C-27J Next Generation II Pilot Aircraft Tour

New C-27J Spartan Next Generation, New equipment, avionics system and advanced aerodynamic devices: www.leonardocompany.com/en/pr...

[@tavolo2969]

The fact it is STOL is amazing

[@youtube.youtube.01]

It doesn't have STOL. STOL Requires taking off in less than 1,500 feet and clearing a 50 foot object at the end upon take-off. At 3:10 they published a take-off run of 1,903 ft.

[@sundownerstudios4614]

Having flown on the C-27J Spartan aircraft, I was very impressed with the flight characteristics and unimproved runway capabilities. It is such a beautiful and capable aircraft. Well done, Leonardo!

[@johnaustin6673]

Well done Lockheed Martin

[@mariorossi8401]

@@johnaustin6673 Vi piacerebbe! purtoppo per voi Leonardo è un azienza italiana e tale rimarrà .Tenetevi le vostre porcherie che imponete al resto del mondo spacciandole per" the best " che non sono neanche personalizzabili in base alle esigenze delle singole forze armate ,quando siete nei casini come ad esempio con i mezzi anfibi dei Marines dell' ante guerra( mi riferisco a quella del vietnam) in cui muoiono soldati, annegati durante delle esercitazioni o nel caso delle fregate che si basano su disegni degli anni sessanta ed erano gia obsolete quando sono entrate in servizio poi vi rivolgete all' Italia in fretta e furia affinché costruisca il meglio che c' è sul mercato mondiale e proprio brutta l' invidia e anche l' ignoranza!!!!

[@johnaustin6673]

It would not be what it is today without Lockheed Martin. It was good (had potential) Lockheed Martin made it great. Your Welcome

[@fatforastico5307]

​​@@johnaustin6673 the only thing Lockheed did in Italy and across Europe was to bribe the governments to make them buy the f104 shit

[@RJM1011]

A beautiful transport aircraft thumbs up and shared.

[@ahmedmajid1293]

فخر الصناعات الايطالية

[@davereid-daly2205]

A perfect multifunctional aircraft....

[@albertkvanderpool5847]

Alaska needs this plane.wow cool❤

[@razorsharpview9090]

Leonardo should built a gunship based on this plane.

[@giuseppetartarini8492]

Spettacolare grazie comandante. Peccato solo in inglese.

[@hassandoukkali3611]

airplanes music test the dream to be great actor of cinema or artist

[@ralphwatt8752]

Awaresome Airplane

[@dirkbogarde7796]

what about general aviation? private executive ?

[@randomwalk5095]

someone said SPARTAN? AHOO AHOO!

[@jamestamu83]

It's TINY compared to the C-130! Who needs that?

[@arminius8631]

Let's hope it has improved manufacturing quality.

[@YuRyLaS]

Pecunia non olet? Thank's from Belarus!

[@Happy-wb8gi]

Italian engineering , 👏

[@alopexvanvulpes2011]

I would like to see this Aircraft do a high level, 45°, fast dive approdge and take-off, with max. Fule and max. Payload on ... (Hillary),Lucklar Int. Airport, Nepal ... greetings from "Alopex", Cologne, Germany - Date.: Nov.07.2022 - (Local)time. : 11:38 a.m.

[@abduljabar8445]

Btw what is "Fule" and "lucklar" mean?

[@lokesh303101]

Far Better.

[@gregs7562]

Something for the UK/RAF to consider when they retire all their C130 & BAE 146 In a few years.

[@nocalsteve]

This aircraft isn’t in the same class as a C-130 or BAE 146.

[@gregs7562]

@@nocalsteve no but its more than the 146 QT which they have/had 2 off.

[@jamesbartlett5640]

I agree it's perfect for RAF its the go between A400M and like there BAe 146QT they had, also perfect for the SAS/SBS which is why we still have the Hercules at moment I believe.

[@tommypaget2294]

RAF C-130J would probably serve for the next few years more, like 45 years more.

[@tommypaget2294]

This aircraft was bought brand new by the US for Afghan Airforce, used for 3 years and then destroyed by backhoe by US contractors.

[@rajatdani619]

Airbus C295 vs Spartan C27j

[@user-vd8xs6zd5w]

정말 훌륭한 비행기 그러나 가난한 나라들이 구입하기엔 비싼 비행기 더 많은 나라들이 구입할수 있게 해주세요

[@alessandrobarbier5098]

In my opinion it continue to be too short, maybe only two meters longer was enough.

[@mysteryY2K]

buy an ATR or C-295 then

[@giri2016]

This aircraft should have participated inthe indian tender for 56 aircrafts.

[@ashutoshgupta6807]

Leonardo is blacklisted in India

[@giri2016]

I am aware of that, but how many years will the three helos supplied AW101 Imran will lie unused in hindon air station,it's really free supplied, since indian govt got back all the money.

[@jameson1239]

@@ashutoshgupta6807 why

[@CharlieET786]

@@jameson1239i think bcz leonardo do business with Pakistan

[@ctwentysevenj6531]

The c-27j is far superior when compared to the c-295

[@williamhutchinson7]

You can tell hes reading a promotional script lol, nice plane tho

[@sdfft820]

Wasn’t this the Italian G222?

[@matty82003]

It's an evolution of the old G222

[@camomiletea6708]

Ask the Australian Defence Force and Royal Australian Air Force for the aircraft’s operational history……….

[@michaelmulligan0]

Will the US let it be sold though?

[@michaelmulligan0]

@Truth is a bannable offence apologies got it the wrong way around. In 2012, the USAF announced it was retiring 21 x C27Js and Alenia stated that if the USAF sold them to another country they would not support them. They were subsequently transferred to US SOCOM and USCG

[@RobertLewis-el9ub]

@@michaelmulligan0 Australia bought them from the US. Currently not certified for battlefield operations.

[@guidobenedetto3253]

Video imbarazzante per Leonardo, non si vedevano questi montaggi video dai tempi del g222... come uccidere in 8 min dei gran contenuti.

[@thatguy7085]

C130 copy

[@matty82003]

Speaking without knowledge, uh? Never heard about the G222? Go reading about it and speak then ;)

[@Valentino6977]

It is very expensive and the fuel consumption is higher also than the competition, the cabin outward vision is poor. The type of window or windshield design is outdated today for a modern aircraft.

[@marcspector4997]

The high fuel consumption is evident for an aircraft with unmatched load capacity and performance at that size. The windows are the same as those of any other military transport aircraft. The only difference is having additional ones allowing a wider view.

[@aderitodealmeida5644]

Expensive? What is the average unit cost?

[@ctwentysevenj6531]

It has the best performance than any other twin turbo prop military transport plane. It is far more superior when compared to the c-295.

[@walterF205]

Choosing the c-295 simply means having lesser needs, so we might as well buy aircraft with smaller capacities.

[@ctwentysevenj6531]

@@walterF205 however using a transport plane to supply an army outpost, you need a transport plane that can land in short runways and take a variety of loads. Like light military vehicles, generators, weapons systems, general supplies etc. Having a plane that can only take a limit amount of different cargo can leave these military outpost not getting what they need.