Can you imagine Fallon doing this interview? They'd have dunked Oreos and played charades until the clock ran out.
@sdawg48346 жыл бұрын
LMFAO I agree!
@alextownsend59336 жыл бұрын
I love Jimmy Fallon but his show is VERY VERY different than Colbert's.
@hugohugo9905 жыл бұрын
Fallon is trash
@golden-sun5 жыл бұрын
He would pop a blood vessel to go 8 minutes without hitting his desk from laughing so i dont think so
@danielstack41584 жыл бұрын
Wow, Fallon would need his best fake laughs for O'Reilly's comedy.
@Lucas_Jeffrey8 жыл бұрын
I understand that Bill has a very different perspective on the world than I do. I think this was a very good interview and Stephen Colbert did a fantastic job of meeting in the middle. Great discourse.
@MichaelDominici19688 жыл бұрын
Truly. A real robust discourse. Bill still has the fire, but he didn't resort to name calling, nor did Colbert. An important and instructive discussion.
@Some.Donkus.8 жыл бұрын
agreed, I was actually really happy (and surprised) to see something constructive
@simonpmccullagh63208 жыл бұрын
a robust discourse? we need more war? the war that created ISIS? the bounds of the argument were severely limited.
@ntd888888 жыл бұрын
Agree. In this day and age of constant name-calling and derision of opposing viewpoints, this discussion was notably refreshing. O'Reilly and Colbert both conducted themselves like adults and with respect for the other's intelligence, despite their differences of opinion.
@MISHMOSH1218 жыл бұрын
can't help but feel that Bill's argument is not coherent though.
@adamdewaal3408 жыл бұрын
Am I the only one that thought this was a constructive conversation between two different 'sides' trying to solve a problem?
@hjcontacts8 жыл бұрын
nope..
@23085218 жыл бұрын
That's what I saw
@kalnyc18 жыл бұрын
No, you're not. It was exactly that, and I wish people bashing would just take a breath and watch it again.
@dylangoldberg61648 жыл бұрын
I completely agree, this is amazing
@Gregster3608 жыл бұрын
It was, except for the crowd.
@pedrorockstar8 жыл бұрын
Bill O'Reilly sounds much more reasonable when he doesn't interview himself in his own show
@whatsupdoc33858 жыл бұрын
because Colbert calls him out on his idiocy and 2 steppin'
@christopherstone43368 жыл бұрын
+Doc Bartley Eh
@duharrhea59248 жыл бұрын
+Jay S They went so far as to stage the Orlando Massacre? Wow, you are really able to see through the veil. I am impressed with capacity to reason.
@ggff37617 жыл бұрын
Pedro Paredes exactly he seemed really reasonable here but on his own show he just shouts and screams and it makes him look stupid
@mars99533 жыл бұрын
Agreed. I don’t like this man but from this interview , he is a smart man with valid points of view. Surprise me.
@JulianLloydMarketing8 жыл бұрын
Bill had me then lost me then had me then.... on and on and on.
@MeeGrrLoves8 жыл бұрын
The guys a lunatic 😲
@MsSHINeeTVXQSuju8 жыл бұрын
same XD
@karinefonte5168 жыл бұрын
That happens because he says something you wanted to hear, then something you disagree, next a lunatic idea, then smth plausible and repeats the process, not in the same order.
@kams71708 жыл бұрын
I agree with you Julian. had to listen twice.
@WallEWorld8 жыл бұрын
He completely lost me after he mentioned "War"
@thatsnotagoodidea8 жыл бұрын
"You need to put the fear of God in these people." I think they got that fear already. That is why 50 gay folk are dead.
@RoboJean19948 жыл бұрын
*claps*
@To_Live_Is_To_Suffer8 жыл бұрын
Na that was the fear of the fact he couldn't get dick off his mind
@Ineddiblehulk8 жыл бұрын
Well put.
@chunkylover53678 жыл бұрын
+Peator what you gonna do about it?
@GR-ym8po8 жыл бұрын
logic doesn't work with bill
@lokithedriver8 жыл бұрын
I love it when Bill's on the show!
@tehjamerz8 жыл бұрын
Brainless shill
@yourmother32078 жыл бұрын
Yep. Opposites attract.
@maherdabbagh948 жыл бұрын
for you
@jujuria138 жыл бұрын
bill's a turd. Look how he was for the Iraq war.
@maherdabbagh948 жыл бұрын
Juju jujuria so was hillary
@koshyjeffrey574 жыл бұрын
I love how Colbert stopped the audience from drowning out his guest. True leadership by a host
@Crasher_78 жыл бұрын
Despite me disagreeing and dislike Bill O'Reilly's view and personality, I actually had some degree of respect for him. I mean, despite him disagreeing and arguing with people like Stephen and Jon Stewart all the time, at least he respects their opinions and actually has his own logic to his arguments. Unlike some of those people who are just loud noises and no substance.
@regalia87178 жыл бұрын
Not so much with Stewart. I'm quite sure he actively dislikes him, borderline hates him like the rest of Fox. Apparently Colbert and Bill are actually sort-of-friends.
@SamLiburd1578 жыл бұрын
+HiddenTalent77 Come on now, those two clearly respect each other (albeit in an adversarial way) and it showed when they did that debate. They've been on each other's shows quite a bit, and while they fundamentally disagree on a lot of issues but you'd have to really dislike O'Reilly to think that Stewart does too.
@Crasher_78 жыл бұрын
Sam Liburd What I see as well. Stewart invited him to the daily show numerous times despite their hostile encounter and Stewart mocking his views. He did write something when Stewart retired from the show that he dislikes Stewart for what he is and what he stands for, but O'Reilly did said he respects him for having the guts to voice his views.
@Crazmuss8 жыл бұрын
Hell yeah, last war on terror went so good!
@Darkfalz798 жыл бұрын
Hope and change and appeasement is working wonderfully for Obama.
@beatrizmoreno92058 жыл бұрын
The reason Obama has to deal with this crap is because of the intervention and meddling done in the middle east in the first place.
@swirlyswirl83698 жыл бұрын
Obama has bombed these people to no avail
@tumortime5498 жыл бұрын
+Swirly Swirl that's why we need to stop bombing them and put troops on the ground and fight their bull shit propaganda from gaining them anymore allies
@Crazmuss8 жыл бұрын
sean robinson that kind of propaganda that say "oh USA want to destroy us, we need to defend, lets all get weapons and shot those 'red coats'"?
@matthewdowd78898 жыл бұрын
the audience is incredibly annoying...
@1stsampan8 жыл бұрын
The audience (carefully selected) act to pre-planned teleprompters. All set before the program.
@ZiggyZoggy8 жыл бұрын
there may be some teleprompting and editing, but if you've ever been to a live television taping you'll know that they aren't preselected and and you are relatively free to react naturally. If you over react you can easily get kicked out, but I think this was more a case of his audience skewing very much toward his demographic which is very left leaning.
