China's aircraft carriers: the path to Supremacy

[@Steve-pq7cb]

China's Jiangnan shipyard has more capacity than the entire US ship building capacity.

[@TheLAGopher]

Capacity to build junk.

[@jacobrocks7]

Don’t forget that thousands of years ago, China had the largest fleet in the world and still didn’t colonize other countries or seek war unlike the American empire (failing)

[@ledzik1893]

@@jacobrocks7 more like 500 years ago 😅

[@PlanetCHINA.1]

​@@ledzik1893another jealous troll.. Sick troll

[@RobertMarshall-d2n]

I guess you have not been paying attention to china's criminal actions in the waters around other countries. the chinese carrier doesn't have the support fleet it needs to be a true blue water navy. most of their fleet are small ships not capable of getting far from their own shores. the carriers china has launched so far has proven to be problematic so you won't be seeing it sailing around the world any time soon.

[@soshelp4085]

​@@ledzik1893 its back from few thousand years to recent few hundred years that China had the largest fleet in the world.

[@unbreakable7633]

That's not the Chinese history I know. And China is failing and will fall faster than the US. What China did centuries ago has nothing to do with what China is doing now. Ask the countries that surround it.

[@antonmihoc4109]

You go China. I only hope you do not become like the USA when you get to the top.

[@TomDrez]

America was brutal to everybody long before an empire could even arise, china do have tense relations with it's neighbor but they have built themselves an interest and amazing diplomatic ties that they know are fragile like all balanced things, they'll keep on developing the world and themselves because they know that what benefit them the most. At least that's what i see when i observe their actions.

[@antonmihoc4109]

@@TomDrez You are so right.

[@6565hopepy]

American 🇺🇸 big bully

[@michaelg4158]

@@TomDrez America learned to be brutal because 200 years ago the British would not let them to secede and break away from the British colonial empire so they fought a brutal war against their colonial master. To this date the British are still salty about it haha.

[@TomDrez]

@@michaelg4158 As a french i have somewhat of an already natural aversion toward the british so you're fueling the fire by saying that to me.

[@SoulRocketMan]

China has every right to develop and produce weapons to protect their people and land. They have suffered alot in the past from UK and Japan. I am not Chinese but I am mad at Japan for what they did in Nanking Massacre and they still don't really own it and apologize to China. And I am sure China is spending big on its military only for defensive and not offensive like the USA.

[@qtdcanada]

Tell this to the Tibetans, Uyghurs, Filipinos, Vietnamese, etc. about China's 'defensive' moves. Just a question for your feeble mind: why is it that China today has more disputes territorially with its neighbors than any other country?

[@ToughGuy-x9q]

I see China’s territorial disputes today as deeply connected to our long history of wars and conflicts, from colonial invasions to the civil war. These struggles left behind unclear borders and competing claims with neighboring countries. With 14 land borders and a strong emphasis on sovereignty, we’re focused on reclaiming what we see as lost territories, which also drives our interest in resource-rich areas like the South China Sea. Taiwan adds another layer of complexity, operating as a separate government despite being a breakaway province. It’s also worth noting that when the Republic of China originally made these claims, there was little international pushback. As the ROC’s successor, the People’s Republic of China every right to inherit these claims So that’s the answer for your feeble mind @qtcanada

[@luckyloonies4378]

​@qtdcanada Have you ever tried to figure out what the map of the Chinese Empire used to be during the 1800s? Based on what you have come up with. You are a very ignorant person, you know nothing about the Chinese history.

[@davidgao7048]

@@qtdcanada with India. Who else?

[@yukunlei8908]

@@qtdcanada 西藏和新疆是中国的领土！

[@saitmardin3332]

China's development is amazing, hard to comprehend. Last 4 decades, China did the incredible. Looking forward to the next 4 decades.

[@galactuscausandoimpactus9521]

1 estaleiro da China é maior do que os 4 estaleiros que fabricam porta-aviões nos Estados Unidos 😂😂😂

[@youchwb6005]

Because China is not as resourceful as the US. You have manufacturing companies across the US making all different parts of the ship, then they transport them to that ship yard for assembly. This also applies to other defence contracting for the other armed forces. China makes them mostly in the one area which security wise, is not the best idea. Mark my words, the Americans know much better than the Chinese, or anyone else about building these goliaths.

