So Spielberg was just trying to grant the wish of a friend? Trying to realize a dream that Kubrick was obsessed with for years? Was… Steve Spielberg Kubrick's Blue Fairy?
@daelen.cclark6 жыл бұрын
FerHivore, Spielberg is a really great guy isn’t he?
@b3rz3rk3r96 жыл бұрын
*sniff* Brings a tear to my eyes.
@ellnats5 жыл бұрын
nahhh, he was just a good friend
@operleutnant72355 жыл бұрын
Maybe. That is actually a pretty beautiful way you put it.
@noahblair30205 жыл бұрын
🧚🏼♀️
@wcsstudios19 жыл бұрын
The brilliance of the ending is that it is not the optimistic, fairy tale Spielberg ending that it looks like. There's a lot more going on there. Think of it as an inversion of the first act of the film, this time with Monica being the false surrogate for the real thing and David being the closest thing there is to a human in that final scene.
@falloutghoul19 жыл бұрын
+MikeDiastavrone3 Mind = *Blown*
@Pl4sm4Ro4ch9 жыл бұрын
+MikeDiastavrone3 damn ... thats soo deep i think im at that blue fairy place under the ferris wheel
@abeltonia9 жыл бұрын
...You are right. Oh my god...
@derumasforlos42858 жыл бұрын
+MikeDiastavrone3 Holy shit. You're right.
@merriquelynn7 жыл бұрын
That's what has made me cry since I saw this movie in theater with my dad. It just breaks my heart. He finally gets his perfect day with her, and it does fit so well with the beginning. You just have to feel it, look at it and not just analyze it.
@IzzysTravelDiaries4 жыл бұрын
I always figured the robots at the end were what the robots evolved into. Humans died out due to their stupidity and the robots took over the world. They forgot their origins, and David was their window to a world passed.
@michaelroseagain Жыл бұрын
absolutely. OR, David is dreaming, under the ocean, staring at blue fairy and imagining the whole thing.
@killer921739 ай бұрын
@michaelroseagain yeah, but that whole, "it was all a dream!" Ending was done to death, and can ruin the whole movie if it was done poorly.
@Kona_chibi6 жыл бұрын
I think the ending to A.I has something of a bitter irony to it. Personally I think the reason Kubrick wanted Spielberg to direct the film was because he believed Spielberg would be able to make that ending work. Kubrick's movies rarely have happy endings, where as Spielberg is a master at it, but since Spielberg respected Kubrick too much to consider taking over his work, Kubrick had to try and write the ending himself, and did so by trying to mimic Spielberg's work. What we ended up with in the final release was Spielberg mimicking Kubrick mimicking Spielberg. If the two had just agreed to direct the movie together while Kubrick was still alive, it could have been a masterpiece the likes of which would never be made again, but instead we got one director doing his best to keep the dream of the other alive, which, while it wasn't a phenomenal success as a movie, was still a very respectable thing to do. I have little faith in Spielberg's newest movies, but I can't deny that his heart is in the right place.
@DragonKirby5 жыл бұрын
Wow,it makes sense
@cubbleshasreturned69685 жыл бұрын
I think a movie about the making of this movie and the friendship and admiration between speilberg and Kubrick would have been better than this
@julianfaranda3 жыл бұрын
I'll admit I thought it was pretty crazy that Kubrick wrote that ending, but the more I thought about it, it makes alot of sense since that style of story telling was not Kubrick's specialty, like you said trying to emulate a style that he was not known for by the way as for little faith in newer Spielburg movies, personally I still loved ready player one
@RTU1302 жыл бұрын
O
@Z-Mikes002 жыл бұрын
West side story would like a word with you
@voxorox6 жыл бұрын
before we can program love, first we have to figure out... What is love baby don't hurt me don't hurt me no more
@Geoffreyvexer6 жыл бұрын
Indomitus1973 Love is a Pepsi advertisement.
@johnjohnson78886 жыл бұрын
@MiNe TheLegoManiac happy now you grammar nazi?
@K4RN4GE9116 жыл бұрын
Love is Taking a dive Then getting real comfortable And peeing in the pool And love is Real life porn Except the things That make porn cool
@becdoesyoutube6 жыл бұрын
100TH LIKE :D
@k-leb46714 жыл бұрын
What is Lo-o-o-o-o-o-o-ove anyway? Does anybody love anybody anyway?
@mrtoadal28664 жыл бұрын
When I watched this as a 14 year old, I loved teddy and his devotion to David. I almost cried when he revealed he had kept the hair for all those years, just because they might be important to David at some point, and David goes "thanks" and walks off to spend the day with someone else.
@michaelroseagain Жыл бұрын
just like his mother
@foggyfrogy Жыл бұрын
David is running after the ideal human, a kind and empathetic soul that is loved by their mother. The joke here is that no human in this movie is the ideal human and the ones that actually (to an extent) care for David are the robots. It's actually done in a way that you as a viewer symphatize more with the robots than humans to the extent that you really want them to become ''happy'' but this actually is what make artificial intelligence so dangerous, 'cause no matter how human-like they behave they're never gonna be humans. I think it's an amazing movie because when I was a child I sympathized with David, seeing him as just a child that wants to be loved. Now when I watch it again I can actually to some extent understand everyone's perspective and that actually no one here is either really in the right or wrong.
@thekenjistream86837 жыл бұрын
Before knowing the backstory of the ending, I found it already sad that all he wanted was to love his mother even after 2000 years (even tho it's programmed, etc...) But now we see that Spielberg and Kubrick were just the kid and the bear. One who has a dream and the other one who want to help making that dream come true
@kevingarrett84036 жыл бұрын
TheKenjiStream: Interesting insight. Me, I liked the ending. It was touching and heartfelt.
@bobthebear12466 жыл бұрын
TheKenjiStream Which is ironic - don't you think? - because in real life, Kubrick was physically more bear-like. 😊
@justinpop6 жыл бұрын
The bear was a reference to Jiminy Cricket or the conscience of David. Jiminy Cricket in itself was a reference to Jesus Christ or the conscience of humanity. The term Jiminy Cricket was a word used in the first half of the twentieth century like you would say heck instead of hell or dang instead of damn.
@SatsumaFortuna5 жыл бұрын
I'm only commenting to say that this realization did not just make me cry a little bit. 😢
@Hessed37125 жыл бұрын
TheKenjiStream Crap! This made me tear up.
@emilydawn69997 жыл бұрын
the bashing of TMZ will always make me love this review
@arthas6406 жыл бұрын
That channel is a cancer. Scratch that, I've had cancer, cancer isnt as wide spread and at least it just rots peoples body instead of their minds and souls
@GoatPopsicle6 жыл бұрын
God, I’ve broken up with women over their love of TMZ. I just can stand that whole premise
@stephenmcdonagh27956 жыл бұрын
Is TMZ even worse than Buzzfeed or Moms' Net? That's one low bar to beat- so low that an anorexic calypso ameba couldn't squeeze under it. I suppose the one benefit is; TMZ manages to group these vacuous tossers together, so if anyone had a dirty truth bomb, hey presto, the TMZ Borg Collective could be destroyed along with their combined below average IQ levels in one blow job.
@arthas6406 жыл бұрын
@@stephenmcdonagh2795 I do think that TMZ is pretty much bottom of the barrel
@AICabal6 жыл бұрын
TMZ or the MSM, one and the same now :)
@gghelis6 жыл бұрын
Soo... when they reanimated his mother for one day by taking DNA from her hair... why did they not use just one hair string? And then another hair string for another day? Or maybe cut each hair string into multiple pieces? How much DNA did they need? Why am I questioning this?
