Battlefield 2025 BATTLE ROYALE CONFIRMED!

[@Snekul_Xfire11]

Modern setting with the BF1/V grit is all I want. BFV’s movement too !

[@NateJRSatt]

BF3 movement was better. It didn't feel like you were floating on air, and no bullshit sliding etc. Shit was unrealistic AF

[@deathstarxxx]

​@NateJRSatt BF3 movement was good at the time but it is outdated and way to slow. New game should movement similar to BFV/2042

[@BourbonBandit-]

What was gritty about bfv?

[@Snekul_Xfire11]

@@BourbonBandit- The environment. The dirty characters, the debris, the background, the mud, etc. 2042 was literally the cleanest Battlefields ever. Especially post launch, my god the levels look like they skipped an entire step of final touches to make it look war torn.

[@albertosgr9]

@@NateJRSatt I agree they should go with the movement of BF3-BF1 and make grounded and realistic

[@alejonicolaslignac9142]

I've been saying this for years, especially after they bottled Firestorm. A well made free to play BR made by Battlefield would absolutely dominate the FPS genre. I think it could easliy dethrone Warzone in it's current state. Think about it. A Battlefield BR in a gritty modern setting, classes, destruction, vehicle combat, huge sandbox environment, etc. It's the perfect recipe for potentially the best BR ever made. If Ripple Effect nails the excecution, then Battlefield is onto a winner.

[@zeusman5195]

I'm very hopeful that it's good. If it's good I will 100% switch.

[@HabballSeph]

If they do they better keep the skins realistic or this will quickly turn into cod

[@Steeveerson]

they keep failing because they keep putting minimal effort into the spinoff modes

[@tuna-2779]

I just hope the servers and netcode are good. If we get all that, its a winner

[@SaygeZachy]

Unpopular opinion but I think a lot of people love battlefield because it’s battlefield not a battle royal game. They just want to bring in a new audience and this decision might turn out very bad for them.

[@thepeps101]

How about we make a good BF game first and then we have the cod kiddy warzone mode if it works out?

[@lumbagoboi1649]

Yeah this news really lowered my hype. Battle Royale literally goes against everything battlefield stands for. No teams, on your own using random weapons. Plus battle Royale just invites stupid looking skins which kill immersion.

[@TheSvDuje]

word !

[@Swake_au]

@@lumbagoboi1649 I think one thing people need to understand, or accept, is EA needs to make money (I say 'needs', as the game won't exist otherwise). It's possible for Dice to make a great Battlefield game, while EA makes money, but it will come with some compromises. Micro transactions and silly skins is one of them. Otherwise you'd need to accept either a higher entry fee for the base game, or some sort of ongoing subscription.

[@JTCBoss1]

Firestorm was very unique and good with destruction and beautiful frostbite graphics. Modern, free to play, & updated firestorm would be insane.

[@TheTacticalBrit]

People underestimate it because it wasn't properly supported by dice. But to this day, it does unique things other BRs don't do

[@Thatliluglydude]

​@@TheTacticalBritit was perfect, it failed due to the paywall

[@mcl40000]

i dont really care bout BR titles...but having a free to play battlefield lets me try the game and see how it does before buying it. so heck yeah, give the BR crowd what they need!

[@sujimayne]

@@mcl40000 I've always liked game modes with multiple teams and random elements. I remember Squad Deathwatch, enjoyed that a lot.

[@walkerdarin2003]

I'd build a new PC if Dice would get their shit together. I'll wait it out.

[@kingjams]

If Battlefield can get it right it would dominate, it needs to launch with a top tier map, the map is so important, dynamic weather is a feature that needs to be added in BR games, snow, sandstorms, option to play day or night time BR so thermal scopes can be utilised. Do not put slide cancelling or bunny hop into the game. Improve the aesthetics of buildings, some of the sky scrappers look weak.

[@RobAddison86]

Battlefield couldn't even get Battlefield right, not to mention adding a BR. They should just focus on getting one project done properly before adding another.

[@kingjams]

@@RobAddison86 I know Battlefield 2042 wasn't a big hit, lot of hype for mid, but apart from that have the other previous Battlefield games been good?

[@RobAddison86]

@kingjams hard-line was barely a battlefield. BF5 only seems good in retrospect after 2042. BF4 at launch wasn't playable, it was a disaster. Come to think of it, I can't remember a launch that was acceptable. Let's just focus on getting this game at a reasonable level before they add any trend chasing.

