Thank you for this great review of the new Antares 12, Jack! It was a pleasure having you onboard !
@albertpenello8 ай бұрын
I was able to get on this boat at FLIBS and loved it. Been waiting for Jack and YachtBuyer to get this video up!
@Yachtbuyer8 ай бұрын
Sorry to keep you waiting, hope it was worth the wait! 😆
@jeffmcallister70408 ай бұрын
Beneteau's Antares line is fantastic. Love the short and sweet reviews you've been doing. 👍
@Yachtbuyer8 ай бұрын
Thanks Jeff, appreciate that! - Jack
@neilchapman40378 ай бұрын
Love it. Quality tour and edit. More please 😊
@seanogden9278 ай бұрын
A very nice yacht, some nice features and details. Triple engines for me it just looks more awesome. Great tour Jack thank you.
@Yachtbuyer8 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it, Sean, thanks! - Jack
@albertpenello8 ай бұрын
For sure the twin V10. Cheaper to maintain, slightly better fuel economy (per Beneteau's own testing), similar range but the price difference is not worth the slight increase in speed. Even better, take the savings from the 3rd engine and get a set of Sharrow Props and economy goes up even more and you'd close the gap in acceleration.
@JLAR2RVA8 ай бұрын
This!
@BilldalSWE8 ай бұрын
Outboards on a boat like this is just stupid... Dual Diesel inboards would give you much better fuel economy and a large swim platform which would also be a place for storing a tender.
@albertpenello8 ай бұрын
@@BilldalSWE I mean - OK. You're going to pay more for inboards, lose interior space, and have higher maintenance cost and less performance. If range and fuel economy is your only consideration then inboards is the way to go. I have no interest in inboard powered boats and my use case is not super long-range cruising so I'm really glad to have a larger boat with outboard power. Seems like there are other companies going this way so I can't be the only one.
@BilldalSWE8 ай бұрын
@@albertpenello You were the one mentioning fuel economy and the fact a slight increase in performance was not worth it. Otherwise I wouldn't have commented. Also as an example of performance , dual 440hp Volvo Penta D6 takes a Sargo 36 fly which is the same weight (20000lb/9000kg)as this Antares up to 42 knots and has a higher combined torque of 2000Nm compared to only 1275Nm for 3x300 Verados which (with the duoprops) means better acceleration. The loss of storage space under the cockpit floor is definitely a good point but not one that overweighs the loss of the swimplatform and dingy storage as I've never met someone with a 40+ ft flybridge boat who didn't run a dinghy.
@joelouis72198 ай бұрын
Great presentation, as always. Thank you very much
@Yachtbuyer8 ай бұрын
Our pleasure!
@colinturner41588 ай бұрын
I think this is a excellent practical boat for the money thanks Jack
@javiermarques46578 ай бұрын
The Antares is ok, but which boat is the blue one on the other side?
@cookiemonster22998 ай бұрын
Very smart boat, twin V10's please. 😜 Loved the start of the vid very cool. 👍❤️🇬🇧
@brianunderwood31098 ай бұрын
Nice job Jack. I'd be happy with either, but I'd do the triple 300 mostly for resale value.
@MrDLYouTube8 ай бұрын
Is there any benefit to having trippel outboards? Top speed okay, but the difference is not that big from 2. Personally cruising range is more important.
@flycht8 ай бұрын
Put in a couple of Volvo diesel and you are better of.
@albertpenello8 ай бұрын
Speed. Fuel economy is *slightly* worse with 3 V8 vs 2 v10, but the boat is faster to plane and a higher top speed. Cruising range is about the same with both engines.
@Muttonbird8 ай бұрын
Another superb review video Jack. Always a pleasure to watch. Certainly a-lot of boat and innovation for the $ with the Antares 12. Probably go with the twin engines and get the bow thruster integrated into the remote. Now, Your fur-lined Crocs.... I've found some on your recommendation. Did you find to had to go up a size? Looking forward to your next video.
@Yachtbuyer8 ай бұрын
Thank you, appreciate the kind words! I had to revert to standard Crocs as the fur took a beating! Enjoy them while they’re fresh - Jack
@jay6115-t6y8 ай бұрын
You are very relatable. Always enjoy your work!
@Yachtbuyer8 ай бұрын
That’s kind of you to say, thank you - Jack
@cbrusharmy8 ай бұрын
I quite like this.
@RichardBurch8 ай бұрын
Beneteau ! One of the BEST!
@texas2cv3 ай бұрын
I wonder if there is a tender attachment for this vessel? Other than towing it.
@maxmcgraw35718 ай бұрын
The only thing I would question is the TV right behind the hub. Cooking may cause splattering on to the screen. Plus, it blocks the window. Of course, and I don't believe you said either way, If the TV is retractable... That would make sense.