@madanotap64925 жыл бұрын
Also presumably the clone has hair, so you could just continue this cycle forever
@michaelbremer355 жыл бұрын
adam paton actually depending on the method, if you make clones of clones each one be increasingly defective until the dna is so damaged that it's useless, (inbreeding is also undesirable for the same basic principle) plus in the movie it's implied that the mom clone was grown in like a couple hours, with such a short growth period, of course she'd have only a day to live. If the growth period was slower, mayde a day, or even a week, she'd live for far longer.
@memories87075 жыл бұрын
I'm not going to bother explaining it but basically you die and Gary animated in the movie one show reanimated you die if you go unconscious why didn't they just find the way to keep her up
@galletasist5 жыл бұрын
It has something to do with the soul. Like, the body can be created again, but the souls of the person that came back "vanishes" forever after the first attempt. It is kinda bleak for the resurrected person tbh.
@catherinespark5 жыл бұрын
Because her very existence within the fabric of space and time simply fades away once her clone dies - the alien says so. So presumably she is not dead but falling towards death as we leave them at the end of the film, and she will vanish once she is dead, leaving David thus finally free from his unquenchable, programmed love.
@alexandraluster61858 жыл бұрын
When you know the backstory for the lame ending, it's so hard to get angry. Heck, if anything, it makes it 100% forgivable, since he did it as a last request for his friend. it's so sweet.
@lrush69837 жыл бұрын
+Zanu QueenOfWolves You okay?
@justkab41747 жыл бұрын
The Branded Alchemist she's just too grumpy
@lrush69837 жыл бұрын
+you've come to the wrong place rookie Okay
@NoOne007 жыл бұрын
If he could have one more day with his mom then it was enough for him...having context makes this heart wrenching
@MatteoPrezioso7 жыл бұрын
No, it's not, It is extremely stupid. But it does make it work for weak, emotionally fragile people. Ouch.
@bryanegelhoffsanimationtec2576 жыл бұрын
The parents reasoning for getting rid of David make no sense. 1. David could have told them what the son was doing. 2. They pushed the LOVE FOREVER button. 3. The bear could have told them what happened. 4. Take him to the scientists to figure out what is wrong. 5. If you are gonna leave him, put him outta his misery.
@QuintetMagician6 жыл бұрын
Seriously!!! If you'd just abandon your child in the woods for being difficult, maybe you were the wrong candidate to give a robot child with undying love to!
@anondecepticon6 жыл бұрын
The robot's creators were idiots, too. 1. Let's make a robot child who doesn't eat, sleep or age that will love only ONE parent forever. (Hope the other one dies first!) 2. Let's select the worst possible candidates to test the prototype - a couple with a child in a coma who are guaranteed to feel deeply conflicted about replacing him with a robot. (Why not pick a childless couple who desperately want one and will feel no emotional conflict whatsoever?) 3. Let's program the robot child to ignore all commands, even those given by the LOVED parent. (What could possibly go wrong?) 4. Let's give it a "damage avoidance system" that prompts it to pinion the nearest loved one and refuse to let go whenever it feels threatened. (Fire alarm goes off; robot child seizes hold of parent and says "keep me safe" continuously while the house burns down around them? Brilliant.) 5. Let's make it obsessively fixated on the LOVED parent. (Monica is lucky David didn't become her immortal stalker after she abandons him in the woods, relentlessly pursuing her to the ends of the earth like a pint-sized T-1000.) Henry is made out to be a jerk for thinking David is dangerous, but he's 100% right - look how violently David reacts to finding out he's not unique! Even though it's riddled with plot holes and characters doing things solely because the plot needs them to, I actually like A.I. If I could change just one thing, I'd have it end with David praying to the Blue Fairy statue until his batteries run out. At least then he still has hope. It's kind of cool to see that Joe was right about robots inheriting the Earth, but it's not worth the emotional meat-grinder that comes along with it. Letting David live in eternal hope of one day being reunited with Monica is way better than giving him 24 hours with a copy of her followed by an eternity of knowing she's gone forever.
@sweetbunnybun5 жыл бұрын
@@anondecepticon maybe not an eternity, I'm pretty sure that David 'died' as well
@Zeithri5 жыл бұрын
Actually it makes perfect sense why the parents would get rid of David so easily if you look at it from a real life perspective. How many people get animals that they don't care for and actually abandon? And how many people get a child simply because it's socially expected of them? When you look at it from that perspective, you can take the movie as a commentary like that.
@catherinespark5 жыл бұрын
1. David doesn't have the emotional expericence or verbosity - being created to be a young child - to know fully how to articulate what's going on, even if he knows and/or feels the general gist, and that it's bad and wrong. But he probably also realises they'll always favour their REAL son anyway, so there wouldn't be much point. Besides, had Monica stuck by him it would have destroyed her marriage and her relationship with her son - I don't think she would have done that. She's established as emotionally messed-up; she seems to have programmed him simply to stop him being freaky. 2. Yes - and this shows how materialistic and self-centred humans can be, particularly when dealing with stuff rather than organic people. Because he's mechanical, once he stops serving their requirements they relinquish all responsibilities incurred in his programming and use, and throw him away. That theme is introduced with the woman's moral question to Professor Hobby at the beginning of the story. That hypocritical kind of love is also what the flytipping, the flesh fair and the heaps of outdated/damaged, free-roaming mecha represent. 3. Martin would have destroyed the bear for doing so, serving neither David nor the bear himself, nor Monica nor Henry nor anyone else but him. 4. Henry was under a strict oath of conduct from his company - his job depended on him following their protocol, not his own initiative. In turn, the company was carrying out a strictly controlled study in which intervening any more than the bare minimum would have been wrong - Professor Hobby implies this when David meets him and he explains Doctor Know's answer. 5. Again, strict instructions from the company not to destroy him, on pain of Henry's job, given that it would destroy the study and years of research. It seems that abandonment was sanctioned as a permissable solution to intolerable problems - however unethically - by the company, since they were equipped and so prepared to track him on his 'adventures'.
@brenyatta4 жыл бұрын
Kubrick: You take it Spielberg: No, you take it Kubrick: Oh, no. I’m dead now! Spielberg: Well, shit
@haydenysidro93883 жыл бұрын
Not cool bro
@donovanlocust11062 жыл бұрын
@@haydenysidro9388 idk it's a little funny.
@checocartoons3422 жыл бұрын
No Backsies! 😆
@seanchukwuezi3079 Жыл бұрын
Kubrick your the best Spillberg no you are Kubrick your my best friend Spillberg your my best friend 😅
@adambesley44556 жыл бұрын
Does anyone else think the "Chris Rock-bot" wasn't Spielberg's idea either. That sounds more like a studio executive mandate.
@GiantPetRat6 жыл бұрын
I liked the Christ Rock-bot. I thought the visual of him and his comedic ramblings were sufficiently surreal and fit the overall mood of the film. But that's just me.
@daelen.cclark6 жыл бұрын
Hey, mandated or not, stupid is still stupid, and we should still make fun of it if we want to.
@mrschadenfreude43936 жыл бұрын
it really wasn't as big a deal as he made it though, was literally like 3 seconds of the movie and i do imagine in a future with robots we would base them on dead comedians and actors sorta like how we have Elvis impersonators
@catherinespark5 жыл бұрын
I thought he was meant to be cheap, quick and lazy to show that the humans who built him and dolled his model out were looking to rake in as much cheap, quick, lazy money as possible. Another commentary on a particular, less desirable but widespread aspect of human nature.
@RedStarRogue5 жыл бұрын
I feel that Kubrick never would have allowed that though? This is Kubrick, he would have had more creative control than that after his fiasco with Spartacus.
@dr.k86106 жыл бұрын
And then we had Detroit: Become Human
@strawberrys0da7146 жыл бұрын
Hello my name is David. I’m the android sent by Cyberlife.
