Biblically-Accurate Angels Explained

  Рет қаралды 411,821

ReligionForBreakfast

ReligionForBreakfast

Жыл бұрын

Join my online class about ancient magic and guardian angels!: religionforbreakfast.eventbri...
Join our Patreon community!: / religionforbreakfast
One-time donations here!: www.paypal.me/religionforbrea...
Check out my favorite religious studies books by following this affiliate link to my Amazon page: www.amazon.com/shop/religionf...
Biblically-accurate Clippy was used with permission from the original artist. Check out the work by Evangeline Gallagher on Twitter: @egallagher_art
Angel animations by ‪@ECHenry‬
You may have seen the memes about "biblically-accurate angels." These memes often emphasize the weird, visionary creatures mentioned in the Hebrew Bible. Technically, though, 'biblically-accurate' angels also just look like humans.

Пікірлер: 1 500
@ReligionForBreakfast
@ReligionForBreakfast Жыл бұрын
Join my online class about guardian angel magic!: religionforbreakfast.eventbrite.com/
@nicanornunez9787
@nicanornunez9787 Жыл бұрын
Why did the On the celestial hierarchy omitted the Ophanim? Btw great love your work.
@ready1fire1aim1
@ready1fire1aim1 Жыл бұрын
On Bible Gateway if you search for RUACH ELOHIM and RUACH YAHWEH you can see the difference between Spirit of God and Spirit of Satan.
@jameswright...
@jameswright... Жыл бұрын
@@ready1fire1aim1 Difference? In the bible god kills more people than the devil and the devil only kills with gods permission so god can win a bet. Both are very similar in the fact they are both myths.
@jimmywim
@jimmywim Жыл бұрын
I'm there.
@sdc319
@sdc319 Жыл бұрын
See you then!
@tuvia4082
@tuvia4082 Жыл бұрын
Gabriel said do not be afraid because he was just some dude showing up telling an unmarried virgin woman that she was going to get pregnant.
@stillnoided8280
@stillnoided8280 Жыл бұрын
Same type of thing in Luke, where John the Baptist's father Zechariah is alone in a dark room in the temple and suddenly there's another person. There are only two places in the bible where an angel says "don't be afraid" and means "don't be afraid of me". The other time is when the shepherds are watching their flocks at night time, and suddenly there's all this light around them and people coming down from Heaven to tell them of Jesus' birth.
@starmaker75
@starmaker75 Жыл бұрын
And also Gabriel angelic jumpscare Mary. If fact come to think it would scary for Mary that someone that just appear out of nowhere just said “hey your pregnant and that baby is going to be the messiah. He also going to died pretty brutally”
@C.Fecteau-AU-MJ13
@C.Fecteau-AU-MJ13 Жыл бұрын
If some dude shows up and says that to your daughter... You should tell her to probably be afraid. I keep a rottweiler in our house, just in case Gabriel goes getting any ideas.
@Amila5209
@Amila5209 Жыл бұрын
How do u know the exact reason?
@ckay_real2765
@ckay_real2765 Жыл бұрын
@@C.Fecteau-AU-MJ13 true, but gabriel wasn't just a dude
@Lis-ek9wm
@Lis-ek9wm Жыл бұрын
"I'm an expert in ancient magic. It's what I got my PhD in.". Instant subscribed. ✨
@elihinze3161
@elihinze3161 Жыл бұрын
Top contender for coolest PhD subject matter!
@SquigglesZero
@SquigglesZero Жыл бұрын
This also explains the glorious beard.
@xxxxneoxxxx
@xxxxneoxxxx Жыл бұрын
It's the closest you could ever get to being a wizard here in the Muggle world.
@jakeaurod
@jakeaurod Жыл бұрын
@@xxxxneoxxxx Then realize Arthur Weasley is his counterpart in the Wizarding World.
@Shadowonwater
@Shadowonwater Жыл бұрын
saying that makes him sound like a wizard, lol
@Lordlaneus
@Lordlaneus Жыл бұрын
No idea if this reflects the ideas of ancient authors, but to me, the wheels covered in eyes suggests a creature that is capable of looking at every side of something simultaneously, which feels like a decent metaphor for the perspective of an all knowing being
@LimeyLassen
@LimeyLassen Жыл бұрын
I'm reminded of beings in the Hindu faith with similar descriptions
@LmaoMoni
@LmaoMoni Жыл бұрын
Yeah pretty much
@christophecrist2171
@christophecrist2171 Жыл бұрын
Definitely reads a lot better as a metaphor. That was an interesting thing that you pointed out, it got me thinking. Keep up the good work.
@bookmoon7244
@bookmoon7244 Жыл бұрын
Eyes= glass balls/windows. Small alien ship/drone with technology more advanced than us. Ancient people were not stupid, they tried their best to describe what they saw with the vocabulary they had
@ne0nmancer
@ne0nmancer Жыл бұрын
@@bookmoon7244 Stupid
@Jamesssssssssssssss
@Jamesssssssssssssss Жыл бұрын
That clippy as an angel drawing is perfect. I love it so much
@gallanosa
@gallanosa Жыл бұрын
The only way to have made it better would have been with the choices, "I am afraid" and "I am very afraid." 🤣
@MicroStarlight
@MicroStarlight Жыл бұрын
It's so unexpected yet great, I totally forgot clippy existed
@yuki-sakurakawa
@yuki-sakurakawa Жыл бұрын
The clippynim is the highest order of office angel.
@IronX77
@IronX77 Жыл бұрын
Timestamp?
@kevinaguilar9454
@kevinaguilar9454 Жыл бұрын
That really tickled me 😂
@tysongames2750
@tysongames2750 Жыл бұрын
I see an Ophanim and think, "Wow, how complicated is God's imagination?", but then I think Jellyfish and I'm like "Ok."
@harrymon0
@harrymon0 Жыл бұрын
Care to elaborate?
@LimeyLassen
@LimeyLassen Жыл бұрын
A "wheel covered in rings of eyes" so a clam, yeah
@holothuroid9111
@holothuroid9111 Жыл бұрын
@@harrymon0 I don't know what the poster above is thinking, but the fact that the "jellyfish" is only one stage in their life cycle and the fertile form is sessile is beyond amazing.
