I noticed on move 24 you move into a sitting stance and describe the application as a "downward back-fist" rather than a middle front block (as described in the encyclopedia). Is that a convention with AMA? Just curious is all. I have recently moved into a new Taekwon-Do organization and am working with several applications that vary from what I am familiar with, but I always go back to the book when there is a discrepancy. (I most recently trained under GM Choi;s ITF for about 16 years.) I also noticed on move 22 you describe a middle strike to the eyes, although it is a middle straight finger-tip thrust, maybe the solar plexus as a target. These are small things, but I am always curious how the small changes occur and get passed on? They certainly work! Thank you -
@larryb59862 жыл бұрын
Sir if you trained under GM Choi There Is NO NEED to ask a 5th dan ANY questions End of story. I being a 6th Would Never ask a lower belt. ALWAYS refer to the book. Trained with GM Choi a few times and it was UNREAL
@sunilsaxena69352 жыл бұрын
Superc 👍
@sunilsaxena69352 жыл бұрын
322k rates Reece sect free fx
@skunkiemcdunkle33272 жыл бұрын
what even is that terminology?
@bkazilas2 жыл бұрын
Too many mistakes...
@lutecio25662 жыл бұрын
clearly not original ITF Taekwondo...
@michixo16498 ай бұрын
Sigma
@rayyanbhai8642 жыл бұрын
I need to see 4 direction of the video while u perform so that we can learn the pattern clearly
@larryb59862 жыл бұрын
I just dont understand they use the names But moves are different or dont exist in the books
@mackbolan96442 жыл бұрын
Sorry. Not even close
@davidthomas526110 ай бұрын
I think you need to take your grading again , under ITF TKD this is wrong at many levels