Also, your telling of the Niels Bjorgum story is hilarious. I know you don't intend to be a comedian but your delivery can be perfect. I just about lost it when you got to, "Neither one of these barrels is for a cartridge that actually exists...which is a problem..."
@donweatherwax93182 жыл бұрын
11:15 "with your _third_ hand" . . . lol
@draknor7730 Жыл бұрын
The one ring pistol, when he says "if you can't successfully kill yourself, it's probably not dangerous" had me rolling.
@VonGrav8 жыл бұрын
It was kinda hilarious to translate the source material xD Best letter in the whole thing: "The factory has by now for over a year developed a countless amount of parts. These will be very instructive to illustrate what one with skilled workers and modern machines can make out of steel, but the factory has other and better use of its machines and people than making such weirdness.."
@dobiem18 жыл бұрын
Very insightful. Tragic that there was no public request to develop a service pistol through some announcement in Norway if it was really such a desired and necessary item. It would have been interesting to see some of the other alternatives that might have been built.
@VonGrav8 жыл бұрын
There was a public request. They set up a competition. there was a few competitors iirc.
@dobiem18 жыл бұрын
VonGrav Ah, thanks and thats good for future interest then. Are their examples included within the book Ian discussed?
@VonGrav8 жыл бұрын
My bad "Colt, browning, parabellum, roth, mannlicher and mauser" Are mentioned. It was mentioned during the testing of Bjørgums m/1911 version that there was also 3 other Norwegian designs tested. But the names are not mentioned. I suppose one has to dig into the actual reports to find those.
@dobiem18 жыл бұрын
VonGrav Thanks very much :)
@Lazyguy227 жыл бұрын
This man had the earnest hopelessness that every British person dreams of having.
@rousp8 жыл бұрын
I am Norwegian and have spent some time now reading trough our parliment logs from this period (1903-1937). I am absolutely stunned that you have this information. How do you research this? Some additional information: Niels Bjoergum (Norwegian: Nils Bjørgum) recieved funding in 1905 to produce 3 prototype pistols and 3 prototype selfloading rifles. Actually he recieved funding twice as he spent the first funding without completing anything. He was closed down at Kongsberg in 1915 due to the first world war and funded his endevours trough his private company during the war. The intention was that one would consider to commence production once a normal situation at the factory returned. From this point on there is no mention of the pistols as I have found, they were probably deemed useless. However the prototype selfloading rifles have been mentioned a lot. As the war drew to a close Nils tried to get back into the factory but a technical committe deemed that no results had been produced so far and shut the project down. By 1920 Nils had pleaded to the parliament to overturn the decision. Here it is noted that a millitary committee argued that due to the large investment of public money thrown into the project, one should throw more money at it until it gave results. Nils must have made some really good friends in that committee. The parliament decided to trust the technical committees decision and did not overturn their decision to stop the project. I found evidence as late as 1937 where Nils again tried to commence work on his selfloading rifle, so he obviously didnt forget his past as a.. well.. his past attempt at beeing a gun designer..
@josuelservin24098 жыл бұрын
More sketchy than a Chinese mystery pistol, that's kind of impressive XD
@legobuchseTV8 жыл бұрын
yeah chinese browning-mauser-fn pistols atleast look like they could function :D
@ComissarZhukov8 жыл бұрын
Yu mean the mauser mauser mauser brevet pistols? xD
@prestonhenson2637 жыл бұрын
CommissarZhukov I think id prefer the Wauser...
@baileyreynolds4612 жыл бұрын
@@legobuchseTV chairman Maoser? 🥁
@j.murphy48848 жыл бұрын
So basically, the "safety" on this thing, is actually more dangerous then not having a safety? This thing is an example of why the Chinese Mystery Pistols aren't actually that bad.
@jackandersen12626 жыл бұрын
It’s not a safety. That’s the delaying mechanism in the gun.
@art0707695 жыл бұрын
That safety was the more ridiculous thing I've seen in a while. I was more of a surprise trigger than a safety.
