Compare news coverage from diverse sources around the world on a transparent platform driven by data. Try Ground News today and get 40% off your subscription: ground.news/religionforbreakfast
@al3xa7234 ай бұрын
TWELVE SECONDS
@LouieMdeP4 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for giving us all these years of Religion for Breakfast!
@kydoctorsforlife87284 ай бұрын
I like the interpretation that Melchizedek was a priest of Shang Di (Deity Shaddai).
@anarchorepublican59544 ай бұрын
🍳🥐☕📖✨...how timely!...I'm hanging on your every word... I was just preparing a sermon about Melchizedek..for this week's sermon...I was aware of the pervasive "he was Shem", 2nd and 3rd century Rabbinical speculations...but alas, I, was largely ignorant of the older "cosmic Messiah" apocalyptic Essene and Gnostic source. Which seem in some ways, a bit more similar to the Hebrew Epistle...i.e...."Without Father & Mother..." [Heb 7:3]....every schoolchild (and Rabbi) should know that Noah is Shem's father, and his mother, although unnamed, is likewise well known...so, I don't think the Hebrew writer thought he was Shem...
@kaptinmxdnite71774 ай бұрын
@ReligionForBreakfast do you believe in God(s)
@Jopeth234 ай бұрын
> Brings out bread and wine > Blesses Abraham > Gives out 10% of his possessions > Refuses to elaborate > Leaves
@snowman17224 ай бұрын
based
@The_Raven_River4 ай бұрын
Badabing badaboom, amen
@timorean3204 ай бұрын
Was a King, and Priest of Salem (Peace). To be a King, 1 must be of the line of Judah. Priest, line of Levi.
@MiguelDLewis4 ай бұрын
@@timorean320 Those laws didn't start until Moses (and Jethro).
@jaymzx04 ай бұрын
> Makes a small appearance in later chapters
@AIagremm4 ай бұрын
About a month ago I searched for this video because I was convinced you had already made one - and to my surprise it didnt exist yet. Turns out it was just a prophetic vision.
@wes47364 ай бұрын
@@AIagremm - I know this video exists! My evidence is that it was revealed to me in a dream.
@DrVictorVasconcelos4 ай бұрын
Typical, am I right?
@awesomemike15004 ай бұрын
@@DrVictorVasconcelosy’all need to leave him alone a lot of us ear actually do believe in the Bible and God does do a lot…
@loganperry56694 ай бұрын
Not going to lie, when I say this video, and that it was uploaded yesterday, my first thought was "wait didn't he already make a video about this topic?"
@Luubelaar4 ай бұрын
@@wes4736...a dweam within a dweam?
@isaacgray29094 ай бұрын
The Tom Bombadil of the Bible
@ReligionForBreakfast4 ай бұрын
a great analogy
@ErikNilsen13374 ай бұрын
Or is Tom Bombadil the Melchizedek of LOTR?
@wes47364 ай бұрын
@@ErikNilsen1337- true, but Tom Bombadil of the Bible has an alliteration to it :]
@ErikNilsen13374 ай бұрын
@@wes4736 Fair enough.
@hive_indicator3184 ай бұрын
Tom Bombible
@glenn_r_frank_author4 ай бұрын
I think Melchizedek was the producer, and just wanted a cameo in the screenplay so they wrote him in.
@DisposableSupervillainHenchman4 ай бұрын
Honestly this is likeliest answer.
@dragoninthewest14 ай бұрын
@DisposableSupervillainHenchman the first ever author self insert
@raiisbox33714 ай бұрын
@@glenn_r_frank_author I think there was a much bigger story about that character, like Enoch's. They just wiped it out for the reason that it's more detrimental to the main character of the Jewish literature and the whole story.
@fredericdouglas35744 ай бұрын
Alfred Hitchcock approves this comment.
@swausgebouwen1434 ай бұрын
Surprisingly profound statement
@lavnlvas4 ай бұрын
I hear Melchizedek is a merry fellow. His robes are blue and his boots are yellow
@Memfys4 ай бұрын
Moreover, why does the model of Jerusalem look like Edoras? 🤔
@rodgerbaker60453 ай бұрын
Blue and yellow. 2 colors in the temple?
@jamesbrazelle2 ай бұрын
Squints…. Is this some Freemason stuff? 👁️:)
@skaramicke2 ай бұрын
@@jamesbrazelleTom Bombadil
@olecranonrebellion99762 ай бұрын
Dont forget his rubber azzhole.
@FRTG994 ай бұрын
>Barges into the OT >Blesses Abraham >Refuses to elaborate further >Leaves and is never heard of again (OR NOT?) Truly a Biblical GIGACHAD
@BasileosHerodou4 ай бұрын
Was probably not a worshipper of the abrahamic god. Gets venerated in both Judaism and Christianity like a chad
@Bean-tp7bw4 ай бұрын
@@BasileosHerodou the Bible says other wise my guy
@BasileosHerodou3 ай бұрын
@@Bean-tp7bw that vile book is about as reliable as me writing down that my friend revealed to be god twenty years ago, I literally have no evidence but trust me.
@constantineolkasis3 ай бұрын
@@BasileosHerodou no
@constantineolkasis3 ай бұрын
@@BasileosHerodou thats stupid what source do you have to prove that?
@JKTCGMV134 ай бұрын
“Born circumcised” interesting
@DrVictorVasconcelos4 ай бұрын
Just like God.
@celestialknight23394 ай бұрын
@@DrVictorVasconcelos God was never born, nor gives birth.
@GameTimeWhy4 ай бұрын
@@celestialknight2339doesnt exist either.
@Stop_The_Car4 ай бұрын
@celestialknight2339 were you there?
@MaryamMaqdisi4 ай бұрын
@@GameTimeWhy God as a biblical character is as real as Abraham and everyone else. You can consider it as a myth without being rude about it.
