Doing the math to prove it’s a 90 degree V8 when pictures already exist is peak Jason
@PKConnolly19 ай бұрын
Bro doesn’t need eyes to see the world, just numbers
@CyanRooper9 ай бұрын
"THE NUMBERS M̶A̶S̶O̶N̶ JASON!!! WHAT DO THEY MEAN?"
@AM-uk7jv9 ай бұрын
A necessary precaution to silence the loud ignorant trolls who live by the Dunning Kruger Effect.
@AadidevSooknananNXS9 ай бұрын
I laughed@@CyanRooper
@rondavis27919 ай бұрын
Dudes like neo see's every thing in code
@starvalkyrie9 ай бұрын
Company : "We're not currently releasing the official specs to the public" Jason, equipped with a promo image and a whiteboard : "You absolute fools"
@EngineeringExplained9 ай бұрын
😂😂
@kaiwalpanchal58729 ай бұрын
can't beat physics lol
@v4skunk7399 ай бұрын
8.3 V16 built by Cosworth.
@ghoulbuster19 ай бұрын
He is ALWAYS two steps ahead
@456MrPeople9 ай бұрын
To be fair, the insider information given by the customers was also helpful.
@brrrrr99999 ай бұрын
2:25 "69% larger, nice" Not even a smirk. Amazing.
@Rgdarkchild9 ай бұрын
Nice
@nicmainville99549 ай бұрын
He's not a man of culture, he's a gentleman of culture.
@Maxst33le9 ай бұрын
Nice
@SCARFACE692479 ай бұрын
Nice
@OfficialCDTPlayer9 ай бұрын
Nice
@walking_man9 ай бұрын
I own a BMW i5 M60 and the 600 hp is more than I have ever experienced. A Bugatti with 1000hp aspirated PLUS 1000hp electric will be unimaginable.
@AndyPat2399 ай бұрын
exactly
@pmudri9 ай бұрын
unimaginable? there are 2000hp cars already.
@thenamelessking78739 ай бұрын
@pmudri no there's 2000hp machines not cars. This car has AC name another 2000hp car with AC
@TheEchelon9 ай бұрын
@@pmudri That's not what he meant. The experience is unimaginable for someone who has never driven a car that powerful.
@1harrismccarty9 ай бұрын
@@pmudri I don’t think there are any 2000hp cars that have half of that power available instantaneously. I suppose any car with that much power is going to be acceleration limited by available traction tho.
@galazoulay84989 ай бұрын
Accidentally synchronized our “nice” out of instincts. I’m dying 😂💀 @2:26
@OdyTypeR9 ай бұрын
I was like "jinx". 😁 I think we _all_ said it out loud at the same time 😂. His timing was perfect. And the nonchalant delivery was 🤌.
@howitworks36079 ай бұрын
I’m glad they numbered the cylinders so it will be super easy for my local mechanic to work on
@stuffhappens56819 ай бұрын
This is not soup for you!
@rudolfvanderven9 ай бұрын
Hell, might as well work on it yourself at this point really
@loganstuckey7309 ай бұрын
Laughed out loud when I read this 😂
@benjackson62609 ай бұрын
Just imagine if it got combined with the Light Speed Transmission from Koenigsegg... If u wanna compare any transmission sounds, then I would say none can beat that one... So in my opinion the light speed transmission could be paired well with the massive thrust produced by the Bugatti V16... That's if these 2 can put their rivalries aside😅😂
@wafiqM9 ай бұрын
You sure you can afford it bud?
@alecsandstedt60209 ай бұрын
Bugatti took the creation of the Koenigsegg Gemera personally 💀
@Shadsuna9 ай бұрын
This doesn't aim to be a practical hypercar that can be used as a daily driver just as easily as a raceway rocket, though...
@alexluke849 ай бұрын
Not the same buyers target
@gottliebdee2639 ай бұрын
@@alexluke84 Not the point. They did not want to be outdone at any cost.
@IAG3699 ай бұрын
Only thing left is to make a 4 seat vehicle..
@alexluke849 ай бұрын
@@IAG369still the fastest car with more than 2people is McLaren Speedtail...delivered to all few years ago...Gemera is far from production...and Bugatti doesnt bother with 4seaters
@rolfknappmann9 ай бұрын
2:21 - that "nice" was so casual, yet so effective, i love it
@corpsie-diytools389 ай бұрын
Let's get this on a tray
@benjadonnelly23849 ай бұрын
I’m glad I wasn’t the only one who noticed
@DrCheeks9 ай бұрын
Bro, gotta say, the neatness, precision, layout and use of colour on your whiteboard display is as impressive as your engineering knowledge
@JamesJDMoe7 ай бұрын
no cap!
@therealmudafuka72006 ай бұрын
Lecturer/ teacher spotted
@EthanWest1879 ай бұрын
Just saw your video from 11 years ago explaining the hemi. Read the comments where you were talking about being an engineer and i decided to check to see if youre still making videos, and you are! Glad you stuck with it!