@Grimmwoldds5 жыл бұрын
@@art070769 He was ahead of his time(as an artist). The perfect setup for a "happy little accident".
@jerkfudgewater1473 жыл бұрын
It’s actually just a “Snooze button”
@Ezekiel_Allium3 жыл бұрын
@@jackandersen1262 manually delayed blowback is the best operation, actually
@Kumimono8 жыл бұрын
It really feels like there's something missing from the back of the pistol. A cover, something to keep the action from sliding when reloading. Him having presented incomplete guns for actual trials, I would not be surprised... But I do applaud the desire to make something of his own, and not just settle for... perfectly working solutions. Well.
@sdlonyer8 жыл бұрын
I had the same thought... images of cartridges sliding off the the side rather than seating in the chamber flashed by :-)
@The1Helleri8 жыл бұрын
You know it's the worst of the worst when you can't even throw it at someone and injure them.
@S0renz3 жыл бұрын
"It ain't a gun unless it weighs at least a hundred pounds!"-Gunner, Deep Rock Galactic.
@MrLoobu8 жыл бұрын
If at first you don't succeed, try and try again untill you waste all your money.
@mannyowlstein81448 жыл бұрын
At least he was smart enough to waste other people's money first.
@Boeing_hitsquad8 жыл бұрын
try until you make it.. or can convincingly fake it!
@MrLoobu8 жыл бұрын
+Manny Owlstein A true Trumpian perspective.
@Boeing_hitsquad8 жыл бұрын
*****... queue eyeroll
@Boeing_hitsquad8 жыл бұрын
well that's just wrong ... in more ways than one... "accept"
@kbjerke6 жыл бұрын
Just found this video! Glad to see a "forgotten" piece of Norwegian history, no matter how sad the firearm turned out to be. At least, he TRIED! Thank you, Ian!
@seaofcleverness8 жыл бұрын
This is admittedly a nerdy thing that only I'm into; but I would be interested in the history of stripper clips, speed loaders, etc. I think the evolution of reloading tech would be cool.
@ForgottenWeapons8 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/fWTdgpVpgL-jhK8
@seaofcleverness8 жыл бұрын
Thanks! I should have known you had something already. I guess after all the hours I have spent watching Forgotten Weapons I missed this one.
@sqTake28 жыл бұрын
I am an artist as well and many of the vintage handguns Ian has covered are *beautiful* extensions of human capacity. This one is not and I am very interested in seeing Niels' paintings as well. Keep these videos coming! they are fascinating.
@Ass_of_Amalek Жыл бұрын
funny that it took a painter to make a gun this ugly, seemingly lacking any aesthetic considerations, huh?
@Soabac2 жыл бұрын
so cool you got help from norwegian viewers !! i'm watching you from france and i just wanna tell you, you're videos are always a good time, interesting, and pretty relaxing! keep it up :)
@andyrihn18 жыл бұрын
Ian: the norwegians adopted the colt 1911 which is a great pistol... 1911 fanboy: hell yeah Ian: ...for the time period 1911 fanboy: *triggered*
@SearTrip8 жыл бұрын
Donna Sachs Not being any kind of fan boy, but the P-51 analogy won't fly, so to speak. The world's best pilot in a P-51 isn't going to get anywhere near a modern fighter aircraft to even try to have a fair fight. Somebody who knows how to use a 1911, OTOH, can easily still win a handgun fight with someone armed with the most 'modern' pistol. Being outdated is a relative thing.
@genericpersonx3338 жыл бұрын
Obsolescent would be the more accurate term. Obsolete implies it would not be a viable service weapon at all in the present age whereas obsolescent suggests that there are better alternatives available today but it would still give a very good account of itself. Personally, I don't think it is even obsolescent. There is really nothing about a 1911a1 that is seriously limiting compared to "modern" handguns.
@classifiedad18 жыл бұрын
Well, compared to anything modern, the M1911 does seem a bit obsolete. It's big, has a low ammunition capacity, is single action, and heavy. I didn't mention anything about the ammunition, as many modern pistols use .45 ACP. However, it has excellent ergonomics and a solid locking system, which is copied on virtually every modern pistol.
