Britain's Smartest People

This is the peak of British intellect
Subscribe to my main channel!: @memeulous
Twitter: / memeulous
Instagram: / memeulous
Merch: www.memeulous.s...
Business/media enquiries: [e-mail]

[@The_ginger_fisherman]

I have a lab called Rusty. A couple of weeks back he was attacked by an XL bully (the only dog that's ever attacked him). Thankfully didn't do too much damage just a deep cut to his ear. Both were on leads and completely unprovoked. Fast forward to the "ban" news and I see a post on the local towns facebook page from a woman with a bully. She had pictures of her and the kids playing with it in the park with a written message about how amazing they are and a lovely family dog..... It was the SAME goddam dog that had attacked my lab in the exact same park a couple weeks previous! The Irony!

[@user-xd7dt6gr8l]

I will make the point that while allowing that dog near other dogs is irresponsible, dog aggression is VERY different than people aggression. I worked with handling all kinds of dogs for a period of time, there were a lot of dogs that were perfectly fine with us and children, but that had a red mark because if they were allowed around other dogs they would attack them. There are also dogs that get leash aggressive, as in they get along with dogs when off leash, but when on leash they get super defensive since the lead limits their ability to run off and can make them nervous around stranger dogs. So I will say it's very feasible that the dog is fine around people but not other dogs, or is just leash aggressive. That being said if you aren't sure whether your dog is dog aggressive (or if you know it is), it is absolutely irresponsible to let it around other dogs with no precautions.

[@Nina-bh5jj]

I hope you called her out

[@callum5735]

What’s the bet your lab was off lead

[@The_ginger_fisherman]

@@callum5735 nope we were sat on a bench with him on a short lead while we watched the kids play. The woman with the bully walked right past us and it as soon as they got close enough it just went for rusty. She was very apologetic and seemed shocked, so I imagine it might of been the first time it had happened, but still 🤷‍♂️

[@MrDjSeamless325]

​@callum5735 why do you pitbull nutter always jump straight to victim blaming?

[@Electrifyyy]

Allow ownership of these dogs the same way we allow ownership of guns in the UK. Owning a weapon should be subject to passing a screening from the government. We have minimal gun deaths because of it

[@isopodhours]

Horses are far more dangerous than xls and kill more people every year but you're not wanting a license for them?

[@Arran05]

@@isopodhours The general public are not buying horses to keep inside of their homes

[@chilli-iceolive-abode2447]

​@@isopodhoursto be fair though you don't get many people walking horses through town centres and in parks.

[@isopodhours]

@@chilli-iceolive-abode2447 they literally do in London, the Kings guard horses are an attraction tourists regularly go up to and harrass

[@isopodhours]

@@Arran05 the general public are buying horses and taking them out on hacks through villages and on roads, the general public sends kids to riding schools, the general public treat the Kings horses in London as a tourist attraction, the police use them to keep football matches and protests in line

[@herbie1975]

Where I live, these dogs are so called "listed dogs" (dog breeds with a higher potential of harm) and you need a permit to have those. That means basically, you need more training as an owner and there is a character testing of the dog, if you or the dog fail, you can't have the dog.

[@cassidyallengar]

This is exactly what is needed! It will stop people who have no business owns these dogs because they don’t want to put the work in from getting them.

[@thomasandrewclifford]

Seems reasonable.

[@roukerasati9611]

That sounds perfectly reasonable.

[@LeZylox]

Where do you live? Like not in a creepy way, i just want to know where such laws exist

[@herbie1975]

@@LeZylox I live in Switzerland (Canton Thurgau). However, these regulations/laws with the list dogs is different from canton to canton or can be handled differently. Here you also have to visit a dog school if a dog is heavier than 15 kg and/or taller than 40 cm.

[@magnusbruce4051]

I met a guy on a train the other day who had an XL bully with him. He looked like the type who'd get a big aggressive dog for the wrong reasons, but actually chatting to him he seemed pretty responsible. He just kind of accepted the new rules saying "I've got to start muzzle training him and he's going to have to get the snip". His attitude seemed to be "it is what it is" rather than "the rules are stupid and I won't follow them". The dog itself seemed pretty chill but I have no doubt it could have absolutely wrecked me if it wanted to.

[@Killjoy_Mel]

Good to hear. But then that's a responsible dog owner who knows the dangers, has done the work, and doesn't take the bully ban as an attack on him as a person. The reason why these bullies are getting banned is because far too many bullies to be acceptable do not end up in the care of an owner who's content to follow the rules because he understands why the rules are for, and who has dine what had to be done even before the hammer came down.

[@magnusbruce4051]

@@Killjoy_MelOh yeah, just to be clear, I'm not against the ban at all. While a bad owner will lead to a bad dog, a good owner cannot erase the traits that are bred into a dog. Like when you have a retriever and it retrieves things you say "yep, that's what he's supposed to do". When a dog that's built to kill and fight decides to maul a child it's suddenly nothing to do with the dog. Similarly, although I think huskies look amazing, I wouldn't ever get one because they can and have turned on their owners. I think I'll just stick with owning border collies as, although they're a handful, they're not aggressive breeds and imo they look basically the cutest out of all breeds.

[@bongoloid4407]

yh for alot of young men, that dog is like their child, in the way they love them n want them to b happy, and tbh big kinda rough looking lads are gonna have more luck keeping a dog like that tame n lovly casue its gotta know its place else they become unruly, never judge a book i guess, only problem is the few bad apple are walking tanks, i wouldnt like to have to decide whats right

[@heatran4109]

I saw someone with one of these dogs on the bus last week. That thing was huge and the guy who owned it was rambling on about that same “oh but there’s rapists and pedophiles” thing the entire time. He also claimed that if the dog was dangerous, it would’ve already attacked me which, as a 16 year old, is a bit concerning.

[@wolfguy1234]

Also saw one of these dogs on a bus not long ago, instantly got off at the next stop

[@heatran4109]

@@wolfguy1234 I don’t blame you, those things are terrifying

[@Swedishmafia101MemeCorporation]

The owners are almost as bad as the dog itself

[@heatran4109]

@@Swedishmafia101MemeCorporation I agree, the one I saw on the bus was pretty chill (the dog, not the owner) but for all I know they both could’ve been maniacs

[@Swedishmafia101MemeCorporation]

​@@heatran4109Like, the skinhead in the video with the spiked chain collar is probably an accurate representation of the average XL Bully owner.