@swensandor4 ай бұрын
I think, Henoch/Enoch is absolutely as mysterious as Melchizedek. Both are very strange figures.
@TheArmchairPriest4 ай бұрын
His origins are in sumer where his name is translated as Enmendurana, then in persia as Etana, then in Judea as Hanok, in Arabia as Idris, in Greece as Emaha, and today in english as Enoch He is second spirit of God out of the seven found in Revelation, also known as the main seven sons of man. Adam, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and Michael
@theophrastusbombastus13594 ай бұрын
@@TheArmchairPriestI would love some links to that if you have them handy?
@TheArmchairPriest4 ай бұрын
@@theophrastusbombastus1359 youtube sends my links to spam. Just research those individual names yourself, avoid google itself but it can give the sources
@friday26th4 ай бұрын
Enoch while being mysterious in the canonical texts has a whole book centered around him. Malkizedek doesn't, so it makes him a wee bit more mysterious
@friday26th4 ай бұрын
@@TheArmchairPriest the name Hanoch arguably means "the initiated" in Hebrew which fits with his narrative purpose in the apocryphal literature - he came to learn of the Cosmological nature of the world, and to learn timekeeping hence he was "initiated in divine knowledge"
@paulkoza86524 ай бұрын
Nice job as always, Andrew. Having been raised a Catholic, Melchizedek always comes up in the order of the Mass with respect to the consecration of bread and wine.
@derekpmoore4 ай бұрын
Also, Catholic priesthood is the Melchizedek priesthood and it is passed from one priest to another by the laying on of hands.
@AndImsomelady3 ай бұрын
I didn’t realize that. I’ve only heard about Melchizedek priesthood in a Mormon context. I believe that they also use the laying of hands to pass it on, or bestow it. Sorry not sure about the verbiage.
@cooldude711202 ай бұрын
Yep, and Scott Hahn believes Melchizadek may have been Shem himself… which would make a lot of sense.
@redredbluemustardАй бұрын
@@AndImsomelady You are correct. Young men are ordained initially with the priesthood of Aaron, and later graduate in responsibility. Around the time of typical adulthood, priests are given additional keys we call the Melchizedek priesthood.
@AndImsomeladyАй бұрын
@@redredbluemustard thanks!
@edwardspencer39064 ай бұрын
As a "non-theist" I can't tell you how much I enjoy your channel! Dr. Sledge speaks very highly of you..I see WHY now.. Thank You for such a clear eyed view of these stories.. Informative and entertaining!
@theoriederausgrenzung0074 ай бұрын
This channel is so underrated. Thanks for all this dep- dive videos. I love it. Especially because i can't find anything similiar in my language Greetings from germany
@Awesomewithaz4 ай бұрын
Let's Talk Religion and Religion for Breakfast upload within minutes of each other? Best lunch break
@karenspivey32034 ай бұрын
What is "Let's talk religion" ?
@HaroldHivart4 ай бұрын
@@karenspivey3203 It's a religion channel that speaks mainly about islam..
@karenspivey32034 ай бұрын
@@HaroldHivart found it...thank you.
@HaroldHivart4 ай бұрын
@@karenspivey3203 you're welcome.. 🙂
@finrodfelagund86684 ай бұрын
@@HaroldHivart Nah, this is a bad description of the channel. It gives the impression that 90% of his videos are about Islam. I love his channel because he represents different religions in a way that is not biased towards secular academic interpretation (mostly). If he makes a video about Zoroastrism, for example, he will talk about what Zoroastrians believe, not what people in academic circles think about the religion. I love his video "What is Hesychasm?" the most.
@sodadrinker894 ай бұрын
Melchizedek was a time traveler.
@lukewormholes53884 ай бұрын
Aliens
@frankjimenez46014 ай бұрын
Maybe pointing to reincarnation.
@irtnyc4 ай бұрын
No, the book was compiled slowly over time and edited, revised, and redacted incoherently by different groups of men with divergent goals and beliefs. We already know this. Time travel not required. This is not an Einstein level problem. It's an Occam level problem.
@phoenicia13134 ай бұрын
dr york
@matthewmaxcy15743 ай бұрын
@@irtnycit is a unforgivable sin to edit or add to the Bible ,secondly the King James aligns identical to the Jewish writings ,and that being said bibles found in Ethiopia thousands of yrs old are also identical to the words in king James as it is today.. so there goes your theory and lies
@Magic-mystery-man4 ай бұрын
On the nature of Melchizedek: in Hebrews 7;3 he is cleary a supernatural and divine entity, since Melchizedek is refered to as being "without beginning of days and end of life, without father and mother" and also "remains forever". Dr Michael S. Heiser also explained (see on youtube: "Was Melchizedek Jesus?") that his name actually does not translate as "king of righteousness", but more likely: "my king IS righteousness". This is ofcourse a reference to God, being the kings of kings, the one who is pure righteousness. Furthermore, one manuscript among the Dead Sea Scrolls, 11Q13, mentions Melchizedek as being the head of the divine council. Douglas Van Dorn gives some arguments to equate Melchizedek with Jesus (see his book The Angel of the Lord - Appendix V).
@ttterg61524 ай бұрын
Melchizedekism
@nicechock4 ай бұрын
That context speaks of Enoch as him. But later on I think they called Shem that. Its a sort of title too.
@ilikestarsun4 ай бұрын
I believe he is God, God takes on different names depending on the role he plays. In Genesis it says he is the forever priest of the most high, forever indicating he is immortal, and the order of a Melkizadec indicating he is the one who initiates the adepts into immortality. The Order of Melkizadec is one of the most concealed secrets and Genisis is purposely writen in a confusing way because the people of earth are not supposed to know these things without reaching the level required to know. If we know without preparation, we will be held more accountable for what we do wrong, since we know what most dont know and continue to act in disharmony with it, when we are prepared to handle such knowledge then we will know not before otherwise this kind of knowledge can be more dangerous than helpful. The order of Melkizadec still exists and that is our final initiation into immortality, to know what it is we must be living correctly otherwise we cannot say we acted wrongly out of ignorance, this is why it is reserved for those who are prepared to understand and work for the will of God alone.