@therideneverends16978 жыл бұрын
Really its only practical drawback is its limited magizine capasity, which for millitary application, is an easy thing to fix. USMC just readopted a m1911 variant with a double stack magizine
@classifiedad18 жыл бұрын
Andre Krumins I don't think so. There's the MEU(SOC) pistol, which is basically modernized M1911A1 frames from 1945. Same basic design.
@WolfPawArmoury8 жыл бұрын
At first I thought that was a single shot
@exploatores8 жыл бұрын
I got a "what the hell am I looking at" moment.
@elitearbor8 жыл бұрын
No kidding! That was surprising.
@WolfPawArmoury8 жыл бұрын
A survivor I can't stand him.
@WolfPawArmoury8 жыл бұрын
wild bill I'll be waiting for that day.
@WolfPawArmoury8 жыл бұрын
wild bill Saw his slam fire shotgun. never in my life have I cringed so hard at a gun video.
@exploatores8 жыл бұрын
his thought wasn´t in the box, It wasn´t even in the house the box was in.
@exploatores8 жыл бұрын
SonsOfLorgar he wasn´t that far of, it goes boom, most of the times and the bulit goes in the right general direction.
@exploatores8 жыл бұрын
SonsOfLorgar I have seen worst, It might be on the top ten list of the worst. but at least no Norweigan fells hurt and try to explain that it´s good somehow. for a Norwegian semiauto pistol.
@Nordic_Shooting8 жыл бұрын
Exploatores true. I'm from Norway very true
@superkjell8 жыл бұрын
Thank you, cool video. As a Norwegian, I find it really fascinating to find unknown pieces of our history. Just one small detail: Niels is the Danish spelling. The Nowegian spelling is Nils.
@donweatherwax9318 Жыл бұрын
I think there's a fairly simple explanation as to why Bjorgum, an artist by training and experience, thought he could just switch to another field, an engineering field, and expected to be able to contribute. It was the 1890s. Norway got their telegraph system going nationwide by 1870, and as a result, Norwegians were undergoing the profound changes that are always triggered by the introduction of the telegraph - suddenly, instant communication over unthinkable distances is a thing. Bjorgum had been professionally active since the 1880s. He had seen these remarkable changes. He knew their cause: the telegraph. And he knew, undoubtedly, who was generally regarded in Europe as the main inventor of the telegraph: an American, Samuel Morse. An American _artist_ named Samuel Morse. Who, having already established himself as an artist - just as Bjorgum had done in Norway, only more so - decided, in 1833, that now he was an inventor, and electrical engineer, and he was going to invent a working telegraph. And, arguably, proceeded to do exactly that. Why _wouldn't_ Bjorgum think he had a shot? He clearly had a very high opinion of his own ingenuity. And it was very much the spirit of the age.
@rogerwilco28 жыл бұрын
Thanks for another nice story. It's why I watch this channel.
@ericswain708 жыл бұрын
me too.
@Marnox8 жыл бұрын
Great content. As a norwegian I really enjoyed your take on this part of our history.
@NickBebs8 жыл бұрын
Probably the best Ian`s video, i`m rewatching it for the third time.
@Liam-B8 жыл бұрын
This pistol is *truly* a work of art.
@vthegoose3 жыл бұрын
I give him credit for trying, but holy mother of god that’s a scary gun
@steinskotmyr21943 жыл бұрын
Being a Norwegian I am quite embarrassed that something that flimsy and bad came out of Kongsberg Arms. It looks like mr. Bjorgum has worked in a corner of his own and not taking any help or advice from anyone who worked at the Kongsberg Arms.
@sidekickbob72273 жыл бұрын
Nothing to be embarrassed for. Bjørgum did his best, and there's no stamps from Kongsberg våpenfabrikk (as far as I could see), so they did not approve it on any way. The gun commision tested it as little as possible, but still enough to satisfy the government. And by the way, if you look at the later stuff Kongsberg våpenfabrikk made, then you can start to be embarrassed. No finesse at all.
