Braking Into Court

[@kaidupree6407]

He was never obligated to fix anything on that car once the transaction was completed

[@beckywilliams5908]

Exactly!!

[@JamieM470]

Her entire case was based on her brakes failing. And she brought zero proof of that even happening. Sigh.

[@BobBlumenfeld]

Well, she brought word of mouth. Isn't that good enough in court?

[@eunicemundy6869]

Give her a break (no pun intended). She's young and trying to do the right thing by getting her education. Obviously he took advantage of her inexperience in purchasing a car

[@aaa-pp]

@@BobBlumenfeld Well, she didn't have EVIDENCE. The Judge don't read minds.

[@BobBlumenfeld]

@@aaa-pp Sorry. I failed to put in a (/snark) tag. Poe's Law bites me again.

[@startpupsinc9758]

That's what the judge said...We know🙄

[@slapaho]

I swear the top three most tried cases on this show are as is used car sales gone wrong, unleashed pit bulls getting out and attacking other dogs and hairstylist disputes. Edit: I totally forgot about tenant/landlord security deposit disputes! Definitely way up there too.

[@alexxs09]

Landlord evictions too

[@ButtonsCasey]

I've seen a lot tenant/landlord cases and also anything sold.. furniture is one.

[@slapaho]

@@alexxs09 ah yes, I forgot those! They upload at least one of those a day on this channel.

[@nicoleh.6352]

Don't forget.. tow truck drivers😄

[@msshug9995]

Dont forget loans betwenn lovers

[@Aceofwolves]

I have had my brakes fail ...it's incredibly terrifying but she doesn't have proof ....at the end of the day....courts need EVIDENCE...

[@hottuna2006]

It's mind boggling how she doesn't understand the necessity of proof of evidence.

[@Lolalenice]

I got sold a truck with bad brakes I don’t know much about cars the sales rep told me it was because our roads were “icy” at the time and because it was snowing I believed him. Turns out I was driving on half a pad, Firestone told me it’s a miracle I didn’t get into an accident . Cost me 600 bucks because I needed new rotors too. I never thought about suing because there was no way I could prove it she should’ve known she needed that

[@Healingwaters]

Where's her police report of this chain reaction accident?

[@kishamyers7905]

As someone who has had their brakes go out, you can feel and HEAR them going out long before they actually go out.

[@jessicamarsh9779]

Exactly. When your breaks go out, they don’t just work one min and the next min they are just gone (unless the break line was cut &/or new breaks are installed & the breaks weren’t pumped before driving, but if that did happen, they would jump pump the breaks til it stopped). I’ve had my breaks go out a TON. I ride my breaks. One year I had to change my break pad twice within 9 months but that had a lot to do with not having my rotors replaced when my husband changed my break pads & he told me I needed new rotors, so that’s my fault.

[@wvrjl]

Usually, that's true. But twice I had the breaks temporarily go out. But afterwards, it was fine. I actually had that happen with two cars; an 80's Mustang and a 70's Cordoba (I loved that car). With the first car, I lucked out when the light turned green. With the second car, I geared down, pulled into a very steep driveway (upwards), then just put it in park. Then it was okay. Neither was my car (they were my mom's cars) so I don't know if anything was done afterwards.

[@magicworld3242]

The plaintiff is lying. I believe she was driving around with no insurance. She caused a car accident. She can't get no insurance money. So, she made up this ridiculous story about her brakes failing. She didn't have any proof at all. Then, she got a nasty attitude when she realized, she wasn't getting any money.

[@latonyasmith4395]

Why would you drive a car if you know the brakes are not good?????

[@kmaldonado8]

I think he tried to do the right thing multiple times.

[@payableondeath9091]

I think so too and this is an example of where with some people you can't do anything right 😂 No matter what they won't be happy

[@lance6391]

Out of guilt.