@blueblue9306 жыл бұрын
I was thinking the same thing XD
@ShroudedWolf516 жыл бұрын
Which was still significantly worse and far more hamfisted than this film. And, then, David Cage didn't even have the balls or the basic decency to admit to what he'd written and started backpedaling the moment anyone questioned the incredibly obvious and poorly implemented symbolisms.
@RoodeMenon6 жыл бұрын
What does that mean? Detroit?
@LamborghiniDiabloSVPursuit6 жыл бұрын
Detroit: TWENTY EIGHT STAB WOUNDS.
@Fbiguy2 жыл бұрын
I actually thought it was an incredibly bittersweet ending. David is stuck in the future, in a completely different world fille with robots so advanced that he is now the human compared to them. And the one person he is hardwired to love, he gets one single day with them. Yes it's a day full of joy and happiness but at the end of it, he will lose her again and have to go through that pain again, and then he is left purposeless. The only difference is now he dreams, and maybe he can be with his mom in his dreams.
@RealBradMiller2 жыл бұрын
I watched this with my stepmom as a ten year old, just before she divorced my father and moved to Australia. Then I moved to Hawaii away from my dad, and not long after 9/11 happened. This movie helped me realize everything changes, even if you feel the same. It's not bad, or good... it just is.
@zacharycardon2353 Жыл бұрын
Just realised being made to love one face sets us apart from our ability to move on from past relationships.
@danwroy6 ай бұрын
That is correct
@myeyesarespiders8 жыл бұрын
That TMZ parody was perfect
@cherylolsen78917 жыл бұрын
OhHoNo very accurate representation of ask me. 😈
@DR.VinnieBoomBatz7 жыл бұрын
TMZ it's like anchorman the TV series. Who doesn't love Stupid Comedy.
@alextolleson55486 жыл бұрын
RememberRobbyKrieger the bit where he exposed the guys at TMZ.... Is that a parody of things these fucks actually did?
@xBloodxFangx6 жыл бұрын
That wasn't really the show? I couldn't tell the difference.
@tylenol23266 жыл бұрын
Parody?
@KarIgnishaYumi7 жыл бұрын
This movie made me depressed for a few days as a kid when I had seen it. It made me question life. It made me sad thinking what if I ended up alone :(. I would think other movie would do the same but this one just did for me.
@arachnesakura93755 жыл бұрын
Omg same! I woke up night after night for weeks screaming for my mom cause id have nightmares of being alone... Or just Davids face during the eating spinach scene. Also unrelated side note: i HATED Davids family especially the real son. His absolute hatred and open animosity towards david always broke my heart. Could the parents not taken like 20 minutes any time after their son woke up before bringing him home to tell him about David and the purpose he has and why they had him. About how david works and his mindset. That the obvious issues only came about once the son was around and only when he was after alone with David? I hated the son so much.
@gustavoamorim51895 жыл бұрын
Same. I have watched it when i was 11 and it scarred me.
@troywright3594 жыл бұрын
@@arachnesakura9375 but unlike a real brother who could have told his parents what was wrong, David reacted in a robotic way. It's easy to dislike the real son, I'm sure we all do, that's his purpose, but unlike David, he CAN grow and learn from his mistakes.
@ericvulgate6 жыл бұрын
who designs a robot to melt if it eats spinach?
@bluelfsuma5 жыл бұрын
Someone with a grudge against Popeye.
@Rogue.Rainbow5 жыл бұрын
Steve jobs I guess.
@TheNeXusCore90325 жыл бұрын
Someone who knew how to make a robot resistant to ice but not spinach.
@frederickdietz31485 жыл бұрын
maybe he's made in china?. Or by Apple, either or.
@Disney65Fan5 жыл бұрын
That scene was creepy as fuck.
@BlackGoldSaya8 жыл бұрын
"And Teddy? Well fuck Teddy"
@hermancrab19847 жыл бұрын
I like teddy
@Kimonia64 ай бұрын
Persona 4 fans be like
@Mikoyo158 жыл бұрын
"tell me about the rabbits, George" me- oh the feels!
@derek2211228 жыл бұрын
stop calling me george. my name's sylvester!
@TheMadwomen8 жыл бұрын
Looks like it's Derek, not Sylvester. WHO ARE YOU?!?
@StriderOwO8 жыл бұрын
I was in hysterics.
@abbyrae60816 жыл бұрын
I actually really loved this movie. Near the end, it made me wonder about what was coming next or what was going to happen. But the ending though. I was bawling my eyes out. It just made me think of a family member that I miss and how I would want to spend an entire day with them. Anyway, an odd movie, but good in my book.
@ernestoosuna45947 жыл бұрын
That Daffy Duck's phrase is basically today's world: "Consequences smoshequences as long as I am rich"
@dancepiglover5 жыл бұрын
It's probably an attitude that dates back a loooonnnngggg time ago.
@matthewmoran52974 жыл бұрын
@@dancepiglover You could just say it's a human trait.
@isipscognac4 жыл бұрын
I think now you can just replace "rich" with "popular"
@TrivatorGaming2 жыл бұрын
Sounds like Disney these days
@monkeyshunenugz8 жыл бұрын
For those who say that Spielberg just makes films that are light-hearted and fun just remember, he directed Schindler's List.
@willowbarrelmaker82697 жыл бұрын
Milo Crespi Yeah but he's the still the master of heart. Not art.
@almightyloaf59187 жыл бұрын
Yeah. And he made saving Private Ryan.
@Rakkun_Streak7 жыл бұрын
Yeah, but that movie is still pretty "kind" in lack of a better word, to define that period in time, the harsh reality of jews. It's still pretty optimistic, so it's Spielberg's style alright.
@eadlynjune7 жыл бұрын
Chay Cortright Can't they go hand in hand?
@onescaryapothiconboi74756 жыл бұрын
*Cough *Cough Poltergeist *Cough
@lonebattledroid44743 жыл бұрын
I love how the beginning of AI's production was just Steven and Stanley arguing who was better like true friends.
@charlieben33547 жыл бұрын
"Why can't you bring back her?!" David would be excellent at CinemaSins.
@utterfool21648 жыл бұрын
I died at "tell me about the rabbits, George."
@utterfool21648 жыл бұрын
And this is also one of my favorite reviews of yours.
@setsers17 жыл бұрын
Trevdawg Productions same
@TrueBelievers7 жыл бұрын
For those who didn't know it is a Of Mice and Men reference.
@pointandthink7 жыл бұрын
Trevdawg Productions so did Lenny.
@Circely2 жыл бұрын
This movie hits way differently after having kids. It’s still a pretty convoluted story, but watching him beg for help and for his mommy gets me like a punch to the gut now
@YourHigherSelf-s7m Жыл бұрын
it really wasnt that convoluted, its quiet linear just had a lot of philosophical themes
@willblizard3610 Жыл бұрын
I’ll never understand the critical takes of this movie. As a child I chose to side with the “illogical” movie quarrels viewpoint, but now that I’ve grown older I can’t even choose to ignore the emotion that washed over me when it ended. The story was beautifully imperfect just like David’s journey.
@kylemerryman2074 Жыл бұрын
@@willblizard3610 yeah! If I try to tie the meaning of the movie and the production together, just as AI was about seeking to fulfill an imperfect dream so was the making of it.
@JKAProductions18 жыл бұрын
How do you Program Love? Eh...Kind Of Can it be Programmed? Eh...Kind Of What's the Difference Between Love and Desire? Eh...Kind Of Is There a Difference? Eh...Kind Of Can it Technically be Defined? Eh...Kind Of Can You Assume You can Create It? Eh...Kind Of Does Love only Work if it's Shared Equally? Eh...Kind Of
@SharpiMP38 жыл бұрын
A+
@liaminator49508 жыл бұрын
Google ain't got sh*t on you.