[@SpareTheBombers]

i think they should treat xl bullies the same as other potentially dangerous animals that you can own. make people get licensing and certification and restrict the breed to specialists, the same way people own venomous snakes and alligators and shit. background checks would also be a good idea cos for obvious reasons you dont want a wrong un owning a giant ball of biting.

[@Lucaz99]

The thing is…you don’t take your those animals out on walks in the public. You don’t put a collar on your pet snakes, alligators and whatever hell else people own, idk it could be tigers who need a lot of space and activity but THEY ARE NEVER SUPPOSED TO GO OUT IN THE PUBLIC. But with these dogs, walking/exercising them is necessary and accidents happen way more often than with other dangerous wildlife. Unless they keep their pets in the confines of their property, then they can only harm their owner. But I don’t see dog owners agreeing to that.

[@kore.7313]

@@Lucaz99 lol i dont get the huge deal about these. my neighbour owns one and his is the sweetest dog ive ever met

[@isopodhours]

@@Lucaz99 we literally use horses as a tourist attraction when they've killed more people than xls

[@FLTNUR]

​@@isopodhoursJust because something killed more than another doesn't invalidate the fact that the other thing can still kill.

[@isopodhours]

@@FLTNUR no but only one of those is getting demonised and banned

[@onlydubs1104]

if a household cant spell the word "right" correctly you probably are not intelligent enough to care for a dog like that lol

[@ConnorCutt]

great point 🤣

[@datcheesecakeboi6745]

yes im sure grammar is very important when training a fucking dog correctly

[@L0ve1tRetr0]

That spelling aswell... How do you get to 'Rigt'? 🤔 I know it's technically closer because it's just missing a letter, but I feel like if you're gonna write 'right' wrong then 'rite' at least sounds right. Right?

[@Penguinstudios123]

I mean… dyslexics do exist. And it doesn’t mean they’re not smart.. 🤨

[@robyntheslytherin]

​@@Penguinstudios123we don't miss letters, we mix them up 🤣

[@JoeWuhPuh]

I got attacked by a Jack Russell a couple weeks back, and getting attacked by one of those is something entirely different to getting attacked by a literal tank

[@paichni3474]

Not to sound rude but the kind of person who really wants to own one of the most dangerous dogs and will go to a rally when they’re banned is the kind of nutter that I don’t want to own a dangerous dog.

[@isopodhours]

Any animal can be dangerous, horses and cows are more dangerous than xl bullies and kill more people per year

[@Sam-qe2eo]

sadly those nutters will just go get a goddam cane corso or something now which makes an xl bully look like a pompom

[@Killjoy_Mel]

It's not rude, it's common sense.

[@zanmiklosic3138]

no dog breed is born more or less agressive, its dog and training specific. there are many breeds just as dangerous but arnt used by gangs as weapons... yet. we gonna ban all large breeds?

[@cmposting]

@@zanmiklosic3138 you put "no dog breed is born more or less aggressive" and "there are many breeds just as dangerous" in the same comment, congratulations bro

[@EpicIrishGaming]

The thing is, nobody is surprised when a Labrador wants to go for a swim in a lake or when a sighthound wants to chase after a squirrel because they know they were bred to do a job relating to those activities. It’s instinct for them. So I don’t get why people try to say that it’s 100% how you raise it. When you get a dog that has been bred for a particular purpose, you have to take on that responsibility and be aware of its instincts. Doesn’t matter if it’s cuddly with your six kids, it if was bred to hunt small game, it’s not gonna care if it’s chewing through a wild rabbit or your neighbours shitzu should it get the chance. Also a lot of people get these types of breeds and then deny that part of their intention when getting it was to have an intimidating dog. XLs are just a result of the wrong people owning a dog that can absolutely not be treated the same way as more social and friendly breeds.

[@EnclosedPoolArea]

These are the sort of people who see the videos of lions cuddling with humans and see themselves in their shoes.

[@shyla9062]

Backyard breeders are breeding all the bad things back into the XL Bully 🙄 it’s horrible really. I am so glad someone is talking about dog genetics, it’s so important! Bloodhounds were bred to track game, therefore they do a behaviour called baying; GENETICS. You wouldn’t be surprised your Dobermann is protective, or that your Collie displays herding behaviour.

[@imoutofluck7836]

it’s so funny when people say that the breed has no bearing on temperament. why do you think we selectively bred dogs for thousands of years to perform certain tasks then if the genetics play no part? why don’t livestock farmers or the police or search and rescue workers just get any old dog from the pound? why do service dog trainers have such rigorous genetic testing before they train a puppy?😭

[@shyla9062]

@@imoutofluck7836 REALLLL

[@Erratic_Pulse_0758]

My sheltie will chase my sister around and nip at her heels, just like her ancestors did with sheep! It’s so cute, although I think if she saw a real sheep she would be terrified lol

[@Arran05]

These XL bully people are literally using the exact same arguments that I've seen weird American gun owners using lmao

[@toastman42]

This is truly the most educational content i have seen, my iq has increased tenfold. Thank you george 'memeulous'.

[@auxistic]

Agreed, my brain pulsed as I watched this video

[@Lore-mc7zw]

@@auxistic watching the living dead vomit out media talking points does that.

[@eungeran07]

@@Lore-mc7zw Huh??

[@Lore-mc7zw]

@@eungeran07 durr?

[@troublesome1019]

You clearly started from a low base then 🤣🤣🙈

[@1specified]

My family was told we had a banned breed. He was sold to us as a Staffordshire Terrier, and I still believe he was (maybe he was a cross or something?), but we took him to the vet with a gut issue. The vets barely looked at him, decided he was a banned breed and, didn't take him to some specialised facility and didn't even ask where we got him from, they just put him down. That is what this leads to; people tend not to want to get into trouble and choose the most hassle free solution. Also, don't trust the phrase "he's a sweetheart" or "wouldn't hurt a fly", whether they're saying it about an animal or a person. People are biased and it's an easy way to be dismissive. These people probably raised their bully like it's a Border Collie; different breeds have different specifications for raising them, so when a person who's ignorant to that raises an aggressive breed, the dog gets over-excited, it stresses them out and the owner mistakes it for playfulness. And that's why I think it should be a licensing thing; go through a course or something. Don't ban them because lazy people who want no trouble kill them "just to be safe". Now that they're banned they'll just become the next breed that's trafficked in and arguably becomes even more dangerous because you have to go through a whole sketchy process to get one.

[@denofsouls9564]

The problem with banned breeds, is that it’s not even just those breeds. It’s any dog that looks like those too. It’s the easiest solution, but I don’t believe it’s the right one.

