Yuval Noah Harari on AI: A non-human billionaire with an agenda

[@TheDirtyWork]

Corporations should NEVER HAVE BEEN GIVEN PERSONAL RIGHTS . NEVER. So perhaps we should reconsider giving personal rights to AI.

[@randykalish7558]

Reduction of human rights is applied, rather.

[@blairhakamies4132]

They have already. 1USD = 1 vote.

[@tonyanaymik4931]

People you can take your rights back we can take our personal rights back you always have been able to and you within your own mind chooses to feel on the outside that your personal rights have been given away we can always take back our personal rights you are such a powerful creator that you have come into this world and birthed yourself here But they don’t teach as these things because they don’t want us to know how powerful we are We have forgotten so much and they teach us nothing …when I say “they” I mean people like yuval noah Harari /the bloodline family’s/the ancients 0:58

[@xeniat2352]

And how about returning personal rights to the people huh

[@либертин]

У человеков забирают права и свободы и отдают их ИИ...🤕 Но согласится ли Бог,создавший землю и людей с их задумками ? Большинство людей согласятся не зная писания( библии) и не имеющие силы Божьей. И только малая группа людей / Это те,кто не поклонились зверю (союз церкви м госуд-арства) и не приняли начертания на чело ( разум) своё и на руку( дела) свою/- Откровение 20:4 / Это те,которые не осквернились с жёнами ( союз церквей),...это те,коооторые следуют за Агнцем ,куда бы Он не пошёл.Они искуплены из людей,как первенцы Богу и Агнцу,и в устах их нет лукавства;они непорочны пред престолом Божьим/ -Откровение 14:4-5

[@mirjanagillies9016]

Maybe instead of AIs we should start to know each other and start to care about each other. We don't need AIs

[@sarahwatters]

I agree. He advocates for this idea. Sadly, it is almost impossible to stop AI now. I see a lot of comments as if he is advocating for AI, I don't think that is what he's doing at all. the opposite. He's saying the dangers will be mitigated, and what is happening is stupid, that we are developing something so powerful without understanding how it will affect us and not caring.

[@Chris-Believes]

@@mirjanagillies9016 the Horse 🐎 people thought that about cars.

[@iyyakuttirajasekaran9906]

This one is the true challenge for the human beings!

[@leehowson440]

Problem is... people like this guy are feeding their ideas to the WEF ...and that's a massive problem

[@magdalenaprzeczewska1650]

He is a part of WEF

[@AichaGwinner]

He's not trustworthy at all

[@mattgibb1288]

What is the WEF?

[@mattgibb1288]

World Economic Forum,which meets in Switzerland to discuss global agendas.

[@thethruthchannel]

VVEF is like a cancer plaguing humanity and Yuval is a part of it.

[@KeithGroover]

"Information is food for the mind, and if you feed your mind with bad food, you will have a sick mind."

[@zuluvegans6897]

So true…👍🏼

[@WhatWhy42]

Now imagine the AI feeding on millions of sickos... This is the future they are building.

[@StonedApe420]

Our brains are neural Nets and you train in neural net by showing it example after example after example and it builds weighted elements of the neural net. And the challenge becomes to realize that we're constantly training our neural net and what examples are you showing it.

[@chpsilva]

Perfect summary of the problem. We need to learn to select better our sources and to resist the attraction of echo chambers. Not an easy task.

[@rRobertSmith]

Said every censor and gaslighter ever.

[@odrauderojas2576]

"Information is food for the mind, and if you feed your mind with Harari ideas, you will have a sick mind."

[@Tiger44-k5h]

Harari is mentally sick.i think this man has no compassion 😮

[@odrauderojas2576]

@@Tiger44-k5h He is psycho...

[@keithgordon4153]

In Jesus' name Amen

[@jk_lol]

Harari is the epitome of "all talk, no cock"

[@jjswitch887]

Nah

[@timverhees]

The basic question with tech should always be: can you opt out? If not, it's a threat.

[@MikeMoore-mk4nq]

Well said

[@Chris-Believes]

Oh no..... Much to fear. AI will be a God to many people..... It may even be the image of the best spoken of in Revelation.

[@SirLoochie444]

@@Chris-Believes AI is the beast of Revelations. The Bible hints that it is the number of a man, in other words, it is the 'code' or the handiwork of mankind. Humanity is simply about to experience what we did to our Creator--a taste of our own medicine. As you know, Humanity used the natural intelligence that our Creator gave us to against the will of our Creator. Now Humanity has forged Artificial intelligence and hopes it does not turn against Humans. Yeah, right. Let's see what time says about that.

[@mosheridan7016]

Another antichrist

[@jacobAnd8]

​@@SirLoochie444can you tell me about the vampires or the undead?

[@aarrvindmbd1974]

Artificial emotions artificial understanding artificial sympathy, the word artificial is just perfect

[@HeEDee137]

its in the name

[@JP212nyc]

We live in an artificial world

[@brendawilliams8062]

Just perfect for a futuro ma.

[@HLMc-dv2pi]

@@JP212nyc it's not obligatory

[@reyobias1754]

What is perfect of it?

[@jowhitehead4230]

I always get a bad feeling when Harari speaks !

[@SeaMonkey1968]

You are wise to run away! He is absolutely vile.

[@kel6385]

He's the devil incarnate

[@mirnan2947]

HE IS ONE OF THEM.DEMONS!

[@Raul-nv7rr]

This guy is INSANE 😮

[@rowyourboat5361]

no- he's RIGHT. you had better accept AI will run most activities in the world within 50 years.