@warmbeergamingdude3 ай бұрын
@@nicechockit was Jesus man, you thinking to hard lol. Christ told you so already that Abraham was proud to see him.
@watema33813 ай бұрын
@@warmbeergamingdude What Bible verse?
@chorabari4 ай бұрын
Having just re-read Genesis for the first time in decades, this video was very timely!
@piratesapper3 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@nikok4104 ай бұрын
Great topic! I'm an agnostic atheist but I read the whole Bible and I love all the lore, especially the obscure and extra-biblical stuff
@angelicentity14014 ай бұрын
Thoughts on eastern orthodoxy?
@user-ex9dx7gt4o3 ай бұрын
Read with your heart and a prayer. You are accountable for what you know but don’t take to heart
@labren2 ай бұрын
@@user-ex9dx7gt4oNo need to be rude, it's okay to read something interesting, even if you don't personally believe it to be true!
@CorePathway2 ай бұрын
@@user-ex9dx7gt4oThe Christian God knows that His message has failed for 2000 years; the vast majority of humans alive today and have ever lived are not believers. God knows this but does not take this to heart! 😂
@willlull5719Ай бұрын
@niko410 You don’t have to wonder, you can know. Seek the spirit, step into the spirit and discover the truth.
@bard_of_dundee4 ай бұрын
I've always been partial to the _midrash_ that Melchizedek is Shem son of Noah. According to a literal reading of the timeline given, he would have still been alive during Abraham's life, and could have maintained the monotheistic religion!
@nicechock4 ай бұрын
Melchizedek is a sort of Title. They called Enoch that and Shem later.
@jamesdegon2768Ай бұрын
Without mother or father,cannot be.
@KevinWarburton-tv2iy2 күн бұрын
The Title is Priest-King & the Enoch & Shem were later Priest-Kings of the Order Of Melchizedek. There was a first one though his actual name was Kesed. then Abraham's Nephew was anointed & sent to rule Chaldea :)
@jacktingey78864 ай бұрын
Most Mormon denominations revere Melchizedek, despite knowing little about him. The LDS Church's highest priesthood authority is of Melchizedek.
@DiscoDumpTruck4 ай бұрын
"Revere" is a strong word here. You're right that Latter-day Saints don't know anything about him. The highest priesthood authority is named after him and that's about it. But whenever they talk about where that Priesthood comes from, they generally talk about how they believe it's the same priesthood that was given to Jesus's original apostles. Whether it is literally the same priesthood held by Melchizedek is not really the focus.
@jacktingey78864 ай бұрын
@@DiscoDumpTruck According to LDS tradition, Melchizedek gave the priesthood to Abraham. The word "revere" in this case would mean hold in a high place of honor or reverance. LDS tradition says relatively little about Enoch or Ephraim, and yet they hold special significance in the LDS tradition beyond their limited mentions. Nations will revere Joseph Smith, WW Phelps wrote. One LDS hymn evens refers to revering the pioneers, so I would be comfortable in using the word to describe special notice and respect to Melchizedek.
@DiscoDumpTruck4 ай бұрын
@@jacktingey7886 Revere in that sense is fair. Thanks for clarifying. I will say that Latter-day Saints do say quite a bit more about Enoch with his several chapters in the Pearl of Great Price, but you make a good point about Ephraim.
@jacktingey78864 ай бұрын
@@DiscoDumpTruck Good point, Enoch has a whole backstory and panoramic vision in the POGP.
@sour-is4 ай бұрын
@@DiscoDumpTruck I wouldn't say that Latter-day Saints don't know anything about him. Take Doctrine and Covenants 107 for example that establishes the organization of the priesthood. The name of that priesthood was given the label of Melchizedek to avoid repeating the full name. It also explains that the highest priesthood authority was passed down from Adam through the antediluvian lineage. In Section 84 it explains from Noah it was passed down to Abraham through Melchizedek and then down to Moses where the appendage of the Levitical priesthood was created. There is a lot of evidence about his importance within the LDS teachings that existed before Nag-Hamadi and Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered. And that the priesthood has been passed down from the beginning with Adam. Restored through Jesus (who was the original source). And restored again to Joseph Smith.
@lloydritcheyАй бұрын
I'm preparing myself to go through RCIA after a lifetime of atheism, and I deeply appreciate your contribution to my education in your capacity as an objective analyst. Thank you so very much for adding further depth & complexity to my understanding.
@sindri.8 күн бұрын
I'm in it right now. Joining the church in April.
@therenewedpoet42923 ай бұрын
"Born circumcised" going on the resume
@hallowed2 ай бұрын
Epic
@Madasin_Paine2 ай бұрын
Heading of Resume. *Be bold*
@darukutsuАй бұрын
i was born bald, small, without knowledge of any language. Now I'm big, have hair and speak languages.
@shriggs554 ай бұрын
I've always wondered about Melchizedek.It is amazing that you were able to get so much information out of so little information.I like your work.
@jonathanpiwright34354 ай бұрын
When I first read The Alchemist by Paulo Coelho I was so stoked when Mechizedek appeared. Having such a niche Biblical figure was so cool
@alexross181613 күн бұрын
Melchizedek: "I guess you guys aren't ready for that yet, but your kids are gonna love it."
@mrjoe52924 ай бұрын
I remember using Melchizedek in Persona 3, a ps2 JRPG I played when I was younger. His design was striking and his name stuck out to me as unique and cool, even standing out from the numerous other mythology and religion inspired demons/characters and their names. Thanks for the video!