@randyhelzerman
@randyhelzerman Жыл бұрын
Ophanim never really freaked me out. Its just when they started talking to me that I got real scared..
@chompythebeast
@chompythebeast Жыл бұрын
Neither the idea of jellyfish nor Semitic lesser deities seem all that had for humans to imagine, especially since that's where the latter actually came from
@UniDocs_Mahapushpa_Cyavana
@UniDocs_Mahapushpa_Cyavana Жыл бұрын
Angelic powers are basically always forgotten about. They can: - Shapeshift convincingly - Alter minds (like Gabriel removing a man's ability to speak) - Enter visions - Burn everything with their radiance as they are made of fire - Thus, they are also immune to fire.
@blksmagma
@blksmagma Жыл бұрын
There's this story in the Bible where God has a council with them and asks them who can come up with the best plan to tempt a king he didn't like and get him killed. One of them finally suggests that it will become a lying spirit in the mouth of a bunch of prophets. God says, "This will work. Go ahead". And the angel does exactly he says. So angels can also either posses a bunch of people at once or cause people to lie through spirit magic or something. Either way, they can become lying spirits in service of God.
@UniDocs_Mahapushpa_Cyavana
@UniDocs_Mahapushpa_Cyavana Жыл бұрын
​@@blksmagma Legion also possesses multiple beings at once. Though, technically it only says spirit, so it could be any spirit of any lifeform, from transformed human to fire serpent. Though a powerful one, at least compared to humans.
@onnimannimaki8846
@onnimannimaki8846 Жыл бұрын
@Ignis i wanna know too
@UniDocs_Mahapushpa_Cyavana
@UniDocs_Mahapushpa_Cyavana Жыл бұрын
@Ignis He is probably referring to the lying spirit story in 1 Kings and 2 Chronicles. Due to the spirit's race being ambiguious, it is often not said to be an angel. Thus, it would be hard to find by searching for lying angel.
@blksmagma
@blksmagma Жыл бұрын
@@UniDocs_Mahapushpa_Cyavana Yep! This is in 1st Kings 22:19-23. And it appears again in 2 Chronicles. The passage says God has a council with "all the host of heaven" . To interpret what the species of the host are, that'll depend on whether you believe: -other gods (lesser or not) exist -any spirits other than God are angels -there are spirits not elaborated on in the Bible that God will use in his army. Because a host = army in this context. I'm not sure the Jewish writers at the time would be comfortable with saying that there were other gods. True about Legion! But isn't Legion like a bunch of demonic spirits at once, like a hive mind? Referencing the fact that a Roman legion is like 5000+ soldiers?
@stephanieparker1250
@stephanieparker1250 Жыл бұрын
Something I’ve always loved about religious texts and stories are the fact that these stories are a reflection of the time periods hopes, dreams, fears and daily lives. You can see this brilliantly reflected in how biblical stories change based on the political environment of Middle East. Loving hopeful god, vs vengeful angry god, for example. It’s a window into the lives being lived in those times..
@LPVince94
@LPVince94 Жыл бұрын
The conflicting nature of the jewish father god probably stems from it originally being a warrior storm god that absorbed the pretty chill head of the caananite panteon El.
@thebobbrom7176
@thebobbrom7176 Жыл бұрын
2:40 I know the term originated in this kind of context but it is kind of funny seeing a biblical passage end "very awesome" It's hard not to think of Samson's mum as a stoner
@merseyviking
@merseyviking Жыл бұрын
... and he was like totally rad!
@shaolin1derpalm
@shaolin1derpalm Жыл бұрын
The book of Ted Theodore Logan
@giullianorb
@giullianorb Жыл бұрын
''and then I beseeched him: 'dude, I'm like, wtf bro'''
@a.howardsmith3243
@a.howardsmith3243 8 ай бұрын
Bad Version ....try KJVersion same text.
@thebobbrom7176
@thebobbrom7176 8 ай бұрын
@@_hs.edjw-._du The Bible verse isn't relevant And honestly I'm pretty sure God would be greatly offended you think they're so insecure that they'd take offence to that
@geoffreyrichards6079
@geoffreyrichards6079 Жыл бұрын
It is mentioned (I can’t recall if it was from the Bible or not) that Angels can assume human form. So it kinda makes sense as to why the most common depiction of them found in the old texts describes them as humanlike. But when they’re not in human guise, well… I guess that’s the real mystery.
@maxxor-overworldhero6730
@maxxor-overworldhero6730 Жыл бұрын
The most common belief is that (except for maybe the Archangels), the higher up you get in the hierarchy of Angels - as in the closer to God - the more they don't resemble easily recognizable things. Especially when specifically in Hebrew the most common usage of Angelic terms that were used for regular human interactions was _Malakim,_ and those were usually depicted as nearly all Angels are commonly depicted in pop culture today.
@benbittinger9789
@benbittinger9789 Жыл бұрын
"Do not forget to show hospitality to strangers, for by so doing some people have shown hospitality to angels without knowing it." Hebrews 13:2
@JamesJNothingIsTooSensitive
@JamesJNothingIsTooSensitive Жыл бұрын
​@@benbittinger9789 And this negates what the OP said how? Because it doesn't. At all.
@MrCmon113
@MrCmon113 11 ай бұрын
The texts don't say that they took some form though. And we have inhabitants of heaven lusting after human women and having offspring with them. Most plausibly angels and most other inhabitants of heaven were originally supposed to look just like humans.
@JamesJNothingIsTooSensitive
@JamesJNothingIsTooSensitive 11 ай бұрын
@@MrCmon113 That doesn't fit at all actually. 1. Considering that we have humans who lust after animals, one doesn't need to be the same "form" to lust after something. 2. Shapeshifters can lust after anything even moreso, because they can change to become anything. 3. We were made in God's image, not the image of Angels. 4. None of the other ranks of Angelic beings are the least bit humanlike in appearance. Why would the lowest rank be, when clearly God - the highest rank - is? 5. It makes FAR more sense for the Angels - the low rank "messengers" - to be able to shape-shifting so they can take messages to ANYONE in the cosmos. Other worlds, with alien life? Doesn't matter. Angels go where they need to and take whatever messages that they need to. 6. Taking anything taught by someone who teaches "Angelic Guardian Magic" as biblically accurate is laughable at best. Magic is forbidden by the Bible, and rather explicitly so. He very clearly cherrypicks and preys on people who don't read their bibles in full.