@EngineeringExplained9 ай бұрын
Ha - things worked out okay! Appreciate the kind words! :)
@aarondavies84869 ай бұрын
@EngineeringExplained didn't rolls make this v16 engine back in the early 2000s they put it in a rolls in a film rowin Atkinson where he played a spy
@infosecrogue88839 ай бұрын
“The turbos are 69% larger…nice” 😂
@roteroktober3609 ай бұрын
Totally caught me off guard 😂😂
@jeffb77889 ай бұрын
snuck it in there 😂 guy’s a legend
@Xeonerable9 ай бұрын
I just love how saying "...nice" whenever the number 69 comes up has become such a widespread thing, it's hilarious.
@TheFunLuvnCRIMINAL9 ай бұрын
Nice.
@MJ-rr4hd9 ай бұрын
thats a very good number 😂
@mgcharoudin9 ай бұрын
It looks sooooo good. And sounds too😍
@_IMNNO9 ай бұрын
Did Mate give any sneak peeks off camera?
@TheFuxxoWorksGarage9 ай бұрын
will you be driving one on the ring soon? 😲
@Proparkourgamer9 ай бұрын
tell Rimac to let you drive one in the green hell
@shameernazar44669 ай бұрын
Waiting for your ring lap ❤
@benjackson62609 ай бұрын
Just imagine if it got combined with the Light Speed Transmission from Koenigsegg... If u wanna compare any transmission sounds, then I would say none can beat that one... So in my opinion the light speed transmission could be paired well with the massive thrust produced by the Bugatti V16... That's if these 2 can put their rivalries aside😅😂
@seancurry31389 ай бұрын
“Was all this a waste…. Maybe.”😂😂😂 this guy is brilliant and subtlety hilarious. Awesome job.
@vitamc12139 ай бұрын
You have no idea how happy I am. Bugatti are singlehandedly keeping engineering marvels alive.
@pietskiet42-_9 ай бұрын
You have never heard of Koenigsegg? 😅😅😅
@vitamc12139 ай бұрын
@@pietskiet42-_ Yeah, building 3-cylinder cars... 🥱
@spencera22049 ай бұрын
Koenigsegg is
@theMelvinShow9 ай бұрын
There are a lot of companies „keeping engineering marvels alive”. Everyone is just doing that in their own field. Maybe you are biased against that and are therefore not recgnizing it.
@adrianbyron-parker57979 ай бұрын
Or Cosworth @@pietskiet42-_
@meekrab90279 ай бұрын
"Why go with this V16 Hybrid strategy?" Because it's badass?
@granttaylor81796 ай бұрын
Because no other car manufacturer is using a 16 Cylinder engine.
@youkofoxy9 ай бұрын
Now we need a W 24 engine. Just 8 more.
@interstate80.9 ай бұрын
OOOOOO OOOOOO -/_/-/_/-/_/- OOOOOO OOOOOO
@RedfishCarolina9 ай бұрын
It'd be a lot easier to just buy two of these V16s and put them together. Play your cards right and you could make it a W32
@itsdokko29909 ай бұрын
at that point, we should use 2 engines only to power a generator, just like with the Belaz 75710
@Appletank89 ай бұрын
or rotate 3 of them to get a Radial-48
@erkinalp9 ай бұрын
why not a 2 stroke opposed piston inline 12?
@kylecordes9 ай бұрын
It's not so much that the downsides don't matter, it's that they aren't even downsides. This is a vehicle for which being excessively expensive to buy, expensive to maintain, expensive to drive, and insanely complicated is an advantage. It will make the vehicle more desirable. It is an exceptionally large peacock tail, in vehicle form.
@EngineeringExplained9 ай бұрын
Yep, exactly.
@inevespace9 ай бұрын
If I buy a rusted car with a dying engine for huge money and repair holes on chassis one by one when a place cracked. And repair engine only cylinder by cylinder so that it become expensive to maintain. Does it becomes a peacock tail?
@cademckee72769 ай бұрын
@@inevespaceDoes it have a Bugatti badge and cost over a million to buy?
@mullayho17599 ай бұрын
@@inevespace Vintage cars are like that and some go for huge amounts of money
@jppagetoo9 ай бұрын
It was nearly impossible to get insurance to drive the Veyron or Konegg. Nobody will insure this for the road. Amazing engineering, complete showoff design, and useless for anything but "drive it" date on a closed track. Drive it a few laps then it's back to the shop for $100K in maintenance and new tires.
@johnburns40179 ай бұрын
V16 in this day and age? I see the VW Group is being adventurous.
@dennisallen83339 ай бұрын
Yippie! I’m tired of some of these boring cars!
@Dqtube9 ай бұрын
It can be tough when you're still living in an era where Bugatti owns VW Group. Try to update your dataset.