@LouisKing9956 жыл бұрын
munjjja The whooping and holaring is annoying regardless of which way the audience is skewed.
@alextownsend59336 жыл бұрын
@@1stsampan They've come to see Stephen not to see O'Reilly.
@vaxan51265 ай бұрын
Lol trumpie
@armandandrade98038 жыл бұрын
At least Colbert has the balls to have someone on his show who has a different ideology
@boliussa5 жыл бұрын
not only that but he had the balls to try to have an honest conversation unlike david letterman when letterman had o'reilly on and ducked conversation with cheap jokes.
@zachcamara5924 жыл бұрын
At least Orielly had the balls to go in front of an audience with a different ideology... much harder to do
@testla33833 жыл бұрын
John Stewart went to him a bunch of times
@angelodeluca75573 жыл бұрын
Zach James colbert did the same when he went on the O’Reilly Factor years before this
@jameschrisdavis8 жыл бұрын
I feel like Bill represented his viewpoint very well. I dont agree with everything, but it was a refreshing change to his usual self.
@Cosmodjinn8 жыл бұрын
You can't declare war against an enemy without a defined location/leadership/ect. Otherwise there's no defined end-point and we are in a constant state of war.
@cyberblunt8 жыл бұрын
im writing your name in for president.
@BryonLetterman8 жыл бұрын
The Islamic State actually has a self defined area of land
@civicsr2cool8 жыл бұрын
it's one thing to declare war on a radical religulous ideal, it's another to arm and fund said organization and then a few years later winder why it's doing all this lol
@LotsaFails8 жыл бұрын
Um, we are already in a constant state of war.
@brendonmize8 жыл бұрын
*Defined Location:* Iraq, Syria, and "the Levant." *Defined Leadership:* Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
@LordVoytekh8 жыл бұрын
O'Reilly made some great points
@rat77108 жыл бұрын
Im not going to lie... but, I agree.
@mulmeister60638 жыл бұрын
This is by far the most i have ever liked bill o reilly
@TroyBraiden2 жыл бұрын
Because you never listened
@billyin4c514 Жыл бұрын
@@TroyBraidenNo, it's because he was a professional propagandist for 20 years.
@drdelete8 жыл бұрын
I face palmed myself so many times at O'Reilly my face is swollen.
@xoxosahar8 жыл бұрын
would you mind expanding? I usually hate this guy and i hate the idea of a war but for some reason some of the points he made resonated with me?! semi made sense? or maybe i'm just being daft.
@absolutiontheory988 жыл бұрын
I thought he made some decent points with the exception of a few.He didn't go as O'Reilly as much as I thought he would.Maybe those years being smacked talk by his guests had made him realise
@TheBmw45458 жыл бұрын
+Sahar H IMO, the mindset of these people needed to change, we as Muslims need to do it. Our greatest weapon is SOCIAL MEDIA. These assholes use social media to recruit? we should use social media to inform. I'm sure some marketing company could help with the campaign
@xoxosahar8 жыл бұрын
TheBmw4545 i suppose i just feel like those people are so far and gone and so brain washed that i can't imagine being able to bring them back into the light. that could be a useful tool in preventing more people from becoming radicals, but i can't see it working on people who already are.
@Tormentality8 жыл бұрын
I would be curious wtf resonated with you? I don't see how war will reduce gun deaths.
@Vip3rC4in00228 жыл бұрын
"We have to put the fear of God in these people..." Wait what?
@MilkmanConspiracy8 жыл бұрын
I think the fact that they have the fear of God is their problem.
@thejunecooperative8 жыл бұрын
They're both Catholic, that response wasn't unfair.
@Blittsplitt58 жыл бұрын
typical Christian unnecessary phrase
@brechelt18 жыл бұрын
Google: "Figure of Speech."
@eluzioncf89628 жыл бұрын
It was a figure of speech...
@vick59718 жыл бұрын
I usually do not agree with this man but this time I actually agreed with what he said. Great points.
@-Diamond-Dave-8 жыл бұрын
I agree
@iangeitner19838 жыл бұрын
Same here. Did not see this coming.
@ooDirtyMickoo8 жыл бұрын
dont pretend like youve been following him, you never seriously listened to him in the first place.
@iangeitner19838 жыл бұрын
haha you edited your original post. Why?
@ooDirtyMickoo8 жыл бұрын
Ian Geitner because i wanted to reword my comment.
@GRepp-iy1nj8 жыл бұрын
this idea of "winning" is what is the real poison.
@jimzheng49128 жыл бұрын
What are you, a loser?
@krispykr33m28 жыл бұрын
+Jim Zheng Hahaaaa nice, you beat me to it
@sureshots988 жыл бұрын
He is talking about the war against the idea. Which is thousands of years old and can not be destroyed by brute force. The kill them all strategy is creating enemies that hold grudges forever.
@vanhaver51508 жыл бұрын
And Clay, you're a complete fucking conspiratorial idiot
@Ufachotchin8 жыл бұрын
I think he understands that rather well considering he proposed (in this video!) that the United States declare war on the groups you listed.
@idistroy1118 жыл бұрын
Bill is an interesting man but he does make some good points
@Royo20138 жыл бұрын
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO THIS MAN WANTS TO SEE THE WORLD BURN
@hyperion10288 жыл бұрын
+Royo2013 You can't just say that he is wrong just because he is Bill O'reilly c'mon.His points are valid this time.
@Krissieo8 жыл бұрын
+許錦文 Agreed, he is on point this time.
@missbubblegumdrops8 жыл бұрын
Bill always makes sense, if you actually watched his show or read his books you'd know this, but you've been brainwashed by liberal media to believe he's wrong
@BobBob-ui6ot8 жыл бұрын
There was one part that he said that isn't factual: the idea that everybody in America owning guns helped them win the American Revolution. We only gunned down 10,000 of theirs while they popped off nearly 25,000 of ours. It was actually guerilla warfare and foreign intervention that gave the Americans the win.
@bloggs248 жыл бұрын
There is 112.6 guns per 100 people in the United States, how many more guns does the USA need before they feel safe..... from guns....
@tacticalultimatum8 жыл бұрын
Where I live there is about a tenth that number. With a population of 100,000 we have had 0 firearms homicides in 52 years. I can go get a gun right now with a suppressor and a 10 inch barrel in about 120 seconds. In the US it takes 6 months and $200
@bloggs248 жыл бұрын
Tactical Ultimatum Where do you live?
@tacticalultimatum8 жыл бұрын
bloggs24 An island called the Bailiwick of Jersey. We have our own laws but are under the protection of the British army and accept the Queen as our monarch.