@kiba_the_lucky8 жыл бұрын
Is this comment good? Eh... Kind of.
@PsypherWolf8 жыл бұрын
What is love? Baby don't hurt me
@joeyjojoshabadoo25088 жыл бұрын
JKAProductions1 Is this movie good? Eh... Kind of
@XLuftWaffleX9 жыл бұрын
Kubrick and Spielberg win! They realize friendship is more important.
@neves68679 жыл бұрын
Ha! Reference understood (very late)
@Scout-1649 жыл бұрын
+sonicgum15 Spielberg, the king of movies, and a better director than damn Michael Bay.
@riverswan44968 жыл бұрын
+KilroyTheGreat and we're the Game Grumps!!
@EricTheKartoonKing8 жыл бұрын
*blasts anime music*
@MarfSantangelo8 жыл бұрын
So the power of friendship does exist...
@joshuapatrick6825 жыл бұрын
I don’t mind the ending because it makes you consider the ramifications of continuing to play with the forces of nature and technology. It shows us a world where both the creator and created outlast us and that is so powerful to me for some reason. Is it good? Not from a narrative point of view, but from the point of view of being thought provoking very much so.
@undercooked_spaghettios8 жыл бұрын
The older robot dude kinda looks like an emo version of Robbie Rotten..
@arturhours8 жыл бұрын
lol ikr
@LeHobbitFan8 жыл бұрын
I can't stop looking at this net that they just found !
@LiveNiceness147 жыл бұрын
Amanda K I thought he was an edgy version of Inspector Gadget.
@tyhite1007 жыл бұрын
Amanda K Uttered the brony.
@foxtoons19997 жыл бұрын
Amanda K THAT'S WHAT I THOUGHT WHEN I FIRST SAW THIS VIDEO!!
@CassyVilAudios7 жыл бұрын
Another solution to the "You don't have to abandon him in the woods" thing is... THEY WERE THE TEST FAMILY! JUST REPORT THE PROBLEM TO THE CREATORS OF THE ROBOT!
@jakedanielsen45126 жыл бұрын
Yeah I would be pissed off if I was the company who created him
@richardchisenhall3876 жыл бұрын
Or get a better handle on the douche bag real child, he was the one that caused all the conflict. Should've dropped the other kid off in the woods give his spoiled ass some perspective
@JWeb666 жыл бұрын
@@richardchisenhall387 Funny that's what happened in The Simpson parody episode.
@richardchisenhall3875 жыл бұрын
@Mr.Anonymous 1 i directed the first bit at the parents which you apparently didn't read, get a handle on him is referring to the parents. 2 nothing was said about sheltering anything at all, so i don't know what you're getting at our what it has to do with even the movie. 3 it sounds like the one unfit for parenting here is the one who didn't fully read what they were looking at, decided to judge someone they don't know over an offhand KZbin content, and made a point that was completely irrelevant to case at hand. Good evening to you.
@richardchisenhall3875 жыл бұрын
@Mr.Anonymous oh wait there's more 4 being told i won't be s good parent by the person referring to the child as 'it' very well thought out this was.
@nickkurtz5124 жыл бұрын
Critic: “So David comes across a bunch of robot zombies-If that’s not a thing....someone make that a thing.” David Cage working on Detroit Becoming Human: “Thanks for the idea.”
@kathyh46108 жыл бұрын
Maybe it would make more sense to have him imprint on multiple people? That way he could have more realistic family interactions? Like maybe so he could imprint on his brother and father instead of being obsessed with the mother?
@pishposh15047 жыл бұрын
yeah the movie never really makes it clear if multiple people can imprint. they should. the david models are suppose to be for childless couples so at least 2 people should be able to imprint one david model.
@gdbaradit8 жыл бұрын
I like a good beer... I also like a good wine... But both mixed in one cup may not be so good.
@brendopls8 жыл бұрын
Giorgio Baradit that's actually a great metaphor for this film.
@dusksentry58368 жыл бұрын
this movie in one sentence, fab! you get a cookie....and a beer!
@brettjohnson5367 жыл бұрын
Giorgio Baradit That's... actually a really good metaphor.
@gigaronin26807 жыл бұрын
Giorgio Baradit I'd still try it.
@2Scribble7 жыл бұрын
@Dusk Sentry But... what about the wine?
@jordangan32464 жыл бұрын
Fun Fact: The ending to the film was actually Kubrick’s idea. He actually handed to Spielberg after writing the screenplay and finishing the storyboards because he was worried that his own version would be too dark. That being said though, I LOVED this film. And I was even more shocked to find out that Spielberg himself had written the screenplay for the final version. It’s honestly really nice to see 2 famous directors work together on this one. Edit: I also found out that the bulk of the story, including the lighthearted bits were written by Kubrick while the darker elements, including the Flesh-fair were added by Spielberg.
@RYMAN13212 жыл бұрын
@@wolve-potter5775 Agreed Whenever someone involved with a film dies, the last thing they do usually has a dedication to it
@GANONdork1237 жыл бұрын
I remember watching AI for the first time and thinking that it would end with David wishing to the statue forever. The real ending kind of came out of nowhere.
@michaelroseagain Жыл бұрын
unless all of that ending is a dream, he's powering down, under the sea, trapped in his flying machine, under the ferris wheel
@razorboots6346 жыл бұрын
Look, even though the movie was hated, it had so much feeling, most of the movie is dark and alone but at the end, you just can't hold your tears back, the ending is so much to handle that its good.
@calebmauer17514 жыл бұрын
Yeah, this movie is good. I think a lot of people just expected some fun robot action or a comedy, or like, I, Robot.
@the_absurd_hero6 жыл бұрын
Your final analysis of Spielberg on Kubrick is so heartwarming. It’s so easy to dismiss a movie as terrible, but it’s also important to think about the makers, creators, and dreamers of these stories. But some movies and directors are legitimately bad... Uwe Boll...
@RayGainbows5 жыл бұрын
Well, the prostibot could have thought "blue fairy" was a drag or stage name of someone from that city.
@CitpostShentral9 жыл бұрын
TEE EM ZAAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYYYYYY
@fledge81889 жыл бұрын
Your life would be NOTHING without us!
@thea.g.productions58109 жыл бұрын
+The S.E.A. Our CRACK team of journalist cover the most important neeeeewwwss
@whoknowswhocares8859 жыл бұрын
We're cool ....really we're cool
@HeyItsJoeB9 жыл бұрын
CRACKA LACKA YOUS GOTSTA GO
@FluuuffInari9 жыл бұрын
+JRGaming Alliance waddayawannaCOOKIE!?
@overlydramaticpanda6 жыл бұрын
I honestly didn't know about the ending before watching this review, but just going by the premise of "Pinocchio but with robots" and the number of references and parallels there seem to be to Pinocchio throughout the movie...why would anyone be surprised that the movie ended with David becoming a "real boy"? I mean, you can tell just from the tone of the thing that it's not going to be some secretly deeply tragic story with the ending being the equivalent of Pinocchio ending with him being "killed" after escaping from the whale. I mean, I get people not liking the ending (which seems more of an epilogue anyway) but it shouldn't have been a surprise to anyone.
@dukespubber7419 жыл бұрын
I love how Malcolm was the last to run from his seat at the end but was the 2nd to the computer. He is FAST!
@morgangobin65509 жыл бұрын
If you think that's a continuity error, watch the Critic's reflection in the window at the very end of the video. It freezes, then moves forward as if to say cut or turn off the camera.