@johnburns40179 ай бұрын
@@Dqtube You need to read and _understand_ what I wrote.
@crackedemerald49309 ай бұрын
@@Dqtubei thought VW owned Bugatti, and not the other way around
@ihavealife0029 ай бұрын
@@crackedemerald4930 VW group owned Bugatti, but they sold it to Rimac. There isn't a car company on this planet that could buy VW group.
@giuseppegargiulo48745 ай бұрын
Hi, i have done my calculi, and i have concluded that each bank (which, as you said, is kind of a straight8 cross-X plane, with all the pistons evenly distributed every 45 degrees) has a primary rocking couple. Option 1: If they didn't phase the V8 called A and the one called B by 45 degress and they actually mirrored it, they could have really balanced EVERYTHING, primary and secondary forces and moments. But if they did this, 2 pistons would have fired at the same time. Maybe the problem is the torsional stress on the crankshaft, so they opted to balance things by adding weight to the cranskshaft in order to have a smoother firing. Option 2: Another option would have been two inline8 banks with a 90 degrees angle (i suppose they didn't want to have a 45 degrees like the cadillac, because of its shape), but in that case, they would have had the same problem of 2 pistons firing at the same time. In this last case, the only difference with option 1 is that we are switching piston 3 with piston 4, so it's the same. Is it correct? PS, the cadillac V16 is actually a "more pefect" mechanic object. PPS, nothing is better than a V12, which is designed by God himself.
@FloreFaune9 ай бұрын
Love your videos Jason! A while ago you inspired me to get more into engineering and for that I am very grateful. Another excellent video
@jakescotto179 ай бұрын
I had no idea 2 came after 1. I think that's an underrated discovery from this video, thank you! Putting your degree to WORK
@snowgorilla97899 ай бұрын
Carefull you'll get called racist
@jokwonpope15619 ай бұрын
@@snowgorilla9789mathist
@alexrosario76619 ай бұрын
U think ur better than us cuz ur white ?
@erik91089 ай бұрын
I got a laugh out of that line too!
@AudreyH489 ай бұрын
The instant torque of electric and that gorgeous sound of that v16. Pretty hyped to see what this car will look like!
@joe13c00l29 ай бұрын
@AudreyH48 maybe a road-legal Bolide complying with emissions and stuff?
@XXXPUBLICENEMY9 ай бұрын
It will be lenght of the Titanic probably
@isaac42739 ай бұрын
@@XXXPUBLICENEMY sounds great to me, give me the land yacht
@lerr001jr79 ай бұрын
So short, this thing is gonna be a beast
@fafiteee9 ай бұрын
@Harrappathat would be quite the achievement if they managed to shove a v16 into roughly the same sized hole as a w16
@leftcoaster679 ай бұрын
Cizeta Moroder V16T had a V16 in the 1990s. Depends if you consider 13 units "production". It was 4 banks of 4, so 32 valve, octo-cam engine. Claudio Zampolli was nuts.
@CyanRooper9 ай бұрын
Rare cars are still considered production vehicles even when they are made in single digit numbers.
@electrikoptik9 ай бұрын
I used to own a Cizeta Moroder V16T In Gran Turismo 4
@tomkandy9 ай бұрын
It's contentious whether that's even a proper V16 - had two cranks, four cams, and central power shaft. It's more like 2 V8s in one block.
@PrinceAlhorian9 ай бұрын
@@tomkandyso they were bonkers enough to fit two engines in one car... Legendary!
@ThaDutchDK19899 ай бұрын
It where 2 Lamborghini 4.0 V8 uraco engines and mated together the gearbox was in the middle ..
@UncleManuel9 ай бұрын
That smirk after "Maybe." was just saying "because I can". 😁🤟
@antoninbesse7959 ай бұрын
At approx 10 minutes in I experienced a subtle transition from incomprehensible to hypnotic. Couldn’t stop watching - love your videos Jason.
@Ren_11069 ай бұрын
How much more cylinders do you want? Bugatti: Yes. 😂
@notsafefortorque90609 ай бұрын
its the same tho. 16. Just in a V config.
@CyanRooper9 ай бұрын
During the early days of the Veyron's development they considered using an 18 cylinder engine before deciding "nah, that's too much" and so they decided on a far more sensible 16 cylinder engine instead.
@jwalster94129 ай бұрын
@@notsafefortorque9060 Classic VW over complicating a 16 cylinder.
@jwalster94129 ай бұрын
@@CyanRooper10 is the limit. Anything above that is over complicating.
@Nordlicht059 ай бұрын
17 please
@hugolafhugolaf9 ай бұрын
I wonder if that would fit in my Fiat 500?
@digitalzomb9 ай бұрын
If your mounts start at the dash maybe
@feedbackzaloop9 ай бұрын
VAG parts in Stellantis???
@R033339 ай бұрын
@@feedbackzaloopeuro beat gives access to powers unknown
@foxmnguni34969 ай бұрын
It will as long as u gon drive it from the outside😂
@EngineeringExplained9 ай бұрын
There's always a chance!