@preussensgloria8 ай бұрын
It is, you can see the cover on the top
@maxmcgraw35718 ай бұрын
Thank you for clarifying that 😉
@maxmcgraw35718 ай бұрын
And by the way... I absolutely love your channel. You have your own unique way of giving tours. Definitely a lot better than most!
@Yachtbuyer8 ай бұрын
Great to hear Max, thank you! - Jack
@jodevogeleer71858 ай бұрын
Idd I read that 2engines could be enough for normal cruising. Still I am very curious to see a test with oce 300 hp twin diesel outboards with sharrow props on it.......
@albertpenello8 ай бұрын
I bet just sharrow props on the V10's would help a lot. The money you save in buying 2 V10's vs 3 V8's more than pays for a set of Sharrow props and you get better economy and probably close the gap on speed an acceleration as well.
@maryholder37958 ай бұрын
Antares range of boats are practical, the galley is well thought out all the seats are flexible in their use. Décor is tasteful, a good contrast between white and wood. Expensive for me yes, but if you have the money then she is definitely worth a look, and buy.
@Yachtbuyer8 ай бұрын
Great summary! 💪
@nasosnasos80548 ай бұрын
Love
@Joe_1sr98 ай бұрын
Twin engines here🎉
@BilldalSWE8 ай бұрын
Outboards on a boat like this is just stupid... Dual Diesel inboards would give you much better fuel economy and a large swim platform which would also be a place for storing a tender.
@clifbradley8 ай бұрын
Twin 400's would be the better option. A lot of people don't know that those engines actually burn less fuel than the 300's. But the 300's are also very fuel efficient. However 2 engines pushing 800hp vs 3 engines pushing 900hp, you have to account for the extra weight of that engine so it isn't giving you the full 900 so it would cost more to habe an extra engine that is pushing marginal extra power. Not worth it. Put some Sharrow props on them 400's and really get fuel savings
@albertpenello8 ай бұрын
Twin 400 is available - Beneteau has the fuel economy and it actually favors the V10 slightly - at the expense of top speed.
@fishtigua8 ай бұрын
Hi Jack, twin 400's will save about £1000 a year in servicing. Not a small amount of dosh.
@Yachtbuyer8 ай бұрын
Good point 👍 - J
@togethrs5 ай бұрын
Hi I am very interested in a boat like this but curious if you have come across any FB/CB boats like this that have a fishing package. Mainly rod holder and rocket launcher (upper rod storage) and maybe convertible cooler live well. I feel like this would be a great option here in south Florida. Some luxurious trolling. Ty!
@charliegollmar62598 ай бұрын
It doesn't look like that TV drops down so it doubles as a backsplash when you're cooking on the stove top?
@Yachtbuyer8 ай бұрын
It does drop down into the galley unit - Jack
@Nezzer578 ай бұрын
Another great review Jack 👍This has tough competition from the Jeneau/Merry Fisher 1295, but i think this seems to be a bit higher quality spec? Re your question, heart says triple 300's, the head, and wallet, says twin V10 400's...
@Yachtbuyer8 ай бұрын
Yep, there’s some good stuff in that sector! - J
@harlansnyder80708 ай бұрын
The video quality does not do this boat justice. Might be time for a higher resolution camera. Love the boat, and the host is great!
@seikibrian86416 ай бұрын
I'm watching it in 4k/2160P. Not sure about you.
@matthewmartin19708 ай бұрын
Strange place for the TV it's going to get filthy behind the stove (unless it's a hi low unit) and can't be seen if anyone is cooking, also the grill on the flybridge is right behind the helm so the back of that seat will be covered in grease in no time.
@Yachtbuyer8 ай бұрын
The saloon TV does retract 👍
@clbclb99888 ай бұрын
Hey I love your videos, but this price class is still to high for most of us😅. Can you maybe start a series with used yachts? Would be awesome!
@utooboobnoob8 ай бұрын
What’s your profession? Would you mind changing your job if I ask nicely?
@scottdynek27288 ай бұрын
Twin's for power!
@rtbinc22738 ай бұрын
Thanks Jack. The Joy Stick for Mercury can integrate the bow thruster. It's nice to know that a $680K boat crawls up towards a Million with a seakeeper. They seem to be an popular but expensive option.
@albertpenello8 ай бұрын
I asked about this an unfortunately that feature isn't implemented here. They aren't using the variable-speed bow thrusters which integrate yet.
@JoseVazquez-nw9hi8 ай бұрын
😍😍😍
@ijv55678 ай бұрын
it keeps switching from 1080p to 4k
@maxmcgraw35718 ай бұрын
I find it odd that the beds in the Twin cabin, and VIP cabin is down on the floor. Wouldn't it be more practical to raise the beds up.. even by 10".. and have storage underneath? I believe it would be very difficult to change the bedding also.
