China's J-35 Stealth Fighter Takes Off From Aircraft Carrier

[@luisabarca7363]

This is a normal military development for a big country, a superpower that right now, is more powerful economically, than the other superpower, the USA... Washington shouldn´t be panicking... This is normal... But, the U.S.A. is scared because its bad conscience...

[@seawater1322]

Exactly!

[@tylerdurden4006]

Lol, you do know the UK carrier crashed an f 35 and hasn't had any since then right? No? Hilarious 😂

[@Joshua-dt5vi]

Why would the US be scared if they have a better Fighter? China should focus on preventing its submerines from sinking.

[@shanerooney7288]

The West is worried that China will do to them what they did to China.

[@gups4963]

Might have more to do with China claiming waters clearly not theirs and getting violent with those countries

[@MeditationNow123]

The aircraft carriers of mainland China are named after coastal provinces. There are 14 provincial-level administrative regions along China's coast, and currently, China has 3 aircraft carriers (Liaoning, Shandong, Fujian) and 2 amphibious assault ships (Hainan, Guangxi), meaning China is still lacking 9 vessels of aircraft carrier level. The people of various provinces are competing for priority naming rights. There's no need for anyone to be anxious; China is simply returning to its long-held historical status. The United States and its allies also need not be anxious, as worrying will not help.😂😂😂

[@seansixsixsix]

note that 075 took Hainan and Guangxi.

[@scc1349]

Worrying will lower your life expectancy.

[@MeditationNow123]

@@seansixsixsix Ah, you are right! Looking forward to the under-construction 076, which is said to possibly be a drone aircraft carrier.

[@Restless-qi1im]

My assumption for the new names for future carriers the Guangdong, Zhejiang, Jiangsu and the Heibei. lol❤😊

[@kibakobo]

With All due respect and love for China. We first need to have HK and Macao back !!! I always thought one nation two system means HK has own governance, but reality is somewhat perplexing to me who is Hard Core Admirer of Han Civilization. Or Mainland. This Olympic was a sobering event. We don’t even have One FLAG. One CURRENCY. One Border. One Custom. Lol!!! It’s none of my business but quite perplexing when we ask and demand respect of Sovereignty. I mean China and HK trade like two Sovereign Independent Nations. 😂😂😂 What kind of joke, irony, or dichotomy is that. They Even have their own MONETARY AGENCY aka INDEPENDENT CENTRAL BANK. Shocking Revelation. Also, on the contrary, what else HK need ! 😂😂😂 Such ungrateful spoiled brats they are. There is nothing, not a single element, that doesn’t make them a separate nation. They Even Have their OWN HK PASSPORT. Lol!!!! 😂😂😂

[@rogerlenton3335]

Well done on a fairly balanced report. Yes, it will be years before we know how good the J-31/J-35 is, but it is impressive to see how quickly the Chinese have developed the carrier version.

[@jasonpmorganstein2480]

They are still 20 years behind the United States of America and Russia is 50 years behind the United States of America when it comes to military Might! This is a fact go look it up then talk to US! China is definitely afraid of USA when and if it does happen you will see how fast the USA makes decisive GPS strikes and strategical upon China with other NATO involvement they will shit their pants ! And will wanna go home!

[@RectalRooter]

@@jasonpmorganstein2480 You speak bullshit. The US would invade Taiwan if it was not afraid of china !! The US attacks unarmed Philippian fishing and supply boats because the US is afraid of china !!

[@Lightning-lr4bz]

@@jasonpmorganstein2480 thats why China built its own beidou system. China aint Iraq, its 2024 not 1991

[@andrewlim7751]

The CCP track record, speed and efficiency is on another level, their only short comings is propaganda or marketing.

[@RectalRooter]

@@andrewlim7751 pointing finger hahahahaha

[@phils4634]

I wonder how rapidly the PLA Navy can build up numbers of this aircraft? China has a significant aircraft construction capability, and it would be reasonable to expect a significant number of airframes constructed annually. Mind you the J-15 is not an inferior aircraft, and is a very reliable (and probably cheaper) aircraft to build.