@mathieuleader8601
@mathieuleader8601 Жыл бұрын
Clippy as an Onaphim is fantastic
@yuki-sakurakawa
@yuki-sakurakawa Жыл бұрын
Clippynim is the highest order of office angel. 😇
@genghisgalahad8465
@genghisgalahad8465 Жыл бұрын
Ophanim?
@--Paws--
@--Paws-- Жыл бұрын
*Ezekielly Accurate Heavenly Creatures
@ReligionForBreakfast
@ReligionForBreakfast Жыл бұрын
Exactly. Though technically, also Revelationally-Accurate too, since the Book of Revelation draws heavily on Ezekiel's visions.
@falnica
@falnica Жыл бұрын
Manoah: Oh divine messenger! Please explain us your mystical command, so we may follow it The Angel: As I said to your wife, pregnant women shouldn't drink alcohol Manoah: What's your name? The Angel: Lol, as if
@BeepDeige
@BeepDeige Жыл бұрын
@Richdragon more or less the same as the origin of the name "I Am" for God.
@HansLemurson
@HansLemurson Жыл бұрын
We were visited by the great angle Loluseph!
@thomasprislacjr.4063
@thomasprislacjr.4063 Жыл бұрын
@@HansLemurson hail Loluseph! Divine instrument of his will!
@shaolin1derpalm
@shaolin1derpalm Жыл бұрын
She saw a hot dude, he saw an average looking dude.
@jonnylawless6797
@jonnylawless6797 Жыл бұрын
Angels and demons are pretty protective of their names, you can use it against them.
@heressomestuffifound
@heressomestuffifound Жыл бұрын
The fractal multiple eyes is a very common motif in psychedelic experiences too… or so I’m told.
@LimeyLassen
@LimeyLassen Жыл бұрын
Yeah, I respect some religious historians refrain from speculating but it's pretty obvious. Or it could be non-drug induced hallucinations, like from fasting, sensory deprivation, etc.
@LmaoMoni
@LmaoMoni Жыл бұрын
I was *told* that too
@Image1Nation
@Image1Nation Жыл бұрын
I told myself the same thing.
@jonnylawless6797
@jonnylawless6797 Жыл бұрын
Can confirm, three different substances
@goodmorning7358
@goodmorning7358 Жыл бұрын
yeah i *definitely* cant attest myself, but ive heard similar
@jacobduncan2142
@jacobduncan2142 Жыл бұрын
Also, in GDT's Pinocchio, the Wood Sprite that brings him to life is absolutely modelled after one of the types of Angel from Ezekiel.
@chelseariddle6662
@chelseariddle6662 Жыл бұрын
And that model is BEAUTIFUL. I instantly got the reference when I watched the movie and was astounded by the horrifying beauty it held, it genuinely captivated me
@ErikNilsen1337
@ErikNilsen1337 Жыл бұрын
The "biblically-accurate angels" meme is just the new "Super Mario Bros. 2 was actually Doki Doki Panic"; a piece of trivia endlessly parroted by those who think themselves to be "in the know," but has since been so removed from its initial context to the point of being oversimplified and inaccurate.
@ReligionForBreakfast
@ReligionForBreakfast Жыл бұрын
I very much am the intended audience of this analogy.
@ErikNilsen1337
@ErikNilsen1337 Жыл бұрын
@@ReligionForBreakfast That’s because there’s actually a lot of inherent overlap between retro video games and angelology.
@whathell6t
@whathell6t Жыл бұрын
@@ErikNilsen1337 And then there’s Evangelion and Ultraman.
@MisterJang0
@MisterJang0 Жыл бұрын
"Christmas was invented to replace Saturnalia" is also in the same boat. It's cool that the same guy who debunked that also debunked this recent perception of what a "biblically accurate angel" is.
@ErikNilsen1337
@ErikNilsen1337 Жыл бұрын
@@MisterJang0 Oh, geez. That’s another obnoxious one.
@idraote
@idraote Жыл бұрын
I always wonder about the later attempt at establishing a hierachy of angels as if the spiritual world had to reflect the inequalities of our own.
@starmaker75
@starmaker75 Жыл бұрын
An flawed, but human attempt to understand the holy, but strange divinity
@chrissonofpear1384
@chrissonofpear1384 Жыл бұрын
That and it's rather messy politics, as a realm, yes.
@irkendragon
@irkendragon Жыл бұрын
When there's a void of information from a source material, it seems inevitable that people will want to fill in the blanks. And people write what they know.
@CephirDay
@CephirDay Жыл бұрын
@@irkendragon iirc the bible sometimes warns humans to not interpret heavenly beings because we're told it's beyond our comprehension
@remilenoir1271
@remilenoir1271 Жыл бұрын
And who is to say that inequality is a bad thing ? That and the fact that inequality in the spiritual world is a given. God is fundamentaly higher than His creation, and the creation subordinate to him. Inequality is at the very core of monotheism as it puts mankind in relation with an infinite being.
@Matt_The_Hugenot
@Matt_The_Hugenot Жыл бұрын
My very first priest when I was a kid called angels mythical Persian beings and made the congregation sing that well known carol 'Hark the herald mythical Persian beings sing'. He went on to become an Anglican bishop so that must have been a pretty mainstream view in the 1960s.
@pixadavid
@pixadavid Жыл бұрын
Anglican moment
@AngelHernandez-zl5yr
@AngelHernandez-zl5yr Жыл бұрын
Anglicans saying heresies bordering in blasphemy? Who would have thought
@maxxor-overworldhero6730
@maxxor-overworldhero6730 Жыл бұрын
Yeesh.