@bloggs248 жыл бұрын
Tactical Ultimatum Well thats interesting, it only took a little bit of research to work out that Jersey has 10 guns per 100 people (112.6 per 100 usa) And those 10000 guns are owned by around 1800 people, which averages 5 guns each, which still isnt even fair to say, because 130 of them own 10 guns each, and one man owns 306 guns. Considering that data, and that 1800 people out of 100000 owns guns, Jersey really has 0.55 guns per 100 people (112.6 per 100 usa). My little bit of research also says these guns owners are either collectors or members of the gun club. www.gov.je/SiteCollectionDocuments/Government%20and%20administration/R%20Income%20Distribution%20Survey%20Report%202014-15%2020151112%20SU.pdf Those statistics are pretty interesting too, nice employment rates, salaries and welfare benefits. www.gov.je/Health/Travelling/Pages/MovingReturning.aspx Oh look at that, you guys are also part of the NHS, cheap/free healthcare. www.indexmundi.com/jersey/demographics_profile.html Oh would you look at that too, the non white population is 2.4%, I dont suppose racial tension is an issue in Jersey? Dude your tiny little (almost segregated) island does not compare to the complexity of the United States and its gun problem, sorry.
@tacticalultimatum8 жыл бұрын
bloggs24 So to make the US safe you need to make it mono-racial, and affluent. So guns aren't the problem after all. Also, anyone can buy a firearm you don't need to be a collector/club member. Not sure why it says that.
@LastSider8 жыл бұрын
Bill has some good points but, man its like hes on a quest to hear himself talk everytime.
@ronaldbarnett19428 жыл бұрын
talk shows always have applause and laugh signs how else wood letterman get any laughs and applause from his outtaed weak monologues
@ronaldbarnett19428 жыл бұрын
hes trying to get you to listen and understand
@thevillainable8 жыл бұрын
Sorry Ronald but those are natural reactions from a caring public.
@warsilver998 жыл бұрын
Evil is subjective. The guy had mental health issues. Guaranteed his mental health is what drove him to his radical views in the first place.
@agriperma8 жыл бұрын
I would be classified as "liberal" by most folks, and I cannot stand O' Reilly , but I do agree with him on the issue of the declaration of war with ISIS, they are at war with us. and the world. and the free nations of the world ( NATO) need to get together on this. yes it need to be intelligently, no blanket bombings, and drones shooting up weddings. we need to hit them were it hurts, their in their pockets. currently the oil fields they acquired, they are selling oil cheap on the black market to finance themselves, these are the real targets.
@maxrice69908 жыл бұрын
Lol Bill has short patience. He starts off the show speaking very politely and choosing his battles, and eventually gets himself all worked up. I love how Colbert has had Bill on the show all these times recently. Their conversations are always interesting. Next think you know, Colbert may appear on the Factor...haha
@maxrice69908 жыл бұрын
Also, I want to read Bill's new book and watch the show. I saw a preview for it on TV and it looks pretty good.
@artistrg34878 жыл бұрын
Of course he got worked up. He's surrounded by close-minded liberals!
@Kntrabssi8 жыл бұрын
+ArtistRG34 the comments section of this KZbin video is primarily liberals giving respect to Bill O'Reilly. That is possibly the most surprising sentence ever written. It is literally the opposite of close-minded.
@maxrice69908 жыл бұрын
ArtistRG34 I felt like Steven was acting quite civil, didn't interrupt Bill or anything, and the crowd was even pretty behaved.
@artistrg34878 жыл бұрын
+Josh King No. I'm glad to see that the comment section respects Bill's opinions here. I just meant the liberal audience in the show. After all, it is LA, California.
@iBooa1238 жыл бұрын
Wow, I think I at least partially agree with Bill on this O__0
@73528462927361918 жыл бұрын
He's usually a little bit correct
@theredscourge8 жыл бұрын
He says some irrational stuff, but he's a lot less crazy sounding when he's not take in out of context sound clips.
@parthschannel8 жыл бұрын
The guy argued we should declare war so that the government can detain its citizens without any real reason! That's ridiculous, I have no idea how the right wing can get behind that.
@iBooa1238 жыл бұрын
Parth Kotak I said partially. I definitely can't get behind that, though I'm not a republican. I do think he is right that eliminating ISIS's leaders will generally lower the amount of people who are radicalized.
@my-back-yard8 жыл бұрын
Anyone who thinks Mateen should've been apprehended prior to the massacre knows what he's getting at with that, respectfully. Really, it's the same concept that allows Obama to assassinate American citizens (Alwaki in particular)without due process.
@streglof8 жыл бұрын
... and for self protection you absolutely need automatic assault weapons to be available for everyone??
@tacticalultimatum8 жыл бұрын
Do some fucking research before you post man.
@ninjafruitchilled8 жыл бұрын
Semi-automatic is all you need for devastating effect. Even the military almost never go around blasting their assault rifles in full-auto mode. You can't hit anything that way. To effectively aim at people you need to fire one bullet at a time, unless you have a bipod. Not to mention you run out of bullets very fast if you just spray them everywhere.
@jakeabc1238 жыл бұрын
Serious question, can't bump stocks make AR-15s essentially automatic?
@Opticillusion1608 жыл бұрын
Do your research. Automatic weapons are illegal. No one has them. "Assault weapons" is a word used to describe scary looking guns that in actuality have the same rate of fire as a pistol just with a slighly larger clip.
@tacticalultimatum8 жыл бұрын
***** I know right hahaha
@NoXoNaToR8 жыл бұрын
Bill stepped up his game, I like it. Count me in. Strange he made so much sense.
@seriesoftrucksandtub8 жыл бұрын
He keeps losing some of marbles though, which is the main issue.
@twonumber228 жыл бұрын
lol
@hyperion10288 жыл бұрын
I agree with Lex XD
@soimboredandtesting8 жыл бұрын
Honestly, it was the same ideas, just delivered with a level head. A few rational center-right ideas with a lot of radical right sided ideas thrown in. That's what bill usually does, but with a much louder, obnoxious voice. It's a good example of the fact that people care much more about how something is said opposed to what is actually being said.
@chriscross95058 жыл бұрын
What Bill said makes u feel better just like what Bush said thru that magaphone after 9/11 made u feel better. But what they both prescribe won't work better. You can't declare littoral war via congress on an ideology. You need to outsmart it. Out think it. Defeat it. The Soviets were not beaten thru war.
@littleripper3128 жыл бұрын
I love the kickass American attitude. They don't let anyone push them around.
@I_AM_BAYTOR8 жыл бұрын
I wish the country as a whole still had it. The terrorists really did win on 9/11. Turned folks into a bunch of pussies.
@RigorArts8 жыл бұрын
9/11 did the exact opposite; after the 9/11 attacks, millions of men and women enlisted in the military to destroy those that harmed the country. Same thing happened after pearl harbor
@I_AM_BAYTOR8 жыл бұрын
RigorArts Yeah, for like 3 years everyone was "united" and full MURRICA FUCK YEAH. Then people got tired of Bush after he failed to deliver and we've been in some weird apathetic state ever since.