@Rezcuz9 ай бұрын
No way are Cosworth making another insane engine... GOATs
@abarratt88699 ай бұрын
They're certainly knocking it out of park at the moment. Two amazing *emissions compliant* NA V12s for Aston Martin and Gordon Murray. Why not sling 4 more pots on for Bugatti?! It'd be interesting to see the inlet plenum in detail; I think that's where their combustion witchcraft is hidden.
@jamescorderjr12749 ай бұрын
I mean Cosworth making insane engines is kinda their MO
@abarratt88699 ай бұрын
@@jamescorderjr1274 certainly is, but they're surely in a golden age right now. Makes me wonder what Ferrari will do, they'd love an engine like these (the V12 certainly) in one of their cars, but can they do it or would they too have to make the pilgrimage to Northampton and Cosworth's reception desk?
@falcongamer589 ай бұрын
Are there other engine builders other than cosworth? It seems to me they're the only ones mentioned when people talk about dedicated engine builders
@Rezcuz9 ай бұрын
@@falcongamer58 Because they're the best. Go google other ones.
@jimmylongname9 ай бұрын
Excellent video Jason. Was feeling underwhelmed waking up today, but this made my day, great content, perfectly presented.
@OG_Pharaoh_Blaq9 ай бұрын
Beautiful engineering its not until i watched this video that i truly got to understand the complexity of these engines
@patrickshaw85959 ай бұрын
You are maturing as a lecturer Young Man. Congratulations. That was one of the best I ever saw on my favorite subject.
@EngineeringExplained9 ай бұрын
Thanks for the kind words!
@lg29829 ай бұрын
Man that was an awesome video. I was really glued to the screen. Especially how the firing order is mirrored. It makes so much sense when you understand it. Thank you.
@EngineeringExplained9 ай бұрын
Very happy to hear it, appreciate ya watching!
@CFSlayer23Studios504239 ай бұрын
Him: "The turbo chargers were 69% larger." Me: Nice Him: Nice Me 😄
@v4skunk7399 ай бұрын
No idea why you are talking about turbos. The Cosworth V16 is naturally aspirated.
@shiftyhexahedron78919 ай бұрын
Also Me: Nice
@itsdokko29909 ай бұрын
@@v4skunk739 jason was comparing the W16 engines from the Veyron/Chiron
@laurencemoore21059 ай бұрын
I see what they did there, they wanted not just forced induction, but rizz induction too....
@colinvanful9 ай бұрын
twin oversized turboes are actualy quad turboes . i think imhop if you want the best output just use a good old fashoned charger
@vhjioa9 ай бұрын
That firing order breakdown was a work of art!
@CALVINBYKELVIN9 ай бұрын
Jason, thank you very much for taking the time to explain this. It is very interesting. Your explanations of the firing order of the cylinders & how they balance each other reminded me of counterpoint in the music of JS Bach. Thank You.
@tbh14449 ай бұрын
Love you, love your videos, love engineering and learning. My Croatian buddies want me to tell you that Mate Rimac is pronounced Ma-tay Ree-match. The way you said it makes him sound like an Australian bloke clearing his throat.
@EngineeringExplained9 ай бұрын
This comment is 10/10, thank you! And appreciate the correction.
@user-xj7ms2hy7l9 ай бұрын
It's Ree-matz
@isaac42739 ай бұрын
I was trying to read that phonetically at first, then I double read it and realized "hold up, it's Croatian, I just have to sound it out like a heterosexual Slovenian" 😂
@CanadianN1NJ49 ай бұрын
It's not "ree-match" it's "ree-mah-ts" as it doesn't have an accent on the c at the end
@Thomas_Abel_Anderson9 ай бұрын
In 1938, Cadillac completely re-engineered the V-16, brought out a flathead design on a 135-degree plan. It was nearly an opposed 16, gave much lower silhouette, put most accessories on top. Two downright carbs helped give 185 hp. Only 514 L-head V16s were sold. A V-12 wasn't made during this time, and Cadillac dropped this 431-inch V-16 completely by end of 1940.
@Prestiged_peck9 ай бұрын
A 430 inch engine making 185 horsepower is absolutely depressing
@spadeespada94329 ай бұрын
@@Prestiged_peck Not back then.
@The1trueDave9 ай бұрын
@@Prestiged_peck I'm fairly sure the straight-8 Duesenberg* was making 250+ (in NA form) the best part of a decade earlier. Mind you those 2 carbs in the Cadillac must have been working hard to supply 8 cylinders each! *also around 430 ci IIRC...
@jakelee54569 ай бұрын
The Cadillac V16 wasn't so much about outright power, but supreme smoothness.