[@_SevenKay]

@@lance6391 I agree with you, he probably thought she wasn't gonna be persistent

[@justinecorrington4106]

This is one of those cases I honestly do believe he really is a nice guy who wanted to follow ‘customer is always right’. I think he first probably legitimately thought it was a lemon and therefore their fault. But then next car; still tons of problems; that he is fixing for her, without a warranty

[@stevo9421]

She is a liar. She ruined several cars in that accident and it wasn't lost on JM that she didn't have a mechanics report and seemingly no insurance report to provide evidence. She is the last person who should have gotten money and it's probably a long line of court cases she will lose because of the accident she caused

[@3LWSTAN]

No because I spit out my water when she said she bought a car from the barbershop.

[@robbbietheim2096]

Who the hell is buying cars from a barbershop., SMH 😁

[@trekgirl65]

she paid the shop, not the seller. LOL

[@shereesmith6517]

😂

[@janellewilliams7908]

He seemed to be a genuinely nice guy who just wanted to help her get an operable car so she could get to school.

[@payableondeath9091]

she is a spoiled brat

[@tempgirl00711]

Exactly. He was doing her a favor. She's kinda ignorant Abt life. Or just friggin Google that shyt. Lemon law in my state. Cuz these things are usually as is. He owed her nothing. At the end she still didn't learn anything, cuz she's acting entitled. Instead seeing how lucky she actually had it.

[@1967davethewave]

He does seem like a really nice guy but he also seems not to have the demeanor to sell used cars. Used cars break and if you sell them they are as is. He needs to have enough backbone to say "it's yours, you need to fix it yourself".

[@missingchannel]

He's accused of "Braking Bad". That would have been a better name for the case. 🤣

[@IamRexxSeven]

No. He was accused of breaking fast.... Get it? ... Breakfast? lmao. I made a funny!

[@gongzilla527]

I knew she was a bit shady when she was asked by the judge how the accident happened. She skipped right over the question and tried avoiding it at all costs. She was even offering up evidence that wasn't requested!! She tried to avoid the question so bad until the judge asked her a second time. Sorry she had to lose her money like this, but that's just how it goes on these road and in these streets.

[@Aceofwolves]

This is why you get a mechanic BEFORE YOU GIVE MONEY... I'm not giving you a penny until I get it looked at by someone I choose.

[@cmbsr4851]

Exactly

[@sheilae.9670]

Exactly! When my nephew bought a used car 2 years ago, I made sure we had a mechanic go with us to check out the car. We paid the mechanic $150 and I was well worth it.

[@chinaking918]

Exactly and if that’s a problem with the seller go somewhere else.

[@Healingwaters]

1000%

[@PHOENIX1699]

Crookster She was so angry, she made up a whole new word to describe him

[@ms.danamonique5293]

Crookster😂😂😂😂😂

[@sashachitownvillegas6850]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@graduatge105]

I googled the word just to make sure it wasn’t real. Lol

[@lolabunny8601]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@jasminew.5368]

😂😂😂

[@DS-ky9dl]

Before buying a used car have it checked by a mechanic that is not involved with the sale. Don't trust their mechanic or their buddies to give an honest opinion. The defendant seemed to try to help her when I don't think he had to. Buyer beware!

[@Leaa20001]

I don’t believe that the plaintiff got into the accident due to the brakes failing, if the brake light wasn’t on. The defendant tried to fix the problem multiple times, even still tried to get the plaintiff another car after an accident that was most likely her fault. Unfortunately this is something that happens with a lot of older cars, they seem fine at first and then multiple problems arise after awhile...

[@stevepuy1510]

I believe it was her fault not the brakes

[@meechee2too754]

She went in complaining about the brakes. He admitted the brakes weren’t fixed. She has an accident because of faulty brakes. It seems like the brakes may have been an issue.

[@Leaa20001]

@@meechee2too754 no he said the light was on because the parking brake wasn’t fully pushed down... there was never a faulty problem from the breaks except for the emergency.

[@meechee2too754]

@@Leaa20001 that seems abit weird even if she didn’t push the break down all the way. He or his mechanic should of had the sense to. And why feel responsible for something that wasn’t his fault and offer a new car? I don’t think her trying to kill herself to make a statement makes sense.

[@lutherwhitley]

@@meechee2too754 You are right , there was an issue with the brakes, she didn't use them and hit the vehicle in front of her and hit the vehicle hard enough to cause it to hit the car in front of it causing that car to roll forward hitting the car in front of it , so she was obviously speeding.

