Barristers' Deep Dive: Does Amber's Appeal Have ANY Merit?

More videos:
Why I am talking about this:
• Video
Interview Part 1 Reaction: • UK Barrister REACTION ...
Interview Part 2 Reaction: • UK Barrister REACTION ...
Interview Part 3 • UK Barrister REACTION ...
Watch my UK #johnnydepp trial analysis
Amber Heard INTERVIEW REACTION PART 1:
• UK Barrister REACTION ...
JUROR SPEAKS OUT: REACTION:
• JUROR TELLS ALL! Amber...
UK Trial Analysis:
PART 1:
• Video
Part 2:
• Depp v Heard UK Judgme...
PART 3
• INCIDENT 9 - "THE STAI...
Petition:
www.change.org/JusticeForJohn...
#JohnnyDepp Playlist:
/ playlist
list=PLOu1C4wHKjG56JEzgHzNjfbgyJfPzHa9Z
Check out my exclusive content at www.blackbeltbarrister.com
Also me: kzbin.info?...
My wife's cooking: kzbin.info...
BlackBeltFLOOF: kzbin.info?su...
Address for PAID Formal Advice ONLY: [e-mail]
Disclaimer: Neither this nor any other video, may be taken as legal advice. I accept no liability whatever for any reliance placed upon it, as there is no contract between us and I am not instructed by you.
For formal advice, please contact [e-mail].
💌 Become a channel member to access stripes and perks!
/ @blackbeltbarrister
MY CAMERA GEAR
🎥 Big Camera amzn.to/3yFFcFf
🎥 Small Camera amzn.to/2RB7ez9
🎙 RODE VIDEOMic Pro+ amzn.to/2QCJURi
Gobe ND Filter amzn.to/2R3eEuA
Neewer Ring Light amzn.to/3aOkLtT
Switch Pod amzn.to/3sZb8yA
JOBY Tripod amzn.to/3dXJYDT
External Media Drive amzn.to/3uxNDOQ 🎓 Brilliant contract law book:
amzn.to/2PHC2O1 🎓 Excellent book with an overview of criminal law:
amzn.to/3gTPEAV 🎓 Learn more about trespass and tort law:
amzn.to/32N6TLS
(Affiliate link)
LAW FAQS
• Common Law
CONSUMER LAW PLAYLIST:
• Consumer Law
TREE LAW PLAYLIST:
• Tree Law Miniseries
ROAD TRAFFIC LAW PLAYLIST:
• Road Traffic Law
FAMILY LAW PLAYLIST:
• Family Law
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER:
I'm a Barrister of England and Wales.
Videos for educational guidance only, Always seek advice before taking action. Videos on my channel are not legal advice and should not be taken as such. I accept no liability for any reliance placed upon the content of these videos or references, therein.
#blackbeltbarrister #lawyer #barrister
Description contains affiliate links; I will occasionally earn commissions from qualifying purchases or leads generated.

[@gerristaples3595]

Johnny had his day in court and said what he needed to say. I saw an interview with Camille, where she said if Johnny had lost the case, that would have been the end of it, but he needed to explain to his kids and people who supported him, what had happened. He’s now moved on. The on going fracas is engineered by his abuser. She has lost in the court of public opinion, and has found to be a liar and an abuser.

[@Teresa-ih4sn]

You summed this up perfectly!

[@anjou6497]

He is in fact, the liar and abuser.

[@leejames3787]

@@anjou6497 😂 one sandwich short of a picnic son.

[@janetfaber5414]

@@anjou6497 stop projecting

[@Pamlandy2]

You don't even need Camille to say that. Johnny himself literally said he wanted to state his case. He would never believe he did what she says he did......and doesn't remember. But, if the jury had found him liable, then so be it. He would have moved on. ❤️❤️

[@andrewjones9991]

I don't consider stating the time period you allege to have been abused and saying it was by your husband an "implication". She only had one husband. It's not implying it's Johnny, it's flat out stating it, IMO. Like if someone lied out their only brother and said their brother did x,y, and z, why would they literally have to say the name? We all can figure out who it is.

[@falecialogan1717]

Exactly

[@stephaniegentryart]

It’s also very confusing. Did he abuse her or didn’t he? She’s saying he did. Therefore isn’t the article she wrote about him? I don’t see how isnt about it?

[@falecialogan1717]

@@stephaniegentryart it’s really not confusing. The recordings played during trial ( which are also on YT) and now the released documents prove that her azz wasn’t abused by JD. If you haven’t watched the trial, please do so. Even watch her 2016 deposition. You’ll have the opportunity to see how she sunk her own ship of lies. There’s an old saying “ the hole that you dig for someone else is the very hole that you will fall in”……..that opted was the hole..