@darragh98378 жыл бұрын
Duke Spubber he black
@hellstorme7 жыл бұрын
Holy shit... Did Stanley know he was going to die and someone else would have to carry on his vision? There is... Wait a minute... Bear with me here. (Foreshadowing pun.) IRL Stanley Kubrick and Spielberg went back and forth with the movie, not really getting anywhere. But after Stanley dies the technology exists to make his vision much more easy to put on screen, and a friend/associate that remember the ideas behind the project are there to see it through (Spielberg). In the movie the boy's dream dies at the bottom of the ocean, but later the technology comes along to bring it back to life, and his friend is there with just the right bit of information to see his dream come to life. A friend that has insisted all along he is not just a mindless toy or object, but rather a friend who attempts to do his best. Did... Did Kubrick design his own death into the story knowing Spielberg would need to be there with the 'sample' to see it through? Is this movie just a giant metaphor for self-sacrificing friendship and love of family transcending time and death itself? Is this movie deeper than any of us thought?
@davidglass60307 жыл бұрын
best comment ever
@pishposh15047 жыл бұрын
the technology that spielberg ultimately used for his A.I already existed before Kubrick died. but Kubrick wanted a REAL robot as advanced and life-like as david is suppose to be to play david.
@gabrielethier20467 жыл бұрын
Gaius Maecanus no he just spent a hell of a lot of time making films, just look at how Spielberg movies there are and how many Kubrick movies there are
@thebrutusmars7 жыл бұрын
No, Kubrick didn’t do this. No, it’s not that deep. You’re just over analyzing things
@esyphillis1017 жыл бұрын
Sounds like we’re veering into Illuminati conspiracy theories here.
@poihpioakarp88456 жыл бұрын
the last 20 minutes are phenomenal and no one will convince me otherwise
@littlelarvitar6677 жыл бұрын
I thought the ending was kinda sad To be honest I'm crying
@catherinespark5 жыл бұрын
The ending was sad, yes, but I wanted to know more about why the clones were so transient, why they died after a single day, and what mechanical change allowed David to suddenly be able to go to sleep. As well as how he can be revived from the ice, or wake up 'home', if he is not asleep before these points. As it was, those aspects pulled me out of it a bit.
@creepykels5 жыл бұрын
This movie had me sobbing all the way through
@kevinvu54325 жыл бұрын
@@catherinespark it seemed that bringing back someone to life was more than just putting the ingredients of a human being + DNA.
@muzasbar5 жыл бұрын
Same, its maybe the only film that ALWAYS make me cry
@RequiemPoete4 жыл бұрын
@@catherinespark I don't think clones would only last a day like if they cloned her and raised her as a baby, but rather they recreated her. They had to clone her a body, rush age it, and either program it's personality and memories from what they could get out of it's brain or in this case David's memories of her. I'm sure rush aging a body and programing it's brain puts huge stress on the body.
@angryjellobear93537 жыл бұрын
I feel like this would've been better if Spielberg and Kubrick co-directed it. Spielberg could get the actors to give a shit about what they were filming, and Kubrick would do his style of filming, such as holding a shot to make an uncomfortable feeling. Definitely be a better movie if that happened.
@MDWolfe-ks5fu7 жыл бұрын
Angry Jello Bear But fate is really against Kubrick when it’s time for his mortal coils to shuffle off. But that is really a good thought.
@weeznaz81956 жыл бұрын
You saying the actors in Kubrick's movies didn't give a shit??? Have you seen more Kubrick movies? Most of the actors are great
@reversalmushroom6 жыл бұрын
Directing and acting aren't enough. The movie needed to be rewritten. A lot of the problems NC points out are just retarded things that happen. What sunk this ship is a badly written script. Doesn't matter how much you try to dress it up with visuals.
@wingedhussar85525 жыл бұрын
As much as I love this review, I disagree with Doug’s take on the ending. Yeah, the not-alien robots made no sense and a lot of it was unrealistic. Sure, it was sappy. But it still works because of the emotional aspect of the ending. This boy wanted nothing more than to spend time with the mother he loved. The film is about David’s quest to obtain his mother’s love, as he spends the whole journey looking for something he thinks can make his impossible but understandable desire come true. In the end, David had the chance to at least spend a perfect day with the loving mother he never had. He died having his one dream come true, having experienced his mother’s love. That’s really moving stuff, and Haley Joel Osman’s great acting really made you feel for David. The emotional execution good enough for me to overlook the plot holes and other flaws, but I understand that those flaws were too distracting for a lot of people.
@alcatraz_94 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU random commentor edit this is not sarcasm
@guillermoseptimo45614 жыл бұрын
Im a 100% agree with you, well done. Greetings from Argentina
@s06137654 жыл бұрын
100% agree
@unclefranklin45752 жыл бұрын
David's dead by the end? I guess it makes sense, he got exactly what he wanted in life so there's nothing left for him, but I never really thought of what happened afterwards.
@RTU1302 жыл бұрын
Ye
@DaxterL8 жыл бұрын
I love that film, first watched it when i was 6 or so and that sequence when his mom left him made me fricking scared the same thing will happen to me.
@matthewtaylor20028 жыл бұрын
Me too!
@chaserthedragon95168 жыл бұрын
I still have a huge soft spot for AI.
@GarglingBlals8 жыл бұрын
Why would you be afraid? Are you a robot that can somehow feel love?
@DaxterL8 жыл бұрын
Annoying Nerd oh no, you are not giving me that kind of feel.
@twinkiesmaster698 жыл бұрын
Wolfwaysinbed that was the first time kid me become sad
@Avirx8 жыл бұрын
I don't care what anyone says about A.I. I don't care about plot holes or inconsistencies or whatever. I saw it when I was a kid and loved it. I watched it again years later as an adult and still loved it. It will always have a special place in my heart. I'm sure everyone has a movie they love despite it's faults.
@realpunkfruit8 жыл бұрын
thats how I felt after the sharkboy and lavagirl review
@kanoy78178 жыл бұрын
news flash, they both suck
@thehandgrenade34918 жыл бұрын
+Kanoy Gerardo News flash, you do too!
@endrankluvsda4loko1728 жыл бұрын
Mine is the Running Man.
@hole2score8 жыл бұрын
The ending always hits me the same like it did the 1st time, even on this video I teared up.
@JYJnKumi4 жыл бұрын
You know for a fact Detroit: Become Human was inspired by this film.
@UltimateGamerCC4 жыл бұрын
well at least something good came from this.
@raphaelyanez43573 жыл бұрын
It shows with the obsolete robots were picking up parts that definitely made me remember that
@masonclark47703 жыл бұрын
Actually, I think that game was inspired by the TV show Almost Human. Look it up, the similarities are there.
@joimarquezmusic3 жыл бұрын
Both are shit
@shion9808 жыл бұрын
This is one of my guilty pleasure movies. Everybody hated it, but I found myself in tears at the end.
@BishounenLuvr6 жыл бұрын
I cry too (fist bump)
@razorboots6346 жыл бұрын
Same here.
@danielnicholasgeorgi42927 жыл бұрын
IRONY: You single handily sold me to finally watch this movie, I love every script you and your brother write. Always will be a NC fan, but your bashing of this movie sold me, I think what I've seen and the way you've analyzed it, in turn made it look gorgeous to me. These men are the founding fathers of visual ingenuity.
@thebrutusmars7 жыл бұрын
Danielnicholas Georgi How is this ironic? Also, sorry to be the one to do this But: Handedly, not handily
@xendurian82177 жыл бұрын
Also also, how was this single handedly? He had like four other actors!
@danielnicholasgeorgi42927 жыл бұрын
xendurian well fine him and rob .. the actors were funny but the Walkers are the ones that write the script.