[@sharonott7513]

When you brake your car, you can tell if they are failing before you have a 5-car pileup.

[@ilsl04]

An 03 Dodge Intrepid...... You are lucky it made it down the street. Arguably one of the worse cars ever built

[@jasonmccann8023]

I agree. Terrible ass 2.7 liter engine.

[@MrAllan9]

They should have checked her phone when the accident happened, lots of people text while they drive.

[@ahelms1990]

As soon as the plaintiff walks out of court she goes insane and calls him names. She's butt hurt she lost bahahhaa.

[@ljschannel2768]

🤣

[@David-cc8xe]

She could not get it in writing because it just not true. She just crashed.

[@Channel-JJ]

Dude is a multi-tasking entrepreneur. Selling cars out of a barber shop he's invested in. I hear he sells weave hair and socks out of a falafel cart he's invested in as well as selling Lewy Vitton bags and Rolecks watches from a magazine stand.

[@scorpio3390]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@susanstribe4914]

😹😹😹😹😹😹

[@camarojai6832]

I’m done 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@Jaleesa4]

Say what?! 😂🤣😂🤣

[@Stressless2023]

Magazine stands still exist? People still read magazines??? lmao

[@maraebrynda4755]

A simple police report would say whether or not there were tire marks before she rear ended the person in front of her

[@WheresHerb]

99% of the time there is some sort of warning that Brakes are going bad. They won't fail out of nowhere. Especially all 4.

[@kittyfan]

that company needs to fire this guy if he's going to give customers their money back in "as is" sales.

[@guccilady1017]

There’s no company lol 😂

[@brandonhall4547]

I only believe her because those Dodge Intrepids had more problems than an algebra book

[@charliejames2474]

He was led to believe that the brakes failed and he tried to do the right thing. If the brakes really failed then there would have been paperwork saying so and she would have been flashing it all over. She didn't prove the brakes failed so he isn't responsible.

[@0207khenry]

I died when he said he wasn’t a barber!!! Tommy!!! You ain’t got no jobbbb!!!😂

[@generationalcursebreaker5397]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@sashabenoit1518]

That chick with the red hat behind Harvey is a whole mood! 😂

[@YarnCrafts4lefties]

Just started watching... If Harvey asks "who's the worse driver; men or women?" I will scream lol. I keep waiting for the day someone tells him "I think that's a sexist question which you really need to stop asking."

[@TopherGrant]

Harvey; Who takes advantage of who more? Men/women landlords/tenants mechanics/women (Any word ending in-er)? I hardly knew her! I love dogs

[@jo-annbastings]

@@TopherGrant yeaaaaahhh……dogs are the best😉!

[@Daydream355]

LMAO

[@bethc9242]

@@TopherGrant that whole “he hardly knew her” crap pushes me right over the edge LOL. It has annoyed me for YEARS!!!!!

[@DavidKen878]

How is that a sexist question?

[@apolloniaaskew9487]

If the brake light is on in a car that I want to purchase, I would say GOODBYE!! If you don't know about cars, BRING YOUR OWN MECHANIC before you buy!!! Don't trust the dealer's mechanic.

[@danbasford7456]

I've had the brakes lock up on me while on the highway, but only once and the back wheels only. Thankfully it didn't cause an accident but nearly caused one in my pants. 😉 I've never had my brakes just fail completely for no reason and no prior warning.

[@MaxineRae832]

😆

[@lolabunny8601]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@Djkommode]

Let me guess no inspection upon purchase and no warranty promised. Case closed.

[@dspenderella9671]

She brought written proof and audio proof that he agreed to pay her back, and he was even honest enough to admit it, & the judge still dismissed it. She should've had a mechanic write up that it was brake failure, but knowing Milian she'd probably claim it was just a mechanic she knows lying for her the way she goes by what she thinks & feels when she wants to (e.g., her feeling like he was just a nice guy feeling guilty, so that's why he agreed to pay)... Regardless of his reasons, if he agreed, then that shouldn't have been ignored.