[@fatdoi003]

5 per month is a good number to start with.... maybe ramp to a 10 a month plus the J31 version as well.... maybe then they'll reduce the J11 production

[@shenzhong2942]

I expect production run will be similar to Su 57. It will be slow and methodical

[@chrisdoulou8149]

@@shenzhong2942that’s not how the Chinese do things. They build slow when it comes to prototypes, but when they are happy with the design they go into sausage mode and just print the fuckers.

[@sovietbanana4589]

@@shenzhong2942eh. China doesn’t suffer from the same geopolitical and economic restrictions Russia has that’s slowing production. I mean they did pump out a hell of a lot of j-20’s.

[@james_l4337]

Depends on single crystal blade manufacture without issue The engines

[@lagrangewei]

not all version of F35 has gun. so i don't see why J35 having a gun would mean other version and J20 may have gun... that's too big an assumption given how mix the adoption of gun in stealth fighter is in other country, I am sure designer in China has the same mix opinion and may likely adopt different position on gun as well.

[@十四弟少侠]

Because J20 and J35 are products of two different companies

[@fatdoi003]

@@十四弟少侠 ultimately it's the customer (PLAAF) to decide if they want one or not

[@十四弟少侠]

@@fatdoi003 Maybe J20's mission doesn't require dog fights, right

[@fatdoi003]

@@十四弟少侠 i see J20 as long range interceptor..... fire the internal missiles, turn back, super cruise RTB....

[@ningwsh159]

Because the J35 does not need a machine gun, the radar and missiles are advanced, and over-the-horizon strikes do not require close combat

[@honfmeilingfleet957]

as Modern Warships player i can say J-35 is could be deadly with laser guide Missiles

[@RectalRooter]

Whaaaaaaaaat ?

[@gelinrefira]

I think the best decision is to not make a STOVL version for amphibious assault ships. A naval and airforce version have far easier time for commonality manufacturing since their requirements are quite similar, than to have to accomodate an STOVL version like the F-35.

[@tvgerbil1984]

The PLA Navy Marine Corps does not have its own fixed wing aircraft and relies entirely on the PLAN to provide fixed wing aircraft support. It would make no sense to build a STOVL version of J-35. By contrast, the US Marine Corps has very different operational requirements and bought over 350 F-35B alone, making the USMC the third largest user of F-35 in the world. It would make sense to build a STOVL version of the F-35.

[@gelinrefira]

@@tvgerbil1984 and that's a mistake. They could have just gone with a smaller catapult carrier

[@tvgerbil1984]

@@gelinrefira Besides operating from amphibious assault carriers, the USMC requires fixed wing aircrafts operating from quickly prepared forward land bases with very short runways without tying down any of the Navy's big fleet carriers. This mode of operations makes STOVL aircrafts like the AV-8B Harrier II and the F-35B indispensable. The PLAN Marine Corps perhaps doesn't operate that way at all.

[@gelinrefira]

@@tvgerbil1984 Well, given that China is not an imperialist country that has no desire to set up bases in places where good runways or forward bases for invasions of other countries rampantly are rare, the PLA Marine corps don't have to operate like invaders.

[@Karthagast]

*V/STOL (Vertical/Short Take Off and Landing)

[@Wvk5zc]

Can't wait for Zhuhai airshow this coming November! Also what do you think of yesterday news about the sunken "Zhou" class submarine? Lots of peculiar aspects that don't really add up eg. Did they really build sub at Wuhan (inland)?? Zhou class sub was never heard of before?? From satellite photp, it looks more like the shadow of the cranes instead, etc

[@lagrangewei]

Wuchang only build diesel sub, only Huludao and Shanghai has the ability to handle nuclear submarines. furthermore there is no "Zhou" designation in NATO. it is likely a misidentification by an Amateur in DOD who is unaware of the export model China is building in those shipyard and just assume a different sub must be a new chinese sub.

