Nice idea. Almost like a hovercraft, but with better maneuverability since we are not completely out of water.
@xtremer0x Жыл бұрын
*grabbing popcorn and waiting for the livestream 1000km challenge
@Foucault2001 Жыл бұрын
Could take quite some time given the Ripple boat has a range of 45 nautical miles (about 83km)
@sharonbraselton4302 Жыл бұрын
solid staye bates 49 nm too 50 nm rangfe
@JustMe-tu5qc Жыл бұрын
Very elegant piece of engineering.
@theaimuse Жыл бұрын
Haha gotta love a heavy norwegian accent. I love my Norwegian brothers and their complete joke of a tone in their language
@JanSevera Жыл бұрын
Very interesting video. Never thought that something like this is possible.
@TriviaChallenge Жыл бұрын
All future boats need this
@propergander8509 Жыл бұрын
The electric boating industry should get together with the Caravan/Camping industry and develop a standard to deliver energy from the boat/caravan into the car so the boat/caravan battery can act as a secondary battery and extend the range while trailering. Because that’s what it will take to keep both alive, but especially caravans while we’re transitioning to EVs Because even as an EV-Enthusiast, I would still rent a combustion car to tow a caravan down to Italy… cause I ain’t stopping every 150km to unhitch the trailer/caravan to charge
@sharonbraselton4302 Жыл бұрын
wrong
@Allebaggen1 Жыл бұрын
Just an input for you Björn, both combustion engine and electric boats (around this size) has crusing speed at around 20 knots or 5 knots, so it is not so unusual that it consume the same amount at higher speed. This is where the boat is most efficient. Because between 8-15 knots (depending on boat size) the boat is starting to planing, and uses way more fuel/nm. Ex our boat (150hp) is running 5knots at around 0,9l/nm and around 1l/nm at 18-25 knots.. So it would be more interesting to know the different in consumption when the fan is off/on in 20 knot cruising speed.
@frankleonard6570 Жыл бұрын
Wow. This is definately a great idea! 👍
@courcheval Жыл бұрын
their consumption is more than 3 times the consumption of the Candela you showed last time. It s a huge difference!
@verygoodbrother Жыл бұрын
However this technology, i believe, is more versatile than the Candela
@courcheval Жыл бұрын
@@verygoodbrother What do you mean by "versatile". What can it do that the Candela couldnt?
@pascaltechnologies Жыл бұрын
@@courcheval Generally, surface effect ships are less weight sensitive than hydrofoils. That means we can carry more batteries and travel approximately the same distance in 20 knots.
@courcheval Жыл бұрын
@@pascaltechnologies so the cost advantage goes to foiling since it needs 3 times less batteries for the same distance at the same speed, doesnt it?
@4literv6 Жыл бұрын
For the same size, weight and powerlevel though? I think this is slightly larger and much heavier vs the candela. What's interesting is ice boats in the candela size and cruising speeds can use 7-10kwh per mile vs just 1kwh per mile. Which matches with candelas claims of about 1/10th the cost to cover the same distance as a similar marine diesel boat costs. 😎
@Rufus2005f1 Жыл бұрын
Very clever idea
@yanassi7 ай бұрын
For the same boat, electric vs this air cushion, the range iincreased by how much? What constant speed produces what range on a given boat?
@flotsamike7 ай бұрын
Back when hydrofoils were the cool thing in the late 60s early 70s someone would have thought of this. Now I wish someone would make a lightweight metal air battery that could be swapped or recharged quickly.
@warrior9086 Жыл бұрын
WOW 126 kWh. This is a floating battery
@ChielvanderHoek Жыл бұрын
cool video. Here in Lund Sweden they have changed most city busses to full electric ones. I would like to know more about them maybe worth a video? :D
@nakfan Жыл бұрын
Great idea 👍
@sharonbraselton3135 Жыл бұрын
Buy eltric bus
@davebennett7550 Жыл бұрын
Would be good for fishing. Nice and quiet so it wouldn’t scare the fish away.
@ruprechtkroenen2665 Жыл бұрын
Brilliant idea 👍👍
@nikitapustovoi8987 Жыл бұрын
Is my math right that consumption is in the ball park of ~2000 wh per km?
@youtubebob123 Жыл бұрын
i got to about the same figure, roughly 0.5km/kwh. That being said though, i looked up consumption on fossil motors, and at 10knots, its about 1 liter per km! Significantly more at higher speeds (for V hulls). So i mean consumption on boats is just ridiculously high.