[@stephaniegentryart]

@@falecialogan1717 oh I’m aware it’s clear. I’m saying her statements are confusing. I’ve seen the trial and understand fully what happened. Her statements are not clear. My point is. She is contradicting herself with the statement that the article was not about him. And then admitted and accused him of domestic violence in court. Like it doesn’t add up. If the article indeed wasn’t about him. Then why did he need to prove innocence (glad he did) but why? Why did they argue that rout while also saying “it’s not about him” but then in court she admitted it was while saying it’s not basically. That’s what I was saying is confusing her perspective. My perspective is not that JD clearly proves himself innocent and I’m glad. I just don’t see how that article is not about JD. And was saying AH was lying when she said it was not about JD sorry if I wasn’t clear! Also for the record I followed the trial and watched most of it ;) it was quite satisfying watching a chronic liar get caught in the lies.

[@GenuineUntelligence]

@@stephaniegentryart I think AHs defense argument was to claim that JD did abuse her but that the article was about her experience as opposed to what she claims he did and that because she was talking about herself rather than him that meant it wasn't about him. Does that make sense? Like her defense was literally "yes, he did all this horrible stuff to me but I'm self obsessed and only talked about myself so it can't have been about him even though he did it and I told everyone he did it but I only talked about ME!!!"

[@abumohandes4487]

Defamation by implication..... But on the stand AH explicitly said she wrote it because of JD. And she kept accusing him under oath with no evidence at all.

[@jakebullet1731]

“The article didn’t name JD” also “The article was about JD”

[@RagingNana-KindredSpirit50]

@@jakebullet1731 AH testified under oath that the Article was about JD and she did write it. Freedom of speech flies out the window with that.

[@BehindtheseEyes]

Defamation Statements/ Charge Must Occur PRIOR to Trial/testimony. AH testimony just confirmed her original intention of naming/defaming Depp.

[@bojohanconstantlyconfused1386]

Here’s the way appeal courts work…they start at the very beginning, when the case was filed. Only information available at that time can be considered. They are ruling whether any judge’s decision was wrong. No new evidence, except for extreme circumstances, is allowed. No testimony on the stand is considered. Only the original evidence proffered is reviewed regarding the courts decisions. Was evidence suppressed or irrelevant evidence allowed, those types of decisions.

[@abumohandes4487]

@@bojohanconstantlyconfused1386 And if the appeals court decides that mistakes were made, is it sent back to the lower courts for retrial or does the appeal court do a retrial? Do all witnesses have to say the same thing all over again? That sounds very odd to me. Disclaimer: I'm an engineer, I like things to be efficient and effective.

[@lechenaultia5863]

Whatever Heard did or didn't say in her op-ed, she stated clearly in trial that the op--ed was about Depp....and the AÇLU lawyer indicated Heard had wanted it to refer more directly to Depp. This was an extremely interesting discussion, thank you!

[@Ready2_Go]

Yeah. That's why they're going for freedom of speech. It won't work tho.

[@pinia69]

true - its kind of funny how easily you forget the reason what this trial actually was about. 👌

[@andreacarter8202]

Even if Heard wins this appeal she won’t be vindicated. No one’s gonna forget her ugly behavior as brought out in the trial. She sunk herself with her own words. She needs to move on already.

[@MissaPality]

Ms. Vasquez and Mr. Chew even said that Ms. Vasquez used Ms. Heard's own words against her. Camille was right when she said "words matter"

[@oneway1119]

Exactly!!! She has lost her fight on facts and evidence and latching on legal loopholes.

[@ifynwamma]

Yes....we all heard the audio tapes

[@mystifeyed]

She has free speech she just can’t LIE! Lies have consequences! And seven jurors believe she lied. That’s the point of the trial. I seriously doubt there’s anything to overturn that verdict! I watched the entire trial and Judge Azcarate was exceedingly fair. IMO.

[@nellsun2521]

Even lying is still allowed - as long as you're not impacting someone else's life with ur lies

[@missJolie85]

@@nellsun2521 Not necessarily, but the mere fact that one person would use time and energi, and not to mention money, to take this to trial indicates that one is at the very least impacted emotionally. What you need is to show that the statement was false, or showed "reckless disregard" for whether it was true or false, and the statement also must be published.

[@ritacampbell3833]

Agreed. Amber just has to stay in the news and waste peoples time.

[@charlotteetienne1371]

👍she’s been listened to and believed for more than 5 years! Unfortunately

[@Freezient]

Its not fair cause Amber didn’t win lol

[@cproteus]

The statement of ‘apply the law properly’ is quite the swipe at Judge Ascarote - who allowed a great deal of BS in the name of a ‘fair trial’ for Amber.