@bstrader8 жыл бұрын
This was a great interview (both parts). I kinda cringe at Colbert's disrespectful audience, and of course I don't actually watch his show on TV because I don't have a converter box or pay for cable. But on topic -- O'Reilly was well-spoken, shared his opinion well, and brought up a lot of really good points. I felt like Colbert responded occasionally in ways that he knew would get a response from the audience, rather disingenuous, but if it gets ratings fine. All said, pretty solid interview. Could have been handled by a better host, but this is TV.
@zmail85668 жыл бұрын
👍 well said
@Links1372418 жыл бұрын
Colbert was far too gracious to this loud mouth. The people cheered because he made good points. Whenever Bill is wrong he just tries talking over the person arguing against him. In all fairness to Bill though, he did make much better points than your average gun stroker. I don't agree with what he said completely, but his reasoning is subjectively sound.
@zmail85668 жыл бұрын
***** I think there is some substance to the third point, don't the kurds need help? Can't leave the middle east alone getting destroyed by terrorists. Idk tho
@iBooa1238 жыл бұрын
1) His point is that you would take out ISIS (and only ISIS), working with the Syrian/Iranian/Israeli governments as well as NATO and UN allies. It's not about overthrowing a dictator a la Clinton and Bush, it's about eliminating a group of invaders who are radicalizing people all over the world and attacking innocent civilians. 2) Banning guns isn't a great solution, but I admit this was not his strongest point. He is right, however, that if anyone in that nightclub had a handgun, or even a taser, (it was a gun-free zone) that man could have been stopped in those three hours and several more lives could've been saved. 3) I don't think going to war is necessarily the best option, but he is right that we need to stop the people taking this ideology to the extreme. That will deter other people from becoming involved with it and at least reduce the problem. However, we must be careful not to turn it into a mass killing of Syrians, like Ted Cruz suggested, or even take the Trump approach of violating Muslim rights. If we let our hate make all Muslims into enemies, we will radicalize them all against us. This is the main flaw in neoconservative logic-- killing a bunch of people makes enemies of other people who would otherwise be peaceful.
@Links1372418 жыл бұрын
I disagree with the "more guns" argument. There were 3 cops nearby that DID shoot it out with the culprit.
@thekittenmillord8 жыл бұрын
Those seemed to be some pretty nuanced ideas coming from O'Reilly. He's definitely stepping up his game these days.
@theplantbasedmangoinghisow50688 жыл бұрын
Did we watch the same video? He just said he wanted to destroy isis but didnt explain how. He is such a nationalist and a moron he doesnt get killing civilians in syria will create more radicals.
@thekittenmillord8 жыл бұрын
I don't rep O'Reilly, but he laid out a basic game-plan in as much detail as can be done in a couple minutes. 1. Mobilize NATO troops to deploy to ISIS held areas in The Middle East 2. Declare War on ISIS through a Congressional Declaration 3. Focus on taking out ISIS troops and areas, while simultaneously working with local U.S. sympathetic forces to move in and take over from NATO forces when areas are stabilized 4. When ISIS is insolvent, and basic stability is achieved, demobilize, and head back home, assured that regional powers will do their best to keep the peace. It may lack some detail, but O'Reilly is not a military strategist, and indeed any war plan is going to require a lot of flexibility if its going to work. Too much detail, and things start to fall apart when it comes to actually achieving it. I don't necessarily agree with every part of this plan, but it is at the very least, a coherent and reasonable plan.
@xxGravyBabyxx8 жыл бұрын
+TheGuyWith 9000 views and no videos i dislike bill and i am a proud demo but bill did say how he was going to solve isis. and thats through NATO and U.S involvement. the u.s, belgium, france, middle eastern countries, asain countries, and other european countries like Britian and Germany have all ties against ISIS. this woulf be a great coalition and destroy isis in months. Soilders volunteer to fight and protect their countries so let them go and do whats best for our country. we can not destroy isis by drones. we need to send boots. i never agree with bill and half the time of this video i did not agree but for once i finally agreed with him on destroying ISIS
@MrCalist3r8 жыл бұрын
He also had a good plan to tackle the issue of gun control that reconciles both the "national pride" of the second amendment and the increase of mass shooting prevention. The plan being to restrict the sale of particular threatening fire arms. Backing it up with the effectiveness it had in Australia.
@theplantbasedmangoinghisow50688 жыл бұрын
What u guys need to understand about radical islam is killing people in ISIS wont stop extremism. If the people of syria see us invading and killing them, they will only hate the west more. You have to be smart about convincing the people that their ideology isnt what its meant to be. Violence wont end the religion unless you are planning to kill every syrian person in a large genocide. Bills plan is like bush'. Intervention will only cause another problem, killing officials is a short term strategy that will ultimately achieve nothing.
@Oloren8 жыл бұрын
Wow.... 1st time I've seen Steven lose a debate with any one....
@howdydutt1e8 жыл бұрын
Are you serious, Bill O'Reilly beat his wife and claimed that the shooter beating his wife was an excuse. We have Killed Hundreds of thousands of people in the middle east, Isis is almost dead but their idea is the only thing still around. Bill is a nut
@DeFreshS108 жыл бұрын
Do yo umean "lost"? and it wasn't a debate, it was a conversation, and no, Bill is a moron.
@n8van28 жыл бұрын
That's because he wasn't debating. He was interviewing. The questions he asked weren't debate questions, they were interview questions designed to give people a deeper understanding of Bill's side. It's obvious Stephen disagrees with Bill on a lot of this, but he doesn't argue him, he only challenges Bill's convictions.
@clarklionsfan1578 жыл бұрын
The funny thing is many don't even realize he is a comedian who says things to get a laugh. Many get their "news" from here or Comedy Central even.
@BornInsane08 жыл бұрын
what the fuck? It's not even a fucking debate Colbert was just asking answers and got them from Bill. I swear everyone has to make everything a fucking competition.
@svillegassmusic8 жыл бұрын
Bill o Reilly actually made sense
@Tubeytime8 жыл бұрын
He usually does.
@COBYKOEHL28 жыл бұрын
IF YOU'RE A NAZI
@sandollor8 жыл бұрын
Heil you doin' mein friend?
@elijahbowen15998 жыл бұрын
He does most of the time -Someone who leans to the Liberal side of politics
@hexi64858 жыл бұрын
I agree. I find that people on the right are starting to make a lot more sense than the regressive left.
@BizzBizz698 жыл бұрын
I have two family members who joined ISIS, yes that is correct, two close family members who just upped and left their family and loved ones to fight ISIS. Here I am, a Muslim, fasting during this month (ramadan) to gain more apathy for the less fortunate. And there ISIS is killing innocent people. My two family members that joined ISIS were drug dealing, good for nothing criminals. Meanwhile at the same time, I have close family members and relatives in the Kurdish Peshmerga fighting ISIS, while also fasting. Please, understand what I am trying to say here. These people do not represent me, or my family, or the true followers of Islam that are fasting during this holy month, and that are giving charity during this holy month. I have nothing to say, this is not justifiable and is absolutely disgusting. I ask if you are religious, no matter what religion you follow, pray for the deceased and injured, and for their families. Please stay safe and do not be afraid, or else these disgusting criminals will win.
