Best Small SUV Comparison 2021: CR-V vs. RAV4 vs. CX-5 vs. Rogue vs. Tucson

[@edmundscars]

Which makes the more dramatic entrance: Tucson or Rogue? Read the full comparison edmu.in/3yMy1ss

[@sleeksilver]

Rogue. I think Hyundai overdid the styling on the Tucson and it doesn't look better in person.

[@knowledgeishere5072]

Tucson. It is industry disruptive. The styling is nicer in person however I do agree that the side view is a bit too busy. It's a nice vehicle though.

[@ascratv4116]

Rogue. Smooth driving, Luxury features like seats have Zero Gravity Seats and two door center console storage with extra storage underneath it. Modern exterior design. Spacious, Doors open up 90°.

[@McDowski]

Tucson, definitely. This is not a segment known for stylish offerings, and the Tucson really stands out as the rare small SUV that's actually a looker.

[@alfredoj1349]

Hyundai all day

[@ssweetener]

Out of the 13 vehicles I’ve owned the CX-5 is only vehicle I’d ever consider buying for a second time. I’ve had my 2018 for 3 years. And I still enjoy it every time I get in.

[@stevenhunter9614]

Same...thats why I'm here ,wondering whether to get the latest model or change!🤔

[@saurabhbhalla90]

I'd get it if the back seats were roomier

[@cgnefarious5785]

@@saurabhbhalla90 You may be interested in the CX-50 coming out in 2023. It's supposed to be a wider, roomier CX-5 from what I can tell. And I think it'll also have a plug-in hybrid option, if that's your jam.

[@Edyth_Hedd]

@@cgnefarious5785 Yeah, I'm excited for the CX-50, as I think it's got nicer proportions than the CX-5.

[@Mrtellitlikeitis]

The base engine of the cx5 is more than enough. Wanna sacrifice mpg big time? Then get the turbo. Ive driven both, and honestly the turbo is only good when getting quickly up to speed on the highway, otherwise u barely ever use it. For my money, the premium package is worth it more than the turbo which is only 40 more ponies. Not worth it

[@Fifthcell]

The CX-5 and Tuscon are probably the two best small crossovers on the market right now. I think the CX-5 is better than the Tuscon because of the powertrain, but they’re both very nice

[@ericclaeyborn7008]

I bought my 2021 CX-5 Carbon Edition Turbo w/ AWD back in March, and I haven't regretted it for a second. The comfort is more than I expected, zooming around town is a pleasure, and I have had no problems finding enough cargo space to haul my groceries, garden/building materials, and etc.. More than once, I've found myself speeding, and not just by a little. The turbo really makes the CX-5 move down the road. I'm able to listen to 1,000s of my favorite songs from my own music library that is stored on a USB flash-drive, too. It's a sweet ride.

[@curlzncrush]

Really happy to read this. I'm waiting to pick mine up next week. I never really understood why some people love driving and used to dread getting behind the wheel, until I test drove the CX-5. Never been happier with a purchase before.

[@MultiScotty24]

I am getting my Carbon Edition this week. Can’t wait

[@jjn6914]

I bought the Tucson Hybrid Limited bc I knew their combustion engine versions were weak, and I LOVE IT SO MUCH! This trim is LOADED w/top tech features and that gorgeous pano roof. For me, it was the best quality and performance ~$40k small SUV I test drove (I tested Toyota, Honda, Hyundai, Volvo) and I already drove it across the country from MA to WA, and it made the trip SO comfortable (I avg'd 35 mpg, cabin is super quiet, and hybrid engine is strong and smooth).

[@markvisser388]

Ask Hyundai to stop hiding issues that may kill you. I wouldn't even consider a Hyundai for free.

[@nj-1008]

Come on, be honest. They charged you a huge mark up on that car.

[@nj-1008]

I get 34-35mpg with my Mazda CX-5 Carbon on the highway. Not a hybrid. FWD and non-turbo.

[@nj-1008]

@@genesong8094 Plug in hybrids have about only about 20 miles of electric before they kick over to gas. That's just not acceptable.

[@Fifthcell]

@@nj-1008 they definitely overpaid. My friend got a 2022 Tuscon standard SEL trim and paid just over 36k for it. MSRP is around 29k when optioned out the same. It’s ridiculous

[@vile4343]

I got the 2018 Honda CRV EX trim, been driven over 82000 miles with no gas in engine or other issues at all, good gas mileage, roomy, and design, not perfect but overall great vehicle, love it.

[@Fr4nK-vr4vi]

2021 Mazda CX-5 Touring with SV Preferred package owner here. I went to the dealerships to test drive all of them, even the VW Tiguan and Kia Sorrento...none of those compares to the handling, acceleration and feel of luxury inside the CX5. Definitely not an ordinary compact SUV; And...it's made in Japan.

[@Mrtellitlikeitis]

Hows the base engine

[@kristians2704]

Exterior - Mazda Interior - Nissan/Mazda Driving - Mazda

[@MrUser999999]

Tech - Hyundai(UI and driver assistance), Nissan digital Gauge cluster

[@kfx3907]

Nope

[@ryankassel5691]

Thank you Carlos. I actually did call my grandpa. I've been having a pretty rough morning but it was really nice to talk to him, and he was really happy that I called. Thanks again my dude

[@CarlosLago]

🙌

[@alistairweaver1336]

Were you nice to your mom too?

[@jetwind72]

I really enjoyed reading all the comments there, probably more revealing than the video itself. All the cars reviewed are excellent in their own right. I am going with the CX-5. Cargo space is not a big issue with me, it can carry my luggage and my groceries. It is only my wife and me. I have been overseas for the past 14 years, and the countries I served in are demanding in my driving abilities. When I return to the USA for vacation, there will be a new CX-5 being shipped to my next destination.