[@capolean2902]

@@RobAddison86hardline was just cops and robbers still had the battlefield elements and even added sum u see in newer battlefields.

[@RobAddison86]

@capolean2902 what elements?

[@MicahHeard]

Dear Dice, We do not need a thousand buildings. Give us several memorable poi’s and we’re good.

[@MicahHeard]

@@ancientslav4863 I’m a blackout and Warzone 1 vet thru and thru. The only new map I like since verdansk is Vondel. Yeah there’s a lot of apartments but most of the map is easily learnable poi’s, kinda like a smaller verdansk. Urzikstan is the worst map ever. I’ll never play it again. It’s just random buildings, very hard to remember. If dice released a destructible Verdansk style map, we’d be in br heaven.

[@WojtekCzaderna]

It just hit me...this will be Battlefield 7 as this is what you get from adding 3 + 4 :D It needs to be the sign!

[@W1gglePuppy]

Or 5 + 2 which I would prefer 😂

[@danemyburgh]

Or... Battlefield 2025 since its coming out end of 2025? 🤔

[@jacobfield4848]

PUBG, Apex and Resurgence are 3 of the most played online games and they are all Battleroyales.

[@nossy232323]

And they are not Battlefield, because it's a different type of game.

[@sujimayne]

​@@nossy232323Fortnite was also supposed to be a co-op survival game...

[@Moss_and_Such]

Battlefield was like “man we really dropped the ball by chasing old trends last release, let’s chase even older trends.”

[@Moss_and_Such]

@@paulhancock You’re not wrong. if we’re being honest with ourselves though, do we really think under EA, BF won’t be monetized to a similar extent? If the next BFs BR is a crisp grounded military shooter without dumb skins, I’ll happily give them my money.

[@TheTacticalBrit]

Calling BR a trend is kind of wild really. When you factor in the most played games in the world presently are all BRs.

[@tomsco7]

@@TheTacticalBrit What games are those? top 10 in Steam charts has one Battle royal in the top 10 played games of 2024 (PUBG) and we don't get console numbers so, where do you get the info that the most played game in the world are BRs?

[@Moss_and_Such]

@@TheTacticalBrit But Mr Tactical Brit, that’s exactly why I called it a trend, as game Trended towards battle royals?

[@TheTacticalBrit]

Call of duty is the most played title over the last month. Fortnite was second. Both of those on Xbox and PlayStation. The estimated daily concurrent playercount for Fortnite is still over 1M. Apex is also one of the most played titles that doesn't feature on steam. All dwarf every FPS in the space. ​@@tomsco7

[@G82M4Comptish]

I hope it's gonna be like bf3 and bf4 those were the best battlefield games IMO

[@DaryoushNekooi]

I agree with your point on finding the balance with the pacing of a Battle Royale, but I would also say that the design intent of "slow or sparse player to player interactions" is not for it to be boring and uneventful, it's to create tension for the moments when you do see/engage with another player. I think Battlefield is positioned perfectly to find a balance between PUBG and Warzone, being almost bang in the middle. That's exciting to me and not necessarily for the big "battlefield moments" we've come to expect and love from classic BF, but for something more tactical and strategic than warzone, as well as, something more polished and orthogonal than pubg. Great video, really excited to see what BF shows off soon and I hope they don't try to "capture the warzone audience" with their BR, but make something of their own that's unique and special. I think if they can stay in their lane and do what they think is right, rather than what they think they need to do to convert warzone/pubg users, we'll get exactly what we're hoping for

[@nolifebr]

Damn, I hadn't thought about the possibility of having classes in BR. It could be interesting to "force" each person of a squad choose a class before the match starts.

[@HM-ky6xp]

Instead of buying people back like Warzone you’d have to rely on the medic to get his defibrillators out and revive them ? So much potential Scorestreaks from bf5 and fortifications

[@Sfishh]

glad to hear that. Battlefield and battle royal really fit together if they do it well

[@jasungraham8325]

Let's fucking gooooo !!!

[@raptonsoul2557]

Another comment I thought of is what about a br that uses normal servers on a browser and ways to keep people in the lobby in terms of mechanics and little things

[@leo6d985]

A BR with battlefield systems would be very interesting. A very grounded BR that focused more on the BR/survive aspect of the game mode and not cod style. Imagine you and your buddies with different classes and trying to survive other teams. They could do something very nice.

[@capolean2902]

hopefully they allow us to walk in the vehicles instead of holding a key button.