[@christinel5347]

She will never stop fighting with JD. He was right about her, she has the need to fight constantly

[@thestraightroad305]

I have come to really enjoy Mr. Robertshaw; his insights and voice are so enjoyable. And your back and forth with humor and experience -just a great combination. I “Pledge” my listener loyalty!

[@AnnaBellaBeth93]

I would think that Johnny would have a better chance at winning an appeal in the UK than Amber has winning this appeal in Virginia. However, Amber seems to have friends in high places.

[@lapnguyen7804]

i understand what you are saying but there is always a slight chance in a just court than a corrupted one. jd have less chance than amber because uk wouldnt want to expose their corrupt judge action.

[@Jannbright24]

Amber is getting $$$ from someone

[@LindaDB]

Love and fear are opposites. I wonder what the actual motivations are for those people in high places.

[@TheRealCrayono1]

...or did she record someone in low places...?

[@tiamieaton1952]

They aren’t friends. Probably just more rats sharing the sewer with her.

[@sienavanschoor339]

You both give me hope that there is good probability that AH’s appeal could be denied.

[@shelleylindquist9452]

Yeah I was worried too

[@mrs.donohue9569]

This is the first time I've appreciated any form of wit and intelligence coming out of Elaine. Good for her.

[@mrgregc14]

I think she's upset because she didn't win. She wanted so badly to bring down JD!

[@aromaladyellie]

I think it's less she wanted to bring him down at this point and more this trial was a complete disaster for her. I daresay this may never have been about taking him down and was always about getting attention. If it was to take him down for daring to want to leave her, I think she would have faired a lot better if she hadn't written the op-ed and instead focused more on painting her story to her friends. Then manipulate her friends until one of them came out and said "AH said JD abused her, here is what I saw". Once one broke the silence the others would follow. That might have made a lot of JD's evidence against her irrelevant and made it more believable that she just "wanted this to be done" and "never wanted this public" and everything else she's been saying. She also could have done better with the makeup I think if this truly was about bringing him down. She didn't need the pictures of her injuries for attention, and I still believe the pictures of "his" drug abuse were of her own. I truly don't think this was about destroying him until recently. The whole time it was about attention and sympathy.

[@derek.....]

Elaine pledges her support,yeah right like Amber pledged donations she never fulfilled.

[@izzyakin9759]

That's why she is pledging her support and not donating it 🤣🤣

[@rickt1951]

lol lol lol lol

[@100Mickl]

So if Elaine knows difference between pledge and donate the she was lying

[@rachelmcqueen2107]

i saw clips of the turd interview going by what she said she had no intentions to give to charity

[@margaretnicol3423]

More important - is there any movement on JD's appeal in the UK?

[@gleefulme9617]

Why should JD waste more money on the UK judgement? He won in the USA against the Turd. That's far more important than the UK silly business. Turd lied to a goofy judge bent on "believing" her tripe. Dan Wooton should be apologizing to JD now that both sides of the matter are known. It shows Wooton is a poor journalist who doesn't properly verify his stories before he rushes to print.

[@taylorbug9]

@@gleefulme9617 the judge from the UK case should be brought up on criminal charges. It's been found out that not only is the judge friends with Amber Heard and her legal team but he's also the father of an important person at the publication that put out the defamatory article in the first place. I don't know how it was even legal for that judge to sit on that trial. The conflict of interest was off the charts in this case. And yet the UK still somehow let him sit there, judge the case, and then let him retire with no consequences. I'm sorry but that's a huge miscarriage of justice. And the UK government should be held accountable and so should that judge.

[@louellamoyer5578]

@@taylorbug9 Kudos to you for pointing that out! They should give JD the appeal on the grounds that the UK judge was biased.

[@LadyWindsor]

@@taylorbug9 and don't forget the owner of the sun rag newspapers, son, was and is, on the board of one of Elon Musks companies. Who was amber dating at the time ? The entire court case was disgusting!

[@jw-hy5nq]

@@taylorbug9 The owner of the sun Rupert Murdoch has bought half the judges in the UK and Canada.

[@isabellflorence4956]

Amber H confessed on the stand under oath that she submitted that “op-ed” so that removed all doubt about who the article was about and who authorized it. She blurted it out on the stand. So now what’s her defense?

[@ianmckinney3446]

Yes but in my view because Depp lost the UK trial and the judge found 12 occasions that he abused amber, it gave amber every right to write the op-ed.

[@Draggobuttboi]

A questionable judgement from a different country with different standards for abuse, the UK judgement doesn't and shouldn't effect anything in the USA.

