Being-in-itself | Sartre | Being & Nothingness

[@SingularityasSublimity]

To support this work, please consider providing a one-time tip through the "Super Thanks" option above. You can also be an ongoing supporter as a Patreon member, where you can obtain transcripts and unedited materials: www.patreon.com/SingularSublime

[@brucecmoore2881]

Congrats on your 4k subs!

[@SingularityasSublimity]

Thank you 😊 Got something planned for a 5k celebration, perhaps in late August of so.

[@brucecmoore2881]

Thank you!

[@brucecmoore2881]

Thank you again!

[@monaosman7471]

I'm trying to read sartre's introduction to 《being and nothingness》

[@monaosman7471]

will you please write the lecture

[@OdoItal]

Been reading a lot of Hegel recently, and it occurs to me that Heidegger's ontic aligns with what is called 'particular' in Hegel, and what is ontological with what is 'universal.' just a possible link, may not be a one to one match. Anyways, great video!!

[@SingularityasSublimity]

There is undoubtedly a connection as Hegel looms large for Heidegger. The question that interests me is, given the evident similarities and influences, is: how does Heidegger handle the dialectic of particular and universal differently than Hegel?

[@OdoItal]

@@SingularityasSublimity yes I'm wondering this as well. I think Heidegger has a lecture series on phen of spirit that was published. So the details should be there. But I also wonder not what he explicitly thinks about hegel but what he takes from hegel that is not explicitly stated or admitted to.

[@OdoItal]

Though admittedly the alignment of universal/particular to ontic/ontology is probably unfruitful/hasty. Being is a universal. But all kinds of universals must be operative in ontic considerations as well.

[@monaosman7471]

Will you please write on screen Your explain is excellent but we do not speak English and try to follow so have bad need for this writing please

[@SingularityasSublimity]

When you say “writing” do you mean subtitles?