The major sell here is safety. The parachute system has already saved lives. I expect the price to go down as more orders are filled and production is more streamlined.
@oscarc3325 жыл бұрын
this is the perfect transition from cesnass to a jet and then to embraer 145 or crj200
@ThatGuy-ob2yw4 жыл бұрын
very expensive transition
@Windtee4 жыл бұрын
I think there's a Vision G1 for rent on Long Island, NY at KFRG, Nassau Flyers.
@markbaker84 жыл бұрын
Does the Safe Return feature have 'Go-Around' if the conditions change on approach etc?
@Sokeresa4 жыл бұрын
This is a great question. I doubt it
@a96531923 жыл бұрын
Well since you are squawking 7700, and it sends out a declaration to tower. You’ll get granted clearance first
@dani737373745 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this video! Would you let me know what's your setup for recording cockpit audio?
@HarveyCohen5 жыл бұрын
Commenters who claim the airplane is a poor value versus competing planes may be right. If so, I'd be interested to understand why there's already 500 orders.
@v1_rotate6384 жыл бұрын
Harvey Cohen because cirrus is good at marketing... and they can up sell existing customers who are flying sr-22s
@Vladdy894 жыл бұрын
This is a very strange question. Put a bitten apple on the fuselage and there'd be 5000 orders.
@2011blueman5 жыл бұрын
I don’t see the value in this over any of the higher end turbo props. The load and range specs don’t fit my typical mission profile, and operating costs are higher.
@3204clivesinclair5 жыл бұрын
Although it may not meet your needs, it does have some unique features, that are not available (to my knowledge) on any turbo prop. BRS (like them or not), they are a USP for Cirrus aircraft. Add the latest flight control electronics that can auto land the aircraft (initiated by a passenger), in case of an incapacitated pilot. The closest aircraft I can think of that has such an easy starting system is the PC12 (latest version), although that is a lot more expensive and larger.
@mikeassayag80444 жыл бұрын
Clive Sinclair and it’s got a parachute
@Enonymouse_4 жыл бұрын
If had this kind of money to spend, this is a toy I would love to own.
@Enonymouse_4 жыл бұрын
@Kelp Farming 😄.. they would still starve if i didnt..
@TobyMcVinn4 жыл бұрын
"or if a Vision Jet is longer a part of their future" What a beautiful piece of corporate talk.
@_monti1423 жыл бұрын
yeah
@lunitedes13 жыл бұрын
$$$$$ , buy a bigger faster one.
@Saintathantwinpeaks2 жыл бұрын
More likely speculators buying early slots so they can price gouge once demand soars.
@richieknecht5 жыл бұрын
Wow, have them do another demo in CT! Would love to go for a ride. KHVN!
@DavideCarbonell4 жыл бұрын
this aircraft have no wiper ?
@cmdmd2 жыл бұрын
Farther: measurable distance Further: progress
@Assassin19595 жыл бұрын
The passenger is not landing the airplane, the computer is landing the airplane.
@tonyunderwood94385 жыл бұрын
The real question is who gets to log it? Garmin? lol
@Assassin19595 жыл бұрын
@@tonyunderwood9438 of course and Garmin will log it as PIC. lol
@a96531923 жыл бұрын
@@tonyunderwood9438 obviously Jarvis
@douglasownbey6564 жыл бұрын
Just saw two of these fly over the house today on their way to Lancaster, PA.
@littlebit6704 жыл бұрын
Now the TBM 940 is getting E-Autoland, called HomeSafe in that plane.
@degentelletubbie3 жыл бұрын
What's the range of one of these at MTOW?
@alexeyzorkin22885 жыл бұрын
Самолет просто космос!
@heavyizthacrown-58423 жыл бұрын
The Auto-land system might allow some with certain disabilities/medical conditions to fly safely again. Great *innovation* Cirrus! 👍🏾
@jarodmorris6113 жыл бұрын
Unlikely. Just because the jet can land safely doesn't mean that the FAA is going to approve that pilot to fly. I don't think the FAA would approve a pilot to fly a jet and no other type of aircraft due to a medical issue.
@biggentallen3 жыл бұрын
Yeah but the FAA won't
@upsidedowndog12565 жыл бұрын
I like the V-tail. My favorite aircraft to fly has that and handles like nothing else in the air, except hopefully this!
@staticon19765 жыл бұрын
this might be a dumb question but what if a bird flys into this port 4:42 ? it burns out the engine and crash land???
@tonyunderwood94385 жыл бұрын
With any single engine plane (turbine or otherwise) the pilot has the option to attempt an emergency landing in the event of an engine failure, but with both Cirrus piston and jet aircraft the pilot also has the option to pull the chute to get on the ground safely.
SE Jet.. but it's turbo prop speeds. For a lot less money you can get clean early model TBM.
