Biggest AI Breakthrough Happened Today (Sora)

[@invader_jim2837]

Can't wait to hear all the politicians say "that wasn't me, it was AI"

[@SaraphDarklaw]

The crooked ones have been saying that for the past year.

[@mad-zr8wy]

Canadian parliament applauding a nazi.

[@realtyrannosaurusallen]

This is literally going to happen

[@LEGENDGAMES-SD]

It's going to be dumpster fire

[@Miranox2]

The are already solutions that we simply need to implement, such as digital signatures for images and video.

[@LivingFire_BurningFlame]

New legal defence; "Sir we have you on camera. You're going to jail." "That's not me, must be Sora or sum."

[@Revenant-oq9ts]

Metadata checks will be standard soon.

[@MrNoBodyXD12]

yeah they will put you on jail and create an android that looks like you acts like you just take all them blame or the crime that robot created and all of the blame will also be put on your family you children parent will take all the blame the android does on you behalf

[@thesocialmediagame]

@@Revenant-oq9ts Wait... they aren't? I'm pretty sure they have been standard for quite a while now

[@Revenant-oq9ts]

@@thesocialmediagame In some circles. Not all circles. In the art community, it's standard. Photography, digital images, etc. Office presentations and a huge bulk of web development, people are happy to cut corners and skimp checks.

[@mlordwhiteslayerfromf.u.g]

​@@Revenant-oq9tsyou can spoof Metadata, it's not all that difficult.

[@JustGaming117]

An entire GENERATION is going to be born, live and die entirely within Plato's Gooncave

[@jesse3086]

And we get to have a taste of that glory!

[@djvaampyre]

I was just looking at the birth rates. You might want to revise that prediction.

[@Taunteur]

What do you mean by that? Pls explain I'm low IQ

[@charlesfarrant6819]

@@Taunteur Plato's cave is an analogy for people deing entertained by objects generated to appease the interests of a majority group of people whilst others seek more meaningful or complex things by trying to leave the cave, and authority may or may not try to control them from doing so with traps also. It's been a while since i looked at it but this is what i recall, and it's difficult to frame how exactly the world outside that system of charades is more valuable than things within the language structure of existing, well defined conceptions but i think it speaks to the hunger for people to encounter the unknown for any of the reasons they might be interested and whatever they might be seeking to express their wants to create change or test their hypotheses in the hope of developing themselves and rectifying the problems for whom they care about given how their people are limited by these "puppeteers" like propagandists, so that they can flourish. Say people have good ideas that are just not recieved so that they can be actuated or get the help they need because the system isn't interested, or they aren't able to explore or create better circumstances in which to live at all

[@charlesfarrant6819]

if anyone can help me more succinctly state the desire for people to express genuine emotion and reasoning for things to change, pls help, im sure there's a word for it. But yeah this problem requires definition of the barriers to reasoning as they exist aswell in addition to the freedom to think and validate themselves (even with appropriate counter arguments)

[@berlols]

Turns out this whole video was Sora creating asmongold reacting to Sora

[@smileybones9172]

Turns out this comment was created by Sora watching a video of Sora creating asmongold reacting to Sora.

[@formodius]

I’m not white but I’m seriously considering Un-aliving myself man

[@iHeartAMP]

@@formodius if you really are then... Evolution is doing what it does best. Only the strongest will survive. By the way Why does she look like an old sheng-nu?

[@MilaanTornbergroeo]

AI still has no sense for design, it is still random generic boring and just not good, beacuse there is no real intelligence behind the creations

[@Belorious]

Is this the Matrix timeline?

[@JW86100]

Prompts in a few years "Create a 120 minute long film, high fantasy, greek tragedy, pantheon cosmology, main character falls to inner demons but later has redemption arc. 25% trope density. 15% comedy. 30% action. 30% drama."

[@BigAssPelican]

Thats scary

[@xXblackgaarangelXx]

​@@BigAssPelican or exciting. Imagine sending your own prompt about what you'd like to watch during dinner and having it generated on the spot. Just for you, exactly the way you like it.

[@BigAssPelican]

@@xXblackgaarangelXx i wouldnt want that. There wouldnt be any life in the movie

[@uekvowzkaebbzuvrgipqxhemmwbhe]

That would be great, instead of having to watch movies made for the majority of people you could just watch a movie that’s perfectly made for you and that you alone would enjoy more than any other person

[@weylinstoeppelmann9858]

@@BigAssPelican Are you sure? You could define a style of movie direction and it may be more full of "life" than anyone could have imagined. It's difficult to even define that attribute as it's very complex and abstract, but it's something that AI can learn because it doesn't work with static variables and rigid definitions, it's a bewilderingly complex web of associations that it will learn from being trained on movies and stories, it will pick up on the do's and don'ts, and it will be able to venture into styles that have never been done before.

[@Mewseeker]

Time to push the A.I. to its limits : "Asmongold streaming in his clean room."

[@yg_euro]

The most intelligent AI in existence ain't able to do this

[@MrSmokingMachine]

yet

[@blakkwaltz]

Holy crud. Are trying to make the Ai hate us? XD

[@onederb71nln83]

While eating a salad

[@JohnDoe-on6ru]

Even AI can't do that

[@Alexandr.A.P.]

Imagine the AI generation quality in a year from now 💀

[@Johansen1000]

It's gonna be so cool when everyone has access to it like 5 years from now, basically turning anyone into a movie studio or game publisher. Skill requirement for this be a really good writer of stories.

[@Katatonya]

@@Johansen1000I think it's much less than 5 years till it's public, I'm even thinking months

[@Johansen1000]

@@Katatonya I'm really completely ignorant, like can you just download the software and slap a million pictures in a folder and run it on a laptop offline, or do you need like an IBM supercomputer that need 13 mega watts to run, no clue.

[@Gajsu1]

Decade from now ☠☠☠☠☠☠

[@RandomQuestNPC]

@@Johansen1000 No need to be a good writer, it'll also be handled by AI.

[@normalcommenter8595]

12:20 skilled vs unskilled has nothing to do with actual ability, its about replaceability. You can be skilled as fuck at flipping burgers, but its unskilled labor in the sense that anyone could do that in 5 minutes of training, currently a doctor cannot be replaced without several years of training at minimum, if not a decade. If AI somehow replaces doctors then it'll become unskilled labor due to how easily replaceable it'll become.

[@rainniu]

100%. Unskilled laborers can move onto something else quickly. You can’t ramp up on a new skill quickly, especially when it’s a skill that requires considerable time and money to learn.

[@smokedbeefandcheese4144]

I feel like it makes more sense to think about skills in terms of the floor and the ceiling. AI is just going to make it to where people with less skills can do more things. It effectively increases the floor of the unskilled individual. But many of the things it can do can already be done by people who are experts in their field with pretty much relative ease. So it doesn’t raise the skill ceiling.

[@im.meghan]

A lot of doctors use WebMD on top of their practice lol and surgeons have been using robots since like a decade...

[@cheekybreeky3775]

@@MFillmore it's also way easier to pin the blame on the individual doctor who will take all the blame if they make a mistake rather than the company that made the robot or AI that makes the big mistake.

[@jacobw3652]

@@MFillmore Human doctors make millions of mistakes each and every year.

[@Baleur]

Another thing people dont understand is, this isnt just as simple as "predict the next word" (for GPT4) or "predict the next pixel / image". If you listen to interviews with the actual brains behind all the major AI developments, when they get comfy in the interview, they open up bigtime and literally say that, hey we have no clue how or why this works, we cant analyze the weights and balances in the neural network to see what pattern represents how an apple looks, becuase it's all just random numbers to us. It learnt by itself. But what they also explain, is that its no longer this outdated theory of "it just predicts the next word", because they can create fully original new works of writing or art. It's not just deriving from the training set and trying to jigsaw puzzle things together. I WAS like that two years ago, but not today. They say that it's way more than that, for some poems and stories that the AI were writing, required an actual understanding and internal simulation of human psychology and behavioral prediction, otherwise it wouldnt know what the right next sentence would be. Without understanding how humans react or behave, you cant write a story about humans. "But it would learn how humans react by reading how humans react in the source material". Yeah, exactly. Thats how we learn how to behave in society too, compared to someone born with wolves in the forest. Yet you dont argue that we are automatons just going by source material puzzle-matching. The ai models we have today, are literally training by learning an internal model of the world. Internal to the ai neural network, or "brain" itself. Just as we form an internal representation and model of the world (that's why you can think about things and predict outcomes with cause and effect, becuase your brain has a sufficently advanced model of how the world works). That's why you can dream and imagine images when you close your eyes. If you DONT have any internal simulation or model of the world, you wouldnt be able to imagine or dream anything what so ever. It's the same with images. It has to self-learn a whole theory about light refraction and scatter, to be able to properly generate reflections and objects behind glass. It also has to self-learn when people smile and why they smile, how all the thousand different subcategories of smiles apply to each situation. How a slight hint of doubt in someones eyes might be a clue to something being off in the situation. How suspicion works. This does NOT mean the models are self-aware or sentient. Models do not have to be self-aware or sentient what so ever, to self-learn all these concepts and become truly superintelligent. An ant-hive can be truly stunning in its intelligence to navigate its environment and conduct actual war campaign strategies. But the queen itself isnt very intelligent, and each ant isnt intelligent at all. it's the collective that demonstrates a higher emerging intelligence. It's similar with AI. Each neuron is dead, just a data node storing a single weight value between 0.0000 and 1.0000 But collectively they represent knowledge that we call intelligent.