@hendo3379 ай бұрын
@@The1trueDaveDusenberg was 420ci 6.9L 265hp N/A, it was DOHC, the 430ci Cadillac 135deg V16 was flat head and it made the same 185hp as the late 452ci OHV 45deg V16 and it started at only 165hp. The V16s were significantly less expensive, low rpm engines designed to effortlessly at low rpms move around a huge limousine with only 3 gears in a time where it was uncommon to travel faster than 70mph, more of a truck engine, where the Dusenberg was like a double Offenhouser I4 or an aero engine that ran at higher rpms and depended upon breathing to make the 265 and 300 gross HP while still being acceptably tractable down low in a heavy vehicle.
@andresilvasophisma9 ай бұрын
I remember seeing videos from Mate about starting modding cars in his garage, he's now presenting Bugatti cars. Crazy.
@chrisrib056 ай бұрын
Today, Bugatti revealed the specs and maths are all correct
@davidhill57989 ай бұрын
One of my all-time favorite engineers! It takes real genius to be able to digest the computation and physics of engineering, and turn it into something genuinely enthusiastic. Well done, Jason!
@markplott48209 ай бұрын
3x Electric motors , BEAT any ICE Engine.
@xrmerkur9 ай бұрын
thanks for the thorough overview with your signature explanation process.
@JSFGuy9 ай бұрын
You haven't even watched it yet.
@EngineeringExplained9 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@xrmerkur9 ай бұрын
@@EngineeringExplained74.4 lb per liter is extremely solid. i’m curious to know as well if it indeed is naturally aspirated. you always do a phenomenal job breaking down the details.
@LuGer2129 ай бұрын
shut up. dude got a like and heart-thingy and followed up afterwards. go weep,@@JSFGuy
@thatparticulargame60017 ай бұрын
@@EngineeringExplained hey mate cheers, why haven't you done the Chiron 300+ video calculations huh? I wonder why, well, I made them myself 😁 and is a complete lie I hope you do a video on it, if you really don't care about views... "The Bugatti Chiron Super Sport 300+ did indeed achieve a record speed of 304.773 mph (490.484 km/h) during a test run in 2019. However, the customer version of the Chiron Super Sport 300+ is electronically simited to a top speed of 273 mph (440 km/h) for safety and regulatory reasons. To determine if the Chiron Super Sport 300+ could theoretically achieve 305 mph (493 km/h) without the electronic limiter, we need to consider the factors involved: 1. Aerodynamic Drag: Drag Coefficient: Approximately 0.35 Frontal Area: -2.4 square meters Alr Density: 1.225 kilograms per cubic meter 2. Power Output: 1,577 horsepower (1,176 kilowatts) Calculations: Using the drag equation: Power of Drag = Air Density x Drag Coefficient × Frontal Area × Velocity For 306 mph (138.62 meters per second): Power of Drag = x 1.225 x 0.36 x 2.4 x (136.62) Power of Drag 674, 198 Watts Power of Drag 2,078 kiloWatts Comparison with Available Power: The Chiron Super Sport 300+ engine produces 1,176 kilowatts. For achieving 306 mph, the car would need approximately 2,078 kilowatts, which is significantly higher than the engine's output Conclusion: The calculations show that while the Chiron Super Sport 300+ can achieve very high speeds, reaching 306 mph (493 km/h) would require more power than the car's engine can provide. This Implies that without additional power and overcoming other practical limitations (such as tire Integrity and safety concerns), the Chiron Super Sport 300+ cannot achieve 306 mph. Therefore, the 304.775 mph achieved during the test run was a significant accompitshment under highly controlled conditions, but pushing beyond this to 306 mph is not feasible with the current power and design constraints of the vehicle."
@vizualjockey44199 ай бұрын
I can imagine trade schools and university engineering courses seriously using your videos in their curriculum. I'm an armchair mechanic myself, but it's information like this that allows me to understand and geek out even more about this stuff. I'd love more information about motorcycle and industrial power plants as well. Armed with a whiteboard, nothing can stop you! Also, have you thought about a collaboration with Mark Rober?
@varunmodela20479 ай бұрын
I could listen to you talking about engines all day long man!! Just pure bliss.
@garybulwinkle829 ай бұрын
Half way through and I'm lost!! Better start over!!
@zeroconduction9 ай бұрын
Personally, I think it would be cool to see something like this be able to have distinctive modes. A 100% full blown push the brain into the back of your skull mode and a mode that could get you 40 mpg. Imagine having a green and a red key for your Bugatti so you could also get 400 miles to the tank if you were so inclined... just because you could.
@talalzero14189 ай бұрын
Car conpanies: we’re moving to clean energy low footprint electric and hybrid vehicles Bugatti: look at this sick new V16 engine we just made 😁
@jamesolivier31929 ай бұрын
I'm really happy you are still putting out content. I've been watching your channel since the beginning!