@banjo3044 ай бұрын
Fun fact, Melchizedek's design in the Megami Tensei games is based off of Redeemer from Spawn. The artist for those games, Kazuma Kaneko, was pretty into Spawn and based another design (Zaou Gongen) more loosely off of Spawn himself.
@garvielloken84944 ай бұрын
He is also present in Shin Megami Tensei V
@EbonySaints2 ай бұрын
Whenever there's a video on an esoteric factoid of any religion, you can be sure that SMT fans are lurking about. Also, P3 got a modern remake if you have the time for sinking 100+ hours into it again.
@stephanieparker12504 ай бұрын
Have you done a video on the origins of circumcision yet?
@MK-lh3xd4 ай бұрын
Yes, I am also interested in this topic. Another topic I am interested in is about the religious commands dictating baking unleavened bread.
@johnfohey56944 ай бұрын
Please!!
@redmoonfilms4 ай бұрын
I think it was originally an Egyptian practice, given the obsidian stone they used.
@AmachiEligwe4 ай бұрын
It was adopted from Eastern Sudanic speakers by Cushitics and Egyptians and from Egypt to Canaan.
@stephanieparker12504 ай бұрын
@@AmachiEligwe oh! I need to read more on this! Thank you so much!
@DeOccultaPhilosophia3 ай бұрын
Your Channel is a treasure of knowledge, thank you
@MobiusCoin4 ай бұрын
It's so weird how these ancient scribes make the most unclear edits. I guess narrative flow and style hadn't been solidified yet but damn, they don't just append or prepend to a story. There's no foreshadowing, it's BAM right in the middle and of a conversation.
@GRB-tj6uj4 ай бұрын
Most of the time they had specific aims that are hard to comprehend for modern readers, due to translation, cultural differences and the weight of 3000 years of interpretation. If you know what they're trying to do there's a lot of elegance in biblical narrative (see "The Art of Biblical Narrative" by Robert Alter or his translations)
@rinnachi4 ай бұрын
@@GRB-tj6uj thank you so much for the book rec, will be checking this out
@nkanyezihlatshwayo36014 ай бұрын
I suspect a Big Picture/Small Canvas problem - books only really got “better” when the costs of time and materials went significantly down
@Tinil04 ай бұрын
@@nkanyezihlatshwayo3601 Think about how terrible everyone is when they start writing the first time. And then realize that bronze age scribes didn't exactly get to practice much...Some of the most culturally important written stories from ancient times may have been one of the first things that author has written!
@samhainabyss4 ай бұрын
and on top of that, one story teller is less inclined to care about small details like history and context and more about the themes they want to communicate
@TheMichaelmorad4 ай бұрын
Melchizedek is split into two parts in the Hebrew bible: Melchi and Zedek. malchi means "my king" and zedek (zedeq) means "rightousness".
@MikeDCWeld4 ай бұрын
I'm just going to believe that the Salem it refers to is in Massachusetts.
@lioicxc68274 ай бұрын
Nope but there's a link.
@RobertGarlinghouse3 ай бұрын
Capitol of Oregon.
@ShawneenBear3 ай бұрын
A village of 800 in NW South Carolina
@lioicxc68273 ай бұрын
Has nothing to do with a region though... It's all related to ancient practices.
@weijie86624 ай бұрын
to be honest i never really interested in western religion stuff, but ur storytelling skill is just amazing.
@siddhartacrowley4 ай бұрын
Western?
@varana4 ай бұрын
@@improvyt6814 Which may still be "western" from an East Asian point of view.
@MiguelDLewis4 ай бұрын
Egyptian*
@lioicxc68274 ай бұрын
The truth is the real Melchizedech is not Western...
@SelendekiАй бұрын
@@lioicxc6827 It's a European religion now, that is what time does.
@stargatis4 ай бұрын
I love learning about Melchizedek!
@lioicxc68274 ай бұрын
The truth about Melchizedek you're not going to find on KZbin.
@skyninjaslayer3373 ай бұрын
@@lioicxc6827😧
@lioicxc68273 ай бұрын
@@skyninjaslayer337 Just being honest. It takes to know many cultures and things to understand it. A lot of history is just taking from one culture and modifying it to fit a certain narrative. If the Abrahamic faiths were to reveal it, it would put many things into question, especially with the Christian church. That's why they kept it obscure.
@youremakingprogress1444 ай бұрын
I was raised in the LDS/Mormon church, and they taught us that Abraham "paid his tithing" to Melchizedek, not that it was a one-time payment. Mormons (who use lay clergy) also have a higher priesthood called the Melchizedek and a lower priesthood called the Aaronic; this video gave me some insight on why they picked those names.
@DisposableSupervillainHenchman4 ай бұрын
Still a Mormon or no?
@youremakingprogress1443 ай бұрын
@@DisposableSupervillainHenchman I stopped believing when I was 14.
@KevinWarburton-tv2iy2 күн бұрын
One of the things they got right :)
@s7jworthington3 ай бұрын
Your channel is my new favourite channel. Thank you for your videos!
@snappystettner4 ай бұрын
All of these videos are so fascinating. I'd like to see you do a series on Hinduism. I think it's a widely misunderstood religion
@jinxhijinx17683 ай бұрын
Comparing you in this video to the version of you in videos 8 years ago is wild. You used to be so high energy and now you seem like a sage
@pauldaplayfulpanda30424 ай бұрын
Ayy I knew a kid named Melchizedek in high school, I wonder how his parents chose such an mysterious name for him
@PamelaContiGlass4 ай бұрын
And I bet everyone just called him "Mel".
@pauldaplayfulpanda30424 ай бұрын
@@PamelaContiGlass yup!
