This Guy Outplayed Me Completely

[@chess]

gotta bring that loot back at all cost

[@Tae_Eb]

hey you look familiar

[@josheco4]

hey you look very familiar

[@xtra_1807]

Lmfao who is this guy

[@prim16]

lmao

[@pietromasneri2872]

The CEO of chess itself 😱

[@woosterjeeves]

Finally, you sensibly interpreted the rules, did not rage quit, and played till the end. Bravo.....now, you are really "not a coward." 🙂

[@AutumnReel4444]

This

[@Tsunami14]

This x2

[@FireFoxie1345]

This x3

[@PeterParker-vi2nl]

This x(6-2)

[@pianoman47]

A real man knows how to lose 💪🏽

[@RGC_animation]

This guy can still be 200 rated, he blundered so many pieces.

[@randombutspecific]

People blunder that many pieces all the way until 800/900 rating. And even at 900-1400 people still blunder badly, although not as frequently. But it’s unlikely that a 200 rated player would develop his pieces the way he did in this video and set up a checkmate

[@adlet5416]

@@randombutspecific no bro 500+ player don't blunder so badly

[@jackbFPS]

@@adlet5416 yes they do XD

[@remil3777]

​@@adlet5416 500s can blunder 3 knights in their first 2 moves, you have no idea

[@Person-ef4xj]

I think the opponent might have guessed the challenge and so some of those pieces might have been sacrifices to gain tempos.

[@JannPoo]

Yeah, when you decided to take with the Bishop instead of the pawn at 3:33 I knew it was a bad decision.

[@JannPoo]

​@@DonYall Black would need to think how to deal with the Queen being attacked first.

[@Ernesto_Gehrke]

@@DonYall not at all

[@zitrusking8640]

yeah i was like why not with the pawn that was stupid

[@trevornoble337]

I thought the same thing, there was no reason to capture with the Bishop when you have to waste moves to do it

[@MaximumRabbit]

"That blunders a King."

[@smippycis6285]

Opponent wins = Dislikes = No Views only applies if you make up random extra rules that make the challenge harder than it's supposed to be. This one you played well but was just outplayed by a "246" rated player. My only note, wouldn't it have been better to take with pawn, since it doesn't force the pawn back to it's original position?

[@MrTohawk]

also it's just 22 dislikes to 1.3k likes

[@OrtegaSauce]

When a challenge is simple or the person who makes the challenge words it weirdly of course he's gonna make up rules to keep it interesting 🤦🤦

[@josephmazor725]

No that would be an illegal capture because the pawn cannot return to the starting position (without queening) thus ending the video

[@OrtegaSauce]

@@josephmazor725 pawns don't have to move back because they can't move back. He said "not pawns" like right away

[@Saint-hamudi]

But he legit did it in the beginning of the video

[@Opeoluwa_Jolaawo]

You telling me frank died in vain?

[@SonicHaXD]

I love the music cutying out and coming back XD

[@Vladdislavv1]

*CUTYING*

[@hugoarnout-mc5mm]

This music is golden wind from jojo btw watch it

[@MegaNocab]

I want to see this with both players having this rule.

[@kellamyoshikage286]

Suddenly trades go from a generally weak idea that helps your opponent develop to a terrifying idea that forces your opponent to undevelop.

[@danielhoang289]

Then Simp would lose even faster. Unless you mean the opponent is the one losing if they don't follow their end of the challenge.

[@syockit]

@@danielhoang289 What he means is for the other player to also be aware of the rule and follow it.

[@hisuianzoroark5726]

​@@syockit I.e. making the fight FAIR

[@maxkho00]

@@kellamyoshikage286 Actually, trades would be impossible. If you capture a piece, you can't have it captured back.

[@matthewcrawford133]

The challenge never said you had to rush the peice back, it just said the peice had to go back eventually

[@lxs030]

So like a normal game you mean?

[@theuseraccountname]

True.