[@linkdiablo4476]

@@youchwb6005 not like that, actually china military ship has been make by many shipyard, not only 1 shipyard. but yes at the moment US manufacture for ship is decline with only 1/250 of china ship manufacture

[@horridohobbies]

A leaked US Navy briefing says that China's shipbuilding capacity is 232 times that of the USA. In fact, the USA has practically no shipbuilding industry anymore, a far cry from 60 years ago.

[@kevinloh-c5k]

@@youchwb6005 😂😂😂

[@justeunfan3364]

Thats scary how in 10 years they went from 0 to what looks like state of the art aircraft carriers. The USA only built 2 AC since 2009, its the trend to trash on the Chinese but they seem to have caught up on every scientific, industrial and engineering aspects, and now they are blasting full speed forward while we are almost regressing on some aspects. Never underestimate a potential ennemy with 1.5 billions educated citizens in a developped country, and a crazy work culture and discipline. The day it will become absolutly undiscutable the chinese are ahead it will be waaay to late.

[@rykehuss3435]

We have no idea whats the condition of their naval vessels. Especially for the carriers, they could be floating Potemkin villages

[@justeunfan3364]

@@rykehuss3435 We know that they do float, they do allow aircrafts to take off and land. Thats already already an important part of an aircraft carrier. Underestimating an ennemy is great for propaganda but when you base your military strategy on it it rarely ends well. If they do suck, well its great, if they don't we are in great trouble.

[@rykehuss3435]

@@justeunfan3364 The carrier is only as good as its weakest link. How are the other vessels? range, operational capabilities? a lone carrier cant do much. And of course a carrier is as strong as the birds aboard, how good are they? I'll bet barely even 4th gen level like a Hornet. F-35 would absolutely smoke them without issues

[@mahzorimipod]

@@rykehuss3435 white cope

[@justeunfan3364]

@@rykehuss3435 The USA said the same of the russian army 3 years ago. "The war will end in 2 weeks", "Russia has only 5 soldiers with soviet AK", "The Abrams tank will crush their defensive lines in hours". Yet its been 3 years Russia control half of Ukraine. China does have carrier groups, they have the engineers, they have had the industrial experience for decades now. The usa was not a major power in the 1920's, in the 1950's they were the absolute leaders. It does not take much time for a country with so much money and a determined leadership to rise. You can keep a single f-35 and try to convince yourself it will be enought, I prefer having 5000 of them and strong diplomatic communication with them, just in case.

[@Capitano599]

That story about HMAS Melbourne was interesting and amusing

[@yttean98]

Your videos contain much useful info. Just concentrate on providing viewers with accurate info.

[@howlutos]

China's civilian shipbuilding share accounts for nearly 70% of the world, China's military power relies on its strong manufacturing industry. China's shipyards are both military and civilian. So this is also the reason why India’s military power is not good. India’s civilian shipbuilding share is less than 1% of the world. Although India’s military power looks strong, India’s military equipment depends on foreign countries. There is no strong military power without a strong manufacturing industry. If Japan were not restricted by the United States, Japan's military power would be far stronger than India's，Because Japan's manufacturing industry is far stronger than India's

[@howlutos]

Of the 11 aircraft carriers in the United States, 9 are lying in shipyards for long-term maintenance. Essentially, the civilian shipbuilding industry in the United States is failing and the United States lacks skilled shipbuilding workers.

[@tanvirsikder2801]

Kudos to china for their success.❤

[@williambenedictalava2634]

PLAN can manufacture ships and repair them unlike US of A.

[@timothychung4811]

Wasn't there a vlog about the 4th and 5th built simultaneously?

[@james_l4337]

Yes Propaganda online mess up masses brain Carrier 004 #19 is sister to carrier 003 #18 Fujian conventional powered longer nose slightly larger only, 3x plane lifts Carrier 005 #20 is nuclear-powered using Thorium No longer Uranium!

[@elmouto3883]

003 is complete so it means 004 is building, 005 is entering design construction phase and 006 project has started.

