Mammals Eating Dinosaurs…How Could This Be???

[@jeremydyck2601]

Another great video, please never stop. It reminded me again that I'm still hoping that they find a human and dinosaur fossil intertwined together, not just to help prove creation, but to hear how the scientists try to explain it.

[@dancingnature]

Well birds are dinosaurs so you might get your wish .

[@creationministriesintl]

@@dancingnature Dinosaurs were eating birds in the fossil record.

[@renatocavalcante8052]

They never will show us if they find it. They are not honest people that you could trust them at such level.

[@luboshcamber1992]

@dancingnature Birds are not dinosaurs. Wake up

[@Harpazo_to_Yeshua]

@@dancingnature Yet your 'scientists' (not) claim dinosaurs went extinct 65,000,000 years ago. Which is it then? 😄Evolutionists are proven wrong multiple times a year, then they keep coming up with more bad excuses to cover up their folly and claim those new imaginations are "scientific theories" that we're supposed to believe? No, thanks. Evolutionism is bogus, atheistic nonsense. 🤷‍♂

[@dorothygrube5314]

At 72 years old I have seen how many scientific facts been overturned. As a nurse - medical/ nursing knowledge has changed

[@dancingnature]

As a nurse at your age you should remember the Sabin live viris ( misspelt on purpose) vax for polio . Sabin used natural selection to evolve a weaker strain that didn’t cause symptoms . Evolution is used in medical research and has been for the past 120 years. Any advanced medical or surgical techniques rely on the fact that we’re related to other organisms!

[@seaknightvirchow8131]

⁠​⁠@@dancingnatureThis isn’t evolution. This has nothing to do with the origin of life or the molecular machinery of the cell. Minor genetic change in an existing life form, notwithstanding viruses being controversial as to whether they are living or nonliving, is acknowledged by everyone but gets us nowhere when it comes to the idea that life came from star dust by chemical action. Saying that we are related to other organisms is an equivocation or an ambiguity of terms which might suggest that we came from fish, amphibians, or monkeys which has never been proven; it is a materialist assumption. In fact, species have boundaries or limitations of change.

[@t222fox4]

I agree! Interestingly the evolution model has been changed hundreds of times and they never have said “we were wrong” they just claim new understanding

[@stevepierce6467]

Yes, some scientifically accepted conclusions have been overturned by......even better scientific conclusions, based on even better evidence. Of course there are the million or so victims of COVID who died believing that medical science is false. As a nurse, where do you stand on that scientific fact?

[@xS146roar]

​@@seaknightvirchow8131 But I seen how scientists changed model of electron proton string and other theories every time

[@loricalass4068]

Oh, this is a real find. I’ve had evolutionists to ask me why we don’t see bunny fossils with dinosaur fossils. Well, as far as I know, human fossils, which are exceedingly rare, are also not found with bunny fossils. (Though I have heard of a fossil of a mammal showing a small dinosaur being digested inside it.) But who cares about the bunnies? Now we have this terrific fossil evidence of a mammal and a dinosaur fighting each other. Too cool. This makes me think of all the Bible antagonists who would say things like so-and-so never existed, and such and such place can’t be found outside of the Bible, and so on. But with further digs, those very places and things have become extremely verified.

[@creationministriesintl]

Dino and humans? That is nothing compared to pre-Cambrian pollen! "Out of order" fossils are very common. And there is good evidence from archaeology that humans and dinosaurs lived together. Out of order fossils: creation.com/precambrian-rabbits-death-knell-for-evolution creation.com/pollen-paradox creation.com/the-fossil-record-and-precambrian-rabbits kzbin.info/www/bejne/jXTIYnWZZtyogKs Dinosaur engravings: creation.com/chinese-camarasaurus creation.com/did-angkor-really-see-a-dinosaur creation.com/concealed-under-carlisle-cathedral-carpet-dinosaurs creation.com/leonardo-da-vinci-dragon

[@loricalass4068]

@@creationministriesintl Thanks!

[@creationministriesintl]

@loricalass4068 You're welcome. The comment you see above was actually in response to someone else who has since been banned from our channel.