[@ianmckinney3446]

@@Draggobuttboi but wouldn't that not set a dangerous president, that if you don't like a result go to a different country?

[@thefairhairedboywiththered2951]

@@ianmckinney3446 - Was the op ed not written before the UK case?

[@thefairhairedboywiththered2951]

@@ianmckinney3446 - The UK judgement is odd. Amber was not the defendant and so not subject to the same disclosure obligations, so there was evidence that Jonny's side had not been able adduce. However, the judgment laid heavily on her accusations rather than whether the Sun knowingly defamed Johnny. The UK Judge also clearly believed Amber lied in one instance but did not consider that this would carry weight in his assessment on her reliability with the other allegations!

[@ratusbagus]

Here in the UK, Pledge was a product that put a surface veneer of gloss on your old wooden furniture. Similar to Elaine's only possible strategy to mitigate AH's behaviour and lies.

[@SouthernLaw]

I agree previous caselaw suggests Amber’s likely line of argument will fail. Great discussion!

[@thekitowl]

Strange how neither of them mentioned the first amendment as that is what MSM is saying these new lawyers are specialist in.

[@barbieworld8491]

Southern Law I love your show!!

[@taylorbug9]

No, it literally doesn't. And I'm getting super tired of seeing articles from every major media source saying that she could possibly win. She's not going to win she doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell.

[@harpy2602]

The ideas that "new evidence" will help her appeal are really pissing me off. It's not new just because it's publically available now. The vast vast majority of the withheld "evidence" was properly kept out and thus has no bearing on the verdict. There was no legal mistake made that warrants granting an appeal. No matter how hard Elaine and Heard tried to make issue out of things that weren't problematic, things were done properly. The MSM spouting on about things they're ill-informed on is old and tired. If you can't properly parse legal documents and don't understand what things mean, you shouldn't be writing clickbait articles about it. Legally AH has no realistic chance of ver winning appeal, and the MSM's soapbox agenda is long past the point of credibility.

[@mandycmorris]

@Harpy it does seem in the the last day the MSM are starting to turn a little toward JD in a more positive manner. Let’s hope it continues and AH finally fades into obscurity where she deserves to be !

[@im2yys4u81]

The MSM continues to go on about "new evidence." That dog won't hunt. Appeals are decided "on the record." "New evidence" is not considered.

[@im2yys4u81]

@@harpy2602 The MSM argument about "new evidence" only goes to illustrate their ignorance. Appeals are decided "on the record." After thoughts and "evidence" that was not introduced onto the trial record are inadmissible. Their agenda is to sell their ragsheets, and AH's agenda is to stay significant.

[@jw-hy5nq]

She can't win, so she is going to run off to Israel to hide. Rumour is she married Eve Barlow (jewish) and is trying to get Israeli citizenship to protect herself from the judgement.

[@annakarenina3188]

I loved the line that Elaine wrote about "pledged". (Only eclipsed by Tyler Perry saying "happy birthday Princess Meghan" -- that tweet was quite honestly the best and most polite snark said in plain sight) Am actually worried for Elaine, the law-tube people in VA stated she was in tears several times, and there was a raging argument with AH screetching at Elaine.... If it's accurate that AH is abusive, then I think Elaine was her latest target. So I hope she was given enough pay to retire, and get a lot of therapy.

[@roseharvey2664]

I think Elaine was paid very well.

[@AL-fl4jk]

@@roseharvey2664 yeah Elaine doesn’t care this is a level of press and notoriety she wouldn’t have dreamed of before, she’s riding this to the bank

[@brianabc83]

@@AL-fl4jk but she didn't get favorable press, in fact she was portrayed as somewhat incompetent, therefore that kind of press can't be good for business.

[@Solitude11-11]

But why on earth did she do those awful post trial interviews? That was really the final nail in the coffin.

[@yardengali]

@@brianabc83 As a famous person once said.."I don't care what they say about me as long as they spell my name right"

[@juliahartley-barnes975]

At the end of AH’s testimony she admitted that the op-Ed indeed was about JD. Does that not negate this “defamation by implication” anyway?

[@paulaseabee8442]

So AH has decided to employ another expensive law firm. I wonder how she expects to pay them, as I can't imagine whoever is bankrolling her will keep throwing money to her.

[@Lifewithpersians]

AH Hired some really good attorneys but I really pray that her appeal is denied and that she just goes away

[@mandycmorris]

@R K that’s what I keep saying- fades away into obscurity where she belongs- she’s damaged so many people through her adult life.

[@aleccampbell7707]

She loses her retainer if appeal is just thrown out?