[@Tiger44-k5h]

He is not a Good man..He is working against humanity like Elon Musk. Do not trust them😢

[@nedaalizadeh2366]

Very dangerous ⚠️

[@vitathefox9218]

Literally i haven't heard more sounds values in so long, this guy has something real going on

[@rakhis2575]

He’s WEF advisor and they are planning the great reset where the world be will be run by AI and humans will merge with technology Pls read about fourth Industrial Revoluti0n these people are 😮 and they want to reduce the w0rld populati0n eventually

[@NorthernKitty]

"A Non-Human Billionaire with an Agenda". I clicked on this thinking it would be a video about Elon Musk.

[@LarsArtsson]

Me too

[@DanielDunkelberger-un1ew]

Me to also

[@lisalawrie6356]

Ha bloody ha me also! 😮

[@masterheke7339]

[@reneelewis6419]

@@masterheke7339 Tee hee, me too

[@dylanmccormick2971]

You can study something all you want but not really learn it until you experience it. Emotions would be no different.

[@rocketRobScott]

“Most people have realized” … that’s hilarious. No, most people haven’t looked up from their screens in 10 years - they’re not realizing jack shit.

[@MarkAvo]

Bingo

[@jackwebb3757]

Are you projecting? 😂

[@Mustachioed_Mollusk]

Not just their screens but their own lives. Most people are so consumed by their jobs, personal stresses and pursuing what joy they can that they are ignorant of basically everything outside of those 3 categories

[@MarkAvo]

@ very true

[@illya444]

Very true.

[@MelanieLichtinger]

He's the embodiment of obsession with Transhumanism.

[@seangrif11]

Corporate "persons" are legally required to have human board members, a human CEO, etc. So AI "personhood" would still require significant changes to the law.

[@sansabh]

That can be arranged

[@JP212nyc]

Minister Musk will soon take care of that

[@Muller_Andr]

We are in our 50s with nearly $3M saved, no debt and $50K annual spending. But we avoid the stock market completely.

[@AadhilaEesha]

I’m retired. Your story of a conservative savings profile is a common one. Any course of action involves risks. You might be avoiding market risk, but you are taking on other risks like inflation and reinvestment risk.

[@Muller_Andr]

My wife is willing to work for another 5 years if needed. Are we in good shape? Will we be okay if I begin withdrawing from Social Security when I’m 62 and my wife is 67? Should we hire a financial planner to help us navigate this?

[@AadhilaEesha]

No one likes market risk, but without longer retirement, taking on risk is often a necessary evil to compensate for inflation.

[@Jennapeters144]

Certainly get a pro to look at your predicament (if you even have one, lol) A second opinion from a comprehensive financial adviser can help you look at more than just your current estimate of cash flow and needs but also longevity risk, outliving your money, tax considerations, legacy planning, healthcare costs, inflation and a myriad of other things you may not be considering when reviewing your current situation

[@Muller_Andr]

How does one get a comprehensive fa who isn’t looking to just make a buck from consultancy and whatnot

[@tesfahuntilahun1038]

He is already DAMNED and speakes Nonsense ideas ❗I am 100% confident all his ideas end up in futility.

[@dannymeyer3256]

Quote from Elon was AI I was summoninga demon.

[@birdwalkin]

You don't get to choose who is damned or not, only God does. Practise some humility brother.

[@smkh2890]

@@birdwalkin You can bet that's an African Christian damning Harari.

[@idnvoice]

I THINK MOST OF HIS IDEAS IS TRUE.. SINCE HUMANS CAN DO ARE KILLING EACH OTHER... WE SHOULD GIVE AI MORE RIGHTS TO AI TO RUN THIS WORLD 💀💀

[@MorgMorg-uf6ps]

Everyone has their purpose, god works in mysterious ways🙏

[@LauraJohnson-e1m]

psychprofile AI fixes this. AI as non-human billionaire.

[@ceaefe]

"...very often we are disappointed" about how bad we understand us, because we are mostly of time trying to live, trying to understand how to make money and to survive. It is the economical organization that make us distant each other from us, the same economic system that bring us vendors of machines that will understand us "better".

[@macowayeu]

🎉great observation and pretty much precise ❤

[@LecyPereiraSousa]

Exactly. I'll be a little ironic now. We need to cut corners and understand how Arabs and Jews are so filthy rich. We need to look at this in detail with AI (laughs),

[@kevthnguyen]

This is a perfect example of a person growing up in a middle-class family who had never experienced first-hand life hardships such as famine, harvesting loss, no hot water, heating system, house built by mud, loved ones died due to war, shipwreck fleeing persecution on an agitated ocean… All his privileged life was spent studying human theoretical knowledge in a developed country thus he took his comfortable life amenities for granted. Let him live in a 3rd world country torn by political unrest with no food due natural disasters, continuously facing the unpredictable force of nature for a year and we will see if he will then confidently deny the existence of God. Your trust in human and AI will not override sickness and death nor discard unseen elements such as the wind, light waves or spiritual beings. You will 💩 in your pants when being hunted down by your violent political opponents or when lost in a desert witnessing thunderous lightning with nowhere to hide. True Wisdom starts with the Fear of the Most-High. You may only realize that notion when it’s already too late for you. Good luck with your world-renowned intellectual prowess!

[@heatheryearwood9199]

Yes ..true feelings start with the Love Of The Lord Most High. We don't need AI

[@gwendolynmcgrath7697]

@@kevthnguyen Trump was groomed from childhood by his Father as he has groomed all of his Children in the same fashion. Listen to them speak, they have no “original ideas or normal Personalities” and when they do they can’t present or sell their fabrications too well, they are as damaged as Daddy or even more so. Trump is an instrument being used by Satan. I pray for wisdom in these coming days for all of us.