[@Maglev178]

Yeah would definitely be much worse if people were buying them from some sketchy puppy farm that mistreated them, but that probably happens anyway because they would be cheaper. If they put in a licence for XLs they would also need to tighten up monitoring on that sort of stuff, maybe fund the RSPCA or something to do it for them, though, saying that, the government is more likely to give one of their friends from down the pub with no experience in that area the money for it and call it a day

[@denofsouls9564]

@VoidTaker if I’m remembering correctly, in Portugal, where I originally came from, all dogs require licenses, but “dangerous breeds” (staffies, pit bulls, etc) require a special license and mandatory classes

[@RamboSnoop]

unfortunately, if your staffie was mixed with pitbull (as is often the case), vet did the right thing.

[@1specified]

​@@RamboSnoopIf you're not just being a dickhead and you actually believe that, you need to reassess the way you view things.

[@AemiliaJacobus]

If a chihuahua comes and bites your leg, give it one kick and the dog will go flying. If a bully bites your leg, good luck trying to even get the thing off. Knowing that these dogs are bred for appearance alone proves there is a negligent disregard for the health and temperament of those dogs.

[@Zaabi1]

I just hate dogs in general so I don’t mind seeing less jacked dogs running around.

[@isopodhours]

They're not bred for appearance alone, according to the breed standard in the country they originate from they should be friendly family dogs. "The American Bully breed is, first and foremost, a companion, exhibiting confidence with a zest and exuberance for life. Despite its powerful appearance, their demeanor is gentle and friendly. This breed makes an excellent family dog. The ideal American Bully possesses the athleticism to do well in performance events. Aggressive behavior towards humans is uncharacteristic of the breed, and highly undesirable. Disqualifications: Viciousness or extreme shyness." - United kennel club , 125 years old. You wanna see a dog bred purely for appearance? Look at "big rope" french bulldogs or "fluffy" frenchies or "exotic" bullies or "pocket" bullies.

[@dezee2412]

I wonder how the IQ of the XL bully compares to some XL owners.

[@delinquent6241]

Or just maybe you blame the owner not the dog.

[@Lethalwepon309]

@@delinquent6241again he states this but yet again most men can beat up most dog breads but not that unit of a dog that mostly drug dealers have they attack police and police dogs resulting in lives the government has to act that’s the whole point in this

[@delinquent6241]

@@Lethalwepon309 Not really, idk where the information your spouting is coming from but they wouldnt be banning a dog due to drug dealers owning them, they also own pitbulls, chihuahuas etc, before you comment do some research please or atleast make some sense

[@isopodhours]

@@Lethalwepon309 drug dealers also own cats, shall we ban them as well?

[@AngryDuck8461]

I think there should be a license or something in place for dogs like this

[@EnclosedPoolArea]

I think it would be better to make a law where they are not allowed outside the home. Same way you wouldn't want people with other kinds of dangerous pets like alligators walking them around the town.

[@earthisflat]

1984

[@earthisflat]

Yes more restrictions that will help 😒

[@LucinaMeow]

Doubt that'll work tbh.

[@Peachymitsuri]

In my opinion these owners are part of the xl bully ban problem. They need to step up and take responsibility and realise their pet is easily capable of killing anything. “My dog would never 🥺” yeah and that’s the same attitude of the owners who’s XL bully that have killed people.

[@isopodhours]

It's also the attitude of small dog owners, when small dogs have killed numerous people in the past and cause injury to both people and other animals. Even your loveable labradors and doodles have seriously injured and killed people before.

[@shyla9062]

@@isopodhoursdoodles are such pointless mixes… everything you look for in a doodle you can find in a poodle!

[@Subjagator]

@@isopodhours Sure, but when a minority of breeds are responsible for the majority of attacks you need to look at why and see about doing something. I just did a quick google search and found some statistics for my country. Out of 158 fatal attacks involving dogs, 113 were from pit bulls, 18 Rottweilers and 6 Huskies. Those were the top 3 breeds involved in fatal dog attacks. That is 71% of all fatal dog attacks were from pit bulls. 13% of deaths were from every other breed other that wasn't one of those top 3. Clearly there is something to those numbers and saying but look, 1 of those deaths was a Golden Retriever so lets ignore the 100+ from the pit bulls is a fucking stupid argument.

[@SirSkyro]

@@isopodhours small dog owners don't consistently murder people because they don't have the capability to, hence why they are deemed as safe - even an 8 year old could probably beat the shit out of a chihuahua if they were getting mauled and the owners can contain them so it almost never comes to that even if the dog is an aggressive little shit

[@isopodhours]

@@SirSkyro they have still killed people

[@SirPanikalot778]

George is unironically my main source of news now.

[@gracielovesseungmin]

the fact they have xl in the name is already fucking terrifying

[@jdjfajfiladjfasdhflkasdksj6280]

They should stop breeding and selling them but the existing ones should be allowed to live out the rest of their lives peacefully somewhere safe.

[@OmniversalInsect]

Like where?

[@neonwired4978]

until they kill a kid

[@yeetjones927]

​@@OmniversalInsectThe countryside. I've lived away from cities all my life and have never seen one of these dogs, they aren't common out here.

[@largeladsteve25]

I don't think anyone is arguing for a mass genocide of these things. They're angry and dangerous but they *are* still dogs and should be given a chance to live out their lives. Just let this lot go through their natural lifecycle and don't sell anymore

[@morgjones13]

I believe that is the plan. Nobody is saying they should all be put down, just that they can't breed them... dog breeding in the UK is very lucrative, especially for breeds like this which is possibly why so many people are upset

[@whimai412]

I don't think it's too much of a stipulation to make it so these dogs owners need a license. Especially if they can get up the weight of a full grown man. Absolutely bonkers. My pup is a medium sized dog, she's 45 lbs. But she is agile and muscley. Like I wouldn't want any larger of a dog cuz I think they would be hard to handle.

[@EnclosedPoolArea]

They should be treated like other dangerous, exotic pets. Certainly should not be allowed in public.

[@Sam-qe2eo]

@@EnclosedPoolArea the trouble is that the assholes who own the out of control xl bullies will just go get some other dog thats just as bad

[@bjh107]

Nahhh, take it a step further. I think everyone who wants to own a dog, no matter the breed, should have to prove that they can train, look after and fund it (eg vets bills, food etc). There are so many awfully behaved dogs around because owners just think theyre 'cute' and its disgusting. I have 2 staffies, not perfect but they are lead trained, have good recall and know the word no. They've been attacked by 2 different collies, a lab and a countless number of those doodle things. Now got scars and people assume that its because they've been fighting, its daft

[@whimai412]

@@bjh107 There is so many ppl that get dogs as some sort of trophy and don't actually train or take care of them. So yeah I totes agree.