[@james_l4337]

Yes both are underconstruction 004 likely mpre then half complete

[@james_l4337]

005 nuclear-power generators likely underconstruction Gossip about that large component part of a 100k tons is Photographed but none is published out here & if that's yrue it will be 005 100k tons Likelihood of this is low IMHO If it's true then China have accelerated 005 construction

[@james_l4337]

006 certainly will not be build yet because 005 nuclear-power certainly need a lot of time to verify It's China 1st time Thorium nuclear-power aircraft carrier so certainly won't jump to 006 Longer period of 005 certification before 006 will start

[@MrBassbump]

I was ignorant of the power Chinese people have built. I’m an American think it’s interesting to see how other countries have developed their own infrastructure and military. I’d like to see the final product of them all.

[@ledzik1893]

Well usa had gone from barly a navy to second biggest navy in around 20 years. Now china had done exactly the same thing

[@marcosburgos8415]

Honestly id just go tl sinldefenceforum if ur into that kinda stuff. Its where all the analysts and PLA watchers gather

[@TomDrez]

@@ledzik1893 But with modern software and not just iron plate

[@MrBassbump]

@@ledzik1893 the Chinese have the most submarines, but with the current US navy sonar we can detect them from anywhere.

[@horridohobbies]

@@MrBassbump Not so. China's submarine technology has evolved greatly. Their latest subs are very stealthy.

[@devhunter1702]

let them build all they want. Just be advised, things get aggressive and they would be setting at the bottom of the ocean. Simple fact, all ready proven.

[@Flightman453]

Cope

[@VictorThang-b5p]

Very beautiful ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

[@henryloh4346]

US and EU Chinese peoples are not stupid 😅

[@james_l4337]

Carrier 004 #19 is sister ship to Fujian carrier 003 #18 Carrier 004 #19 is conventional-power slightly larger 80+ tons 3 plane lifts instead of 2x as in carrier 003 #18 Fujian Nuclear-power carrier only starts at 5th carrier Carrier 005 #20 onwards will be nuclear-powered Thorium nuclear-powered Not using Uranium

[@Raytracer96024]

Its over for the West

[@sitoudien9816]

LiaoNing should sail to Russia and reunite with sister ship Admiral Kuznetsov. Russian navy would freak out.

[@vincentrivera743]

These Chinese carriers are very impressive. Using dependable Chinese steel and high technology computer chips, the carriers are high performance machines able to navigate from one pier to the next using latest gps systems. It is expected that Chinese sensors and radars on these ships are so sensitive that it can detect stealth aircraft from a distance giving the ships time to prepare for a good defense. Stealth aircraft like the J31/35 may not be able to sneak in so easily and surprise the ships. Congratulations to the builders of these magnificent ships - they are awesome!!! But to be on the safe side, do not run the ship beyond 15 knots, going faster might break a precious gear unnecessarily though wear and tear are a certainty.

[@ViceCoin]

Obsolete in missile age.

[@umamigo1]

WW3 Unfolding

[@Mike7734-r2g]

Whatever, none of their hardware is worth a shit.

[@HappyPandaBear73]

🇨🇳🙏🕊️☮️✌🏻🙂❗️

[@supa3ek]

This channel has NO sources of his assumptions !!!! Misinformation is terrible here !!!

[@martinaalbinda7609]

Made in china

[@youchwb6005]

By the Sum Ting Wong mfg company.

[@WChocoleta]

Yes, proudly. What is the problem there?

[@justeunfan3364]

@@WChocoleta Murican propaganda is trying hard to trash on the chinese, they can't compete with its industry, science or engineering capability, so they spam the "china sucks" message as hard as they can. They do have aircraft carriers doing everything aircraft carriers have to do, and with the exact same tecnologies as in the US ones, but its Chinese so it must suck somehow. Quite pathetic coping.

[@amunra5330]

@@WChocoleta She is Filipina lol They like to follow their US masters.

[@uncleb3008]

🐒🐒🐒🐒🐒🐒🍌

[@George_Costanza]

awwwww so cute........ one whole non working aircraft carrier

[@georgedeng8646]

awwwww so cute...... one whole bitter barking pup

[@youchwb6005]

Didn't come with batteries.

[@WraySatchel]

😂😂😂

[@kanding3369]

awwwww so cute........ driving around in ships your grandpa built and feel so proud😂

[@Vhvjdow0ajsbcdhcuei3o22-om4sm]

You got nothing to worry about then, right? So is china a threat or are they weak? Which is it?