[@ooker777]

At least it must survive to bring it back

[@asdfghyter]

@@lxs030 no, if they don’t move back before the game ends he loses. but i’d also argue that he can’t capture anything else with that piece before moving it back

[@jb17415]

@@asdfghyterthis is how I interpreted the rule too

[@mintagenart]

Man I lose it every time he goes "Aha" and "That blunders a horsie"

[@lnx0007]

i believe a proper strategy for this challenge would be focus on opening up your rook columns and bishop diagonals, so they can protect out on the board and move home in one turn if needed. then up your pawn game for capturing outside of your rook's and bishop's sight. knights are basically useless. dont focus on checkmating, just take advantage of 100 rated blunders until your opponent resigns for being low on material.

[@turt8560]

f in the chat for frank

[@stanimir5F]

f

[@tim000x3]

f

[@thepunkrocketeer1939]

I think you could have won by creatively interpreting the rules? Nothing in the rules stated you were required to bring back the piece before making any other moves. It could have been interpreted the piece had to go back to its original spot before it could capture anymore pieces.

[@mauer1]

creativly interpreting the rules the make the challenge easier is not whats this channel stands for

[@erich_ika]

Chess Simp always follows the strictest interpretation of the rules and explains why if otherwise

[@wellno7377]

That will make the challenge much easier

[@julianw7097]

Could block the Queen with the Bishop, no?

[@ahmadjauhar4562]

@@wellno7377 that's the point. Dont you guys hate when his videos ended in middle game? Not even endgame yet

[@o1ndra]

Chess but you have move your king after every move

[@Psykolord1989]

See, this is what happens when you don't pay your actors...

[@Proclifo]

It was never specified that you need to go back as fast as possible

[@hunterbuns]

The challenge didn't say you had to immediately bring the prey back to share the loot, just that you have to do that at some point. I would interpret that as "before you can take another piece (or pawn)." I'd have been disappointed if he had played Qe7 pinning the knight and you ended the video.

[@cameronschyuder9034]

If that were the case then I can totally see him starting to forget which piece captured what (as well as having to worry about timing) so doing it immediately, while crippling, made the challenge easier for him to execute

[@kodiak_fgc6736]

Most dramatic video in a while 10/10 would regurgitate prey again.

[@JJ_R]

(Opponent wins = Dislikes = No views) + Balls = Victory.

[@Person-ef4xj]

I think your opponent might have guessed the rule you were playing by and threatened checkmate knowing that the rule would stop you from defending.

[@KingDeadMan]

"Share the loot." Lmao 💀

[@ShirakamiKaiser]

Chess, but your Queen is the imposter. For every 4 moves, your queen must make the current situation WORSE, and she mustn't take any opponent pieces(and pawns).

[@pdnh8275]

I can only imagine that the queen can only make positions worse by blundering herself (and the queen dying seems like it would be against the rules) so I don't get how this is meant to be played

[@juncheok8579]

@@pdnh8275 another way would be to undefend a piece, but that's about it

[@goncalocarneiro3043]

​@@pdnh8275 I imagine that he tries to make the queen useless but not die by putting her in a corner protecting nothing and threatening nothing.

[@galvanicgem2376]

Use discord he obviously never takes from comments

[@ShirakamiKaiser]

@@pdnh8275 unnecessary retreating or other things (blocking knights might actually not be making the situation worse) a tiny list -Retreating for no reason -Un-defending -Moving to a square that threatens and defends no pieces

[@Just-Nedo]

3:36 are you serious? You could take it with Carlos and it would be much safer, but noooooooo....

[@albailey2346]

Why did he take with Frank when he could’ve avoided this by taking with the pawn?

[@pshekchik]

Yea. Literally blundering the video.

[@zlpoon858]

Take what with the pawn?

[@violetasuklevska9074]

I believe you mean Connor

[@albailey2346]

@@zlpoon858 3:34 the black pawn

[@albailey2346]

@@violetasuklevska9074 lol yeah exactly. I couldn’t remember the c pawn’s name

[@CyberBuster93]

Imagine playing what you think to be the biggest brain move you can think of and Chess Simp just says, "Nevermind." xD

[@junior523]

That's a lot of emotional damage

[@mauijttewaal]

At least you sticked to the challenge...

