Michio Kaku on Quantum Supremacy | Closer To Truth Chats

[@07bently]

Thank you very much for the very interesting conversation with Michio please have him on again at your best convenience

[@monstermashed6266]

I agree please give us more of these recent conversations with Michio Kaku, the conversation between Michio and Robert sets this apart from others found on the web and I know that there are more past ones please add to them giving us more current ones

[@Wtvldoc]

Thanks, Robert and Michio for this great webcast. I love the Closer to Truth discussions. As a 93 year old going on to 94th in a few months, I have nothing else but to learn. I have maintained that music is the soul of mankind and learning is the very essence of life. Looking forward to your next web casts.

[@Bassotronics]

Much health and hugs!

[@orenwright7395]

Robert, your guidance of this interview is simply brilliant, an amazing display of intellectual virtuosity! You magnificently navigate all the minefields of the popular interview genre, and thoroughly manage to focus on the objective rather than descending into ego reactions. It's clear in all these Closer To Truth releases that you are often as well informed, as well read, and as intellectually adept as your guests. Amazing to watch! Michio Kaku, notwithstanding his genius, unfortunately is prone to calling up popular media-based replies, and you do a brilliant job of pressing him to refine his responses.

[@sneckim]

I completely agree. Mr. Kuhn has a keen intellect which always shines through in the myriad conversations he has and shares. But I also appreciate his humility, which also shines through as much as his intelligence. I’ve been a fan since I happened across a CTT episode on my local PBS channel some years ago. I’ve been a hooked follower ever since.

[@JoeSpeedway]

When answering the simulation question, Prof. Kaku went back to digital computing it seemed. I wish the question would have been asked again in regards to the quantum computer with all the infinite possibilities of supersymmetry- could an advanced civilization that has solved the problems of quantum computing use that quantum computer to simulate a universe like our own? Perhaps your next question 'Is the Universe a quantum computer?' answers the question in that the size of the quantum computer would need to be the size of the Universe itself- in which case, my mistake. Either way, I so appreciate you both. So many years- so much enrichment. Thank you

[@alejandropflucker4857]

ASTONISH ME WHAT AN EXTRSORDINARY PERSON IS MR. KAKU....INMENSE CURIOSITY AND KNOLEDGE AND GENEROSITY TO SHARE ALL OF IT . .THANKS A LOT BOTH FOR THIS EXCEPTIONAL INTERVIEW. SO MARVELOUS AND COMPLEX.....THANKS A LOT.

[@katherinecooper6159]

please stop shouting!

[@kandaboy3026]

Kaku is a world treasure. I love him.

[@davidclark538]

Hes a hack tho .

[@stringX90]

​@@davidclark538The more I listen to him, the more I think that. Notice how he kinda kept repeating a few phrases this video? Strange.

[@augustinemmuogbana3382]

@@davidclark538 What is a hack?

[@philjohn2649]

Stumbling across Closer to the Truth is right up there with taking up running, both happened nearly 4 years ago and both are life sustaining ❤

[@bibib2455]

Kaku is the best … running 🏃‍♀️ to buy his new book for sure .

[@Sammasambuddha]

Michio says: I'm a... a scientist a professor a teacher a researcher a physicist a internet personality a thinker a writer and more! Thanks for letting us know what you are!

[@mohinderkumar7298]

Inventer? Invented anything? Nothing!

[@Sammasambuddha]

@@mohinderkumar7298 Inventor? OH, he's added lying now...

[@marcelmolenaar5684]

I am totally a nobody but i do understand that the concept of quantumcomputers and qbits will always remain a theory

[@ryanskynet6423]

Michio Kaku is out of control…

[@ssantiago5231]

@sammasambuddha and what have you achieved in your lifetime cumstains on your bed ?