@janphilipp869 ай бұрын
When Mate Rimac said they were developing something unique and new I was hoping for a star engine 😅. Laid on its side, with like 9 cylinders at least, turbocharged and electrical valves
@diegorhoenisch629 ай бұрын
I believe what you are describing as a star engine is formally known as a radial engine. They were popular in aviation in the 1940s and 50s.
@raullasvegas9 ай бұрын
That also sound like something Christian would make and not Mate
@MyHvorfor9 ай бұрын
I am studying chemical engineering, and I absolutely love your videos man! If you don't mind, I would be glad to see some more chemistry related stuff :D I really enjoyed your videos about the Li-ion batteries.
@EngineeringExplained9 ай бұрын
Chemistry has always been tough for me! I've got a battery video going on in the background, and the chemistry is ooof!
@MyHvorfor9 ай бұрын
Haha, I know the feeling! For me it has always been statics and dynamics that have been challenging @@EngineeringExplained
@jaysosaaa79756 ай бұрын
this guy actually got the horsepower bang on wow
@denalidriven15749 ай бұрын
I don’t think most will understand this level of explanation and ability to switch this level of thought process between each matrix is just mind bending.
@NinjaRunningWild9 ай бұрын
Cosworth is on fire lately. Making some of the best engines out there. The GMA T50… 🤤😍
@Slizzo829 ай бұрын
Lately? Man that's always been their game.
@NinjaRunningWild9 ай бұрын
@@Slizzo82 They haven't been represented anywhere I or most other car enthusiasts care about until recently. No Cosworth in Ferrari, Lamborghini, Bugatti, Porsche, et al. Whatever niche area you're referring to no one cares about.
@lorddoobsworth1449 ай бұрын
@@NinjaRunningWild maybe not in your country but worldwide they have for a very long time (since at least the 80s)
@a_bad_word9 ай бұрын
Man, time and time again you prove yourself to be one of the best channels on KZbin. Having access to information like this is one of the few ways the internet contributes positively to the world, in my opinion.
@EngineeringExplained9 ай бұрын
So so warming to read - means a lot to me, thank you!!
@Shadsuna9 ай бұрын
@EngineeringExplained :: Not sure if anyone pointed this out already, but as a native speaker of Serbo-Croatian, I can tell you two things - 1) Mate Rimac is pronounced as Muh-teh Ree-mah-ts ; 2) The phrasing Mate used in conjunction with the emoticon may actually translate to something along the lines of "oh, that's rich...", as that specific phrasing is very often used sarcastically, much more so than its direct meaning as a praise. Just thought I'd throw a spanner in the works :D
@EngineeringExplained9 ай бұрын
Thanks! I included the original comment because translations often aren't directly accurate, so appreciate you chiming in! Were you to guess, does the language sound affirmative or more like "no way"? Because I think even sarcastically you might say "oh wow now THAT would be cool ;)" in a way that's like hey please don't spill all the details just yet.
@randomnik709 ай бұрын
@@EngineeringExplained I added a separate comment, but in most cases it translates to something like a playful "nice try, although you're wrong". BTW your numbers were very conservative. 1000+1000 is much too low. They'll probably push for 2x electric 750hp each, plus 1500 combustion. They have to make a crazier car than Koenigsegg's ~2300 HP.
@Shadsuna9 ай бұрын
@@EngineeringExplained I had posted a follow-up, but it contained a link to another comment on Facebook, which might be why KZbin mods (or even you) deleted it. Anyway, the gist of it was that Mate Rimac seems to be very stingy with responding to comments on his posts, and the response I had linked was one confirming the engine is N/A with a simple "Yep." to one of the commenters in an earlier post Rimac had made. The only other direct response he gave to commenters about any of this was along the lines of "all shall be revealed in due time". This all leads me to believe that the commenter you pointed out (Heinz Schenk) was onto something, and the snarky sarcastic handwave was probably a misdirection attempt. I can't be sure about the electric engine(s) power figure(s), but I do think you're just about correct; something tells me Bugatti-Rimac didn't go through the trouble of designing such an elaborate ICE powertrain just to have it play second fiddle to the electric subsystem - I doubt they'd want it overshadowed by the electric motors. @randomnik70 :: I doubt Jason overestimated the engine power, given how simple the intake manifolds and the valvetrain look; to get much more efficiency without traditional forced induction, they'd have to have an elaborate variable valve timing and duration system with some huge valves/ports and also probably rammed air (scooped from the front and inducted into the manifolds), as what Jason proposes is already pushing it in terms of volumetric efficiency.
@tamasszabo88249 ай бұрын
Máté is a Hungarian name, as well.
@ElMistroFeroz9 ай бұрын
A V16 engine nowadays is like a super rare powerful horse when the model T was mass produced. There comes a point when the limiting factor are the tires, not the engine.
@samuelrodriguez66849 ай бұрын
The idea of Bugatti having hard time counting is honestly hilarious, and it could explain why they made a V16 and not something smaller.
