having the council killed by Doom would be a shit way to end the Kang storyline and it wouldn't satisfy the audience. Kang deserves better.

[@TobyTBD]

I appreciate that you didn’t spend the majority of the video going over everything that’s happened so far then spending 5 minutes to explain the leaked plot. I was kind of hoping that the Khang Dynasty storyline would somehow introduce Apocalypse since they had that connection.

[@koammudo43]

Boy said rumored like they didnt bring him out and reveal rdj as doom 💀🤣

[@erickrafaelfloreslara8501]

He was refering to his possible appearence in Fantastic 4, not the casting of RDJ. And to be honest he kinda has to appear in F4, it's the only chance they got to introduce him early on and build him up to be a multiversal threat, even if he isnt the main villain in F4.

[@koammudo43]

@@erickrafaelfloreslara8501 there definitely should be your right ,Viktor is always with them on that mission that gives them powers so there has to be a variant Victor or rdj victor maybe they think he 💀 but he ends up in MCU because of Galactus idk 🤣

[@matthewst537]

Kang was never going work without doom

[@ashleybanks-wm4cg]

It's the opposite you'll see

[@Imwraz.]

@@ashleybanks-wm4cgexactly

[@damousx6860]

I don’t like Kang and I thought he was boring. Glad he’s getting cut

[@gordo_cabron]

Tom Holland's Spiderman an anchor being? Dude was dusted in Infinity War and no one from the TVA appeared to reverse that...

[@AstroCyGuy_edits]

It’s the reason why they didn’t come after the Avengers for time traveling in endgame

[@cyberinsecuregaming2890]

They could've also recast Kang after Johnathan Majors got convicted, but Disney these days is allergic to recasts.

[@Imwraz.]

They can’t

[@alexmartin3143]

700 variants of everyone running around but not one different Kang

[@Imwraz.]

@@alexmartin3143 nope

[@Kirasfox]

​@@alexmartin3143you did see EVERY variant was jonathan...right?

[@ronin6033]

Channing Tatum’s Gambit is his own anchor being. So awesome. Whats up doc

[@LonnieLBrown]

This is bullshit! Bring back Kang The Conquer.

[@MartinMarsano]

Exactly! He is a great villain and doesn't deserve to be wasted like this!

[@Jas-fu9kq]

I was in Liechtenstein years ago and couldn't help myself. With a wry smile on my face I politely asked one of the soldier guards in front of one of the stately mansions there... "Excuse me, can you tell me where Victor Von Doom's castle is?" I'm not sure if he knew what I was talking about, but he nonchalantly replied "I don't know. Sorry." 😉😂😂😂

[@AlejandroCamilo-k9g]

Jonathan Majors told TMZ that he is "heartbroken" by the news that Robert Downey Jr.'s Doctor Doom will be the new villain of the next two "Avengers" movies, effectively replacing Majors' Kang the Conquerer. Marvel fired Majors in December, the same day he was found guilty of two misdemeanor counts of harassment and assault. His villain, Kang, was created as the new Thanos of the Marvel Cinematic Universe and would feature prominently in "Avengers: The Kang Dynasty," which has now been scrapped and replaced by "Avengers: Doomsday," starring Downey. “Yes, heartbroken. Of course,” Majors responded when TMZ asked if he was hurt by the new direction Marvel was taking. “I love Kang. However, Doctor Doom is evil.” TMZ later noted that Downey was being given the opportunity to lead more Marvel films despite his own history of legal troubles. Downey was arrested in 1996 for possession of heroin, cocaine and an unloaded gun and received three years of probation. He faced many other legal problems in the years that followed, causing some Marvel executives to worry about casting him as Tony Stark in 2008's "Iron Man." "I think it's only fair that Mr. Downey has been met with patience, curiosity and love... and that he will be allowed to work [his] art and be creative at that level," Majors said of how Downey was given a return despite the legal problems. "I didn't really understand that." Would Majors want to return to the MCU as Kang? "Hell yes! Hell yes! I love it. I love Kang," he said. "If that's what the fans want and that's what Marvel wants, then let's move on. Hell yes."

[@igorrodrigues7382]

Is this comment about comparing a drug problem with domestic abuse? Get real.

[@zecomrade82]

​@@igorrodrigues7382 no one's comparing bozo . Both are serious crimes .majors for kicked out instantly whereas rdj was cast as iron man pretty easily.

[@atlien1988]

​@@igorrodrigues7382 that trial was a sham & his lawyer sucked. Besides, they didn't make comparisons.