[@africanfiestacafe3440]

Thank you, Professor Kaku. I like to have my mind teased and my thinking stretched in all directions. With my husband, we used to enjoy our pillowtalk of multiverses, entropy and the quantum computer. And ever since I was a kid, I always thought that if humans can imagine something new, never before done or made, it will eventually be possible to do or make it. The tools and methods will need to be developed, but the original ideation is enough to spark the energy required . Thanks again for your insight, explanations and hypotheses to watch closely

[@buliameenoladayo3074]

Such mind stimulating pillow talks is a whole level of excitement and having a partner like that to discuss that with every so often is the ultimate romantic happiness. I wish you guys greater years together while I pray to have someone like you as a wife.

[@ryanskynet6423]

Have room for me ?

[@jiancao1523]

Best talk show on quantum computing. Now I understand the parallel universe and mathematics behind quantum experiments proven. All the paths and probability and chosen paths.

[@VipulAnand751]

Thanks Robert. As always curiosity increases after watching episodes of closer to truth .

[@premkumar9608]

Kaku lectures interviews are just class of its own.

[@arty8255]

Excellent interviewer had the subject down, weighed the answers of Mr. Kaku with possibilities.

[@myla88expatlivinginus26]

I can’t wait for quantum computers revolution. I been watching all michio kaku video and he’s one of the greatest physicists. His theory and explanation’s the most easily understood.

[@letsif]

Michio's eternal positivity and optimism is very welcome and refreshing.

[@DrJanpha]

I bought one of your books and I intend to purchase this one too. THANKS

[@robertholland7558]

But do you read the books, let alone understand and comprehend it?

[@TheTroofSayer]

Another great interview. At 25:31 Michio Kaku leads into the Schrodinger's-Cat thought experiment. To my considerable relief, at 27:48 Robert presses for specifics, steering the conversation in the direction of commonsense. At 29:42 - "No doubt about that, but the interpretation is obviously critical to the foundations of quantum theory." With that, Michio leaves the question open, acknowledging that nobody knows (phew!). Both Schrodinger's-Cat & Many-Worlds are unfalsifiable conjectures that are taken far too seriously. There's something else going on, and focusing on SC & MW distracts us from considering other possible, more likely, particle-observer interdependencies.

[@jaydenwilson9522]

@@noelwass4738 most theories are science fiction until we get more than mathematical abstractions.

[@jdsguam]

"particle-observer interdependencies" - this is the first time I've heard anyone theorize that. To me, that makes total sense and so I searched for a video relating to particle-observer and came up with nothing. Must not be very popular for some reason. I don't understand why not?

[@patrickl6932]

Kaku is just as sharp as ever. This is a very entertaining interview. Closer to Truth rarely lets me down. What a fantastic channel!

[@lirenchan]

I enjoy every minute of this conversation; It is also every informative. Thank you very much.

[@michaelhendriksen3122]

Not agree - Why not you ask - My answer is : I enjoy every single (nano)second 🎶

[@savemeows]

It might come as a shocker to some and also me.. but this is the first time im watching michu being interviewed by some one who knows physics and why i feel that michu is not answering what he is asking specifically and mostly giving general documentary tv show level answers?? Plz tell me if im wrong here ...

[@KylerBorn]

US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has already said that quantum computers will, by 2029, be able to break existing public key infrastructure like 128-bit AES encryption, which is currently used to protect sensitive information sent over the Internet

[@johnn522]

What a delight that someone like Robert's exist , it seems that people with a real urge to find the truth while applying the fullest objective attainable measures are very rare!

[@monchoglu]

Love Michio, such a optimistic thinker but grounded to the physical principles, he would be an amazing science fiction writer.

[@falconsfrontier]

I first heard of Michio Kaku's infectious and wonderous predictions of the future, that sense of optimism, awareness and knowledge of the future, was shown in a show in 1996, called Future Fantastic a brilliant programme starring Gillian Anderson as the presenter. It was a amazing show, which featured many enlightened individuals and without question, Dr Kaku, certainly invoked the crucible of inspiration.