[@frankgaleon5124]

What about quality of this carriers? I think it’s far from the US ships

[@justeunfan3364]

The chinese are known for the quality of their ships. They produce more ships than all other nations combined. The idea that China only produces cheap things comes from the mass plastic trash stuff they throw by thousands in other countries, but they also perfectly know how to make very hight quality stuff. They have a functionning space station, insane infrastructure, and a mass of scientist and engineers. I'm sure most of the "quality" stuff you have, from non Chinese brands, is still at least in part designed and build there. The USA can't accept they are loosing the race, but they just can't compete with a country 6 time as populated which design and produces everything they use themselves. The US army have been plagued with issues, low disponility, and their ship quality is nothing special. The freedom class LCS have lots of structural issues, their last nuclear subs had defective welds... They are not a major heavy ship nation. Even when looking at their aircraft or car industry the USA is clearly not an exemple of a nation producing qualitative stuff.

[@UnbeltedSundew]

@@justeunfan3364 No. The perception that China produces low quality everything is because they do. From tofu dreg construction, to toys, to anything else. The reasons why are clear, because the Chinese cut corners, they have corruption infesting every level of government and business, they don't care about reputation, law, or most importantly peoples lives.

[@mahzorimipod]

extreme levels of white cope

[@youchwb6005]

@@justeunfan3364 🤣🤣🤣

[@youchwb6005]

Should call their ships "the rolling stones".

[@kaizokanuma8472]

「兵不血刃」　荀子を習近平氏は尊敬しているという。この姿勢を中国は維持するのを希望する。

[@UnbeltedSundew]

Even tofu dreg built military is dangerous in large enough numbers.

[@mahzorimipod]

american cheese curd military

[@taiwanstillisntacountry]

🏳️1962🏳️

[@yukunlei8908]

福特号电磁弹射的故障至今没有解决，肯尼迪号下水5年还没海试而且只装好了两条弹射器🤣

[@taiwanstillisntacountry]

@@UnbeltedSundew meanwhile in little-D-boi's country infrastructures keeps collapsing and it is ranked 111th on the hunger-index. Jai be-Hind.

[@jennylee685]

Don’t forget throughout history, it is the immigrants who have helped US innovations, many even came from China as well as immigrants from other countries.

[@Naval-Gazing]

Meanwhile, their Tofu-dreg economy is tanking.

[@rs5974]

our econemy is better then the american dept econemy

[@Naval-Gazing]

@@rs5974 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@hellothere1656]

Western media keeps saying Chinese economy is tanking then acts all surprised when it doubles in size after a few years 😂😂

[@andrean2247]

While US do boeing economy 😂

[@tangbesitangbesi7009]

You're soo mistaken because the World can see it's American mentality that's tanking

[@300guy]

China can build all the carriers they like, but until they have the experience to make use of them (USN has had 100 years to develop the carrier tactical doctrine for example). This isn't something China can cut n paste like their KJ-600, J-35, or literally just straight up steal like the J-15. There's going to be a lot if stumbling, a lot of false starts before China has a workable, scalable carrier doctrine.

[@stug77]

Ha ha! First!

[@tonysu8860]

These PLAN carriers are mostly for show. Poor trained, poorly designed and poorly managed, all China has shown is its ability to build vessels and not very well at that based on foreign analysis of available sea trials data. Maybe the Type 004 will be closer to actual functionality and nore rhan a floating barge but that is at keast a decade un the future and vy then these first xarriers nught not even be sea worthy

[@lagrangewei]

considering the Liaoning made 140 sortie in 1 patrol as recorded by the Japanese, it is already far superior to the sortie rate of British and French carriers.

[@taiwanstillisntacountry]

Tell us about the 2 2nd-hand carriers of little-D-boi's country

[@horridohobbies]

Your wishful thinking. Nothing you've said can be factually supported.

[@kylinlinux7742]

@@lagrangewei Why do you debate with stupid ?

[@kylinlinux7742]

@@horridohobbies Why do you debate with stupid? Tony has special needs or has the mind power of a 5-year-old.

[@Khan_is_mongol]

So basically the Asians did not have the know and mind to invent aircraft carrier themselves, they copied the europeans?? what happened to China inventing ships? and where did the Europeans copy? they did not they used their own mind to design and innovate.