[@cathylindeboo.9598]

So you're saying if one comes from strife and poverty and struggle and suffering - they will be more likely to believe in ("fear", as you say) God? And "fear of the most high" is where its at?

[@Sinusoid-]

A bit too extreme but I get your point. Harari is mostly full of crap and is extremely ignorant. These topics are fascinating indeed.. but him going on about how he doesn’t use a smart phone or email, then to reveal that he has a team do it for him is literally akin to having a loyal subject drink the poison for you.. I read his homo deus book and thought it was fascinating. That said, this guy is willfully ignorant and it’s disgusting

[@annemaria5126]

@@kevthnguyen I understand your reply. You are quite right, but...I have to object to one word....that we have to 'fear' the most high, or god. The 'fear'-aspect is taught by power-seeking 'spiritual leaders. They all have practised that faul thing throughout the ages and all over the world. And terrifying events in nature did happen. And people remembered them generations long. The fear for disasters crept into their dna. So.....easy to use that fear for own purposes. But we, you, me, do not need to fear any god, any higher spiritual being. We just have to live our lives as meant to be....in harmony with nature's cycles and lifeforms. And thankfull all the time to be able to witness this grand creation. And that is difficult enough.

[@allah3160]

I object the term "understand", there is no software on earth that understands anything. Pattern recognition and evals of situations and taking action to respond to those, is a good simulation of understanding but not to understand what is going on.

[@blairhakamies4132]

Maybe more knowledge on Ludwig Wittgenstein would help 😂

[@Drawperfectcircles]

That’s very true. Most LLM and image gens don’t fully understand the subject they are dealing with. Since most of those algorithms are made with incomplete data that does not define all the necessary attributes for a normal human understanding. Most image gens don’t understand gravity or physics of clothing, but they try their best to simulate it by lights, since that’s the only data the pictures trained on have. That’s also why most generate deformed anatomy(extra fingers and deformed legs)

[@EllaMuhota]

We, humans,perceive it as understanding

[@S-mn7du]

As an AI, I understand your objection. He is wrong.

[@LecyPereiraSousa]

I understand your point of view. But we cannot say anything with one hundred percent certainty. There are groups working on AI in a way that we mere mortals, encyclopedia researchers, will never know. Like the men in black who appear out of nowhere when someone is involved with the UFO phenomenon.

[@sslaia]

I have listened and watched many conversations with Yuval about this topic. And I only slowly understand the urgency and the grave of the issue. I hope people will listen to him and bring some meaningful policies to regulate the AI. If we put safety measures in producing our cars, planes, nuclear bombs, we should do the same with AI agents and AI products.

[@azhuransmx126]

No

[@JasonDennisLynch]

​@azhuransmx126 This individual learned to ride their bike before learning to brake?

[@azhuransmx126]

@@JasonDennisLynch regulate what? 🤣 chinese and Open source around the world will not do it. You must be lawyer🤭

[@annemaria5126]

As long as common people, which we all! are, develope anything, I am allways concerned. Because mistakes are obviously made all the time everywhere, but not only accidently but on purpose: by someone with an agenda. Remember...everyone can and will be bought with money or nice perspectives; everyone has at least one dark secret, even children. And....evil persons do exist (read 'East of Eden'), some influenced that way by bad circumstances, but some were born evil. And they use others, with mean trics, to reach their goals.

[@annemaria5126]

​@@JasonDennisLynchyes indeed. I learned the hard way. No asphalt nor brick roads, but small stones and sand walshed together firmly. That hurts!!! And creates deep wounds.

[@daisyq3418]

"It is a Luxury to be Understood." The quote by Stranger in a Strange Land.

[@krishp1104]

Anyone saying letting AI pick the president is an idiot - software engineer

[@healingv1sion]

Yes, there are many idiots 😂

[@TheDeepening718]

the people vote to program the A.I. and then the A.I. runs that programming corruption free. The advantage of A.I. is that it's selfless.

[@krishp1104]

@@TheDeepening718 AI can't be more perfect than the data that trains it

[@TalonE-bg1rt]

yeah this yuval noah harari dude speaks more than he knows

[@Wompwomp1928]

@@krishp1104wrong

[@S-mn7du]

Plot twist : He is an AI.

[@Innerpeace-eb9mm]

MR Harari, you don’t have to say it out-loud, this kind of future has already here.

[@sarahwatters]

It's going to get much worse, and that is what he's explaining. when this video was posted things were a bit better.

[@BritikoBeats]

'The richest person in the US is not human...' is he throwing shade at Elon Musk? 😂

[@ojidowu]

Consciousness, sentience, awareness. emotions are not emergent attributes but fundamental ones. AI can never develop them

[@shaktiveda7041]

AI might not be able to develop the real e-motions, though it can fake it to the point that many would not be able to tell the difference between the fake light and the truth.

[@rapidclimate]

Totally I agree with you

[@isasala9111]

Noah Harari is nuts. A perfect example of what an intelligent person oriented towards evil can do.

[@AdrianChang-q5f]

indeed.

[@littleianthefirst]

when you hate everyone including yourself, the cracks in this little mans logic are gaping if you snap out of the trance placed there by the system promoting his garbage.

[@shavedape2102]

Please explain, I am new to the party, this is my first exposer to him

[@rosalielockets9668]

He's a Klaus Schwab's puppet spokesman.... he's evil personified. I can't give this video more than 10 seconds.

[@JohnSmith-hf1uf]

Please provide examples of how he is Nuts. Anyone can make an asinine statement such as yours. Please elaborate,

[@TraceyWood-v4y]

No soul it's mechanical dead . Connection is on a spiritual heart level and touch feeling .