[@denissolomon855]

But

[@tvacc6174]

M. K. is an incredibly wise, brilliant visionary.

[@manni123]

Thanks

[@dangraboi]

Great chat! I have lots of new insight into the universes of quantum computers. Thanks.

[@ezreality]

Great video Robert Thank you...

[@munchaking1896]

I want to go back to the 50s. Everything was so much simpler before the internet.

[@bender8100]

It's amazing. People who destroyed the brains of millions of children say that computers will make us happier. And we believe them! 🐑 🐑...... They are in a simple contraddiction : if the brain is a muscle and we stop it to do his own job it won't do it anymore. So science please... Try not being so stupid

[@elmastoras1]

Excellent. On the question of the possibility of a 'Matrix', the answer can be taken as humorous.

[@TanDeRamos]

Such an amazing conversation.

[@ColleenGoodall-sh7mu]

Thank you for your gentle nature while teaching a complex subject😊

[@HHXOXHH]

Amazing interview. I've seen a lot of videos on the topic but some of his explanations and insights were just superb.

[@TerryBollinger]

28:23 Kaku _“… in a room … there are radio waves [from] all over the world … but your radio is only tuned to one frequency… Now replace these radio waves with electron waves… of dinosaurs, pirates, atoms of all sorts of things… Why can’t you touch them? … Because, just like in radio, … your electrons do not vibrate in unison with them.”_ Michio Kaku, using pirates and dinosaurs makes this one of the more entertaining many-worlds explanations I’ve seen. It reminded me of my early teen years when I entertained friends with stories of how different dimensionalities - e.g., Flatland, though I didn’t know that name then - might intersect invisibly with our own 3D space, allowing all sorts of marvelous things to exist next to us without us seeing or touching them. Given the Fourier relations of quantum mechanics, I readily understand the temptation, even to Nobel Laureates, of explaining astronomically subtle distinctions between adjacent Everett composite system states by replacing them with a blindingly obvious and utterly non-physical radio-carrier-wave model. It’s utterly non-physical, not just because Everett never proposed such an idea, but because even for the low energies of ordinary FM radio broadcasts, the needed density of carrier waves needed to represent even a “small” multiverse in such a room would instantly vaporize its residents. It would be akin to labeling ants by applying a distinctive mountain to each of their backs. So what mechanism _did_ Everett propose to separate his universe states? In his view, the creation of a single new observer-observed pair somewhere in the universe was the _only_ difference that, after a universal Fourier transform, created a new and _fully_ distinct state of the entire universe, one that in his model was just as distinct as spin-up and spin-down in a single electron. That new state would then slice off some astronomically small slice of the _entire_ energy of the universe to make the state real. It would be extraordinarily similar to other states but quite real, with finite energy. Ditching the carrier-wave nonsense, let’s look more carefully at what “extraordinarily similar” means for Everett’s actual strategy for creating multiverses. Imagine an electron wave function one meter across - difficult, but not impossible. Someone at the edge of the wave function observes it and finds the electron either next to his instrument or a meter away. That’s an example of the situation that, in Everett’s view, creates a new state of the _entire_ universe. Next, picture the state of the universe as one of those Pinscreen pads that captures the shape of whatever presses against it. Observing the electron results in a single meter-wide pin clicking into either an up or down position. That pin, and that pin _only,_ is the difference that keeps the two Pinscreens “unique” in quantum superposition space. To give you some feel for the size of this universal state Pinscreen compared to a one-meter-wide up-or-down observation pin, shrinking the universe-spanning Pinscreen from one meter per pin to one _atom_ per pin gives a Pinscreen about 10 lightyears across. Since the massive-overkill FM wave analogy has nothing to do with Everett’s thesis proposal, what is the _actual_ distinction he used to distinguish between two possible outcomes of an observation? It’s that _one_ pin: a single atomic column in two sheets 10 lightyears across. Everything else is _identical_ on both Pinscreens. But at that one point, there’s a mismatch that keeps the sheets pushed apart from each other. That’s the correct image for how subtly and delicately the two states are