I can't even thank you enough for making these videos. My biology teacher literally has no idea what is going on in the course and our class, so we have done just about nothing all year. I'm watching these videos the day before my exam, and it is the most i have learned all year. Thank you again, and keep making these videos!
@LyricNear7 жыл бұрын
The mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell
@elementalfiery91205 жыл бұрын
Give this man an award
@midnytejay3 жыл бұрын
no way no fucking way
@spiffyspaceace4 жыл бұрын
Seriously, thank you so much. Now in 2020 with all the corona stuff and staying home has been difficult with the transition to online classes, and this makes so much sense now. THANK YOU
@tanyathep15 жыл бұрын
I don't know if you'll ever see this, but thank you so much. :)
@Gohan01365 жыл бұрын
i love you too
@Duessa200013 жыл бұрын
Great video as always. The entymology of the word Eukaryote and Prokaryote... "karyote" means "kernel" (refering to the nucleus) "Eu" means "true" "Pro" means "before" So a Eukaryote is a "true kernel" and a Prokaryote is "before kernel"
@13ccasto11 жыл бұрын
You are the man! Thanks a lot for these videos!!
@jinaloves41534 жыл бұрын
*Only 18* 👇👇👇 191318.loveisreal.ru
@gutenmorgan2063 Жыл бұрын
genetic code - using DNA and RNA as genetic material central Dogma - every part of you is made of proteins and the result of protein action (DNA->RNA->Protein) metabolism - take in oxygen to output CO2 and water. ATP is the energy coinage that all life uses. all life uses glycolysis krebs cycle or oxidative phosphorylation. then they use anaerobic respiration or aerobic respiration.
@0xssff Жыл бұрын
thank you so very much sir ❤
@NB-qx6vr8 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much💙💙
@Gabi-zf2mg5 жыл бұрын
I’m taking AP Bio on FLVS online and the first lesson starts with this and with evolution. I haven’t taken biology honors since freshman year and I’m starting my senior year next Monday. I don’t remember ANYTHING from bio.
@verae765 ай бұрын
bless you
@naiman88705 жыл бұрын
Here from CAC, Mrs Lily
@adream12274 жыл бұрын
Awesome!
@IzzyChannel111 жыл бұрын
Rosalind Franklin is mentioned in another podcast, that talks more about DNA specifically.
@PragyaChawla207610 жыл бұрын
I love this channel.
@faiadalam48437 жыл бұрын
Evolution is the change of allele frequencies over time. I love Bio
@andshejustsmiled9 жыл бұрын
thanks! very helpful
@bwblue2212 жыл бұрын
I agree
@reece3869 жыл бұрын
Mr andddersssonnnnnnnnnn
@macy20584 жыл бұрын
Sucks that I came here from my bio teacher, but this video is pretty decent.
@MissKitty19369 жыл бұрын
Anyone else think that bacteria in the petri dish looked like a palm tree and a sunset beach scene?
@MTGNoobma9 жыл бұрын
Bree Braumberger They drew it to look like that. :y To take advantage of the glowing characteristic.
@jlrlola7 жыл бұрын
any crammers for 2017???
@marcellemonde84227 жыл бұрын
jlrlola here
@discordant85436 жыл бұрын
jlrlola 2018
@muhammadshaheerbalouch62445 жыл бұрын
2019
@Dinoslayah4 жыл бұрын
2020
@eravulgachris12 жыл бұрын
Him = Mr.Anderson up there.
@chocletemilkshards12 жыл бұрын
Lilika has a point. Lots of men, scientists or otherwise, had amazingly spiteful and cruel personalities and are yet are still hailed as amazing people. And, to be honest, rightfully so. Personality shouldn't impugn the magnificence of a person's discovery or great feat/deed, female or otherwise.
@Mario_DiSanto11 жыл бұрын
Mr.Veres I am studying!
@NaijaBbyB11 жыл бұрын
I get your point cause I noticed it too, but all he said was that they got credit, not that it was theirs. He wouldn't be getting to the point of the lesson if he went into that.
@Moony38511 жыл бұрын
In the biology textbook they do credit her though
@lilika0113 жыл бұрын
Would have been nice if you'd credited Rosalind Franklin properly =[
@mayobeans3556 жыл бұрын
Hello wubs that was sent by ms.maher
@alexlee68597 жыл бұрын
Just wondering. In the descriptions, there are all these citations showing it was accessed in 2013. How come the video was uploaded in 2011 tho? Time travel XD.
