Noam Chomsky - Soulful Corporations
3:28
Noam Chomsky on Greta Thunberg
1:12
5 жыл бұрын
Noam Chomsky on Public Broadcasting
4:02
Noam Chomsky - Groupthink
3:56
5 жыл бұрын
Noam Chomsky - Free Speech on Campus
10:31
Noam Chomsky - Sovereignty
1:37
5 жыл бұрын
Noam Chomsky on the Sunrise Movement
6:52
Noam Chomsky on Venezuela
6:34
5 жыл бұрын
Noam Chomsky on Marxism
2:01
5 жыл бұрын
Noam Chomsky on Steven Pinker
6:20
5 жыл бұрын
Noam Chomsky on Automation
2:21
5 жыл бұрын
Noam Chomsky - Problems vs. Mysteries
23:52
Noam Chomsky - Matter and Mind
25:54
6 жыл бұрын
Noam Chomsky - Who Inspires You?
1:17
Пікірлер
@Jay121
@Jay121 22 минут бұрын
Konsumieren Macht Frei
@eric1scooby
@eric1scooby 4 сағат бұрын
And look at us now.
@sivaforutube
@sivaforutube 4 сағат бұрын
what does chmsky say in 1:11 what po po syllables?
@Swaaaat1
@Swaaaat1 5 сағат бұрын
The degree oc which the US have turned to the left is sinister.
@shadmina2093
@shadmina2093 5 сағат бұрын
This man doesn’t know what he’s talking about!
@reyhanzidane8344
@reyhanzidane8344 6 сағат бұрын
isnt this guy from young sheldon?
@mmggzz2626
@mmggzz2626 9 сағат бұрын
this aged well 🙃
@aSouthFloridian
@aSouthFloridian 15 сағат бұрын
🎼 Noam Chomsky once told me the world is a hegemony, that I should read the conquest of bread. 🎶
@1silvervespa
@1silvervespa 19 сағат бұрын
Money ...pure & simple .
@mood1676
@mood1676 Күн бұрын
I love Noam but he is literally making the post modernist argument and claiming that his description of morality is somehow different. he is just switching verbiage in a few cases, but not applying any new argument to counter his own beliefs. In short, he is simply saying he doesn't like postmodernism but that he agrees entirely with post modernism.
@-FALKOR
@-FALKOR Күн бұрын
🇺🇦🎗🌹🇮🇱
@mschluper
@mschluper Күн бұрын
To prove: There is no free will. Proof (by contradiction): Suppose there is free will. Then we would choose to be happy all the time. But we are not. So we don't have free will. QED. --- --- --- To prove: Our choices are not free. Proof: Our choice is determined by our preferences, which are dictated by our mind, the accumulation of all that we "learned" (concluded) from previous experiences. When we enter a situation of choice, our preferred choice is already determined. So the choice is not free; it's determined.
@aaronraycove9517
@aaronraycove9517 Күн бұрын
No man is born with the right to have authority over another.
@oceanic8424
@oceanic8424 Күн бұрын
With all due respect, there are large gaps and holes in his historical knowledge and therefore in his understanding and analysis of the Middle East situation.
@oceanic8424
@oceanic8424 Күн бұрын
Settler-Colonialism?? huh?? Do you mean in the same way that Islamic settler-colonialism conquered, settled and colonized the entire Middle East, North Africa, Turkiye, and parts of Spain? Islam displaced the indigenous populations AND forcibly converted millions to Islam. How is that acceptable??
@milanhange5609
@milanhange5609 Күн бұрын
Christians the slave owners 😂
@Fabio-tk7nt
@Fabio-tk7nt Күн бұрын
Vangard, BlackRock, BlackStreets, Elon Monster, Bill f**+ing Gates, etc, etc
@davidharrigan9884
@davidharrigan9884 Күн бұрын
There are only 2 forces at work, through History Noam explains each event, and asks Why? The bible provides all the answers The Church is just another puppet Hiding behind their Religion They will all be held accountable before God The understanding of DNA now provides simple answers in the last days The Wheat from the Tares The bible explains the Whole story and timetable
@MyRobertallen
@MyRobertallen Күн бұрын
No one in their right mind wants to 'get paid' for raising his/her family. Mothers mother; fathers father. Love and self-respect are their sole motives. It would be a grotesque INSULT to give a parent money for doing their sacred obligation to provide for their children. What Chomsky is suggesting here is, thus, patently absurd.