@ToyotatechDK9 ай бұрын
In all the years I’ve seen your videos this one is really really well made. Your knowledge and ability to explain is incredible. Greetings from Denmark 🇩🇰
@EngineeringExplained9 ай бұрын
Cheers, thanks for watching and appreciate the kind words!!
@hanstubben9 ай бұрын
The review of this Bugatti need to be Jason² !
@EngineeringExplained9 ай бұрын
Oohh, I'd love that!
@Harry_Gersack9 ай бұрын
That'd be really cool. Those two have such a good dynamic
@muxiku9 ай бұрын
Cosworth are the masters of NA engines in this era, if you want a good NA engine go to Cosworth.
@N4CR9 ай бұрын
Or Judd.
@joelkumparak9 ай бұрын
I can confirm from my friend who works at Bugatti it’s a 1000hp na motor with 1000hp duel electric hub motors at each front wheel. I got to see a video of the first start up at cossworths engine Dyno over a year ago
@stonedboss47659 ай бұрын
wow this was so much fun to watch! thanks for the awesome video
@gosho54499 ай бұрын
2:26 very nice
@Foulback29 ай бұрын
Can you make a video on the pistonless engine omega 1? Would love to have your take on this.
@joe13c00l29 ай бұрын
What has the world come to..... Pistonless engines? Wtf man
@Foulback29 ай бұрын
@joe13c00l2 with engines that use pistons, there is a lot of reciprocating mass and with the omega 1 it spins in one direction, making it a more efficient motor. Thus more power for the same amount of work.
@PrinceAlhorian9 ай бұрын
@@joe13c00l2It's called a Wankel Rotary, not a piston in sight. 80 year old tech.
@joe13c00l29 ай бұрын
Shoot...I forgot about rotary engines...i always thought of the dorito as a piston tho...@@PrinceAlhorian
@JoshuaTootell9 ай бұрын
Turbines are technically piston less internal combustion engines too...
@mranvick35129 ай бұрын
THANK YOU for another high-quality, old-style, whiteboard video instead of a not-so-well-sounding unmounted vlog :D (the explanations are crystal-clear, great work)
@cleanthegreen9 ай бұрын
Oh darn. I’m no engineer and for sure, I wouldn’t have noticed that 3 does not come after 1 and never in a million years would I have noticed that 11 didn’t come after 1. You truly are an advanced mathematician!
@richystar20017 ай бұрын
The sound of this engine will be amazing.
@mikenewbry9 ай бұрын
@2:27 Nice
@MartianGopnik9 ай бұрын
@13:31 Cool to see where "5252" comes from, and that it's more specifically 33,000/2π.
@EngineeringExplained9 ай бұрын
The full story is actually really interesting, if, you know... you're interested! kzbin.info/www/bejne/nXSVXn2BhJWWaKssi=5oC5Sfz8dpUupw_a
@Nicolas_Germay9 ай бұрын
2:27 "69% larger, nice" - quote of the year.
@chandraprakashvihtavuori25629 ай бұрын
It would be nice to compare diameter of bearings for this V16 with a high-revving V12. One of the reasons why V16s are unpopular is that longer crankshaft is less stiff and as a result has a natural resonance at lower frequency. If the engine were revved to the rpm at which resonance occurs, crankshaft will break. Thus, the more cylinders there are in a V, the lower the limit on rpm is. 9,000 is very high for a V16, which makes me think that they either found a way to make crankshaft stiffer (by making it thicker or playing with the quality of metal), or they have implemented some very effective vibration dampening mechanism or both.
@Funpopular_Opinion9 ай бұрын
Finally a Bugatti that will potentially sound good
@origaminefretami34809 ай бұрын
EB110 wasnt bad
@Rawmon949 ай бұрын
that crank must be heavy af
@itsdokko29909 ай бұрын
imagine the crank wobble, such a long boi must wobble like crazy. i'm sure they thought of that
@ivanstefanac11449 ай бұрын
1 meter long😅
@JoshuaTootell9 ай бұрын
Crankshafts on my last ship were like 30' long. They can figure it out 😂
@dsdy12059 ай бұрын
@JoshuaTootell sure but it was probably also as wide as ur mom, that makes it less wobbly
@juliangramajo70109 ай бұрын
the cizeta moroder was a v16 in 91
@Vidarx29 ай бұрын
Was it a prodcution car though?
@MainInternetUser9 ай бұрын
I mean 8 production vehicles is it really a production car ? Those early 20th century v16s has hundreds of examples
@CyanRooper9 ай бұрын
Rare cars are considered production vehicles even when they are made in single digit numbers.
@Miwna9 ай бұрын
Cadillac made a V16 in 1930. They made 4000 of them.
@Emira_759 ай бұрын
Nah not really @@CyanRooper they're not series production vehicles. More homologated concept cars
@DamienWallace-r7v6 ай бұрын
All that explanation and failed to actually say that the engine was developed by Cosworth
@swecreations9 ай бұрын
Damn, it has the torque curve of an electric car!