isolated. Furthermore, the sheets must also be rigid in a way not comprehensible to material physics. And finally, the two sheets must _instantly_ separate if they are to become entirely separate states - you can’t have annoying speed-of-light delays. (A side note: While many feel the greatest attraction of the Everett model is its “smooth” use of differential wave, the astonishing impact of _every_ observation on the _entirety_ of the rest of the universe makes it anything but smooth. A more accurate description is that it uses upside-down quantum collapse on universe-spanning steroids.) You might think, well, at least the “instant” part is OK. These are _quantum_ wave functions, and photon wave functions millions of light years across collapse instantly when telescopes look at distant galaxies. So, “instant” is not a problem. Right? Ah… no. Ask anyone in quantum security how long it takes for entangled states to spread far enough from each other to become usable for security. The answer, part of commercial hardware, is easy: The speed of light. Break that assumption, and you get no entanglement and no encryption. That _has_ to be the case. Otherwise, you could use entanglement to transmit data faster than light speed. It’s widespread, though I genuinely don’t understand why, for folks to _assume_ that the formation of an entangled wave function is just as “instantaneous” as collapse. However, the two phenomena are entirely different. The event that _spreads_ the entanglement is the Schrödinger wave equation, which, in its 3D embedding, spreads no faster than the speed of light. It is only the event that _collapses_ the wave once it forms that appears “instantaneous” to observers. What this means for Everett’s idea is not complicated: According to physics _as observed in labs,_ you must wait 93 billion years for the impact of observation to reach the edges of the observable universe before you get a new, entirely orthogonal universe state. That’s give-or-take an eternity since that universe keeps expanding as this goes on. Finally, a critical closing note: The math behind the Everett approach is _classical_ math. That is, it is math based on the assumption that perfect points, lengths, angles, and orthogonality of infinite numbers of dimensions are all _fundamental_ concepts that need no further explanation. Special relativity and quantum mechanics have not supported such thinking for over a century. However, because these maths arose in the 1700s and 1800s and are emotionally appealing to human analytical styles, they got grandfathered in and applied as if they were _more_ fundamental than the classical physics that inspired them. The observable universe doesn’t use classical maths, but one of the essential features of the maths it _does_ use is that they powerfully and persuasively support the emergence of the classical approximation, that is, of locally “real” xyzt spaces. This support is why classical maths are so incredibly practical for such a broad range of physics problems and can even be bent and fractured (renormalization, anyone?) enough to support most aspects of special relativity and quantum mechanics. This support is also the source of the powerful temptation to _assume_ that their infinite limits of the xyzt approximation must necessarily be “just as true” as the partial versions that enable history, life, and the persistence of information. The infinite rigidities and speeds behind Everett’s observation-driven, hyper-speed, quantum state formation model are an excellent example of the dangers in applying antiquated classical-first maths and axioms to the deeper structure of the universe that gave rise to such approximations in the first place. (a PDF copy of this 2023-05-07 comment is available at sarxiv dot org slash apa) (expanded and updated the PDF copy, but not this one, on 2023-05-08)

[@jmanj3917]

1:02;03 Well said, Doctor. Well said. This gives me a whole lot of perspective, and it also helps me remember to stay humble as a simple human being. Thank you, both of you, for yet another excellent conversation. Go Bluejays!

[@georgeeleftheriou5817]

What Michio Kaku talks about is more science fiction rather than real-concrete science... It may be good for igniting the imagination and inspiring young minds to explore the realms of science, however my personal preference would lean towards a more objective approach when talking about these things.

[@GaryChurch-hi8kb]

I hope Robert and Michio and myself live long enough to see our life extended and eventually extended indefinitely. I personally believe as long as we have a limited lifespan we will most likely go extinct as a species. Our collective survival depends on our individual survival.