[@bjh107]

@@whimai412 its mad isnt it. If there were rules in place to stop these people just getting a dog on a whim there would be far fewer mistreated and dangerous dogs

[@oakzutv]

"It's not the breed, it's the owner" gives "guns aren't dangerous, it's the people who own them" vibes

[@nimbob19]

It isn’t the breed though😭XL bullies aren’t genetically prone to human or animal aggression, they’ve just been so badly bred by drug addicts and idiots that don’t pair two genetically sound, in standard XLs and then sell them to people who don’t bother socialising and training them.

[@jeffery9543]

funny enough, its the psychos who will do something stupid or aggressive with their guns that are the problem, just like how people who don't raise any type of dog correctly will create a dangerous reactive animal. I'm not pro gun, but guns aren't living creatures. These dogs are about to be slaughtered in the tens of thousands with this shitty ban. There should just be much more aggressive legal punishment for people who don't raise ANY dog properly and ends up getting someone killed.

[@NeekoGood]

​@@nimbob19 you're insane. Take one glance at statistics of deaths/violent attacks sorted by dog breeds and pit mixes are always at the top. I've seen 8 week old litters of pit puppies eat each other. Their instinct to attack and bite down until they literally get beat to death is due to their breed, just like how a shepherd breed will try to herd anything that moves.

[@deutschegeschichte4972]

There's a difference. Dogs can think for themselves, if they attack it's on them. Guns can't. Guns don't kill people, people kill people. If we outlaw guns we might as well outlaw steak knifes, metal pipes, heck why not outlaw baseball clubs and airsoft rifles, those can kill and seriously injure too can't they?

[@renomiz2373]

@@deutschegeschichte4972 Dumb argument for guns. Difference is i can outrun someone with a knife/pipe/baseball bat and air soft guns can't kill or do lethal damage so you can still run away. Can't say the same for a Glock 19 or a Remington 870 :/

[@chelseaelizabeth4040]

I absolutely believe there’s more of a likelihood that smaller less suspecting breeds are more vicious and likely to attack but that doesn’t change the fact that not every breed has the sheer muscle power these ones have and the capability to cause the same amount of damage. I owned a staffie for most of my teen years and he was wonderful, such a sweet boy who would sleep in my bed because he would get scared sleeping alone and the one time in my life I’ve ever been bitten by a dog was by a jack Russell mix but when that dog bit me it just hurt for a bit, when these larger dogs attack you you’re gonna get your jaw ripped off. I love dogs and absolutely believe 90% of the time it’s down to how they’re raised but even the most loved and responsibly trained animal can snap because it’s an animal… they have animalistic instincts and when your dog has the muscle mass of Eddie Hall it’s not looking good for you if they ever flip out. It’s also such an over the top reaction, Rishi Sunak isn’t about to take to the streets with a meat cleaver to start demolishing every pitbull resembling breed he can find, banned dogs can still be owned in the UK it’s just much tighter restrictions around owning one.

[@Glegh]

George is definitely in the top %99.7 IQ

[@eclipticcat]

True

[@pickanapple]

Top 100%

[@georgiykireev9678]

Smarter than 0.3% of the population? That's not a very high standard

[@eclipticcat]

@@georgiykireev9678 that's the point bruv

[@alluringvoice7081]

@georgiykireev9678 wow, it’s almost like that’s the joke…

[@Arran05]

There's such an easy solution to this, before you get an XL bully you need a license and to get that license you need to go through extreme training for however long it takes, then once you have your license you can get your hellhound called Princess but you have to bring your dog to mandatory checkups every 6 months and if you don't then you lose your license and your dog. The public can't be trusted with these dogs, I could literally go and buy one tomorrow and then just set it free on a playground.

[@Subjagator]

Muzzles. It worked in my country for all of those 'dangerous' breeds. We looked at thee stats and picked the dogs that were top of the list for attacks which caused severe injury or death, put them on a list and made laws that required they be muzzled and on a leash at all times in public, and now we have significantly lower numbers of severe injury and death from those breeds.

[@Swedishmafia101MemeCorporation]

"But sir, my Toddler-Destroyer XD War Machine Super Killer Supreme is a good boy!"

[@Phear0saur]

I definitely agree that these very powerful dogs need specialist owners. People say how "they're bred to be agressive" but would you send an untrained boarder collie out with a bunch of sheep because "they're bred to do it"? No, but once they're trained to do it, they are VERY good at it. I think the same is applied with Bullies. They're not bred FOR something, they're bred to be GOOD at something, and if that dog is bred to have huge jaw muscles, a powerful/heavy build, and the strength of a thousand men, it definitely has the power to kill. I don't think they're personality is meant to be this horrible beast, but sometimes when training & socialising isn't done, things can go wrong very quickly.

[@spaghetti_1st]

unfortunatly these breed could end up in the wrong hands which personally i think people should have licence to own these dogs to reduce the chance it could end up being used to kill

[@Killjoy_Mel]

What? Do you think that babies are also born as blank slates? Or would you agree that some infants and toddlers are more calm and even tempered, while others are more active, aggressive and stubborn? Same with dog breeds. Some breeds are bred for strength, intelligence, or aggression, which large Bullies are. It's not all nurture, a good part of that breed is nature. Some dogs, you can train them within the inch of their lives, and they will always remain more dangerous. And it's not a big deal when your little pomeranian is a bit more tetchy, but when it's your XL Bully, then you've got a 110lb problem with claws and teeth in your hands. The second problem is that you simply cannot guarantee that these dogs will end up being bred responsibly, because breeding responsibly is difficult and expensive and turns lower profit than a puppy mill. The third problem is that you cannot determine with certainty, which dog owners have the experience, the temper and the means to make more or less sure that their bully isn't a threat to anybody or anything. You just cannot. So yes, in this case the easy solution is the best solution, because there isn't a world where the government will provide diligent oversight and resource to making sure that bullies are bred responsibly, trained responsibly, and owned responsibly. And the right to have a large, strong and often aggressive dog breed does not trump a human's, or even another dog's or cat's right to remain alive and unharmed by said dog.

[@jacobmoore4493]

Most owners who's dog ends up hurting someone always says "I dont know why this happened, they would never hurt a fly..". They're incredibly dangerous, the dog is bred for a purpose that is why their attacks are often so deadly and common. I agree no cull, but we can't keep breeding bigger and more dangerous dogs.