[@WiSMs]

Kang the women beater

[@jonah-b7k]

Drugs and harrasment and assault are... not comparable at all.

[@chandie5298]

Doctor Doom is one of my favorite characters. I hope they don't screw this one up.

[@XYouVandal]

Im a big fan of Johnathan Majors' acting, but Kang was not that interesting

[@TheJJboy]

I can't wait for everything to be rebooted

[@anubusx]

Kang died on the way back to his home planet.

[@EasyModeKing]

Dr. Doom is so over due! He’s by far Marvel’s greatest villain, to be finally getting him after all this time has me absolutely buzzing

[@fliplife67]

IDK Kang looks weak to be a super villain.

[@ericaranda3148]

They nerfed the hell out of him. He killed many avengers, he was avenger level threat

[@splatinumm]

He isnt weak. Dude killed thousands of avengers

[@fliplife67]

@@splatinumm I get that’s in comics but in the tv show and movies that’s different.

[@splatinumm]

@@fliplife67 no. He literally tells ant man, "do you know how many rebellions ive put down? How many worlds ive conquered? How many avengers ive killed?" He also says "You're an avenger. Have i killed you before? They all blur together after awhile. You're not the one with the hammer?" Ive never read a single comic in my life

[@jayvonnoelsmith8445]

Im happy that doctor doom is going to be in the mcu but why can't kang be in the mcu he would of been been great

[@SoloLyfeTv]

Does anyone else feel like Majors will be coming back? Doom and Kang need to link up. It would be such a surprise to the audience if Majors was back.... I mean, what do A lot of marvel actors have in common (some more than others)? Drama... Controversy... We all love a redemption story which is why RDJ's portrayal of Tony Stark was so good. Majors will be back.... Also, a lot of people don't like RDJ as Doom. In light of what I've just stated, people should learn about the lonely, estranged, and calculated Dr. Doom.RDJ maybe be able to tap into something darker with Doom than what he was able to do with Tony. Just my thoughts. Would love to hear what you all think.

[@ZarathustraSpeaking]

No he won't. He is a convicted criminal

[@atlien1988]

They doomed Kang when they allowed him to lose to Ant-Man. He should have never been in that movie.

[@CollegeBallYouknow]

@@atlien1988 He could still be in the movie, just not the main bad guy to take an L against Antman. Modok should’ve taken the fall as the antagonist while Kang succeeds and escapes back to the multiverse.

[@RegularRegs]

I vote for modok

[@Idevaughan530]

They really excited me for nothing

[@RegularRegs]

RDJ is about to become the most legendary actor in history.

[@omegahtv6779]

Great video!👍🏿 thank you 🙏🏿

[@themarvelouswave1948]

Glad it was helpful!

[@spacewizards9039]

So that's where Rick and Mort got it's inspiration from for the Council Of Ricks

[@AManChoosesASlaveObeys]

Council of Reeds

[@lazyvoid7107]

No

[@GalacticGamingClips]

I’ve a only ever heard you talk about Star Wars, it’s weird hearing this voice talk about something else 😂

[@baddworld]

they coulda gave that man his job back 😂

[@kai6xx]

Exactly

[@ashleybanks-wm4cg]

No excuse for him to not reprise his role at this point The public has forgotten about it and majority of people don't think he did anything that bad tbh

[@sebastianwhiteside5995]

Why award a thug that thinks it's okay to put hands on a woman. You losers are pathetic in this thread.

[@GreenH0cker]

@@ashleybanks-wm4cg Issue is, it’s Disney. Look how they straight up abandoned Johnny Depp on a wet curb based JUST on the word of a (then unknown) bed-shitter. If someone took an action like that against me based on the bad-faith word of another person, would have zero inclination to try and work with that person or organization ever again

[@yungKaution100]

I mean, wasn't he found guilty?

[@zipmack2094]

blud said "robert downey jr was 'rumored' to be casted as dr doom" as if they didn't bring him out on a stage in front of a bunch of people and revealed he would be playing doctor doom

[@SUN-zd3xh]

Just bring back kang this is stupid writing JOHNATHAN MAJORS IS A NECESSITY

[@mvpmvp3861]

Doom isn’t a downgrade necessarily, but Kang Wars would have undoubtedly been one of the best things to come out of the MCU. The amount of story telling and ideas they had at their disposal is insane. Not sure much of Secret Wars and Battle World, but seeing all of this unfold and Doom be the true villain for the Kangs and the avengers is what I was hoping for

[@paulwatson5531]

Pisses me off kang is just gone like nothing

[@Don-Yeti]

When I see where the MCU currently is, I truly appreciate the epic retcon they did with Loki & Kang. God of Stories works almost flawlessly.