[@amberkumar4514]

Absolutely not. This girl is obviously taking advantage of him and the situation. I do think it’s out of ignorance, but I believe she just got in a car accident and is trying not to take responsibility. There is no other reason to come to court without evidence that the brakes failed.

[@dspenderella9671]

@@amberkumar4514 That's your opinion, which has absolutely NOTHING to do with my opinion, so it should be on your own comment thread instead of under mine. You're ASSuming/speculating out of your own ignorance of what actually took place considering you actually weren't there. I'm judging the FACTS presented, which is that the SAME way he can take her money acting as an agent is the SAME way he can reimburse her money acting as an agent...If he agreed to pay in writing, then regardless of you and the judge's personal feelings - he should be held to his written agreement he admitted to in court. The only contracts judges can't uphold are those that are illegal (e.g., written agreement on an illegal drug deal, or loan sharking where someone agrees to pay 60% interest back considering it's illegal to charge more than 20% interest, etc) but this wasn't illegal...He had an obligation to find out if her brakes failed BEFORE he agreed to reimburse her; that's on him if he didn't. We will NOT agree on this. You can't convince me otherwise, & I don't care to convince you or anyone else of anything, hence why I don't jump up under other people's comments trying to counter their opinion as if they give af what I think or it will change what they think...

[@dspenderella9671]

Fyi: I'm sure the plaintiff is a full grown woman and not a "girl".

[@marleonetti7]

i think the judge thought she would use a verdict in her favor to show her insurance and the other people's insurance she hit to use as a way to get out of liability for the accident .

[@dspenderella9671]

@@marleonetti7 Maybe she was thinking that, but that's why it's faulty to rule based on biased thoughts, opinions, & feelings. A judge could think a plaintiff will gamble away any winnings but if they brought evidence, then it still needs to be used. This is civil court, not criminal, so the burden of proof isn't nearly as stringent. She was being biased based on feeling sorry for the defendant who she saw as "the nice guy".

[@virgo7956]

The defendant really tried to help her. Those cars were As-is!!

[@tommyjones6866]

She knows she was on the phone and didn't see the car in front of her had stopped. She never hit them damn brakes.

[@Mimi197-f2z]

AS IS!!! Y DO PLEOPLE THINK THEYRE SPECIAL???

[@Mimisof4]

Right!!!!

[@nathang7935]

Lmao a mechanic told her that the breaks failed but didn’t bring in the proof of that? 💀 bruh

[@isaidwhatisaid2750]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 she was big mad. Why didn't she go through her insurance🤔. She was on her phone and wreaked her car in 9 days. Poor tink tink.

[@monaeeuniquee2534]

Honestly it doesn't matter if she brought the proof she brought a legal contract a contract can be written in text and it can be written on paper as long as the other party signs it so I think it's ironic how judges want to pick and choose when an CONTRACT is in effect

[@Fater4511]

It's not a contract if the one party is not getting anything. This is a nice guy "trying to help" someone out.

[@angelmercy5261]

What you are missing was he signed that based on the fact that her brakes failed. But she never produced any proof of that. Contract null and void!

[@sandylane5498]

I have to say this is one of the 1st times I disagree with judge Milian. She had a contract in writing and he didn't fulfill it.

[@mollycuddle9990]

Agree. It was when the barbershop was mentioned. It’s not relevant whatsoever. Judge showed her entitlement and embarrassment and quit, never mind that this whole case will monetarily gain due to the entertainment value for the show. Plaintiff should’ve won. Yep. ✌🏼

[@babyface9206]

It was an as is sale. It’s as simple as that

[@Fater4511]

A contract has to have to parties that would benefit somehow. The car group/barbershop is not benefitting by helping her find another car.

[@highlander666]

"crookster"?😅 I don't know, she sounds pretty naïve and possibly conniving; should have done her research or at a minimum, brought a responsible adult with her to make the purchase. I also doubt she's really in school with her "imtreperd" & "mumph".🤣

[@David-cc8xe]

She purchased a car from a barbershop! What the hell can you expect?