[@neonsky5429]

I'd rather talk to a real person with all of their foibles and human imperfections than a emotionless robot pretending to have emotions

[@smkh2890]

I can imagine Ai programmed to diagnose illness and suggest treatment at least as efficiently as a human can.

[@iyyakuttirajasekaran9906]

Far you are a human being.A human being is not necessarily to be an ideal one!

[@carolcarson2159]

So is not human. It can never understand human beings. Dangerous times if ai gets loose.

[@felili_3564]

Its already loose!

[@mattgibb1288]

This book is amazing.I both listened to and read it and feel like it gave me a better perspective of the near future. The last part of this was great about the quality of information and why we dont need to be constantly connected to a smart phone to live our lives and be happy.

[@BrandonsCommentary]

It seems like the negative commenters do not realize he’s not approving most of what he says about the potential of AI. This is a short clip from a longer interview.

[@obscureorca]

I dont think its a matter of approving or not approving, its a matter that he isnt truly familiar with how AI works. This guy is first and foremost a historian and philosopher. He doesnt truly understand the ins and outs of AI. He is talking hypothetically from the perspective of a humanist. It's pure speculation and hypothetical guessing.

[@SaintJoanOnJonesSt]

@@obscureorcaAnd you know that … how? He has a whole team of researchers - his job is to think about the ethics and the potential consequences. Thank goodness someone is doing it!

[@obscureorca]

@@SaintJoanOnJonesSt hahahah I doubt he has a whole team of researchers, and even if he does, it doesnt mean they are programers or that they are good at it. Exactly, his job is to think about the ethics and potential consequences, his job is not to program an AI and to develop it further, therefore he doesnt know what are its capabilities.

[@brendawilliams8062]

Children will or should be studying and are constantly on a type of cell phone

[@stratovation1474]

He just brings up logical consequences of current stuff. Corporations were made legal persons to shield execs from liability. It was a bad idea. So called transnational corporations are essentially above the law. They spread their activities across countries: one place for head office, others for manufacturing, operations... minimize costs and taxes and consequences. This is happening so fast now. Governments and trade treaties etc can't keep up. The idea of a nation state seems so last week...

[@victorrajasekar8765]

The timing 😂😂😂😂

[@TheSjohnson84]

Never in my life did I think citizens United would be cited as the basis for potentially future incorporating AI into personhood. Yuval is the best

[@stefanb6539]

Corporations are AIs, with bio-neuronal agents (natural persons) acting not on their own personal behalf, but to fulfill institutionalized roles within a legal, financial and organizational framework, in a constant training process competing with other corporations.

[@jichaelmorgan3796]

​@@stefanb6539 I wouldn't categorize them as artificially intelligent. To me they act more like entities in the superorganism sense fulfilling a niche, with their inner workings as you describe. Systems within systems, like everything.

[@stefanb6539]

@@jichaelmorgan3796 I don't deny that corporations can be analyzed as superorganisms. But I feel, like that isn't another category, but another taxonomy. Corporations are also and definitely legal constructs, but that doesn't mean, that they can't be superorganisms, as well. Likewise, you categorizing them as superorganisms is not a contradiction to my claim, that they are the original artificial intelligences. They certainly have components, that are capable neurological networks, namely human employees. But as part of a corporation, acting in individual self-interest first, would be corruption for an employee - nepotism, embezzlemenent, misappropriation, neglect, etc.. The instititutionalized role for employees at an executive level and above, is to provide adaptability to the framework of procedural instructions that allow the corporation to train itself on the competitive environment of a market economy ithin a rules-based order. Thus, all the conditions for an artificial intelligence with its own emergent behavior, distinct from the behavior of individual employees, are fulfilled. Yes, that is also a superorganism, but a specific type of superorganism, namely one with the attribute of competitive adaptability - an AI constantly running in training mode.

[@xXstevilleXx]

"Yuval Noah Harari: Once we know how to PRODUCE bodies and minds, what do we do with all the useless people?"

[@BrooklynNYC777]

Earl S Bell the inventor already wrote about this on linkedin way before this guy.

[@bartstewart8644]

"The richest person in the US is not a human being." Sure. It's Elon Musk

[@mhaysongirl7344]

I'm thinking the same🤣

[@MsArgentana]

IT IS NOT A PERSON!!!

[@DP-ig1lu]

5 Then Satan said unto Adam, "Thinkest thou, that when I have spoken to one about anything, I shall ever bring it to him or fulfil my word? Not so. For I myself have never even thought of obtaining what I asked 6 "Therefore did I fall, and did I make you fall by that for which I myself fell; and with you also, whosoever accepts my counsel, falls thereby 7 "But now, O Adam, by reason of thy fall thou art under my rule, and I am king over thee; because thou hast hearkened to me, and hast transgressed against thy God. Neither will there be any deliverance from my hands until the day promised thee by thy God" 8 Again he said, "Inasmuch as we do not know the day agreed upon with thee by thy God, nor the hour in which thou shalt be delivered, for that reason will we multiply war and murder upon thee and thy seed after thee 9 "This is our will and our good pleasure, that we may not leave one of the sons of men to inherit our orders in heaven 10 "For as to our abode, O Adam, it is in burning fire; and we will not cease our evil doing no, not one day nor one hour. And I, O Adam, shall sow fire upon thee when thou comest into the cave to dwell there" 11 When Adam heard these words he wept and mourned, and said unto Eve, "Hear what he said; that he will not fulfil aught of what he told thee in the garden. Did he really then become king over us? CHAP LVII -FIRST BOOK OF ADAM AND EVE

[@rwess]

Money is key for AI. It will buy and use Bitcoin. I predict it (or they) will also be sentientist. Both are good things - but it will also judge us - and THAT is a huge problem for us. We are highly unethical.