[@darmy713]

That’s what I bought. It’s a great daily driver. I have zero complaints. And no CVT!

[@nj-1008]

I bought the CX-5 Carbon edition. No regrets whatsoever.

[@biggianthead17]

I did too...I own a CX5 and it's like driving a big sporty car. Love that SUV. I also love the RAV4 and I own that one too.

[@alibinali2940]

@@biggianthead17 So which one do you prefer?

[@biggianthead17]

@@alibinali2940 i prefer the Mazda CX5... drives like a dream. The family has gotten bigger by 2 more in the past 2 years so I'll need a bigger unit. I'm looking at the Toyota Highlander or the Mazda CX9.

[@Kmancanada]

What a competitive segment. As a CX-5 owner, I can attest that I consider it to be in a separate category. I never would have selected a car from this category, were it not for the CX-5. It drives like a sports sedan. Moreover, its luxury interior, feel and materials make it more of a competitor for the entry-luxury models like the BMW X1, MB GLA, Lexus UX and NX, etc. In that company, it suddenly becomes the MOST practical and the MOST roomy. In that set, it also has the largest cargo hold, seats up or down, by far. Even in this set, its cargo capacity is not small, it's just the smallest. To keep it in perspective, it is similar to the cargo capacity of the others' from a generation or two ago.

[@ericclaeyborn7008]

I agree with you. I bought a 2021 CX-5 Carbon Edition Turbo w/ AWD, and I have yet to look at my new ride without being able to say,"Sweet!". The Polymetal Gray, black spiked wheels, and red leather seats just does something to me ;). The cargo area is fine for me, and if I need more room, I'll just pull down the backseat. Also, the comfort level is very high when driving around town, or on the highway.

[@Kmancanada]

That polymetal grey is a STUNNER from Mazda. They did an awesome job on that colour.

[@jeffmorse645]

Just bought a 2024 Tucson Limited with the 2.5. It has more than enough power to merge safely and keep up with traffic on Florida's I-95, which is like a racetrack most if the time. I traded in a Subaru Legacy Touring XT for it so I understand what a quick car is. I also test drove the stand engine version of every car in this test. The Tucson is right in there with them accrleration-wise. I don't understand all these reviewers moving about how slow it is. It's not. It's class average. It's also a great value.

[@scottwright7177]

In my opinion, the Mazda CX-5 was far ahead of the others after a real test drive. Even if you don't get the turbo, it will make you wonder why all other compact suv's drive like boats. I thought I would hate not having a touch screen, but now I prefer the CX-5's smooth controls over cleaning fingerprints on my screen.

[@fahmidnd2]

Thank you, people keep asking me why i made the switch from honda to mazda. its just better.

[@pinakmiku4999]

CX-5 is great except cramped rear leg room and less cargo space. Good for individuals but not good for families especially with adult children

[@sidonronaldinho8713]

@@pinakmiku4999 families can get the cx-9 though

[@pinakmiku4999]

@@sidonronaldinho8713 What’s the point if it’s extra cost!? Families can even get a limousine too! At the comparison price point CX-9 doesn’t fit

[@quagmirewarrior4202]

@@pinakmiku4999 Maybe, the adult children should get their own cars if it's too cramp in the backseat. The room is just fine for a family with 3 young children.

[@TheMichaelRN]

Tucson hybrid is the one to get.

[@bonceyhutchinson315]

Just ordered the tucson plug in hybrid premium carnt wait

[@markstlcard]

I so agree but Hyundai is charging a $2000 - 4000 marketing fee. :(

[@mtnx7]

@@markstlcard do you mean dealers are charging markup?

[@jonathanxdoe]

Where do you live?

[@Kevzaz]

Just got one this week. Love it so far.

[@ELP1125]

They act like you need 500HP to merge on the highway. If a small little Corolla can merge no problem, I’m sure these SUVs won’t have a problem.

[@mncedisingcobo4]

Right! Like these vehicles aren’t sluggish at all, you put your foot down and they pick up speed decently.

[@maisondav1d]

Swear every car reviewer want performance and handling from every car they review instead of reviewing them for what their purpose are and if they meet those demands well or not.

[@raidersamson3356]

I was shopping for a compact suv for my growing family last September. I shopped CRV, RAV4 and the Forester. The two most important criteria for me was space for two car seats and an adult in the back and fuel economy. This eliminated the Mazda and Hyundai. RAV4 was very tight in the back with no leg room. It came down to the CRV and the forester, we chose the forester for the all wheel drive and the fantastic iSight system.

[@Offshore1977]

We average 32mpg in our 2wd CRV. We love it and love the way the rear door swing open 90 degrees

[@darthvirgin7157]

the CR-V may be due for a new generation update. BUT after 4 years, most of the quirks and issues have been ironed out from its first year rollout, that it should be hitting its stride right about now and so is a perfect buy. considering the current CR-V was rated at top 1-3 in most lists when it first came out, that’s not too bad.

[@hondacr-vtouringguy8327]

It really does. I love the car, and the way it looks right now, but I think it really needs an update

[@aadi8568]

The Tucson looks are growing on me now. I would probably go for the CX5 or the tucson

[@ajayphilipsabu]

Tucson looks great and probably have more tech, but it is slow, seats are bad and has a glossy center console. CX 5 definitely beats it in everything other than cargo space.