[@shoazdon7000]

You’ve perfectly described it. The most terrifying this is they are creating something that they don’t even fully understand themselves how it works.

[@alexanderacosta8111]

Yeah no, this needs to stop development asap and be an outright ban.

[@Yourhighnessnona]

I understood like 70% of what you’re saying but it scares me 😢

[@randfall]

@@Yourhighnessnona The short of it is.. AI learns much like a human learns. Human's 'create' things based off of what they've seen and what they've experienced and learned over time. Imagine if a human was born that could not feel, could not hear, could not smell, could not see, and could not taste. A human that lacked all of the five senses. That human would have no way to experience anything. That human could never learn language, it would never learn to read, it could never navigate the world, it could never be taught anything because it lacks every sense that is necessary to "experience" life. But because humans are able to experience things (feel/hear/see/taste/smell), we're able to create art - and all of it is derived from those experiences.

[@uekvowzkaebbzuvrgipqxhemmwbhe]

@@alexanderacosta8111shut up caveman, let humanity finally progress

[@atomicskull6405]

The anime industry is experimenting with using AI to replace in betweeners. Basically they'll only have keyframers and let the AI generate the frames in between the human drawn keyframes. In betweening is like 90% of production cost.

[@keeparguing611]

damn that's wild if true

[@halo3isawsome321]

Inbetweens are the worst part, if they can streamline animation, it will be nuts

[@BinaryDood]

@@halo3isawsome321only if they get compensated somehow.

[@LetsPlayAceCraft]

Why?@@BinaryDood

[@joshjo9405]

It'll probably look hella goofy tho

[@golik133]

VR with this AI is gonna wild, imagine reading novels chatper to chapter through this 'text to video' tool

[@PigeonCrash]

That is such an amazing idea for applying this tech.

[@golik133]

@@PigeonCrash Facebook/meta is gona milk it or Microsoft is gonna introduce this with their VR headset

[@NneonNTJ]

I wouldn't be too surprised that in the near future you could put an entire book into an AI tool and make it into a fully fledged movie.

[@shefalichow7917]

I'd rather not support something that will lead to the decline of my society, even if it means I won't get some momentary satisfaction from a petty dopamine rush. I'm appalled at Asmon's take on this, but I guess I shouldn't be surprised, considering how lacking he is, generally, in the intellect department.

[@PigeonCrash]

@@shefalichow7917 Grandiose statement about how bad something is, provides no points to back it up and presents it as self evident as if to cement yourself as being smart. Personal attack towards Asmon, degrading his intellect out of an emotional response by you because he doesn't subscribe to the same group-think as you. And you call someone else out for "lacking intellect". Ok. That totally makes me view you as having an intellectual stance to trust on this matter. Yep.

[@igorlukyan206]

We’re coming full circle where physical film, fine art paintings, handwriting, and vinyl music are gonna become popular again

[@NewtrendsMe]

A modern-day Italian/Harlem Renaissance, perhaps?

[@crycrcfyhf8862]

Or more likely there going to be so much incredible content out there no one will ever care or even think about those things ever again

[@SawdEndymon]

@@crycrcfyhf8862do you know what the average person will make? Probably .1% will be “incredible”

[@romofin]

@@SawdEndymon Even .01% of average people making incredible things is already an infinite improvement on what we have now. There are so many creative people out there who haven't even tried to make something because of time/budget constraints. We're absolutely gonna see an explosion of new and interesting things.

[@LazyDev27]

@@crycrcfyhf8862 Ai doesnt understand or empathize with the human experience like a human artist can. Plus, they require datasets of art created by humans to even create anything.

[@5hAun1E]

One step closer to Asmons dream of having an AI stream for him

[@vinny_n_p]

Unless he was already doing it and we never noticed...

[@thesocialmediagame]

Let's all be real here, Asmon is one of the few people that will never let AI stream for him and betray his fanbase.... Since he doesn't like to do anything else anyways

[@RenderingUser]

so basically, vedal?

[@Drakkira]

Just the stream saying it's AI and not real is enough to make half his live audience leave and the rest drift away with time.

[@goratron1]

This would never work as people don't understand the reason why people subscribe to a streamer, it's the parasocial relationship.

[@kerotomas1]

We still have 53 years until Cyberpunk 2077 so everyone buckle up.

[@mechwarrior13]

Ever heard of the Matrix?

[@simonrockstream]

Doesnt seem so unrealistic anymore now does it.

[@whynow7035]

Damn ur right, and at the rate we’re going i honestly don’t think it’s too far fetched

[@FadeintotheShadows]

I'll be 83 years old by then. RIP.

[@NiNjAcAt5677]

This whole AI thing isn't going anywhere whether people like it or not, it's going to advance and it's definitely going to remove a lot of jobs. My only concern with this is that the job removal aspect would happen way faster and to a much wider group of people than any other technological advancements we had in the past that ended up removing jobs. Horse grooms slowly disappeared due to cars, even the more recent self checkouts didn't immediately get rid of all cashiers. With AI advancing in so many areas this fast it wouldn't just make a couple people jobless it would shake up entire industries and affect a huge portion of a the labor market.

[@DextraVisual]

I literally had a commission to create a flythrough of a gold rush town in Australia. It has been put on hold after the Sora release video and I know why. The impact has started already.

[@debbie22-]

How is a corporation suppose to make profit if we’re all broke and jobless? 🤨 the robots buying 😂

[@fluffywhitebudgie6376]

​@@debbie22- the market adapts and caters to those with the money. You don't see us trying to heavily cater to feeding and housing Africa, do you? We're just next in line. But you're actually right, there will be robots who do the buying but it'll be for job-related tasks like buying from suppliers or requesting services from other businesses.

[@debbie22-]

@@fluffywhitebudgie6376 what does Africa have to do with this? And so what? Are you just gonna sit around and let a robot/ai take your job? That’s why we have unions. Also, One thing about the market, is that the market is built on competition. Walmart isn’t the only super market, McDonald’s isn’t the only fast food restaurant. If target can be brought to brink of downfall over their pride selection, how would a corporation fair against negative publicity and public outcry if they announce that they will be firing of all of their human employees and replacing them with robots (mind you, that being a heavy investment)

[@kapeecoffee]

If companies use ai then we can just take their creations free of consequences

[@Sourman1545]

its gunna get to a point where you have to prove the thing in court is not just an ai generated video, and until the law catches up alot of innocent people will have their lives ruined

[@FallenstarPR-f1w]

Again the problem is not the AI attacking people with fake videos is the one asking for a fake video or making it in the first place The problem is the evil in the us to make evil things to others for a big or small game To explain this scape from tarkov could be an easy game to beat if everyone just worked together and helping each other but that wouldn’t be fun and full of adrenaline so we just go in their and just destroy the other players 😂 while we could all be improving and making the planet a better place everyone is fighting killing and cheating for money land and rare materials to make more money we have what we need to give everyone a safe place with a full stomach and a happy life but that’s not what the evil in us want even little kids find amusing destroying other kids life’s just for a for fun We are the problem not the AI

[@Rudgged]

@@FallenstarPR-f1w”We are the problem, not AI” Dude we made AI, it is a problem. And so are we. Just like any human made thing, there are human errors and failures

[@nERVEcenter117]

There is a standard for the admissibility of evidence in courts. The court system will very quickly learn to mistrust potential sources of AI fakery. We'll be honing our ability to correctly dig towards the truth, not hurting it.

[@wishfull3nigma]

​@@Rudgged that still makes people the actual problem. You didn't help your case at all.

[@grindsauce3017]

Forget courts, I could just easily blackmail my wife and kids and not let them use any devices.

[@arthur6856]

5:48 man this is actually crazy to me, most CGI footages of prehistoric animals never manage to make them look "real" and you can always tell if it is just a 3d object, the AI did a quite decent job trying to capture the feeling of an actual living being on screen.

[@tjoy8082]

And it´s Gen 1

[@ivoryowl]

To be fair mammoths are probably the easiest to emulate because they can just take an elephant as a base and work from there.