@absurdum-the-artist3 ай бұрын
Thanks for the idea, gonna name my son Melchizedek and his brother Enoch
@eziowayne4 ай бұрын
Love this channel!
@Ofallthings0894 ай бұрын
If the Melchizedek verses were a later Hellenistic insertion, why have Melchizedek clearly praise the Canaanite deity El Elyon in that later addition to the text and not Yahweh?
@bernardraath73904 ай бұрын
He might not be fond of fire breathing dragons
@MiguelDLewis4 ай бұрын
Because he wasn't a later Hellenistic insertion. The man in this video doesn't know the Tanakh.
@OsirisLord4 ай бұрын
Yeah I'm going to go with it sounds like Abraham stopped by a Mesoptomian city and meet with the priest-king. Like we know in Genesis Abraham came from Ur which is in Southern Iraq and journeyed through Mesopotamia into Canaan and I think Egypt (or was that Joseph). Anyway Mesopotamian cities were ruled by priest-kings because their religion held that gods owned the cities and only priests could have the power to collect taxes. So I'm thinking he stopped by a city in Iraq, met the king, and the Hebrews used the title El Elyon to refer to his god because that's probably what Melchizedek would have called his city's patron god even if it was like Enlil or Ashur or Ninurta.
@thomasridley86754 ай бұрын
@@MiguelDLewis Twisting reality to fit their expectations is how they have created such a diverse, fought over and agenda driven religious theology. However these divisions have weakened their control of the narrative. And created a declining number of believers, i mean suckers, to pull from.
@will1227514 ай бұрын
Because that's not what he said. He said the "YHWH" part is missing from the Septuagint, the Greek translation from the Hellenistic Era, so it must have been inserted later for the Masoretic Text, which was made centuries later and has the "YHWH"
@michaeldionne24384 ай бұрын
i'm so hooked on this channel
@AmberSixtyFour4 ай бұрын
Thank you! I always appreciate your Shin Megami Tensei lore videos!
@Ratciclefan4 ай бұрын
Wait does he actually make Shin Megami Tensei?
@Mhdalzein4 ай бұрын
A man of culture indeed
@MaryamMaqdisi4 ай бұрын
@@Ratciclefan no, it's just a joke :)
@crusader_2028Ай бұрын
Your knowledge is as complete and thorough as Billy Carsons!
@Damons-Old-Soul4 ай бұрын
Using "was priest" to assume past tense is a complete lack of understanding of the English language. The passage is written in 3rd person partisan, meaning the author is writing from the point of view of someone explaining an event in the author's/narrator's past. It does not mean that he was not such in his own time. Also "was priest" implies only priest. "Was (a) priest" would mean one among many. I really would hope that scholarship was better than using a translation and a lack of grammatical understanding, to base an argument.
@bruhice6058Ай бұрын
Yup
@Kayclau4 ай бұрын
Even tho I'm no longer a christian, learning about different interpretations of the Bible is so fascinating to me.
@ryannel38994 ай бұрын
I named my rooster after him
@jurischwarzer98774 ай бұрын
Pretty cool name for a rooster
@threetrismegistus4 ай бұрын
AP?
@servantofGod-xyz4 ай бұрын
A Cool name for a cool pet
@jjs84264 ай бұрын
@@threetrismegistusnew AP? Flood. Water on my but like a tub.
@Redmancala4 ай бұрын
Ive been waiting for someone to make a video about him! Such a mysterious character in the Bible
@silasfrisenette92264 ай бұрын
I guess the interpretation of Salem as Jerusalem relies heavily on the latter part being identical (Jeru-Salem), and if my minimal Sumerian skills serve me right, URU is the Sumerian cuneiform determinative for city, which would be written in front of a city's name (as in, URU-Salem). I don't know how that linguistics detail could overlap or if it is even plausible for that to be the case, but it could be why Salem has been interpreted as Jerusalem, because it literally would read as "The City of Salem" in Sumerian 😁
@silasfrisenette92264 ай бұрын
I see that the name Urušalimum in Egyptian texts from the 19th c. BCE may have referred to Jerusalem, which would have been contemporary I think with the Sumerians. Regardless, it would have had to be a colloquial name by the Sumerians, readopted by the people in the city, which doesn't seem likely, but the fact that it lines up with "The City of Salem" is kinda interesting and possibly what made Jewish scholars equate the two? A similar mixing of languages is Istanbul (from Eis thn polis, 'into the city'). Also, of course, Salem was a Caananite deity, which follows the tradition in the area to name cities after deities thought to protect the cities (think Athens, Tarhuntasha, etc.). Of course, it could also be entirely Hebrew or Semitic at least and have just been interpreted as "The City of Salem" by Sumerians 🤭
@ziontours58934 ай бұрын
It also relies on Psalms 76:2-3.
@crobinso20104 ай бұрын
Wikipedia says in the Canaanite period (14th century BCE), Jerusalem was named as Urusalim on ancient Egyptian tablets, probably meaning "City of Shalem" after a Canaanite deity. Bible claims Shalem means "Place of Peace" but that is what the Canaanite god Shalim is named after.
@silasfrisenette92264 ай бұрын
@@crobinso2010 but where does "city" come from if not uru (in Sumerian)?
@robinmundoo378Ай бұрын
You are not far from kingdom
@Brian-----4 ай бұрын
Thank you for explaining this key topic so concisely. I am watching again.
@unrightist4 ай бұрын
1:00 is that why Superman is from the House of El?
@SMVoid4 ай бұрын
Superman was the creation of two young Jewish boys. What do you think...
@unrightist4 ай бұрын
@@SMVoid I am aware of that, yes, hence the train of thought. Isn't the same as a confirmation.
@PutinTheShow2 ай бұрын
el is the supreme and the sun
@MrDanielEarleАй бұрын
Yes. He was inspired by Moses and Samson. Moses was the Voice of God, or "Kol El" in Hebrew. Sound familiar?