[@Fifthcell]

The Tuscon is very nice and has great tech, but it is SLOWWWW. High 9 second 0-60 time is ridiculous. The CX-5 is just better in almost every way

[@aadi8568]

honestly I would just get a decent estate car like mazda6 or skoda superb instead

[@aaronmeacham1679]

What about the Subaru Forester? I thought it was one of the best selling crossovers.

[@23sam42]

Having tested driven a bunch of models, I can't be happier with the Forester (sport trim). Especially for snow.

[@glennperrego5955]

Mainly because these car come in FWD OR AWD. And seeing as subaru has switched to mostly Symmetrical AWD cars, the forester would embarrass the competition. Seeing as it gets better fuel economy in AWD than some of these cars in their FWD layout. It doesn't need a turbo so it's fuel economy doesn't suck. I own a 2015 Forester limited and it does better on fuel economy than listed on car reviews.

[@klipschs]

What no forester here? Inconclusive result when there is a top seller in the market

[@aaronmeacham1679]

@@23sam42 me and my family enjoy our 2019 forester sport. It did really well when we had ice and snow last winter.

[@Phrancis5]

I don't see the Escape in here either, but they probably just went with the most popular by sales volume. My Dad has a new Forester and it's nice, but outside of certain regions where AWD is more popular, it just isn't a big seller and it's just slow now that the XT is gone.

[@middler5212]

Making the hybrid a better option is not a downside. It’s how it should be.

[@swanblake]

Wow, the commenters here seem to be offended no matter what you pick. I appreciate the honesty in this comparison and agree with the rankings. I think this class of suvs is very flawed. The Tuscan is the modest disappointing to me as it is the newest vehicle and the so west regardless of power trains. Then there is its touch capacitive center stack which is infuriating to use. They took all that time to come put with a bottom of the pack vehicle. The CX5 is my favorite because I like to drive, but do wish it had a touchscreen and an eight speed automatic.

[@moonsapling]

Owning this car for 2 weeks now, I got used to the touch screen climate controls on the 2nd day of ownership. Its really not as bad as the internet makes it to be. I fact I find it completely normal to operate.

[@IReapZz95]

I have the mazda cx-5 signature and its definitely the best car. The rav 4 plug in hybrid is good too but it still gives you a toyota interior which sucks for lack of better word compared to mazdas. Mazda needs to make their infotainment screen a touchscreen though, its annoying not having it but not a deal breaker

[@NatureQuest2024]

Just rented cx-30 for a week, still have it, will return it in couple days. I’m seriously thinking of getting the CX-5 one. It drives nice and very nimble. I don’t care about touch screen. My problem with CX-30 so far is the sun visor as it doesn’t work for sideways and electronics seems glitchy (maybe only this car since it’s a rental) oh also the cx-30 ac vents locations are not proper, they push air towards the steering wheel so my hands froze up while my body was overheating lol, hopefully these issues are solved with cx-5 model

[@IReapZz95]

@@NatureQuest2024 CX-5 is really nice, specially with the turbo engine. While the vent issue is improved from the CX-30 it can still freeze your hands a bit

[@tigersjk2558]

It has an ugly back unfortunately.

[@nj-1008]

Touchscreens are dangerous. Having to hit just the right spot while trying to keep an eye on the road makes zero sense. The dial is the way to go. Just sit back and glance over. It's amazing. Don't knock it until you've tried it. Btw, I was able to rent a Hyundai with the touch screen a while back. At the end of 2 weeks with the car, I was ready to pull my hair out.

[@IReapZz95]

@@nj-1008 I agree with you while you are driving but if you are stationary the touchscreen is just faster. I wouldn't want them to remove the dial, just to do both things like most other brands do, so consumers can chose either

[@cfb1923]

I bought a new 2021 CX-5 Touring AWD (not turbo). Most of the time I can get at least 30 MPG combined. Maybe because it's mostly flat. The Touring is on the less expensive end of CX-5's, yet everyone comments about how plush and sturdy it is. The cargo hold is smaller than most compact SUV's, but it's serviceable. No one vehicle can be the best in every metric. The CX-5 IS fun to drive. LOVE the 6-speed. Zoom zoom...

[@winstontsang7977]

I just finished my 20 days, 7000 miles trip around the USA with my 2020 Honda CRV, overall MPG of about 38, the last day from Wilson NC back to NJ all highway at speed around 60, I got 46 mpg, impressive.

[@joed3264]

Left out two of my favorites - Subaru Forester. Consumer Reports ranks it as number 1 in the Compact SUV class. Mid-sized SUV number 1 - Subaru Outback.

[@23sam42]

0-60... That's the main reason why people down vote the Forester. Actually bought the 2021 model and it's superb (especially for bad pavement and snow).

[@scotchbudmeister9018]

I bought a CX-5 with the turbo. Love that it has no CVT, no cylinder deactivation (turbo models) and accelerates and handles like a luxury sport sedan - lol. For me, it still has enough cargo space even though it has the least cubic feet of the bunch. It really is a drivers car. Best stretch of highway mileage so far is 31.3 mph keeping the turbo out of it - but that's no fun 👌

[@kevinnorwood7355]

Sadly most of these cars are not used as intended, most carry two people at most. I'd personally take the Mazda it drive beautifully and looks like it costs more then it does.

[@brandon6541]

Agreed makes me cringe when i see a huge suv with like 1 or 2 people like bruh

[@rebelcobra5099]

Lol I just Mazda CX-5, and it's usually just me.. I had a Corolla before. I wanted to be higher plus something works better in the snow

[@kencoleman8929]

Live simply, look good, travel lightly, Mazda CX5 for me! (Took me mum to lunch today too!) 🌞👍👍

[@moonsapling]

Owning a Tucson here, european version with the 1.6TGDI and 7DCT. This thing handles great and can surely kick some dirt too. Loving it!