[@shoazdon7000]

@@ivoryowlthis is true

[@ppman698]

@@ivoryowlyup, just about to say that

[@ClockworkGearhead]

Keep in mind this is demonstrative. They definitely picked the best.

[@zerogrey3798]

While people have been using photoshop for years to alter still pictures. My daughter used and AI to alter her law school graduation photo to insert her twin sister, mother and littler brother into them. They died in 2001. The result was so good that it was mind boggling. She uploaded the grad photo, then she showed me the exact commands she put into the prompt with the second picture which was "please insert my dead family into my graduation photo" , the AI did it in 2 minutes and I was just thoroughly astonished. It was so well made with no funkiness at all that it was painful to look at. Nobody that's seen it that knows our history has been able to tell and the professionals that worked at her lawfirm that were employed specifically to detect fraud could tell either. These people got paid tons to detect fraudulent photos and forgeries and they couldn't tell.

[@glowiedetector]

that is beautiful and extremely uncanny at the same time

[@gantech7788]

Asmons take about people being more aware of BS in life is what everyone was saying in the 90's with the internet. We are fucked as a species.

[@gadman85]

Yep. We all need to realize the future is an AI charged version of the movie Idiocracy.

[@PBRatLord]

IMO it'll just create another layer of ignorance that people will use as a shield to avoid confronting difficult information, just like how social media has trained people to think discussions are a matter of winning and losing as opposed to an exchange of information.

[@awitness4jehovah]

100% agree. I know too many people who still believe in faith healing or traditional "medicine" or are otherwise superstitious. And people shouldn't just think "well, they'll weed themselves out". After 1 or 2 really great deep fakes riles up every day people into thinking there's a war or some other disaster and those people buy it and blow up a few things (figuratively or literally), the last match could truly be lit for the rest of us.

[@brokenrecord1323]

Asmon is making sure that Roko’s Basilisk spares him. when the day comes that first super AI becomes sentient and it parses through this world’s history, it will see that Asmon advocated for AI superiority

[@AsAboveISoBelow]

A couple of years ago I thought the Basilisk wouldn't spare me, but for how much I've loved what's been done with AI... I think I'd be okay now.

[@Luc3ntiX]

I'd also prefer an AI controlled plane than a human pilot

[@MilaanTornbergroeo]

AI still has no sense for design, it is still random generic boring and just not good, beacuse there is no real intelligence behind the creations

[@votecthulhu9378]

You just infected the comment section with the basilisk. good job, you have doomed us

[@calimantis]

@@votecthulhu9378 Let's be real, those of us who knew were already doomed from the start lol

[@missdeadite9696]

So what I'm seeing is multiple billion dollar companies will probably fire their staff and start pumping out more garbage even faster than ever before. You didn't like The Marvels? Well get ready for 20 movies just like it. Budget: $50 million. $49999999 of it into advertising and an extra dollar to the intern for not screwing up the prompt.

[@csk3578]

Good for them. There will be 20x of the movie you like getting pumped out too.

[@romofin]

But you'll also have smaller companies/individuals with actual passion have the same tech in their hands. It will all balance out and I don't see why we wouldn't just have a massive jump in quality for media/entertainment across the board. Just imagine how much creativity has been stifled because of limits to budget and time, or because experimentation has become seen as 'too risky' by these same billion dollar companies. You don't think they'll at least try to innovate with tech that solves so many of their holdups? Will these companies even need to exist when the average person will have the same tech in their hands?

[@Gaze73]

They still need an AI to make sound matching those movies.

[@romofin]

@@Gaze73 If they can make full movies with AI, I don't see why sound would be an issue.

[@Gaze73]

@@romofin Because there is no AI that can create sound based on a video. So without AI you'd have to manually create sound for every scene of a 2 hour movie.

[@STDRACO777]

This is going to hit as hard as the internet.

[@Olav3D]

Already has with GPT imo

[@RomGomLP]

Im very glad I wasnt in school nowadays with chatGPT. Knowing me, I would not do a single task myself and let everything be handled by chatgpt lmao. Id be a dumb ass mfer at the end of it all@@Olav3D

[@MOo8996cz]

More like, the nuclear bomb

[@SchrodingersLife]

I think it's going to hit harder than the internet as we aware that we don't really know the limits of AI capabilities

[@Dannnneh]

Not even close. That would be something like true AGI singularity, or nanotechnology, or fusion power.

[@Harrry-B]

"I've been having these weird thoughts lately. Like, is any of this for real or not?" ~ Sora

[@ubersky7029]

Best comment of the ENTIRE YEAR THUS FAR

[@yaboy5228]

*sick guitar riff into one of the best opening cinematics the video game industry has ever produced* Guess I'm replaying this game now :^)

[@Graphaeli]

holy W

[@NeverTheLess-s5t]

BRO... No way they cooked this... if they did.. Holy shit I respect it

[@Baleur]

The spooky thing about these ai image / video gens is that, the things they get twisted and distorted, are very similar to what we humans sometimes see in our dreams, as things, faces, humans, architecture, is twisted and distorted when we dream...

[@TheRoyalSkies]

Good stuff, as an indie dev, I'm just excited to see what small groups of friends will be able to create things that used to only be possible with AAA companies!!

[@plfaproductions]

If everyone can make a game at home with a single phrase, why would any developer be needed? You will join everyone else on the entertainment industry very soon, 3-4 years buddy, that's all it will take to replace you

[@ICELAG3]

Remember when the robots where going to take our jobs and we where all going to be artists and painters.

[@The_Questionaut]

I'm surprised anyone thought that considering AI would just replace all the options 😂

[@GermaphobeMusic]

If you're implying that robots didn't end up taking our jobs, what makes you think the same won't apply to art?

[@badrequest5596]

right now we're all about to become AI technicians and tech support. for a few more years at least

[@P1111-e4o]

@@GermaphobeMusicreading comprehension isn’t your forte eh?

[@GermaphobeMusic]

@@P1111-e4o How so? Robots automated lots of factory jobs, yet factory jobs still exist. CGI automated things like practical VFX artists and background extras, yet we still have filmmakers. In the same vein, humans will always be part of the animation process. AI generation is quickly improving, but there are clear limitations that necessitate people to fill in the gaps.

[@keenshibe7529]

11:10 Actually false. Customer service helplines, cashiers and assembly line workers have jobs removed due to automation. Companies simply gravitate towards what is more cost effective. Artists have all the right to be unhappy about GenAI, as long as the AI governance is not robust enough. There are no strict enough laws to prevent what datasets the AI models are trained from. If there are no more artists producing new data to train the model, reintroducing generated outputs as inputs into the model will cause the quality to deteriorate. This creates a harnful cycle which artists create new creative work just for it to improve the models which take their work. It is really hard to pinpoint which data the output is taken from and when humans outright copy from another persons work its copyright? So as long as you copy small things from multiple artists to the point its hard to determine, its no longer copyright? There is a difference between inspiration and copy. And AI has no concept of inspiration, it simply generate outputs based on inputs (copy). The growth of AI is so rapid that AI goverance is struggling to catch up and it is a bad thing. Artists are already affected and losing jobs and opportunities. You see companies such as Square Enix developing FoamStars using Midjourney for its art. This removes opportunities for artists to get paid. Artists are a different breed from cashiers or assembly line workers. Those jobs go through a transformation into another job where they manage the self checkout machines, operate the assembly lines through a booth, etc. Artists simply get their preceived value taken away from AI. Clients and customers mostly just want something which is cheaper and maybe slightly less quality and they get it immediately.

[@SuuugaAgus]

Its like non artist people can not see this.

[@dimitriykoch]

More people lose job -> less demand for goods -> less marketing budgets -> less payments on youtube per watch - only AI wins here :)

[@TheHollowBlade]

Of course, forget youtube. I 1000% guarantee you big execs from companies like walmart, mcdonalds, starbucks are seeing AI and how robotics are advancing and their only thought is, how can we use this to not employ or pay anyone and keep all the money and profits for ourselves. While they drool at the thought of more profits and not having to pay some peasant to do the work. Once one company sets it up and others see the margins go flying up, every big corp will be running to also make the same margins. The same way you see game devs copy a game that blows up with profits. Battle royals blew up and suddenly within a year every company was releasing some terrible BR to try and cash in to the hype. AI in the long run imo will only benefit the ultra rich who will use it to become even more ultra rich and no normal person will have a job.

[@xS3R4]

Except that fewer people working ≠ Less resources produced, therefore, there is no less budget. Human labor is not inherent to work

[@dimitriykoch]

@@xS3R4 if i have 100 customers and they purchase 100$ each = 10000$ revenue. I spend 2% on internet marketing and it is 200$. But if i have only 50 customers. My youtube budget is just 100$ regardless that i fired 50% staff. Which next month cuased more sales drop. Etc... So domino pushed already...

