Dear Camille, we're still waiting for your debate with a) Naomi Wolf b) Gloria Steinem c) Slavoj Zizek
Пікірлер: 223
@paganwardrumbloodritual5 ай бұрын
“You don’t know how bad it is” In 1995, the idea that basically all of academia’s position would be anti-western culture was unbelievable, but here we are. She called it.
@ninjagold92445 ай бұрын
No, if you went to college during the 60s, you certainly knew what was going on. Students for a Democratic Society recruited many of their little terror activists from campuses. What ideologies and academic theories do you think they operated on? By the 90s they had full control.
@duke012615 ай бұрын
Except all of academia is fully behind the State Dep. when it comes to imposing western "values" and destroying other cultures (China, Russia, Iran etc etc).
@HuellsJewels4 ай бұрын
Point taken. But this was the 90s. Rose was definitely representative of how outsiders saw academia. The Soviet Union had just folded, Bill Clinton led the Democratic Party, union membership was collapsing, Andrew Sullivan edited The New Republic, Jane Fonda was rebranding herself as a born-again Christian. There was a sense that the 60s radicals had been purged from public life. I can't entirely blame people for not seeing the problem.
@AndosaGosabuIksrog4 ай бұрын
Hardly the case. Anti imperialist/colonialist to an extent and to the extent this overlaps with anti-western, I suppose it may cause confusion.
@AndosaGosabuIksrog4 ай бұрын
And even this is limited to some niches of the humanities and perhaps social sciences. This represents a tiny fraction of the academia but perhaps a majority of people see on youtube and understand as academics.
@tristanmellor67993 жыл бұрын
“Are you happy ?” “No not until I reform academia, which will take another 20 years” 20 years later, we’ve slipped further into degradation
@michaelmoorhead7623 жыл бұрын
It's over... the manipulation of language was the backdoor that relativism slipped through and now it's mainstream... the only way I fight it is to search for truth.. Peterson, Rogan weinstein, and Douglas Murray are basically the only ones guarding the gates of truth, along with some, not all, of the Christian fundamentalists, Camille is refreshing and definitely entertaining 😀
@pobj67232 жыл бұрын
@@michaelmoorhead762 Rogan and Douglas Murray do not belong in the same LEAGUE as Camille and Jordan
@zarbins5 ай бұрын
@@pobj6723 Rogan is certainly not an intellectual but he's highly successful in three domains and has had a huge cultural impact. Given his reach into blue collar everyman society and his ability to hold three hours conversations with a wide array of guests it's worth noting his significance.
@PrenticeBoy1688Ай бұрын
@@zarbinsI'm paraphrasing, but Peterson said that Rogan's programme is basically honest conversation. We need more of same.
@zarbinsАй бұрын
@@PrenticeBoy1688 I agree
@valentinagonzalez13765 жыл бұрын
She is the love of my life
@jabrown5 жыл бұрын
Tell her?
@jccusell4 күн бұрын
Her whole being is just stunning. Stunning, unique woman.
@john5150.4 жыл бұрын
It's 2019 and I only just discovered Camille. I am so grateful. She is so bold, so smart, and so confident. I love her arguments on personal responsibility, free thought, and free speech. I'm on board with her with everything. Her message is more important than ever today.
@solomonariel28342 жыл бұрын
I guess im asking randomly but does anyone know a way to get back into an instagram account..? I was stupid forgot the password. I would love any tricks you can give me!
@justinsmith41573 күн бұрын
solomonariel2834 Also kinda random, how many boosters did you get?
@khoroatos4 ай бұрын
her fiery and vivid expression, twitchy mannerisms, merciless paradigmatic intellect, self-assured and assertive personality. god i am just infatuated
@Gfffgvcddfggvhjjhgfc2 ай бұрын
It’s good to know I’m not the only one who has a crush on her!
@carycimino76993 ай бұрын
I have loved her for years even though I’m a straight man and she is a gay women I would go out with her and try to make it work
@Besseloff5 ай бұрын
What a force of nature!
@chopin654 жыл бұрын
Another "20 years". That's so adorable. Not only has her laudable reform failed but it has been murdered by postmodern assassins and buried next to the ashes of the Western Canon. I love you, Camila. You are my Wild Child Goddess. Long may you live and teach diversity of thought. Long may you rant and fire off truth like an assault rifle of learning. Long may you up hold and champion free expression of ideas. Long may you inspire young minds. Long may you frustrate, offend, confound, and destroy the thought police of academia, that seek to put braces on the brains of American college students. Long may you wake the "woke". Thanks. You are the best.