[@HAWAII358]

WS never built nuclear subs before and it is thousand kms away from the ocean, why China build nuclear subs there?

[@HAWAII358]

Trust yourself more than those experts. They are not smarter than you and you do not have an agenda. 😊

[@james_l4337]

Inland China river & Middle of China... If its a large sub, it can't move or run like ocean if at all If it is a nuclear submarine just take it back up There's no pressure test in a shallow river If it was in ocean then extreme water pressure causing submarine outside to crack (as deviants says made in China) & sunk That's a worry Doesn't make much of worry in shallow water

[@knighai4170]

@@lagrangewei Nuclear submarines can only be built in deep sea areas. This picture shows a Yangtze River. The Yangtze River cannot accommodate nuclear submarines, and the Yangtze River cannot reach the sea. This news is fabricated news, because it is common sense that the river cannot accommodate nuclear submarines. You can see it clearly by comparing the size of the submarine in the picture with the size of the nuclear submarine. So this is China's new unmanned small submarine being launched for testing

[@gaobili]

It's not necessarily the J-35 that completes the Liaoning's maiden flight, it could be the J-15B as well.

[@benibky6281]

wow... China is amazing, keep moving forward and always be successful jiaaayoooo.....👍👍👍👏

[@RectalRooter]

This is no big deal. china will just shoot down their own aircraft. china cannot build a working radar -- fujian sea trials could not identify a circling aircraft -- Not even tell if it was friend or foe.

[@Lightning-lr4bz]

@@RectalRooter uh... according to who? your imagination?

[@kinwaisiu9414]

@@Lightning-lr4bz According to world, including people like you🤭

[@Lightning-lr4bz]

@@kinwaisiu9414 The world: US & puppets

[@kinwaisiu9414]

@@Lightning-lr4bz A-man-with-cunts?🤭

[@月隐谷]

With regard to the incident of the United States smearing the sinking of China's new nuclear submarine, there is a saying in China: Rumors stop at the wise.

[@RectalRooter]

Then china will never stop ???

[@CJJerr]

@@RectalRooter 5000年都停不下来，你是个什么东西就想让中国停止？你也配？就凭你？🤣不服就开战

[@kumbackquatsta]

the cannon is great for popping air and sea surface drones too, i presume

[@waverider227]

Nice presentation but where is the footage of it "actually on the carrier deck" taking off or landing??

[@davidk6269]

Thank you for another timely and important update!

[@shawnc5188]

Do you have any recent news about the JL-10 mockup that was seen on the Type-003 Fujian’s deck. I have always thought that the PLAN will be a true carrier force when they are able to deck qualify nuggets in trainers.

[@jasonshenton7680]

Is it just me or is there rather a lot of water being pumped out?

[@kibakobo]

Thank you man ! On question of comparison with LIGHTNING II. The mere fact alone that J-35 is twin engined aircraft with lesser combined thrust than Lightning make things interesting. (I had an impression that it’s other way around.)

[@gelinrefira]

We don't really know what WS-19's performance really is, but I doubt its combined thrust will be lower than the F135.

[@Mr.mysterious76]

The f35 engine is massive

[@kibakobo]

@@Mr.mysterious76 Yes ! Just discovered. Always thought it’s other way around.

[@kibakobo]

@@Mr.mysterious76 Still lot of catching up to do … Hope their avionics component aren’t made in Taiwan.

[@农夫山贼有点田]

@@gelinrefira F135的推力很大，但发动机本身重量也高，导致它的推重比并不算有多优秀，在加上复杂的设计，飞机超重了，f35它的机动性远远比不上f22，所以有“肥猪”的外号，别指望这架飞机在近距离格斗中有优秀。f35最优秀的部分在于先进的电子设备，势态感知能力强，可以远距离杀伤对手。不过，随着近年来中国在电子科技取得的突破，美国的优势并不明显，这就是美国人越来越焦急的原因。

[@Nero-Caesar]

Been waiting for this one thanks for the report

[@arfajob4246]

Gosh! Where did it land?