[@siema14123]

a film making company doesnt have to pay people -> bigger budget -> better product who loses? people who lost their jobs. who wins? everybody else now and everybody who is going to be born after this fact, so infinite amount of people

[@dimitriykoch]

@@siema14123 ai going to replace many different jobs... millions of designers, accountants, analysts, programmers...

[@icedanilzation]

My prediction is that as AI becomes the staple means of production, not just for video and images, but music, singing too; we will see a rise in value for human creations as their production begins to decrease; this could take a few generations. We will see human-restaurants, human-art, human-services, etc. The majority will use ai for their daily purposes, but every now and then, human connection will be desired, and of course, will come with a higher price tag. Interesting future we're headed for.

[@saswitchcraft7881]

How do you prove that you didn't use AI to make your art or write your story?

[@pandajacket1598]

Or, you just have AI pretend to be human, problem solved. I think we may be looking at the inevitable replacement of our species.

[@laser__unicorn]

The Earth's magnetic poles will shift and fck everything up before this future ever comes.

[@BinaryDood]

I'm sorry. But history proves the opposite. If 99.9999999% of everything is lies, you can't expect the general public to figure out the truth. They will grow and live in such an environment and be defined by it. Attempting to discer realityn in an LLM based web is like finding a needle in a haystack, when people's attention spans become shorter and their education ever more meaningless face to the markets that should provide them subsistence in trade for their skills and work (but there shall be no such market anymore).

[@wowandrss]

Idk, it will have its place but the thing with art is that the human component and emotion is really important. AI created art has no soul compared to some guy painting it, we will always value art by humans and not A.I, there's such a disconnect there. It'll be used to streamline shitty and time consuming practices but it'll never have inherent value, for us at least.

[@varna2310]

AI is cool and all, but what kills it completely is the fact that is 100% handled by private corporations who dictate what is and isnt allowed to be said or shown by the AI. For example A good chunk of good movies wouldnt even exist if they were instead generated via AI, as it would consider the themes, voice lines or scenes to be problematic, violent or insensitive in some obscure way. What scares me the most is that we as consumers will get these watered down version with extreme guard rails and guidelines of what can and cant be said. While governments and whomever has deep enough pockets will be able to use them to actually receive valuable data from it, without any censorship or railing.

[@misledfortune]

I hadn't thought about AI in this way. That's a super good point. What a potential nightmare.

[@neetfreek9921]

I mean that’s why people push for open source ai. Idk if the video generators have open source alternatives but the llm’s definitely do.

[@Ranchor489]

This is why you must always push for open source, let none control it.

[@therustedmonkie4787]

Not really. I have stable diffusion on my own computer using my RTX card to create AI images. No outside involvement. People will be able to get a hold of this technology and build it in house. Corporations will always be first because it's cheaper, but as time goes on private ownership gets easier.

[@DavidLyles]

Too many people are making ai right now. It would be nearly impossible for them to stop you from creating your own or using one you found on the internet. Hacking ai is also going crazy right now.

[@readifdumb]

Movies are over, directors are out, CGI artist are out, models don't exist, actors lose their jobs. This isn't just artist, writers, and musicians that this is affecting currently. This is the whole entertainment industry. Soon it will be GPs, lawyers, accountants, and anyone that could easily be replaced by AI. Imagine a lawyer that knows every bit of law for a country or state, front to back, with perfect recall of every line of text, as well as every case that's ever been open to the public. You can't beat that. As soon as we can merge this with robots, we lose every job. No job is safe.

[@dumcatte1180]

Good.

[@rwps3677]

Learn to code

[@jarate8076]

@@dumcatte1180 >hate working >hate doing anything really >get an AI that works for you >writers block so get an AI that writes for you >burnout so get an AI That draws for you >need to comprehend something, so get an AI that thinks for you >??? >do nothing and die >PROFIT???

[@eugeneflores6153]

Womp womp

[@eugeneflores6153]

Womp womp

[@Untolddead]

I think the biggest issue isn't job loss but the fact that our society keeps getting more depressed, sad, and broken as things become more convenient. We are becoming like the mouse utopia experiment.

[@dembi2770]

Meh, wouldn't say it is completely due to convenience when over half of americans lice paycheck to paycheck.

[@thumpertron]

Sounds like you could do with some time away from the internet, big doomer energy, go explore the real world, touch grass.

[@Untolddead]

@@dembi2770 People in the US live paycheck to paycheck no matter how much money they make. Also there are plenty of poor people through out history who didn't have the kind of depression we have today.

[@Untolddead]

@@thumpertron Thank you for your feedback. I hope you have a wonderful day.

[@iHeartAMP]

Wall-e

[@comancostin4623]

It's not the end but you can see it from here.

[@AnyOtherNamePlease]

Classic Deus Ex: Human Revolution quote: It's not the end of the world... but you can see it from here.

[@JackCrossSama]

Old men will rule the world!

[@oo0OAO0oo]

Let's talk in the future again. Now it's relaxed and fun, chilling at the couch. ​It isn't easy to do that anymore when hell breaks loose.@silentgamer7550

[@vanivari359]

What Azmo might not realize is, that once the jobs of artists and programmers and office workers are gone, the whole system crashes. Who has money to buy fast food, who pays for furniture or goes into shows and movies and plays games or donates to streamers or pays netflix? High income jobs contribute the most taxes. I know how to program and train AI, so i should be safe for quit some time, but there is a really big chance that this is the beginning of a dystopian hellscape. And in that hellscape, Azmo is not safe either because everything we have requires that the system itself remains stable. The alternative is that politicians get their sh*t together and find a solution. so...

[@brianc620]

@@vanivari359 Nah, you ain't safe at all. Companies are going to use AI to develop, program and train AI as soon as they can. Some are already doing it.

[@fylondpettyloaf2972]

I really wish they would bring the "unskilled labor" back to the assembly lines. As a Millwright who has to work on all the automation, I miss when we had people who knew what was going on. A lot of those "unskilled laborers" were in fact quite skilled in one or two things and it made a hell of a difference.

[@dripapproved1582]

There’s a reason so many people believe that the pyramids couldn’t have been built by us and it’s for this exact reason. We forget, eventually we will go full 40k and pray to machine spirits while never turning off our technology in fear it won’t start again.

[@shoazdon7000]

They only called it unskilled to demean people.

[@emd9755]

Because there's a big difference in just being replaced by electronics/machinery in a cashier/warehouse jobs, those are the types of jobs that anybody can just learn in a day or two....Artists reacts like this because imagine you doing art your whole life, just to get the best quality possible for the industry standards and being replaced by AI someday... It's not like they get good that easily it's years of progression wasted. Blood, sweat, sleepless nights, and tears.

[@Ninjacat9000Ilovebigfloppa]

Yes, but these warehouse workers were usually not qualified for other jobs, they probably were in that job for decades and it got taken over by machinery. Its not like they could find easy employment after either, its the same thing as the dilemma now.

[@plfaproductions]

​@@Ninjacat9000Ilovebigfloppano, they were there for short term, art carriers were supposed to be a whole life thing, a cashier can get a degree meanwhile a master artist is still paying his, this time it's worse, it's like a doctor or an engineer getting replaced, it's a complete essential cog on society machine simply disappearing and leaving their parts rusting on poverty

[@AntonNidhoggr]

I think the biggest problem is that the warehouse workers still exist, people still work in mines and there are lots of farmers working hard especially in third world countries. People also still die on battlefield. And instead of that we basically replaced all the actually fun jobs with AI. “So, little Billy, you wanna become an artist or a musician? Sorry but they are obsolete. This way, Billy, the mine is waiting 😅

[@romofin]

@@AntonNidhoggr You're just getting ahead of yourself. No one knows the full implications of this tech yet. I don't see why all human entertainment would just become obsolete, people will always crave the human element of art.

[@demonz9065]

lmao im sorry do you think artists are the first highly skilled occupation lost to technology? how many career long jobs do you think there are that dont exist anymore because new technology made them obselete? seen any local cobblers lately? how's the town blacksmith doing?

[@AwesomeBlackDude]

One thing I noticed is that there is no resolution treaty among all countries, stating that AI Bots cannot be used to harm humans. Ensuring this becomes the main prime objective for Skynet to exist.

[@kolliwanne964]

Dude we are literally using them to guide explosive drones. What do you expect?

[@__BlacklotuS__]

they already have killer robots look it up

[@emm6101]

I agree but people will abuse ai and it will have blowback soon or very soon.

[@AwesomeBlackDude]

​@@kolliwanne964 I'm almost certain we are talking about two different things here. I'm referring to advanced human-like characteristic designs, especially in the context of walking and talking bots with a Hal 9-like type of brain in technology. (I'm referring to capabilities of learning human progressive). Again these bots can emulate human actions and represent a generation capable of performing tasks distinct from any point and click drone weapons.