@jonathankieranwriter3 жыл бұрын
Laudable effort, indeed, but not all such efforts come to fruition. I agree with you wholeheartedly. I think the more telling extraction from Paglia’s multi-decade observation has been her conviction that we are most certainly in Late/Last Phases. Even she could not have foreseen the staggering impact that the cyber explosion would occasion, in ever-accelerated ways, not long after this interview was held. It has been the obscene game-changer. She knows we’re doomed, and doomed HARD. Which is why we aren’t hearing much from her now, her old age notwithstanding. She knows. Brace Thyself.
@marcv26488 ай бұрын
I agree. Her ideas have failed because she did not have the conceptual fundaments of the sexual marketplace, and sexual market value. Her castle was built on sand.
@firouz42962 жыл бұрын
Her feminism is uplifting! She empowers women to be their best without being a victim. She has been my hero since 1990. I am super happy to have had Paglia shape my understanding of feminism.
@fernandonaumann6 жыл бұрын
My favorite intellectual as well! I scour KZbin for her videos and I'm glad this one's been recently posted. Thanks! :)
@miedqy06 жыл бұрын
You're welcome, Man! Unfortunately she was wrong about death of that date rape thing. We're experiencing a return of it right now.
@fernandonaumann6 жыл бұрын
Yes, and it's even more unfortunate that the date rape hysteria is in full swing. I guess she didn't anticipate the revenge of the PC culture in academe and in the media. However, I am sure the most sensible argument will win the cultural war because there are many important people aside from her raising important issues and inconsistencies with their ideology. I guess Jordan Peterson is one of the most prominent figures at this time. I hope the pendulum will swing back into sanity! And thanks again for the video.
@miedqy05 жыл бұрын
i actually like Peterson, for his coolheadedness, but he's hopelessly conservative. he says: well, casual sex is counterproductive, because it doesn't provide intimacy and warmth and you treat people merely instrumentally, and i am with the same woman i met when i was a child etc. Oh Jordan, come on, young people aren't designed for abstinency and, well at least he acknowledges this, casual sex provides adrenaline rush stable relationships may lack :) there is a time for everything, i applaud promiscuity in 20s and 30s.
@tomasandrew93543 жыл бұрын
@@miedqy0 agreed. I watched Paglia and Peterson’s video of their conversation, which was my first time hearing him talk. My impression was that Peterson pales in comparison to Paglia intellectually speaking. I found his ideas vacuous, which surprised me considering he’s a psychologist. Paglia has way more insight into human behaviour than he does and is light years more well-rounded than he is in different fields of knowledge.
@Rubyuis3 ай бұрын
this interview is the greatest thing i've ever seen
@bresophil4 жыл бұрын
Such a treasure. I'm so glad I discovered her. Changed so much of how I see the world. May she live forever
@magallanesagustin4952 Жыл бұрын
You are aware that she's in favor of pedophilia, right?
@wearethenightparty5 жыл бұрын
Although Camille Paglia identifies herself as a feminist (albeit a dissident one) certain SJW editors on Wikipedia are actively and relentlessly reverting any reference to her as a feminist in her introductory description. This is because the radical left do not want her recognised as a feminist. This misrepresentation of Camille results in her Google description reading only as "academic and social critic". If any of you are wikipedia editors - fight the good fight and help keep an eye on these ideological wiki-warriors who are persistently re-shaping reality to adhere to their 'campus lenses'.
@johnnybravo38395 жыл бұрын
And....don't forget she is incredibly intellectually consistent!
@bradbarnes18395 жыл бұрын
@Juliana Silva lol paglia is very evidently not stupid, she's in fact a very stable genius
@Paglia4442 жыл бұрын
wikipedia is propaganda
@populisttrope9385 Жыл бұрын
No one should take Wikipedia seriously. It is pure state propaganda.