[@louislopez55]

I think these types of vehicles have been out long enough for their 5 year resale value to be compared, or at least mentioned. They could also tell us some of the common problems about them (ex: Honda oil consumption issue, Mazda direct injection engine maintenance requirements, Nissan CVT problems and history) but I guess if they did the manufacturers would no longer loan them new vehicles to test. I recommend potential owners do some research so you become informed about any potential issues before you get that $35,000 loan.

[@chester4311]

My wife has owned 3 CRV’s, put about 55k to 60k on each one, I have never heard of, or experienced the “oil dilution” issue that is spoken about on these threads. Only went back to the dealer once for some minor recall issue. Trade in value is stupendous. Wife now drives a 2018 Pilot, not too impressed, may return to a CRV or go to an RDX.

[@garrettw99]

Mazda CX-5 isn’t the only one with direct injection. Literally all of these have direct injection. Toyota also has port injection that cleans the injectors.

[@XXXXBossXXXX]

thank you for this info

[@rickitynick4463]

Just fyi, Nissan seems to have figured out their CVT issues. They have re-engineered it, and the maintenance complaints since 2017 have all but vanished.

[@troecurov3]

Hi Lois, could you recommend one of those kinds, one car , which is reliable and nice? Could you help me please?

[@HeortirtheWoodwarden]

Putting the Forester and Sportage there would complete the Asian SUV pantheon

[@kristivaughan3839]

NO mention about stereo sound. Love driving with loud music playing.

[@handmeadozenbeers8655]

All base models will sound the same

[@andokewl]

Well CX 5 comes with Bose. I enjoy driving in my CX5 2019 with loud music very much.

[@CactusJack252]

The only one I would buy out of these is the carbon edition turbo cx-5.

[@afrodragon4187]

I read that alot in comments but the sales numbers don't reflect that.

[@cgnefarious5785]

@@afrodragon4187 The carbon edition targets a very specific segment of drivers, and does so very well. Unfortunately I think you are correct and it's just not selling as much as they were hoping, since it doesn't seem to be coming back in 2022.

[@nj-1008]

@@cgnefarious5785 Collector car in a few years. People don't know what they don't know. Probably put off by the smaller cargo space. I love the car for all the other reasons, mainly looks. Not boxy, Not clunky and the interior is beautiful.

[@bigpoppa1992]

I'll take the Mazda cx5. I think it looks the best and that 2.5 turbo engine.🖤🖤🖤

[@normt430]

Motor Trend magazine figure eight test measure not only grip but accleration, braking power, along with shock dampening, sway bars, spring rates. It's the recipe that has the 2018 GMC Terrain/Equinox one full second ahead of the 2018 CX-5 in that test. You see, the Japanese cook the books in making a lightweight, small, and great handling cuv that journalist rave about and get fuel economy as a result. When the buying public review the Mazda it is loud and rough riding and a turn off with just a ride around the block. So 2018 Mazda adds to the CX-5 missing sound deadening and adds heavier acoustic glass. Now the suspension is taxed with sway bar and spring rates from the previous updates along with shocks that need revalving. Braking performance has suffered with the extra weight with longer stopping from 60 than a 2018 Terrain by over 10 feet. And if you want to compare real world economy, fuelly.com-which are owners reporting, has the new 2018 Equinox 1.5T besting the CX-5. Sorry to burst your Japanese bubble but most everyone is on the same playing field today and many have passed them up and especially on the cost to buy front thanks to dealerahips advertising on places like cars.com. It is public perception that lags because of you and the journalist want to protect their internet clicks and keep inflated resdiuals as the prices are higher to buy than non-Japanese, negating any excellent resdiuals value. The auto auctions thank you guys. This is especially the case for the Honda CR-V. Regarding pricing and value the 2018 Terrain and CX-5 are dead even today and 3 year, 36,000 miles from now. The Subaru is $2,000 less today and $2,000 less in the same time period. This all based on info gathered from cars.com. It favors the Terrain if I used 2017 values as it is an out going model and the best deal here. Though the base 2018 Terrain doesn't have dual zone climate control it does have rear seat upper vents. The Mazda does not until you go up to the Touring model. The Terrain SLE has dual zone and the CX-5 Touring has rear seat vents starting the last two years or so. Both cars are the same price on cars.com Early Mazda models do not have rear seat venting. The 2018 Honda CR-V is the most expensive at $6,000 more than comparable 2018 Equinox. The Honda still offers the old 2.4l and is $5,000 more than a 2017 Equinox 2.4l. It is just over priced at all levels. And at 3 years, 36,000 miles later the CR-V cost less than a Equinox. Which means the more expensive, new Honda has dropped more in value than the Equinox. The Terrain 1.5T receives the 9-speed transmission and has not been tested. Only the Equinox 1.5t 6-speed has been timed..

[@cgnefarious5785]

@@normt430 You selling a used Equinox or something?

[@normt430]

@@cgnefarious5785 "During our testing, the front-drive (Equinox 1.6t diesel)model was put through Real MPG's evaluations, and the results were an impressive 33.1/46.7 mpg, making this oil-burning family car one of the most fuel-efficient crossovers we've tested." Motor Trend

[@nj-1008]

@@normt430 Dude! It's 2021!

[@barbonez2976]

@@normt430 why do you care which country a car comes from? it is completely irrelevant!!

[@gagandeepgill7930]

I’m looking to upgrade to an SUV after driving a civic for 5 years now. Really confused between New Rogue and New Tucson. They both look really good and have so much technology to offer.

[@rammanohar8161]

So Honda paid the highest amount.