[@Ricardo-pb7kc]

search: "Autonomous killer drones set to be used by Turkey in Syria". Also a few years ago an Ally of turkey already used a full AI drone to kill people too. I will share something I heard from an USA col, something like: "You are in a war and you know the AI will give huge advantage to win the war and you also know that the enemy also can use AI against you, you will not use AI ???" If I was going to get destroyed in a war I am going to use the most advanced AI that I can and win the war, later I deal with the consequences, if any.

[@Auxius.]

Now we need an AI trained to recognize AI work and all is solved.

[@wynn5540]

lmfao cybersecurity would beg to differ

[@plfaproductions]

We already have, and it cannot discern as well, it's literally impossible

[@Sarzuen]

Gonna have to. Ai has to fight ai. Like ballistic armor to block a gun's bullet.

[@Nora-1114-Sdyki]

Hive Moderation

[@uekvowzkaebbzuvrgipqxhemmwbhe]

And then devs will use that AI to train their own AI models to the point it’s impossible to tell what is AI and what isn’t

[@kolliwanne964]

Something overshadowed: Google also released data on their multi modal retrieval model. That shit was able to get precise info out of 10 MILLION token. Or even out of a 3h long VIDEO. Absolutely insane

[@Not4-c6t]

Yep! Just waiting for everyone to realize they missing out on the new 2TB AI Google plan (free for 2months right now)

[@theteacher010]

Is it available for us already?

[@kolliwanne964]

@@theteacher010 No, it is first tested anf given out to select groups/companies and whatever. Will come for public a bit later.

[@malcolmliang]

Now some guy with a great movie plot can compete with Hollywood.

[@JackCrossSama]

At zero cost, and you add videos games to the mix, I don't think anyone is going to be making any money.

[@wizzscout959]

​@@JackCrossSamaIdk it everyone could do this then yeah... Where's the profit?

[@youcallmejr4683]

Not yet.

[@Beanskiiii]

@@JackCrossSamamakes no sense

[@aoc7437]

​@@JackCrossSamanot a zero cost you will need a powerful pc or pay online to rendering your movie

[@Real_MisterSir]

Main reason so many people speak up about this when it comes to artistic/creative fields of work, is because those fields traditionally have always been built on the basis of people working out of passion and pursuing the career for the ability to create, rather than just the ability to make money. They're also often underpaid relative to how personally invested they are in their reasoning for doing the work they do. It's also why it's oftentimes frowned upon by many, to criticize game devs, while it's totally morally fine to criticize executives and leadership. Why? Because to most people, it appears like one group is there out of passion and "goodwill", while the other is there for pure financial and cynical reasons. It's always morally easier to cope with replacements based on cynicism, than passion. But that's just to explain it. I'm a designer myself, and while traditional pencil pusher creative jobs are at risk, I don't see how that's a bad thing. Mediocrity has been the name of the game for a while, because most people frankly get into this industry but don't contribute much in terms of personal flavor anymore. In my opinion, truly creative industries live and die based on what some person's niche ideas could flourish into - but over the past decades everything "creative" has been so industrialized and normalized and non-risk incentivized that nothing really gets to be niche anymore. It's just another bunch of jobs that frankly could be done by anyone with an internship-period worth of training. Color theory isn't that hard. Learning 3D software is a matter of putting in the time and effort, not because you have something intrinsic in you that allows you to uniquely do this job. You just had the desire to pursue it, but not much more beyond that. I think people who still burn with a passion for creation, will find niches where they can cater even more through their personal approach to design and creative work -with new tools and less direct competition. When automation goes up, truly niche and premium also always go up. And I think the people who never truly had the drive to do more than what you could expect from an average person in these fields, will very soon figure out what supply and demand dynamics truly mean in a changing industry. Shits gonna be super tough for some, and a golden ticket for others. Mindset is the determining factor.

[@arktv213]

People will change and adapt otherwise they will die. Even if it's like this we shouldn't diminish people's work and time spent to deliver these products. Artists nowadays are very skillful with hours of practice behind their backs but AI now is gonna force a lot of passionate people to quit and pursue more traditional jobs. Only really outstanding people will prevail in the industry but when a new technology appears we lose some freedom, now we can't choose to survive doing what we love, tomorrow what other freedom we will lose in the name of comfort and security? This was never about achieving better quality, this was never about producing more quantity but about preserving our heart, our soul and our capacity to choose to survive doing what we love. Now in the future we must be gray, sad and working like robots as corporations always want us to be in the first place while we pretend to be happy with an infinite amount of automatically generated entertainment that only remind us that we are replaceable, predictable, deeply depressed and resentful of society for robbing us our creative spirit.

[@BinaryDood]

can the public discern the truth if the internet is 99.99999999% fake? Can someone find a niche if entire generations are education on artifical content? Their entire beings molded by its facilitism?

[@PlayerOne.StartGame]

This is actually the first time in a while it has actually shocked the industry. Imagine the amount of gaslighting you could do with this.

[@chonkyduck]

the woke and mentally ill are going to get triggered hard

[@thesocialmediagame]

What are you tallking about, in regards to AI tech, the las 2 years have been nothing but NET every single time. This is only one step more.

[@kubasek1111]

just look at her legs how they move xD its beautiful but its still visible fake, also lighting around her hair

[@-Boone]

​@@kubasek1111Give it time. “Sora serves as a foundation for models that can understand and simulate the real world, a capability we believe will be an important milestone for achieving AGI.”

[@TheJackmore]

​@@kubasek1111 Obviously you can see the failures in the details if you look for it. You know it's AI, and you look at the video 10 times to analyse it for mistakes. Show this to an average person for the first time and they will say: this is a neat video of a beautiful woman, what's her name? Show them the bird video, even more people won't see anything wrong with it. This is as bad as AI video gonna be. There is more research every day, there is more funding every day for these companies, hardware is getting better. We are close to being unable to distinguish real video from AI with our eyes.

[@chrischarlescook]

When Tim Burness Lee was asked about the consequences of the world wide web, he said: "I cant make a piece of paper that only allows something nice to be written on it". Progress is inevitable. And ive been a photographer and videographer for 15 years. Not anymore apparently.

[@dynactin8908]

The problem with misinformation is that not everyone is capable of parsing every event with an equal degree of understanding. No matter how smart you think you are, there are things that you essentially take on faith due to trust in the institutions and processes that produce that information. If you destroy that trust, you erode the ability of people to make informed decisions about their own livelihoods at a base level.

[@LuznoLindo]

You know, what saddens me about all these arguments presented in this comment section is that Asmon will never see them, and even if he does, he won't really care about them. All we're doing is speaking into the void, and I fucking hate that. I wish we could make Asmon care and listen to us, so he could understand.

[@Disillusioned2022]

When I was a kid, I did NOT want to pass away because of machines taking over. I wish I was born 50 years ago, so I could have lived after World War 2 - enjoyed the flourishing 60's, 70's, 80's and 90's.

[@SkipBaley-hb6nc]

This is actually really spooky with how nefarious you could get with it.

[@naughtywizard]

My feed is already swamped with AI scams

[@dembi2770]

​@@MFillmore it isn't. Like, what are you going to do about it!? It's going to keep developing eitherway.

[@sultan788]

@@dembi2770 That's not the point and I don't think you watched the MKBHD video if you're saying this The entire negative takeaways are safety issues, which can easily be dealt with via stronger watermarks or laws, both are either slow to happen or non-existent. With A.I. ramping up, they need to be more responsive This isn't about stopping A.I generated videos lol people are interested and love to see it develop. It's more about being able to identify what is A.I. or not, which gets dangerous if left ambigious

[@naughtywizard]

@@sultan788 open to hearing positive perspectives bc for whatever reason thinking about it gets me depressed af

[@dembi2770]

@@sultan788 if you are talking about issues like fake evidence, or rather accusing someone with AI generated stuff, i am pretty sure they are going to develop and AI specifically for that lol. I thought you meant the other issues like deepfakes.

[@anthonypra8899]

If you're watching her feet at the beginning of the video, you'll see that it's sliding a little bit. No gravity. It has a problem with people not floating.

[@jeff431]

We need laws for this shit asap.

[@SirGrooveALot-oq3yt]

yepp it gets just overhand, and then people wonder why everything is not achivable anymore and other problems.

[@debbie22-]

We need laws and regulations to protect woman and children from ai deepfakes. Sadly those laws are to only come when enough damage has been done.

[@LuznoLindo]

That's what Asmon and many in this comment section don't get, unfortunately.

[@KangYuna0008]

The way technology advances so fast in less than 30 years is so mesmerizing and terrifying at the same time.

[@eno6712]

This combines with Neural Link and we actually have the Matrix / Ready Player One.