[@mmdurfee]

Quantum no doubt is going to be a much needed upgrade. I find after hearing about QC capabilities, that I have many question of the interface. Will it only analyze large datasets like protein combinations instead of taking the form of a wearable device of some purpose? If its a bunch of corporations, the military, and intelligence agencies that should throw up some red flags just as much as a criminal organization. The regulations are going to be paramount just as much if not more so than the application of what results from the computations.

[@ivantheterrible4317]

A computer that has the power to make the whole internet vulnerable, to find new cures, new materials, to make realistic simulations at practically anything can not be a person's product. It would be centralised and we would pay to use these machines like in AI subscriptions but much higher in prices. I expect the QComputers to be practical both in Hardware and Software in 2040s.

[@alphasuperior100]

Michio Kaku is old in body but young in heart and mind.

[@markuskoarmani1364]

It would take decades for new IBM Condor qubit to decrypt SHA-256 with the highest encryption. Do you really think they can run the 1000 qubit processor for decades? does realistic value mean anything to you?

[@muthucumarasamyparamsothy4747]

Thanks,Michiko Kaku, Our physical body, and our soft ware Mind is also unstable, hence there should be some stable, unchanging,all knowing ,Quantum System that operates and executes all events in the so called Universe.

[@PrinceBlake]

"We're talking about virtual chemistry, virtual biology, This is incredible. Instead of having to create test tubes with thousands of different kinds of chemicals, it can all be done in the memory of a computer. That will speed up the finding of new drugs at an infinite factor because we can do it at the speed of (9:35) (light) inside the memory of a quantum computer." A quantum computer puts a mouse in a maze and calculates all possibilities instantly. All possibilities, not one by one, but it instantly looks at the entire array of possibilities. That's why quantum computers are, as I mentioned, infinitely more powerful on certain tasks (15:35) (equal to 935 seconds) versus digital computers" The contrast between the physically tangible, hands-on method of experimentation versus the virtual method in quantum computation enables instantaneous results to difficult problems that otherwise could take weeks even years of laboratory and real-world confirmation. This is the magic of the Echo-Borne mechanism, a discovery born from the flora and fauna of Houston's most prestigious near-city neighborhood and serviced by Memorial High School at 935 Echo Lane. For many years the Memorial-area public high school also served as the home to the only K-12 Japanese school in the entire Southern United States. Michio Kaku's famous search for an equation no longer than an inch has yielded its treasure within the Memorial ecosystem thanks to the workings of gravity within the love story of a Memorial-area lifeguard from Houston, the son of a NASA scientist, who fell madly in love with a department store sales gal and the niece of Japan's most prized Bizenyaki potter, Kei Fujiwara.

[@ante3807]

Wow, that was extremely interesting. Great conversation!

[@CUMBICA1970]

45:20 "The more powerful the hardware the more versatile the software that you can write in it." In that vein, is there already any algorithm or even language that can't be run on a binary computer? Even if we put tons of them working in parallel? He also mentioned Moore's law slowing down. But isn't this law all about muscling up ie turbo charging the conceptually same processor? Or is he suggesting that a powerful enough binary processor can be as good as a quantum computer?

[@petersinclair3997]

There could be a physical limit to how small a microchip can be reduced. Heat is an issue with reduction. QM computing is being proposed to be far, far more efficient than using ones and zeros.

[@petersinclair3997]

What my ape brain does not understand is, how can a QM computer know the position of an atom without decoherence?

[@PhilosophicalMusings]

Robert, can I be so bold as to suggest a topic? I think the greatest philosopher of the 20th century was Ludwig Wittgenstein. Wittgenstein was probably the greatest since Kant and Hume. My suggestion has to do with his final notes called On Certainty, which is a very interesting look at epistemology. One of your life's quests has been the pursuit of knowledge, especially as it pertains to consciousness and all the metaphysical implications that comes along for the ride. Some of his ideas of what it means to know are profound and worth exploring. Unfortunately Wittgenstein never finished his final notes before he died in 1951. One possible person to interview would be Professor Michael Potter from Cambridge. Great show by the way.