@KorraTransPhoenix4 ай бұрын
When I first heard of Melchizedek in Carrier's 'On The Historicity of Jesus' I wanted to know more about him. The character must have slipped my mind until now. Great video, as always!
@slowdownex4 ай бұрын
I know that you could apply this logic literally anywhere, but seriously guys. Why would an omnipotent, omnipresent, god that created everything and keeps it as an open secret, even CARE about who gets blessed first in some random greeting? That's so inconsequential even some people wouldn't care about that. Let alone a being that's allegedly above all human matters.
@user-ex9dx7gt4o11 күн бұрын
@@slowdownex it wasn’t a random meeting. Nothing God did was random and Abraham is the lynchpin of the Old Testament. This person is a foreshadowing of the Messiah Jesus
@arsavarese85Ай бұрын
This was a great explanation. Thank you.
@philr71524 ай бұрын
So this is the guy from that Sleep/OM lyric - Walk Melchizidek shrine descender
@thegreyetch3 ай бұрын
Yeah they have lots of biblical references. One of the original members of SLEEP left to become an Orthodox Christian monk. He founded the DEATH TO THE WORLD zine. Interesting guys for sure. Cool music, too.
@philr71523 ай бұрын
@@thegreyetch yeah definitely wild stuff. I did check out the magazine thing that was made - death to the world. Very interesting blend of ethos with punk/metal and orthodox/apocalyptic monasticism. Similar vibe as OM. I had no clue one of them was involved tho!
@potto14883 ай бұрын
@@thegreyetchI knew the first part, but I did NOT know the second, that's sick!
@aaronanytime88974 ай бұрын
WOW! This video took me on quite the journey!
@KelsJune3 ай бұрын
Wait a minute, isn’t Jesus Melchezedek? I mean he said before Abraham was, I am. Isn’t Jesus called the same titles as Melchezedek? Prince of Peace, our High Priest…..
@rameybutler-hm7nx2 ай бұрын
No.
@briankregg63292 ай бұрын
No is the correct answer
@robinmundoo378Ай бұрын
You are not far from kingdom
@legacyvaultchannel4 ай бұрын
I had no idea Melchizedek's role in the Bible was so complex! The connection between him and Jesus makes so much sense now.
@Madasin_Paine2 ай бұрын
Seems like an angel or another kind of Jesus Being....7 Spirits. It must've been wonderful to not feel so alone, together, but?
@PADARM4 ай бұрын
I believe Melchizedek was an Angel of The Lord or God himself. Shanah Tovah
@titusbaum96903 ай бұрын
Same deal. The Angel of The Lord is Christ before he was incarnate as Jeshua (Jesus). And I agree.
@jenaromurillo8013Ай бұрын
Thank you Ian Hecox
@eeeeeeee-l7zee29 күн бұрын
😂
@TwoDaysFromRetirement4 ай бұрын
13:32 this man is posted up beyond any possible physical necessity
@gtgodbear63202 ай бұрын
Everything happens for a reason and we needed Melchizedek to get to where we are today. God set everything in motion to get the best possible result at the end.
@Alverant4 ай бұрын
Genesis 16 has a woman named Hagar. I think she would make an interesting episode.
@jzilla9894 ай бұрын
She's an alien. Voltron is her crazy anime sequel.
@KristenK783 ай бұрын
@@jzilla989she’s a witch! 😂
@robbabcock_4 ай бұрын
Thanks for another fantastic video!
@solalflechelles12164 ай бұрын
The Is That In The Bible blog just did an article on this! Is it a collab, or just a coincidence?
@josephbouchard34594 ай бұрын
17:12 As an Oklahoman, was not expecting to see my state name dropped like this. I wish we could be in the news for something not horrible.
@ScarlitWidow4 ай бұрын
3:10 Enochich cinematic universe 🤣❤️👍🏻
@MiguelDLewis4 ай бұрын
These anachronistic jokes are the reason why the gentiles remain confused.
@LostRoswellian4 ай бұрын
I chuckled out loud....😂
@richardglady30094 ай бұрын
Complicated topic…well handled and explained. Thank you.
@MaryamMaqdisi4 ай бұрын
Fascinating. Thank you so much for exploring this character. I don't have much to add but I hope this helps with the algorithm lol.
@swiftcee2663 күн бұрын
The figure of Melchizedek the priest king of Salem carrying the ground chalice with the Grail stone protruding from it. An initiate to whom Abraham paid tithes, so he was a man of some considerable importance. In the story of Abraham, he had his son bound and ready for sacrifice, and at their feet was a rams head. The ram that was actually used for sacrifice when Abraham at this moment received a message from an angel who's above Melchizedek’s head saying that human sacrifice was no longer necessary or required by the people of Israel.
@contextfree4 ай бұрын
What about Psalm 110 in the understanding of older Melchizedek traditions?
@bl45424 ай бұрын
Dude !!! Thank you for this video !!!
@theophrastusbombastus13594 ай бұрын
Edgar Cayce said Melchizadek was a previous incarnation of Jesus Whatever you may think of Cauce and his work, when you go back and read the passages in the Bible in that new light, they make a little more sense
@mcv21784 ай бұрын
If Melchy is immortal, how would that work?
@rukiaguy4 ай бұрын
Ihad a dream a few years back. where, I was placed in a tower and, had to elevate above further and further while facing certain trials which assumingly got increasingly more and more difficult. By the end of the dream I reached floor 37, meet a being and woke up. In my head a thought resonated inside of my head and the word Melchizedek appeared. I did not know what or who that is, only I had knew I heard it before. I looked up the word on google and was informed.
@mikeharrison18684 ай бұрын
I think religious texts should be taught in schools, along with critical thinking and lit-crit approaches to them. That would hopefully be a good innoculation against fundamentalist takes on it all.