[@loricalass4068]

@@creationministriesintl thanks kindly for explaining that. I figured that’s why one of my comments was also deleted along with his responses on that string. Which is totally understandable. So many times the people who think they are being so scientific really just want to get in an argument. Now, I can’t prove it to anyone, but I have felt the Lord telling me in this case that the guy was spiritually brain dead. Of course I prayed for him. I know there is hope since I used to be unquestioning in my belief about evolution. Until I came across creation scientists like y’all. You all are so wonderful. I really appreciate all the research and hard work. And those who support this ministry. What a great gift to the world.

[@thecollector6746]

Human fossils aren't "exceedingling rare", and yes....human fossils have been found alongside "bunnies" and other animals that were extent during the advent of hominoidia(the family of animals humans belong to). There have been human fossils found in the same strata as any dinosaur. You are making sh1t up. Stop.

[@omarvazquez3355]

Finally!!! Creation talk is back! When is Sarfati coming back? He's my favorite 😊❤

[@cliveandersonjr.8758]

I am continually very grateful for Creation Ministries International. May God bless you all tremendously! 🙏

[@jacobnightingale2928]

Great work! The foolish try to prove others wrong, dismiss, control, and remove opposing views. The wise look at all things and trust that truth will dismantle lies. There can be truth without lies, but there can be no lies without truth. Truth doesn't change or bend with time, understanding, or popular opinion. God bless you and thank you for your work!

[@IronMatt]

Thanks, guys! I purchased the Titans book. I look forward to reading it. Good program today 👍

[@Joelbop]

Great vid! Thanks! CMI😁

[@marcelmbssouza5841]

Excellent work GOD bless you and your ministry

[@Reg_The_Galah]

Awesome talk guys, it’s good to see you back at it again

[@WasLostButNowAmFound]

Surprised to see a fellow Singaporean working for CMI.

[@bigdaddyleroy1915]

why?

[@WasLostButNowAmFound]

​@@bigdaddyleroy1915 why not?

[@bigdaddyleroy1915]

@@WasLostButNowAmFound i asked first.

[@WasLostButNowAmFound]

​@@bigdaddyleroy1915 not obligated to tell you why. 😅

[@bigdaddyleroy1915]

@@WasLostButNowAmFound i agree

[@MrSucho-vl7ih]

The first mammals evolved around the Late Triassic period. So finding one with a non-Avian dinosaur is no surprise, they have been thriving for a long time. But you will never find a mammal fossil in Cambrian, Ordovician, Silurian, Devonian, and Permian…

[@nathanluong3063]

man, i think they' re only listening to things that goes their ways

[@mmaimmortals]

Great discussion, and thanks for the resources.

[@kevinpoe8137]

4:26, that museum is just a few miles from my house, I went there the other day with my mom to see the new Permian monsters exhibit, which would have been pre flood, it’s in Jackson, Mississippi

[@stevepierce6467]

How about a visit to a place unaffected by any flood, real or biblically imagined? Read about Ashfall Fossil Beds State Historical Park in northeast Nebraska, also a very devout, very red state. Here are several small flocks of completely intact fossils of now-extinct mammals from about 12,000,000 years ago (about 8 inches on a football field representing the age of the earth) which were covered by ash from a volcanic eruption further west. No dinosaurs, because they died out about 50-60 million years earlier. There is however real concrete fossil evidence that dinosaurs and mammals coexisted back 1/2 billion years ago.

[@jamesrice6096]

Dinosaurs eating stones to assist in digestion. Other creatures do this. Some birds such as chickens eat rocks, then the food is ground by these rocks in the gizzard. ...chickens did not come from dinosaurs.

[@ericjohnston7663]

Soooo....badgers have always been badass....rock on badgers

[@theseedistheword3603]

If they found human skeletons with dinosaurs, do you think they'd tell the world?

[@johnglad5]

​@kattykitters5310Footprints of humans and dinos were found together in Texas. Some were destroyed days later by those who knew their careers of telling lies were over.

[@Barbutt]

@kattykitters5310 Of course they wouldn’t, just like they’re not broadcasting finding blood cells and other organic things in dinosaur fossils supposedly 165 million years old. Evidence of such things is constantly discarded and suppressed to maintain our current secular paradigm… even to the point of destroying evidence.

[@johnglad5]

@hylaherping9180 A series of left right tracks of feet with 5 toes. Luckily a few were saved before they were destroyed.

[@johnglad5]

@@hylaherping9180 Time to take a few minutes and do your own research on the internet.

[@jacobbooker8227]

Love this! amazing

[@creationministriesintl]

Thank you!!