[@LIONIQ-foxhound]

Huge forward leap for the PLA Naval Forces, although operating two platforms side by side will place pressure on the logistic and technical maintenance arms of the PLA Naval Forces, but this is a standard practice for the navy force of what is very temporarily called the united states of america which is the rival force for China, and for Chinese PLA they needs to benefits from the advantages of operating a conventional designed fighter aircraft's alongside the stealthy designed fighter aircraft's, this will ease the operational burden on the stealth platforms and place the main effort on conventionally designed fighter aircraft which cheaper to operate and easier to maintain, beside it have the combat range and payload to conduct a wide spectrum of combat and combat support missions and duties, whether shoulder-to-shoulder in support to the FC35 or separately and independently... LONG LIVE CHINA LONG LIVE PLA...

[@teriyakibo2396]

It is not relevant to compare the J20 to the F35? F35 is an multi role fighter which should be compared to the Shenyang J31. Just a reminder the F22 has been developed in 1988 and was combat ready in 2005 which is almost 20 years ago. Also the technology has improved a lot since two decades.

[@bobwang9688]

It's regressive, in fact.

[@dynastywarriorlord07]

I was actually expecting you to make another video regarding the Chinese submarines that sunk while in the dock(not sure how that works) but I guess more info on the J35 is also good

[@李哲-b5i]

谣言止于智者，武汉位于中国腹地，会有大型潜艇存在与中国内地吗？

[@RectalRooter]

@@李哲-b5i So your saying china will never stop ?

[@Lightning-lr4bz]

@@RectalRooter it translates to "rumors stop at the wise" I dunno how you interpreted it into China will never stop

[@RectalRooter]

@@Lightning-lr4bz It translates. Wise people stop. china does not stop because it is not Wise.

[@damjanforjanic]

It has really nice lines, they have improved a lot in 10 years, we will not be even close to them.

[@RichardsMiscCorner]

I wonder if they'll push the non-naval version (J31) for the PLAAF now that the naval version is out - it would make a lot of sense to standardize on one airframe. that being said, being able to use it on all three carriers is a good thing for navy pilots.

[@jmoresnr007]

I did not find J-35 exciting. My bet is it could be a hype. Another assumption I used to have was J-35 naval version was battle ready. I am now learning that it is a prototype.

[@andrewlim7751]

PLA has not made it official yet.

[@zomgneedaname]

It really does look like the f35, you have to admit

[@ShahjahanMasood]

No

[@goodluck-mo8dr]

机身布局都不一样，哪里像？都有两个翅膀嘛？😂😂😂

[@gelinrefira]

Somehow I heard "eternal weapons bay" and thought that will be cool if it can shoot off missiles like in Ace Combat.

[@romansallai8223]

What happened to the wheels at 1:44 ? 🙂

[@hansudowolfrahm4856]

General Kenobi! 0:00

[@naga2015kk]

its so amazing that India has aircraft carrier BUT it has no planes..... All the pic and video shows an empty deck. Its the ONLY carrier in the world that has empty deck.

[@jagodiving]

am trying collect some indicator why an aircraft being named 5th generation 1. closed weapon bay 2. supercruise 3. stealth body with stealth coating 4. sensor fusion so how many indicator from those does J35 have

[@chrisdoulou8149]

By that classification neither the F-22 nor F-35 are 5th gen. F-22 doesn’t have sensor fusion, while the F-35 doesn’t have supercruise.

[@tigersilberhannes9153]

@@chrisdoulou8149 That makes the russian Suchoi 57 the only operational 5th generation airplane.