[@isopodhours]

Banning the xl bully will cause irresponsible backyard breeders to breed bigger dogs. Cane corsos, presa canarios, great danes, boerboels, Caucasian shepherds, neapolitan mastiffs, dobermans, rottweilers, St Bernard's, newfoundlands, Irish wolfhounds, bernese mountain dogs are all large dogs that have the ability to kill and be aggressive, and if people decided to irresponsibly breed them exclusively to be aggressive and dangerous that doesn't mean the entire breed is dangerous. Most big dog breeds are at least 50 year old, with the xl bully being established as a breed in the 1990s in America , we got them in the uk around 2014. They're not a new breed, they're not some new hybrid a druggie bred to protect their product, they were bred to be a family dog and when bred according to american kennel club standard they are required to have the temperament of a family dog (calm, loving)

[@Bigshag420]

@@isopodhours👏👏

[@HS-ig4ly]

@@isopodhours you cant police if someone is a loving or not family. the fact is this breed of dog is bred to kill and be aggressive. Its the general public, many people will not be able or not want to raise it correctly. even if it is raised well its still an animal, an aggressive one at that. Stopping it from legally being bred means 99.9% of people cant get a hand on it, those people being the main problem.

[@Sam-qe2eo]

@@isopodhours too right. even for people who couldnt give a hoot about dogs this could cause even more and worse attacks

[@jacobmoore4493]

"Bred to be a family dog". How is an XL bull bred to be a "family dog". They have an insane bite strength, they're incredibly strong and dangerous. They are far beyond the means of just a "family dog" unless that dog is used for "protection" and if so, that's why they're bred by rough sorts and drug dealers/criminals. Dogs cannot be protection in the UK for most cases, if your dog savages someone you and your dog is fucked.@@isopodhours Great Danes are huge, but they were bred historically for a purpose and are proven much safer. They aren't a dog being bred and getting larger and larger by the decade, but Pitbull XLs keep getting bigger and bigger.​

[@lisasingfield4683]

Saw someone on Twitter call the news on the ban on the XL Bully 'Dog Racism', which is insane. Its so crazy how those people are so upset over banning a dog more than the inhumane way the Tories are treating the human rights of migrants. Everything is going great here on Normal Island.

[@kaimactrash]

that one annoys me too, especially since the term "breedism" has existed for ages.

[@bleedinghandshughes]

what they're not mentioning here is that, XL bullies are related to pitbulls which are band after something like 300 deaths, it was a breed recognised as independent 10 years ago or something, they're bred from American Pit Bull Terriers and American Staffordshire Bull Terriers, two of the most dangerous dogs, they just gave it a new name - Generally, dog breeds with wide heads and weighing between 66-100 pounds are more likely to bite and attack

[@josht4901]

Staffordshire terriers are not dangerous dogs mate 🤣

[@bleedinghandshughes]

yes but pitbulls are and they are cross bread with a pitbull @@josht4901

[@sStormy]

George is the smartest British person ever

[@Biggroundsley]

🥩🚴??

[@brobs0463]

👨🏻🌮??

[@AdamSheehan-pm8zq]

🥩🪘??

[@robyntheslytherin]

🏈🧠??

[@Kawa-Yuki]

I saw a news article yesterday about one of them attacking one of the protesters… I actually think it was that same guy from 5:10 “An XL Bully 'campaigner' who stood up for them and urged people to stop 'blaming the wrong end of the leash' has been mauled by one of the dogs after its owner set it on him.” Apparently the guy and his dog both attacked the lad and it wasn’t pretty… I also read that the XL Bully was responsible for over 50% of the deaths caused by dogs in the UK between 2021 and 2023… 😬

[@morgan4360]

I'm pretty sure there is already licensing for more dangerous animals. Couldn't that be done here

[@HeyLaserLips]

I'd trust one of the demon dogs from Ghostbusters over an XL Bully.

[@lordFrog222]

The bullies are training people to organise meetings full of children for them 💀💀💀

[@exzyyd392]

I agree that it's the owners that are the problem but also that the dogs should be banned. It's like the whole "guns don't kill people thing", they don't but it would still be nice if mentally unstable people couldn't easily get their hands on extremely dangerous stuff.

[@Sam-qe2eo]

the issue is that banning the breed is like banning one specific type of gun. the pieces of trash who own out of control bullies will just get some other montrously big and deadly dog

[@danielcrafter9349]

​@@Sam-qe2eo- exactly

[@robyntheslytherin]

​@@Sam-qe2eoban all dogs bigger than a Scottie then, fuck em 😅

[@isopodhours]

@@robyntheslytherin you'll be banning all police dogs, all search and rescue dogs, all guide dogs and all service dogs

[@drewconleymusic]

I know for a fact the vast majority of XL Bullies in the UK will be absolutely fine dogs. The point is, they have the potential to be absolutely lethal, and they're easier to turn into absolute killing machines than most dogs. Most chihuahuas are more violent and aggressive than the XL bullies, but the worst that's going to happen if a chihuahua attacks you is a nip. You can turn just about any dog violent, but the government has good reason to ban the most dangerous ones. The bully walk in Birmingham is almost definitely going to go wrong. I bet there will be at least a few arrogant dickheads who decide to take one there and let it off the lead. If there's no lead on the dog then there's absolutely no stopping them at that size once they start.

[@user-cl5kj7oq6y]

George is one bad day from quoting FBI statistics at this point.

[@Chrissyke]

LOL

[@ensommeille5315]

I truly hate the "why aren't you worrying about murderers?" reasoning used whenever bills like this are passed because a horrifying amount of people don't seem to realise that you can care about multiple things at the same time (and that the PM is not the one responsible for arresting murderers, but y'know)

[@mr.e7005]

There is a massive difference between a shih tsu bite or a golden retivers bite and a bully xl bite. One can't even break the skin, one might leave a scar, and the other will just disembowel you.

[@shortentity6853]

Every single person interviewed in the original video looks either like an edl member or like they would have bullied me in highschool

[@Alex-kv3hl]

they all kept saying "bad dog ownershit" if only there was a way to stop these bad owners from owning the dog. some sort of ban perhaps

[@ensommeille5315]

"In, what, 15 years?" The XL bully was introduced to the UK in 2014....