[@tommyjones6866]

Shoulda done her research and looked up the word "crookster" first cause that aint no damn word

[@marilynwillett804]

@@David-cc8xe Look she's young, first car, she trusted some idiot, he talked her into it,. THE JUDGE IS 100% WRONG.

[@David-cc8xe]

@Marilyn Willet so are you saying that all younger ppl are dumb and cannot make a decision by themselves? You are insulting a lot of ppl right now...

[@ButtonsCasey]

@@David-cc8xe A lot can't though. Most young people are inexperienced due to being young.

[@kimberlyadorno280]

Someone should explain to both the plaintiff and defendant what "As is sale" means. He tried to do her a favor and she got entitled, then ended up with nothing. Also, I'm not so sure it was faulty brakes. She would need that proof for the insurance company, so surely she would have it for court? Sounds like a good excuse for tailing too closely or just not paying attention. When your brakes are about to let go, you can distinctly hear it wearing out. Having had the brake light on was the perfect excuse for her own mishap.

[@cflournoy1529]

Crookster!! Lol, that’s a new one😂😂

[@lescobrandon9693]

He may be a nice guy, but I think what’s really going on is that he likes her.

[@janetmccoy7945]

Exactly! That woman was drop dead gorgeous!

[@foxwithtubesox1075]

If there was any kind of physical beauty (and there wasn't), it was greatly overshadowed by her nasty character.

[@stephanieramirez15]

People go through all the work of filing a suit but don’t bother bringing proof 🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴

[@MrCharlesEldredge]

I was surprised at Judge Millie's ruling on this one. I agree with it, I just thought she was leaning the other way. The plaintiff had zero evidence. The defendant did seem to be a good guy who just wanted to please his customer. It's true the brake light thing happened, but his answer to that was believable. She drove the car with no brake problems for 8 days. And in my experience, when I was much much younger, brakes usually don't fail completely....they just don't stop you as fast....and you are already well aware that the brakes have needed work for awhile.

[@artistjoh]

After this woman's true character was revealed in the hall I strongly suspect that any man who makes the mistake of marrying her is going to face a nightmare of being blamed for everything that goes wrong because this woman has never known the feeling of taking responsibility for her own actions. She buys an auction car from a barber shop/car sales, trusts an alley mechanic to fix a brake problem. As soon as that came up I knew that there was no work done on the brakes, merely something done to turn the light out, and then that was confirmed later by the barber investor. Then she doesn't bring evidence from a mechanic that the brakes were faulty. All we know is that someone took less than five minutes to turn off the light. We don't even have to get into what caused the accident because there is already a mountain of things that are her responsibility, but instead of facing her own mistakes she makes personal attacks on the guy that she chose. As Humphrey Bogart said in Casablanca “Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, she walks into mine.” She chose him. Her mistake. Her fault.

[@bethechange8889]

How the heck is a "salesman" in a position to replace a car/s or refund money? He must be an owner or relative of the owner. Oh he lied when first asked if he's a owner. Now he's selling cars from hbehind his barbershop.

[@themadmillionaire]

Gurl, this is YOUR fault! Take responsibility for your silly decisions. Guilty! 👩🏿‍⚖️

[@debbieparris9343]

I've had a car that the brakes went out quite offen. But did she have him work on her brakes before the wreck?

[@newsflash7609]

I highly suspect the brake failure here is a result of her not pressing the pedal.

[@BREEZYM6015]

It's the case of "Not catching a brake".😄

[@nakitaaustin3445]

“Crookster” 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@camarojai6832]

How many “businesses” does the defendant have his hands in?! 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@chuck9380]

The brake light can come on because of the emergency brake or brake dust on the brake light sensor very common problem. If you have bad brakes the light won’t come on.

[@loncaselton]

No good deed goes unpunished

[@ButtonsCasey]

Our last truck had brake issues. They did not just go out one day. They ain't lights.

[@magicworld3242]

The plaintiff is completely lying. She only complained about the brakes (AFTER) she got into a car accident. I don't believe anything was wrong with her brakes. She destroyed (her) car and now she wants some money. She literally had ZERO proof anything actually happened.