[@catherinerummel6510]

I think it's all about lowering the judgement . Wondering if Amber will go to jail for anything she did. Plain evil. Just want her to move on. This is a big lesson for Johnny, not everyone is beautiful on the inside.

[@ginnycee13]

She is not even beautiful on the outside. She used to look ok - about 12 years ago. Now she's that flappy overused fishmarket. What is the point of her appeal anyway? She still only got her ridiculous lies? She is just an embarrassing scrounger, spouse abuser, golddigger & liar. I'm extensively sick & tired of her. Johnny Depp & his family need to recover from her "love & care". I'm so very glad, that they all survived the living nightmare called AH. I really hope, this will be the last words, we hear of her. Anymore appeals will get even me exhausted. Poor Johnny Depp, putting up with this torture for almost a decade now.

[@anjou6497]

You've got to stop using the word 'evil.' Makes you come across as rather stupid . And a big lesson to Johnny would be,: stop ripping off song lyrics, and original photography for artwork. Creep.

[@herewegoagain632]

Yes it was the right result but I hope that ALLmiddle aged gents learn, not just JD. Learn NOT to be big stupid cliches. jeez. JD was such a muppet here. Im still shaking my head. I mean he has a daughter!!!! WOW. Cant stand either of them but justice was served and hopefully the appeal bombs, as it should.

[@anjou6497]

@@herewegoagain632 yes i agree, can't stand either of them but JD is beginnng to truly show himself. Oh dear. 👍🧡🌱💜😖

[@andreacarss4718]

Why has no one brought in injectable cosmetic procedures as she has clearly had cheek fillers and likely botox too which would explain any “real” bruises. Not seen any reference in the unsealed docs?

[@Hidakaku56]

More than likely depps team couldn’t find any justification for compelling the records pointing towards when she had the procedures let alone get the actual records of the procedures without it very easily being irrelevant. They probably thought it’d be a better allotment of time and resources to deal with getting evidence of bigger lies and hope the jury could see the pictures as not showing the extent of the injuries she was alleging

[@etsuplayground9242]

Whatever you may think about Elaine, she fought for Amber tooth and nail, and now she is dropped by her. This kind of shows what kind of person her client was.

[@karinadams3303]

Amber is a foul villain

[@magnus33john]

Basically in plain english she has a snowballs chance in hell of actually winning the appeal

[@mandycmorris]

@Eric M I sure as heck hope so !

[@im2yys4u81]

That's accurate.

[@j9andphoenix]

If the appeal revolves around the issue of First Amendment Rights, which boiled down is the right to free speech - it is only free if without malicious intent. During the trial I recall emails regarding the OP ED from someone within the Washington Post and possibly their legal team with highlighted sections suggesting they may wish to alter or remove as they clearly referenced JD. That thing called Amber also pretty much admitted writing it because Johnny was a man with power. All that said there is a clear nexus between JD having been proved innocent of all her ugly allegations and the OP ED she either wrote or put her name to.

[@pattyforrest933]

Different all of your analytical skills are helping a lot of people not deal only with Amber and Johnny but our whole world has been Delta terrible bunch of malice and slander in our news media and it's alerting everyone to how that has been a world scheme against our ignorance so on a wider scale I think you're doing a big thing hugs

[@1957marjorie]

Thank you guys for breaking these issues down for us. It's always lovely being over here 🙋‍♀💖

[@susanann843]

I hope your not going to give up on JD in the appeal for him in this country.

[@NanaonHazel]

according to Law and Lumber who practices in Virginia, several of the judges/lawyers on the appellate court are the same ones that decided the case of the little girl with the peanut allergy. They are not likely to overrule themselves.

[@KravKernow]

No. The only possible way of distinguishing the case is to argue it should be different for public figures; but can't see anything in Pendleton that leaves that open or suggests they would have come to a different conclusion for public figures.

[@hajime6908]

@@KravKernow so what does that mean ?

[@KravKernow]

@@hajime6908 We're doing a follow up tomorrow on public figures generally and how sometimes they get treated differently in law. So we'll dive into this issue then!

[@hajime6908]

@@KravKernow thanks for the answer

[@stirlingmoss4621]

Does Amber have 'appeal?' Not at all.

[@elainejohnson6955]

I wonder if Amber is "pledging" to pay her lawyers since the insurance companies are sewing her.

[@Agucci_1]

It’s been said that I think it’s travelers insurance is paying. Now before she turned down the insurance lawyers so maybe they said use our lawyers or we can’t/won’t pay?

[@yardengali]

She should sue them for sewing her😜

[@booksy4514]

@@yardengali 😄😂😄😄😄😄😄😄she’s not going to sew or sewing them as the case may be.