@SquareNoggin5 ай бұрын
They're doing her a favor. Feminism is not good or truthful, in any form. A large part of the problem is that many people who in good faith attempt to oppose the revolutionaries continue to accept and internalize false axioms of the revolutionary worldview. Feminism at it's core submits that men and women aren't fundamentally different (beyond arbitrary physiological accients of birth and the conditionining of the patriarchal culture) - and therefore any customs, norms, obligations and expectations imposed on either men and women respectively - because of their sex - are intrinsically unjust and "backwards". The implication being that the "enlightened" (IE revolutionary, or if you prefer "leftist") view is that men and women are the same and ought to do all the same stuff in the same ways. "Equality" But of course men and women are not the same, and the traditional view that we are in fact distinct (and when in cooperation, like in the institution of marriage, complimentary) - is much more truthful. It stands to reason that a culture and society that enables people to flourish will recognize this reality of the human condition and it's customs and norms will reflect that. That's not to suggest that any and all traditional "gendered" customs are good and ought to be defended at all costs - but that there will be "gendered" expectations, tabboos and norms should be taken for granted and we move forward from there. The feminist can't do that. Maybe they were correct to want to update or "modernize" certain gender norms after the industrial revolution and the upheavel that caused in society ans in families, but they necessarily throw the baby out with the bathwater because of their fundamental principles. It brings us to a point we're at now - where nearly all the traditions and customs related to sex and gender have been deconstructed and weakened, and we're so untethered from reality (and from the wisdom our inherited traditions could have granted us) that we'd hardly be able to discern which traditions ought to be maintained, which ought to be adjusted (slowly), and if any ought to be eliminated... We can't even know for sure anymore, because we've been tossing out our traditions without understanding why they were there in the first place. As it relates to sexuality, marriage, family and gender - the feminists are to blame for all the cultural dysfunction that I suspect is self evident to most of us today. All the feminists are guilty. Including the so-called "first wave". As crazy as it might sound to modern liberals, granting women the franchise actually wasn't worth the destruction of the family and all gender roles and norms. It wasn't worth for women or men. Many women who were contemporaries to the first wave feminists saw this inevitable outcome in their time, and (rightly) opposed the early feminists. Not out of weakness, not out of helplessness, not out of ignorance, not out of fear of responsibility, not out of shame over their womanhood - but out of love for their culture, their families and concern for their future. To read some of the women anti-sufragettes is quite eye opening; many made a very sound and eloquent case for why it's a good thing for it to be a husband's role to cast a vote, and (rightly) pointed out that if husbands and wives have conflicting political interests then that family has deeper and more pressing issues to sort out than the wife's damaged ego about having the "right" to go out and cast the vote herself. They saw families as the fundamental political unit, and as the head of the family, representing the family to the outside world, it's a husband's role to go out and cast the vote. Of course it's implied that this husband/father would be voting for what's best for his wife and children, and of course all the wisdom, insight, experience and love of his own wife will influence his decision - just as it influences him in all manner of profound ways. That's what a marriage is - two become one, made inseperable by the Creator Himself. As with the 1950s and 1960s civil rights people, modern people wildly underestimate just how radical those original "movers and shakers" really were, and just how much the chaos we see today is precisely in line with what they intended to bring about through their revolutionary praxis. The early feminists were absolutely trying to drive a wedge in the family, just as their ideological descendents continue to do. All this to say, I just can't take seriously people who cling to terms like "feminist". Either you're a queer theory radical who thinks sex distinctions are an oppressive social construct and we gotta "save trans kids" - or you're a "I'm a woman hear me roar!" who thinks solidarity between all women is somehow more meaningful than solidariry within an actual meaningful collective (like a family, a community, a nation, etc) which is always necessarily going to include men and women cooperating and with aligned interests. Any identity, movement, collective, etc. worth anything will be made up of both men and women. Ideally marrying each other and building families; because both men and women need one another to truly flourish and be virtuous.
@kmacksmcdonald64755 ай бұрын
Camille predicted WOKENESS far before we all became aware of it. 2024 we all see what she said that came to fruition. If only more could have been done about it!!
@moviereviews14462 ай бұрын
Whether or not you agree with what she says, one must admire how she says what she believes so fearlessly and with such conviction.
@RMHVids5 ай бұрын
she looks pretty fine here ngl
@deansusec87453 жыл бұрын
it is so sad that in 2021 all these issues are still around. Nobody listened
@AnthonyAvery4 жыл бұрын
Working-class intellectual! love it
@jonathankieranwriter3 жыл бұрын
Oh, the irony, considering the harassment subject matter. Charlie Rose 🤭😂 Camille rules. She was ABSOLUTELY prophetic about the damnation of the West in academe, which Charlie Rose, at that time, did not believe was even possible. He has been proven a fool in more ways than one.
@ArtworkAnon5 ай бұрын
I just discovered this girl and she really has a good grip. I like her energy.
@max-ru6cz3 жыл бұрын
Surprised how gracefully she takes his interrupting her right when she’s about to make a point
@daisyjohnson53685 жыл бұрын
Thank you for posting!