[@purphex-YT]

love the constant uploads always keeping on scedule

[@carolinesconcertvids860]

"There's been more attacks by Spaniel breeds" *My Springer Spaniel cross walks in* Me: speaking of Spaniels

[@Oli_Guy]

personally, they should not be put down but instead only be put in the hands of responsible and trained owners

[@rinnniiiii]

Not that lady saying she's never seen a nasty XL bully in 15 years when they've only just become popular in the last two or three 😭 She's seriously pulling numbers out of her ass for a redundant point. The fact of the matter is that XL bullies make up less than 1% of dogs in the UK and last year 6 people were killed by them. There were 10 people killed by dogs in total last year. Chihuahuas only killed 2 people full stop between 2005 and 2018. I get that most of them are probably nice and good natured but if you catch one of them when they're feeling a bit grumpy you'd be lucky to leave that encounter with your life

[@rebeccagrace5469]

I do find it sad because it's down to human intervention and selective breeding. I adore bull breeds and have 2 Staffy crosses myself. Aggression is often a result of anxiety, caused by lack of care, socializing or abuse; which people have then bred to make a genetically aggressive dog. The first 16 weeks are the most important for behaviour/ training in any dog's life, no matter the breed. People also need to realize they have Terrier in them, which were bred for hunting small, fast and squeaky animals, which is another reason why they shouldn't be trusted alone or off lead around children; +their history of being bred for fighting. Their size and power is also another factor, my staffy crosses are only small/medium and it's like having 2 small horses. Also, the type of people that own them really don't help, it's usually chavs or some skin head looking dipshit using them as status dogs. Bull breeds can be the sweetest, most loving dogs, but unfortunately as ever, humans have ruined them for their own entertainment. Also, there are 2 Maltese little shits down my road and they will literally try and bite your ankles, but no one bats an eyelid because they're small, but they're nasty bastards. If anyone reads this, sorry for the long rant. I just love dogs and would hate to see genuinely good dogs being destroyed because of some morons who think they're 'hard' because they have a big dog.

[@tortoiseoflegends4466]

Yeah, people who own bully breeds often seem completely blind to the fact that they were selectively bred for fighting. Not guarding or protection or working, but for fighting and killing for entertainment. Nobody would deny that a border collie has herding instincts or that a labrador has retriver instincts. Personally I feel those breeds should be treated like pugs or other poorly bred dogs, and have the harmful traits bred out of them over time.

[@drenter477]

I think the difference with a small feisty dog is that they can’t kill. A majority of the population could relatively easily get a small dog of them, possibly with damages but no that much. Like you said, your dogs are the size of small horses. Try get an aggressive horse of of you.

[@rebeccagrace5469]

@@drenter477 I absolutely agree, I just don't think any dog being aggressive should be acceptable, a small dog could do considerable damage to a baby or small child. It just shows that owners can fail to train any breed and it should be equally judged no matter the size.

[@rebeccagrace5469]

@@drenter477 no, but an attack is an attack

[@rebeccagrace5469]

@@drenter477 so it's okay for a dog to attack someone as long as they don't die?

[@swd2003x]

george being against XL bullies makes me love him even more

[@eclipticcat]

Why would anyone want to own such animals anyway?!

[@aaaahhhhh8143]

probably composating

[@gordonstrong5232]

Small pee pee

[@eclipticcat]

some of the women have them tho. I think it's more just low intelligence; "oh big dog makes me look tough and scary", but also small penile length could be a factor

[@IagreewithDmitri]

I love dogs...but I would also like to watch George take on 40 chihuahuas.

[@morgjones13]

They're upset because they can't breed their dogs and make £1k+ per puppy, it's not really about making the breed live on

[@nicolopiscitelli7042]

As someone that runs a vet clinic I can say these dogs are some of the gentlest animals around. When I see a bulldog I automatically assume it ia a gentle giant because most are. Chihuahua and yorkies and Shibas and Chows. Those are nasty dogs that I approach with caution becuase they almost always bite. Now when a bulldog is aggresive it is a huge issue because of the power they have but honestly then you might as well ban German Sheperds and Irish wolfhounds and Rottweilers and Saint Bernards. Banning a breed does not solve the problem of poor training which is the actual problem. You want to do something about it then make training mandatory for anything bigger then a Golden retriever but don't say something dumb like ban bulldogs because less than a per cent of them are dangerous and the rest are some of the most loyal family dogs you will ever meet. That is just nonsense. Owners are the problem not the dogs. Aggresion is just fear or lack of understanding due to poor training. Dogs want to listen and be loved and a good owner knows that. Also the breeds I mentioned that I am cautious around are because I find people that get them do not know how to train them not that the breeds are bad per se.

[@Tom-jy6mc]

What is with these people. They legitimately have the worst arguments I've ever seen. Individual examples of a population being good (or so they say) aren't an argument against basic regulation for obvious reasons, let alone using whataboutisms about other weaker breeds attacking (no mention of harm or death at all) and actual literal sexual predators/murderers existing as if they're crimes aren't globally outlawed and it's as easy to pick them out of a crowd as spotting a humongous dog. Also I like how some people bring up the owners being at fault as if that's not already something everyone knows; did they think the dogs were the ones held liable for the damages or something? Is the dog going to be charged for it's own license or some shit?

[@eclipticcat]

I love these random videos that George is pushing out rn haha

[@-._A2._-]

I have to disagree with your Labrador take, if a Labrador wanted to it can definitely kill a man with quite some ease.

[@elliebee824]

yeah but if you had to pick XL Bully or a Labrador..

[@-._A2._-]

@@elliebee824 either way I'm screwed if it wants to kill me.

[@isopodhours]

Labradors have killed multiple people

[@angelikaskoroszyn8495]

@elliebee824 Labs usually make guffy, funny faces. They don't look dangerous but I've seen one irritated. Not angry - just irritated. Those teeth can kill

[@nemesimp]

Labs don’t make up 75% of fatal dog attacks… while one breed does. Lab ‘mixes’ however take up 10-13%- BUT- look through shelter dogs and look at all the ‘lab mixes’ shelters will label pitbull type dogs as “””lab mixes””” so that statistic is widely inaccurate…. pure labs take up less than 1%. The highest rate of lab mix? …. Lab x pitbull type dogs. Shock.

[@Elriuhilu]

I can't stop laughing at "I don't think Elton John is a fucken enormous dog that's known for mauling, though."

[@_cupidiot_]

I dont think they should be banned, but there should definitely be licensing and screening for owners.

[@211inprogress]

XL Bully Meet up with kids is the worse idea I've ever heard of. So many of that breed in the same crowded place would be chaos.

[@isopodhours]

There were no xls at the rally

[@RandomPyroYT]

Guys you need to stand for what is rigt!!

[@Ozi_121]

I really wished smart people were louder than dumb people. The world would be better for it.