[@raptonsoul2557]

45 guns is surprisingly a lot for a bf game and hope they have a lot of weapon categories but not shared between classes

[@JoeZocktGames]

Bet your butt that half of them are re-used assets from 2042, because why would DICE not use the already finished work?

[@raptonsoul2557]

@@JoeZocktGames if they do the models will have some changes mostly in animation like between bf1 to bf5 if they doe do that, hoping the pp-2000 is their at launch

[@ranmoru456]

@@raptonsoul2557 I’d prefer that weapon categories be shared between classes (some if not all) tbh. Else certain classes are gonna be massively underutilized in some maps under certain situations (e.g. being spawned camp in an enclosed CQC map)

[@thebodykeepsthescore2828]

​@raptonsoul2557 There at launch*

[@paulhancock]

It's not like BR is a new thing but there are definitely new ideas they can bring. Warzone has completely lost its way with ridiculous characters and skins and has no rivals, so if Battlefield can deliver a military-focused, serious BR with a great map (or several) and proper anti-cheat it will be a big success. Warzone fatigue is a real thing. The competition will only force Warzone to get their act together so it's good for everyone. It wouldn't surprise me if Delta Force released a BR at some point too... I think they can all smell blood in the water with Warzone, especially when you see the absolute mess of the Warzone World Series - That is a badly run company taking its eye off the ball. They've had things their own way for too long.

[@samuelchacra9026]

Great point about an action packed mid game. If they can get a meta that’s a tier less sweaty than cod they could really have a golden goose here imo

[@justadude420]

Sounds great ... but i just want a game that fully works at launch...

[@thebodykeepsthescore2828]

Lets just hope they dont neglect multiplayer for the free battle royale. Like call of duty does right now

[@kedziormsz]

that is all i needed ! hype lvl over9000

[@Nick_Thorne]

Me "There's a camper in that building" BOOOOOM My mate "What building? There's no building there"

[@Thatliluglydude]

Warzone sweats wouldn't even know what him them..... literally

[@Errburritoes]

I just hope they don't rush it out not finished, please feel like bf1 in modern times 🙏🙏🙏

[@scotty2shotty]

This is incredible news! I’ve been dying for BF to release a BR!

[@I-nepukka-I]

I want a Battlefield BR :) always wanted! Too bad no one plays firestorm

[@DJPUPPETMASTER-RESURRECTED-]

LMFAO its gonna fail

[@cojo51]

The good servers do sound exciting, but my main concern is the match making. My group is stuck in the blender that is Warzone match making. Ever since the start of season 5, we hardly get a win per week. I hope this game does it better.

[@ricadesign16]

I hope they balance team members between matches too like they used to do in other Battlefield games

[@microzan2231]

I would love to see a battle royale that didn't have a loot system and you came in with a load out.

[@KrazyKhris]

As long as none of it has a hero shooter element in the game, they’ll have a potential banger.

[@ranimdude]

Halvoy was a really great map and I hope they either bring it back or just make something similar. Most likely neither. But i atleast want the BR to be firestorm 2. I always loved the zone being a ring of fire

[@MightiestBeard]

Two thoughts; One, I hope the micro-destruction doesn't turn the game into an M240B-only game, just BLASTING any structure hoping to hit someone inside. And two, I really dislike the loadouts in Warzone. I think finding stuff and scraping by with what you can scavenge is way more interesting than just rushing to the buy station and picking up your most favored meta gun. I think Firestorm was actually great, so I hope they just expand on that. Hell, I'd even love to see like "Firestorm Weekends" every now and then where they bring back Firestorm with progression that carries over into the 2025 game or something. BRs get stagnant because the meta gets solved and the map stays the same for months. Just need quicker iteration on both.

[@RG4WLCGAMING]

Great informative video!

[@Jargon]

Just a correction: in Pubg you can absolutely move a downed teammate

[@sirsamuelpaulo]

Excellent news. A battlefield BR is exactly what we need. Put that alongside a good core multiplayer and I couldn’t be happier.

[@PureStoneee]

no one cares about fucking br

[@RobAddison86]

I'm abit reluctant to believe, even though it's multiple studios, that they can manage the resources to pull of 2 great projects. They couldn't even pull off a half decent single project last time.