@bradfordmontgomery46475 жыл бұрын
Of course you can. But this one is new and a lot of people like to buy new panes.
@MAGApepe5 жыл бұрын
4:00 checklist 10 oxy master on,, but its not,,, i caught ya lol
@videosuperhighway76553 жыл бұрын
The real costs will be fuel costs, hangar costs, maintenance etc… you need to earn about 2M a year with 5-10M in liquid net assets in order to own one. Otherwise it makes more sense to use something like netjets card etc.. and just pay per use. What this jet will do is open up private jet travel to more people since it will make fractional use more affordable. 60 gallons an hour is impressive nice cut in fuel expense.
@Psychopappy3 жыл бұрын
How many miles can this fly
@TobyMcVinn4 жыл бұрын
Cirrus will sell the shit out of these I'm sure.
@ARTDEVGRU2473 жыл бұрын
hell yes!!
@schumzy2 жыл бұрын
If only there was a sound measuring device, to really help us understand how much noise reduction they've done. Guess we'll just have to take their word for it. I mean they wouldn't talk about a negligible improvement just to sell million dollar plane, now would they.
@bodystomp53024 жыл бұрын
I'd like to see Niko upgrade to one of these.
@ram64man4 жыл бұрын
He has a great tdm already that’s more mission ready to his needs that turboprop he has is amazing
@peppeddu4 жыл бұрын
Note the big size high contrast buttons and text on all screens. Where the rubber meets the road and speed/accuracy/safety count they don't do tiny fonts with light-gray text on a white background like the crappy apps on Android and iOS
@donaldholman90705 жыл бұрын
Like the music
@RobertMayfair4 жыл бұрын
The number one reason this thing sells is the ability of its owners to tell people they have a jet.
@naughtyUphillboy4 жыл бұрын
Exactly...........many such cases
@roostersideburns34403 жыл бұрын
id love to ride in one of these
@CraigWilton5 жыл бұрын
Seems like you’re just a passenger in your own plane. Hardly pilot’s aircraft.
@herobo1234564 жыл бұрын
Its about getting for a to b safely not hand flying around the lake on a Sunday. They dont want too many GA knuckleheads crashing them
@Craneman4100w5 жыл бұрын
The rep said you just passed 300 kts but the PFD says 226 kts. My TAS/KTAS Calculator says 214 kts but my OAT Estimation Calculation might be off a bit. I'd consider a Citation Mustang and upgrade the G1000 to NXi before I bought this turkey. It flys faster and higher with more room and seats inside plus a Lav and twin engine redundancy and would cost over a million dollars less. No contest.
@AVweb5 жыл бұрын
Negative. The B-roll you saw was lagged a touch with the actual standup audio, and the frame shows the aircraft's speed just after level-off from the long climb. When the autopilot trimmed it and the airplane settled into cruise, it made 303 true.
@Craneman4100w5 жыл бұрын
@@AVweb Ok, thanks, it just didn't show.
@Craneman4100w5 жыл бұрын
@NonyaBusiness! If you have the cash..... That's the thing. If you pony up close to 3 million dollars for a plane (including taxes and sales commissions) a few hundred dollars an hour is nothing. Keep in mind the million-plus you save buying used. Those savings will easily buy many thousands of gallons of JetA with very generous amounts left over for a paint job and an overhaul or two. Look at many of the used small jets for sale and you'll notice that few have any significant hours on them. You are looking at toys for the wealthy who become bored or no longer willing to invest time into remaining current and move on to the next adventure. Remember, there are a lot of people who can purchase these things with no more financial strain that you would have buying a Happy Meal.
@craigjhr3 жыл бұрын
When Dogecoin goes to the Moon, I might get one of these, since it'll fit in my 42' wide hangar.
@smartcontract79293 жыл бұрын
when ADA touch 100 dollar i will buy a cirrus and tmb 940 e.e
@sleepingwithesirens93973 жыл бұрын
Honda Jet all the way !
@TM-vn3du4 жыл бұрын
Who's the BABE in the back?
@Airplanefish5 жыл бұрын
Your not going to talk about the "Autobrake"????
@AVweb5 жыл бұрын
Sure we could. The braking mode was disabled in this airplane when we flew it last fall. The company made the decision to not demo the braking when the airplane was away from its home-base test environment.
@Airplanefish5 жыл бұрын
@@AVweb I did the first annual inspection on that SF50 you were flying. Right after the inspection it went back to cirrus to get the executive center console thing and the "fly me home safe" system installed.
@alesso91744 жыл бұрын
is this safer than a cesna?
@khali333k74 жыл бұрын
I think so since it has a particular deployment
@GodSonBlessed2 жыл бұрын
If you're super rich this is a better way to spend your money than a Bugatti.