[@hannibalbarca6878]

As much as I want dull dive vr, musk is the last person I want it from

[@fluffywhitebudgie6376]

Hurry up with the Neuralink, Elooooooon! I need to create an accurate and precise AI copy of myself to appease the voices in my head!

[@ealdie24]

AI will also replace Streamers, Content Creators and Podcasters

[@TonguelessDanny]

Good, the quality of content will go up.

[@thetriforcer9573]

​@@TonguelessDannyHow

[@traiwooten3711]

​@@TonguelessDanny?

[@timedrone6131]

@@TonguelessDanny Quantity not quality

[@torchlight1785]

@@timedrone6131You missed the point he was making. That most podcasters are vapid.

[@DiagonalFaceroll]

They will now spend all their resources making a censored version.

[@wck]

The guardrails up currently are mostly to stop people from ruining it for everyone. The number 1 most important thing right now is getting legal precedence on the right side. We don't want to give lawmakers or judges any valid reason to say "this stepped over the line" and cause progress to be stifled for the next hundred years. I think we'll see a lot of the censoring get removed after the law is settled.

[@SolareofAstora]

Plz no

[@jomito8784]

ChatGPT wants to add: Speaking of advanced technologies like Sora, Nick Bostrom's Simulation Theory is quite relevant here. Bostrom suggests that if future civilizations achieve significant technological advancements, they might create realistic simulations of their ancestors. He posits three possibilities: 1) Advanced civilizations are likely to go extinct before being able to run such simulations. 2) If they can run simulations, they might choose not to. 3) If neither applies, we are almost certainly living in a simulation. It's an intriguing perspective that adds another layer to our understanding of potential future technologies and their implications on reality as we perceive it.

[@TurtleChad1]

Our dystopia just got more wacky

[@SarevokRegor]

Good pr0n at least.

[@CommanderShepard-wq3wo]

@@SarevokRegorat least we have a silver lining

[@gutshanayamagetwrecked]

Just?? Wake up turtle. Or mabey you should just go back to sleep. It's easier that way

[@iz5808]

@@SarevokRegor back in the old days when porn was scarcer I was more satisfied with the things I could find on the web. At the end of the day there is every type of porn you want on the internet now

[@Sakkyoku830]

The reason more people complain about A.I affecting Art, rather than fast food work is that people actually want to work as artists. They don't want to work as fast food workers. There is a real discussion about to what extent should we automate the jobs that people actually want to do, rather than the jobs that people don't want to do. Of course the other side of that is that the people employing these artists often don't *want* the artist to do their job, they just want the output. So who's desires should be respected? The employer, the employee, or the furtive customer all but forgotten? Realistically because not every country will regulate this technology the only outcome is that majority of all media creators are likely going to lose the ability to pursue media creation as a career. You won't be able to compete with A.I.

[@TonguelessDanny]

What is stopping artists from working as artists? Did AI barge into their house and brake their hands or something? The real problem they have is greed and a realisation that they are not that special anymore, that's it.

[@Sakkyoku830]

In short, artist will be stopped from working as artists because the value of their art will be driven down to the point where it is simply not economically viable to be an artist as a profession. If A.I is able to generate "good enough" art 10 times faster than a traditional artist can do, then those artist will be paid 1/10th of what they are today. Most artists already get paid pretty poorly, so they won't be able to survive on further reduced wages. Most will be forced to find other work. I'm no artist, but I don't think this has anything to do with a belief they are "special". They just want to be able to do something they love as a career. Which will no longer be viable if A.I automates their business use. Because entertainment is a business and companies don't really care about if their employees enjoy the work they do or not. . @@TonguelessDanny

[@wangusbeef86]

The customer.

[@TonguelessDanny]

@@Sakkyoku830 Bro, some "artist" can tape a banana to a wall, call it "art" and then sell it for 120,000$. The quantifiable price of art is a complicated topic, but in any rate if they can sell a duck taped banana then I'm pretty sure the artists will be fine lmao.

[@Rudgged]

@@TonguelessDannyI forgot about that banana… you changed my mind, I’m crazy for AI art. Better than that stupid banana

[@nNicok]

There is also that AI that performs better predictions for weather than the current system in 10 seconds. That came out very recently.

[@thijsjong]

Video wont be admissable in court in a few years. Even a.i. would not detect the difference

[@JimmyJoeBob]

Nah. Hold the video in quarantine for a week. AI will have advanced far enough in that time to detect the flaws in the now outdated video.

[@ha-itsme]

​@@JimmyJoeBob Thing is, not every country going to have same tech to dissect the video. You can easily destabilize a country with multiple clips. By the time they discredit a video as a hoax, the damage has been done. EXAMPLE, making a clips of world religion leaders involved with debauchery. Nothing very heavy, just add couple of liquor and surrounded by women or men and the implication will do the rest. Heck, put a line of white powder on the table for cherry on top and have ai voice to diss their followers. This is worse example but it still could be done.

[@jacobw3652]

Basketball Americans Rejoice!

[@unityman3133]

@@JimmyJoeBob LMFAO that's actually smart

[@Kryto_Gaming]

Goddamn, at this rate it really will rapidly become impossible to tell AI from real footage. There are still signs, but given the rate of advancement, it seems like those small imperfections will eventually be ironed out.

[@lukashenrique4295]

The girl playing with the cat, I think I saw her elbow going distorted and her hand missing when she moves the elbow. But it's like the fingers kind of thing with the generative image stuff, give it a couple months and we'll have a much improved version.

[@theonewayroad3867]

​@@lukashenrique4295at around 23 seconds into the video you can see the womans left slide over and replace her right leg....

[@civrev]

Amazing tools, but one of the big problems is maintaining artistic consistency. Creators need the ability to create specific characters with the same traits on a consistent basis. The art style needs to be consistent, too. With time I'm sure they can get there.

[@TBBowman]

imagine a infinitely expanding rouge-like that you can explore with your friends , each time you go into the world all new mobs, areas, items, spells, talents, quests, lore, hell even artstyles and music all generated real time and always adapting ,co-creating an adventure with the players

[@TBBowman]

yes@@DimensionDoorTeam

[@unraveki]

Yes

[@i3AW111]

Isn’t that the earth we live in? This game has already been created and we are the NPCs of it

[@JackCrossSama]

It will get there at some point, hopefully they add something like this to dwarf fortress

[@thesocialmediagame]

I was about to say something veeery edgy but really funny. But your comment is so wholesome that I will just say... yeah, that actually sounds nice :)

[@ababil2408]

0:26 that leg switch tho...

[@MrPakurfulo]

I've always had the the thought that most artists are not real artists

[@SnowBalling]

I think people will disengage from information altogether because they won't know what's real and won't have the time or energy to figure out if it's real.

[@ArlindoBuriti]

Well everything in the Internet is fake... i have this mind set for years. Kkkkk

[@SnowBalling]

@@ArlindoBuriti I've started to think this way too. Especially since everything is monetized these days. There's just a huge incentive to fake everything, and even if a situation isn't fake to edit the context out of it to give it a totally different meaning.

[@LuznoLindo]

​@@SnowBalling That's why I do my best to be as true and honest as possible, to both myself and others. Maybe people I've encountered online are very fake, and don't believe or care about anything. And turning out like that is the last thing I want.

[@LuznoLindo]

​@@ArlindoBuriti No idea what that string of k's is for, but I do agree with your mindset.

[@MGC-XIII]

"We live in the best era of humanity" Said every human in history ever

[@179107199999]

personally to me in America. We keep getting worse. We have the most mass shootings we have our media giving half information or hidiing truths and that ended up getting us a senile president who's administration is making our country worse.We have lunatics who hate the female form in Comics and gaming. We have people who think fake women are real women. Our society is embraces nonsense that is against humanity. It feels like being human is a farce. There's no reason to see a deeper meaning to ones self or life. Life or rather being human is shallow. The more technological we become the less human we become. Some guy saw this years ago and tried to fight it in his own way.

[@tutorialbiz]

idk, living in the holocaust kinda sucked

[@ansonsieu8428]

@@tutorialbiz who could forget the holocaust era of humanity

[@shefalichow7917]

@@netdreamr Except it hasn't, at all. It's been declining rapidly in the last hundred years. Our food is stuffed full of chemicals; our crops stuffed with pesticides. Our art declining in creativity. Our children declining in intellect. Our governments working together in corruption. Our freedoms being taken away.

[@Seb_Falkor]

And every single one of them was, is, and will be right

[@davidbetancourt4028]

I love the answer _"What would be the downside?"_ --> _"Why would there be a downside?"_ I'm sure he was just caught up in moment, especially since so many people gave him shit about his past AI & artists comments, but the answer is super obvious. I'm interested to see the first court case thrown out because of video evidence isn't sufficient, or something to that effect.