@tylerironside39155 жыл бұрын
Charlie Rose acting like a saint for woman.
@AB-bt9eb5 жыл бұрын
Love Camille...she's genius.
@marcv26488 ай бұрын
She's intelligent, but history has shown her to be wrong.
@michaelsnook16845 ай бұрын
@@marcv2648exactly the opposite lmao
@KR-nv3ru5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for posting this. Can't get enough of Paglia. 😍🙌
@jabrown5 жыл бұрын
Every time Camille Paglia says "okay", take a shot, okay? You'll be drunk in no time, okay?
@tbk20105 жыл бұрын
okay
@spacewitch66674 жыл бұрын
Ahah perfect! :)
@HoNoRey4 жыл бұрын
I hyfgjjjbvdd )$! .. okay ?
@krisphiles Жыл бұрын
I've noticed this, but I watched her 1985 interview, and she didn't do it at all!!! In 1995 she did it a little bit.. Not sure why that developed, but I never let it distract me from the quality of her thought processes.
@ccrisc1005 ай бұрын
Always distracting from the point. Who cares if she says OK a lot?
@roxanne48203 жыл бұрын
15:08 I don't think she knew how much more relevant this would be 30 years later
@ferilranbit5 ай бұрын
she was on FIRE here, especially.
@yggdrasil90394 күн бұрын
wow, 30 years ahead of her time
@phoenixdoom10 ай бұрын
That interview was on fire! These interviews should have millions of views, so entertaining
@MatthewGriffin15 ай бұрын
She was really cooking on this one
@aidepaul5342 жыл бұрын
The aries energy is real...
@josepha.chavez80604 жыл бұрын
Camille is simply magnificent.
@Ali-jm5jm5 ай бұрын
What a fun gal.
@ledhicks2 жыл бұрын
The tension was palpable, but Camille is unshakeable. Love her.
@marcv26488 ай бұрын
I like Camille too, but you have to acknowledge that her ideas have been proven wrong.
@ledhicks8 ай бұрын
@@marcv2648what ideas? Cite one.
@timearly52265 жыл бұрын
Playback speed 0.75x
@kevinmoseley10395 ай бұрын
She’s amazing
@markkavanagh7377 Жыл бұрын
Love Camille, even just watching her mouth trying to keep up with her mighty mind!!!!
@LOUI20545 ай бұрын
Based gay icon.
@xLeeroycranex5 ай бұрын
Spot on about it killing art. Even Roger Ebert was warning about political correctness potentially destroying art back in the 90s. Now, we see it in its ultimate form. I don't know how Hollywood recovers from it. It probably never does due to how deep the gatekeepers have seeped into the industry. Regardless, an entire generation has gone by without the next Scorsese/Spielberg/De Palma/Coppola or the next Coen Brothers/Tarantino/Fincher/PTA. I don't think people understand the limited resources/renting space/crew needed for a Hollywood production. That it has been wasted on various vanity projects? That's time and money that could've gone to the next great filmmaker.
@nminodob5 жыл бұрын
Although I agree with a lot of what she says, she's dead wrong that "date rape is a dead issue thanks to me!" It's more alive than ever!
@thedolphin54285 жыл бұрын
Yep, that's not to mean it's true, but that the bullshit is still going on.
@milestackettmusic Жыл бұрын
The spirit of freedom & independent thought incarnate. Thank you Camille Paglia
@divatalk90114 ай бұрын
She’s disappeared from public life now
@solofilmproduction5 ай бұрын
She is a strong independent character that can carry any intellectual argument, Bravo 👊
@spacewitch66674 жыл бұрын
I just dont know if I hate her immensely or love her immensely
@elvansavkli38065 жыл бұрын
She is so right about living in New York. New york is not a pace to be creative. Or learning. New York is a bubble. iT IS BUSINESS CENTER. What ever you do even arts are business.
@mercury71923 жыл бұрын
So what is?
@kasperm.r.guldberg73546 жыл бұрын
14:52: Interesting question - in hindsight...
@phoenixdoom10 ай бұрын
I just lovethe chemistry between these two :D . Camille having so much fun and interviiewer is certainly enjoying the conversation
@sbwification25 жыл бұрын
I love her, but she skated past the child pornography question.
@miedqy05 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/fXvchmpqjJikjdU
@miedqy05 жыл бұрын
14:45
@jec2225 жыл бұрын
@La Serpenta Canta the accusation is too shocking to be brushed aside.