[@Theresa-Lottodo]

The implication for JD is the time that Ms Heard said she came out about DV and stated, ''2 years ago''. That was just after she filed for divorce. That truth implies defamation for JD, in my humble opinion.

[@davecooke7868]

How can there be an appeal when she hasn’t put up the 10.35 million + interest .

[@SouthernLaw]

It was just a misreading of a comment from the judge that caused that incorrect belief to come about. The suspension bond is at the choice of the appellant; it’s not mandatory.

[@jochenrudiger]

And this is where I am not happy about JD's kindness. If I was in his position, after all she did, I would squeeze every penny out of her, so that she cannot afford any shenanigans. He is the far better person and just is satisfied to have shown the truth. But she does not afford any mercy. Still doing shady things with all her stans.

[@SouthernLaw]

@@jochenrudiger well without the suspension bond he could move forward with collection but that is a difficult and complicated process even without an appeal pending.

[@jochenrudiger]

@@SouthernLaw I would not bother wasting my time. I would sell it to the worst company specialized in getting money from people.

[@taylorbug9]

@@jochenrudiger but at what point does it stop being the bigger person and start being the enabler? This is what we have to ask ourselves as a society. Because we can't just keep being nice to people that aren't nice back. They're never going to learn. Just like Amber Heard is still pulling her s*** so is every other narcissist who was never taught a lesson. I'm dealing with a woman in her 50s who's trying to illegally evict me even though she's the one that's broken every law on the books. Why is she like that? Because no one ever taught her a lesson. But I am, I'm going to sue the sh_t out of her and I'm going to take her for everything she has. And she's going to think twice before she ever f_cks with somebody again. It is time to stop being the bigger person in a world where that will not stop anyone from walking all over you.

[@SaltyMsMorton]

Your opening music is so sweet and soothing. I couldn’t wait for the pair of you to deep dive this!!!!!!! Thank you for everything!

[@tiamieaton1952]

As always you two are wonderful!! Thank you again for your knowledge, insight, and truth!!!😊

[@aprilfox1057]

Elaine pledges support - she is not going to give any 🤣🤣🤣🤣💩

[@kelartemi]

It’s interesting to me that the fourth statement that was dismissed but was similarly claimed by AH team. We kept hearing that AH was the victim of a smear campaign with threats and harassment etc caused by JD

[@Ready2_Go]

Not true, tho. He was laying low. This was all on individual streamers and channels. We all decided she was a liar and started proving it.

[@shirleymarlin1593]

Yes that's not true and if you look it up now you will see that it's her and her people that are threatening and harassing Johnny's followers the things they say to us it's on real and they are still making bad comments about Johnny I have gotten to wear every time I see something I report it but it doesn't do any good I have gotten a couple of tweets taking down from Eve Barlow I just wish we could get it all stopped Johnny could care less about the money he just wanted to get his truth out he did that she made the comment she just wants Johnny to leave her alone so she can live her life and be a mother why is it she's not doing that why is she still keeps going after Johnny

[@juliegibson-2020]

Really enjoy listening to you both!! Thank you for the information!!

[@elizabethgregory7998]

Another great episode! Thank you so much for your patient & interesting explanations on point of law. There are many law lecturers that could do with your enlightenment 😄😄😄

[@michaelccopelandsr7120]

Anyone supporting Amber has outed themselves as, "Those who worship evils might." Where the hell's Green Lantern when you need him?

[@donnachampion3169]

Thanks great discussion and insight you guys are great .

[@misshgold]

Fantastic video, extremely informative. Love listening to you both ❤

[@77MeOnlyMe77]

Thanks very much Daniel and Alan. Very helpful, as usual. There's so many things to understand in the law, and the courts. And I hope you're prediction is right.

[@LightsandVessels]

There's such a fantastic chemistry between the two of you, and no ego battles, which really allows to focus on the issue at hand and the interesting developments. I'm learning a lot from you. thanks

[@rebeccaregan23]

We need more Dan and Al’s in the world! Thank you for keeping me sane amongst all this madness 😆

[@shweefranglais7900]

Really enjoyed and appreciated this. Thanks guys. Excellent.

[@roses9339]

Spot on everything, both have explained in laymans terms. Keep doing these please, I'm not an academic but love to understand the ins and out of law. Cheers Rosemary Perth Western Australia (71 yrs)

[@kateeast7352]

Can they overturn the verdict even though she said herself on the stand in the court of law That she wrote the op ed was written about US AND RICH POWERFUL MEN LIKE HIM.