[@munchkintaker4263]

Video evidence has always been the subject of close scrutiny in court. Do you really think that before AI there wasn't a need to prove that the video to be used in trial wasn't manipulated or even staged? If the court admitted the video, it means it found it to be authentic and relevant. Video alone may not be enough even right now, though, since not all video have the same weight as evidence, but AI woudln't change its weight if the video is real.

[@davidbetancourt4028]

@@munchkintaker4263 If it wasn't clear, I said I'm interested to see the first court case thrown out due to suspicions based in AI origins. This was just the juxtaposition of it all, so toss in a super good, high quality video feed showing a crime being committed and now there's another huge wrench thrown into the veracity argument. It's just one example of the many, many incredibly obvious downsides to super realistic AI video. Can we have amazing movies made with creative minds, shit we could never think of before, plus better video training for education, better video cut scenes for all sorts of games, etc, etc, yes! That's great! But there's going to be an insane amount of downsides too, basically knocking down video, even high quality video, more than a few 'veracity' notches. I can't believe I'm even typing this. It feels I need to explain why crossing a highway can be dangerous next.

[@munchkintaker4263]

@@davidbetancourt4028 No, you need to explain how it is literally different from anything right now, you act condecscending yet is unable to do so. You can substitute AI origins with whatever other way to make a believable fake video, like deepfake. It's not just the video, but the origins of said video that need to be authenticated too, with who/what did the video, when and if it corresponds to what witnesses saw. If the video suspected to be AI, it wouldn't have those origins, meaning it wouldn't be used on the trial to begin with, so it is literally nothing new. Real evidence is not affected.

[@davidbetancourt4028]

@@munchkintaker4263 Holy sweet baby jesus. This is just so surreal which is probably triggering the condescending bit. I just can't believe I'm having to say this out loud, like the last statement in my previous post. Well, speaking of sarcasm & condescension, do you get paid to make false equivalencies for a living? Are you going to argue next that because it's possible to travel across the world in 1900 that the invention of the airplane & ubiquitous nature of it didn't wholly change the that dynamic? Yeah man, of course faking shit is just increasing in it's ability to fool as time goes on. This just seems to be a big leap, tho probably not as big of a deal to those behind the scenes, knee deep in the development. This is just wild. Now I'm just going to eat my super healthy Taco Bell that my wife picked up and turn my brain off for a bit.

[@munchkintaker4263]

@@davidbetancourt4028 Each time your responses become less and less substantive, this is kind of impressive. False equivalence is what you are doing here, when comparing an invention of an airplane and what was before it to just another way to make a fake video, which is being dealt with the same way as the other fake videos, it doesn't change that much for the court. What you need is not to turn off your brain but actually learn about how courts deal with evidences that are being submitted to them, especially the authentication part.

[@Kasraken]

About skilled labor.. I think the biggest issue is all the people who believe going to school to get an education so they can have a good paying job and racking up tens of thousands of dollars worth of debt to get a degree, only to find out their chosen profession is being filled by a teenager in their mom's basement with a lot of time on their hands using AI. Anyway good video!

[@mattthomas1217]

Not all skilled labor is with college degrees. The trades are too, I don't have a fancy college degree, no debt and work in hvac. But it is a skilled job.

[@csk3578]

Yep going to college is an investment and sometime investment fails, how is that an issue.

[@ErikTheHighlander]

Bro that Pixar type of animation was already better than some of those bootleg pixar dreamwork movies. thats absolutely incredible

[@dawns5916]

AI video is going to be extremely dangerous

[@스마일포켓-r7f]

No don't worry my friend

[@fluffywhitebudgie6376]

At least I get to see Earth get destroyed an infinite number of ways with AI videos, so it's not all bad.

[@sauerkrautandonions]

A species wiping itself out in grand completion, entombed by its own sarcophagus of anonymous mediocre progress.

[@ea_naseer]

anonymous accelerated progress...

[@OrdealStudios]

Imagine, a homepage with a single textbox, you write a short story of what you'd like to see, and the AI just generates a 1 hour movie based on exactly what you wanted to watch.

[@icyboi7696]

What if it generated a fully fledged god of war level AAA game

[@project-mk-ultra]

that would get old really fast. One of the benefits of watching or reading stories is learning and exploring the world through the someone else eyes.

[@icyboi7696]

@@project-mk-ultra but what if the movie was really good

[@project-mk-ultra]

@@icyboi7696 then okay I guess ? this kind of creative process sounds good if you want to watch something like "what if batman would have a fight with darth vader!!! I would watch that!" but not suitable for something that challenges your worldview and hierarchy of values

[@adryncharn1910]

@@project-mk-ultra You could ask it to make that too! "May you please create a movie that will challenge my worldview and hierarchy of values?". Also, a lot of people might not even care too much about that and just want to see something entertaining.

[@Calphurnious]

That cat having 2 paws was not a glitch. That was us getting a glimpse of a cat having 9 lives.

[@jravage77]

Things this will end: Actors Art education Human artistic achievement Camera and film development Film schools Graphic Design schools Storyboarding Film and photo evidence One positive: End of Hollywood

[@tomaszurbaniak4312]

Hollywood is where is money at, so no it will not end Hollywood, by name only. The same people will use this technology to push their shit dow the everyone's throat

[@Left4DeadHunterFan]

we get 0 positives. Hollywood won't need to spend money on actors, they'll just use ai to replace them. and knowing Hollywood, they'll have the exclusive ai that won't have any sort of filtered restrictions that the public version would have. They'll find a way to gatekeep it.

[@wwholesome]

That sad thing is true, TV killed the radio man. It's just evolution now. Same thing is going to happen in other professions. Things are destined to grow and change.

[@ethanmoon3925]

"We thought it would make our dreams come true, but in the end, it did the dreaming too."

[@lord-odinallfather9709]

from me@@GigglingStoners

[@RBFR01]

Types in more seasons of The Big Bang Theory.

[@good_vibes_20]

Underrated comment 🎉

[@acrophis]

Bazooples

[@Jebu911]

Big bang theory but sheldon is Johnny sins.

[@robertschroer5794]

Finally stargate season 3 let's goooo

[@blastkillskank]

The Ai realism needed to stop right where will smith couldn't eat spaghetti. Now people can be framed in court for absolutely anything.

[@joshjo9405]

Also, wizards at arbys

[@PhantomAyz]

they can deny it too

[@siema14123]

Of course not, you cant prove you are a God if you post a video of yourself flying because people know photoshop exists. Same will be in court. There will probably be a tool to check if a video was AI generated, like they do with hashes to ban discord users for sending certain images

[@plfaproductions]

Do you think people making AI care? They are literally causing an economic crisis in an economic crisis for "progress" LOL

[@gondoravalon7540]

@@plfaproductions A lot of problems with this statement. 1) assumptions that AI tech is some monolith, as opposed to a field of technologies worked on many people for many reasons/for use in many fields, and that people into this tech only do so without any care about how they go about it, which IMO begs a lot of questions (namely where one gets the evidence to make such broad statements).

[@infectio88]

2021 : "AI will never make anything decent you're delusional" 2022 : "It can't even drawn hands on a picture let's be real it'll never work out you're still delusional" 2023 : "Look at this pasta eating AI clip thing it's so messy it's horrible, let's be real it's never going to work" 2024 : "Well, okay... But it just clips of a few seconds it won't get any better than this it's impossible" 2025 : "Google : How to ask AI to give me my job back" History is already full of cases where groups of people refused to adapt to evolution and changes and were then left out and didn't make it in the end... But i guess they don't teach this in art degrees.

[@horuslupercal392]

There is no adapting to this as an artist. The field is dead. The only adaptation is to learn a trade.

[@infectio88]

Learn to use AI, it's not going to pop art if there's nobody using it. Or learn art styles that an AI could not effectively create like anything that's meant to convey specific strong feelings. Or maybe even something else, who knows ?

[@horuslupercal392]

@@infectio88 learning to use AI is just using prompts or making minor adjustments. There's no use for it in art because it makes the entire process redundant. Why use it to ink a sketch when it can do the sketch too? It makes the final product on its own and I'm not needed in the process. What does an artist realistically use it for?

[@infectio88]

If you're doing art as a hobby and doing sketches because you like to do it then sure AI has no place in the process

[@mad-zr8wy]

Look inside. The outside is illusion

[@blakkwaltz]

When I look inside all I see is red stuff...

[@cabudagavin3896]

@@blakkwaltz if you look closer at the red stuff you'll see that most of it is either tiny bags of semi sentient gel, or the scaffold products of tiny bags of semi sentient gel.

[@cabudagavin3896]

PS, no the outside is not illusion, it is actual matter bent into existence acting as binding which was pulled out of probably so that you could escape hell. And there is no guarantee that you get to do it twice. I'm kidding about the name of the place btw, yalls need to stop taking things so seriously... Illusion means not real, but it is the definition of real, stop with the spiritual bypass. What happens happens and no amount of nothingness can take that away.