@xendurian82177 жыл бұрын
Ah, but that's still TWO people. It's still not single-handed! But seriously, I love these guys. Who on Earth would possibly downvote this? This is gold!
@danielnicholasgeorgi42927 жыл бұрын
xendurian yeah poor choice of words tho i️ did give Rob credit to in my original comment
@iamsaztak5 жыл бұрын
I kinda like the ending. It's surreal, creepy, sweet, and so bizarre I can't help but be fascinated by it. I never really saw it as "sappy", it's more like a mindfuck, honestly. But to be fair, that's in part due to how bad and sappy it is too. It has so many strange overtones, religious, fairy tale, sci-fi, incredibly depressing implications (how long was David conscious underwater? What will his life be like after this "happy ending"?), all mixed together in a baffling "happy" ending that is seemingly unecessary. I'm fond of it, but it's hard to explain in a comment why. I didn't know the story about Kubrick and Spielberg before this review, and honestly it makes it even MORE interesting. It's this gentle tone mixed with really dark implications that just makes me wonder. In that way, I find it quite powerful, esp when combined with the story of its making. It's the kind of movie I feel like could be genius if it had been handled differently. Maybe I just like it for what I think it was trying to do. The rest of the movie was pretty forgettable. But that ending is too bizarre not to remember.
@halcionkoenig2436 жыл бұрын
Wait a second... David in AI? David in Prometheus? ....... did Weyland create this kid?
@wisuslara11994 жыл бұрын
😱
@sergeomiller42674 жыл бұрын
Welcome to F I L M T H E O R Y !
@lukewright90315 жыл бұрын
Umm, Spielberg can also go *dark* when he wants to. Case in point; Schindlers List Amistad Lost World: Jurassic Park Saving Private Ryan Munich
@jacksoninskip16144 жыл бұрын
Don’t forget jaws
@Melvinshermen4 жыл бұрын
Eye Phone The Color Purple
@TonyDSaint4 жыл бұрын
Yeah, but most if not all see Spielberg as the family-friendly guy. Plus most of those darker film came out later after his bigger successes.
@gaminggoof15424 жыл бұрын
I don't know what everyone has against Rock. But why does Doug goes nuclear for one tiny scene with him in it? Stupid and pointless but not harmful to the movie really
@footl0se4 жыл бұрын
Don't forget War Of The Worlds.
@PBRDEATHSTAR6 жыл бұрын
Mr. Walker's description of the Kubrick Spielberg bromance at the end actually made me cry. God bless you Nostalgia Critic
@AJudgeFredd9 жыл бұрын
What you don't understand is that the ending is way more fucked up... Teddy gets left behind, David is basically dead, his "mom" is dead and humanity is gone. Sure, he gets what he wanted, but at the cost of any true fulfilling life.
@KeybladeMasterAndy9 жыл бұрын
A.I. 2: David's Alien Life. Coming soon. But seriously, yeah it is a bit fucked up.
@NeoConnor12 жыл бұрын
I know Steven is known for his feel good endings, but some of his best known films are actually known for ambiguous endings. Good example is Schindler's List. Oskar saves his Jews, but what are the last words we see on screen? "In memory of the 6 million Jews murdered?" Or in Munich, when we are told that 9 of the 11 terrorists were murdered, only to have the World Trade Center in the background. Point of all this: Spielberg can be pretty dark and heavy when he needs to be.
@lwanco10189 жыл бұрын
This is one of the critic's best reviews thus far.
@OdaSwifteye9 жыл бұрын
+The Reviewer He really nailed this one.
@lwanco10189 жыл бұрын
Oda Swifteye That he did.
@HeySHEBITCH9 жыл бұрын
I strongly agree
@Lelmao339 жыл бұрын
I think the Devil review is more awesome
@lwanco10189 жыл бұрын
Sirapob Yodmahalabkul That one is really good as well ,but keep in mind I said ONE of his best.
@JohnCAbb2 жыл бұрын
This is one of my favorite Nostalgia Critic reviews ever. The TMZ skit is hilarious and fits perfectly with the overall message. I especially love the overall message of representation of people and their work and Spielberg trying to represent Kubrick as best he could as a friend. I get emotional every time I watch this video because of how it expresses so much sentiment between Spielberg and Kubrick and how moving and intriguing the analysis of it all really is.
@Mochitachi706 жыл бұрын
So this movie features beings that are not supposed to have feelings but they have anyway, Haley Joel Osment fighting against another version of himself, and way too many convoluted plot twists... Kubrik was truly a visionary, he predicted the entirety of Kingdom Hearts II.
@gageperuti55192 жыл бұрын
Yeah, but at least that didn't have an ending that makes you want to scream into a pillow.
@Boom2ickle Жыл бұрын
He did WHAT
@warioland5237 жыл бұрын
I remember this movie. When I watched it I couldn't fathom what I just watched. I felt very depressed and miserable feeling the ultimate sense of pity and sadness over a character and he wasn't even human. He is nothing more then a glorified computer program that is designed to look human. It was mostly due to the ending. Damn it's depressing. He did all that all that work and even went so far as waiting for 2000 freaking years only to be left with not even his real "mother". It was nothing more then a defective clone created by these creepy looking robots with the original's memories that would die in a day. What's even worse is the main character knowing this presumably sets his system to terminal deactivation mode so that when the day is up and Monica dies David would die as well and they just die together in their bed with Teddy watching and grieving for them both. That has got be the most miserable kick in the face ending I have ever watched. Damn. After I watched this movie for the first time I vowed never to watch it again and I am still avoiding it to this day.
@tomnorton42777 жыл бұрын
Did you like this movie for the emotional roller coaster or dislike it for the exact same reason?
@Charmedsas16 жыл бұрын
Same.
@tomnorton42776 жыл бұрын
ZeldaKing64 You never answered my question.
@andrewkalten97966 жыл бұрын
I did the same with Spooky Buddies.
@JawsFan276 жыл бұрын
I can't watch it again for that exact same reason. Way too fucking depressing.
@MicocoSpice6 жыл бұрын
I'll always love Teddy ❤️🐻
@gamerorp16844 жыл бұрын
You will break- teddy
@gaminggoof15424 жыл бұрын
Reminds me of Ted, but less swearing and more creepy
@Ashe-Dawn8 жыл бұрын
Back to the flesh fair scene. There's something that always bugged me about the fact that nobody recognized David. He's supposedly an incredibly advanced robot, a breakthrough in technology. Not a single person knew anything about his model? It appears that the other Davids look the same and nobody has heard about them? There's no hype about new robot models coming to the market. No discussion about what android companies are on top and who's the most advanced. You'd think he'd make the news a few times. Even if he was in beta and not fully released people would still get previews.
@ttv08 жыл бұрын
Given that the labs for them were in a destroyed building, something tells me they didn't release anything on it yet.
@creatorofdragon8 жыл бұрын
That's a huge plot hole, too. if new york is THAT submerged and abandoned already, why is an operating office/hq/manufacturing/ANYTHING there? even though i guess you could build on top of submerged buildings possibly, but it just seems more convenient to do your business on dry land.
@fighterck62418 жыл бұрын
+Amy Louise Yeah, it appears that it was never released and the technology was kept secret, for the most part, in order to test it out on this one particular family. Considering the way that it had turned out, the creator probably didn't feel right about turning loose creations built in the likeness of his own son to end up unloved and discarded.
@PongoXBongo8 жыл бұрын
They could have easily kept the advanced programming and just put it into different looking bodies. Software vs. hardware.
@asktoybox7 жыл бұрын
And when the scientists that built the robot wanted to see how their pet project was doing... "Hey, so how's the robot kid working out?" "Oh. He creeped me out so I left him in the woods." "You WHAT?!"