@jackmcslay8 жыл бұрын
looks like scaramanga's golden gun without the gold
@blogobre8 жыл бұрын
.. and without the gun
@siestatime46388 жыл бұрын
A locking bolt zip gun? Whoever fired it 50 times is WAY braver (or foolhardy) than I.
@mysss298 жыл бұрын
sixteen. ...presumably someone tested it before that...although judging by the 1914 one...I'm probably giving the operation too much credit.
@cracklingvoice8 жыл бұрын
I honestly don't know how they got through the effort of loading 16 rounds, much less firing 16 rounds through what looks like the most fragile handgun ever made.
@elfinfluff8 жыл бұрын
At least it wasn't 3D printed?
@thegoldencaulk27428 жыл бұрын
I checked in my Kongsberg-Colten book, and it only refers to the 1905 as "Bjørgum's pistol." So I guess he never gave it a designation. It's amazing that this... thing tried to compete with modern handguns. In fact, all of the Norwegian designs are pretty amazing in that regard. Stick to rifles, Norway. You're good at those.
@ZucchiniSlayer5 жыл бұрын
Bjorgum, probably: "Its so light weight and so few pieces to malfunction!" Parliament: "Oh you mean the pieces that makes it functional? Those pieces?"
@judgebigmansion34923 жыл бұрын
We need a Forgotten Weapons multiplayer shooter that uses all this weird stuff.
@rickautry27595 жыл бұрын
My god, I could just feel that cover plate removing the webbing between my thumb and trigger finger. That's some fearsome pistol, but not to the enemy. On another point, I'd love to see Ian putting together a few episodes of 'Fugazi Weapons'...
@endlesstime49118 жыл бұрын
Thank you Ian for the great video and a special thanks for those norwegian guys!
@shawnc19368 жыл бұрын
Well that's a pretty depressing gunmaker story.
@blogobre8 жыл бұрын
ROFL. I bet that's how most of the gun makers ended, broke.
@nordicnostalgia81068 жыл бұрын
I don't know. Was a little happy to me. He got to have fun and just went back painting when he couldn't get any more funding.
@ericshuler63008 жыл бұрын
"Its a happy box" "He did not want to be in the box"
@maralangley88067 жыл бұрын
The sad thing is that I understand the mindset here. An artist comes into contact with pistols and gets an idea of the aspects of automatic pistols without understanding the nuances to their engineering. Delaying mechanisms like rotating barrels and locking lugs but no real concept of pressure and kinetic energy. In other words he was very interested in designing things and seeing them machined to life. In another world, Bjorgum may have made some excellent kinetic sculptures had he taken the time and investment to learn how to machine.
@dmanx5004 жыл бұрын
Oh god this is like me *Sad noises* I'll never create anything.....
@pilot778spartan38 ай бұрын
It’s kinda tragic isn’t it
@higfny4 жыл бұрын
Full name: Nils Josefson Bjørgum. He was also editor av a newspaper and in what would be the equivalent of the state /"fylke" in Norwegian) leadership of a Norwegian political party (Venstre, meaning "left", but actually in the centre of Norwegian politics. At that time the largest party, now a small party). That would propbably explain why he got someone in the parlament (Stortinget) to fund his guns.
@Sheehy2238 жыл бұрын
This looks like something a small child would come up with if you told them to draw a picture of a gun.
@planescaped6 жыл бұрын
Looks like a gun some guy in Compton made in his garage.
@elektro30008 жыл бұрын
I find this fascinating sort of as a counterpart to the various Asian hand-made "mystery" and "counterfeit" pistols. Whereas you have rightly pointed out that, given an example pistol (or multiple examples of different models) it is both fascinating and impressive to see how a skilled metalworker can use only the most rudimentary tools to build something that is almost a pistol. In this case, we have a man who had all of the machining equipment and skilled workers available, but instead of starting with an example pistol to copy, started from scratch and did all of the engineering himself without the benefit of any engineering training or experience. And he DID, in fact, create a pistol, that DID appear to have worked a majority of the time, at least within the extremely small "service life" it had. Now of course, "a majority of the time" is not at all enough for a successful pistol, but it demonstrates that he actually engineered a mechanism that fundamentally did what it was supposed to, without being an engineering in any way, shape, or form. I find that fascinating.
