Curious questions as Bhutan PM denies China intrusion, cites Doklam, as Thimphu-Beijing talk borders

[@ziplock8316]

When our own pmo doesn't have the balls to accept Chinese intrusion in public, why should Bhutan's leader be expected to align with our interests.

[@rajx7120]

Don't twist the PM's words. Intrusion means crossing official borders. That didn't happen. But in the disputed overlapping area of the LAC, China built bunkers in violation of 1993 and 1996 agreements.

[@ezs855]

China wants to develop relations with Bhutan, but Bhutan is controlled by India

[@Rhonny.rhodes]

Bhutan PM and Indian PM both singing the same raga! While China still intruding in both Indian and Bhutanese territories!!

[@eyteh9814]

Bhutan is an independent sovereign country not a colony of India.

[@metalhead1899]

As a Bhutanese citizen I would request my Indian friends to not get too sensitive. Bhutan has always been loyal towards India and we are the only country in South Asia to not have any diplomatic ties with China. To this date zero Chinese investment in Bhutan. Bhutan will do what’s in their interest.

[@dreamworld2814]

Ofcourse you should do what is in your interest but the way of China's intrusion... it's a big treat for Indian cuz we are watching Tibet 2....,

[@metalhead1899]

@@dreamworld2814 respect your view. Bhutan has been independent since the 7 century and starting from Portuguese priests to Japanese monk have documented it in their journals. Rest of the world was unaware as Bhutan was self isolated. The British East India tried but the Bhutanese stood firm thus ceding parts of Duars and Cooch Behar. I feel Bhutanese will hold on to their independence irrespective of their size.

[@sujanthapa7289]

Poor bhutanese even can't zoom in google map and see chinese village inside bhutan . Do border agreement with China fast or bhutan will be like tibet one day.

[@saanjanibaar8085]

​​@@metalhead1899 Such a loyal lapdog!

[@shootingstar8685]

@@sujanthapa7289 what u ll know about bhutan...first care abt your poor country nepal Chinese soon Chinese ll take you...bhutan has never been taken by other country..small but best

[@vbiotonicmascot6099]

For all those who say Bhutan must join India...You have no right to force anyone to merge.. They are a sovereign country and we must respect them treat as equals and should not ask them to join India. But as a friend we must protect them from expansionist CCP.

[@pardeeptandon]

Manu Wadi BJP / RSS does not believe " ALL MEN ARE BORN EQUAL"; they do not treat Bhutan as an EQUAL sovereign nation.

[@surajbiradar9827]

Who is saying that?

[@vbiotonicmascot6099]

@@surajbiradar9827 Some lunatics in comment section.

[@nagemepola7972]

Bhutan's premier may be following the approach of Indian leadership conceding its territory to adversary. What happened in Galwan valley is still afresh wherein our PM said nobody intruded nor no territory is captured by China but truth is very well known. This shows how China is taming its neighbour and India is not exception here.

[@33-arnavsaroj71]

Lmao chinese bots 😂everywhere

[@himanshuvikramsingh3391]

What happened in galwan just go and asked the Chinese they even scared in dream by just knowing that Indian army is coming

[@439437]

@@himanshuvikramsingh3391 😂Are you a psychiatrist? Has China asked you to cure nightmares where he is afraid of Indians?

[@pardeeptandon]

@@himanshuvikramsingh3391: They have built that road and reached the targeted destination, albeit by taking a longer route.

[@anttman41]

​​​@@himanshuvikramsingh3391dude that's what our news channels spread,yes PLA lost many soldiers that day but for CCP they're nothing,they got bloody nose in galwan but we still ended up conceding territory in form of buffer zone. India isn't really prepared for a full scale war that's the reason our govt downplays every incident just to buy more time,we alone r never gonna catch up with Chinese military .

[@MrReaperish]

The closest Analogy to the China Bhutan issue would be like a Game of chess where one is backing his Pieces and the other is advancing his pieces. Lotay Tshering may feel that by conceding and taking few steps back is the best thing to do, but that is just going to bring more Military presence in the valleys of Bhutan. Just like how the King, queen, Bishop & Knight are cornered and there is absolutely nothing that can be done while the other side is advancing and capturing more territory.

[@yorisingrango9837]

Bhutan's monarch is incredibly corrupt and cowards. They always feared that India would take away its sovergnity or territory just like Sikkim, they never bother looking North and are now in shameful retreating tact hoping to pacify/appease a devouring land hungry entity.