[@chrisdoulou8149]

@@tigersilberhannes9153 by that criteria, that and the J-20A, as well as the F-22 post the big upgrade package they have planned for it. To be fair I think it’s not a great criteria, I think at least having most of those boxes ticked, while definitely having stealth, is enough to meet the 5th gen classification.

[@KMASIF-mi9yj]

​​@@tigersilberhannes9153if they manage to upgrade the engine then the su57M will be the most complete 5th gen fighter

[@mill2712]

Though you have to remember this is a 4th generation fighter by PLA classification. (What we consider 5th, they consider 4th.)

[@tigersilberhannes9153]

A gun on an aitcraif these days is rediculus ... unless you need one and you don't have one ^^ We learned that shooting an aircraft gun at a cruise missile is a mighty dumb idea, so they are pretty muchlimited to intimidate groundforces while strafing them.

[@nickl1177]

Thanks

[@Alan-dj5is]

not sure whether the double wheel on the forward landing gear is for stability or stopping power as most of the stopping power is from the arrester cable. The double wheel on the forward landing gear is probably more to do with accommodating the mechanism which attaches to the catapult shuttle. on a single wheel arrangement the hinder this mechanism to an extent

[@christophmahler]

There is no point to compare isolated equipment pieces to another as it is operational doctrine that decides whether an armed force will be relatively effective. The Joint Strike Fighter is a lightweight airframe with significant '5th Generation' air warfare capabilities like 'low observability' and most importantly: *sensor fusion and broadband data-links* with wingmen and ground assets. However, it's main purpose was _to relief the US military budget of the costs of 4th generation lightweight airframes_ (1700 F-16, A-10s, Harriers, EA-6b Prowler) - due to cost overruns and increasing delays in production run and operational mission capability this has failed (see the various reports by the US Government Accountability Office) - except for the British Harrier and the Prowler, the A-10 and most of all the vast number of F-16 have not been retired - while 1500 F-35 airframes are still due for production and the current fleet already producing 6 billion USD deficit for the services into the 2030s (even with a mission capability rate of mere 50 percent - 500 airplanes are not readied even to fly a single mission). The burden of the Joint Strike Fighter on the US federal budget is now at 1.5 trillion beyond mid-century, but prone to rise further due to hidden costs and a decline in US currency (inflation beyond 2.5 percent, annually)... One can ask whether the Chinese J-35 is providing a similar role in 'Airborne Early Warning and Control System' when in formation with other carrier assets - de facto 'overtaking the US lead in Air Dominance at the curve of innovation', instead of directly outperforming in single features - enabling highly successful air raids on US airborne tankers and AWACS with minimal losses, attriting US capacity to wage war in the Pacific. One can also ask whether the J-35 does this at significantly lower costs - which is likely when considering that the J-31 platform has been designed for export since 2014 (with Pakistan expressing interest in January 2024 while recently Russia had offered India the complete production line for the Sukhoi Su-75 Checkmate lightweight '5th Generation Minus' aircraft)... If the US F-35 exports will stall for some reason, the costs per unit will explode - as due to production delays - in any case, US influence will wane with decreasing US equipment and doctrine in Eurasian arsenals...

[@junkerpain251]

The underside rear end all wrong for stealth. And 3rd dimentional vector thrust is also a no no.

[@jimcysiah4193]

China is 4x larger than US, naturally a military should be 2x larger

[@mab2187]

I hope this thing has a gun, not the shitty 23mm Gsh slow velocity gun.

[@davidk6269]

There is a very interesting video uploaded on 6 September 2024 entitled: 'America's “Aircraft Carrier Shortage” Explained' on the KZbin channel called Not What You Think. For those watching this video, you might want to watch that video as well as it discusses the aircraft carrier challenges faced by the US.

