Baccarat System Crushes It! $500 Using Safe Method!

Another demo showing the power of conservative money management!
Join us at CruiseCasinoMafia.com and turn any casino into an ATM over and over again. No need for mutual funds, options, stocks or unreliable sport gambling 'systems'!
CruiseCasinoMafia.com

[@kcandsahar]

Baccarat is a 100% game of chance. Almost 50-50. Dont waste your time on strategies. The BM part I agree on.

[@scottcronan4316]

Jack I totally agree with you on the money management .. whenever I test a new MM on the simulator I just bet player every bet cuz if your testing mm then it doesn't matter what the bet selection is.. not I do think some bet selection are better then other but none are fool proof. This seems to be a good alternative to flat betting.

[@CruiseCasinoAdvisor]

Yes! I realized years ago that a great MM is the key to long term consistency. Some bet selection systems are better than others but on even money bets they don’t make a huge impact.

[@bacc1316]

Thank you But I wish you would have spent more time on a few more examples instead of talking on and on.

[@user-se1vs2wv9u]

your conservative MM is close to where you need to be but when you when win back to back you need to be in profit after second win .

[@geekassets6479]

AGreed. However, there are some systems where the flexibility gives us the 'chance' to be safe and still return to our base bet. In a perfect world, two wins will give us the profit we need to keep moving forward. 😁

[@user-se1vs2wv9u]

ps i play everyday somtimes 2-3 times and i play bonus dragons when the odds are in my favor

[@antonysilverstone3483]

I appreciate the effort however this shoe was in no means representative of a challenging shoe, it was highly dominated by "player side" which you vey well took advantage of. I would pick a shoe which posed some challenge, if i were to prove that my MM is more important that bet selection. Moreover, how do you justify reducing bet size after a loss? if you win or lose you're still down ,

[@geekassets6479]

No one said that this shoe was ‘representative’ of anything. Doing a demo is not proof of anything. Videos are made to illustrate a concept. You can take the idea and test it in anyway that you wish. If you don’t believe that MM is more important than bet selection than you do not understand math and risk.

[@geekassets6479]

'Reducing the bet size after a loss' has NOTHING to do with being up or down immediately. This is a variation of flat betting. NO one that understands long term consistency cares about 'getting back to even' immediately. This feeds right into the lack of patience most failing gamblers continue to promote. Capturing profits and grinding out short term losses is the key to true success, not instant gratification bankroll busters such as 'double-up' or grand marty nonsense. Best of luck.

[@Skylight8889]

Thanks for sharing... Well I just saw a group that teaches their members to use the 7-step super marty with a buy in of 295 units, and if they lose they go back to using the 8-step Grand super marty with a buy in of 1576 units. According to them, they have used this method in 10,000 shoes and 99% win in the long run. So which one is more correct?

[@CruiseCasinoAdvisor]

Anyone that believes that extended marty is a solution for long term play should just burn the money. All legit pro players know standard marty is utter garbage.

[@BaccaratMan-wy9fb]

Anyone that thinks the grand Marty will earn you consistent earnings are in LaLa land.

[@BaccaratMan-wy9fb]

Yes that works but for how long,until it does not work, Long term is impossible against the variables and house edge, short term you could be lucky,I doubt 10000 shoes in real play woul render this result,over all the years all the staunch Marty's have confessed I was right eventualy.

[@CruiseCasinoAdvisor]

@@BaccaratMan-wy9fb Maybe. We have found that stats do have gravitas. Especially if you use real data from live shoes. Data doesn't lie. It is not a guarantee of short term results but they normally hold up with big sampling.

[@BaccaratMan-wy9fb]

Real data is ok to practice on,things could be very different with real money,you may do well but the only way test your system is with real money In a real situation before being comfortable with certain strategys.

[@electricshock220]

Hi. I just came across your channel. I really like your MM I just don't like always betting one side unless you have in game stop/loss if you get a long losing streak. Have you ever tried following the shoe (Betting same as last outcome) Thank you

[@jeffreykosiek4362]

Well if you started with banker like you were going to do you would of been down 450 instead of up 450. So I agree too much talking more playing

[@CruiseCasinoAdvisor]

I mispoke since I was doing the video to show the domination bet selection method.

[@electricshock220]

What stop/loss do you lose with this 10 units? Definitely need a stop/loss on bad shoes

[@CruiseCasinoAdvisor]

Absolutely, when using the conservative money management it does change the dynamic. We never really have big drawdowns so most of the time we simply look at units made by itself and 'carry over' the losses trying to grind back to breakeven during the shoe and into the next one.

[@steerpike50]

What happens if you lose the first three bets

[@geekassets6479]

The money management is a three bet system. As shown it simply repeats. The first bet triggers the next two bets win or loss. After every three bet cycle it starts over with the base bet again. It is not a martingale where bets escalate. It is a conservative grinding system that rides the small losing waves and takes advantage of the winning streaks.

[@electricshock220]

How do you like this compared to a 2-1-2... progression?

[@geekassets6479]

2-1-2 is certainly a decent option but it requires more bankroll and definitely more volatility. The MM shown here is closer to a flat bet than a 2-1-2. I have used it in the past but prefer my version or a 123.

[@electricshock220]

@geekassets6479 i agree with that. I do like your conservative mm better but if you just play One side like banker or player how many losses would you go out on if other side streaks. Im thinking going for 4 units or 4 loss in a row. Appreciate your thoughts? Also do you believe in a hand shuffled shoe can you predict the dominant side by majority of first 5 or 10 hands. Im not so sure. Maybe better to just stick with banker all the time cause of slight advantage? Appreciate your input Thanks

[@electricshock220]

Jack how does the SOS hold up with just flat betting? Thanks@@geekassets6479

[@electricshock220]

Have you ever tested this MM with follow the leader

[@geekassets6479]

Yes sir! I use it paired with lots of different bet selection concepts.

[@electricshock220]

@geekassets6479 Do you have a way of chosing a bet selection for a shoe? I like follow the winner. Only thing that beats you is the chops so need a stop/loss to get out

[@ckkoh1912]

What if you bet on banker instead? What if u were down 8 units? Please advise

[@CruiseCasinoAdvisor]

This video illustrated a simple bet selection switching from banker to player based on the results from the last three hands. Not sure what you are referring to about banker only. In regards to being down 8 units I don’t do anything differently. This money management is conservative and relies on simply grinding back to break even when you are down.

[@ckkoh1912]

@@CruiseCasinoAdvisor noted thanks

[@bigblogg4126]

Show examples using real money, these are designed for you to win 😂😂

[@geekassets6479]

Designed for me to win?? No idea why they would be 'designed for me to win'. This is a demo as stated in the description. You can test, simulate or do whatever you want with the information. Playing for 15 minutes with real money or demo does not prove anything. Testing involves big samplings of data and results. I don't do the work for others. I simply provide a small demo of a concept that you might have an interest in. If so take the time to evaluate and test it. If not than keep moving along. Best of Luck my friend!

[@electricshock220]

Is anyone using this with any success?

[@geekassets6479]

Yes! Several people have tweaked it with a few additional filters and have used it successfully in brick and mortar.