[@molsimathew2341]

Diplomats must be diplomatic. Jaishankar's one liners may be cheered back home but, is UNDEPLOMATIC. It only made enemies worldwide. PM, EAM statements emboldened China. Hence, the surrender by SURENDER

[@studytime2570]

any content related to India-China issue exists. ccp bots in the comment section: we are summoned 🇨🇳

[@Dipps]

Abey gadhe , every alternate opinion in not a CCP bot. Are u a Bjp bought ?

[@maha-madpedo-gayphukumber1533]

Why the Muslim Brotherhood is Becoming a Growing Threat in India Pro-India politicians, both in India and abroad, are becoming increasingly concerned about the activities and future goals of the Muslim Brotherhood in India. While the Muslim Brotherhood is an internationally-recognized “non-violent” Islamist group, it does have indirect links to armed groups and wishes to change the current global hegemony-which is dominated by the U.S., U.K., and other Western nations-into Dar al-Islam, meaning that they wish to transform it into an Islamic land and force people to convert to Islam. The ultimate objective of the Muslim Brotherhood, as espoused by the group since the days of its founder Hassan al-Banna in the 1920s, is to adopt a political position of jihad against non-Muslims. The group has a vast international propaganda network and has spawned numerous militant leaders around the world, such as Abdullah Yusuf Azzam, a staunch follower of Al-Banna, who, in 1984, ignited the major Islamist foreign fighter flow to fight the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. By the time Azzam was killed in 1989, he had mentored Osama bin Laden, the founder of Al-Qaeda. Indeed, Bin Laden later said Brotherhood ideas were key to the formation of his ideology. The Brotherhood’s designation as a “non-violent” group relies on a literalist interpretation of its behavior, and requires ignoring its connections to militancy. In India, for example, the Brotherhood’s local versions have exacerbated inter-communal discord and created chaos on the streets with protests against the Indian government. These Brotherhood and Brotherhood-derived groups on the Subcontinent insist that the foundations of the Indian Constitution-which include the pillars of secularism, democracy, and nationalism-are anti-Islamic, and work to undermine these foundations in India, primarily by trying to provoke a religious civil war between Indian Muslims and Hindus. The Brotherhood’s vision for toppling the Indian government, creating Dar al-Islam in India, and cultivating revolt in Kashmir is also not exactly “non-violent”. Two prominent Brotherhood offshoot groups in India are the Popular Front of India (PFI) (PFI) and the National Women’s Front (NWF). The PFI was recently banned in India, which has led to something of a resurgence of an older terrorist-designated group, the Students’ Islamic Movement of India (SIMI), which works alongside domestic extremists like the Indian Mujahideen (IM), while receiving external funding from the Qatar-Turkey-Pakistan (“QTP”) axis, and having links with the Pakistani-controlled jihadist ecosystem in Afghanistan that includes the Taliban and Al-Qaeda. The outside support for Islamist militancy in India is important, but the domestic sources of support are crucial to understand. The Brotherhood’s desire to create civil strife to destabilize India and bring down the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi is being abetted financially by Indian opposition parties, according to sources. There are some who see the Muslim Brotherhood’s recent upsurge in India as primarily resulting from Indian politicians trying to use this dangerous group as a weapon to defeat Modi’s rule. This would not be completely unprecedented: there were Indian politicians who exploited the Naxalite (Communist) terrorist-insurgency as a political weapon against the government of the day, for example, a far worse situation. There are roughly as many Muslims in India as there are in Pakistan, a nominally Islamic state, and Muslims in India-unlike in Pakistan-have the freedom to take an active role in politics. There are legal mechanisms for parties to collaborate to remove Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The apparent sly support of a number of Indian politicians for the Brotherhood is, therefore, highly irresponsible. The Brotherhood does not just want to replace the current government; it wants to overthrow the entire ruling system, especially the secularism, but also the democracy and nationalism, because the Brotherhood sees these things as destructive to Islam. A significant motive for the Muslim Brotherhood resuming its activities in India is that as the country becomes a rising power it is drawing closer to the U.S. and could soon pose a major threat to the anti-Western bloc in South and Southeastern Asia, which is backed by China. That is why this alliance, primarily operating through Pakistan, is supporting the Muslim Brotherhood in India, hoping to use the 204 million Muslims in India to provoke civil strife against Hindus to hamper India’s rise. The Muslim population in India is the third largest Muslim population in the world, and the concern of Indian politicians and security agencies is that if the Muslim Brotherhood’s roots are strengthened in India, it will become increasingly difficult to govern the country. In a situation of disorder, it would make Indian Muslims more susceptible to being recruited by the Brotherhood and other international terrorist groups.