@jrherita Жыл бұрын
Yes about that. Which oddly is very efficient for boats.
@DigiDriftZone Жыл бұрын
So what does long range mean in this context? - 50km?
@verygoodbrother Жыл бұрын
@@youtubebob123 Not surprising, with cars you have to deal with air and road friction (small contact area). With boats it's air and water, with the contact area with water being very large.
@youtubebob123 Жыл бұрын
@@DigiDriftZone 50-70km, something like that
@ericvet8b Жыл бұрын
Sounds like a good idea!!
@roybm3124 Жыл бұрын
Amazing design
@stane89 Жыл бұрын
Very interesting video!
@kingprone7846 Жыл бұрын
3kwh/nm is quite a bit. 40nm isnt particularly far. Though presumbly it gets more range at slower speeds...
@pascaltechnologies Жыл бұрын
Interesting comment, what would be your expectation for an electric boat?
@kingprone7846 Жыл бұрын
depends on size and purpose of course. I used to be more on sailingyachts and this is of course not an extended trip boat with no cabin. Maybe I am being too harsh.I think if its a proper cruiser with a small cabin and a place to lie down/rest then Id expect 120 - 150nm minimum. I'd personally be more interested in boats which are solar powered with a much smaller battery. @pascaltechnologies
@4literv6 Жыл бұрын
It's half to a third of the cost for a similar marine diesel ice boats consumption and the "fuel" for it is much cheaper to though.
@kingprone7846 Жыл бұрын
im sure the arguments for it are similar to EVs vs gas cars@@4literv6
@sharonbraselton31356 ай бұрын
1990 top 2000 solar jrrc boat 117 NM range 135 mile rsnge
@dcvariousvids8082 Жыл бұрын
Nice and quiet compared to liquid fuelled craft.
@TripWire-7520 күн бұрын
Wow that look like a ruff ride on flat to light chop water. You would be better off moving to Catamaran hull. No need for the fan in the front let the Cat design due its job funneling air under the boat to raise the boat out of the water.
@458italiagtr Жыл бұрын
Do you have a plan to retest an iX xDrive 50 during the summer?
@bjornnyland Жыл бұрын
No
@sharonbraselton3135 Жыл бұрын
Buy it
@sharonbraselton31354 ай бұрын
Buy it
@robertbodnar_ Жыл бұрын
as a man you just gotta love boats
@nroose29 күн бұрын
Still like 10x power usage of a road vehicle on wheels, no?
@PeterHas Жыл бұрын
Banana box test?
@pascaltechnologies Жыл бұрын
We forgot! Coming in the next video :)
@BigKokka Жыл бұрын
So, it became a catamaran?
@pascaltechnologies Жыл бұрын
Like a good mullet! V-hull in the front, catamaran in the back.
@tridrean Жыл бұрын
❤❤❤
@clownbooface262418 күн бұрын
E foil is the only way for boats,
@ojobee Жыл бұрын
So when is the 1000 km test 😂😂
@zerma6 Жыл бұрын
Consumption of those boats are disgusting. 3kwh for 1.85km!
@bjornnyland Жыл бұрын
Consumption for fossil boats are even more disgusting...
@sharonbraselton3135 Жыл бұрын
Wrobg
@dakkedankos4116 Жыл бұрын
Wow.. 300.000 euros... Its a nice boat but a toy for a very few people at that price..
@pascaltechnologies Жыл бұрын
We totally agree, but no one would be happier if marine grade batteries would reach cost parity with car batteries than us!
@4literv6 Жыл бұрын
That's how every tech starts off smh. An apple original computer from the 1980s in today's dollars would be almost 28k for comparison. Thanks to economies of scale and competition an equivelant premium desktop TODAY is about a grand. 😀
@GoldenCroc Жыл бұрын
Thats what "larger" (not that this is very big but, in comparison to a row boat) boats cost sometimes. Considering the EV drivetrain, its about the same ratio as a normal ICE car vs an EV.
@4literv6 Жыл бұрын
@@pascaltechnologies how much more per kwh are marine grade cells vs automotive grade?
@pascaltechnologies Жыл бұрын
the cells themselves are the same, but at pack level the cost is 4-5X car batteries per kWh. Once economy of scale and marine standards are more developed the difference will hopefully reduce fast.