[@JunkieRemix]

They really did JM dirty and are currently doing Kang and Doom dirty too

[@ZackSNetwork]

Hilarious how RDJ is playing as Tony Starks Doom. Before we even got the original Doom in the MCU.

[@brandonc2859]

I'm glad I couldn't have handled that much kang. I was over him already

[@AbsoluteAbsurd]

you’re going to get tired of dr doom then

[@fa3bl3d]

@@AbsoluteAbsurdbro is going to lose his mind when the big bad is revealed to be a Doom Bot for the 12th time in a row 😂

[@melconhuger6776]

"I don't understand Marvel and Disney's decision-making when it comes to Doctor Doom. He's a key villain from the *Fantastic Four* comics, first appearing in issue #5 back in 1962. So why introduce him to the MCU before the *Fantastic Four* movie comes out in a few years? It doesn't make sense to feature Doom in an Avengers movie before properly establishing him with the Fantastic Four. That would be like putting Galactus in a Spider-Man movie-completely out of place. If they want to bring Doctor Doom into the MCU again, it would make more sense to do it in the new *Fantastic Four* movie or maybe in Black Panther 3. But that's Disney for you-they always think they know what the fans want, but they don't!"

[@coolbreeze756]

Why are yall all acting like the multiverse saga was good? Mostly every movie flopped, but now yall are meat-riding Kang and the saga? I hate flaky fans.

[@christovog]

Preach.

[@Totenlieder]

Oh shit, I didn’t know this guy did Marvel videos too. I know that voice anywhere, it’s dumped countless hours of Star Wars lore into my ears

[@johnnyagregaard5873]

Dr.Doom is a upgrade

[@yami122]

Possibly though the problem still remains so abandoning such a large part of the last few years of the MCU And going with a character who has absolutely zero setup rather than having the next Thanos level threat we have the next ultron level threat

[@vylon1075]

As an actor? Yes. But they made a tremendous build up with Kang in Loki only to stumble on Quantumania. Still, abandoning the Kang plotline will leave fans wanting more of him which I think what Marvel wants. I am mostly confident Kang will appear in some form .

[@Luikai]

@@yami122read the comic, secret wars doesn’t have a build up like end game. it’s a way different kind of story

[@yami122]

@@Luikai I'm aware although it did seem like the film universe was still going to have kang continue on at least a single variant off of Kang dynasty but that was just my guess

[@ramshacklerozza]

The best thing they could do (aside from just recasting Kang?) is to show Doom annihilating the council of Kangs. The opening scene of Doomsday, a portal opens to the council, and in steps Doom. We then see him just go to town, killing all of them in various means, single-handedly. This would conclude Kang’s story, albeit very abruptly and slightly underwhelming, but it could also work as a very sudden and shocking twist if done well. The council’s threat is no more, but Dr Doom’s threat is signified IMMEDIATELY

[@MartinMarsano]

No. Kang deserves better, i don't want him to be remembered as the guy humiliated and killed by Doom.

[@ashleybanks-wm4cg]

I still don't understand why we can't have Majors back considering everything has calmed down now man this would have been amazing to see

[@TheRickRoller1]

Kang would have been good as an in-between villain before starting another big story. It could have worked as a lighter tone but nobody can take it seriously when there’s nothing at stake anymore.

[@danielfwilliams8898]

They should do this as an animated movie, so they use all the characters (without worrying about cost of big name actors)

[@d_wit_tha_dot]

Omggggg I fking hate wen ppl say this it's actually so annoying we want these movies cu we wanna have them in live action DIS WOULD BE SO FKING USLESS SINCE ITS ALR IN THE COMICS

[@MartinMarsano]

@@d_wit_tha_dot Exactly!

[@KayJay940]

Jussie Smollet is the perfect recast for Kang. Everyone already hate him and he would be the perfect villian just method acting. Plus he would work for like 2 bags of popcorn and a large soda. Not like he got other work 😮

[@KasaiWolf07]

The thing with Infinity War and Endgame is that we had followed most of these heroes, Bucky and T'challa, Nat, Steve and Sam, Tony and the others on Earth, Vision and Wanda, Thor and Hulk coming back to Earth, the Guardians getting involved, Strange and Spidey also. These characters were established more or less to a degree. But with 5 and 6 if they did use DP, Wolvie the the 3 Spider-Men as well as Ghost Rider etc then it would have given them something truly amazing to go by and then left them and the 616 Avengers to be in Secret Wars. Which would have made sense.