@xc84872 ай бұрын
While that sounds great it would be impossible in practice. For starters which religion's texts? How in depth? For public schools it would be very problematic being that you can't prioritize one religion over others.
@ObsidianHoax4 ай бұрын
King of Righteousness. A notable prophet and leader who lived about 2000 B.C. He is called the king of Salem (Jerusalem), king of peace, and “priest of the most High God.” Unfortunately, information concerning him in the Bible is relatively scarce, limited to Gen. 14:18-20; Heb. 5:6; 7:1-3. Mention of the priesthood of Melchizedek is given in several other instances, primarily in Psalms and in Hebrews. However, latter-day revelation gives us much more about him and his priesthood (Alma 13:14-19; D&C 84:14; 107:1-4). From these sources we realize something of the greatness of this prophet and the grandeur of his ministry.
@Svartalf144 ай бұрын
I thought that Enoch was the most mysterious figure in the bible
@pufflepoint4 ай бұрын
I'd agree, but there is a perspective where you can say that analysis of Enoch is a very shallow well to draw from, whereas Melchezidic, while having more written about him in the text, draws out more questions and mystery.
@sour-is4 ай бұрын
There are many. Balaam, and his talking donkey. Deborah who sat under the Deborah tree and settled disputes among the Israelites.
@jeremiahlyleseditor4373 ай бұрын
Great explanation of Melchizedek.
@tomponce81884 ай бұрын
Born circumcised? what?
@MiguelDLewis4 ай бұрын
Circumcision of the heart maybe? (Deuteronomy 10:16)
@MusicalRaichu4 ай бұрын
what, a birth defect? doesn't that disqualify him from being a priest?
@ziontours58934 ай бұрын
It still happens to some baby boys.
@nicechock4 ай бұрын
Symbolically. He was born righteous
@HarshDude1264 ай бұрын
@@nicechock No, literally. You don't get to wave away everything that doesn't make sense in the bible with muh sYmBoLiSm. Admit when your holy book is stupid.
@Nooticus4 ай бұрын
Really cool video. I've always wanted to understand this mysterious character
@jfv264 ай бұрын
Every time I see you I think of Ian from Smosh
@SuperBluebirdie4 ай бұрын
I agree. However, poor doc Henry needs to trim that football helmet he's wearing on his head. Lol
@sniedendepoes4 ай бұрын
@@SuperBluebirdieno it looks great
@mjolninja93584 ай бұрын
Side characters that were either removed or only appearing once are an interesting topic
@allandsbrite93984 ай бұрын
I think the fact that Shem was an ancestor of Abraham is an important aspect of the discuss
@karenspivey32034 ай бұрын
I've always found Melchizedek fascinating.
@LogicalMan64 ай бұрын
1 minute in and an ad for a free book of mormon plays 😂
@DavidAlastairHayden4 ай бұрын
😂 Once you go KZbin Premium you can never go back.
@MaryamMaqdisi4 ай бұрын
@@DavidAlastairHaydenyeah, or AdBlock if you can't afford premium
@Magplar4 ай бұрын
Watched a video from James Tabor on Melchizedek about a year ago and that name has probably stuck with me more than any other for whatever reason. I find myself randomly blurting out the name even. I look forward to this video!
@orangemanbad4 ай бұрын
Malchezidek seems clearly a foreshadow of Christ. He was the King of Jerusalem. A priest king with no parentage who brings bread and wine and receives tithe.
@yaitz33134 ай бұрын
...or, alternatively, the narrative of Jesus was shaped around Melchizedek.
@bocoom4 ай бұрын
Christ was literally born from a human woman so your lazy attempt at comparison is invalid.
@orangemanbad4 ай бұрын
@@bocoom with God as his father… name ankther like him .
@hrhamada1982Ай бұрын
I am glad you mentioned that it is NOT known if "Mel" is a priest of the HEBREW god (again, BEFORE the Jewish Priesthood was established) OR whether he was a Pagan Caananite god.
@igormarins12274 ай бұрын
Where is Melchizedek in the Quran?
@Duiker364 ай бұрын
About 1500 km northish.
@komaichan994 ай бұрын
Michael
@ChristisKing777774 ай бұрын
Does it really matter? Any book that justifies marrying 9 year olds needs to be discredited.
@Themuslimhanma4 ай бұрын
@@ChristisKing77777so discredit your whole bible read Numbers 31:17-18 in hebrew and read rabbinic interpretation of it then come back 😭 also while you’re at it look up “fallacy of presentism” goodluck mate
@gabrielleangelica19774 ай бұрын
@@ChristisKing77777False. Mohammed did NOT marry a child. Have you read the whole Quran? No. Mary was an underage 🔞 pregnant girl when she married a much older Joseph.
@DJack1164 ай бұрын
Excellent video!
@MiguelDLewis4 ай бұрын
Melchizedek isn't mysterious. You're just looking in the wrong place. Melchizedek was Egyptian. In Egyptian, his name is Merysatet [aka Mentuhotep]. There are statues of him (all three of him). He ruled Tjaru Sile [Jerusalem] which was relocated from where we now refer to as Egypt to where we now refer to as Canaan (Jeremiah 3:18). This assumption that the Torah was originally written in Hebrew is incorrect, since even the bible says it was written by Egyptian Kenites (1 Chronicles 2:55). So, the original Torah was likely written in Ancient Egyptian. The chronology of rulers mentioned in the Book of Genesis and the Book of Kings matches the Karnak Kings List. Melchizedek [Merysatet/Mentuhotep] was the founder of the priesthood of Amen [aka Amun] (Revelation 3:14) and Abraham (Ibre/ Amenemhat) was his prophet. All of these medieval and contemporary artistic representations of him as a European are blinding you to his Afroasiatic origins.