[@TheTacticalBrit]

The most popular games in the world would disagree with "nobody cares about BR"

[@PureStoneee]

@@TheTacticalBrit they are so over saturated in the market. i know its all you and westie play though so there might be some bias

[@PureStoneee]

@@TheTacticalBrit also not every game needs one nor do we need any more. bf has failed at this twice. no one is asking for a new br either

[@TylerOstergaard]

This might be a unpopular opinion but I really liked BFV BR. The gunplay and destruction was amazing it sucked it was behind a paywall

[@noahmcclellan4372]

Firestorm was incredible they doomed it but being buy to play,horrible looting, and stopping updates.

[@TylerOstergaard]

@@noahmcclellan4372 ya that is true and unfortunate :(

[@lotusflowerrr]

Warzone is living on borrowed time. Main idea that they will be destruction and free to play means endless possibilities to win a round. And people like variety...

[@Camerooonify]

BR is not the way to go at all. They just need to follow the formula set out in battlefield 3 and 4, with better graphics, more guns, standard classes, lots of decent maps, planes and helicopters you can actually take off in and land again (no more spawning in the air SIGH) and huge destructibility. Dont chase any COD or PUBG trends. Just go back to what battlefield is really good at and it will print money. Just feels like they never learn.

[@JamesWick99]

I really hope it releases with a respawn mode, kinda like how warzone released with plunder

[@theripefruit4343]

got me hyped but i want them to do an extraction shooter and great gun customization

[@theborgster8497]

Uggh, all the Warzone/COD tryhards will infest this game as well

[@Catch_u_reloadn]

A battle royale for Battlefield holy cow❤

[@patricktiefenbacher]

Yesss!! Now i will give Battlefield a try! 👍🏻

[@findingsearchingthinking]

I had a feeling that fire looked a little too much like firestorm

[@colonelangus2580]

Definitely take out loadouts and make it ground loot and attachments.

[@mamulator]

If they make crossplay with pc optional, they will put a huge dent in the warzone playerbase on day one. Personally Id be done with warzone if they did that.

[@albertosgr9]

If you think slow pace tactical gameplay is boring then you are not an actual fan of battlefield.If the battlefield becomes a clone of Warzone then what will their differences be between those games?? The answer is zero they will be the same BR game mode with Fortnite bunny hop slide cancelling where every kid plays the same way.What battlefield needs to do is stick to the good formula which is BF1 and BF3 grounded and realistic gameplay

[@tomgillotti]

💯💯💯

[@theendurance]

bf has never been slow lol, go back and play bf3 or bc2, its super fast gameplay, compared to ACTUAL slow paced tactical shooters like insurgency or arma.

[@TheTacticalBrit]

Battlefield isn't a milsim and never has been beyond Battlefield 2. Bf3/4 and all bad company titles always kept you in the action

[@albertosgr9]

@@TheTacticalBrit BF is something In between not Arcady and neither a mil slim.BF1 is a great example of how the next battlefield should be in terms of atmosphere,action,immersion and movement.Adding unnecessary things like sliding or crazy movement in battlefield it will ruin battlefield identity and it will be a wanna be cod just like 2042

[@albertosgr9]

@@theendurance BF1 is a great example of how the battlefield should have always been.Great atmosphere,immersion,grounded and kinda realistic movement.I know Bf3 was kinda fast but compared to todays battlefield it’s not that fast

[@HaydenBigler97]

Here’s what we need out of the next game. BF3 Maps and battle sounds, BF4 gun and camo quantity, BF1 grit, BFV movement, gun play, score streaks and fortifications, and 2042 Plus system. (The only good thing 2042 did. lol)

[@HM-ky6xp]

Bf5 fortifications and score streaks also

[@bigfoot9049]

Squad limit needs to go up a bit as well, I'd say 5 or 6

[@user-ne9sd4ow1o]

Don't forget BFBC2 humour!

[@albertosgr9]

No get rid off unrealistic movement completely.What the game needs is grounded and realistic movement and not a copy paste arcade movement like cod

[@noahmcclellan4372]

​@@HM-ky6xpTHIS

[@bumblefoot5]

All I ever wanted was a bf battle royale

[@andrewjudd1978]

Was hoping for extraction shooter like DMZ

[@Surgeeon]

Let’s just hope it doesn’t feel like absolute dog water on mouse

[@toxicgracie3772]

What is dog water

[@Surgeeon]

@@toxicgracie3772 would u drink dog water from a bowl?

[@toxicgracie3772]

@@Surgeeon Probably not, unless I was dying from thirst

[@Surgeeon]

@@toxicgracie3772 and why wouldn’t u ?