[@xboxonexchannal3713]

I owned nearly all of these cars and by far the best is the Mazda CX-5 for family and pleasure

[@bobobobobobo4597]

Went with CX-5 because it wasn’t CVT and had the best incentives from manufacturer.

[@ELP1125]

CX-5 is a joy to drive!

[@Mrtellitlikeitis]

What incentives?

[@bobobobobobo4597]

@@Mrtellitlikeitis when i bought it in july, $750 loyalty. 0.9% apr for 5 year loan. $1000 additional cash on trade-in.

[@ethannaka1822]

@@bobobobobobo4597 how you liking the car. I’m looking at the carbon edition

[@bobobobobobo4597]

@@ethannaka1822 cabin in ultra quiet, drives extremely well. Entire thing feels more premium than what I paid for.

[@trevorc5477]

I'm loving my 2021 rav4 xse hybrid. Quick, extremely efficient (38+ mpg consistently) and good looking.

[@handmeadozenbeers8655]

Everyone sleeping on Mazda, they've been leaving other Japanese manufacturers in the dust since they bought the company back from Ford.

[@kromahj]

How they leaving them in the dust, madza don't even sell more then the Nissan rogue, talking about Toyota and Honda

[@reuben7]

@@kromahj it's not just about sales, the feel of the car should matter, and Mazda just makes cars that feel and drive better.

[@handmeadozenbeers8655]

@@kromahj Sales don't even give a good picture, the Equinox beats the Rogue In sales, are you gonna tell me the Equinox is better than the Rogue?

[@kromahj]

@@handmeadozenbeers8655 not saying it better

[@kromahj]

@@handmeadozenbeers8655 madza also don't have luxury division like other brand, that why their cars always look good

[@frumpd63]

As someone who just finished test driving all of these, the Tuscon Hybrid is the winner, and it's not even close. The CR-V and Rav are long overdue for a refresh and are vastly uncompetitive with the space, tech, and value of the Tuscon and Rogue. CX5 is super nice but is small for the money and the engine you want is thirsty.

[@theyadmire511]

A new CR-V is coming next year. It have been spotted testing.

[@wcrash9361]

Agree rav and crv are dated and even new crv would still be too pricey for most. Tucson is so cheaply finished when it comes to interior and seating . So much hard cheap plastic . Looks great in pics but not in reality

[@rebelcobra5099]

@@wcrash9361 the Mazda has the nicest finishes. I think it's best car, if cargo space isn't an issue.

[@mpampismaniatis7634]

@@wcrash9361 I already own tucson is comfortable enough interior is not cheap and everything is placed steadily and carefully you can't see a flaw at all also the leather of new tucson considered one of the best in quality do your research and leave jealousy behind.

[@billyrock8305]

RAV4 the easy winner here. No wonder it’s the best selling small SUV in North America. Buyer’s ❤️ it!

[@hollowpointbullet1677]

Just got my 2022 HONDA CR-V TOURING HYBRID with the 2.0L. let me tell you it drives smooth, comfortable, best looking and I know from owning Hondas they are long lasting and reliable. For me I know I went with my winner. All I can say is do some homework 📚 before you go to the dealer. It’s nice to know the pros and cons on the car you have your eye on and not just the looks.

[@jp93309]

We’re CR-V loyalists with a 2010 and 2015. We started years ago with a much-loved and trouble-free 2001. This time we’re cross-shopping against new plug-in hybrid offerings from Kia (Sportage and Sorento) because Honda is lazy with updating that ancient and slow infotainment system. Maybe Honda will step it up and update it and get a plug-in to boot.

[@CyanChrys]

If the new civic infotainment are to go by, I think they will.

[@RaY_77W]

You have to remember the crv is gonna be going to be redesigned soon

[@jp93309]

@@RaY_77W That would be nice if Honda did. There’s a reason the CR-V continues to top many of the small SUV review lists year after year despite the continued bad rap that the antiquated infotainment system gets.

[@VB-3]

I test drove almost all of the cars featured here and it wasn’t even close. The CX5 obliterates the competition. The only thing that comes close is something by Audi or BMW. Specifically I purchased the 2022 CX5 Signature. The Turbo was irresistible.

[@ontarioman6301]

Cx 5. The power, the driving experience, reliability. Nephew has 300000 km. Regular maintenance. The turbo takes it the next level. I use to like Honda but they have become like every other manufacturers. BORING. ALSO CVT is a huge turn off. 7000 to replace. Good luck .

[@normt430]