@RampageGarage9 ай бұрын
I think we all appreciated that 😂 2:28
@stuartsmith53089 ай бұрын
CIZETA MORODER V16T 1995
@theotherguy69519 ай бұрын
I would assume whatever future car Bugatti will put the V16 in won’t be specifically designed for top speed because the hybrid system wouldn’t work when trying to reach the highest possible speed since there would be no regenerative braking and the engine would be better suited to just send all of its power straight to the wheels.
@sebastientumahai95609 ай бұрын
This is great. Because the one thing that Bugattis have always lacked is the sound to suit the power. This is gonna sound crazy on the next generation flagship
@currythegoatofmankindthepa51569 ай бұрын
Bugatti is the internal combustion engine champion i hope they keep this going and do a W20, and W30 and beyond like those rich guy cars from the 20s and 30s 😂
@ABEULER19814 ай бұрын
GREAT VIDEO! NICE NUMBERS!
@Adrian-39 ай бұрын
Im Glad Mr Rimac isn't going full electric but instead following Bugattis tradition by making huge powerful combustion engines and then combining them with the advantages of electric engines to make the ultimate car :D
@budatx099 ай бұрын
2:27 Ah a man of culture I see. Very nice.
@NarekAvetisyan7 ай бұрын
Wow, finally a new engine! Looks stunning! That Mate Rimac guy is the best!
@philliptownsend28297 ай бұрын
“The turbos are 69% larger… nice” 😂😂
@adamgibbs5059 ай бұрын
Electric power when leaving home and not upsetting the neighbours and coming home and V16 when you want to get from A to B at absolute blistering pace cannot wait for this to be unveiled
@jtonline999 ай бұрын
EU: we need to move towards clean engine tech Bugatti: hold my beer 🍺
@williamcolon36479 ай бұрын
Not a waste of time at all Jason ! Actually super entertaining and very informative!! Loved it!!👍👌
@Amin-dd9mk8 ай бұрын
In an era of electrification, bugatti decided to unleash a massive V16.
@billymania114 ай бұрын
It's madness. Glad I'm not a shareholder.
@strider_hiryu8509 ай бұрын
the enthusiast are gonna absolutely LOVE this thing. all the benefits of that raw, n/a predictability. with the linear power of a 16 cylinder engine only Bugatti can provide. mixed with the instant torque of the Rimac hybrid powertrain. and a sound so magnificent the Gods themselves will weep. it's gonna be marvelous. i wonder what the fuel economy will be like....
@AMtech_Spenny9 ай бұрын
I work at a dealer that sells and services Bugatti’s , and I can tell you none of us expected this We thought we’d see a 12 cylinder, or even a 8, paired with motors but here we are!
@bertramspielt9 ай бұрын
You can give so much more knowledge using a whiteboard and a few pictures - than (maybe) all of the animated videos here on YT! Love your channel, but this video is absolut outstanding. Thank you so much! Greetings from Austria 🇦🇹!
@kengrand54459 ай бұрын
I love when car manufacturers do things outside the norm...big props to bugatti
@Drunken_Hamster9 ай бұрын
Imagine making two sets of 180-degree headers for this engine, then merging the 4 collectors into one huge collector for maximum sound blending and high RPM scream-age. Also, 8.3L isn't enough. They should give it an 80mm stroke and 103mm bore for 10.7L of displacement and roughly 1400hp/900 lb-ft N/A.
@jaredkennedy65769 ай бұрын
That's pretty sweet. I have wanted to build a paired V8 V16 out of Ford 460s for a while now, just something about a 15L V16 that's appealing. It's interesting that they are doing this this way, my first choice plan was to run the front one in standard rotation but the rear one in reverse rotation, butted together, with the power going aft via a shaft slung underneath from the flywheel end. Hopefully they aren't going to have too much of an issue with crankshaft flex in that, or with block shifting.
@datviking9 ай бұрын
Engineering explained really knows how to make a 16 minute video feel like a 30 minute video because of the amount of information given.
@kylestewart83549 ай бұрын
Imagine how much simpler it is to package and cool a NA v16//electric combo. Vs. Quad turbo v16. Not to mention how beautiful that new motor will be NA.
@romeodogg9 ай бұрын
I dont understand why this makes sense to me, the way he explains things just makes sense it's great 🙌🏽 as long as you have a basic understanding of engines, this video is perfect
@Bmontepeque119 ай бұрын
My god Jason how are you so smart? Your pattern recognition, car knowledge and math work are UNBELIEVABLY GOOD. Also, I live how now Hybrids mean that we can go back to N/A engines because we don't need Turbos to assist engines anymore and therefore we regain great sounding engines 🥰🔥
@josephkibuika99579 ай бұрын
This guy , is just music to my ears ❤
@georgew40688 ай бұрын
I’m glad you know about ‘32. Some videos have called v16 cars a new thing