@windowtrimmer82112 ай бұрын
Great, great, great.
@PhilipDaniel4 жыл бұрын
16:24 AMEN!
@thelred972911 ай бұрын
16:18 hauntingly prescient
@daverice24263 күн бұрын
Brilliant but also exhausting. I recommend 0.75 playback speed
@GrahamMilkdrop5 жыл бұрын
To the people who are clambering to claim the moral high-ground and condemn the interviewer... you either have not listened to what Camille said or have not understood her perspective. I understand that the prevailing cultural narrative has been so effectively screwed into place that it isn't easy to detach, but if you are interested in ideas enough to be drawn to this video then you really ought to try to develop some capacity for critical thinking and independent thought.
@tonyatmidnight4 жыл бұрын
I really don't understand your viewpoint, Graham ... you need to clarify exactly what you are trying to say. Are you against what people are now saying about Rose or his performance as an interviewer then?
@nicolehandy6905 жыл бұрын
Interesting that comedians are being sensored and attacked these days. Because they highlight the truth and teach us to laugh at ourselves.
@chernobylcoleslaw66984 жыл бұрын
She claims to have never fallen in love with a man - challenge accepted.
@MattBaker7893 жыл бұрын
From 12:48 to 13:35 - a “Joan Rivers” vibe if there ever was one!
@duncefunce151311 ай бұрын
She's bang on about the death penalty, in my opinion, but boy does she breeze past the question of child pornography
@rahulbhatia13132 жыл бұрын
This woman always sees the future.
@JohnCPaul742 жыл бұрын
Charlie always had to talk more than his guests. His questions always had to be longer, wordier and more nuanced than he allowed his guests' answers to be. He was always competing with his guests. Now he's talking to himself, at last.
@elvansavkli38065 жыл бұрын
I love her energy . I wish there are women like her in my country i Turkey but noway.If one speaks like her ,all the other women in Turkey would not wanna do anything with her.
@benbax59903 жыл бұрын
Camile is fantastic.... clear talk....
@marcv26488 ай бұрын
Paglia was cutting edge at this time. As a young man, I thought she had a better understanding of human sexuality than anyone in society. However, the last 20 years have proven that she was mistaken about a great many things. She essentially missed a more general understanding human sexuality at that time. Red Pill thinking has rediscovered that lost knowledge, and given a much more complete picture of human sexuality. This gives us a better understanding of why institutions like sexual monogamy within marriage were so rigorously enforced. Now at the rump end of the sexual revolution, we have relearned the lessons of millennia ago through bitter experience.
@TwistedThunderKittie3 жыл бұрын
Can someeone please help me figure out when this was recorded and premiered? Here she is mentioning the harms of the industrial revolution in 1995 , the same year Ted Kacynski's manifesto is published in major newspapers (September 19th).
@TwistedThunderKittie3 жыл бұрын
And I was not born yet..... but I'm dying to know her thoughts at this time
@gum81912 жыл бұрын
She’s right.
@YouTubeShortsSuck734 Жыл бұрын
I am patiently waiting for Paglia in Love. I suspect it was written but nobody out of least 7 companies has had the moxie to publish it.
@tristanmellor67993 жыл бұрын
The “ok”s are beginning
@makegeorgeorwellfictionaga92683 жыл бұрын
This guy is white knighting a lot. I agree with a lot of what she says
@aidanmurray73193 ай бұрын
I can’t reconcile the CIA and it’s involvement in Rock n Roll via Laurel Canyon. Not even gonna mention MK Ultra and mass-distributed LSD.
@LukeMungo4 жыл бұрын
14:37 legendary status
@willblakeguy4 жыл бұрын
Hilarious that Charlie Rose doesn't know what to do with her. He looks like she makes him exhausted. Has he ever talked as little as this in any interview?
@roxanne48205 жыл бұрын
wow her appearance has changed so much
@sxnico5 жыл бұрын
she's 47 here. this was 24 years ago.
@Rochelle9372 жыл бұрын
It's called aging.
@edwardmaxwell39515 жыл бұрын
LOL Charlie's questions are quite... pointed!
@krisphiles Жыл бұрын
Awesome
@augustgreig94205 жыл бұрын
Fuck. I'm in love.
@Rochelle9372 жыл бұрын
What a horrible interviewer. He continually interrupted her, put words in her mouth, and seemed visibly angry that she wouldn't follow along with him like a docile puppy. He argued with her rather than listen to her. If an interviewer isn't genuinely interested in hearing what a guest says, then he shouldn't have her on.
