Bach: Partita No. 3, Gould (1962) バッハ パルティータ第3番 グールド

[@Stella81360]

グールドが奏でるバッハはどうしてこんなに心に響くのだろう

[@КлиоКлио-н7к]

Спасибо огромное! Гульда можно слушать бесконечно. С любовью из России!

[@calvinkgermanviet8045]

difficult for anybody to play Bach after him ... Bach enhanced by Gould. Two geniuses

[@魔女かえる]

こんなストイックなバッハは誰も弾けない！

[@shaughnfourie304]

Thank you so much BEAUTIFUL

[@happyrabbitkang]

Gorgeous!

[@tingtingwu.pianist]

So clean!!

[@thiagopomo]

This fantasia is just out of this world

[@Ian-vd4mt]

パルテイータ3番の第1曲、ファンタジア、は、傑作。グールドの演奏は、楽譜通りの端正なピアノ演奏である。

[@canman5060]

Gould's demi staccato touch is very difficult to imitate.

[@phoebelinden9602]

The touch, the phrasing, accuracy, clarity, artistry, musicality -- he is genius! Difficult to imitate? Yep.

[@jeannotdenimes158]

Very nice definition

[@pianosbloxworld4460]

@@phoebelinden9602 I tried to imitate it, with success. However, I find the hardest aspect to replicate is the absolute clarity of the polyphonic features of Bach. Granted, Glenn's approach to Bach was by all means not emotional, just intellect and spirit. It is good to have intellect in playing-that way, you know what you are doing. However, I find too much intellect in an approach too cold in approach anyway, and sometimes I need to take a break from Gould's sound. In some composers, having a balance of emotional intelligence and structural intelligence is key-I'm talking about composers from the 19th century such as Mendelssohn and Chopin. Glenn's approach to those too is much too cold and structured in my taste. Anyway, that's my opinion which no one ever took seriously anyway.

[@yoelrappaport5991]

You mean impossible

[@madaboutvoice]

@@pianosbloxworld4460 I am intrigued: you heard GG play Chopin and Mendelssohn?

[@laotian78]

The 6 thumbs down really got problem

[@陽天-g8g]

この曲はパルティータの中では地味な曲だが、その地味さの中に良さが隠されとる。これを見抜かなあかん。わしも弾いた。弾いたらわかるええ曲や。

[@JackOstinato]

Der größte Bach-Pianist aller Zeiten. Stimmst du nicht zu?

[@niqnact1121]

Ja, das tue ich.

[@douglasdickerson5184]

👍

[@thiagopomo]

1:02-1:08 looping

[@liberjimenez3748]

00:05

[@liberjimenez3748]

9:53

[@chrrev1]

Several score inaccuracies

[@matheom.5400]

You are frustrated, I suppose. Enjoy the music!

[@niqnact1121]

He does stuff his own way, I’ve noticed that

[@larsthorsmith8369]

much too high tempo in my opinion.