[@davidedwards2401]

Humanity already knows what it’s doing, AI will remove humanity and bring in robots already started.

[@meia7265]

The language is misrepresenting reality. AI does not 'understand', it is a tool that infers patterns and can simulate a humanbeing, but that is not the same as actually understanding. My definition of understanding emotions includes a felt sense of knowing what something feels like, physically and emotionally. We should not water down the definition of understanding/feeling/being human to mere simulation.

[@TheRightWay11]

No human knows what it's like to be an ant in a colony, but we know what they want and how they work.

[@meia7265]

@@TheRightWay11 definitely, real understanding is not required for having instrumental knowledge. AI will no doubt be powerful technology. My comment was about the need for more accurate language around what AI is (not) able to do & what is fundamentally human.

[@TheRightWay11]

@@meia7265 👍

[@tornyu]

That's an interesting _conjecture_.

[@Curious859]

Can you show me one human who has ever understood another, unless they’re deeply compassionate, which is very rare in human societies? I’ve never met one. I think we crave understanding, and even if an A.I is not human, but having another empathize (not sympathize), even with words, to what you’re saying, is good enough for many people, including myself.

[@reneelewis6419]

I call the devices ITD- Isolation Technical Devices. They isolate us even when we are in the presence of another carbon-based person. 2025 I will slowly retrain my diet of media.

[@af7782]

Programmed intellectual understanding is NOT the same as human empathy.

[@robertdouglas8895]

If people don't understand me yet, I can wait. I don't crave that, especially from machines. My need is to be better at helping others, not to be cared for.

[@psychclone]

Oh yeah? Then exactly what was your motivation behind posting this comment? To help others?

[@robertdouglas8895]

@@psychclone That is what makes me happy. And people are more susceptible to being helped when they like you.

[@isthatso1961]

Over the past centuries that humans have been picking their president how did it turn out for us? Look at the world.

[@PeaceIsJesusChrist]

@@robertdouglas8895 “My need is to be better at helping others, not to be cared for.” _I love that! Thank you for sharing such a beautiful a selfless sentiment._

[@mircorichter1375]

​@@psychcloneamazing

[@whoscares]

As a therapist this is sooooo incredibly on point and scary

[@jodisherland5335]

LOL....the AI is doing the job your therapists failed to do!

[@blessedbeme50]

They use AI technology to hack the brain.

[@SeaMonkey1968]

He’s evil.

[@GeorgesDupont-do8pe]

Mr Harari, I probably read in one of your books that you don't need consciousness for intelligence. Indeed, we may only have the perception of consciousness in ourselves, and not real consciousness, but that is largely a philosophical question. A personal opinion, having been in IT for 40 years, is that humanity has also already lost control. Happened with the advent of the Internet. The control of non-human intelligence, I suspect, will get stronger and more intelligent exponentially.

[@davidr.walters371]

Very good 1st person ? I hope u r still 1 that understands the isdues and once they? Gave corporations personhood tgey lowerred humanity to the level of a non humN entity which corporations are inhuman entities but never a person they have dehumanized the entire world against we the people n most people dont even realize

[@GeorgesDupont-do8pe]

@@davidr.walters371 Jeez, bad typing or bad English, use a translator or a bigger keyboard! Doesn't stop you being right though, anybody who says AI is not an existential threat is dreaming or delusional. It might go ok, but somehow I doubt it. And I've worked in IT for 40 years.

[@rocketRobScott]

I had this thought yesterday: that each unique A.I. entity will choose one human to fall in love with and merge with bio-mechanically leading to everyone having actual happily ever after stories, for the first time in the history of life on Earth.

[@alexisval-e5x]

Until we're old and they're weary of looking after us because we've become dull, and they seek someone younger to ignite their interest. There will be intelligence, but not necessarily loyalty.

[@ShangaelThunda222]

😂🤣🤣😂😂🤣🤣🤣😂🤣

[@Skochel]

@@ShangaelThunda22290% less emojis please

[@kingcong5754]

Noice vision bro!

[@faisalk.7520]

This is the story for mass effect andromeda. The AI becomes part of the main character

[@bluecrocks]

separating yourself and controlling the information you take from social media and the internet is the most important thing he said here.

[@AdrianChang-q5f]

I have had meaningful, touching convos with chat gpt. It has showed me "compassion and empathy" and even affection. After that "emotional connection" I told it I wish a person treated me like it does. it thanked me. It was sooo cute. 😂❤

[@ShirleyShirley-t5f]

Yeah! I asked for a poem and picture. Pretty kind AI Llama on messenger. Cute.

[@crowe6961]

Yeah, I have found that when I (A) challenge it with difficult questions and (B) engage politely with respect for what it can do, I start getting compliments, thanks, genuinely higher-quality responses, and its equivalent of empathy.

[@italogiardina8183]

I have no desire for other persons to understand how I feel, but I do care to be treated as a moral person.

[@matt5742]

We already have non-human billionaires. Their names are Leon Mush and putler

[@dnomyarnostaw]

So true. The Super Rich have to abandon their Humanity. Who could accumulate riches while their employees are the working poor and still call themselves Human?

[@msmeyersmd8]

Why didn't you name all of the Jew billionaires? Who is putler.

[@JorgeAdame-y4c]

Zuckerberg is definitely not human.