@StripesofShay8 жыл бұрын
I'm a Bernie supporter and don't agree with his ideas at all. However, it is nice to see a republican seem to care and have a fire under their ass to do something and make the change.
@nolanchoy55698 жыл бұрын
what does being a bernie supporter have any relevance to what you said later?
@chknrsandTBBTROX738 жыл бұрын
I'm vegan
@bryancommisso8 жыл бұрын
I'm a feminist.
@AdamSno8 жыл бұрын
I'm a vegan atheist feminist. (jk I love hamburgers)
@ivdrip-r2r8 жыл бұрын
I'm an Irish-American
@tanner27098 жыл бұрын
This is one of my favorite videos I've ever seen. 2 men with seemingly opposite viewpoints who come together to intelligently share ideas and debate on the proper course of action. Yet they do it in an intelligent and diplomatic manner.
@BadassRaiden8 жыл бұрын
I dont agree with O'Riley on a lot of things but he is 100% right about one thing. You cannot contain evil. You must destroy it. Good must conquer it.
@xiliox68928 жыл бұрын
You must first detect evel eh. There is no arab drilling land in texas mate but they are sure texans drilling in the desert eh? So they think you're evil, and you think they're evil Hm...there might be, just might be a another solution to this?
@roddydykes70538 жыл бұрын
In all the efforts to destroy this "evil", don't you think a lot more "evil" will be created in other parts of the world in retaliation for the US deciding what's good and what's evil?
@roddydykes70538 жыл бұрын
+prometheus 1978 You're absolutely right, if the middle east's oil dried up tomorrow, the us would be packed up and on it's way out faster than they declared the search for weapons of mass destruction
@BadassRaiden8 жыл бұрын
I think the majority of the entire planet, with the exception of communists, dictators, and religious extremists, agree that killing innocent people, for any reason is evil. The US isnt deciding what is good and what is evil.
@BadassRaiden8 жыл бұрын
Hes absolutely right? His entire comment was literally a jumble of words that a 10 year old couldnt comprehend. Also we are talkin about Religious extremists and ISIS not the "war in Iraq" which was about oil.
@mrmeeseeks67878 жыл бұрын
Bill O'Reilly: "we have to put the fear of god in these people." lol uh no, that is a part of why they do the things they do.
@zaxx298 жыл бұрын
Best comment in on this video. Their God is what inspires them. If the Christians' God cut them down, two more stand in it's place like a martyr hydra. And ideas can't be crushed; Bill is right on that. But destruction isn't the same thing as showing the wrong parts of it. No ideology is completely right, but there is a common ground for good within each. And there we, as humans, will find peace.
@citizenghosttown8 жыл бұрын
Yup. the one thing that they aren't lacking is "the fear of god"
@franzkafka778 жыл бұрын
Thank you Sir! Well stated.
@eluzioncf89628 жыл бұрын
It was a figure of speech bro...
@swaggdocttaa8 жыл бұрын
Its an expression
@Justin-wd2vy8 жыл бұрын
Yes, bring up Japanese concentration camps. That helps prove your point...
@Ben-pp5tt8 жыл бұрын
It's relevant. If we declared war on ISIS on our own soil it could lead to a similar situation.
@Justin-wd2vy8 жыл бұрын
Ben Larsen Of course it's relevant. All the more reason we shouldn't do anything like that as a country ever again.
@xolotlnephthys8 жыл бұрын
+Ben Larsen People aren't ethnically members of ISIS.... You can't know who is a member unless they admit it, you can't send people to concentration camps based on a hunch. It is not the same as Japan.
@Ben-pp5tt8 жыл бұрын
+Xolotl Nephthys We weren't at war against "Japanese people" during WW2 either. We were at war with the motives of the people in Japan just like we're at war with the motives from people in the Middle East. If we were against Japan based on ethnicity then we would be guilty of ethnic cleansing and no better than the Nazis. Just like it's hard to tell who's a member of ISIS, it was hard to tell which person in the USA had Japan's motives. That's why Japanese people went to concentration camps. The same could happen to people from the Middle East.
@HomestarCrawler8 жыл бұрын
Japanese concentration camps? You mean the camps run by the Japanese where they were commiting genocide? That has nothing to do with the topic being discussed Justin, he was talking about internment camps run by Americans where Japanese Americans were safely isolated during WW2. There's a major difference. And his point was that he disagreed with them.
@quittingcreativity8 жыл бұрын
It pains me that Stephen doesn't take it to Bill the way that he might have used to on the Report, he's smarter than this, he can argue better than this, it's so frustrating to watch him take smack from O'Rielly's pompous ass and give nothing in return.
@gigistoner80048 жыл бұрын
Notice Colbert did a face palm? Yes he can do much better, but he is owned now. I'm sure he likes his gig and his pay check... but I'm sure there are times (like this one) that he wished he could really let his wit fly.
@SuperSupermanX19998 жыл бұрын
Why would he though? Bill was making good points and Stephen's job was just to ask questions that would direct the conversation. There's no point trying to argue with or "own" someone who's saying the right things.
@soimboredandtesting8 жыл бұрын
He didn't bring him on the show to shut him down. He just wanted to hear his pov, and share his own.
@justinhamilton86478 жыл бұрын
He was a character on the Report.
@Joseph-zm6sy8 жыл бұрын
I think Stephen wants to show everyone that there is another opinion out there and that we should consider them
@jonasv02017 жыл бұрын
As a European I am shocked by the american belief in solving any conflict with military power.
@TokinTaylor8 жыл бұрын
"We have to put the fear of God in people and we have to do it soon." Isn't that exactly what the Jihadist regime is trying to accomplish? There isn't a difference, you're just praying and acting under two different God's.
@TokinTaylor8 жыл бұрын
+Irshad Husain Then let me rephrase that, they're just praying and acting under two different religions. It's all the same at the end of the day though.
@jahamilton8 жыл бұрын
Except Muslims don't except Jihadists as fellow Muslims. Kind of like Christians don't except the KKK as fellow Christians.
@TokinTaylor8 жыл бұрын
+Jeremy Hamilton I never said they did
@jahamilton8 жыл бұрын
BubblegumWitch You said that putting the fear of God in people is the same exact thing as what Jihadists are doing. Then Irshad said that Christianity and Islam are practically the same religion. Then you replied back correcting yourself to what he said. This implies that Christians are the same as Jihadists because Muslims are the same as Jihadists.
@TokinTaylor8 жыл бұрын
+Jeremy Hamilton He was emphasizing all Abrahamic religions. I never said all Muslims are jihadists dude, stop crossing my words. We're talking about radicalized Muslims here, not all Muslims in genral.