Motor Trend magazine figure eight test measure not only grip but accleration, braking power, along with shock dampening, sway bars, spring rates. It's the recipe that has the 2018 GMC Terrain/Equinox one full second ahead of the 2018 CX-5 in that test. You see, the Japanese cook the books in making a lightweight, small, and great handling cuv that journalist rave about and get fuel economy as a result. When the buying public review the Mazda it is loud and rough riding and a turn off with just a ride around the block. So 2018 Mazda adds to the CX-5 missing sound deadening and adds heavier acoustic glass. Now the suspension is taxed with sway bar and spring rates from the previous updates along with shocks that need revalving. Braking performance has suffered with the extra weight with longer stopping from 60 than a 2018 Terrain by over 10 feet. And if you want to compare real world economy, fuelly.com-which are owners reporting, has the new 2018 Equinox 1.5T besting the CX-5. Sorry to burst your Japanese bubble but most everyone is on the same playing field today and many have passed them up and especially on the cost to buy front thanks to dealerahips advertising on places like cars.com. It is public perception that lags because of you and the journalist want to protect their internet clicks and keep inflated resdiuals as the prices are higher to buy than non-Japanese, negating any excellent resdiuals value. The auto auctions thank you guys. This is especially the case for the Honda CR-V. Regarding pricing and value the 2018 Terrain and CX-5 are dead even today and 3 year, 36,000 miles from now. The Subaru is $2,000 less today and $2,000 less in the same time period. This all based on info gathered from cars.com. It favors the Terrain if I used 2017 values as it is an out going model and the best deal here. Though the base 2018 Terrain doesn't have dual zone climate control it does have rear seat upper vents. The Mazda does not until you go up to the Touring model. The Terrain SLE has dual zone and the CX-5 Touring has rear seat vents starting the last two years or so. Both cars are the same price on cars.com Early Mazda models do not have rear seat venting. The 2018 Honda CR-V is the most expensive at $6,000 more than comparable 2018 Equinox. The Honda still offers the old 2.4l and is $5,000 more than a 2017 Equinox 2.4l. It is just over priced at all levels. And at 3 years, 36,000 miles later the CR-V cost less than a Equinox. Which means the more expensive, new Honda has dropped more in value than the Equinox. The Terrain 1.5T receives the 9-speed transmission and has not been tested. Only the Equinox 1.5t 6-speed has been timed. .

[@LohansTube]

How they handled oil dilution issues with the 2017 and 2018 models is still a major concern.

[@shrnz33]

@@normt430 :: Which one you'd recommend ?

[@normt430]

@@shrnz33 the least expensive, most efficient, and best handling. I like the turbo-4 for tuning and close to 40 mpg.

[@shrnz33]

@@normt430 sorry... Did not get it... Mind sharing full name?

[@princegorman2979]

My choice is the CR-V. Really my favorite

[@kisslevi15]

Among these CX5 anytime for sure

[@HeadlessChickenTO]

A recent shopper here. We test drove the Subaru Forester Touring, Jeep Cherokee Trailhawk, and Mazda CX-5. Forester was nice and roomy, ok on driving dynamics, great windows for minimal blind spots. I hate how busy it is between the dash and center console, there is way too much going on. Also wasn't a fan of their infotainment interface. The Cherokee felt good, I come from a Compass and Wrangler so it all felt familiar. A bit cramped inside though, especially with a pano sunroof. Biggest downer was price as she was the more expensive of the bunch. CX-5 GT, driving her felt good. Infotainment system will take some getting use to, but my previous cars never had them. Spacious enough for my family. Love the quality interior feel. Doesn't break the bank too badly. And this is what we ordered.

[@CarazyDiamond]

Not sure why you guys missed out Ford Escape from this competition? Not sure why after announcing all the shortfalls of CR-V in most categories yet still a winner?

[@joemama1226]

Honestly hondas are better

[@DDDDD760]

RAV 4 is the best seller for a reason.

[@kristians2704]

@@DDDDD760 the only reason why toyotas sell so well is because of their reputation, not because they are actually better

[@YellowBoltTC]

Tuscan is the best

[@joemama1226]

@@YellowBoltTC I’m starting to like Hyundai’s but Mazda and Honda are the best

[@Shadownian]

Id still take the Rav4. Not just because I own one either. To me it has the best looks. Its the best all around..room..tech...performance...etc. Add to that the fact that the Rav4 will outlast every one of these by years and have a much lower cost of ownership and better resale value....id definitely stick with the Rav. Theres a reason its by far the best seller.

[@Monk7uvi]

Rav4 -strong, popular & simple. Tucson - tried new design (only hybrid fine) Rogue - average changes Cx5 - power CRV - is the BEST !! Best in interior, Exterior, safety & drive. Smooth riding & handling. Simply the best just lag in power.

[@sheldonallen3299]

I don't agree with you about the CR-V

[@gerardoesquivel9919]

I just have one question Which is the best for bad pavement? Which would be quieter, and most comfortable around potholes and bad roads?

[@Flash363]

I'm gonna say CX-5 just from previous experience

[@ro0ster648]

Outback or the the new Outlander. The CX-5 and CRV both have firmer suspensions that help with handling, but doesn't absorb bumps that well. The RAV4 and Forester are somewhere in the middle. Don't know about the American brands or the new Tucson and the still yet to be released in the USA Kia Sportage.

[@gerardoesquivel9919]

@@Flash363 thanks

[@gerardoesquivel9919]

@@ro0ster648 rav4 sounds good

[@arapaimagold8088]

Nissan Rouge.

[@Cali_12024]

Mazda cx5 is the best looking!!

[@xboxonexchannal3713]

You got good taste in cars cars my friend

[@WeAreNotSheep2023]

CX5 is the best small SUV in this group in my humble opinion.

[@tonysaluta9142]

CX-5 is what I’d go for 👌

[@upperechelon25]

Just switched from a 2019 Hyundai Santa Fe 2.0 T ultimate to a 2022 Toyota rav-4 XLE premium. Tbh I’m happy with the Toyota, better gas mpg and the car is just, simple. Since I had a lot of positive equity when I traded in my Hyundai, I may trade in when the redesigned Crv comes out. If it’s good

[@eduqloo]

I hate when motoring journalists talk about "slow acceleration" and "vague handling" like they're talking about a sports car, like, calm down Adam its a nissan rogue with a 4 cylinder

[@acuras4ever]

Yes but driving dynamics aren’t just about fun, the car feels poised and more expensive when it’s settled around corners and on highway speeds... I can never be in a car that is wollowy and not settled..