[@maxbgi70]

America has claimed that this is a copy of the F35 and funny it has the same digits on represent. IMO, its nearly impossible to reverse engineer each component of a Gen 5 fighter. I dont believe its a copy nor can it be stated so, just because the design is similar, doesnt mean the internals are even the same or similar. The only copy I see is the "35" .. Hell, China makes MUCH better smartphones than America does...so what does America make in tech? Very little vs. China.

[@Amidat]

Chinese media calls it the FC 31 so wouldn't it be the J 31???

[@andrewlim7751]

PLA has not made it official fc31 before affixing the J title.

[@JohnSmith22222]

Great video!

[@MrMAKFoto]

Yet they had to name it J 35. Could be 30 or 36 (one number higher) but no.

[@农夫山贼有点田]

J是中文“歼灭”的缩写首字母，现在你明白J35的命名是不是很有意思😅

[@RectalRooter]

@@农夫山贼有点田 hahahaha

[@pajeetkumar1645]

(Head Wobble) Oooohhhh Saaar this is very good ... Now j35 is almost as good as our Indian 🇮🇳 rafael fighters.

[@RectalRooter]

hahahaha

[@pajeetkumar1645]

@@RectalRooter Saaaar your name is Rectal Rooter we are in desperate need of you in India 🇮🇳

[@RectalRooter]

@@pajeetkumar1645 I'm always ready to help the submissive beautiful Indian woman. Send me on a trip too pimp me out too the Indian woman

[@tda7294]

​@@pajeetkumar1645 hello chowmeen 😂

[@pajeetkumar1645]

@@tda7294 hello Saaar mandeepjeet, have you eaten today or will you be going to sleep on an empty stomach???

[@meanbumboy3108]

is there dignity in a copy with a lagging technology? 1.4 billion brains and could only afford to copy as a state policy? horrible. an insult to the silent citizenry.

[@liaojohnweechun7454]

GREAT INFORMATIVE VIDEO 👍

[@gups4963]

"Superior", don't be gullible. the J-35 lost to the J=20 and was only put on the carriers because the J-20 wouldn't work on a carrier

[@jsyan-ez3ql]

It is unpossible for j35 to use mashine gun shot down missle

[@calibaba2739]

no tail hook?

[@Muwanyaha]

J35A只是空军型

[@lovepapa9559]

Beautiful aircraft 😘

[@lars4953]

You should investigate the inside jobs, instead of this details...

[@kibakobo]

A full separate episode. On latest ICBM launch.

[@thomas_jay]

The plane has smokey engines; and where is the tail hook?

[@mssv19123]

it has lasers to shoot drones....

[@RectalRooter]

Don't forget the Unicorn shit launchers

[@Danielzsy]

as beautiful as xiaomi phone

[@AK-ky3ou]

How many of these will be on carriers in say 10 years in your estimation? This is a big deal and should worry the US and their allies.

[@merrick6484]

Taken into acoount of China‘s "Over Capacity" in industrial production, once its confirm on its final design, its easy to procused 100 planes in one year. F22 Mighty dragon is producing at this rate.

[@moss550]

This will depend on how many carriers they build in the next 10 years.

[@十四弟少侠]

@@moss550 There are also Air Force models available

[@fatdoi003]

@@moss550 there's also the J31 version plus export variant..... they'll either scale back J11 production or expand their factories

[@tigersilberhannes9153]

Honest opinon?! Not very many, this is more of the stepping stone, a proof of concept design and a product for small series to develop the supporting industry. Remember, CVhinas air industry still heavyly relies on imports, with designs like this they can develope their own domestic fabrication of all key components.

[@eddieteh1268]

Big Deal!!!!!!!

[@kumaroadking1580]

Sure

[@taiwanstillisntacountry]

Is it true the sewage system of the 2nd-hand carrier of little-India exploded and 200-ton💩was floating inside the carrier???

[@AtreidesT660]

Not really. What is true is that sewage oil is used for cooking in China.