[@chessenceth10]

I love the surnames of the paws

[@SimpleAmadeus]

When he blundered that pawn you effectively responded by blundering your king when you took with bishop.

[@ContainerYeast]

“Just a normal game of chess” All pieces are moved into the pawn’s position and the same with the pawns.

[@RaceBandit]

Pawns have to promote before they can be moved to the elites' spawn locations.

[@rootabeta9015]

I think he cracked your pattern

[@gbcontolini]

As always, fun and knowledgeable analysis. Only ChessTuber I consistently watch.

[@madisonking8057]

Honestly I feel like he just didn't strategize very well for this challenge

[@prim16]

I think you underestimate how much we enjoy seeing you get checkmated

[@theolefebure1698]

2:36 Bb5 would have ended the video in a fashion way

[@helterskelter9670]

I really love that they analize their KZbin channel's performance in the same way they analize chess games. Know I'm thinking that this also applies for anything in their life and it's really cool.

[@MurunGD]

Well the challenge didn't specify you need to bring back your piece immediately. You could've stopped the checkmate first then drop your bishop back.

[@SolathPrime]

Mission failed successfully

[@metaltom2003]

It looked like the opponent caught on by the end and that's why he played what he did. Definitely not a 200

[@choi-r7108]

That silence period was horror

[@LEGOALEX97]

When the paid actor decides he doesn't want to throw the match

[@Jazzatic2011]

I just realized he names the pieces based on the letter square they originally start at.

[@DankAudioStash24]

Chess but every 2nd move is completely random.

[@Shcroft2]

"A very weird Sicilian" = Fool's mate

[@WomanSlayer69420]

You could’ve just taken with the pawn.

[@pablo89212009]

I mean, it said bring the piece back, not bring it back immediately

[@NguyenTran-eq2wg]

We found an imposter lol

[@CHOCOLATIONZ]

I feel sorry for David, Edward and Frank

[@thiagoXXXmarinho]

you could have protected frank bishop on your way back with your horsie

[@irjake]

Chess, but you can only move your queen side.

[@SeanBask]

You said "not pawn" so you didn't have to move your bishop back to start after turn 19

[@inciaradible7144]

At least you were not a coward. Maybe the challenge should be changed to that you can't capture again until you return that piece to its original square.'

[@Mati-zc2ym]

but the challenge does not say you need to bring it back right away

[@half-qilin]

The rules never said you had to pull the piece back immediately, just that you had to eventually

[@thunder_blonde]

Chess, but it’s Keplerian: before you can win, your Queen has to do a full round trip around your opponent’s Queen.

[@CollinGerberding]

I actually enjoy seeing a loss after a good battle. It's a worthwhile experience.

[@Penguin4096-si9fz]

As a Penguin, I confirm that this is what I do (not really)

[@william14able]

Welcome to the fucking 200’s. I get mated like that all the damn time.

[@nogoat23]

Honestly you did better than I thought.

[@BoicuBuduAndrei]

He is a sandbagger i think

[@arandombard1197]

The rules never said you had to win. You followed the rules so the challenge is a succss.

[@aerith4697]

All bark no bite, where your pieces must only threaten other pieces, if you must kill a piece, then your pieces become bloodthirsty and their only moves must be a killing move

[@add9audio355]

honestly Rh4 is exactly the kind of move I would expect from a 200. See a mate threat, play a mate threat regardless of how easy it is to counter

[@nissansucc5486]

Chess but you can only move each piece or pawn 4 times

[@jdorritie]

I admire this guy taking these impossible tasks

[@owenbrowne9288]

Idea: chess but you have to force a draw by repetition down at least a full piece

[@reed6514]

Could have gone for checkmate with minimal takes & basically avoided the whole challenge

[@OhioStudiosOG]

RIP Dave, Edward and Frank

[@liliya_aseeva]

Seeing an open enemy queen was such a pain ;__;

[@nissansucc5486]

Chess but you have to swap between only moving pieces to light squares and only moving to dark squares every 5 moves

[@CyrogenicNation]

1:28 what was wrong with moving his knight to d2 to protect Frank for at least one more turn?