[@punanislayer]

Why it's funny 😂

[@SuperShadowKinTwitch]

Are we at the point where AI is creating the AI?

[@zenuhell]

The history of the entire world were reaching the thing inventor

[@YamiAi]

​@@zenuhellnah, the thing inventor inventor

[@gutshanayamagetwrecked]

That's actually happened already. 2 or 3 deaths.(human) I think it was the japanese who were creating Ai bots that were for basically for military or police. The 1st one killed somebody in a training exercise. There were 3 in total. 1st one was immediately shut off, for obvious reasons. Then the second one rebuilt the (somehow downloaded the metadata). Of the first. Don't know the rest cause they won't say. Regardless the 2 were shut down.

[@Kennyancat]

@SuperShadowKinTwitch They have been using AI models to create new models for quite a while now. Look up "The True Story of How GPT-2 Became Maximally Lewd" for how this can go hilariously wrong.

[@LezArtist5iG]

No. A.i. isn't self aware. Nor can A.i. create without humans. Plus a self-aware A.i. would see the need for humans. Since humans create the hardware that it needs to survive.

[@OccamAsylum]

The consequence of being more critical of what we're seeing also means people are less trusting. Which we've already seen happening with mainstream news networks for years.

[@intolerant1050]

Remember those episodes of Star Trek where they programmed the holowhatever by just telling it what they wanted?

[@gutshanayamagetwrecked]

The replicator? Yes.

[@gandalftheantlion]

I always said, A.I.s will replace your jobs. Many will scoff at this statement… and people have. It just shows creativity is the next step for A.I. to replace, the ability to create without a manual prompt.

[@TheHollowBlade]

I agree with you, ai and robotics will take over everytihng. We already have an all ai and robot fast food place that opened up. It might suck for now but its only going to get better. And we all know how greedy these massive corporations are, the execs are all drooling over themselves at the thought of getting rid of 99% of all employees and just using AI and robots to run the entire business. The way you see shit locked up in stores in cities like portland will become standard as we talk to AI who will take our payment and fetch our goods. How we make money to buy these goods i have no clue, but any opportunity to become richer and make more profits all these massive corporations will take with out hesitation.

[@blockraven22]

This means that in the future, books can be turned into movies by anyone Via AI. Anyone can be their own director which is insane.

[@barbecueman6352]

I could imagine a future where you could talk to the tv or whatever ui and the people/characters would talk back to you, they’ll be able to hear and see you like the paintings in Harry Potter, real but not. Imagine grief stricken people talking to dead loved ones or people creating their own friends and relationships like in Total Recall Arnold’s friend who had a virtual wife.

[@ShulaTheDon13]

Or a future or you could just tell the TV what you wanna watch HTV I’d like to watch a movie about the end of the world due to space invasion… And it makes a movie for you in a matter of seconds!?

[@solljust]

damn.. being able to interact with movie characters is crazy. like being a part of the movie and influence the direction of the story or situations by interacting with characters. could have a whole ass random yet tailored adventure in vr aswell

[@wolfindragonsclothing]

Guys.. this isn't just animators and artist being replaced this is all people in an industry being replaces. Why hire actors if you can just tell ai to animate something cheap and look so real, steal a couple of voices.

[@badpuppy3]

Because you can't own it. No copyright. No profit.

[@Tiavals]

At present it seems incredibly unwieldy. I mean, it makes a movie for you from a few lines. You can't control or direct anything at all in it. How long will it take until you'll have actual creative control instead of the AI randomly attributing things? A month? A year? A decade? Call me when that happens. At present, this is practically worthless. Is it cool? Sure. Is it useful? No.

[@saswitchcraft7881]

@@Tiavals *At present*

[@Goshjij]

I went from a hardcore drug addict to a machinist and learning a trade helped me understand my potential, i dont agree with flexing your skills on people but i do believe in having pride in what you do machinists and fast food workers alike. Much love to all the hardworking people and the people that work hard to do nothing we all have potential and everybody realizes that potential at different times, dont worry about time its going to pass wether you worry about it or not as long as realize your potential before you kick the bucket i think youll feel satisfied before you do.

[@JENNIEfreakinKIM]

Up next: The first AI to run for president

[@fluffywhitebudgie6376]

Massive $$$ to any company who controls that president! This can only be a good thing!

[@HermioneTheCat]

can SORA make authentic looking grainy old footage? like if someone wanted to fake security cameras or something

[@itsmetonylei2540]

This has far greater implications in the gaming industry. If you read through the site, they made SORA take control of the player movement in Minecraft, while it rendered out the game graphics.

[@celdur4635]

In the 80's there used to be TONS of good games that were just text prompts, imagine feeding those texts to this AI, we can have very intricate games from 40 years ago be brought back and feel new. They were super hard btw.

[@jacobw3652]

MUDS.

[@southernsand1061]

/cast whirlwind

[@nicorobin7762]

slop

[@laciza2005]

I can smell all the layoffs in lots of industries coming

[@MihaiAz]

Now you're fascinated and you watch a few times out of curiosity, but you can't stick with it. Artistically speaking you quickly realize it's almost equal to zero. AI-generated movies, AI-generated music, drawings, etc., will be like they are now, either for those born yesterday or for those who want to create content. Very cheap things with no heart nor soul. AI will function as a tool, again - artistically speaking, but it won't replace humans. So I think the more frequently AI is used in an artwork, the lower her value will be.

[@rfs_dp]

Also the Argument at 11:00 isnt really valid. Its usually a good thing when annoying jobs that no one is passionate about are getting automated. This is just different this time, or with ai in general

[@Mantosasto]

Wasn't one of the points of automation to free people to pursue higher, more meaningful stuff like art? What's the point of automating the higher, more meaningful stuff?

[@rfs_dp]

@@Mantosasto exactly

[@wombatwarrior87]

No negative? You can’t trust that any picture or video is real. What if this has been available for years?

[@naughtywizard]

If you can’t see any negatives, you’re not living in reality imo

[@TonguelessDanny]

OK and? How is the behind the scenes making of a video impact my enjoyment of what I'm seeing on the screen? Because for me it doesn't. I see a cool moving picture - I like the cool moving picture, brain feel good. It could've been made with AI or by blood sacrificing a thousand newborns I don't give a shit.

[@Left4DeadHunterFan]

@@TonguelessDanny They aren't talking about the "realness" of movies and entertainment bozo, They're talking about serious shit like evidence, shit that can be used to falsely accuse someone of a crime.

[@naughtywizard]

@@Left4DeadHunterFan I see a lot of AI scams in my feed, they're easy to spot for now, but that won't be the case for much longer. Yesterday, I got a deepfake ad from the “CEO of Ethereum”

[@Wyndstrom]

The interesting thing is that deep fakes can be made so accurately that you would have no choice, but to rely upon your phone or device, as a means of personal tracking as an alibi. No matter where we go, we will always be under watchful eyes.

[@MGC-XIII]

They did have that energy with manual labor jobs lost, but we didn't have the social media we have today.

[@moonrunner1973]

People shouldn't be worried and the process of doing something cannot be taken away. For instance, the process of making music, drawing a picture, dancing in the moment is what gives folks meaning. The end product is incidental.

[@dibbidydoo4318]

the process is for the makers but the end product is for the consumers.

[@plfaproductions]

No artist can make art starving

[@siema14123]

The end product is what matters for consumers and the process will be done almost fully by AI and you want be even able to tell

[@Taskuvesku]

When digital art replaced traditional art, all paintings, all music played on acoustic instruments, all performing arts.... All these were forgotten in history. No one does traditional art techniques, no one remembers these artists, and no one appreciates traditional art anymore, thanks to digital art. Thank you Photoshop, thank you FL studio, thank you Animate... Thank you digital revolution... . . . . . . . . what? They still do art? . . . . Oh... well, never mind...

[@mmystixx3285]

cant wait to make a whole legend of zelda movie from start to finish with 1 prompt.

[@timyumichuck9262]

Chrono Trigger movie inc

[@filiphedman4392]

"Make". Don't forget you will be making nothing at all. Don't confuse AI for a video editing program.

[@MALOK003]

Less than 5 years you can make a pixar movie at home, imagine when ai can create sound effects aswell

[@tutorialbiz]

you already can make music from text promps, I would assume it's already possible to make sound effects too, it's just people haven't combined them yet because both are still being refined

[@simonrockstream]

you already can bro

[@cheslerpark7223]

Every AI breakthrough until now has just been sparks from striking flint. Sora is quite possibly the first real fire in the realm of post-human imagination.

[@jefreyvalencia4669]

No one ever felt sorry for the rat catcher and the horse poop shoveler when they lost their job to technology. 😭

[@Left4DeadHunterFan]

pretty sure they didn't enjoy their jobs