@vladprus4019
@vladprus4019 Жыл бұрын
What's interesting here that the most common theme in those dscription is pretty much almost always forgotten with modern depictions, including "bibilically accurate" ones - this theme being the fire.
@Malroth00Returns
@Malroth00Returns Жыл бұрын
Bronze age shepherd ate the wrong mushroom and now 5000 years later we have this....
@ridleyroid9060
@ridleyroid9060 Жыл бұрын
There is a video game series, Megami Tensei, where I was introduced to a lot of 'biblically accurate" angels and the biblical lore in relation to them, and a lot of them, like Throne, Merkabah, Mastema, really piqued my curiosity. Really happy to see a video on this. You probl'y have so much more smart things to do but I recommend looking into some of the games from this franchise, it has a metric ton of religious/mythological references and depictions.
@kokuinomusume
@kokuinomusume Жыл бұрын
There's this little anime about giant robots called Neon Genesis Evangelion that also has a bunch of angels... some like Ramiel or Leliel look like geometric shapes, others like Tabris (here be spoilers) go for the humanoid shape.
@fenix0seraph
@fenix0seraph Жыл бұрын
@@kokuinomusume The angels in Evangelion are space aliens who happen to have Hebrew names. At least in SMT they are actually intended to be the deities on some level.
@garvielloken8494
@garvielloken8494 Жыл бұрын
Finally someone mentions SMT under one of these videos, such underrated franchise for history/culture/religion geeks
@whathell6t
@whathell6t Жыл бұрын
@@fenix0seraph Not true. Humanity are Angels descended from Lilith, but when fused with flesh of Adam, they’re more powerful. And the Angels themselves are descended from the Ancestral Race who are said to be the cousins of the Ultra, the people of the Planet of Light-Nebula M78. Hideaki Anno picked up the Abrahamic aesthetics from Ultraman which is created by Eiji Tsuburaya, a devout Catholic convert, and even has the Vulgate (the Latin version of the Bible).
@KidCapes
@KidCapes Жыл бұрын
Shin Megami Tensei is a great experience, it's a shame how detailed the references to religion and philosophy are that often go under-looked. There's really no other video game series like it.
@dargossss
@dargossss Жыл бұрын
I like the term "Angel Magic". I'm gonna try to get a ticket for that class. Thanks for the video!
@harrisonsaunders8529
@harrisonsaunders8529 Жыл бұрын
I don't think you mentioned this, but the fire in the bush and the pillar of flame (I believe) are both described in the Hebrew as mal'akh adonai. Great video though, I've been waiting for one like it.
@thetachmoniteb8069
@thetachmoniteb8069 9 ай бұрын
To add to that, the Lord (YHWH) was in the pillar of cloud by day and pillar of fire by night in Exodus 13:21,22. Then in Exodus 14:19,20 angel of God was in the pillar of cloud guiding Israel in front then went behind Israel; Ex. 14:24 Again, states that YHWH look down on the army of the Ehyptians from in the pillar of fireand cloud. Putting these texts together, YHWH and the Messenger/Angel, is Christ. Similarly, in book of Daniel 10:5, and in Genesis 18, are theophanies of YHWH appearing as a men The certain men in the book of Daniel 10:5 is Christ bearing resemblance to Revelation 1:13-16; could become man, not an angel, but as an epifany of Christ, because he is YHWH, who also, became a man, not an angel, appeared to Abraham in the plains of Mamre, in Genesis 18:1-3.
@joshwood8206
@joshwood8206 Жыл бұрын
We just talked about this in my Medieval Art class today! Imagery of Devine beings from that era is so fascinating and this video just adds to it!
@a.howardsmith3243
@a.howardsmith3243 8 ай бұрын
Why not get SAVED and GO see for your self, Rapture is leaving in a few days !!
@xaayer
@xaayer Жыл бұрын
Thank you for this video. Seeing the memes was fun at first, but the more people took it seriously, the more I got a bit frustrated that no one did the research for themselves.
@stillnoided8280
@stillnoided8280 Жыл бұрын
It hurts a lot that for at least 15 years the wikipedia articles related to the subject take what can only be called a Hard Dyonisian view of things. They place a strange amount of emphasis on the hierarchy texts from him and Maimonides while simultaneously ignoring the huge caveats they put on their own ideas, and then also ignoring the places where scripture doesn't say the same thing. It's easy to do some reading, see that it's cited, and feel like you've done your research without knowing that there's more to the story.
@xaayer
@xaayer Жыл бұрын
@@stillnoided8280 what are you talking about? Did you mean to reply to me or someone else?
@DoctorLazertron
@DoctorLazertron Жыл бұрын
Same here, and maybe I’m overly defensive but it sure feels like another thing in pop culture to try and make Christians look ridiculous.
@xaayer
@xaayer Жыл бұрын
@@DoctorLazertron I don't think it made Christians look ridiculous (though this bus more jewish than Christian tbf) if anything it gave judeo-christian religions street cred with modern audiences. But the thing I didn't like is when people lourded the design.over others as if they knew something others didn't.
@DoctorLazertron
@DoctorLazertron Жыл бұрын
@@xaayer I’m not sure I agree with the street cred thing, but I’m with you on the last part. I also feel like a “correction” on the materialistic description kind of misses the point. I’m sure most people understand it as a symbolic description but the focus is more on the “um, actually” aspect.
@christopherknorr2895
@christopherknorr2895 Жыл бұрын
I always thought that the bizarre descriptions could just be ancient authors attempting to describe a 4th dimensional being dipping into our 3 Dimensional plane
@gjhartist3685
@gjhartist3685 11 ай бұрын
Thats my pet theory too
@indigogodhead6481
@indigogodhead6481 5 ай бұрын
That makes a lot of sense actually …so much sense that It can apply to other beings as well and it still makes sense
@christopherknorr2895
@christopherknorr2895 5 ай бұрын
@@indigogodhead6481 Gods, for instance. A shape shifting god may just be scrolling to a different 3D slice of itself
@MBarberfan4life
@MBarberfan4life 4 ай бұрын
Yes, because apocalyptic literature contains symbolic imagery. It seems most people don’t appreciate different literary genres.