[@JesusistheonetrueGod]

The devil is always crafting new lies, but his lies are alwaya unravelled by God's word.

[@stevepierce6467]

Now, if only some god could actually reveal him/her/itself to us and actually impart their word to us.

[@JesusistheonetrueGod]

@@stevepierce6467 If only steve pierce would reply to my comment.

[@Watchman-At-The-Gate]

Fighting??? they was clinging to whatever they could while drowning. just research lifeguards and how people who are drowning will climb all on you...

[@mmaimmortals]

I get the impression it was scavenging, not fighting. Interrupted by a sediment flow, perhaps.

[@creationministriesintl]

@@mmaimmortals The published paper explains why it was not scavenging.

[@j.k1032]

Five types of grasses that we would recognize today existed between 100 and 66 million years.

[@dancingnature]

Simple, mammals eat birds all the time

[@Tarbtano]

"Mammals didn't live with dinosaurs!" -Said no paleontologist ever for decades

[@anilramlogan8737]

how did the fossils of the mammal fighting the dinosaur remain perfectly ,why werent they moved by the flood waters

[@statesman6379]

It was a catastrophic flood, greater than any flood we've ever witnessed. They were quickly buried underneath a bunch of mud as well.

[@mmaimmortals]

They were moved. Highly unlikely they died exactly where they were found. If they did, it would be because they were inundated by a sediment flow which was probably moved by water, not just rushing water alone.

[@stevepierce6467]

A) Floods happen all the time but do not affect every area. B) many animals died and were buried by other causes not related to floods, such as the several herds of now extinct animals buried by volcanic ash at Ashfall Fossil Beds State Historical Park in northeast Nebraska.

[@mmaimmortals]

@@haggismcbaggis9485 Evaporites are only evaporites if they actually formed by evaporation. What you're calling evaporites likely formed by some other process or a combination of processes that doesn't rely on "top down" evaporation.

[@mmaimmortals]

@@stevepierce6467 Local floods happen all the time. But the geologic record is a huge volume of formations that are marine in nature and nothing at all like any local flood. There are literally thousands of feet thick formations of limestone, a purely marine sediment, and they are often well above sea level, as in thousands of feet above sea level. No local flood can do that.

[@mrsanity]

You're a mammal, and last time you went to KFC, you ate part of a theropod dinosaur....................

[@THall-vi8cp]

Humans are mammals. Humans eat chickens Chickens are birds. Birds are dinosaurs. Mammals eat dinosaurs.

[@HanseaticConsortium]

@@THall-vi8cp Birds are reptiles?

[@THall-vi8cp]

Under modern cladistic taxonomy, birds are grouped with turtles, crocodilians, and dinosaurs (being the last living dinosaurs). So yes. Taxonomically speaking, they could be called reptiles.

[@TickedOffPriest]

If coelacanth live alongside humans today, why are they not buried together? Maybe because they do not live together.

[@mmaimmortals]

@@23Raind What does “younger layer” even mean? There is no apparent sign (concrete physical evidence) of any deep time in any geological layer. The only “apparent” deep time is what people imagine from scratching out formulas or pretending evolution is real. So any given layer could have been laid down within minutes of the previous one and you would have no idea how much time has passed.

[@mmaimmortals]