[@eduqloo]

@@acuras4ever of course, but they're clearly focused on the sportiness and speed of the car, it's no one's priority other than the journalist's

[@superman28607]

Proud crv owner here but I’m not really understanding why is rav4 lower than Tucson. Touch sensitive control is not good IMO, it can be outright dangerous. And sluggish response makes it seems it should be lower. At least for me

[@kristians2704]

more dated, probably worse to drive. The only good thing about the RAV4 is reliability

[@gmfitzg]

Out of all I LOVE the CX5 the best. But, unfortunately for me I need the most space possible on the inside. So it's CRV or Rav4 for me

[@Phrancis5]

An honest statement. Lot's of reviewers and commenters love the CX5's looks and driving dynamics, but the whole point of a crossover is practicality, which is why Honda and Toyota dominate this segment.

[@tarunreddy335]

@@Phrancis5 that really depends on how you look at cross overs. Some just enjoy the seating height and the dynamics. It is far and away the most fun to drive and definitely car good enough for a couple or a young family. That 250turbo with premium fuel is chef's kiss. Its the best looking exterior and interior has the best driving dynamics of the lot.

[@burgos227]

Toyota Rav4 is KING in this segment. Everything about the Rav4 .. functional

[@Soh90]

Haven’t watched it yet. Let me guess… 1st Tucson. 2nd Rogue. 3rd CX-5. 4th CR-V. 5th RAV4… They’re gonna say RAV4 is harsh. CR-V is great but old. CX-5 is the smallest and least efficient but it drives so good that we can’t rank it last. Rogue feels like a luxury product. And Tucson is packed with technology. Personally, I’d take a RAV4 Hybrid over all these cars.

[@nj-1008]

Wrong

[@palomma612]

I had a 2016 EX AWD CRV which I loved and decided to renew the lease with Honda. Now I have a 2019 EX AWD and what a disappointment. I am not an expert but for me the 2019 feels too heavy for the hp and the engine is noisy. But the worst part is when temperatures drops the car suddenly dies over night or while parked at work. the 1st time, Honda put a new battery (basically exchanged a new battery for another new battery) but I keep having the same problem still. Honda kept the car for a week and no one found the problem. 2 1/2 yrs with the car only 13k miles and can't wait for the lease to end.

[@darylltubebg]

I just Got the upgrade of my Honda CVR 2017 to the Loaded exl 2021. I've driven a CX5 but CRV handling is also at par with Mazda. Yet practicality to size and fuel efficiency maters a lot too. So even if Mazda feels sporty in driving, day to day use and fuel economy weights better. Sporty mode in Honda is great to win-win

[@nj-1008]

I get 35mpg on the highway with my CX-5.

[@lash9400]

It’s the Tucson which catches my eye it looks great if it was trading in my Outback it would be either the Tucson hybrid or RAV4 hybrid.

[@philippassport279]

Love the cx5

[@st_1998]

Rogue definately wins for me!

[@RobertBeedle]

The rogue is not a good choice mechanically. Poor 3 cylinder engine and worse made in Mexico Jatco transmission. If you’re keeping it only a couple years you won’t have to worry about it breaking.

[@Trackstar491]

A great deal of this review mentioned driving dynamics etc. Last time I checked driving dynamics are the reason why we go looking for compact SUV’s lol 😂

[@lowlanz]

Well Tucson has less acceleration and lower mpg because it's quite larger. So i don't think that's a downside. It's just physics.

[@Fifthcell]

Yes, but you’d think Hyundai would make up for it with more power

[@shermanbland5417]

No forester?

[@middler5212]

And why no forester?

[@georgepantoja8576]

I own a CX5 Carbon Turbo AWD. It's my daily driver and I put about a 50 miles a day. My average is 18mpg and that's not flooring it. Fun to drive? Yes. Poor fuel economy? Yes.

[@missjanelove]

I’m getting about 22mpg to 27 mph and it’s in town. You’re having too much fun!

[@nj-1008]

That's why I didn't go with the Turbo. I found it to be unnecessary after test driving both engines. I get 28 combined, 35 on long highway drives.

[@danielapreku3101]

The new Mazda cx 5 is also coming

[@khuludalismail2856]

When ??

[@cgnefarious5785]

@@khuludalismail2856 The 2022 models should come out in April is my guess. The full redesign won't be until 2023 though.

[@bigess]

Cx 50

[@kyron2092]

The new sportage isn't here yet, but based on what I've seen, it would be my choice

[@ThirdBrainLives]

You're the only one on earth!

[@stockey]

@@ThirdBrainLives He's not, i love the new Sportage.

[@stockey]

Great looking SUV.

[@wcrash9361]

New sportage is ok and beats a couple here but it’s so hard to not look at the haval h6 . I’ve been comparing most of the cars here and they just can’t compare to the tech styling and comfort of the h6 strangely enough . Also nothing comes close in price either

[@xboxonexchannal3713]

Sorry my friend but you got bad taste in cars

[@rickitynick4463]

I can definitely confirm that the new 1.5 turbo in the Rogue is anything but sluggish.

[@Tinrs80]

Wow the Rogue is #3 Good job Nissan.

[@giancarlogarcia404]

What about the Subaru Forester?

[@franklinsahagun6584]

any thing use CVT transmission a bit slower ,,but it really depends evryones preferences

[@isellorganic]

what is the new version of the crv? Are you talking about 2022?

[@amanti113]

I will pick the Tucson

[@sammyjammy6647]

The Tucson is ugly in my opinion. I choose the rav4 for its rugged handsome looks

[@nj-1008]

@@sammyjammy6647 I lusted for the Tucson for almost a year before it was finally available. And then I saw it. And then the dealer marked it up $10,000! I am not kidding. I walked out and bought the CX-5 Carbon and haven't looked back.