[@garydumont9701]

I was a brake specialist when I was young now I am in my 70s and I work for a very large company

[@lando1071]

Breaks failed. Mechanic said so. Brings ZERO proof 😂

[@24blunt]

this is why you can't help people out. once you buy a car the rest is all on you. but he won't make it in business.

[@sirgeorge8522]

Good judge today

[@1976kookiemama]

I'm so confused because judge always says get shit in writing and she brings shit in writing, but still loses. He agreed to return her money.

[@deeluu7560]

Right! My thoughts exactly smh they just be making shit up as they go 😂

[@themadmillionaire]

I think she’s just sick of these as is no warranty transactions and you come to court with no expert witness.

[@ebonyeyed08ti]

As the judge said, the note didn’t state guilt, she saw the defendant as trying to maker the defendant happy and the fact that she didn’t bring proof of the shop doing a bad break job , or having a witness stating that the breaks were faulty and unsafe, that’s why she lost , no proof .the defendant tried to get her other cars , because he knew she had school, he didn’t have to.

[@deeluu7560]

@@ebonyeyed08ti it's called a "promissory note" not a "guilt note" he promised to repay her and he didn't. The judge just felt bad for him, because she knew the lady didn't have proof, period.

[@Fater4511]

@@deeluu7560 a promissory note is a note to repay a debt. He doesn't have one to repay. This is nothing.

[@caanramah5879]

That peach-pink type colour really looks good on the plaintiff

[@moniqueme1600]

Wow, the true ignorance and gall of that woman plaintiff.

[@mrs.rogersneighborhood]

Why didn’t she bring evidence of the brakes failing?

[@sobreezymimi7622]

She is full of BS. THAT WHAT THAT IS. Tried to bully that guy.

[@heatherbaker8596]

Isn't some of the responsibility on her, Its called car maintenance, it may not of overheated if she checked the coolant/water, the breaks may not have failed if the break fluid saw toped up. these are basic things a car owner should check every week.

[@missbradicah]

Some folks don't know the difference between brakes, as on a car. And breaks, like an object being damaged or destroyed.

[@leisurefarm]

It is patently clear the brakes were not the issue, or she would have said: can i call up the shop now or come back with evidence. The judge would have told her off but at least it would have hinted she might be telling the truth. The most likely truth is she caused she caused an accident and wants to pin it on someone else.

[@lauracurtin631]

Entitled youth. She had an accident and blames someone else for the problems. He did way more than his fair share but with the plaintiff, it's never enough.

[@carolynthornton8017]

IN MY VIEW The plaintiffs story about her brakes failing causing a car pile-up accident was not convincing. I'm glad she lost.

[@miss_anthropy]

Once you get bad service, it's time to go elsewhere. To expect the same ppl giving you issues to fix them is moronic

[@danahyde5282]

"crookster" is not a word ma'am! Grow up and take responsibility for your actions! 🙄

[@NellieKAdaba]

Right.

[@missbradicah]

It's a mashup, between crook and gangster.

[@tommyjones6866]

This is a surprising outcome. I think the plaintiff caused that accident, I don't think her brakes failed. But at the end of the day...the defendant signed a paper saying he was gonna get her another car, or refund her money. JM always calls herself a "contracts person." Well...isn't that a contract? She always says you can just grab a piece of toilet paper and a pen and thats good enough. Even if he was just trying to be nice, isn't he still supposed to honor that contract?

[@Channel-JJ]

👍

[@hottuna2006]

I'm nice so I promise to give you one million dollars. It's all right here in writing. Now, I've changed my mind. Try suing me for the money. Do you really think you can win the case? A promise, even if in writing, is never a contract because there is no consideration involved. Now, had the defendant said "I will give you a warranty" before the plaintiff had purchased the vehicle, that's an enforceable contract.

[@mahailiabrown3972]

He did give her another car that is how she got the second car

[@tommyjones6866]

@@mahailiabrown3972 The paper says he was supposed to give her yet another car to replace the crashed vehicle. Sounds ridiculous on his part, but thats what he agreed to.