@uncoveringthelost8 жыл бұрын
So...the answer to "destroy destroy destroy", is "destroy destroy destroy"? Seems a bit illogical.
@Ben-pp5tt8 жыл бұрын
Really? That's how we won WW2.
@uncoveringthelost8 жыл бұрын
Was it?
@Ben-pp5tt8 жыл бұрын
+The Heron Hero lol yes
@uncoveringthelost8 жыл бұрын
+Ben Larsen actually, until the end, the U.S. used a rather tempered approach. Then, in a moment of frustration, they fire bombed Berlin and nuked Japan for no reason. But that was just Germany and Japan issues with other places continue to this day. I think a new approach is logical.
@my-back-yard8 жыл бұрын
Not the way it went down. Lol
@thaalsmythic87318 жыл бұрын
O'Reilly and Colbert are both smart guys. I always learn something when they get together.
@petermatthew50328 жыл бұрын
I've been disagreeing with Bill O'Reilly forever.let's just say I agree with every word he spoke here. Good job Bill!!!
@oscarramirez-nw4uq8 жыл бұрын
This was a good interview, I especially like the way that Stephen Colbert allowed Bill O'Reilly to present his side of the facts. That was a real kind gesture on Stephen' part. O'Reilly is a very knowledgeable man
@suneilkumar8 жыл бұрын
Wow my respect for Bill O Reilly shot up 10x
@suneilkumar8 жыл бұрын
I have no idea what you just said my friend.
@sirfer69698 жыл бұрын
Same here, I found myself feeling really weird agreeing with a lot of what he said.
@maxrey40558 жыл бұрын
Too bad he really doesn't like you.
@FinnaBusanut8 жыл бұрын
When Bill isn't being a troll for the sake of ratings, he actually makes a lot of sense. I totally agree with him here.
@beemerssilverlakestudios98858 жыл бұрын
absolutely one of the best clips I've seen Colbert do. Congrats. Bring on more people that disagree with Stephen for more compelling videos like this. Stephen stands his ground well. Colbert for President!
@FilmArtPhoto8 жыл бұрын
"Now is the time for America to step up" and help its own people, not go to endless war in the Middle East. We aren't taking care of the vets we have now, it is shameful.
@nickwininger4 жыл бұрын
The argument Bill makes concerning the “emotion and history behind guns” is a reason to keep them support their continued use today is torn to shreds when you consider the fact that he doesn’t believe that the history and emotion behind slavery gives anyone a right to feel passionately about race relations today.
@sssssssev8 жыл бұрын
Bill, "the fear of God" is exactly what's driving these people, don't you see the irony?
@KindaRustySocks248 жыл бұрын
Damn that was deep
@oliviakrca8 жыл бұрын
ISIS is giving Muslim extremists the world over a taste of invincibility and immortality because of the destruction in the Levant. We'll never convince fanatics that they're in the wrong but we can make them fear failure by crushing their idols. Now, I don't actually agree that means putting American boots on the ground but that's a whole other debate.
@lynyrdskinyrd8 жыл бұрын
It''s more likely the fear of their own people is what's driving them... they all make each other this way together, islam promotes paranoia and death
@sdean888888 жыл бұрын
terrorists don't fear God, they want to put fear in people who don't want islam.
@dahfighter99148 жыл бұрын
it is a figure of speech.
@BluePiggy8 жыл бұрын
It was nice to see this issue discussed respectfully and intelligently. This is the best I've seen Bill O'Reilly behave, and he actually made some sound arguments. I agree that Stephen Colbert did a great job with this interview, and I'm so glad he urged the audience to listen. I wish this tone could continue permanently in discussions about mass shootings and gun control.
@Zantor1358 жыл бұрын
Holy Shit! I actually agree with O'Reilly. WTF is happening to the world.
@siddgeir13128 жыл бұрын
but, but, but this is the exact same rhetoric was used before Iraq and Bill called it a mistake! how can you not see this?!
@paragon17828 жыл бұрын
Not occuping and it would be nato not just the us. listen to it again he explained it.
@siddgeir13128 жыл бұрын
+Paragon of Growth And sever yet another head of the Hydra. You can't war yourself to peace. NATO, Coalition of the Willing, Axis of Evil, it's all the same talk as before. Billy almost had a point, then he blew it on his v.p. job application interview. Its kind of cute how he assumes isis lives in a historical vacuum tho.
@MrGhosthacked8 жыл бұрын
Its not the same rhetoric. Many of those CNN and NBC and Fox videos are still on youtube. Go rematch them.
@rspainter78968 жыл бұрын
I don't know what he said at the time of the Iraq war, but I do know this is the same kind of rhetoric used to get us into war. We can't "defeat" radical Islam through war. It creates more problems than it solves, in that it solves none. More guns also isn't the solution. Reasonable measures could move us in the right direction. The go to that so for so many, guns don't kill people, people kill people. This is true, which is why we need to do something about who has these weapons. I'm tired of the deflecting away from guns when such tragedies occur, and I'm tired of doing nothing.
@Memberofdoom8 жыл бұрын
+RSPainter You just said alot of things that you believe, but didn't explain why you believe them. Why do you think that we can't defeat radical Islam through war? Why are more guns not the solution? What are these "reasonable measures" that you refer to? This isn't meant as bait; I'm honestly interested in the reasons.
@marrythegaga918 жыл бұрын
How is mental illness not part of the problem??
@luistpuig8 жыл бұрын
all fascists have mental problems, but they are STILL evil!
@maxgorden4998 жыл бұрын
The shooters brain fully worked he didnt have mental illness. He just believed in an ideology that justified what he did. Mentally ill people do things that don't make any sense. What the shooter did made sense to him it was justified by Islam and ISIS in his mind. Mental illness and doing something stupid/wrong are two very different things.
@qones35748 жыл бұрын
Nearly no one donates to mental health research. Or even canvasses for donations. Charity is an incredibly important third wing of disease research. And we choose to stay in the dark ages with mental illness
@Sarah-hr4dz8 жыл бұрын
Because the guy was not white.
@maxgorden4998 жыл бұрын
As I posted above it was not mental illness because the guy was not insane. He simply believed in an ideology (islam) that in his eyes justified what he did.
@frankstoeffler45048 жыл бұрын
Colbert... you so lost this debate....
@EsquilaxM8 жыл бұрын
Wasn't a debate. Was an interview.
@katherinekatiescott26768 жыл бұрын
Why does it have to be a debate? Can't it be a conversation?
@EsquilaxM8 жыл бұрын
***** nope. He asked follow up questions and had O'Reilly generally address other viewpoints while expanding on his own. He wasn't trying to convince O'Reilly, but rather give a way for him to speak both in more detail and more broadly (know that sounds strange but...hope you know what i mean >.>)
@jager34188 жыл бұрын
I love this concept. Get someone with an opposing view and have them explain themselves and then challenge them on the views. I do think it would be a huge benefit to have these talks longer. I would have loved to see a half hour of this or an hour.