[@tutigseg]

The Tucson looks the best imo especially the N-Line

[@mr308death]

Do a test at 200k miles. I think the Toyota Rav4 will win this because none of the others can go that far. Rav4 all day every day.

[@kristians2704]

most people that buy/lease new cars don’t keep them for that long

[@sammyjammy6647]

@@kristians2704 yes but that’s not the point. If you keep it let’s say 100k or less you have better resale to a private party or trade in situation. Everyone trusts toyotas. You’ll have an easier time selling yours than buying a turboed car from Hyundai with a 100k

[@bluesy1234]

Hard to believe that a comparison of these cars doesn't mention the Tucson's useless tire repair kit. (Had to find out about this elsewhere), or the frightening CVT on the Roque. You'd think class action suits about these transmissions would deserve some mention.

[@RobertBeedle]

Lots of cars have the repair kits. I recommend a Mazda CX-5 with a real tire 🛞

[@23sam42]

Not sure why 0-60 is the gold standard somehow for a Small SUV... 🤦‍♂️ Outside of 0-60, the Forester wins (have test driven a bunch). Rav-4 ... Google Moose Test and you'll know everything you need to. Tucson - has a cheap interior feel CX-5 - while nice, was over priced for all usually standard options CR-V ... Just old feeling. Forester (Sport), off the line thanks to the AWD actually works fine, only highway passing is weak. Ok the other hand, Rain and specially SNOW driving is simply Amazing! Go test drive before you buy ✌️

[@bryantaulbee9709]

I can’t wait for them to review a Kia “Sport- TAJ”!!!! Just hearing him say that 30 times will have me rolling on the floor…. Sport-TAJ!!!!

[@RVAMTB]

I like my CR-V. I can fit 2 mountain bikes, with the front wheels off, in the back. I've done this multiple times for trips and it's nice. One thing I don't like is the estimated range available on a tank of gas. It's been steadily growing since I bought the car and is now almost at a laughable 500 mi per tank. I never get above 400 for a tank so I don't know where that other hundred is coming from. The infotainment system could use an update as well. Mine is the 2018 the 2021 version is much better and I wish it would update to that version. The integration with Android Auto is often questionable. I would prefer more seamless integration.

[@docsanti8971]

The whole approach of the analysis is wrong. When you buy a compact SUV your priorities are comfort, practicality, fuel economy and driving dynamics. If driving dynamics is what you want by a hatchback or a sedan.

[@wtutt6810]

Where is the Subaru Forester, Consumer Reports top pick?

[@rebelcobra5099]

They ranked it 5. It's not as popular as the others

[@kencoleman8929]

Looking forward to a comparison witth the new Pathfinder as well as the new Jeep Grand Cherokee L. Both 3 rows, but are they in the same class?

[@afrodragon4187]

That Jeep is expensive luxury brand prices. Heavy pass for me rather get a GV80 or an aviator.

[@stockey]

The Tuscon 1.6T is not slow.

[@eleanormassaro5195]

We don’t get the 1.6 turbo Tuscon in the US anymore, except in the hybrid model

[@cemalettinaydin997]

Which one is the most quite in all (engine, tires, road, wind)?

[@quagmirewarrior4202]

I have a 2021 CX-5 and it's very quiet. It's great listening to music without outside noise ruining the moment.

[@1daful]

The Rogue is very quiet.. It's pleasant all around.

[@ostadfiha4225]

my choices are CR-V and Tucson

[@lancemayabi3887]

No Subaru Forester?

[@brenrob7403]

The Commando phone case is simply the best phone case I have ever seen!!!!!

[@jhrodriguez08]

So the Forester is not invited 😏 , or is it a SUV (not that small)

[@deman19901]

I see that didn't watch the video

[@edmundscars]

We currently rank the Forester #5 among small SUVs. Check out www.edmunds.com/suv to see the rankings.

[@jhrodriguez08]

@@edmundscars Number 5 with the best true AWD system, more comfortable for passengers than RAV4 , more agile also than the competitors due engine low center of gravity. I’ve had a 2003, 2011, 2013, 2018 and now a 2021 forester, and the only “weak” point for the last two generations is the CVT (not my cup of tea). But after driving (because of work) RAV4, Highlander , Tucson rentals, the Forester just simply feels like a better engineered vehicle than the rest of the pack.

[@jeffstone28]

@@edmundscars Consumer Reports ranks the Forester first. Huge difference of opinion here. I would love to know why, as I'm in the market for one of these small SUVs.

[@aaronmeacham1679]

If you rank it number five, shouldn’t it be the fifth suv up there?

[@nj-1008]

Everyone commenting on Mazda having the lower sales, if people actually considered Mazda from the outset, more would likely choose it. I never considered Mazda when I shopped for a new car a few months back. I was set on the Tucson. But for some reason, the Carbon caught my eye and that was that. I believe this might be a common occurrence that Mazda isn't considered because they're more thought of in the sport/sedan category. I don't think many people even think of them regarding SUVs.

[@WesLey-yv8vi]

Just bought the CR-V without even driving it first...that's how good it is.

[@justinjoseph6966]

Just bought a ‘21 CR-V EX-L and I absolutely love it! The rest of these vehicles are all great, but when it comes to engines, NOBODY makes better engines than Honda! I loved the redesign of the Tucson and think it’s awesome. My sister has one and it’s great. The biggest thing that was a turnoff for me when when I was in the market for a new vehicle was the turn signals/hazards being on the bumper. I don’t know why Hyundai/KIA has gotten into doing that, but I think it’s a horrible idea and a safety hazard.

[@jimbriggs2638]

No Forest of Subaru?

[@jethrelim7016]

Rogue all the way 👏