@jacobduncan2142
@jacobduncan2142 Жыл бұрын
I've been waiting for this episode since I found your channel. I always found it fascinating.
@justinward3218
@justinward3218 Жыл бұрын
Be not afraid wasn’t the first thing Gabriel said to Mary. That’s one of the things that makes this meeting unique. He didn’t say that until after she was troubled by his message, not his presence.
@Janizzary
@Janizzary Жыл бұрын
Interesting that the Assyrian main god, Ashur is often shown in a winged wheel of sorts in carved reliefs. Also, the Sumerian gods, like Inanna, had "Sukkal" messengers, like Nin-Shubur.
@Funny_Muffler
@Funny_Muffler Жыл бұрын
I like how you changed 2:43 to “most awe inspiring” instead of “very awesome” 😂
@ReligionForBreakfast
@ReligionForBreakfast Жыл бұрын
Technically I'm quoting the NRSV. The image on screen I think is KJV.
@Funny_Muffler
@Funny_Muffler Жыл бұрын
@@ReligionForBreakfast ah makes sense! I just thought “very awesome” sounded too out of place so you rephrased 😂
@MAMoreno
@MAMoreno Жыл бұрын
@@ReligionForBreakfast The screen image is from the ESV, which is essentially the NRSV for conservative Protestants. The ESV is about 90% similar to the original RSV by some counts, so the differences with the NRSV are minimal. (I could tell that some of the images came from the ESV simply from the distinctive Lexicon font that the publisher Crossway uses for the translation.)
@varana
@varana Жыл бұрын
@@MAMoreno Being able to distinguish translations of the bible by their typography must be some kind of superpower. :D
@personal-qs6dz
@personal-qs6dz Жыл бұрын
"I'm an expert in ancient magic" is a very cool job description
@xxxxneoxxxx
@xxxxneoxxxx Жыл бұрын
I always watch one of your videos before my 7am class (I'm an English teacher in Peru), so really, it is my breakfast. Religion for breakfast. Regards from Peru!
@exvaran
@exvaran Жыл бұрын
Now I want a crossover episode between the two Henry's discussing the angelology of the Star Wars universe based on that one line in The Phantom Menace
@hackman669
@hackman669 Жыл бұрын
What about a video on Star Wars religions?!🐱🦧
@voliol8070
@voliol8070 Жыл бұрын
This one I knew, in bits and pieces, but it's still nice seeing it explained this concisely and in order! :)
@sownheard
@sownheard Жыл бұрын
To bad he skipped the book of creation where it clearly states that angels and fallen angels can take on different forms like shape shifter's because they are beings of creation. No one thinks all angels are snakes 🍎 🐍 even though some presented them like so. while the book also said fallen angels where tempted by the flesh and like living amongst the Humans so they pretend to be human. And that resulted in freak baby's that eventually became so bad he had to reset the earth with Noa's Ark
@chrissonofpear1384
@chrissonofpear1384 Жыл бұрын
@@sownheard And doesn't say why they were allowed to, yeah...
@paulschlachter4313
@paulschlachter4313 Жыл бұрын
@@sownheard From what I read the book of creation is dated later then the new testament and therefore does not contribute to the topic of biblically-accurate angels.
@Your.Uncle.AngMoh
@Your.Uncle.AngMoh Жыл бұрын
I love your research and dedication to the videos you produce. I'm learning so much from you. Thanks, and greetings from Australia.
@jimmywim
@jimmywim Жыл бұрын
Yes! Ancient Magic seminar. This stuff and Justin Sledge's Esoterica are filling my evenings right now :D
@larisael-netanany488
@larisael-netanany488 Жыл бұрын
Just to add 2 cents of a Hebrew speaker, the Hebrew word עיין - primarily translates as eye - is also used to describe a loop, like those you create in netting wool, or a connection point that is a hole. Also it’s used to describe middle like that storms have )the eye of the storm), but this use is not limited to storms. So taking that in ophanim as wheels full of eyes could very be just a blunt translation blunder. Here is a funny lingual exercise I was given as a kid to help me understand Hebrew biblical texts(alas, you have to be Hebrew speaker for that, but it is still fun to hear about): try to describe the caterpillar of a tank or a bulldozer using only words found in the Bible the same way they are used in the Bible and see what you end up with. The result is not too different than taking a paragraph through few hops of google translate, and hopping back to the original language you started with: there is a resemblance but the meaning often is altered.
@asmodeus304
@asmodeus304 Жыл бұрын
thats super interesting actually!! heres a somewhat related fact-theres only 8000 some biblical hebrew words. Total. thats so little! part of the reason the tanakh is a pain to translate/is so vague
@nouhorni3229
@nouhorni3229 9 ай бұрын
That's interesting. In case of the Ophanim though, I'm pretty sure they are supposed to be the literal wheels of god's throne. That's how the translation makes the most sense to me anyway.
@SobekLOTFC
@SobekLOTFC Жыл бұрын
Another great video, Dr Henry- keep up the fantastic work 👏
@nyc88s
@nyc88s Жыл бұрын
I just stumbled upon your channel tonight, and wasted no time in subscribing. Patreon could be next! You are so interesting, and you have fascinating and beautiful presented material. Thank you!
@JonathanGhost42
@JonathanGhost42 Жыл бұрын
Very interesting video! Even as a fan of freakish artistic depictions of "biblically-accurate angels" I knew of the exeggaration that came with that meme (like with many memes)... But what I did not know was, that this different beings are probably some sort of different "kind" of creatures in the mythology. On the one hand this is really fascinating news, but thinking about the diversity in different kinds of spirits and gods in their respective mythologies/religions, it makes definitely sense that there would not be just one kind of heavenly being, but different entities with different forms and functions. (Sorry for My bad English, but I am german and find it simpler to understand the language then write it).
@ReligionForBreakfast
@ReligionForBreakfast Жыл бұрын
Yeah, a good analogy would be a griffin. Would we call a griffin an "angel?" No probably not. It's a "kind" of mythological being.