[@toxicgracie3772]

@@Surgeeon It's warm and unsanitary. Why would you?

[@yak-machining]

I hope golmud rail returns

[@pas50cal-63]

Really hope they do not include controller AIMBOT like cod has.

[@perjacobsen8445]

I liked firestorm, but want a better and more interesting map with a modern setting. That would be fire!

[@andrewbunyan8083]

USA + tropical is surely Hawaii, no? Lends itself to being an island?

[@OGSuperDirty]

No, too small

[@Madjock56]

I for one loved firestorm and bf5 hope it happens is sounds like it going in the right way defo not being caught with preordering like 2042 never again

[@Thatliluglydude]

Firestorm was so good

[@tomgillotti]

Give me PUBG Battlefield and I’ll be happy. I don’t agree that the PUBG mid game is lackluster and boring. I like the pacing of PUBG and having some time to “breath” between engagements. Sometimes, it’s an opportunity to re-group, and if you’re bringing a squad mate back, it’s a chance for them to get properly kitted again. I also like that I can have a genuine conversation with someone at those points where the battle slows down a bit. Time to talk about strategy and positioning. Occasionally, that’s interrupted by an unexpected fight, or some other influence (finding a key to better loot) that’s always fun to deal with. PUBG is still one of the most played games on Steam nearly 8 years after release. It’s simple and does one thing very well… that’s what makes it great. I do wish they would remove the Korean highlighter colors that have detracted from its more hardcore nature. Speaking of hardcore, I would love to see a dedicated hardcore BR mode, similar to multiplayer. That could be a real opportunity to go after the PUBG loyalists (yes, many of us exist). I’ve always said that Warzone should do that, but it’s COD, so 🤮 I really hope they get this right. An intense, action filled, strategic, and fun BR with some Battlefield magic could be awesome!

[@Catch_u_reloadn]

I can't remember does Battlefield support cross play because I got some friends on Xbox and computer and I want to be able to play with those dudes on this game

[@mackeminfidel2261]

Extraction mode I'd love that

[@VREMEPLOV1]

Tbh, It’s good that they have a dedicated studio for BR only, but I still hope it flops massively; BR mode is not Battlefield; the only reason they are reintroducing it is because of Warzone’s success. Let Warzone be Warzone, and those who want to play BR can play that, or any other BR title that’s already on the market. Battlefield should focus on its successful predecessors. Making a game for everyone might lead to making it for no one. Please just stick to OG Battlefield.

[@superfly9965]

@@VREMEPLOV1 you must suck at be or something? They can put their own spin on it, specifically with the armor vehicles that are very much a part of the bf. Honestly it sounds very cool 😎

[@bjornhaakon4771]

BR is so overused and not fun saying this coming from Fortnite rank, and Apex legends, and PUBG closed beta! I hope they add a good extraction shooter instead as a single player mode; it is more exciting like Arc Raiders!

[@captainslow7876]

Unfortunately due to previous experiences I’d wait.

[@baholete]

Pleaseeeeeeee!!!! don't force mouse players to play against aimbot controller players. They can play against each other and we can play against each other, easy, everybody happy

[@jonathanthomas4498]

Man it needs loadouts and way better and realistic compared to warzone

[@nossy232323]

That's at least one part of BF I will skip. Let's hope it will have some good parts too.

[@HM-ky6xp]

Let’s get creative what’s peoples idea for how a battlefield battle royale will look ?

[@mikefrey5039]

Way to do what no one asked for again! Who cares about a mode that has already failed. They said they are "going back to BF3/4" roots because it was the best time and the pinnacle of the BF franchise. This isn't that. Focus on bringing back the vehicles, weapons, gadgets, and map styles that work, bring back great vehicle selection(like interesting vehicles for example, the MLRS), bring back mortars for the support class. Bring back the bomber stations and ac-130(a proper gunship). Bring back the strategically placed semi-auto .50 cal sniper rifles. And for the love of all things BF, lower the ttk and make realism a priority. It took me 5 shots from a 35mm auto cannon on an lav to kill a single infantry bot. That's absurd. What's the point of a vehicle if it has equivalent firepower to a rifle? It's ridiculous. And I know this isn't a DICE or EA page so please don't mind my "letter to the editor" writing style. I am just so disgusted by how far they have strayed from the path that made these games so fun, interesting, and, moreover, continuously playable. There are some fantastic modern weapons, gadgets, vehicles, and systems that BF can bring to this title, I just hope they really mean what they said about going back to their "roots".