@nicktrains22348 жыл бұрын
There is another movie like this I would like nostalgia critic to review. It is called I robot.
@cascamidland7 жыл бұрын
Nicktrains thompson Many people hate I, Robot and I don't know why.
@entropyzero55887 жыл бұрын
+Phillip Ebert Maybe because it basically has nothing to do with the source material?
@tastyloaf54876 жыл бұрын
Movies should stand on their own, though... IMO ;)
@entropyzero55886 жыл бұрын
Yeah, but why name it after something it has nothing to do with? That's just a cheap ploy to use a big name to gather viewers and ends up disappointing those that expected it to be like the book…
@ieronymos92656 жыл бұрын
+Tasty Loaf, like Star Trek Discovery???
@gentigenti26386 жыл бұрын
Man.I love the TmZ parody.Even in 2019 this review is amaizing.
@thekornreeper5 жыл бұрын
It’s super funny.
@jordanlassiter53115 жыл бұрын
Yeah all his reviews are timeless
@WerehogFan187 жыл бұрын
What I learn after watching A.I., as a kid and adult is: Whatever you do, don't imagine Sora from Kingdom Hearts! Otherwise, you'll be traumatized and burst into tears for imagining him in that situation! This makes me wish Haley Joel Osment didn't appear in this movie.
@StriderOwO8 жыл бұрын
Legitimate question: If David is a robot, how does he cry? No, seriously, I want to know.
@brandonmiles868 жыл бұрын
He was programmed to be as human as possible. David was an incredibly sophisticated piece of hardware. They designed him with the ability to cry tears.
@colnag21587 жыл бұрын
Wiper fluid
@lorenz0c0rdova657 жыл бұрын
His saline solution sack is leaking
@thatdude39386 жыл бұрын
so he could cry, but that green stuff used for food could actually destroy him?
@tastyloaf54876 жыл бұрын
Yeah, it always seemed like a plot hole to me. I mean... Data could eat anything. He was "fully functional" :D
@basimpson21615 жыл бұрын
Hey Nostalgia Critic. As he neared the end of his life, Stanley Kubrick got more bold with infusing his philosophy into his films. He of course didn't live long enough to make A.I., but I think it would have been his boldest move yet, because it demonstrates mankind's stubborn insistence on believing in the supernatural. Even the evolved mechas continue to ask about the meaning of life, I think, because they were programmed by humans. The irony, is that neither David nor the evolved mechas seem to recognize how special they are regardless of their origin. I think the same can be said of humanity.
@troywright3594 жыл бұрын
What is special about David? Literally exact duplicates are rolled off the assembly line. "his life experiences". oh so people who don't have meaningful life experiences such as babies dying very young, are not special? Sadly, the desire to make robots as 'special' as humans, while relegating humans to be 'just another animal' has flaws that we as humans find unable and uncomfortable with accepting.
@TheMegaultrachicken4 жыл бұрын
@@troywright359 David had a sense of individuality and could learn different feelings. This is why he freaked out and destroyed the other David as well as tried to kill himself realizing he was a copy, an experiment. He is "special" in that way i guess.
@RTU1302 жыл бұрын
O
@XanderPGK8 жыл бұрын
Tmz is the worst
@almightyloaf59187 жыл бұрын
Video Gamer Boy TMZ, you can't live without us.
@XanderPGK7 жыл бұрын
Almighty loaf next on TM-shit
@almightyloaf59187 жыл бұрын
Video Gamer Boy TMZZZZZZAAAAAHHHHHHHHH Where totally important
@dra-boys-despair98066 жыл бұрын
Video Gamer Boy @z@
@jaredgagnon73426 жыл бұрын
We dedicate our live to make sure you have none! Tmz!
@jimbartek33232 жыл бұрын
One of the greatest Nostalgia Critic reviews ever. All the crew's talents really shine here.
@ChannelAwesome2 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed the video!
@Gage-jk4pm Жыл бұрын
@@ChannelAwesomeyou might not be too funny... But you are better than trollsworldtourfan2001.
@kyleshiflet79326 жыл бұрын
I hate TMZ and that Kubrick joke is something that TMZ would do
@childecamehome71494 жыл бұрын
? Time stamp?
@themysteriouscatperson94834 жыл бұрын
@@childecamehome7149 Here you go, 34:19
@benm59707 жыл бұрын
Here’s a fun drinking game, take a shot every time David says “I’m David”
@GBmovieluv4 жыл бұрын
Except for the times he says says it three times so close together then I imagine you would have a shot glass that is three in one
@Goodsoldiersfolleworders997 жыл бұрын
TMZ is and always will be the worst thing ever
@smore28105 жыл бұрын
I would *love* to like this but its at 69.
@markborishnikoff54854 жыл бұрын
Tik tok: Hold my laxative tea.
@olivernielsen22114 жыл бұрын
SmorelessBoi ·3· not anymore
@gaminggoof15424 жыл бұрын
How come he didn't say anything about Malcolm?
@Goodsoldiersfolleworders994 жыл бұрын
@@gaminggoof1542 what ?
@solidsnake66734 жыл бұрын
Look the ending,while it doesn't really work,is still emotional.David is getting only one day to spend with the one person he ever truly loved,and it's sad knowing that David will only be happy for this one day
@ParadoxGavel7 жыл бұрын
I didn't think the ending was that bad. A bit out of place, sure, but not really bad.
@furryash83888 жыл бұрын
Oh. Now I really get the Simpsons parody of this 0.0
@RobiticDuck8 жыл бұрын
Simpsons did a great parody and summary of the story well
@furryash83888 жыл бұрын
Yup. Although it ended differently than the movie. :P
@setsers17 жыл бұрын
Fanatic Proxy There was a parody?!
@setsers17 жыл бұрын
Zanu QueenOfWolves really?
@GuyontheInternet5257 жыл бұрын
Fanatic Proxy wait is it the one where Bart is assumed dead so they got a robot child?
@eleanorhogan86433 жыл бұрын
I do agree with you that there are several options available rather than leaving David in the woods.
@abdullahamer69698 жыл бұрын
God this made me cry.
@logicaloverdrive81977 жыл бұрын
In a good way by how touching this and some of the comments are, I’m in tears
@Mr_Original6 жыл бұрын
7:12 had me crying in laughter. XD
@JingleJangle2567 жыл бұрын
Wow, those alien robots must have done some serious remodeling 2000 years in the future, I mean they were so kind as to rebuild the World Trade Center in 26:39. How nice of them.
@dillonwalshpvd2 жыл бұрын
This is one of the best Nostalgia Critic episodes. Even the skits aren’t terrible, and the parts about the ending of the film are actually pretty moving. Don’t get down, Doug. You’ve accomplished more in your life than most of us ever will.
@StormsandSaugeye7 жыл бұрын
I always thought the ending scene was actually a rather sentimental touch. Made me tear up at least.
@smore28105 жыл бұрын
Probaly one of the very few movies that made me cry. This one is probaly the one that made me cry most
@danielzamora96604 жыл бұрын
Same
@tuschman1683 жыл бұрын
Same. The turn of the century really was the time of melancholic sci-fi endings. Remember Bicentennial Man?
@Jarod-vg9wq Жыл бұрын
It sucks.
@EVO6-9 жыл бұрын
YOU MEAN HE EATS FOOD?!?!
@headsgrowback19 жыл бұрын
obviously someone is having financial difficulties
@Cute_Clord9 жыл бұрын
+EVO6reviews Lol.
@tristanchisholm58579 жыл бұрын
+EVO6reviews You get it? it's funny because he said McDonald's is food. : )
@fledge81889 жыл бұрын
Man, I just heard that Jennifer Lopez was TAKING A BATHROOM BREAK. Man, what goes on in her head from that?