[@kelvsim3235]

very confident and optimistic guy

[@LuciFeric137]

Thank you Dr. Kaku!

[@christian78478]

Great respect for our friendly neighborhood Genius Dr. Michio Kaku. Greetings from Georgia, Tbilisi 🤩

[@tonyjuliasto682]

THANK YOU SO MUCH

[@marshallwright7221]

Dear Michio, I have read 7 of your books. I have never become too involved in the use of technology in science, I am interested in how the universe evolves and reacts. Technology can help the human race become more spoiled and lazy. Technology for me in some ways is a distraction between the natural universe and man's intervention. In some ways I think that deep space travel is not necessary. Deep space travel is difficult because, it is hard to up-grade. Moor's Law proves that computer technology has to constantly improve every 2 years. This is difficult to do when you are 250 light years from earth. Deep space travel is a one way ticket! Computer technology can only go as far as our minds can think or develop. So as you can see, humans have a long way to go in the mental creative thinking process. We only use 5% our DNA, the rest is waiting to be down-loaded with information. Maybe we should focus on the DNA and utilize technology to increase information in DNA structure. My game, is before Point Singularity Expansion because, that is where all the action is for breaking new ground in theoretical Physics. I get goose bumps every time I think about, before Point Singularity Expansion. Understanding the universe leads to more mental expansion. As a galaxy travels through space it creates friction, as a result energy is increased, by how much, I am not sure, I have not done the math yet in order to understand the amount of frictional energy. One thing I can tell as a reality, to study nature is to understand the atom and the universe, and this is no secret! Energy, energy, energy, this is the way to enlightenment! Marshall Wright

[@Bill..N]

Fascinating stuff but with subtle undertones of a very scary brave new world...

[@urimtefiki226]

I am in the 34 th book of quantum, now I will continue for more.

[@PaulSchwarzer-ou9sw]

Kaku is the best!

[@pnf197]

Excellent conversation and Michio was fantastically simple and clear about quantum and AI revolutions that we are in the midst of now. Like any other technology or tool humans have created, it carries both the hope of progressing the human condition on one hand and the gravity of the reality of human depravity on the other hand. It seems to me 'that' equation is always present at each moment in an individual's life or of humanity itself. Weird eh!?.

[@yt249137b]

The best ever explanation of quantum computing using parallel universe

[@harrylen1688]

Two of my fever scientist! Thank you!

[@Metacognition88]

I would like to purchase his book but i dont know how to read.

[@ganesankrishnamurthy8658]

Man of infinite possibilities. ❤

[@ApteraEV2024]

30:00 anything is possible., but not determined until a Decision/Action occurs. PAST, PRESENT, Future

[@maluboy23]

12:00 can also be used to put funds into accounts as well 🤞🤞🤞🤞

[@peter5455]

For a wider subject coverage, i give several thumb- ups

[@jonathandavid3298]

Robert Lawrence Kuhn is fantastic. He should be the main news anchor for the US covering science, philosophy and psychology with the thought and insight he does. How great if he expanded into news, politics, etc. I'm so sorry to have to say this, Michio's ego and self-importance got that better of him a few years ago, taking him from visionary to just kookoo. Much of the gobbledygook we get from Dr. Kaku isn't even scientifically sound. I looked forward to hearing this brilliant man before but it's like his celebrity scientist status went to his head.

[@Bather12]

Is Michio slowly turning into Doc Brown? Brilliant stuff. Thank you x

[@joshkeeling82]

Favorite KZbin channel, hands down! I'm so thankful for the closer to truth series $100 bucks says Michio starts by saying "When I was a kid, my mother..." 😂

[@ritishify]

Hahaha you know he's gonna set that "The never ending story" vibe. Sometimes it worries me the accuracy with which he repeats himself lol.