[@Shurredz]

If they get it right, this could be the biggest BR release since Warzone. Maybe even bigger because of how much this audience wants a BR and how amazing it would be in the battlefield environment. I mean, imagine the clips we’ve gotten throughout battlefield, now imagine that in the realm of a BR 🤌🏼😮‍💨

[@IGI_Media]

"My game, so i wanna play my way" mentality

[@user-ne9sd4ow1o]

Florida Battlefield BR sounds really fun actually!! 😅 The genre is too sweaty.

[@TheDustmeister88]

Florida Battle Royale? You've got my attention. What is that? Does everyone in the player circle get free hits of crack? Meth?

[@MrTomeeboy64]

BR ain't for me. I'm there for the true Battlefield experience which BR isn't. Supply, kill, die, respawn and go again the BF3/BF4 way .Fingers crossed ✝️ 😊

[@edisnipes]

LETS GOOOOOO!

[@flippakitten]

10:26 "Hint" reg is what COD uses. Bullets actually land in BF

[@jimmyharris6029]

Just give us bf4/3 color pallets and grit and I don’t care about the rest

[@joahansen2011]

Watch out! Hisoka 2 time BR champion in different games

[@jamesdylan1522]

PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEAAAAAASEEEEEEEE.... NO CROSSPLAY. Or at least give us the option to turn crossplay OFF!!!!!!!

[@ytpr9420]

Imagine calling out that you're landing at Biscayne Boulevard in Miami lol!

[@wilber1982]

They are at least saying the right things hopefully they can deliver not enjoyed an BF since battlefield 1. BR would be interesting 1 thing they have always managed to do better the cod is server performance.

[@robwilson1239]

🤞 they get it right!

[@szakacsattila9985]

Remember! Don't pre-order!

[@Zet666pl]

As a long time bf player there is no mode im less interested than a battle royale. Let's face it BF is dead. They will fk it's corpse for a while still until it's dead for good.

[@oldchannel1262]

Honestly this is kinda disappointing for me. I'm so sick of BR i wish it would all just die. Also Tom has been incorrect though. His hit piece on XDefiant was completely false and he seems to have let his opinion of the game sway his reporting on it.

[@gennarosantaniello3845]

Please dont tell me battlefield is becoming cod i liked battlefield because of his modalities

[@jacobfield4848]

"Free to play" or it will fail.

[@TheTacticalBrit]

It is

[@BobcatHunter522]

Being free means……. Cheaters cheaters and more cheaters just watch it be ruined. Unless they have a special anti cheat that literally watches ur system while playing

[@LawOfEvolution]

Who is still asking for a Battle Royale game? No like seriously.... who?

[@TheTacticalBrit]

Its the most played format of fps

[@LawOfEvolution]

@TheTacticalBrit it's because they are free, not because the market is begging for BR. If Traditional MP was free and BR was paid content the role would be reversed as far as 'most played'.

[@jamesgill2033]

So the franchise is broken enough and now you bring in a game mode that Battlefield players didn't ask for. People play Battlefield to get away from battle royale.

[@Batzako]

Let’s gooooooooooooo

[@vidarCRC]

Yay...not. But well if it brings more people to the game is ok I guess. I want Battlefield, couldn't care less for BR...just hope they make a good base game and don't waste a lot of resources in a battle royale no one is going to play behind a paywall as they did with Firestorm.

[@RyneLanders]

Nah, no battle royale. I think it makes sense in the Battlefield framework, but as we've seen with Apex Legends and Warzone, when they focus on the BR the core game dies. I'm much more interested in a big BF3-4 type of experience vs seeing it die because of the focus on the BR.

[@EarCandyContraption]

Just bring back Wake island. Please.

[@jonathanthomas4498]

I want a br

[@RandomDude1842]

Florida Royale

[@tomgillotti]

YESSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!

[@tr1pl741]

Battle Royale has nothing new to offer , how about an additional extraction looter mode that can compete with Delta Force.

[@christssoulwinner188]

battle royale modern infantry

[@dennissmith6096]

I’m all for a BR but free to play? It’s a huge mistake. Sure it will have players but like COD it’ll just be full of cheaters. Another problem with this business type is pay to win. I’d love to find a game like World of Warcraft’s subscription model where if you cheat there’s something to loose and you can have better servers as your paying for a service. Free to play they justify micro transactions, pay to win, cheaters( because they add to player count), and sub par servers because why are you complaining it’s free.