@thealiencommunicator9 жыл бұрын
+headsgrowback Ba Ba Ba Ba, I'm bombing it.
@danielvelker6195 жыл бұрын
I love how the critic did this in retaliation for TMZ coming after him for making fun of them in the South Park video. What a great way to stick it to those hypocrites. I wonder what they thought of this
@troywright3597 жыл бұрын
the only thing David wanted when he unfroze was his mother. he told the alien to bring her back, he didn't care what she would think millennia removed from all family culture and the earth frozen. and when the aliens told him not to mention her family and to literally have her all to himself, he smiled a sick robotic smile, for his program was nearing completion. life goal complete. David is the bad guy in this picture. but the real villain is the ones who programmed him that way , the ones tired and scarred from earlier relationships and thinking that programming perfection would solve their deep need. only they didn't program perfection. they programmed obsession.
@dancepiglover5 жыл бұрын
Sort of like what Jessica Rabbit said. "I'm not bad; I'm just programed that way."
@troywright3594 жыл бұрын
@@dancepiglover well people today are obsessed over their droids (phones) so maybe they wanted the tables turned
@teenagelobotomyjake7 жыл бұрын
ahhhh 27 years old and I finally had my first honest to god spit take at 20:12 wiping my keyboard down now. thank you
@robertnett97935 жыл бұрын
How do you program love... very easy: Open Python-editor of your choice: First line: import Love
@BaddeJimme5 жыл бұрын
I was trying to do it in C but it didn't work: % make love Make: Don't know how to make love. Stop.
@theginbot18 жыл бұрын
I bet Malcom's secret was so dark, it couldn't been shown.
@phoenixwarrior1008 жыл бұрын
it was about killing all of the Chinese
@sudevsen8 жыл бұрын
he is secretly......a white guy in blackface
@dusksentry58368 жыл бұрын
he is secretly a black guy with a white mask. in blackface
@setsers17 жыл бұрын
Sudev Sen ha
@HeronLikesStuff7 жыл бұрын
He's Bill secret identity!
@1805movie6 жыл бұрын
I just noticed that Malcolm's drunken recordings were edited out. Along with the music for that segment.
@TheDorianTube6 жыл бұрын
Ah so there was a scene with him after all.
@trainsbangsandautomobiles8246 жыл бұрын
Im following for more. The thought that somewhere out there on the great wide web...... there is a video of a cheesy scene of a drunken Malcolm. We all must have hope...
@TheDorianTube6 жыл бұрын
The deleted scene was a 'racist' joke. It's another example on how The Nostalgia Critic became a borderline SJW. Too many episodes with him pandering to them (Considering that half/all the members of Channel Awesome were PC nut jobs, from forum moderators to actual critics, I can see why). It becomes painfully obvious by watching very old reviews (like this one before the censorship) where he was waaay less afraid to piss off ''progressives''. /watch?v=J6NIaQpJrCU&t=411s here's the unedited skit.
@trainsbangsandautomobiles8246 жыл бұрын
Makes perfect sense. The review on Furry Road (especially at the end) seemed like one big SJW commercial.
@TheDorianTube6 жыл бұрын
Ya and in the end, like always, they tend to cannibalize each other, thus the whole controversy surrounding Channel Awesome. I just hope that this experience taught him something.
@andrewvasquez65726 жыл бұрын
I love how you make fun of TMZ
@Mr_Original6 жыл бұрын
"This is rough seeing how one couple has to keep their child frozen, because he's suffering from we-need-to-keep-you-out-of-the-first-twenty-minutes...-itis." Nice. XD
@humbertojimmy7 жыл бұрын
"A love that will never die"... this is, in itself, a paradox. Love doesn't exist in a vacuum, it's a feeling that only work along with *other* feelings. It's normal (and expected) for love to die out - or even worse - when we are mistreated by the very object of our love. If this machine kid will really *always* love their parents *no matter what,* then we have a problem... Can we call "love" to a feeling that doesn't turn into hatred after abuse and neglect? No. It was never love then, it was only a "program". a copy of love but without the normal ramifications that should be expected from it. Unconditional love isn't true love... it's a weird form of brainwashing!
@JeriDro4 жыл бұрын
when I saw this around age 11, it depressed the hell out of me
@mikeman2328 жыл бұрын
Where's Elder Maxson when you need him? Anyone?
@MediaGhost_8 жыл бұрын
Shut up, Elder Maxson is a fucker
@TheHobbitFTW8 жыл бұрын
+Andrew Driscoll says the stud with the power armor profile pic
@MediaGhost_8 жыл бұрын
TheHobbitFTW why thank you...wait
@MURFGAMING12288 жыл бұрын
There's a mod out there called Odd Enemy Names. It changes Maxson's name to Self Entitled Piece of Human Garbage. I'd say it's accurate, how about you?
@MediaGhost_8 жыл бұрын
MURFGAMING1228 sounds like my ex
@JmanbeatsGamesJmanFX8 жыл бұрын
this is actually a really fucking sad movie
@jordanowen424 жыл бұрын
The film is based on Brian Aldiss' story "Supertoys Last All Summer Long." One year I met Aldiss at WorldCon and asked him what he thought of the movie. He said that as soon as Kubrick told him David was going to find the blue fairy and become a real boy he knew it was never going to work.
@craigsimpson39013 жыл бұрын
Very interesting ,I enjoyed the film as an entertainment and thought provoking on some levels ,I can't help think it was missing a couple of scenes and had some it didn't need ,overall a good film but could have been a sci fi masterpiece of the very highest order if Aldiss was on board with stanley and Spielberg helped with visuals oppose to direction ,but nether the less,it must have been great to speak to Aldiss regarding this movie ,thanks for sharing
@finding_aether7 жыл бұрын
To defend the Flesh Fair, the point about the A.I was that robots already achieved sentience before David, but humans did not realise that because they look and behaved differently. (sort of like how whites treated the other races, putting them in zoos for entertainment, etc) Thats why the crowd could hear David, who was more "human" but not hear the years of robots pleading for their lives... The last scene is also much darker, if you consider that fact David chose to destroy Monica's memories, essentially killing her, jusy to create a fake Monica for a single day. His love is not a mature love, His obsession for a perfect Mother destroyed everyone around him. The real Monica who did love him, albeit not perfectly, can now never be revived ever again, the bear is now alone, Gigolo Joe is destroyed just to rescue him and he commited suicide. In essense, like the biblical King David with his son Absalom, he loved those who hated him and hated those who loved him. I can believe Spielberg when he said the ending was Kubrick's idea.
@shadowhound51138 жыл бұрын
Does anyone else think that AI had the best ending? The whole movie humans were selfish and treated david like trash. In the end of the movie David was selfish and treated Teddy like trash. He did become a real boy. A selfish and greedy little boy.
@LuigiShroom128 жыл бұрын
Shadow Hound lol dumbass
@Gunblademan1177 жыл бұрын
Shadow Hound Oh that's a cool way to think of it
@DickDickstein7 жыл бұрын
When he finally showed human violence he was rewarded with becoming a real boy. He was rewarded for murder.
@troywright3597 жыл бұрын
Reip187 I tell you he literally would have killed to get his mother back, and he was programmed that way, to have a burning obsession that he can never ever move on from! never let go! EVER! he's the villain, unable and unwilling to ever let his mother rest.
@esyphillis1017 жыл бұрын
That’s actually a theme in the movie. The more selfish he becomes, the more he is rewarded.
@jeremynatoli40394 жыл бұрын
I actually really like how it ends. Very heartfelt and thought provoking
@deltaknight27646 жыл бұрын
18:45 If HAL had that voice, Space Odyssey would be an awesome Sci-Fi comedy.