[@CUMBICA1970]

HAHA He's our old uncle that tells that same story on every thanksgiving gathering. But we all get along because we all love him 😅😅😅😅

[@moodlab_music]

[@Andrewlohbihler]

He didn't this time.

[@igorflexus9493]

Hahaha love it..

[@KetogenicGuitars]

If you want to get the consciousness transferred then you need to synchronize some moment of the target nervous system and source brain. First you need the perfect copy of the brain cells with all the (virtual) nervous cells in the same state. This is due the idea that all thinking is learning. Every thought througout the life are unique learning process which brings about the consciousness which protects itself being distributed. Without perfect sync of that learning in a moment no same consciousness can be replicated. And the brain cells die too without notice. It seems such a sync is not possible even with quantum computer but they are also sensitive and represent similar challenges. New consciousnesses can be created but not recommended.

[@sneckim]

Thanks for posting this interview. It was fascinating. It made me, in my early 60s, wish I could live 100 more years to witness the miraculous changes quantum computing and AI will bring to life and society - amazing! But the downside is also very scary and frightening to contemplate. Excellent program.

[@alphyapp]

Summary of the conversation generated by Alphy: - What are quantum computers and their potential applications? Quantum computers use qubits instead of bits to compute on individual atoms, making them infinitely more powerful than traditional digital computers. They have applications in calculation and factoring, optimization, simulation, and more, making them useful in industries such as automotive, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, finance, security, and energy. Quantum computers can help with tasks like developing super batteries, creating fusion power, simulating protein molecules and cells, and cracking codes for security purposes. - The intersection of quantum computing and medicine Quantum computing can be applied to different categories such as gene editing, antibiotics, cancer treatment, and the immune system to isolate and compare different cancers, understand molecular mechanisms, and recognize germs. Quantum computing vastly increases the power of software programs like AlphaFold, allowing for a better understanding of proteins and their function. The union of software and hardware is the future, and with quantum computers, new discoveries in medicine and disease are possible. - The potential drawbacks and ethical considerations of quantum computing While the potential of quantum computers is great, they also come with downsides such as the possibility of breaking cryptography, making criminals and military organizations un-hackable. When robots become self-aware and have their own self-programming capabilities, they may not align with our desires. Virtual immortality is already a possibility, but the ethical implications of creating a software program that is indistinguishable from a deceased individual's memories and conversations must be considered. - Quantum mechanics and its role in various fields Quantum mechanics is the foundation of the process of photosynthesis, which is essentially a quantum chemical process. The Feynman principle states that an electron takes an infinite number of paths from A to B, making an infinite number of copies of itself. The universe could only be the way it is due to the strict constraints of quantum mechanics and relativity, which is why string theory is the only solution that fits. - Speculations on the future of robotics and AI The possibility of AI becoming conscious is a real one. The possibility of creating organic robots made of wetware exists. Robots of today are not self-aware but have the potential to attain consciousness in the future.

[@Daniel-qy9mb]

When answers to questions are unknown, Michio goes out of his way to dream. The hope that exudes from Michio is inspiring.

[@aroundandround]

2:30 Why are the interviewer’s eyes purple and why does Kaku have a white dot on the left edge of his lower lip?

[@salwaneleyland5874]

Thanks kaku i see what your doing hears have a hug

[@sam_console]

I wrote a book and it's a pain to get it noticed, but the bigger reason is that I have the actual theory of everything in mine. You don't need a quantum computer, you need a new approach to theoretical physics which I came up with and got a full theory of everything that makes more sense and takes care of the problem of the singularity.

[@sharma6186]

Do tell, stranger.

[@fractalfred1]

Yes. I am anxious to hear your TOE.

[@sam_console]

@@fractalfred1 if you want the full theory, give me your email address and I will send you the google docs copy of it. It is lengthy, but interesting none the less. Even if I'm wrong it's never a bad thing to hear a different theory.