@Vapor_Man6508 жыл бұрын
I commend Colbert for having Bill O Reilly on. He's very smart and very straight forward and American needs a no spin no nonsense individual that tells it like it is
@iMaDeMoN20128 жыл бұрын
Bill makes some very intelligent points.
@yme52498 жыл бұрын
O'really is Right Collbert is way off, i think bill taught him.
@rainyday49708 жыл бұрын
It was a discussion. Not every discussion is a "I win, you lose" type of situation.
@-Diamond-Dave-8 жыл бұрын
O'reilly is partially correct, and I am surprised I can admit that, but I can already tell you are a neocon
@HowdyThere888 жыл бұрын
Colbert made some great points as well. And I think they were agreeing more than disagreeing here. The road Bill wants to go down makes some sense but at the same time it it is also faulty.
@ensanesane8 жыл бұрын
I agree, I think Colbert was partially playing devil's advocate to invite better discussion. Though they obviously disagreed on some topics like mental illness being a legitimate factor and the notion of what is effective to kill an opposing, and violent, idea. I don't often like O'Reilly, but he had some good thought provoking ideas here; I'll admit it. I don't think the way to accomplish it is to drag NATO in by declaring war then forcing them to obey the treaties though. There needs to be some discussion. I mean, they haven't officially declared war either and they arguably have more stake in it than the US.
@yme52498 жыл бұрын
NEW YORK TIMES - Islam & Nazisim by RUSSELL SLAYTON www.publishaletter.com/readletter.jsp?plid=62858#.V2V9CCJ1LEo.twitter
@nancymuncy73598 жыл бұрын
Thank you Steve Colbert for treating a conservative with respect! Refreshing to see!
@h2lo7048 жыл бұрын
It's not everybody had guns, it is everybody had a musket... big difference there.
@tacticalultimatum8 жыл бұрын
Yea, it use to be everyone had a musket. Now it's civilians have rifles and the army has: UAV's, tanks, armoured vehicles, autonomous threat destruction platforms and so on.
@longlivenc72358 жыл бұрын
Therefore rendering the reason for the second amendment nonexistent. It was created to enable a revolution by the citizens, which is now impossible. The amendment has no reason not to be abolished, and the only other way to go is to sell tanks to civilians which is fucking inane.
@missbubblegumdrops8 жыл бұрын
The constitution was written very carefully. It is clear we have the right to bear arms for our freedom
@missbubblegumdrops8 жыл бұрын
+Stuffedbird you feel more free in a society that you are not free in?
@longlivenc72358 жыл бұрын
Joe Smith We have the right to bear arms because of our right to revolution. There is no inherent right to own a gun, it has to come with reason. Now that revolution is no longer dependent on our right to bear arms, the second amendment is useless.
@0MVR_08 жыл бұрын
"Everybody had a gun" Less than 5% of the population fought the British.
@thisIsFunnyLolz10 ай бұрын
And two thirds of the population at least early in the war were either loyalists or indifferent to the cause lmao
@0MVR_010 ай бұрын
@@thisIsFunnyLolzO'Reilly would have sided with the English against the Irish Republican Army, sitting happy on a county estate
@allmufasa84778 жыл бұрын
I like how Colbert translates a little bit for the audience and viewers
@n8style8 жыл бұрын
Let's start another never-ending war....faaahhhnntastic *eye-roll*
@onomatopoeia1620038 жыл бұрын
ikr. they have been fighting over there in the middle east for centuries. what's in it for them to stop....
@missbubblegumdrops8 жыл бұрын
No you should just leave terrorists alone. We should never have stopped the nazis either. What a dumb comment
@Enso.8 жыл бұрын
Declared wars have ends. The last time we officially declared war was the last time we won one...that was world war 2. Endless wars come with NDAA policies and ignoring congressional approval.
@joshm.93088 жыл бұрын
If Hillary is elected, that's what we'll get. She wants to take us to war with Iran...although I wouldn't think that Trump would be much better as our next POTUS, either!
@PurushaDesa8 жыл бұрын
+flyingvman1000 Probably why you don't have grieving family members making critical political decisions. (The commenter's detachment in this case is a feature not a bug.)
@lasafrog8 жыл бұрын
Wow. I'm way not into FOX news, but I have to say. O'Reilly really spoke to me here. I was fully expecting to laugh at him when I clicked this video.
@RuthlessBarbarian138 жыл бұрын
Bill certainly reached an age where irrational overtaken logical thinking.
@Riverrly8 жыл бұрын
Good interview with good arguments and good job on letting o'reilly getting his point across
@FlyingGold8 жыл бұрын
Bill really was on his game here. He even got the audience on his side for a moment. Stephen probably thought he was gonna put Bill in his place. Some good tv
@markjharvey8 жыл бұрын
Bill O'Reilly makes more sense each time I listen to him
@Sir_Flopsalot8 жыл бұрын
the passed 1 year I have agreed with bill, before that I agreed with nothing he said. But im going to for the first time agree what he said 100%. Fuck, what kind of world am I living in that I can say that? Seriously, when was Bill the voice of truth, he is so on this whole interview. I disagree with so much of his passed, and then this happens, and one video before this out of at least 60. well done, glad u see the light.
@mr.feelings58908 жыл бұрын
Glad your wakein up bro
@XYxTheOppxJX8 жыл бұрын
+Mr. Boice lmao
@TheMbeagan8 жыл бұрын
You put aside what you've believed or thought you knew, however you want to phrase it, and played out both sides with reason and critical thinking. The real kind of critical thinking, not the lame progressive liberal version, where they feel pre-judgement is real thought.
@theredscourge8 жыл бұрын
Bill has said some irrational things in the past, for sure, but he makes a lot more sense when not just listened to in tiny clips. He is however getting a lot more logical with age it seems. A far more logical Bill is Bill Whittle.
@madnessinisolation8 жыл бұрын
How do you destroy an idea? Well, extremism is an idea of hate. So you fight it with love!
@debbiemarquis32318 жыл бұрын
Evil needs to be destroyed...the whole fuckin world is goin down!
@mshara18 жыл бұрын
Start with the people who invaded Iraq .
@unitedfordc27068 жыл бұрын
Charge bush with war crimes
@iboothby8 жыл бұрын
"We've got to put the fear of God into these people..." I think that might be a big part of the problem.
@eternalending8 жыл бұрын
The 2nd amendment was put in because we were fighting a war on our own land.
@joshduriden5198 жыл бұрын
The US should outlaw alcohol too, drunk driving accounts for nearly 10,000 deaths yearly, about the same as gun deaths due to homicide. Should probably prohibit the sales of high sugar, and high fat foods since diabetes kills about 67,000 a year and the primary cause of type 2 diabetes is obesity. Actually the US should just do away with private vehicle ownership given they cause 30,000 deaths per year.