@chippledon15 жыл бұрын
As a curious layman (not a pilot), are there certain conditions that you cannot fly in? Such as high winds - it being such a small craft.
@prestonmiller95525 жыл бұрын
I guess one of my objections to the Vision Jet is the Vee Tail similar to the old Bonanzas. The Bonanzas suffered from fish tailing and often made rear passengers air sick after a time. I assume this is the same problem with the Vision Jet although perhaps a good yaw damper might help. The sound level still seems a bit loud with the engine placement atop the Fuselage. Not sure I would be a candidate for a Vison Jet purchase. I guess I would need a flight test to be sure.
@AVweb5 жыл бұрын
Not an issue in this airplane. It has yaw stability augmentation, and the autopilot's yaw servo automatically engages on the initial climb. No tail wag.
@fiedlertimify5 жыл бұрын
On top with one vs two on the side. Doesn’t seem to me like it would be that big of a difference?
@tropicthndr5 жыл бұрын
That’s why the tail is as tall as the Empire State Building, to get ride of that.
@amiraghazadeh58203 жыл бұрын
👏👏👏❤❤❤
@skiba21sk4 жыл бұрын
Jésus 😍😍😍
@rblx08794 жыл бұрын
I fly this on 9- X plane 11!
@tomatosoupwoo3 жыл бұрын
It’s a g1 in x plane 11 as far as I’m aware.
@marcusjohn66542 жыл бұрын
IF they can every get this aircraft to carry 5 pax at 200 pounds each, and 3-4 hours of fuel, it would make the perfect air taxi .
@Kaipeternicolas5 жыл бұрын
Nice update. I'd still go for the TBM or PC12 I think. I just don't like single engine turbo fans and the Vision Jet just seems like a toy plane to me.
@tonyunderwood94385 жыл бұрын
I go back and forth with the TBM and the Vision Jet as our next one. Number one reason the Cirrus Jet is still in the discussion is the chute. Momma really likes the chute and momma gets what momma wants. ;-)
@mikeassayag80444 жыл бұрын
Tony Underwood I’m on the sAme page Tony. Having a chute on to- of having auto land... there is no comparison for he safety for me and my loved ones. Rugs technology will be forced into higher end jets in the future
@alaskaaksala1235 жыл бұрын
It would be an awesome plane to own...
@thomasauto48623 жыл бұрын
MMM...Jet Noise!!!
@arsenalroo4 жыл бұрын
"more easier"
@sbreheny Жыл бұрын
Unless she did not want it, you should have also credited the employee in the back doing the camera work. Given her young age, maybe she is only an intern, but still, she should be credited.
@nazur724 жыл бұрын
My offer: $2.6 million, not a penny more.
@JoshuaG4 жыл бұрын
If only that emergency autoland are on big jets , hahaha xD
@doolittlegeorge4 жыл бұрын
Good point and of course the problem with a passenger plane is its enormous mass. The airframe basically *falls* out of sky to land. There is no such thing as a *controlled descent* in a commercial plane.
@v1_rotate6384 жыл бұрын
Andrew Doolittle that’s...absolutely not true in the slightest 😂
@clickenpie4 жыл бұрын
Some commercial jets are already implementing/implemented this concept for emergencies when the pilot and copilot are disabled from landing or flying the aircraft
@v1_rotate6384 жыл бұрын
@@clickenpie also false but okay
@ellachen68654 жыл бұрын
@@v1_rotate638 airbus a220 has already achieved cat 3 autoland. So they are already STARTING to implement this. Concepthyper never said it was fully in the systems.
@ga12055 жыл бұрын
Mismatched b-roll and poor grammar from the rep selling a $2.75m aircraft made this grating to watch. Maybe try more than one take and don’t have the intern do the editing on the next one.
@yougotburned21434 жыл бұрын
If they used raw carbon fiber for the center and instrument console it'd look way better and not look so cheap plasticky.
@TumusiimeJoseph-tm8xz Жыл бұрын
Tumusiime joesph
@airbornepotato4 жыл бұрын
16g/h that's awesome
@superchargedpetrolhead4 жыл бұрын
60 gallons/h on cruise, Not even many pistons do 16/h gallons on high speed cruise and this is a turbofan.
@liamhygge5 жыл бұрын
У девчонки глаза разбегаются Она всеми силами пытается снимать, но ей явно не до того
@Craneman4100w5 жыл бұрын
Но она очень милая
@liamhygge5 жыл бұрын
Craneman да))) Особенно, когда сама не может осознать происходящего, будто первый раз в самолете)))
@Craneman4100w5 жыл бұрын
@@liamhygge Я согласен, она выглядела нервной и растерянной.