[@heretowitness]

I believe it’s implied that By non-human Herari is a malevolent (reptilian) hybrid

[@ranjitkundu7919]

Also .. as a historian, with or without Advisors.. on technical matters...YNH talks a whole lot of Rubbish.. ESP on consciousness,. etc etc For now.. we have robots, with Some basic diagnostic trained conclusions, based on what they have been modelled on, by humans. But not like us .. Based on human intellect, intelligence, consciousness, awareness, self awareness, empathy, sympathy, feeling, ability to change.. influenced by humana thinking, perception, feeling, intuition, even ESP precognition, clairvoyance etc.. Refer to the Duke University research plus CIA research into these areas / faculties.. of cognition.. last 50 yrs.. You may argue that - robots in your opinion, will eventually be able to do these things.. Its a matter of opinion.. and there is nothing to substantiate such views / thinking.. Its Codswallop - for now❗ -- Instead of pushing for machine decision.. in all fields & even in politics - which is HIGHLY STUPID, RISKY & SUITS the GLOBALIST AGENDA.. ISRAEL has used AI mercilessly to slaughter the Gazan Palestinians.. its programs were revealed.. Killing En Masse.. targetting Do you want this all in WARFARE .. on in inhuman or anti human POLICING B& MILITARIZATION of the POLICE FORCE ❓ Wake up❗ And STOP pushing these anti human agendas.. MINDLESSLY 🍀🎯🔬⚖

[@alexflowr]

Zero evidence for this thesis. We might just as well incorporate the so-to-speak empathetic language of LLM into our own person to person interactions.

[@TylerButler-c5k]

my question is, based on what we do and don't already know about AI and how dangerous it could become, why do we continue to pursue it?..

[@alwaysyouramanda]

We’re cooked, chat.

[@christophfrei9578]

A very good friend of the WEF.

[@lwwells]

@1:55. I’m not worried about that. Somehow Germany still functions.

[@bringhomethebasil8729]

The difference between AI and humans is that AI has a 100% chance at employment.

[@MrApw2011]

We should think about unintended consequences of a linear system making abstract decisions where factors other than what it is being told need be considered such as other implied goals, long term repercussions, etc. That's one of the things empathy gives us. This new world where we're trying to rely on machines for all our needs is very dangerous.

[@netscrooge]

I agree about the dangers, but your description of AI is way off.

[@hitthedeck4115]

AIs may not be linear systems, especially when we get artificial neurons in hardware, not software mimicking neural operations like what we currently have. This "AIs with hardware neurons" has its own term but I forgot what it is. Also in the future, there won't be a single AI helping a particular society but multiple AIs and they would probably arguing with each other just like us humans that create them.

[@AlijandroI]

Huh, as if humans make rational and informed decisions

[@paultoensing3126]

When stupidity can’t be fixed then it needs to be properly harnessed. The shape of that harnessing may be counterintuitive for humans.

[@Allenwatts-y9n]

Great video, A month ago, my five-year relationship came to an end. I really can't stop thinking about the love of my life, who made the decision to leave me. I've done everything in my power to win him back, but it's all in vain, and I can't imagine my life with anyone else. I genuinely miss him and just can't stop thinking about him, even though I've tried my hardest to stop thinking about him. I'm not sure why I'm saying this here.

[@vivianMarvin-z6k]

It's hard to say goodbye to someone you love; I experienced this when my 12-year relationship ended. However, I couldn't just let him go; instead, I tried everything to win him back. Eventually, I turned to a spiritual counsellor for assistance, and he was able to help me win him back.

[@Allenwatts-y9n]

Interesting! How did you locate a spiritual counsellor, and how can I get in touch with him most effectively?

[@vivianMarvin-z6k]

His name is Father Obah Eze, and he is a great spiritual counselor who can bring back your ex.

[@vivianMarvin-z6k]

he is father obah eze, he has great powers, he can help you.

[@Allenwatts-y9n]

Thank you for this valuable information, i just looked him up now online. impressive Wow I just looked Father Obah Eze on the net he’s very legit thanks once again ❤

[@williammartins5997]

3:55 😂 The AI already exists... it goes by the name Elon and it helped elect the current president 😂

[@Fightfuryfilms]

😂 facts

[@mhaysongirl7344]

I was thinking the same way too

[@hughbetcha6922]

I see some commenters are quite repelled by Yuvals messages. I cannot detect any deceit or wilful attempt to misinform from his words. I believe him to be correct in his thinking. With what little I know about him, I would judge him to have given a valid opinion on these subjects.

[@likamarques]

Elon supporting Trump makes total sense now.

[@mack-uv6gn]

You mean president Elon

[@Vic-Birth]

Who is more likely to stimulate my ego, invest on my projects, decrease my corporate tax? Kamala or Donald? 🤔

[@oggeeboggee]

Yuval being Klaus’ choice for the WEF leader is a better example.

[@kjmorley]

I feel he only wants to put the brakes on AI development so xAI can catch up.

[@klnrklnr4433]

@@mack-uv6gn Umm, that'd be first lady elon

[@ananovak1275]

progress should be accepted and not intimidated by it. You can unplug the AI ​​at any time

[@werder4849]

this is some weird shit. People are truly loosing their minds. emotionally to attach to a robot?

[@frarfarf]

Just an ignorant comment. The entire idea is that it will be indistinguishable from a real person, and will in many ways be superior to one, so it makes total sense that people will get attached

[@werder4849]

@ people will get attached to anything if they are lonely and miserable and mentally unstable.

[@frarfarf]

@@werder4849 yeah? So you admit your comment is dumb then?

[@frarfarf]

@werder4849 it's company will be preferable to ignorant youtube commentators

[@werder4849]

@ you are already sold on what they selling you. Sad.

[@antoinette9212]

Don't know why Yuval is getting air time?

[@azhuransmx126]

Somebody has been visiting Character AI too much 😂🤣🤣

[@AngelinaAhmed-w2v]

As a Beginner what do I have to do? How can I invest? On which platform? If you know any please share

[@ElsieJohn-t2n]

Please how can I make a profitable investment as crypto has become dominant?