[@sam_console]

@@sharma6186if you want the full theory, send me your email and I'll be glad to send you the google docs link for it. Its lengthy, but interesting.

[@izzibreezes68]

Really well performed interview! Great questions, thank you.

[@ingabaronaitehammoud6495]

I like Michio Kaku. Everything he said is true. He just forgot to say humans already travel at speed of light.. some like him😉

[@horaciokiffedel6184]

Immortality is a big word…. But living 30000 years is acceptable

[@rudiberg5868]

Well done, new thinking

[@rickhaines927]

Amazing. Symply Amazing

[@greggc68]

Michio never fails to deliver myriads of colorful fantasy bubbles.

[@wildone106]

12:46 good thing we are focused on trans equality in the military!!

[@peweegangloku6428]

I love the humorous part: "Dogs are confused because dogs think that we are dogs."

[@Tom_Quixote]

Dogs are parasites that have infested human society by displaying behaviour that we interpret as human.

[@ApteraEV2024]

13:30 can't we have 2 factor, random password generator ??

[@juansanchez7769]

It’s time to upgrade! We always go forward! 🇺🇸

[@jdsguam]

"In principle, a quantum computer with 300 qubits could perform more calculations in an instant than there are atoms in the visible universe."

[@hawkmaster381]

1:07:00 This sort of thing happened with Superman's Father in the Fortress of Solitude.

[@stephenzhao5809]

Regarding with parallel universes, there're two types, balks (vertical parallel universes) and pews (horizonal), respectively. Only dead cat and alive cat simultaneously exist with same a probability in pews instead of balks which is assumingly called "time dimension."

[@micc6462]

All get but what kind of weapons will be designed

[@danielm5161]

great chat

[@longcastle4863]

Nothing will ever be supreme or the last word.

[@wayneasiam65]

Is that your last word on it?

[@longcastle4863]

@@wayneasiam65 No, this is. Or was...

[@diegoarmando8795]

Except God the creator.

[@longcastle4863]

@@diegoarmando8795 April's Fools Day was last month.

[@akrilla5929]

What does it mean for something to be supreme? Like quantum supremacy?

[@glennpaquette2228]

Michio Kaku always sounds like a salesman. There's a reason for that.

[@arturoeugster7228]

Dynamic programming is the ultimate optimization tool suffering from the dimensionality curse, which can be solved with quantum computers.

[@wayneasiam65]

Why may be because of Entanglement. The probability is somewhat Scanned, with great filtering and connectivity with Entanglement. Quantum Mechanics may have existed and evolved to great ability.

[@AlonRonni]

The third factor in the merging of quantum computing and general AI needs is cryptographically encrypted IoT (Internet of Things) implementation for communication purposes.

[@LeeDavid61]

It will be interesting to see a combination of quantum computing and AI possibilities are unlimited. A treat or an opportunity for humanity

[@OfficialGOD]

thermodynamic computing would be nature not quantum

[@literaturix]

The day we know what consciousness even is, we can further debate whether software could ever develop consciousness. At this point, and after millennia of scientific and philosophical thought, we know absolutely nothing about consciousness.

[@gregoryhead382]

The string is limited to: 0 P_max = (c^90909/(G^22727 Newton^22726)), in theory.

[@mervilan1]

if someone develops a quantum computer, then he may use it to control widespread use of the said computers ... for power, and money. In effect, that person can do anything... prolong his life, cure his illnesses, develop weapons to protect himself or dominate others, and be the richest person on earth! Is this possible? So why would he share said computer with others?

[@blue-xb1cq]

@22:00 - imagine just a little tiny part of you can be detected quantumly ( part of the heart for example), a quantum disrupter can kill you faster than the speed of light. Your soul may not even escape!

[@crucifixgym]

It’s amazing how scientific advancement lives in parallel with NYC that is no better or different than it was in 1989

[@paulmint1775]

Awesome stuff thx