[@souptime3915]

it's the exact same principle as owning a gun, if you have the necessary licence and shown you are capable of owning one, then you can have one, otherwise it's like giving an AK to a psychopath.

[@jeffery9543]

I fully agree with not giving dogs to people who can't handle/ train them, but at least guns don't die if they're banned, because they'd just be destroying inanimate objects. How many tens of thousands of living animals are about to be slaughtered, and how many more will die because they "look to much like a bully"

[@thegrinderman1090]

​@@jeffery9543 Mate, they're not going to kill any dogs... It'll just be illegal to breed, sell, or give them away. And if you already own one, you just have to register them, have them neutered so they can't breed, and they must wear a muzzle and be on a lead when in public.

[@JToasty777]

The only reason the dogs are acting badly is because the people who own them are training them to be bad. Blame the training not the dog.

[@dr.stephenstrange8471]

Just make a licence for American bully owners. Do background checks on the owner, make sure the environment is suitable for them and that the owners has experience with dogs of this nature, make it so bully owners have to take dog training courses. Because at the end of the day dogs are born to trust and love humans, the only reason why they won’t is because of some sort of trauma or bad experiences in their lives that have led to them to attack humans.

[@ngxreciu9257]

George i love the daily uploads

[@liamlovering3574]

Gotta love george

[@laurablue7893]

Banning means killing the existing ones and can you imagine if your pet who hasn’t done anything wrong was forcibly taken from you and killed?

[@97nialld]

Only scumbags like these type of dogs let’s be real, anyone I have seen with one of these dogs is trying to look tough and come across intimidating. No wonder the owners can’t make a valid argument regarding the ownership of these dogs

[@eclipticcat]

Thanks for talking about this George

[@thatcloveplant]

the name XL Bully sounds dangerous enough

[@CreeperAid]

Sounds like a boss fight

[@isopodhours]

So we're basing an entire dogs temperament off their name? Guess russian black terriers can't possibly be aggressive then even though they were bred as protection dogs for the soviet union, labradors can't be dangerous even though they're gundogs, Jack russells can't be dangerous even though they were bred to flush out foxes and kill small animals, daschunds can't be dangerous even though they were bred to kill badgers, wolfhounds can't be dangerous even though they were bred to kill wolves, borzois can't be dangerous even though they were bred to hunt bears. Need me to continue ?

[@thatcloveplant]

@@isopodhours ok 🤓

[@jamesprice9139]

A few weeks ago my other half and i stopped to say hi to one of these dogs. The guy walking it didnt seem happy with us talking to it in a baby voice and calling it a "good ham" 😂

[@Romantic_Ace]

WOOO UPLOAD

[@tomp6470]

Same vibes as "guns dont kill people' people kill people!" 😂

[@dylanjones6721]

Some good arguments to make These dogs, like others have been bred for a very specific reason which would be for fighting so yes a lot of the blame can go on the owners BUT the dogs are wired a certain way And as for the “it’s only a small percentage” although that’s valid I can guarantee that these are the people that also think ALL Muslims are terrorists…

[@isopodhours]

The xl bully was bred to be a family dog and its predecessors were mostly bred for farm work and livestock guardianship

[@steveo4991]

I’d be more comfortable leaving my child alone in a room with a XL bully than with a nonce worshipper…

[@karachter]

the answer isn't to band a dog breed, it's to screen the owners of massive dogs really intensely, the existence of the dogs isn't the problem, it's the people who are allowed to own them

[@rocksnrolls]

Personally, I've met beautifully trained XL Bully dogs that are the sweetest dogs I've ever met. However, I understand why people are scared of these dogs. They are built like bears and can be deadly. I reckon they should be treated like other dangerous animals (like wolf-dogs, venomous snakes and such) where you need to be licensed and have the knowledge of how to treat and train these dogs, and the facilities to house one to own one. The outright ban is likely to result in a lot of over-breeding before it takes effect. Lots of bad breeding and dogs with mental health problems, making them more likely to attack and bite. This idea of a mass XL Bully march is god damned insane! Especially for these poor dogs. There will be several dogs with unpredictable reactions in one place with a massive amount of noise, smells and sights which will overestimate them, causing issues.

[@EnclosedPoolArea]

The problem here is that venomous snakes and wolf-dogs aren't out among the public like XLs are. If venomous snakes needed to be walked daily, you can bet they would be banned.

[@rocksnrolls]

@@EnclosedPoolArea you're not wrong. I don't know the proper answer, but its a suggestion. Personally, I believe it could work, but then again, I could be wrong

[@Subjagator]

I say do the march and see how they try to spin all their 'great' bully dogs causing mayhem. Great idea all round.

[@rocksnrolls]

@@Subjagator it would result in people likely being hurt and most of those dogs being put down. I'd prefer the least harm and death for these dogs and people.

[@Subjagator]

@@rocksnrolls K

[@jaylowe5026]

I think that its also how they treat the dog or like how the owner treats them, I have many friends who own XL bullys and they are all the sweetest things ever because they are treated nicely

[@morningtime7187]

Some of the issues are so many are "suspected xl bullies" and are never checked. It's just blindly blamed on xl bullies because it was a big looking dog. Another is that this is a distraction ploy by the tories. They want cheap points. Add in xl bullies aren't just a unique dog breed,they were bred from like 5 different dog breeds and so you find a wide variety of temperaments. i support restrictions like banning imports, banning unlicenced breeding, requiring licences for certain ownership but this ban is designed to be a mass cull for tory point scoring and that's pretty gross.

[@paganeyes4245]

I assume they’ll be banning German shepherds next, since once the bully’s are gone those are typically the next most violent.

[@angelikaskoroszyn8495]

My general take is that there're no bad dogs, just bad owners HOWEVER certain breeds require an experienced owner to give the animal right training and socialization. Maybe banning is too much but some breeds definitely need some kind of permit like driving license. Psych eval, quiz test, this kind of thing

[@Cristiano-Is-Number1]

Yeah Like Guns

[@h4sty493]

the take that theres no bad dogs just bad owners is just plain wrong

[@Cristiano-Is-Number1]

@@h4sty493 Exactly

[@TechBaffle]

7:40 Confirmed Memeulous follows himself on Twitter 😂

[@jahfrenelkins2978]

I think the main problem is the people and not the dogs because some people buy pitbulls and don't displine them because when trained they can be lovely sweet breeds it's on the owners who can't train their dogs properly

[@jackhemm98]

the people at the protest are basically just self owning that they don’t train their dogs and its their fault

[@dishelved]

@@jackhemm98how…

[@jackhemm98]

@@dishelved because the protesters are saying ‘it’s not the dogs fault it’s the owners’. they are owners lol

[@elliebee824]

People said the same thing about pet tigers and chimpanzees… cant ‘train’ an animalistic instinct away

[@dishelved]

@@jackhemm98 okay? but they aren’t referring to themselves obviously they are referring to the owners in which let their dogs be aggressive. it isn’t that hard to understand what they are saying.