[@024shabutie420]

Uhhhh we have too many purple enemies, uhhh.... recast someone we luckily got rid of but give him a different role. Yes... and make him GREEN AND SILVER.

[@greenlantern9577]

Who is that kang? Kang karang kang kang? Kang karang kang kang? 😅😅😅😂😂😂😅😅

[@khaleelhusairi6033]

Tf?

[@d_wit_tha_dot]

bro what💀💀💀😭

[@JarJar-kq4gn]

I understand why the marvel studio replaced Kang dynasty From what I speculate is that Kang would be indefinite because He Who Remain died I believe it would have been impossible to defeat infinite of kangs because it would be like trying to defeat An Atom

[@Pontiac127]

This is tragic. We lost a good story because the MCU was hijacked in phase 5. Johnathan Majors should have the Kang role and RDJ can play Doom. Finish the story you started. We all wanted to see it.

[@zeek3281]

Are we excited? Do we want to see yet another time when you finally get a character you’ve been asking for but instead of the one you know you get either a sawed off version of one, a variant version, or the “directors vision” of one. Cus this definitely is what I wanted.

[@Lvestfold4143]

We dodged a bullet

[@Septicshites]

lowkey

[@David.Andrew]

The bullet is coming

[@sanjaymaurya5520]

The whole idea of multiverse in dc and Marvel is bull shit

[@irving-plays-catch-up]

@@sanjaymaurya5520 I agree to some extent - DC agreed when they decided to do away with their comics multiverse in 1985. The period afterwards, before the multiverse returned was pretty awesome in my opinion. The films/TV/everything has got too obsessed with it for too long. Its like zombies 10-15ish years ago.

[@jack.h99]

The more I sit down and think about it, the more I realize how anchor beings as a concept is very half baked.

[@1491Alan]

I’m sure that Kang will be back I think it will be around 2029 so the dust will settle! Kang isn’t gone yet!

[@vincentlorusso689]

I'm sad to say, but the introduction of Kang was so anticlimactic that I don't care that he's gone now.

[@CaptainCamelToe]

Just imagine that first shot of battleword from a hero's point of view. Giving me goosebumps

[@karolclark791]

They still could've easily recast Kang, even just say some throwaway line that their multoversal travel changed his appearance

[@ronin6033]

Anchor beings, aka all the original marvel actors coming back. Lit

[@mattgamble6938]

Pal all good points but no one can play Kang in live action but majors. It's an unbreakable part of his contract. Marvel have already half committed to continuing the Kang story via some form of animation story. Could be a what if style show or an animated movie on Disney. But they will 100% sew up the Kang story, they just have to do it within the legal parameters of contracts. I hate it to honestly majors was amazing but this Doom story is just the reality and RDJ is a treat instead of some other untested punk

[@MrMine34]

I wanna see this ..bring back Johnathan

[@Imwraz.]

All they gotta do for themselves and the fan base is being back Kang (majors) and build up doom some more

[@ALITPUMPA]

“The Unfortunate rehauling of the multiverse saga” Ha ur a funny guy, good joke 🤝🏻

[@SSquirrel1976]

Being done properly, Doom should always be an upgrade. They haven't done a very good job of capturing him on film yet, but I'm hopeful for sure. Esp given we likely end up w/God Emperor Doom in Battleworld. I hope we get the famous frame of killing Thanos in it :)

[@justinnutter6008]

Doom will be an evil version of Tony. Parents die in a plane crash at a young age. He’s adopted by the Dooms. There’s already a comic that portrays this.

[@metrometheus641]

We all know for a fact that the kang dynasty would’ve been a complete disaster.

[@seanmcclure]

The best they can do is completely reboot everything.

[@bigt2079]

I really hope we don’t hear about “anchor beings” ever again.

[@AndreConnor-tq2rq]

I really wanted to see all the Kangs in the multiversal war!

[@BlackMarvel25]

Sucks that this happened to Jonathan Majors. We lose him as an actor and the character of Kang as well. So much hype and appearances just to do this.

[@dlangley49]

Makes you wonder if they'll have Doom take out the council of kangs in some way

[@xarbinchaoticneutral1785]

The Kang in Loki was such a well played villain imo. I didnt care for the antman version but the TVA version was so good.