@MyRobertallen
@MyRobertallen Күн бұрын
Professor Chomsky's analogy does not hold. Raising children is a private matter, the arrangements for which are decided by parents. Making a living, doing renumerative labor, is the sin qua non of being a responsible adult member of any functional society: you avoid 'vagrancy' out of self-respect, which every mature, able-bodied person can do. There is NO excuse for being a bum.
@phaedrussmith1949
@phaedrussmith1949 Күн бұрын
We have been taught to use the words "job" and "work" as though they are synonymous. They really aren't.
@rafaelvalseca551
@rafaelvalseca551 Күн бұрын
Dios y el Estado son funcionales hasta ahora 2025. Lo que nunca menciona Noam Chomsky es la pérdida por opresión, esclavitud... $$$$ y Neoliberalismo han sido, tecnología, educación superior, sabotaje... Los perdedores somos en su 90% pobres. Creo David Harvey, Bolívar Echeverria Eduardo Galeano lo exponen con mayor claridad. Galileo Galilei, Giordano Bruno fueron claros ejemplos de lo anterior. Vivir, ser judío, ser billonarios es sinónimo esclavitud.
@GateGateParagateParasamgate
@GateGateParagateParasamgate 2 күн бұрын
Chomsky is an evil man.
@Sam76475
@Sam76475 2 күн бұрын
Boy do I miss him….todays intellectuals are Jordan Peterson and podcast owners 😢
@ljubastojanovic608
@ljubastojanovic608 2 күн бұрын
Yugoslav Army didnt enter Croatia being already there, and was attacked by Croats in the beginning of conflict.
@felipefonseca3952
@felipefonseca3952 2 күн бұрын
An aproximately adequate portrait of real capitalism, markets and big corporations, with the only exception of this: it's not plausible the idea that all the products and services in capitalism are the worst possible while profiting the most; I think Marx acknowledged very well the progress in quality of technology and efficiency within capitalism and surely we can see that there are some beneficial aspects in many technologies origined in capitalist economic dynamics (for sure, the bad externalities and frequent bad enterpreunership practices when there's no regulations on the markets are clear evidence that capitalism is far from being a perfect mode of economy). Yet there's a major problem here with the thesis of professor Noam Chomsky: the anarchist idea of a society without any kind of subordination as the counterproposal to capitalism has at least these problems: (1) it's required some sort of civil governance authorities to impose legitimate order and to establish criminal justice; (2) the moral anthropology of anarchists is contradictory: we have the overwhelming evidence of the tendencies in human nature to abuse others, be greedy and commit many kinds of moral evil, but at the same time the (not rationally justifiable) hope is that these tendencies will desappear in a social structure without power; I think this is very naive; (3) if it's justifiable and reasonable to not abolish capital or the production's specialized factors and existent technology (socialism doesn't necessarily do that and some sorts of capitalism mitigate and compensate the private ownership of the capital with redistribution programs) then the idea of no subordination as a mandate would be very complicated in this conservative scenario of economic production. It seems possible the existence of non-vicious relations of subordination and responsability in a real democracy without abuse of power and without the huge inequality that results of savage laissez-faire capitalism (whether neoliberal or libertarian); (4) it's a constant tendency in the left the despising of morality and religion (and this is a very dangerous feature because of the amoral atheist relativistic consequences). But if the Bible is the real Word of God (and God exists as the Supreme Good revealed to us through the Mediator and designated Master Jesus Christ of Nazareth in the testimony of the New Testament) then it's not merely optional the ethics and the teachings of the Bible (and that doesn't signify abuse over persons of other creeds or religions though saying this doesn't either mean the denial of the exclusivity of the Bible as the Word of God with ethical authority and containing all the religious truths that are in the Gospel and in all the Holy Scriptures).
