Noam Chomsky - The Neurophysiological and the Mental

Source: • Noam Chomsky speaks ab...

[@Chapperino]

Amazing. I'd love to see more of these uploaded if they're available

[@CoolCat6131]

The whole lecture is 15+ hours and is linked in the description; here it is again: kzbin.info/www/bejne/fH_LoYWrbMqBoKs

[@coreycox2345]

@@CoolCat6131 Thank you.

[@leonsantamaria9845]

The best part of the great... professor Noam Chomsky, is the Neurophysiological mental.. proprieties in the sinapsi is neuro.... because l say so...and I have the power in my ...✍️

[@shewhoisherww84fuckyagoogle]

My great grandfather harold L mitchell was the first successful nuerosurgeon in the world....

[@MrMko323]

Luv it I bet he be a cutie too

[@jesselopes5196]

Searle's position - that the mental is the neurophysiological at a higher level - is too dogmatic for Chomsky because Chomsky wants syntax to be a property of matter

[@قتقبتقتقيت]

the neurophysiologie : we have three sceince in one words they all related with language fro exemple when this human kind when his human fro example when this human want to move with he just sand singles to mind to move they moved but they are related with language.all the respect to the founder of the linguistic moderne.

[@kungfufreak360]

Hi there im a huge fan of your channel. Have you ever considered turning these videos to audio format and making them into a podcast? I was thinking of doing it myself if no one else was going to

[@chomskysphilosophy]

Go ahead :)

[@tourist9862]

please can I find more of these on line? This seems to be a class by Chomsky on philosophy of mind. Where is it online? I'd pay

[@unefemme9260]

Tourist and I'd sell my kidney. We need more!

[@chomskysphilosophy]

There are 9 videos on “The Cognitive Revolution” from Spain: kzbin.infosearch?query=chomsky+cognitive+revolution

[@michaeldebellis4202]

This is from a complete series of lectures that Chomsky gave, I think at some Spanish university. Unfortunately he had a cold most of the time as you may hear in his voice but he was still awesome! The entire series is on KZbin, I think there is a link in the description up at the top that says source that will take you to one of the complete lectures and from there you can find earlier and later ones. I've watched all of them, they are about 3-5 hours all together and well worth it!

[@richidpraah]

There is of course also this one kzbin.info/www/bejne/eqvKipp8r9CnnrM

[@findbridge1790]

anything biological [ie not merely "physical"] has an inherent mental potential -- by virtue of being living.

[@billy-joe4398]

Chomsky's chicken scratch lol

[@uploaderfourteen]

I wonder if the brain encrypts the information it is processing? IF that were true, it would explain the difficulty in mapping mental processes to their underlying physical correlates. We’d look at brain activity and just see noise, in the same way as you would just find noise if you hooked an Ethernet cable up to a speaker. The information has to be decoded before the content can be read and the relationship between the mental and the physical understood.

[@justgivemethetruth]

That is exactly what they are doing. It is not really encryption in the sense that you want to hide data, but it is more encoding ... how is information transmitted and understood within the brain.

[@t.thomas6967]

It is all about doubt

[@citizensofa3401]

The mental is apart from anything else a concept. Szasz was a good thinker on this.

[@TheJonnyEnglish]

Anyone know the nematode study he’s referring to?

[@jesselopes5196]

Caenorhabditis Elegans connectome

[@yuriarin3237]

could it be Francisco Varela on the question side?

[@FThomist]

Interesting! Why do you think so?

[@yuriarin3237]

@@FThomist I guess I thought so because of the accent and hair ( A.I. Lab 1997 Lecture Series: Francisco Varela - God & Computers: Minds, Machines, and Metaphysics is a lecture on YT with Varela talking), but now that I see it again I hear a typical Spaniard cadence, so I don't see it probable that he is Varela

[@FThomist]

@@yuriarin3237 Taking this in account, I think Chomsky misreads the intent behind the question. Maybe the questioner's intent was more driven by the idea that Mind/Consciousness could be a (emerging?) property of biological cells. Just like Chomsky entertains in his third option.

[@FThomist]

@@yuriarin3237 Thanks also for pointing out that lecture. I recently started reading Embodied Mind again and this lecture could assist a deepening understanding of his ideas.

[@same9309]

What class is this?

[@huzeyfealptekin]

Hahahaha Slavoj Zizek

[@Brian-sh5ne]

*sniff sniff*

[@alumidiaz4873]

High school hypothesis development.

[@donaldregnier6182]

Okay, so you're a brain surgeon as well? Big brain Noam, woo who ....

[@yoboi267]

lol Jealous?

[@herlondaveiga3812]

B. F. Skinner is better! Mentalism not explain! Nothing!