[@maicataylor2813]

@@hottuna2006 Exactly. These people are so uneducated in the field of law

[@foxwithtubesox1075]

Suing someone else for an accident you caused is a lot better than admitting you're too ignorant to release the parking brake fully. It is a very "intreperd" move. Lol.

[@londynche]

EVIDENCE: WORDS OF THE DAY!!! Bring PROOFFF!!! SIMPLE!!!

[@Djkommode]

Note number two what do people expect from a 2200 dollar car

[@fdt1469]

(As is) that's all that needs to be addressed.

[@macypalmer1324]

Harvey is just so amazeddd when someone has a different opinion. i cant stand him lol

[@maureenahern4126]

She bought the car "as is". He owed her nothing after the sale

[@lucyjane103]

She probably was driving to fast.......lost control.

[@mexicanspec]

Add the phone to that.

[@nickmad887]

thanks

[@Pinkdiamond12]

What do you expect with such old cars

[@bobstewart5262]

I'll bet she was just driving too fast and hit the brakes late, causing a 4 car chain reaction.

[@ericedwards2853]

He owns the used car place it's just not a legal one he buys cars at the auction.n resell them I am surprised the judge didn't dig deeper when he didn't want the car company name revealed

[@leesa4742]

A crookster lmao 🤣 Well she’s a bad driver She knows darn well her brakes did not go out any normal person when I got that in writing

[@whatsthetruth_review]

I believe the plaintiff. HOWEVER, she should of done her due diligence and shopped around for legitimate used car salesmen/ company before rushing into a more cheaper and convenient option. Idc who disagrees with me on my opinion, shady ppl are everywhere. And I do agree with the judge's decision.

[@tommyjones6866]

You honestly believe that her brakes just completely gave out after 9 days of driving it with no brake issues? If she had a mechanic look at it and conclude that the brakes went out, it would have been VERY easy to bring that to court. He could have wrote up an estimate to fix the breaks and write on their "total brake failure" or something. There is a reason she didn't have that paper.

[@DavidKen878]

Stop believing people just people they're black women.

[@foxwithtubesox1075]

#believeallwomen. LMAO.

[@thegrouphomegoddess9684]

Ur car ur business! Carry on

[@ericak1949]

Aren't "lemons" for new cars that have significant issues out of the assembly line? Feel like the term of lemon is tossed around this show for 12+ yr old cars

[@Lovely_1One]

She bought the car As Is and just wanted free services or a free car! She knows good and damn well she was the cause of the accident and had the audacity to want to get paid for what she did with that nasty azz attitude! Just ugh! Glad the defendant won!

[@lisaparrey1343]

In Australia a car under 10 years old has to be sold with a 3 month warrantly and all cars must have a roadworthy certificate which also includes brake tests

[@Zoot_of_Anthrax]

Both cars were well over 10yrs old btw

[@thebookwasbetter3650]

She says a new battery is $130. If you are wondering why it's so much, I had a Stratus and you have to remove the wheel to get at the battery. Chrysler says it extends the battery life by not exposing it to so much heat. So it costs extra to replace.

[@laurafarner4851]

Am I the only one who noticed the girl on the right in the red hat with the creeper behind her with his hand on her waist while they're talking outside the courthouse? She looks so miserable and uncomfortable the whole time...😥 I hope she's okay

[@toniaphillips9695]

I don't know why people don't have these used cars checked before buying. Crazy!

[@glenngatlen8179]

Crookster? Is that a word?

[@RayshawnMartinez]

Ya'll keep saying he wrote her saying he would pay her back, butt the plaintiff whole reasoning why the car failed were due to bad breaks which she had NO EVIDENCE to PROVE, & that why the judge dismissed that written agreement..She had no proof because she wasn't paying attention driving & caused the accident herself at her own fault.

[@xonx209]

People who don't know much about cars and don't want to spend money to have a certified mechanic to check their car should stay away from cheap used cars. They may end up needing costly repair.

[@jamesy29]

It is called, buyers beware. It is up to the person who is looking to purchase a car, to first have a certified Mechanic look at it and give it a good Inspection before any cash changes hands.

[@kerrywhite5253]

I believe her.