@JonathanGhost42
@JonathanGhost42 Жыл бұрын
@@ReligionForBreakfast It seems as if there was with time some "thinning out" of a mythology that was probably as diverse as many others in this place and age.
@mormacil
@mormacil Жыл бұрын
@@ReligionForBreakfast There some references to unicorns as angels. Which is an interesting albeit niche take to my understanding.
@whathell6t
@whathell6t Жыл бұрын
@@ReligionForBreakfast What are your thoughts on Angels that are depicted in Hideaki Anno’s Evangelion and the Abrahamic aesthetics in Eiji Tsuburaya’s Ultraman (1966)?
@m8sonmiller
@m8sonmiller Жыл бұрын
Which one did Shinji and Asuka fight by dancing?
@andrewsuryali8540
@andrewsuryali8540 Жыл бұрын
Israfel
@gmcrosa
@gmcrosa Жыл бұрын
Thanks for this channel. Every episode is fascinating. You present solid information but in a very interesting presentation. I'm an ecologists, former catholic, currently atheist but nevertheless fascinated with religions. Keep the good staff! Greetings from Uruguay
@aceofspades3973
@aceofspades3973 Жыл бұрын
This was so interesting and helpful! I always love your detailed and clear explanations. Love that you cite your sources haha. So much content on the Internet is just like, "This is what angels are!" or whatever, and it's like, okay, according to who...? There have been so many different perspectives on angels and attempts to sort them into a hierarchy throughout history, it's never possible to just say definitively what they are or are not, only what certain sources say/what certain sects or individuals believe.
@eziowayne
@eziowayne Жыл бұрын
I really appreciate this channel!
@stillnoided8280
@stillnoided8280 Жыл бұрын
Worth mentioning that Maimonides and the author of De Coelestia Hierarchia both believe that heavenly creatures have no physical form, and all their traits are purely symbolic. The latter calls it "vulgar and irreverent" to imagine that any thing from Heaven has earthly characteristics of wheels or animals. He also has a chapter dedicated to justifying his use of the term angel, showing that he knew it was some thing that needed justification rather than some thing he got from scripture. De Coelestia Hierarchia is afaik our earliest source of a text calling any thing other than an angel proper by that name at around 500 AD.
@BlackReaper0
@BlackReaper0 Жыл бұрын
Yeah, he even says : "And I do not suppose that any sensible man will gainsay that the incongruous elevate our mind more than the similitudes; for there is a likelihood, with regard to the more sublime representations of heavenly things, that we should be led astray, so as to think that the Heavenly Beings are certain creatures with the appearance of gold, and certain men with the appearance of light, and glittering like lightning, handsome," I kind of wish this video had gone more into it, though to be fair, that could be a video of its own.
@ryanbaker614
@ryanbaker614 Жыл бұрын
Really love the artwork for this and the last video.
@c.e.m7535
@c.e.m7535 Жыл бұрын
I love your channel! Thank you, Broseph!
@watchyourlanguage3870
@watchyourlanguage3870 2 күн бұрын
I saw this video a while back (one of my favorite videos on all of KZbin), but this upcoming Shabbat I’m reading the Haftarah portion about Samson’s birth from the book of Judges, so I came back. It was a wild experience reading the first few lines and being like “yo I think this is the story from that video about biblically accurate angels”
@GarajedelMedioCR
@GarajedelMedioCR Жыл бұрын
"I'm an expert in ancient magic"... that should definitely go on a t-shirt!🤣🤣
@sewellparanormal6351
@sewellparanormal6351 Жыл бұрын
Such a great video. Thank you so much.
@amypieterse4127
@amypieterse4127 Жыл бұрын
As always, love your videos.
@lbjcb5
@lbjcb5 Жыл бұрын
This is such a great summary!!
@ToshMatsum
@ToshMatsum Жыл бұрын
"Really bad acid trip" covers every single one of these.
@ninja34744
@ninja34744 Жыл бұрын
"I'm an expert in ancient magic" is a rad flex.
@nichardogallez5584
@nichardogallez5584 Жыл бұрын
Fantastic video, you never disappoint!
@bheemabachus5179
@bheemabachus5179 Жыл бұрын
Every single one of your videos is an instant classic. This is immensely useful. Edit: However, I do have one suggestion. At the end, where you said "just look for a super generic guy and see if he flies into the sky in a fire," it would've been really funny if you video edited yourself doing that.
@scrubadubdub8360
@scrubadubdub8360 Жыл бұрын
I've always loved the idea that these "heavenly creatures" are beings from another dimensional place, and they look all crazy and scary when they come to our three-dimensional space.
@starmaker75
@starmaker75 Жыл бұрын
It also show that the closer to heaven you go, the more surreal and weird it gets. It would be reflect how the angel/divinity look other worldly
@Valerio_the_wandering_sprite
@Valerio_the_wandering_sprite Жыл бұрын
Like Eugene the Jeep?
@kalinmir
@kalinmir Жыл бұрын
3rd dimension?
@oxid71
@oxid71 Жыл бұрын
They are. I saw one with my own eyes and its the only reasonable explanation.
@charlesrb3898
@charlesrb3898 Жыл бұрын
@@oxid71 Tell us more.
@bafys
@bafys Жыл бұрын
Angel: Be not Afraid Human: *Screams out of fear* Angel: 👁👁 👁 👁👁👄👁👁 👁👁👁
@elijahd.techgnostic
@elijahd.techgnostic Жыл бұрын
Fantastic video as always. I'm just wondering, but have you heard of the interpretation of Ezekiels vision where the Cheribum and Ophainum are linked to the constellations of the Babylonian zodiac? The four faces of the Cheribum are linked to the four cardinal directions of the Zodiac and the stars being the 'eyes' that are mentioned, as well as their cyclic motion through the year being the 'wheels' described.