@AlphaChinoz8 жыл бұрын
Amazing presentation and video in general. So well organized, told and your pronounciation is GREAT for the Norwegian names. Respected, liked and subbed ;)
@ThomasRonnberg8 жыл бұрын
he might have not been a successful gun designer, but he really did think outside the box and introduce some rather clever ideas. It would be cool to see how a group of engineers would build this concept into a functional design.
@adammanning88825 жыл бұрын
“It’s a happy box” - Ian... my new favorite quote
@headhunter89meyer744 жыл бұрын
I live in Norway and I can confirm that this inbreed looking pistol is indeed something a mind of a norwegian could come up with
@LJVolkov217 жыл бұрын
After watching this, I feel like I need to go watch a video about the 1911 so I can remember what "normal" looks like.
@olaolesn31774 жыл бұрын
That gun is the only one known, and I'm happy to say it is home again now.
@gotharion8 жыл бұрын
"It's a happy box" XDDDD ... I love all the vids Ian does, but little gems like this take it twice as awesome :D
@herptyderp49278 жыл бұрын
The history on this page is incredible. As a historian it opens my mind to new topics of research
@bilbo_gamers6417 Жыл бұрын
this is like a real life elbonia story lmao
@elneutrino908 жыл бұрын
He tried to DaVinci but couldn't, but honestly these awful attempts make me wanna try my hand at gun designing.
@tranq458 жыл бұрын
elneutrino90 : He at least took a good hard stab at his dreams.
@elneutrino908 жыл бұрын
+tranq45 My phrase sounded harsher than I wantedd it to, but you're right that his story was inspiring.
@tranq458 жыл бұрын
elneutrino90 : Yes. He certainly had courage to try, and that counts for a lot. I think I would stick to single-shot long guns, myself.
@MatthewBaileyBeAfraid5 жыл бұрын
This guy was freaking insane to think it would work. It doesn’t look like it would "field strip" at all, and would probably need three people to disassemble.
@darthpanzer8 жыл бұрын
This gun is a Bork/10.
@daviddonnelly27004 жыл бұрын
Super interesting pistol and video. Thanks Ian.
@GunFunZS7 жыл бұрын
A buddy in parliament was the kickstarter of a hundred years ago. All you need is an improbable promise, and a nice artistic rendering.
@WinterCedar8 жыл бұрын
Honestly, its really interesting to see what kind of ideas people come up with when they don't know the basics. That might be the most fascinating train wreak of a gun I've ever seen.
@coachronb98025 ай бұрын
Hope you enjoyed your visit to the recent Elverum shoot!
@sjoormen18 жыл бұрын
That really made my day. Thanks.
@Smygolf12348 жыл бұрын
Thanks for bringing us this story Ian, I laughed out loud several times of the absurdity of this Niels character and his experimental solutions within gun design :)
@moosemaimer7 жыл бұрын
So the gun fires as soon as you put the safety to "fire?" Are we sure this guy didn't end up at Remington, working on the 700?
@Raekken14 жыл бұрын
Ore the SPAS 12?
@americanpatriot23107 жыл бұрын
In my opinion the back story of this pistol is more interesting than the pistol itself
@VegasCyclingFreak8 жыл бұрын
That is quite bizarre... but it utilizes some interesting ideas
@kebman7 жыл бұрын
Pretty good Norwegian pronounciation! I have now named the pistol. I hereby dub it "The Cooperation Pistol" because you need three hands...
@primalabe91907 жыл бұрын
6:02 Wait a sec... 10.15 mm cartridge did actually exist and was used in Norway and Sweden around that time period... but that 10.15x61mmR was designed for rifles. Was Bjorgum seriously such a nutcase that he'd fire one of those bad boys outta PISTOL? 10.15x61mmR slings out 21,85 grams (337 grain) projectile with muzzle velocity of 500 m/s (1640 fps). That's stronger than .50 Action Express, the biggest shot you can use on Desert Eagle!