[@spikypichu]

exactly what I was thinking

[@justinbombach9873]

I thought the same thing, but maybe he thought the rules meant to basically undo the last two moves? So he had to go back the way he came, meaning he must move to c3 then b1. EDIT: I guess not, he didn't do this the rest of the video. Maybe he just didn't notice? Idk

[@andrerodrigues2877]

because bishop wasnt protected anyway , the knight had to go back

[@CyrogenicNation]

@@andrerodrigues2877 true, but the paid actor didn't know that. he probably could've seen that bishop was defended and did something else

[@justinbombach9873]

@@CyrogenicNation UNPAID actor

[@donnythedingo]

No "WTF-" today

[@chiepah2]

I was thinking you just wouldn't be able to take anything until you brought the loot back, I didn't think bringing the loot back directly was forced.

[@sapphyte6093]

You may have lost the battle, but you gained a lot of loot! 👍

[@edwardmiao4423]

You should really have taken the piece with the paw instead of the bishop

[@zaqwsx7600]

It wasn't said you have to bring back pieces immediatelly. You could do that a few moves later but make sure it won't die

[@Necroxion]

3:33 had me screaming to take with Pawn and not Bishop asdfghjkl

[@evanhackard5861]

when simp blunders a knight by taking with bishop and not pawn

[@dalton642]

I’d like to see it where it’s the same rules BUT the piece doesn’t have to go back immediately, it just has to go back before it can capture again and if dies before making it back, video over.

[@tesseract7586]

chess but you can only capture with pawns (not pieces)

[@archidor1944]

i was under the assumption that if you took a pawn with a piece you didn't need to return it's hard interpreting some of these rules depending on word order, interesting.

[@chessandmathguy]

3:35 just take on d4 with a pawn. Don't commit the bishop to retreating to c1.

[@drippymissouri]

When he says pawn it kinda sounds like p*rn

[@sUpErBaNaNa12]

I just realized that David was the D pawn, Edward was the E pawn, and Frank is the F bishop

[@zacharywoolstenhulme5614]

I also call the king’s bishop Frank

[@Okaz_]

Nooo David :( He was a good one

[@rcslyman8929]

I've come to expect many different variations of themes in these challenges. "But you are a penguin" was not one of those...

[@NICOCLASH]

Those damn paid actors that are not paid enough to do their jobs

[@pacolibre5411]

I mean, Martin is 250, and he never misses mate in 1.

[@iwersonsch5131]

Not retreating with Nd2 for the intimidation looked a bit fishy

[@holycannol6451]

"it's pretty obvious that he's gonna go kxq4h5urkk3o2k4k6kn3b3gj44jk to get my king"

[@i_Soar]

Didn't he take a pawn at the end and therefore the challenge rules do not apply?

[@zakarikante9674]

no, the challenge doesnt apply only if its a pawn capturing. If he captures a pawn he still has to go back (although he could have taken with his pawn instead of his bishop)

[@mr.d8747]

*At **1:29**, why didn't he go knight d2, protecting the bishop and getting closer to home?*

[@MissesWitch]

Loot is super important, This is how I used to imagine and play the game as a kid!

[@gamefacierglitches]

Challenge: "Bring the piece back." Simp: "Immediately, right?" Challenge: "..." Simp: "R-right?"

[@teambellavsteamalice]

I think in this challenge you'd have to ignore simple piece gains and try to just go for mate asap. And try to get as many trades as possible where you take back with a pawn. That saves a lot of moves.

[@carealoo744]

You could just not capture at all with pawns to maintain the challenge's rules.

[@phillipotey9736]

I like this, but moving it back eventually would also be cool

[@darkken6732]

100 rated chess but there should be a possible move every two moves that can put your king in check.

[@KawaiiBabyTragon]

But why, pawns don't count.

[@tiagodagostini]

There is a reason there is no Penguin GM and now we know why