@lunadreams123love12 жыл бұрын
metabolic pathways=sum of all chemical reactions to life......what does that mean?
@isaackim66623 жыл бұрын
woah im super late hope u still have youtube it means metabolic pathways is what ultimately let forms u, it plays the main role of using dna to creat rna, and rna to make protein.
@elementalfiery91205 жыл бұрын
Sorry guys. I am dropping AP Bio. I don't find this stuff interesting. Tell Oldendorf I say hi! ;)
@eravulgachris12 жыл бұрын
I hear Watson & Crick offered him a HUGE bag of ATP if he only credited them. The love of ATP is the root of all evil.
@lunadreams123love12 жыл бұрын
I don't get metabolic pathways....
@broski25512 жыл бұрын
anyone have notes for this video?
@gavinpruitt71935 жыл бұрын
Dan Idelkope goat
@qreentea7 ай бұрын
i do!
@proofVid10 жыл бұрын
how can you say that with a straight face?@8:57
@SilverCometMedia5 жыл бұрын
Mrs. Hortons class anyone?
@dirtspritestuff58504 жыл бұрын
my science teacher is also called Mr. Andersen weird right
@Chuuya.lovers2 жыл бұрын
My science teacher is also Mr.Andersen-
@theweakestlink70876 жыл бұрын
Mr Palumbo, anyone?
@logansalsano18314 жыл бұрын
who is here because you have to answer questions off this video?
@christinacaudle8333 Жыл бұрын
I am. My teacher had us watch it in class today, and I have to rewatch it to fill out the worksheet on it.
@rhyanuniza10 жыл бұрын
Mr. Vanloo anyone?
@takilyasstewart8 жыл бұрын
is this for collage students cause I'm in middle school and no Mr. man dude I don't know what central dogma is thanks
@Hypothermicwave12 жыл бұрын
i am a pickle
@whitelightning54545 жыл бұрын
ok
@sickkuntz772010 жыл бұрын
OH MY GOD. Does this mean I can glow as a human?
@briseboy8 жыл бұрын
+Sick Kuntz It's a manipulation done by humans. If a cell of yours with ability to reproduce to an extent it can replace others in its tissue sufficiently to be seen, a part of you can glow. Heven't been there yet, but Mr. Anderson may 'splain ontological development and at which points cells have varying potency, you'll understand more about how they made fish or other multicellular eukaryotes glow. They can more easily make a future child glow, or a cancer tumor glow in you, than produce light in your forehead. Besides, we need darkness for the diurnal cycles we require to rest, consolidate , recover. Unless a species (evolution, as Mr. Anderson said, works on populations through selection of characteristics that favor the reproductive fitness of some offspring individual(s) in some way) evolved traits that could confer advantage to some non-diurnal way to respond to the need for response to changes (it's a really complex subject), glowing would lose an individual friends and health, not to mention lifespan. We are sort of a eusocial species, and that is yet more complex to explain, but that means we really need one another more than many species; crazy traits would have to be useful AND attractive. Sometimes what a person THINKS is of value or attractiveness is really not, and that's why those black moths in Manchester had their time on top, but dropped back when black particulate pollution diminished.
@elementalfiery91205 жыл бұрын
Yeah man! Just inject Jellyfish DNA into you!
@emma-xt5iy5 жыл бұрын
Ms. Hill gang?
@lilika0112 жыл бұрын
I'm not saying the video isn't great - which it is - all i'm saying is that he left out a key contributor to science, who was ignored, discriminated against and had her work stolen simply because she was female. It is still difficult to get people to recognise this. Meanwhile, the people who stole her work (Watson and Crick) get all the credit for it. We KNOW this is wrong. We KNOW they stole it, and they are still credited. And it pisses me off just a little. That's all i'm saying.
@elementalfiery91205 жыл бұрын
Go back to tumbler. Never speak in this comments again or I will tell my mom on you.
@bookworm721112 жыл бұрын
Him? That's kind of sad to see you don't even know the gender of Rosalind Franklin.
@domgz14604 жыл бұрын
I farted lol
@MimisBoot5 ай бұрын
mrs kennet 😕
@randyperalta88087 жыл бұрын
Anybody here from Mr P
@JulioHernandez-gt5hs11 ай бұрын
make shorter
@lilika0112 жыл бұрын
Wrong. They were able to come to the conclusion they did because they stole the photo she spent months and months of hard labor on producing, not because they used 'the scientific method'. This photo was of a quality unrivaled at the time - no one else could get pictures like this (and for all her hard work using this process, she developed the cancer that would kill her).