@kebabsvein13 жыл бұрын
Haneviks book suggests there was supposed to be a top cover to the design to make it less funny looking. Also reading through Kongsberg-colten. He said in 2003 that no version of Bjorgums pistol was known to exist, but voila Gun Jesus finds one....
@stephenwoods41188 жыл бұрын
Now that is a Forgotten Weapon, deservedly so.
@KekilandF1nnB0mbr8 жыл бұрын
Now this is a truly forgotten weapon.
@de.50668 жыл бұрын
Love these type of videos Keeps it up
@TheErilaz8 жыл бұрын
Lieutenant Ole Herman Johannes Krag had a hand in these trails, he also did design a pistol that underwent trials. He was a fan of the big bores,so something around 11 millimeters was required.
@NoahSpurrier Жыл бұрын
This is a weapon that deserves to be forgotten. That safety design says it all.
@DoRC8 жыл бұрын
Its amazing that this wackiness and the 1911 were being designed at the same time.
@LoreliaDeMildiane8 жыл бұрын
A big thank you to the two Vikings that made this video possible! It was really interesting!
@bengarrison98578 жыл бұрын
"he did not want to be in the box" LMAO hilarious ending
@TheLawnWanderer8 жыл бұрын
Refined and made with modern materials this type of gun would be kinda cool imo.
@exploatores8 жыл бұрын
i don´t Think you can save this gun Construction.
@BruceForte8 жыл бұрын
I'm really happy to know that my country had experimental weaponry of our own.
@KnifeChatswithTobias8 жыл бұрын
What a crazy concept for a pistol.
@Riceball018 жыл бұрын
The best thing that I can say about that gun is that it's better than I could have done and considering I don't know anything about designing guns that really isn't saying much. But there is one thing that I know I could have done better and that's the safety, I would have definitely made a safety that doesn't cause the hammer to drop when taken off safe. However, considering his lack of firearms knowledge, and probably usage as well, maybe it was intentional because he thought that it would be a good idea. Maybe he thought that it would allow the user to get a shot off faster, remove the gun from your holster, aim, take the gun off of safe, and BANG, you've just fired your first shot without spending time pulling the trigger.
@dicedoomkid Жыл бұрын
Very interesting to see different stuff like this
@jimh67633 жыл бұрын
"Its a garbage fire"!!! Thats great Ian!
@calvingreene905 жыл бұрын
You only put the "safety" on when surrendering hoping your gun fights on.
@XSpamDragonX8 жыл бұрын
Can't wait for DICE to confirm this gun for the first Battlefield 1 DLC. A gun that existed before WWI? Clearly it should be in the game.
@Orvtrebor8 жыл бұрын
Where others see a failed design, I see a man going all in with a passion. It didn't work out for him, but you have to give him credit for trying.
@lucianene77414 жыл бұрын
There is nothing wrong in principle with this idea. Rotating barrels are used to this day day in a number of successful designs, I'll cite the Russian GSh-18 destined for special forces. What poor Bjorgum did not understand is that he needed a heavy slide /bolt that could store enough recoil energy to cycle the gun reliably, not that flimsy sliding lid over the magazine. It was an easy fix to his design, but apparently even the folks he was working with at Kongsberg did not know any better and were probably offended by having to work for this amateur. At the end of the day, I like people who follow their dreams and passions even if the chances of success are slim. I'll check his paintings.
@lucianene77414 жыл бұрын
I could not find any painting. Looks like, apart from being the opposite of Frommer, he was also the opposite of Van Gogh: successful during his lifetime, totally forgotten after.
@PatFarrellKTM8 жыл бұрын
Very cool video, nice job explaining the very strange pistol
@oddspaghetti42878 жыл бұрын
There are some really interesting concepts in this gun but as you said it is very clear why this didn't work.