[@cordeliacarroll4856]

These dogs aren’t violent, my massive scar on my ankle is telling me other wise💀

[@ivorleak8823]

I was bitten as a child by our family Boxer, it was my fault apparently for what I did to it but the poor dog suffered a gruesome ending because of the real animal in out family home.

[@conormurphy4328]

It is kinda funny that they’re all the exact same type of person

[@ellisdaborn431]

People shouldn't be able to own dogs they cant control, don't see why anyone could disagree with that lmao

[@isopodhours]

It depends on how you treat the dog, and wether dog is from a reputable breeder. Most large dog owners I've met have more control over their dog then alot small dog owners who let their ankle biters run around causing chaos to other people. And before you say 'they're not as powerful as an xl' - they can still kill young kids and dogs pretty easily, if not cause serious harm l

[@ellisdaborn431]

@@isopodhourstotally agree just wish these dogs wouldn't fall into the hands of the wrong people

[@TechBaffle]

5:54 My spaniel Marley would have you for breakfast 😂😂 But that's only because he's greedy as hell!

[@BreadMan43]

Why is camouflage spelt ‘camouflage’ and not

[@skiibo8496]

I’m a firm believer in the phrase “there are no bad dogs, just bad owners” but damn, this is a bit much

[@Cristiano-Is-Number1]

No No No This Dog Is A Machine Made By God And Is Designed To Kill, Hunt Its Prey And Then Visciously Maul It

[@enzoforgets9456]

If you cannot train your pet, dont get it, dont blame the dog, blame the human, honestly. Id be so down for ciminal charges at the owners As someone with two pit bull shar peis, who are trained well, they always wait for our family to react before getting aggressive Tldr train ur dogs

[@jacobmoore4493]

It's just that if you blame the owners after the fact then the damage is already done; a child, adults, dogs life lost or maimed. Negligent owners are punished, always have been and clearly it isn't working.

[@enzoforgets9456]

@@jacobmoore4493 they arent punished enough. Simple as that. Call my views strong but you raise the dog, letting it go wild like that and not do anything should be a high level punishment, especially if someone loses their life

[@Subjagator]

Muzzle the dogs. Strict leash laws. Mandatory spaying/neutering unless you are a registered and regulated breeder.

[@chazer0075]

I don't agree with the protesters but considering his speech the other day, comparing Rishi to Hitler isn't completely inaccurate.

[@olliesidaway]

To be devils advocate here, the dog breed is not helped by the kind of people owning them. There is a saying of “there are no bad dogs just bad owners” and there is truth and falsity to that. Yes, the kind of people who own XL Bullies probably shouldn’t be trusted with them and with good owners, the issues that the breed has would be nowhere near the degree it is today but in the other hand, the dog was bred for that purpose. I agree with George that there should be some sort of licence to own them and be treated like hunting dogs rather than domestic dogs

[@Minceraft69]

I do agree. Huge dogs like this are idiot magnets. The people who buy them are primarily (not always) unintelligent people who won't settle for anything other than a huge, intimidating animal - either ignorant parents who want Cerberus as the family pet to look cool and tough and can't be arsed doing their research, or drug dealers who want a massive chunk of muscle as a bodyguard. Either way, the dogs are often not trained well (or not trained with the strictness that a huge dog like that should be), meaning that even if the dogs ARE well behaved and well meaning, they're big and powerful enough that they could easily kill or main a human or dog without even meaning to, when provoked or over excited. There is no room for error with them. If anyone less than an expert has one and the owner slips up, the bully is put down (when it's not necessarily even the bully's fault), and someone else is seriously injured. They should at the very least be licensed and regulated and only given out to people who have proven they are capable of controlling dangerous animals. They should not be household pets or bred in backyards

[@ZiggaMau]

I can see both sides honestly, I have a friend with an XL Bully and it wouldn't hurt a fly. However, when not raised right their size makes them very dangerous. So I'd say education and regulation are the way to go, not banning an entire breed of dogs.

[@benpriest1418]

I feel like the Saville argument is somewhat relevant....the government can push this through no issue. So for pedos why not castration? Why not longer sentences?

[@legster983]

The problem is their are a few people that use these dogs as fighting dogs and security dogs so they will do harm ( I’ve seen it myself ) basically only really responsible people should be allowed to have the dogs

[@matheuslcfc242]

Rottweilers and Dobermans are 100% capable of killing a man, even an alsatian. I get the point you're making George but I have to disagree.

[@feather9115]

Exactly. Even huskeys and retrievers could rip up a human easily.

[@IMayBeSlightlyAutism]

George can we go to greggs

[@HoppingSkipper]

Get this man his sausage roll

[@Jets_Archive]

Pick me up a steak bake please

[@heatran4109]

How could he say no?

[@noahwain2308]

My order is a dr pepper, steak bake and a pack of punchy paprika please 😋

[@IMayBeSlightlyAutism]

@@Jets_Archive solid

[@bobbimega]

Its really difficult to be prime minister and this problem comes up because if you dont do anything, people will die but if you do something, people will get mad

[@UnfoundFilms]

Well Rishi wasn’t elected so if he doesn’t like it he’s welcome to leave and let the people choose an actual leader.

[@bobbimega]

​@@UnfoundFilmsTruly

[@ivorleak8823]

Lol, chihuahuas are deadly, ever tried eating a full one 😂😂😂😂

[@drippyad4910]

'Not the dog, its the owner' is the exact same argument that Americans have after a mass shooting

[@funkymongoose7099]

Is it though, would you rather be in an enclosed space with a heavily abused dog that’s been in hundreds of dog fights or a dog from a loving household.

[@Shezza_1212]

@@funkymongoose7099if the abused dog is a chihuahua and the loving household one is an XL toddler destroyer then I would probably go with the first option

[@generaalnaarling]

@@funkymongoose7099I'd rather be alone in a room with a gun than with a dog. 😂

[@Swedishmafia101MemeCorporation]

Well a gun doesn't run off and shoot someone by itself

[@funkymongoose7099]

@@Shezza_1212 You’re a bit dull aren’t you?