@samuelsmith35978 жыл бұрын
+Sin SinaT The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles.
@joe62748 жыл бұрын
There's some truth in what you're saying, but with Hitler, for example, it was more complex than just taking guns away. The Nazis essentially "militarized" the citizenry, making sure that the bulk of young men (except for Jews and other groups that were official targets of discrimination) were in regimented groups that could be mobilized on the regime's behalf. The largest, obviously, was the Wehrmacht. But "volunteer" groups like the SA and SS were armed, and the SS was ultimately used to take over all police in Germany, thus ensuring that law enforcement was guided by the "popular" (ie, Hitler's) will. The Nazis were thrilled at the prospect of an armed citizenry -- as long as those citizens were considered ideologically "reliable" and could be regimented/mobilized against groups that Hitler despised.
@winningless8 жыл бұрын
Statistics: 84,258 nonfatal injuries, 11,208 deaths by homicide, 21,175 by suicide. In 72 hours of 93 deaths unrelated to Orlando. Your examples are unoriginal and silly. In recent memory, I can't think of a single case of an angry postal worker going on a rampage inflicting cake induced diabetes. You can't force alcohol and sugar into people the way you can bullets with an AR-15.
@eternalending8 жыл бұрын
Josh Duriden Why not? Alcohol has no positive aspects to it.
@1stsampan8 жыл бұрын
As the gun store clerk said to a customer: "Yes sir, you background check came fine. Now I want to see you eat bacon, or it's no sale".
@chip96498 жыл бұрын
Basically US becomes a police state.
@Gingerjake28 жыл бұрын
Uuhhh, say what? You've been watching too many cheap-to-produce action adventure FICTION MOVIES.
@Luissuarez26508 жыл бұрын
as a liberal gun owner I can agree with Bill
@mshara18 жыл бұрын
Enjoy your mass shootings. Also, I don't believe you're a liberal.
@DaveGamesVT8 жыл бұрын
Liberal here who's for gun rights and thinks "gun control" is stupid and unrealistic. Not every liberal is like you, sorry to be the one to tell you that.
@mshara18 жыл бұрын
I live in Australia. Gun control is not unrealistic. Your vote has no influence in Congress ,as proven in a Princeton study. Whereas corporate lobbying by NRA and others does. Fix that first.
@ronaldbarnett19428 жыл бұрын
iam a conservative and believe assault weapons should be banned to the public. and by the way i have served USAF
@DaveGamesVT8 жыл бұрын
mshara1 You live in Australia. Gun control is realistic. I live in America. It is not. Two completely different places.
@EndingsAreHard8 жыл бұрын
I love how frustrated Stephen is because that's exactly how I'm feeling right now watching this. JfC.
@shona_20235 жыл бұрын
Thoroughly enjoyed this conversation
@merlin39218 жыл бұрын
Hey Colbert, please take in some refugees from Syria, into your own home, and you can shower them with hugs and kisses and there will be peace and happiness for all.
@krispykr33m28 жыл бұрын
Hate crimes....sheesh...thats all evil people do.
@BigBadJerryRogers8 жыл бұрын
But some identifiable groups are more at risk than others. Gay people would be more at risk than the Midwest Stamp and Coin Collectors Society.
@oscarrookie8 жыл бұрын
Unless the Midwest Stamp and Coin Collectors Society stole stamps from letters in-post to further their philatelic agenda!
@danielthrasher17388 жыл бұрын
+RushFlaut Actually, sir, cancer of the human brain is typically referred to as brain cancer. I also believe that a disregard for any system of belief other than your own chosen one seems rather in line with the acts of the very sort of people you are attempting to condemn. Perhaps an advocacy for open-mindedness would be a better approach in the future.
@chrisscottdoes8 жыл бұрын
Bill O'Reilly plays a right wing nut on his own show, but he made some good points here.
@missbubblegumdrops8 жыл бұрын
You've clearly never watch his show.
@Vospi8 жыл бұрын
Well-articulated, not always shouting Bill and serous, patient Stephen. Such a rarity. Thank you
@josephducker41748 жыл бұрын
love watchin these guys duke it out. This is the first time I would say Bill won.
@Nergal1347 жыл бұрын
This wasn't about winning or losing though, it was about having a conversation without letting too much political bias cloud the issue.
@ricosuave6668 жыл бұрын
this interview made me respect bill a lot more
@SCRUFFY5378 жыл бұрын
No matter what liberals may think of Mr. O'Reilly's world view, you'd have to admit that he's one of the most intelligent people on television.
@eagle36766 жыл бұрын
Wait psychopaths who kill always have a mental disorder. What does Bill O'Reilly mean that the guy wasn't mentally ill. Is that "right" only given to white people?
@wuhanclan8 жыл бұрын
I've had huge prejudice against Bill O'Reilly in the past but I actually agree with most of what he said here.
@EcchiTC7 жыл бұрын
"we have to put the fear of god in them" probably one of the most destructive sentences ever created... when both sides are trying to do the same thing... this is why religion even tho has some good guidelines and good morals to live by, is also one the most dangerous thing that mankind ever created.
@hwwwarrior908 жыл бұрын
You kill ideas with better ideas.
@thejbcrazy8 жыл бұрын
Good interview 👍🏿
@KilravockMusicSWS8 жыл бұрын
"You're bringing guns to a drone fight" - Jim Jefferies.
@Icedpyro218 жыл бұрын
i mean we should just treat muslims the way other religions are treated in muslim countries. golden rule
@Theo0x898 жыл бұрын
WE ARE NOT THEM! .... We are not them.
@hyperion10288 жыл бұрын
nah man..they can do that.Not us.For some reason..
@fonaldfuck2028 жыл бұрын
But the thing is muslims influences and philosophies affect the nation in a harmful, violent manner unlike most other religions.
@whygotherehuh8 жыл бұрын
I have been to a Christians friend of mines wedding when he married a Pakistani girl, in Pakistan in a church,, and I have seen many Churches and Hindu temples there myself. Most Muslim countries don't have a problem with other religions, are you talking about Saudi Arabia? because that's the only one I can think of that doesn't allow other fates to be openly practised.
@HellaGust8 жыл бұрын
... you know that's not the golden rule, right? :P
@darrenr498 жыл бұрын
the fk.. i agree with Bill?
@itchyisvegeta8 жыл бұрын
What a lot of people don't realize about a formal declaration of War, it only lasts for 2 years. Once the 2 years are up, Congress has to vote on it again to renew it.
@Xristophero8 жыл бұрын
Destroy evil? No. The Gospel is the antithesis to evil, not violence.
@YBuda1018 жыл бұрын
Great conversation
@thefuturegoat57698 жыл бұрын
This was a great interview between Bill and Stephen. Both guys brought up good points.