@amiirwhite25528 жыл бұрын
I really loved the story part. What a guy this Bjorgum haha yet I respect his pursuit. Would have loved to see a picture of his face but couldn't find any
@JerryEricsson6 жыл бұрын
Perhaps you have visited the Dakota's, if not, I should explain a bit if tradition that is followed up here. You may be aware, the Dakota's were settled by primarily folks from Scandinavia and Germany. So it goes that the prejudices of those peoples came across the sea with them as they came to seek a better life in America. Dad was a full blood Swede, and very proud of it. In fact until he reached the 6th grade in school, he spoke only Swedish, both at home and in the Swedish school that was down the road from the farm where he was raised. Then when he moved to a new school, he was forced to learn English. This being back in the 1910's, Dad used to make fun of the Norwegians all the time, the Norwegian jokes were on the same line as th old Polish jokes else where in the USA back in those times. So Dad was quite taken aback when I married a half Norwegian girl but she did manage to pass on by since the other half was German, and dad had married a German girl so in fact I was half German, half Swede. I grew up never knowing if I should remain neutral or go to war with my enemies! All that said, this gun comes as no surprise to me, and I thank God that my wife is half German herself so she doesn't come up with some of the idiocy that the full Norwegians come up with (just joking, of course since now days such a premise is frowned upon everywhere) Mom's second husband was a full blood Norwegian, he used to always respond to my Norse comments with "20 thousand swedes running through the weeds," in reference to the war where Norway overthrew Sweden who was holding Norway as a colony of sorts. Now don't get me wrong, there was never really any hatred involved, even back in the day it was all done in a joking manner, the only ones who really fought over such things were all the Norse descendants and for some strange reason, the Irish.
@MaaveMaave8 жыл бұрын
So cool. That sliding dust cover and tiny hammer remind me of George Wilson's .45 prototype
@thomasanderson32048 жыл бұрын
Hey Ian have you ever thought about making a video about your collection of rare and/or forgotten weapons? Could make for an interesting episode of FW. Thanks for the great content and keep up the good work!
@SCmedic286668 жыл бұрын
Is the barrel warped, or is just the lack of finish, reflection, and shadow?
@ForgottenWeapons8 жыл бұрын
Optical illusion; the barrel is straight.
@tacticalmanatee4 жыл бұрын
Elbonia needs this guy to help them with their arms programs
@ZerokillerOppel15 жыл бұрын
That part on the backflat when it slides out is kindof remeniscent of an interrupted thread breach block of an old naval gun.
@TheWhoamaters2 жыл бұрын
His spirit later went on to be one of the more competent members of the SA80/L85 design committee
@DevDreCW7 жыл бұрын
I cant believe that thing is a finished gun! holy shit. I thought you were showing us some early unfinished model with some missing parts. Jesus. This guy was an artist and that was his design? lol
@karigreyd28087 жыл бұрын
I have alot of respect for people like that. persistence is important lol
@TrinidadJamesWoods7 жыл бұрын
this redefines the term "safety". there should be two settings: "Fire", and "Marginally Safe".
@Nordic_Shooting8 жыл бұрын
I will easily buy the book. I'm from Norway 👍👍👍👍
@crbielert5 жыл бұрын
It's pretty interesting anecdotally. I've seen zip guns that inspire more confidence though.
@Shipmaster09 Жыл бұрын
Me seeing the title: bruh wat da heeeeeeck
@randompanda8768 жыл бұрын
Reminds me of those rubber band guns with the gear at the back you see at giftshops on vacation
@williamgson40558 жыл бұрын
That safety is terrifying
@johnsamu8 жыл бұрын
It was probably only capable of being fully loaded ONCE with 2 stripper clips. After firing 16 rounds the barrel and other components would have worn out. So in fact it's a very modern gun; it was the first "dispose_after_use" gun (But probably it wasn't intended this way).
@magnusskipton70673 жыл бұрын
People: blocks are the ugliest handgun Bjorgum: HOLD MY BEER! *and pass me the moonshine*
@thisisall50charactersbeing478 жыл бұрын
the inventor is not the only well known former painter to die in 1945