@zeogen
@zeogen Жыл бұрын
I had always heard scholars equate the chair of them to the chair to guarded and pull the arc, and the garden of Eden to the Sphinx, and these other ancient near eastern
@scottm2664
@scottm2664 Жыл бұрын
I love your scholarly explanation in terms others can understand
@ROMANTIKILLER2
@ROMANTIKILLER2 Жыл бұрын
Very interesting summary. I feel like a lot of common debates and misconceptions around visualization of biblical elements very often find their roots in two issues: 1) looking at translations of the texts (be it Greek, Latin Vulgata, or often English/modern language) rather than the original, thus missing the actual meaning of the words chosen by the authors. 2) looking at the texts as a cohesive corpus that remained unchanged over time, rather than something that was discussed and reinterpreted multiple time througout the centuries. Of course there are also other elements, but these I see as recurrent.
@luminous2585
@luminous2585 Жыл бұрын
This was a very insightful video. I was curious where the idea of biblically accurate angels really came from. So, I'm really sorry my comment is going to be this but... I kind of like the idea that people in the past were doing tier lists of their favorite angels similar how people nowadays make tier lists of their favorite anime characters or videogames or whatnot.
@Thelaretus
@Thelaretus Жыл бұрын
As a very devout Catholic Christian scholar I remember the first time someone showed me one of those 'biblically accurate Angels'; I had to go on a lengthy explanation about the distinction between spirit and matter and how spirit has no form, but can project different shapes onto the material world -- one of those being similar to what she showed me, but not limited to it.
@CRneu
@CRneu Жыл бұрын
or none of this is true and it's all made up stories so anything can take any shape in these stories. add in that these were all passed along in a game of telephone and it makes sense that none of this really lines up properly.
@MrCmon113
@MrCmon113 11 ай бұрын
None of that stuff is biblical though. In particular the older stories are free from this modern hogwash and the inhabitants of heaven simply have bodies like everyone else.
@MrCmon113
@MrCmon113 11 ай бұрын
@@CRneu The stories of yore were much better than this belief in a "material" and "spiritual" world though. The latter is just a mythology of excuses. In the original stories, Yahwe and his angels are just dudes hanging out in the sky, in a real, physical location you could visit. That's honest myths.
@entertherealmofchaos
@entertherealmofchaos Жыл бұрын
Can't go wrong with this subject. Well researched video.
@ngusumakofu1
@ngusumakofu1 Жыл бұрын
Brilliant content as usual!
@druidriley3163
@druidriley3163 5 ай бұрын
Jumped to some conclusions. You try to dismiss Ezekiel because no other book mentions angels thus. How do we know Ezekiel isn't correct and the other bible writers changed it because they found Ezekiel's angels horrific? The description of the angel from the book of Daniel doesn't really describe anything human. Body was like beryl - did he mean color? Or shape? Beryls in nature are hexagonal crystals. So did he mean this creature was hexagonal and crystalline? Color-wise, natural beryl can vary from green to pink. Hardly human. Face like lightning? That means blazing, electrical, blinding - white/blue/red? Eyes like flaming torches? I'm not seeing this as human in any way. And if the seraphim were using two wings to hide its face, how do we know that face was human? Snakes, dogs, salamanders, bears, horses, etc, all have faces. Octopi, chameleons and koalas have arms that can grasp things. That doesn't make them 'human like'.
@differous01
@differous01 Жыл бұрын
The Cherubim have virtues represented in Rev4v7 by faces of Lion (warrior), Ox (work), Man (trade) and Eagles (law), corresponding to Judea's 4 main sects at the time (Zealot, Essene, Sadducee & Pharisee). Their vices are expressed in the Horseman each summons in Rev6.
@jhidalgo8592
@jhidalgo8592 Жыл бұрын
I love this channel!
@katew.9402
@katew.9402 Жыл бұрын
Great video, thanks!
@teugene5850
@teugene5850 Жыл бұрын
thank you for your cross-denominational presentation of religious ideas in a fair, balanced and intellectual way... you give me hope for the internet (and possibly the humans also...)
@princesssshortie
@princesssshortie Жыл бұрын
I'm so exited for this one!!
@DoctorLazertron
@DoctorLazertron Жыл бұрын
In Matthieu Pageau’s “Language of Creation” he describes the symbolism of the beings in Ezekiel’s visions, starting with the eagle above, the ox and the lion, and the human in the middle. The eagle representing the heavens, the ox and the lion as 2 depictions of opposite ends of earthly animals, and the human as the intermediary through logos (referring to Adam naming the animals). I’m paraphrasing but there’s a symbolic language in the otherworldly descriptions of angels. I haven’t gotten to the part about the wheels and eyes yet.
@Nstone53
@Nstone53 Жыл бұрын
9:51: Not sure if it matters but I know the term "Prince" used to be the word for what we call a king today. It was around the time of William the Conquerer that the anglo-saxon word for King started to be used in its place and the word prince was pushed down a rank. So if you're referencing a text that was translated after the middle ages, that text may not be referring to those angles at Prince's in the modern sense but more of creatures of the highest order.
@Flozone1
@Flozone1 Жыл бұрын
Since you mentioned the Babylonian exile as a point of change I wonder how post-babylonian angels relate to the Amesha Spenta from Zoroastrianism.
@SlurpGoblin
@SlurpGoblin 5 ай бұрын
Bro if I knew you could get a PhD in Ancient Magic when I was a kid, I would’ve studied harder.
@larsfrosznielsen3536
@larsfrosznielsen3536 Жыл бұрын
Wow at last someone could tell me fair and square what an angel is. I'm educated religion teacher and have told my students about the wheel with eyes as angels.....that is history now. THANK YOU
@kazebaret
@kazebaret Жыл бұрын
So hyped for this lecture!!! Unfortunately, here in Spain it will be around 1 in the morning, of a Thursday... Why do I have to work? Whyyyyyyy? :(
@highlonesomed
@highlonesomed Жыл бұрын
I've always been fascinated w how the Cherubic beasts match the zodiacal constellations that make up four quarters of the Platonic great year (the eagle sign is used instead of scorpio, which it rises with. forgetting that eagle's name tho). The cosmic horror vibes really intensify when you keep that in mind
@SuperGnarWhales
@SuperGnarWhales Жыл бұрын
I didn't know your PhD was in ancient magic that's amazing
@rodrigodepierola
@rodrigodepierola Жыл бұрын
Awesome video. Good research, clealry explained.