@liamhygge5 жыл бұрын
Craneman а ты потерянным и запутавшимся. Ибо что ты делаешь в этом видосе? Это ж надо его найти и попасть на просмотр еще
@ItsAllAboutGuitar4 жыл бұрын
Something about the CAPS, the auto landing...I just don't care for it.
@robertlashier87794 жыл бұрын
How does an average person own one of these??
@Captndarty4 жыл бұрын
By marrying a non-average person
@jlalbee3 жыл бұрын
The average person doesn't.
@1biggun7125 жыл бұрын
1 Bitchin jet 😋😁
@tropicthndr5 жыл бұрын
You mean the first version was so noisy for passengers they had to wear headsets in the back, what the fk. That’s definitely not what anyone wants when they ride in a jet.
@creativemode73974 жыл бұрын
The only reason it's noisy in the cabin is because the aircraft is so small, the engine is soo close to cabin to the cabin. Plus, it's one of the cheapest jets you could buy, they don't put thick 100% noise reducing walls in the aircraft. They use whatever material is best for the price.
@glishskiii5 жыл бұрын
Rather have a king air
@CraigWilton5 жыл бұрын
glishskiii same
@armaghanasghar29114 жыл бұрын
Who else is planning to buy a jet because of the pandemic?
@johnames64303 жыл бұрын
he should've practiced his little speech infront of a mirror or something, it was bad
@willie311334 жыл бұрын
Centerline for takeoff is just for professional pilots I guess. 😉
@StreetArtillery3 жыл бұрын
Too heavy
@Xperim5 жыл бұрын
This jet has the shittiest specs out of all jets.
@liamhygge5 жыл бұрын
Xperim and lowest price
@Xperim5 жыл бұрын
@NonyaBusiness! You can get a Eclipse 550 for around $2.5 million.
@chucklesx5 жыл бұрын
@@Xperim... if you do some research the eclipse alot of negatives. The theory of the airframe and ownership mision is great but in reality their production is limited by lack of funds, they have two projects (kestrel turboprop and eclipse canada) that have been on the books for years and neither have shown much progress, again due to lack of money. The company is basically seen as on the verge on bankruptcy most the time by many in the industry. As for the current or older aircraft they have a history of issues including the avidyne avionics suite being tempermental to say the least.
@raymond38035 жыл бұрын
$20,000 plane parachutes or so stupid, expensive and heavy. Never take off without a back-pack parachute $1,500. When things go south, pick up everything that can be used to ID you. Climb out on the wing. Spray paint over plane ID as best you can...…….. *THEN JUMP!*
@WattsUpDev5 жыл бұрын
Dumb as hell try that at the wrong altitude and see don’t you pass out disabling you from pulling the chute, or worse you get sucked into an engine or killed by a turboprop. You’re not a genius there are reasons people aren’t just carrying parachutes 🪂 stop watching so many movies.
@raymond38035 жыл бұрын
@@WattsUpDev Dumb? Really? There's several hundred 737 max passengers that would have took that option if given the chance. 3,000 more who worked in WTC.#1 & #2 Commercial Plane Seat cushions should be back -pack parachutes with a snack, drink, and blow-up flotation devise inside. 138 IQ is closer to genius, than moronic dumb ass.......A lot closer.
@raymond38034 жыл бұрын
@Stool Postssubstantiate that claim
@WattsUpDev4 жыл бұрын
rayism 24b Stupidity is something you can’t debate with.
@raymond38034 жыл бұрын
@@WattsUpDev Don't see "stupid" nor "debate" mentioned in this thread. Why would you?
@trade_design23 Жыл бұрын
While, the young lady in the back is only doing as instructed........ What a Joke !! You need a much better system to hold the camera steady other than someone with a cell phone held at arms length. LOL. Try a short tripod that can be set up on the floor of the back seat area. Other than comedy central from the back, an informative video. And for the young lady in the back... Post your resume, you need a better job.
@raymond38035 жыл бұрын
Ugly plane. Ugly cabin. Stratos, Diamond D ducted engine look so much better. Eclipse 400 and Epic Victory look better Piper Jet looks worse.
@WattsUpDev5 жыл бұрын
You just mentioned a bunch random jets that either no longer exist or lack certification
@enricomosca46744 жыл бұрын
Please don't fly on busy airports... Take-off performances are so poor... Atc here.
@aa1343684 жыл бұрын
Specifics?
@khali333k74 жыл бұрын
I wish if kobe Bryant had this type of cirrus, he wouldn't have died , this cirrus is very ok because of its parachute deployment
@GodSonBlessed2 жыл бұрын
RIP to Kobe, Gianna and all the other people who passed on that day. But this wouldn't have worked for Kobe, because he needed the helicopter to be able to take off and land anywhere like his backyard, daughters gym, his doctor's office the bank etc... You can't do that with a jet.