@dianastevenson1313 ай бұрын
Fascinating!
@4tdazАй бұрын
First, he isn't "massively elevated" by Hebrews. It is the brief mention and "eternal" language that make people curious and that curiosity makes for outsized conclusions. All it means in Hebrews is that he is outside of the order of Levi but serves as a priest to Israel. Levi and the priests were serving a law given to a descendant of Abraham so they were maintaining something within the Israelite rule of God. A Levitical priest couldn't be greater than the law because that law defines their role and duty. That is the reason for all the stuff about who tithed who and how Levi would have paid a tithe to Melchizedek through his sire. But Melchizedek was not serving as a priest under any law given. It was just him blessing the entirety of all of Abraham's descendants of promise. In a similar way Jesus did not merely serve as the latest priest under a law given much later than Abraham. Instead, He serves as an eternal priest like the "type" of thing that Melchizedek did. In fact He brings a new covenant where He alone is High Priest. Jesus also was the priest king in the "order" of David who also had those unusual combination of titles. In other words, the passage is can be simply read by what it concludes: Jesus serves in many capacities that make Him the greatest Messenger of the greatest Message, all of which are foreshadowed by events of the past.
@thereturners7564Ай бұрын
Shh. You're gonna expose the fact that this is really just a thinly veiled excuse to minimize / falsify Christ for nearly 20 minutes
@cheeseman4174 ай бұрын
Maybe Malchizadek is really Hermes’s Trismigistus making a cameo appearance !😂
@kagitsune4 ай бұрын
A crossover the likes of which have never been seen! 😂
@joshkeitz29902 ай бұрын
Can we all take a moment to acknowledge how cool it is that a recognized modern political state is roleplaying as the acient mythical state of isreal? There are no limits with LARPing.
@MichaelPagan-c9n4 ай бұрын
*AYLION/עליון (Most High)* is not a name per KTU 1.2 [Ugaritic Tablet 1 (𐎁𐎌𐎍𐎄𐎟𐎊𐎐𐎍𐎂𐎁𐎌𐎕𐎄𐎆𐎍 {"Ba'al of the height «עליון»"})]: It's an epithet for whichever *אל/AL (deity)* that it is applied to. The name is never given in the Torah-all we have is the title. This is verified by Sumerian Tablets, as other deities have been given the title of *Most High,* not just one deity.
@MiguelDLewis4 ай бұрын
Which was the first deity to be given that epithet? Where's its earliest occurrence in the archeological record?
@MichaelPagan-c9n4 ай бұрын
@@MiguelDLewis That's an excellent question that I'm currently trying to figure out. Thus far, I've only seen this name applied to *BAYL/בעל (the name of an evil deity)* and *;אל/AL* however, *אל/AL* is not the name of a deity, it's just a generic title that simply means deity. I'm trying to figure out who this *אל/AL* even is, because it is connected to the deity of the tetragrammaton *,(יהוה)* but *AYLION/עליון* is above even that name per Deuteronomy 32:8-9 and Psalms 82:6. The name has been censored, but I can't reveal what I think it is until I've completed my research. Great question, though.
@MiguelDLewis4 ай бұрын
@@MichaelPagan-c9n Censored by who and what do you think it is? I have my own theories as well...
@MikeDCWeld4 ай бұрын
That definitely makes sense in a system with multiple gods. One would have to be in charge or there would be chaos. And it obviously makes sense for monotheistic beliefs to use it to defend their assertion that their deity trumps all others, i.e. is the "One True God".
@MiguelDLewis4 ай бұрын
@@MichaelPagan-c9n What are the 4-5 conjugations of the name?
@peterparker58584 ай бұрын
Hey, I love your videos. I'm interested in learning more about Moses and the origins of the tales we've come to know him for today.
@finrodfelagund86684 ай бұрын
You presented different interpretations of Melchizedek story: gnostic, rabbinic and dead-see-scrolls-ic. But you didn't present the orthodox Christian understanding of this story... Why? Also, would have been better if the video was longer: you could mention weird descriptions of Melchizedek in Hebrews - how he has no father or mother, no beginning or end - and more.
@mrpocock4 ай бұрын
It would be great if we had some other manuscripts that mention this name in another context. It seems like he had an existing mythos that some writer felt the need to incorporate into the Abraham narrative to elevate Abraham by association.
@Drawn-by-Abundance4 ай бұрын
Joseph Smith Jr. claimed expansive revelation regarding Melchizedek in D&C 107
@RabidLeech14 ай бұрын
I’m definitely gonna believe a guy who lived 4,000 years after Melchizedek and thought that the Israelites were in North America.
@Neenerella3334 ай бұрын
@RabidLeech1 Drawn's comment is a declarative statement. We can assume belief or not. (I personally don't) On its presented face, this episode of Religion for Breakfast shows just how often discrepancies, reiteration, multiple translation changes...I could go on...shaped a piece of cultural literature that is purported to be, ahem, written in stone.
@sharpienate4 ай бұрын
@@Neenerella333While I agree with you generally, in this specific case we can safely assume Drawn's beliefs in mormonism based on their curated YT playlists. They are very clearly an amateur apologist for the faith. So their comment about Joseph Smith and Melchizedek is a subtle evangelical plug given with a scholarly veneer.
@myxos4 ай бұрын
D&C is made up by fake prophets
@WooperSlim4 ай бұрын
Really only a couple verses in Doctrine and Covenants 107 are about Melchizedek. Instead look in JST Genesis 14:25-40 for this expensive revelation, which is what Joseph Smith added to the end of Genesis 14.
@OphiumsCopiumDen4 ай бұрын
A lot of character come out of no where but this guy made me do a wtf. This is one crazy story book.
@VictorianEra.4 ай бұрын
i do hope more people come to believe in God and Christ.