@SimonJeffery-g9b8 ай бұрын
Love this cruiser Jack, personally I'd go with the twin engine option, plenty fast enough. Just a thought, but with a cruiser of approx. 12 metres do manufacturers of smaller boats ever consider it would it be better use of space if there's wasn't a flybridge helm? Appreciate though that navigating from the upper helm can be great in the warmer months.
@rtbinc22738 ай бұрын
I'd go for the two engine option. I'm not sure that anyone could notice those few knots difference and there are reduced maintenance costs also. I am amazed by how many boats this size are going for outboards instead of inboards.
@jefforceone8 ай бұрын
Hi jack a while back you did a review of Regal 42 FXO at the time you said it was the only outboard power flybridge well not anymore. This boats so much better. In so many ways two standard bathrooms larger rooms, bigger flybridge if I had one negative thing to say, that it doesn’t come with a hard top I just don’t like Bimini oh p.s would go with-the three engine option
@albertpenello8 ай бұрын
One thing that's missed a lot is the Regal is not only significantly more expensive, but since it was designed as an inboard boat you have a lot less interior space. Boats designed from the start as outboard boats don't have to accommodate for a large engine room. This boat is cheaper and has a lot more room than the Regal.
@decencywarrior95988 ай бұрын
🦋
@alexp89248 ай бұрын
This used to be sub 500k wasnt it? Doesn't seem that interesting when it competes with Targa40 in price.
@nicbennett65548 ай бұрын
Great review Jack. Really like the boat’s use of space and amount of forward facing seating (strangely unusual!). However, to succeed in the UK/Europe I suspect they’ll need to offer inboard diesels!
@clinty518 ай бұрын
Two 400's and keep them well apart, so it runs like a mono but handles like a cat
@doverivermedia39378 ай бұрын
Don't fancy the job of wiping off the bacon grease off that TV 'splash back'... seriously ? ... 🇬🇧
@Yachtbuyer8 ай бұрын
The TV drops into the counter when not in use...
@doverivermedia39378 ай бұрын
@@Yachtbuyer Ah, now it makes sense ! ... Great review as always Jack. 🇬🇧
@SeaVTV48 ай бұрын
Id pick the Galeon 440 fly instead
@albertpenello8 ай бұрын
Great boat for sure, but considerably more expensive then the twin-engine Antares 12, and being an inboard boat you have less space. Galeon makes awesome boats but like the Regal you're going to pay a lot more.
@SeaVTV48 ай бұрын
It definitely boils down to the spec options you put on the boat. Another boat to consider is the MF 1295 Fly, this I believe is the most for your $ in this size flybridge@@albertpenello
@albertpenello8 ай бұрын
@@SeaVTV4 Agree! Interesting you bring up the MF1295. I looked at both boats at FLIBS (along with the Galleon and the Regal) - here's the thing in reality the Antares 12 is a MUCH better deal AND can be had cheaper than the MF1295. Reason is, Jeanneau does not pre-rig the motors so the price they are quoting is without engines. Beneteau (starting with the Antares 12) is pre-rigging the boats from the factory so the price quoted is WITH motors. This saves the customer money in rigging costs from the dealership but makes Antares 12 appear more expensive at first glance. Also, the MF1295 does not offer at 2 motor version, so right off the bat you can get into an Antares 12 for $80K less than the MF1295. The Antares 12 learned a lot of lessons since it came afterward, so the A12 is 1.5 feet longer (adding the gangway in the rear means the cockpit seat does not need to go back to raise the motors, which does happen in the 1295), and there are options not available in the MF1295 like the factory installed inverter and anchor locker wash-down. And finally, the flybridge layout is improved over the 1295 by removing some wasted space up front, moving the helm seat forward (better visibility) and so the Fly on the A12 seems much more spacious than the 1295. I saw both boats back-to-back at FLIBS and got the price sheets on both to compare. The A12 has more standard features and a lower entry point than the 1295 but because of how they talk about "starting at" the MF1295 appears cheaper but it's not.
@SeaVTV48 ай бұрын
@@albertpenello Excellent insight about pre-rigging and 2 outboard option.
@Cinarli19798 ай бұрын
No it is not. Sirena Marine has far better offerings.
@eaglex57238 ай бұрын
I can barely afford a new car. Why the hell am I watching this?!
@DrKlausReichert8 ай бұрын
Is a boat with 800/900 hp a good contender for „best family boat“? Considering it being far far away from being a sustainable solution, adding heavily to climate change, harming the children’s future.