[@im2yys4u81]

Highly unlikely that the jury verdict will be overturned. JD stands a much better chance of reducing the judgment against him than AH does on her wild claims.

[@thekitowl]

Would have thought AH would have made that argument if it was relevant. It’s was clear from the evidence it was about JD, even the super lawyer tasked with going through the op ed confirmed it.

[@booradley8895]

Does not matter if the verdict is overturned Depp had his moment in court, told the truth and now is getting on with his life. Depp will still be in work whilst Turd will be still be in her namesake up to her eyeballs.

[@lesiaoneill8569]

I feel Elaine might not be aware enough to use the word pledge sarcastically, though, I wish she was using this word as snark.

[@alabamatrixie7379]

I'm with you! I think her choice of the word "pledge" went right over her head but it sure is funny for the rest of us lol

[@abumohandes4487]

She's not dumb. She got the client from hell with the case from hell. I doubt anybody else would have done better.

[@kevinblythe2192]

@@abumohandes4487 No, she's pretty dumb in my opinion, having wasted a lot of time in court with repetitive questions that went nowhere. At the very least, WELL past her prime.

[@eachandeverything1836]

I hope she’s using “pledge” & “FY” synonymously 😂😂. That’s what I’d damn sure tell Amber lol.

[@lesiaoneill8569]

@Abu Mohandes I guess we'll see. I think Elaine was overwhelmed for sure.

[@steved9869]

Bare in mind, this could be a way to show that "pledged" is equal to "as good as paid"... if Elaine "pledged" and then goes on to actually demonstrate her support, they could argue it by saying "see??? its the same thing!!!" .... It's a total smoke and mirror attempt to change the narrative

[@mandycmorris]

I’m sure so many people like myself pray that your predictions are right that Amber doesn’t get lucky. Thank you for a very enjoyable video .

[@thestraightroad305]

I follow with attention and interest to each of the legal issues of this case as you explore them. It’s astonishing how many tendrils and branches there are as the case moves along. Alan’s comparison of the peanut allergy case was very instructive. I sure you are adding to your knowledge banks in the matter of US law as well. I’d like to say that I appreciate your more local videos-I hope many people avail themselves of this education.

[@dollpartz4u]

Oh yeah, if this one won’t work she’ll nik pick and pick something else just to try to win. She needs to let it go and disappear!

[@KK-ji1rk]

Thanks, guys!! This was very interesting and informative.

[@bostonterry7460]

Thank you for the education and the laughs 🤩

[@dianeblackwell9461]

Loved this content, explained simply, thank you

[@sparkey6746]

Interesting analysis, thank you.

[@wendyredd9890]

Love watching you guys.

[@janedickson6167]

Another great video, fascinating & thank you

[@barbarafletcher121]

Extremely informative!

[@deborahkizer4664]

Good afternoon sirs and family. Stay blessed . . 🙏👍❤🐕✌🌼🌻🌞💛.

[@carlacastillo3110]

Great vídeo blackbelt, you are doing a great job.

[@michelleanderson8370]

Thank you very much for this conversation. I always learn something new from these. I couldn't understand what grounds they would have to win an appeal on any issue but you gave me new things to ponder. Thanks

[@sjreviews3675]

Your information helps me in so many ways. Even when supporting my adult kids in their daily living. It grounds me into a way of thinking that is sound and rational. Thank you so much!

[@tonyallen1112]

A parthian shot from Elaine! Nice one, well done and will it be lost on AH? Thank you for explaining your views, much appreciated.

[@slister45]

You love talking, I love listening. Please keep going! 🙏

[@camillemayers103]

Black Belt and Alan, thank you for the analysis and explanation of case law upon which your rationale is based. I really enjoyed it and am very grateful.🤗

[@coffeebixuk]

Thank you for the clear analysis.

[@belegur8108]

Some wise guy once said, personal freedom ends when it touches another person. sounds rather common sense to me.

[@poco9964]

Keep up the great work.

[@brynstocker2647]

As always gentlemen, a concise and insightful discussion. I could listen to you for hours. Thank you ! My question is….even if the verdict were reversed, what would AH actually achieve? Would she not potentially be even more disliked and even less employable ? I appreciate the money aspect, and perhaps that would be enough for her. She seems to have the skin of a rhinoceros as far as taking criticism is concerned, perhaps another trait of an “alleged” narcissist. After all that has transpired, if AH’s appeal were to be upheld, would JD then once again be vilified by the media and public?

[@gracej4306]

Love that Al talked about the Pendleton case!

[@bucketree]

Listening and watching in nz currently studying law really interesting comments and strategy

[@mercedezlucke-benedict1122]

I really enjoyed both of you

[@maxinemax6593]

Ah lied under oath why does she get away with this seems very unfair she admitted writing ✍ the op Ed so why is she even be allowed to appeal 🤔 ?