[@AlanLee-m9o]

​​@@AtreidesT660What a joke, u saw that in your own eyes? 😂 You guys always want to slander China, however what you can just make up fake stories about China. Actually, if you want to criticise China, you could say something such as some workers have to work in weekends, or the unfair for students from different Provence in college entrance examination.

[@AtreidesT660]

@@AlanLee-m9o There's an awesome KZbin video from Serpentza titled Chinas Spit oil and gutter oil. Yeah it shows you guys using that filth to cook food in restaurants.

[@boyachang8569]

​@@AtreidesT660use sewage oil in China, will go jail.

[@CJJerr]

@@AlanLee-m9o 和印度的2B有什么好说的，他们那莫迪老仙被坑成智障了还在那给人数钱

[@ioanbota9397]

Realy I like it

[@liaojohnweechun7454]

WONDERFUL SUCCESS IN A NEW ERA 👌👏👏🥰🇨🇳🥰

[@RectalRooter]

This is no big deal. china will just shoot down their own aircraft. china cannot build a working radar -- fujian sea trials could not identify a circling aircraft -- Not even tell if it was friend or foe.

[@fdjw88]

No image of this plane taking off from any carrier yet. Especially from Fujian where this plane is designed to serve.

[@andrewsuryali8540]

Well, turns out the plane is designed to fly from all three carriers. This shouldn't be a surprise. The plane has the same thrust-to-weight ratio as and larger wing area than the F/A-18E. It's able to take off from the long take-off position of the Liaoning and Shandong, just like how the Super Hornets can take off from the Vikramaditya and Vikrant (they were offered for the Indian naval fighter tender but lost to Rafale-M).

[@RectalRooter]

@@andrewsuryali8540 Can you cite sources. Or is this only your guess ?

[@andrewsuryali8540]

@@RectalRooter This video itself already cites the source. The news that J-35 took off from Liaoning came from Globaltimes, the Chinese state-owned nationalist mouthpiece. This is the media entity the PLA uses to announce its progress.

[@andrewsuryali8540]

@@RectalRooter Just google Globaltimes J-35. It's the Chinese government nationalist mouthpiece that they use to release official confirmation of the status of military projects.

[@alcazarrey1492]

But nobody buy that made in china😅😅

[@HappyPandaBear73]

👍🏼🇨🇳

[@kumaroadking1580]

Just a Chinese copy.

[@archangel7052]

There's rumors going around alleging that a Zhou class submarine under construction sunk. I wish you cover that topic...saw it on CNN today.

[@alifm40DS]

Ah, CNN No wonder

[@Hzhh91]

FAKE NEWS. American journalists can't even tell the positions of Huludao and Wuhan.😅

[@Ybizzy65]

It's all cooked by Western media There's nothing like that

[@李武靖]

我跟你说，武汉那个地方的长江水深根本造不了核潜艇，中国的核潜艇都是在渤海湾的葫芦岛造船厂造的，那个造谣的记者连基本的常识都不懂

[@myl-rh5vu]

这件事情是假新闻，因为媒体报道潜艇沉没的船厂在武汉，但在现实中武汉并不存在具有建造潜艇资质的船厂

[@rubengravina3854]

No video about the Chinese SSN sunk?

[@james_l4337]

It's an assumption by outsider With cranes, only "possible" submarine there Also the water are shallow its internal river, in middle of China Submarine is very hard to "drown" in shallow inland river If that is truely a submarine because the photo is sketchy, plus just like Fujian deck crack highly possible another sensation If it is a submarine, basically just take it back up

[@thewiseone7286]

The US senate approved USD1.6 billion for anti-China propaganda - this reported by many US main stream media. And you still fall for this SSN sunk nonsense? C'mon.

[@lifeisgood141]

As reported by United Slums of America military officials? Haha.