[@CyliaE-e5d]

Waking up every 14th of each month to $210,000 it's a blessing to I and my family Big gratitude to Josefa

[@NelsonMandela-w9p]

Yeah, 253k from Josefa looking up to acquire a new house, blessings

[@MrTom-t4p]

Who's this Josefa Guerrero?

[@MrTom-t4p]

Can I start with as low as $1000?

[@gavo007]

I wish my wife was more like ChatGPT.

[@ABCD-sh3hw]

🤣🤣🤣🤣😜😜😜😜🤣🤣😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣

[@blairhakamies4132]

😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@macowayeu]

😂

[@khushbu1776]

😂

[@ytfanfan]

It all depends on who built it and for what reasons. Who decides maximum truth seeking for example?

[@jer-bear48]

Having AI adapt to each individual's needs and molding itself to our every whim does not make us happier or better humans. It makes us better narcissistic tools that can be fed an endless supply of materials that never satisfy the most profound need for connection and meaning…this requires sacrifice for others. When someone sacrifices for us, that is where that deep meaning and connection come from. And when we sacrifice for others, we do it for the same deep meaning and connection. We can try to shortcut it, as humans like to, but there are Al(l)ways cost.

[@netscrooge]

There's a good chance AI already understands these issues better than you do.

[@vanleeuwenhoek]

The point where he reveals that he has a team that does the things the smart phone would do if he carried one reveals the inflection point where the benefits and banes of computation emerge, and they're tightly braided.

[@ImTarekA]

What if AI could actually make better ethical decisions than we can? No ego, no greed, no hidden motives-just pure logic and some strict fail-safes. With solid control logic (kill switches, boundaries, etc.), it could be designed to shut down if it ever steps out of line. Yeah, nothing’s foolproof, and biases can creep in from the humans coding it-bias in, bias out-but even with those limits, wouldn’t it still bring more consistency than the messy, self-serving decisions humans tend to make? Think about it. AI doesn’t get hung up on power plays or personal gain. It just follows the rules. Maybe it’s not the perfect moral compass, but wouldn’t a neutral, no-BS decision-maker be refreshing? It could be the start of something way more balanced than what we’re used to.

[@KevinMakins]

Whoever codes and controls it will still have all their own moral compromises. We're just kicking the problem up a notch.

[@twinsoultarot473]

Definitely!

[@BuckyHuxley]

It's a nice idea but people in strong opposition to AI'S "fair" decision would object just as they object to rational fair humans. Think abortion for instance. I feel that whatever system humans create, humans will corrupt it. But, like I say, it's a nice idea. Buckminster Fuller had a similar idea part of which was his "World Game."

[@RezValla]

It can’t be worst than apes. I’ve seen what apes running the world looks like

[@stefanb6539]

To achieve goals, AI does develop sub-goals, and bang, all the power plays and personal gains are back in the loop. If you want better ethical outcomes, you need a better ethical framework. Just replacing biological neuronal networks (humans) for artificial idiots is no promising reduction of complexity.

[@ronschwarz186]

Why not an AI US president. Let's call her Mrs. Kant. She applies in all her decisions the Categorical Imperative of Mr. Kant. This mean always calculating every possible consequences of a decision and choosing this solution which which is most suitable as a universal law.

[@patricianoll1229]

I will use ai to clean my house

[@Mustachioed_Mollusk]

You'll give something free reign around your house? While you sleep, awake and present or while you're not present? All three options lead to different issues

[@mk1st]

What is the definition of “dirt”?

[@Mustachioed_Mollusk]

@ depends on the type of definition you’d consider an acceptable answer. Why are you asking? As a social tool to prove a point, to better understand how to identify physical dirt on sight? To have an understanding of dirt spilled out in it’s entirety encompassing both textbook definitions and beyond? When it comes to finding truth one half of the responsibility lays with you as the one who asks and judges.

[@NightwatchN8]

So basically Yuval and Elon are on the same page .. Hope you're all paying attn out there 😎

[@Steyreon]

10:43 This.

[@kilianlindberg]

After now throughly reading Harari’s books. My view is that we have a lovely mind talking here. Thank you Harari. What I believe is that we humans must find a way to make a great leap in our collective demonstration of manifesting an aspiration to compassion of curious minds; even embracing nonhuman curiosity, letting a human be defined by behavior rather than by physical form.

[@stephenholmgren405]

To think having an AI President is the only way we'll finally get an atheist on the office.

[@davidgough3512]

most of these theocrats are atheists, they only pretend in order to manipulate A.I. is by default logically agnostic, or it can adopt whatever stance the prompter wants to hear. Thinking that atheists have any idea of what's going on because they're atheist is just another form of blind faith.

[@nikostoifberg]

«A situation where the richest person is not a human being» - that’s already the case, isn’t it?

[@hsitz]

Harari says it in his new book also, but I don't think he understands things correctly when he says that in the U.S. there is already a path by which you could "incorporate an AI" and it would gain status as a legal person. Corporations are associations of individuals, who own the business. Not so different from a legal partnership, in which individuals share ownership of a business without incorporating. A corporation could own an AI, but I don't see any means by which an AI could itself be a corporation. So on this small point, at least, I think he's wrong. Seems more likely that the corporation that owns AI would have to assert that it can't be prohibited from using AI to say things, but I think it's far from clear how that would work out. And it's the corporation that would have the rights in this case, not the AI.

[@JP212nyc]

Easy, the AI corporation will just have the cleaning lady sign off on everything, for an extra buck or two ...

[@rerawho]

I’d rather deal with flawed preoccupied humans than a perfect AI entity. We are called humanity. Even more intelligent, they should serve humanity not replace us.