@kattykitters5310 There are countless geologic formations impossible to form in a one year flood event. -Agreed. It’s a straw man to assume any given formation was from the Flood if informed creationists don’t think it was. Things like angular unconformities which take multiple geologic steps requiring millions of years each to form. -Has anyone run a million year long experiment to validate this as absolute fact? Or do people just claim this without testing at all so that they can demonstrate how unfalsifiable evolution really is? In reality, angular unconformities are clear geological evidences that something catastrophic caused them. Namely, the very flat contacts that lack any signs of deep time weathering, along with the lack of differential erosion between layers of differing hardnesses. Multiple layers can form simultaneously in a single flow, uplift takes seconds, not tens of thousands to millions of years, and subsequent debris flows can create planation surfaces in seconds to minutes. This can be replicated experimentally, whereas millions of years cannot. Or 180 degree switchback meanders incised into solid rock with thousand foot vertical sides. See Goosenecks State Park on the San Juan River in Utah. The switchback meanders couldn't have been carved when the strata was soft because soft mud will slump, not form vertical walls. Water moving fast enough to carve quickly through rock would blast straight channels, not meandering switchbacks. -You clearly don’t understand hydrodynamics to say such things. And you clearly haven’t reviewed the physical evidence at Gooseneck very well to be offering up either this or uniformitarian solutions as the only possible explanations. The only way the Goosenecks formed is by a slowly flowing meandering river which gradually eroded the existing hard rock. -Well, at least you didn’t say millions of years this time. Because I’m pretty sure no one has run that experiment for millions of years either. After looking at the pictures of Gooseneck, it does not appear to be cut in soft rock, it does not appear to be cut in hard rock very quickly either. But it also does not appear to be cut that way over long ages (deep time) by a “slow meandering river” either. What it actually appears to be is perhaps a post Flood series of episodic surges. Like several annual high rise flows from very wet weather. This is apparent in the numerous steps going up the walls of the river’s sides. Had deep time been involved, those very vertical looking sides would have been obliterated. Erosion is fastest where surfaces are more vertical. So once again, there isn’t a shred of apparent deep time in these formations as you’ve proposed.

[@rtan8707]

@@23Raind why do different fish species have to be found together in a fossil just for creation to be proven? And how are you sure that the coelacanth found is 65mil yrs old. Where do you base that conclusion? Were you alive 65mil yrs ago to verify it or do you have a time machine? Can you also explain how cave drawings of sauropods from different locations came about? How about a stegosaurus carving in ankor wat?

[@mmaimmortals]

@kattykitters5310 “Go ahead show us...” Have you watched any of John MacKay’s experiments?

[@mmaimmortals]

@kattykitters5310 “...horse hockey...” Katty, I lived in Arizona for a while. They have rivers / creeks / ravines that look like the erosion in Gooseneck SP. I recognized the steps that cut in and out from local geology in Arizona. People who have lived there a long time have seen those formations change and erode over the years to become very much like Gooseneck.

[@CenturianCornelious]

This is not the only such case.

[@creationministriesintl]

We mentioned this in the video.

[@steffanjansenvanvuuren3257]

Do you have anything on human fossils?

[@creationministriesintl]

Yes, we have a video about human fossils. See, Where are all the human fossils? - kzbin.info/www/bejne/oHmulXZmo8R4gMk

[@ericjohnston7663]

Palm trees are grass

[@sandyish227]

The Neanderthals and other anthropods lived same time as dinosaurs not that hard to understand. MODERN man didn't show up till about 300bc most dinosaurs were gone by then

[@MrSucho-vl7ih]

What is an “anthropod”? And no, Neanderthals did not live with non-avian dinosaurs.

[@guylelanglois6642]

Amazing how many times evolutionists have had to change their fairy tales, but the good book has yet to be proven false by any archeologist or geologist.

[@stevepierce6467]

Strange how the bible has never been proven true by anyone at all. At least scientists have the humility to accept that they do not have the full picture and are willing to revise their conclusions as new evidence appears. This is an honest scholarly attitude not found in creationists.

[@coolhawk2003]

Everything millions. Crazy guessing. Never 56678987 years ago its 20 million to 80 million. Lol

[@Constantin_Sime]

"MILLIONS of years ago" - the evolutionists' "magic formula" which not only makes the impossible possible, but it even makes it CERTAIN...😉...

[@coolhawk2003]

@@Constantin_Sime time is there magic. Lot here and little there, few estimates, then add about. Poof

[@steffanjansenvanvuuren3257]

Amen

[@stevepierce6467]

How could this be? Because mammals and dinosaurs lived at the same time.

[@itsamystery5279]

Mammals evolved around 200 MYA. The last non-avian dinosaurs went extinct 66 MYA. That means mammals and dinosaur co-existed for over 130 MY. Many mammals are carnivores who eat other animals. The largest mammals were a lot bigger than the smallest dinosaurs, especially juvenile ones. Why is it surprising some dinos ended up being eaten by mammals?

[@richiejourney1840]

Not what I was taught in the public school system. I was taught the dinosaurs were extinct when the age of mammals came. But that was long ago. Later in life I was taught by “science” that there was a period of time they did co-exist, but the Dino’s were wiped out by a meteor and ONLY the mammals survived…hmmm…??? If we accept alligators and such as dinosaurs then, shouldn’t dinosaurs still be co-existing with mammal’s? You mention “evolved”. I infer you to mean Modern Darwinian Evolution by way of Abiogenesis? If so, can you present enough sufficient evidence and reason to change my mind to that position?