[@knighai4170]

How big is a nuclear submarine? If you compare the size of the submarine in the picture with the size of the nuclear submarine, you will know which one is fake news. This is the launching test of China’s new unmanned small submarine

[@HegelD]

Disinformation is intended to balance the impact of China's strategic missile launches

[@DarkDreams59]

Copy and paste

[@Mearex_]

GG

[@gelinrefira]

I doubt it will have a gun.

[@tylerdurden4006]

Something the uk carrier can't do, launch aircraft that are not helicopters 😂

[@Erik-rp1hi]

Why did the China's new nuclear powered sub sink.

[@xinyiquan666]

it said by a US officer, that automatically equals a lie, instead, only US and end,ya sub sank in recent years

[@xinyiquan666]

no, it never happened, it said by a US, that automatically equals a lie, instead, only US and end,ya sub engulfed to bottom in recent years

[@xinyiquan666]

its lied by " US" as always

[@xinyiquan666]

it is said by US, lol

[@StotzGadbois]

lol.The American media said that the nuclear submarine sank in Wuhan Yangtze River but the Yangtze River is only six meters deep（狗头）

[@alcazarrey1492]

Copy to f35 now become j35 hahha copy cut but not vertical take off and land

[@millmillmill]

Lemon? lol

[@stevenkwan5589]

Why never show full video of J35 take off and landing on Fujian carrier ??? Just show still photo and some video playback of plane ! Dun even know what plane izit 😂😂😂

[@RectalRooter]

Because video of the F18 looks just like the J35 it was copied from. America can only copy powerful china

[@PravdaSeed.96]

💚🐉🇨🇳🐉💚 💙☸️☯️☸️💙

[@lilyplayzz916]

C

[@sonytan-g8f]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@harrythehandyman]

First.

[@arbyocaya2398]

China Copywriting every new from usa like f-35 and f-22

[@imparkmade7357]

Chinese military equipment has underperformed everytime it’s been put to the test in both exsercis and real world use. I wouldn’t compare this plane to the f35

[@theswagman1263]

Any examples? China hasn't been at war in ages. If you're judging based on how export equipment has performed, the same could be said about US equipment in Ukraine. I dont think weapons shipped abroad are a good measure of the overall quality of a country's military equipment

[@thewiseone7286]

Everybody now knows that F35 and F16 sold to other countries and allies have hidden detonators in them like the pagers and walkie-talkies in Lebanon. The US can trigger them anytime.

[@shengzhong2662]

是的，大多数你能看到的装备都是模型，义乌出产

[@pakjai5532]

Egypt is buying the J-10c to replace its F-16s because they are inferior, despite them being in the same gen 4 category.

[@imparkmade7357]

@@theswagman1263 US equipment doesn’t blow in your face

[@chrisquerido4738]

another fake footage. always best in propaganda

[@Wvk5zc]

and yet here you are

[@ducon0000]

Cope

[@tigersilberhannes9153]

possible, but only because all the stuff fromt he americans is propaganda, does not mean that everyone else does it as well.

[@BlackMetalVengeance]

ok boomercon

[@alifm40DS]

Nothing to see here, just a typical guy that got brainwashed or blindly believing that Chinese is bad guys.

[@月隐谷]

Don't worry. On the list of world air force power rankings in 2024. China's air force ranks only seventh in strength.

[@yuanchao3691]

J35和F35谁更强？J35机体比F35更大，载弹量和续航更强，隐身条件下可以携带最先进的PL15远程空空导弹，而F35弹仓狭小不能放置未来MIA-260导弹，其次J35的氮化镓相控阵雷达对隐身目标探测距离几乎是F35的2倍，发现即摧毁。第三F35是多用途攻击战斗机，其极速只有1.6马赫和J35的2马赫相去甚远，而J35是专业空优在速度上成碾压之势，可以预见在J35上舰之后，中国航母打击群的战力会得到质的提升

[@李大人-m7p]

西方报道的核潜艇在武汉沉没，但那里平均水深只有6米，核潜艇根本通过不了😂😂😂