[@quiltinmom8410]

Well done gentlemen!

[@jenniferchaney3019]

Thank You ❤️🙏😊 Gentlemen GREAT 👍💯 WORK!!!!!!!

[@t.m.i.1245]

Thank you! I agree with your take on this. 💕🏴‍☠️

[@cassies5501]

100% guaranteed they will throw Elaine under the bus as grounds for their appeal; ineffective counsel

[@kathrynimhoff344]

Question- Does the UK public have a strong opinion about the way the UK trial was conducted after the US trial and after seeing the UK depositions all over youtube?

[@Solitude11-11]

Yes! Most of us were astounded and horrified at the way it went. Long before this latest trial. The information about these two has been around a long time, and people can listen, read, and decide for themselves. The Sun is a vile rag and always has been.

[@CaSh-H]

Love you two; pure fact banter 🥰

[@Nonyabusiness1206]

I wish some other KZbinrs would watch your programs more then with their daily shows their content would be better… love learning more about the process. Ty for all you do !! ❤

[@glenyshanlon5112]

Very interesting both thanks gents 👍

[@utube999ify]

I don't remember the Depp v Heard case talk about the media discussing Heard's article and directly referencing Depp. Surely, that would kill this argument of implication.

[@RivkaZohar]

Thank you! For making a better world:)

[@amchristie8894]

The reason the first amendment doesn't cover defamation is because it is a call to action. If you defame someone in public you are calling for them to be arrested, lose their reputation/ job/ family/ friends or even have violence committed upon them. It's the same as incitement. I don't understand why AH doesn't get this.

[@irenehumphries1910]

Didn’t she admit during testimony that the article was about him. “That’s why I wrote it,” in reference to a question Camille asked about Depp.

[@Mewvision]

Maybe Elaine has found it to be “the perfect time” subsequent to advice from her therapist?

[@willdeit6057]

Great comments and interesting fact.

[@krakerkrunch]

Señores abogados, siempre es un placer seguirles. Ustedes dan cátedra no sólo en cuestión legal sino de muchas disciplinas necesarias y además de ética y caballerosidad y correcto lenguaje. ,Muchas gracias! Desde México.

[@michaelwest2388]

I get the feeling that Elaine was constrained by Amber and could not get into a groove. It really seems like she could not operate efficiently, like an anchored boat trying to sail. I get this feeling from her pledge statement. There is no way a lawyer of her expierence chose that wording by accident. As I think on this writing my comment I am more confident Amber would not listen to Elaine and as a result Elaine spent all her efforts trying to clean Ambers messes. That is why Elaine wasted no time before hitting the interview tour. I wouldn't be surprised if Elaine retires after this. I would too after this if I was in her place.

[@mandycmorris]

I too have always thought Elaine will retire. I also think she had a problematic relationship with AH and was intimidated and frustrated by her. The PR rounds she did following the fail were as much for her reputation as for Amber

[@michaelwest2388]

@@mandycmorris I am not sure about intimidated but she was definitely frustrated by AH. You do have a valid point about the tour being to try and salvage her own reputation, whatever the reason it failed in my eyes as no better light was shown for either of them to me. Trying to blame the jury, who lost a lot of time and presumably wages for those days, did not help the cause in my opinion. Would have been better to shut the $

[@Spangletiger]

"Pledged" 🤣🤣🤣

[@jenniferreed9992]

YOU BROUGHT HIM UP!!!! Dershowitz good eye!

[@paulrandles5249]

Absolutely brilliant content. I have been a volunteer CitA adviser helping clients with employment law issues for nearly 30 years and I thoroughly enjoy the insight and anecdotes, which always reflects my experience and enhances my kmowledge . The Ring door bell privacy arguments and Siri's audio bomb prompt a question about privacy issues relating to Siri, Alexa etc.. Do you have concerns that an AI systmenin your office could undermine Adviser/client confidentiality? CitA's polciy and my personal view is that these devices should always be switched off when exploring anything that might include information that could identify a client.

[@TWINEINZ]

Are you planning on doing an analysis on JD appeal? And what they may use for him having been held accountable for Waldman's comments?

[@syon600]

I like Alan n his Yorkshire accent. Yours is the only channel that explains the law that I have found. Thanks

[@cyankirkpatrick5194]

I like the detective on the Brit series when he says luck runs out eventually. As soon as my coffers allows I might join as well as other channels I didn't say I would, I said might.

[@lesleyanne1156]

High5 Elaine I say,well said miss bredehoft 👏