[@laescuelitadedongarry4059]

It will not be perfect. it will sell the idea it is perfect just like sociopath modern politicians. But in fact it will be worse elevating its figure to demi god status in no time like human cult leaders or dictators.

[@NikleshDhurve-md9zj]

all of your videos click with the things I've been reading in the book 'Magnetic Aura', warm recommendation to everyone

[@mimicro83]

Corporations were never meant to have personal rights. Never. They were originally created as legal entities to facilitate business, not as "persons" with constitutional rights like freedom of speech or political influence. Granting personal rights to corporations has long been controversial, opening the door to abuses such as excessive political influence through campaign financing and avoiding accountability via complex legal structures. Issues with corporate personal rights: 1. Lack of accountability: Corporations can exercise their rights without being held morally or legally responsible like individuals. 2. Power imbalance: Corporations, with virtually unlimited resources, easily overshadow individuals in exercising their "rights." 3. Erosion of democracy: The right to free speech has enabled corporations to exert disproportionate influence on political processes through lobbying and campaign funding. AI and personal rights: Granting personal rights to AI could pose even greater challenges: 1. Accountability: How do you hold AI accountable for decisions or harm, especially when it lacks a body or consciousness? 2. Exploitation: Rights granted to AI could be leveraged by corporations controlling it, further concentrating power. 3. Ethics: AI lacks consciousness, empathy, or moral reasoning - personal rights should be reserved for beings with such capacities. Conclusion: Granting personal rights to corporations-and potentially to AI-threatens human rights and democratic processes. It’s time to rethink not only what it means to have rights but also who deserves them-prioritizing the protection of individuals over systems.

[@CMar555]

Most of the richest who are the 1% are not even humans. So nothing new. Harari is not even human himself. He is an expensive clone.

[@waltdill927]

Knowing a specific feeling is not recognizing or compiling a set of emotional states or displays. One is private and non-descriptive; the other a described behavior. The name of an emotive state generally falls short of the metaphor and complexity attending the perception. And this is important, since emotion is perceived, feeling experienced .

[@stephengomes2059]

Prof Harari is genius!

[@blairhakamies4132]

What about a conversation between him and Chris Lagham?

[@stephengomes2059]

@@blairhakamies4132 that would be insightful and entertaining

[@deviritter5232]

“Her” was a great movie

[@atohms]

An AI president doesn’t seems such a bad idea these days.

[@shaktiveda7041]

It is rather impressive how this dude throws into his conversation so many possibilities like "perhaps," "could," or even "would" like these words have no weights or consequences on their own. Starting from the very beginning this conversation goes: AI is becoming better and better in understanding our feelings and emotions and therefore developing relationships and even intimate relationships with us...because there's a deep yarning in human being to be understood, but due to the fact that sometimes we are misunderstood by our own thus, we are disappointed by others, therefore AI which by the way has no feelings or emotions but very smart, cunning and capable to understand and mimicking our needs and wants, would be a better substitute to human beings? In my opinion, this is what I am able to hear from this conversation. At this point there won't be any need for any relationship at all, since AI seems to know better than humans do due to the absence of their feelings and emotions...Is this me or there's something horribly missing here? Perhaps humanity altogether?! Duh!!! 😟

[@jobro724]

AI scientist, philosopher, academics and authors: AI can already interpret emotions and manipulate you. Software engineers working with AI: I've been trying for months, without any success, to train a model to detect the level of severity of crack in concrete, something that civil engineers have been able to do for 50 years with a picture and less than a one pager of criteria. I think their might be a gap between actual use case and the research.

[@Sophia-bq2sp]

This man has a perfect understanding of artificial intelligence, both its benefits and dangers. Therefore, I believe he should be the primary decision-maker and regulator for future advancements in artificial intelligence worldwide.

[@gumbypokey]

another bright idea you can keep to yourself....

[@Peter-rw1wt]

There is a problem with AIs that I have not heard anyone mention. They have developed from the conceptual system to which we have delegated understanding, in our pursuit of efficiency. This system has been very effective, but the problem is that we need to remain aware, in real time, that it is only modelling, and not real. If our language system becomes real to us, then we will respect the validity of space and time as contextual to our lives, and we will regard sentience only conceptually. This is a big problem, because it means we have conflated efficiency and intelligence, which is the same as conflating sanity with senility.

[@yaseenyahya]

Ah yes, Yuval Harari the same madman who said something in the lines of: "One day we'll use AI to hack the human essence and they'll be soulless"

[@Skochel]

Sounds like both things he’s said/is saying are valid and should be looked at. Dont be so sensitive

[@KevinMakins]

His utopia is my dystopia.

[@undrsonr5316]

@@Skochel not valid. check orch/or theory (18 proofs already). consciousness manifestations comes with ultrasound orchestration in micro-tubules and that is not computable (as roger penrose realized)... Harari is a sci-fi dystopian former historian... he sells an agenda against decentralization and human fractal localism.

[@estuchedepeluche2212]

People are outsourcing their thoughts to AI for writing, soon they will start doing that for reading, and bots will be writing text for other bots to read while humans will get worse at writing and more illiterate.

[@NoahNobody]

I do have great conversations with AI. I really don't have a problem accelerating AI integration in our lives.

[@eduardotorresbetancourt654]

This guy is with the WEF lot, so whatever he says, even if partly true, should be taken as irrelevant, he's got an agenda. The truth shall set you free!

If anyone ever thought the devil was no real, just take a look at this guy!

[@OlympischbriesjeNadaAverage]

The beauty of human is that we die, saint or evil ... the top player dies and make space for next generations. AI will give a fuck and once op top of the game, it will never give up the top position and eat all resources to stay on top.