@robbabcock_
@robbabcock_ Жыл бұрын
Wonderful stuff!
@fietehermans9903
@fietehermans9903 Жыл бұрын
"I'm an expert in ancient magic" is a sentence you don't here that often these days...
@Fordo007
@Fordo007 Жыл бұрын
I always thought angels looked human when dealing with humans while the visions of them in heaven are their most true form
@pmelsner
@pmelsner Жыл бұрын
Wow! thank you for this awesome video
@DoctorLazertron
@DoctorLazertron Жыл бұрын
Thank your for this, the “biblically accurate” meme has been bothering me and it’s nice to have a reference to clarify it.
@MarcelloInvierno
@MarcelloInvierno Жыл бұрын
12:14 reminds me of The Witcher 3's Gaunter O'Dimm. No fancy clothes, no extraordinary face. He's even present in some scenes during your quest, blending into the crowd. But you have a hard time spotting him. In the end, he's turns out to be quite the opposite of ordinary.
@cthellis
@cthellis Жыл бұрын
I feel like you should use “that’s no fat baby” in every video from now on.
@462n
@462n Жыл бұрын
@11:17 Wow. I guess humanity has been obsessed with arguments on power scaling for centuries.. I'm just imagining some guy from the 5th century talking about the awesome might of Gabriel and some other guy responding to him saying "But can he beat an Ophanim tho?".
@Nero_Karel
@Nero_Karel Жыл бұрын
Great video! Do you plan on maybe covering the Gospel of Nicodemus for Easter this year?
@mdug7224
@mdug7224 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for this. It's very helpful. I can correct myself in my discussions after my gut, 'freaky angels' comments elsewhere.
@kaimamoonfury1335
@kaimamoonfury1335 Жыл бұрын
Used to be pretty heavy into the hermetic stuff, read the golden dawn a whole bunch, etc.... pretty interested to hear an experts take after I've been an atheist for a while now. I like neon Genesis so much in part, because the angels are all weird geometric shapes an such, but we still get some that are the stereotypical depiction too, one of which even is a human-angel hybrid things.
@AlexFariaOliveira
@AlexFariaOliveira Жыл бұрын
Yep that's what I like about Neon Genesis too... sometimes I think we are too uncreative, celestial beings might be so wierd that we maybe could not even realise they are lifeforms. Someone once said that we might not realise that some sort of rock is a lifeform or maybe there are beings that move so slow through time that we couldn't even comunicate with them. Or maybe some might be in higher levels and we might just seen to them like a straight line in a piece of paper. Could you imagine a line in a piece of paper being sentient and wanting to comunicate with us or wondering if there are more inteligent life over there? Maybe even God is just a higher dimension being that we can sometimes feel, but can we communicate with him? Can he make us ascend? The same way we can't grant a line in a paper the 3rd dimension?
@VeraDonna
@VeraDonna Жыл бұрын
I always love your teachings and this one made me laugh. :)
@SuperSpidey313
@SuperSpidey313 Жыл бұрын
"That's no fat baby" - Religion for Breakfast
@Vynzent
@Vynzent Жыл бұрын
This is so perfect out of context lmao
@SuperSpidey313
@SuperSpidey313 Жыл бұрын
@@Vynzent right???
@TheCrimsonPope
@TheCrimsonPope Жыл бұрын
Great video! Doesn't "awesome" in this linguitic historical context mean something more like "respectful fear"-inspiring? Like, scary in the way that inspires reverence?
@fabrisseterbrugghe8567
@fabrisseterbrugghe8567 Жыл бұрын
As a child, I thought God was all ears. Sincerely, if He heard all prayers, I thought every human had her own ear to talk to God.
@mikevargas809
@mikevargas809 Жыл бұрын
love this channel
@winminexp
@winminexp Жыл бұрын
Someone should make “ancient magic accurate guardian angel” memes
@polintr
@polintr Жыл бұрын
If the angel that Samson’s parents saw was forgettable, does that mean Keyser Söze and Linus Caldwell are angels?
@CloroxBleachCompany
@CloroxBleachCompany Жыл бұрын
The biblically-accurate angel memes are always funny 😂
@jillvernes4310
@jillvernes4310 Жыл бұрын
LOL I would pay money to get an app for Biblically Accurate Clippy to tell me "Be Not Afraid" on a regular basis
The Origins of Lilith | Adam's First Wife?
18:40
ReligionForBreakfast
Рет қаралды 1,8 МЛН
What is the Kaaba?
18:38
ReligionForBreakfast
Рет қаралды 290 М.
When someone reclines their seat ✈️
00:21
Adam W
Рет қаралды 26 МЛН
Чай будешь? #чайбудешь
00:14
ПАРОДИИ НА ИЗВЕСТНЫЕ ТРЕКИ
Рет қаралды 2,9 МЛН
WHY THROW CHIPS IN THE TRASH?🤪
00:18
JULI_PROETO
Рет қаралды 9 МЛН
What is the Evil Eye?
18:00
ReligionForBreakfast
Рет қаралды 972 М.
Thomas: The Secret Twin of Jesus?
16:53
ReligionForBreakfast
Рет қаралды 341 М.
The First Baptists, The Last Gnostics: The Mandaeans
48:30
James McGrath
Рет қаралды 33 М.
The History of Hell
9:31
ReligionForBreakfast
Рет қаралды 639 М.
Who were the Nephilim?
14:57
ReligionForBreakfast
Рет қаралды 197 М.
The Book of Enoch Explained
15:00
ReligionForBreakfast
Рет қаралды 4,5 МЛН
The 9 Ranks of Angels
13:27
The Generalist Papers
Рет қаралды 275 М.
The Valentinians: Ancient Christian Gnostics?
24:43
ReligionForBreakfast
Рет қаралды 378 М.
Where is the Tomb of Jesus?
22:39
ReligionForBreakfast
Рет қаралды 469 М.
Why Bible Accurate Angels Are So Creepy
8:52
hochelaga
Рет қаралды 15 МЛН
When someone reclines their seat ✈️
00:21
Adam W
Рет қаралды 26 МЛН