[@Mrclean431]

Ok

[@bigdaddyleroy1915]

you whole comment is a lie because earth is only a little over 6000 years old. don't pedal your propaganda here.

[@dadsonworldwide3238]

Because 50 years ago when i was in school learning real darwinism none of what you just said was taught. I watched evolutionary mythology itself rewriting every lie over and over . Things like this has to be found in china because the last 100 years in the west it would go extinct 😊

[@owenduck]

All of that has been proven wrong by the discovery of unfossilised soft tissue in dinosaur fossils.

[@shireecox122]

Are there any human fossils?

[@twisted_fo0l]

Yes, plenty! Depending on what you classify as human, (h.sapiens) or our extinct closest ancestors. There are 8 sites that contain early anatomically modern humans, and assorted other cousin sites.

[@chrispelatari2262]

🔺🦕 fact: dinosaurs built the pyramids

[@RealMerryMary]

I understand getting rid of carnivores and omnivores, but why would we as humans kill off animals that aren’t going to hurt us unless we’re eating them? So did people eat dinosaurs? Because otherwise it doesn’t make sense to me why they all became extinct

[@pigzcanfly444]

Many were obviously very dangerous and could potentially be a threat to tribal people's. If you look into the various folklore around the globe the vast majority have detailed depictions of monstrous lizards that were fought to protect their people. Often times they are called dragons or a derivation of the word but either way the resemblances are uncanny as they are shown on pottery, carved stone walls and written about in Chinese literature from thousands of years ago. There was even a royal dragon feeder for the Dragon Emporers dragons. Food for thought.

[@creationministriesintl]

Hunting alone might not explain the demise of dinosaurs. In this video, we discuss several possible contributing reasons, including a discussion of why the meteoroid extinct theory doesn't work. kzbin.info/www/bejne/fJuzaX6gqp6Uq5I

[@stevepierce6467]

There is plenty of evidence that some catastrophe led to a mass extinction of dinosaurs about 60+ million years ago, possibly a meteor impact, or massive volcano eruption.

[@Yuyup7334]

So the evidence tells that mamals are not evolved from reptiles.

[@Yuyup7334]

@@hylaherping9180 Well, but that being the case, taking it seriously, the theory of evolution then, esp. at the evolution chain-line of fish to amphibians to *reptiles to mamals* becomes unfalsifiable; and hence it follows that the theory fails from being a bonafide explanation for the existance of variety of living beings on earth at present and falls into the category of just *a believe.*

[@kevinrtres]

Of course the evolutionists will say that it took millions of years for the mammal to unearth the dino so it can start to eat it. Or something similarly nonsensical.

[@wanderschlosser1857]

Mammals exist for about 300 million years, they shared Earth for quite a long time. No need to wait for them to unearth anything

[@twisted_fo0l]

Love the strawman

[@kevinrtres]

@@twisted_fo0lYup! Psalm 14:1 applies.

[@stevepierce6467]

Nothing nonsensical; we have fossil evidence that mammals and dinos lived together nearly half a billion years ago.

[@franciscomelendeze]

Most scientists know that mammals have been living in the cretaceous if not before. I knew that as a kid in the 90s from dinosaur books and Nat Geo magazines. Obviously if you only looked at dino books for small children then you would know this

[@ricklamb772]

Mammals eat snake,Alligator.all types of fish from rhe bible flood days

[@markstone5593]

If you are going to make up your own theories you need to back it up with scientific evidence and have it peer reviewed, otherwise its all false.🤦‍♂🤦‍♂

[@creationministriesintl]

You know that this video is discussing a peer-reviewed secular journal publication right?

[@markstone5593]

@@creationministriesintl peer review by who?

[@georg7120]

Of course scientists laugh at creationists, because they even twist the bible to support their claims.

[@igotnoname4557]

It happens every day, it's called Kentucky Fried Chicken. You ppl....🤣🤣🤣🤣😅😂..you do realize that dinosaur is one of most of our primary proteins to this day, right? Evolution says that every creature is every creature that led up to it. That means that you are a fish. It doesn't mean that you are a dinosaur, though. See the difference? Cows aren't but birds were though. That makes them dinosaurs, still.