@russellm785
@russellm785 2 күн бұрын
Champion of the lazy losers
@Andrew-dg7qm
@Andrew-dg7qm 2 күн бұрын
Work, effort and productivity need to be distinguished from expression and creativity. One could say they produce art work or that they create it, but the difference is in the social programming. Humans aren’t interested in being productive (this is clear in children, burnt out middle age people, and retired people). Productivity happens on its own when we are expressing ourselves. Noam was expressing himself by planting 34 trees - he didn’t set out to be productive and dig 34 holes. He wanted trees planted and the holes took care of themselves. We don’t lack motivation to work, we lack the intuition and self trust to express ourselves in our work and judge ourselves for being unmotivated or lazy or lacking discipline - it’s nonsense
@minskie
@minskie 2 күн бұрын
I’d say we want to be comfortable with ourselves
@HelenWong-x4u
@HelenWong-x4u 3 күн бұрын
Thanks for the KZbin videos and your online materials. I will read over when I get the time.
@blueview8
@blueview8 3 күн бұрын
I think he’s being vague because he wants the viewer herself to discover what resonates with her, rather than listen to well renowned thinkers and conform to their recommendations
@MertSu66
@MertSu66 3 күн бұрын
Whitewashed and unwise. He is damage control. These reasons might be true 40 years ago, not now
@lilFougie
@lilFougie 3 күн бұрын
Bingo! Thank you for sharing the truth.
@faintscrawl
@faintscrawl 3 күн бұрын
KZbin is a tyrannical institution that isn't accountable to anyone.
@ruvenberger5979
@ruvenberger5979 3 күн бұрын
The real question is: what is the self?
@natedaug1
@natedaug1 3 күн бұрын
Love Chomsky and Greenwald.
@1td205
@1td205 4 күн бұрын
Oh, ok. So Chomky had already lost his mind long ago. Lot it.
@DwightStJohn-t7y
@DwightStJohn-t7y 4 күн бұрын
Marilyn Manson in "Bowling for Columbine": keep the public scared, and keep them CONSUMING.
@MyRobertallen
@MyRobertallen 4 күн бұрын
And there's the rub: WSM/Anarchism is unnatural. Plato and Aristotle simply take it for granted that some men are innately workers while another such class owns and manages 'productive resources.' You can even see this division biblically in the labor dispute between King Solomon and his sons and the people of Israel. The wealthy simply have a knack for creating prosperity. Even in our own day, some men just gravitate to Commerce.
@fauziazzurri
@fauziazzurri 4 күн бұрын
Why does U.S support IsraHell?….Answer : Dajjal
@eric0380
@eric0380 4 күн бұрын
He referenced Lotus. This must have been from the late 80s or early 90s
@Laughter17
@Laughter17 4 күн бұрын
Human species in deep trouble with the orange one…no kidding..we are screwed…
@TheLastMisesian
@TheLastMisesian 4 күн бұрын
What a wacko😂😂
@future_beat
@future_beat 4 күн бұрын
Because they run the banks in United States.
@ASPARTAMINE4
@ASPARTAMINE4 4 күн бұрын
Can’t understand why so many have been taken by Chomskys bullshit.
@andrewmau2534
@andrewmau2534 4 күн бұрын
Usually when someone says, We can continue........ I feel like they're trying to get out of explaining they don't know something about lol. Chomsky just feels bored telling us all old information......... I remember when I was little thinking how perfect and amazing a person had to be to be president....... Now I realize it's whoever will do the dumbest shit for the most amount of money.
@TheBitterSarcasmOfMs.Anthropy
@TheBitterSarcasmOfMs.Anthropy 4 күн бұрын
This video aged well lol
@lightlybatteredjustcrispy
@lightlybatteredjustcrispy 4 күн бұрын
We are blessed to have people like this in the world, educating us dumb asses.
@Leonardodikebabrio
@Leonardodikebabrio 5 күн бұрын
Is the other guy the one from my dinner with Andre?
@pagosabob10
@pagosabob10 5 күн бұрын
YES! Why do we support a Zoinist country? I am not anti-semitic at all, but what the right wing zionist in Israel are doing now is so shareful!