@ladanmahgoub47694 жыл бұрын
You can literally feel his exhaustion with her at 26:40 lol
@Ken_Brooks3 жыл бұрын
12:34 Charlie is all in on this line of thought.
@jonnydoe855 жыл бұрын
I think it would be difficult to be a Libertarian who wants all government out of our lives and still be a Bernie Sanders supporter.
@miedqy05 жыл бұрын
She explains that in one interview, i'll show you :)
@miedqy05 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/oXqzlYWdqJ6jo68
@miedqy05 жыл бұрын
around 1 hour and 9 minutes she explains that.
@jonnydoe855 жыл бұрын
@@miedqy0 Thank you for that. I watched her reply and still cannot understand how she could support Sanders while calling herself a Libertarian. Believing the government should provide a safety net for the poor and take care of roads is one thing. What Sanders wants is a government that takes care of most everything. She says she supports a shrinking government. With Sanders you would get the opposite. Libertarians want low/no taxes. Try flying that idea past Bernie and see what it gets ya. Trust me, she's no Libertarian.
@yendid75875 жыл бұрын
j'adore
@s.l.george7348 Жыл бұрын
There is no one like her......
@hilmarthorbjarnason9353 жыл бұрын
She talks really fast.
@assad52604 жыл бұрын
usually can't find anything to disagree with her on, but her ideologies are leaking a little here. genuinely upset
@bovnycccoperalover35795 жыл бұрын
Rose is a faux intellectual but Paglia is the real deal. The things she was in academia 24 years ago has pervaded the rest of society. It has become a nightmare.
@el_chico13133 күн бұрын
16:00 oh my good a woman speaking sense "leaaaaarning"
@firouz256 Жыл бұрын
"Evita Person of the White House"! I am gaaaaging
@Gorboduc3 жыл бұрын
The laugh after 28:10 lol
@2packrm7817 ай бұрын
15:37 I don't believe it..... she saw this coming over 20yrs ago🤯... & she was right on the Werstern Culture is evil & the outside is good. Damn.
@RichardKoenigsberg4 жыл бұрын
Gee, Charlie Rose ain't as great as we thought he was. Seems like he's harassing the lady.
@RocketKirchner5 жыл бұрын
Paglia defends Western civ !!!
@marcv26488 ай бұрын
I view her defense as somewhat reactionary, but laudable. We had no way of knowing how relentless the attacks on Western Civilization would become. So most didn't take it as a serious threat at the time.
@giovannibarranca25955 жыл бұрын
10:56 Hilarious!
@furiousmat4 жыл бұрын
boy how wrong she was about the date rape thing being dead.
@DHU11 Жыл бұрын
30:24 was so cute lol
@cezariebeaudry3620 Жыл бұрын
I have a hard time taking anything she says seriously as soon as she brings up being Italian or an Aries as being an excuse for her behavior
@freakrainbo Жыл бұрын
Maybe that’s something you need to work on.
@vestaarcadia5 ай бұрын
Clearly you need to spend more time around Italians
@VortexGaming11214 жыл бұрын
10:50 She argues if a women says yes to going to a man's apartment on the first date she is consenting to sex. No it doesn't, if they then start doing stuff then that can be seen as consent. I don't know how I feel about her viewpoint
@skinnysnorlax18764 жыл бұрын
Not quite. She explains her points more thoroughly in longer form discussion. She argues that communication, including sexual communication, is far more sophisticated than simply "yes" or "no". That women are capable of signaling various romantic or sexual messages through body language, interest, dress, etc. She argues that women should be knowledgeable about this, and communicate responsibly. Basically, if you go to a date's apartment afterwards, there is a message communicated. If you visit their apartment just to hang out in the day, that isn't necessarily the same message. She basically wants women to understand and embrace their power sexually, and to use it responsibly.
@VortexGaming11214 жыл бұрын
@@skinnysnorlax1876 Yeah that was a rash comment made haha. 100% agree with you
@Jo-jl5ys3 жыл бұрын
12:53 Anita Hill is the biggest phony OH PLEASE
@monte68x2 ай бұрын
Tim Allen - a rich Hollywood celebrity - is a proletarian guy? Huh?
@BoyGeorgestrait3 күн бұрын
If I remember right. He got rich after prison. Maybe that's what she's talking about
@boycemark64704 жыл бұрын
Apologies, it gets worse... Ms Paglia does herself no favours...