[@JohnSmith-vn8dm]

Because they feel threatened. Just like the US, China is a peaking power due to demographic and economic issues. When China's expansionism in the Pacific is frustrated and they fail to invade Taiwan, where do you think they will look next? It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize India will be a target. Through history, rising and falling Great Powers have always been able to form alliances and work together. Japan and Britain managed to do this around 1900, Prussia and Britain in the 1850s as well. But there is one case where this has failed, where a rising power has always faced conflict with the existing one. That case is when they share a border and compete for spheres of influence. The Russo-Japanese war and the Franco-Prussian war are examples of this. India should look at the full spectrum of history and not get tunnel vision on colonialism, whether we are talking about India, Tibet, or any other country as a victim. There is no question that era is over, and India will be the next rising power if it plays its cards right.

[@yomamasohot6411]

@@JohnSmith-vn8dm It will be the next rising power irrespective of what US or China does. It's not like the US have a choice when it comes to China.

[@619ry7]

Most of them are paxtani

[@tsheringleki5581]

Yes are right sir.. I am as Bhutanese citizn very worrisome about Chinas intention of territories graps

[@alpha_soul_0001]

Yeah,I think it's a game move,like if india involves somewhere else with china so that the india-bhutan border could be safe,as it is not possible to fight at every conflict point,this may be a reason according to my analysis. Some people are taking it on another level but I trust the indian-bhutani bond.❤

[@SuyashSharma8]

Sir pls todha jaldi upload kr diya kre. I have been waiting for cut the clutter since 10 pm. Sona bhi rahta h 😅😅😅😅

[@tanveerpatel7605]

yes he upload very late

[@shogoal]

😂

[@HarmanHundal01]

This is an English channel. Please speak English so that our south indian and north eastern friends can understand us.

[@HarmanHundal01]

@@shubh1754 Imagine someone coming here and starting to talk in Telugu. Spoils the experience for everyone else. Hope it enters your thick skull now

[@Dr.SyedSaifAbbasNaqvi]

​@@HarmanHundal01 Blah blah blah..

[@Cellpeg]

India should respect what Bhutan is saying, this is a bilateral matter between Bhutan and China.

[@invisible6646]

Yes china takes Bhutan land becouse it land between china and Bhutan and india should not interfere and damage force and assests wait till they reach doklam no need to jump into Bhutan issue if they don't need. Let them define their distany

[@metalhead1899]

Another addition to what the Global Times has written, the author has fully researched and written which India cannot deny. Her point of view is not important but the history and data is 100 percent correct.

[@kalebj7001]

Even Modiji said no Chinese army personnel entered Indian territory...when the Galwan killings happened.. so it's most probably the same response by the Bhutan PM to keep his name floating among his citizens

[@timepass6774]

Clown he said no Chinese Soldier enter means capture India. And fight happen on Boarder not in India.

[@kalebj7001]

@@timepass6774 lol.. the video is available on KZbin kindly go and watch his statement before coming here to blindly defend his slippery tongue

[@timepass6774]

@@kalebj7001 clown do you even Know LOC not come under any Country Territory and Chinese try to cross it and then Clash between Indian and Chinese Soldier happened and in the end Indian forces able to protect Border by not allowing Chinese Soldier to enter in India, and now you anti nationals disrespecting Army.

[@kalebj7001]

@@timepass6774 🤦‍♂️ u are showing ur ignorance yet again.. the Prime minister said no Chinese PLA entered...does that mean Our Jawans tresspassed beyond the LoC and got killed?? Talk sense, simply don't defend bs for the sake of defending... This is why there were two contradicting statements.. one from the Defence ministry and other being Modiji's infamous no one came 😶

[@timepass6774]

@@kalebj7001 do you even read my reply or you are just clown 🤡 I clearly mentioned LOC not come under any country Territory and Chinese try to cross it but then our army Stop them before crossing LOC. Clown 🤡

[@sevenchakra5548]

India's jealousy towards China, its hatred towards Pakistan and its bullying attitude towards Nepal, Bhutan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh will eventually bring its demise.

[@priyashmukherjee]

*CUBA, MEXICO, UKRAINE ALSO USED SAID THE SAME THING. NOW WHAT?*

[@ibrahimmir3801]

​@@priyashmukherjeeyou are not the world premiere superpower with a world reserve currency, wake up please.

[@malala6750]

China: No intrusion Bhutan: No Intrusion India: Intrusion, Intrusion, Intrusion !!!!! 😂😂😂

[@mainhoopmchaiwalamodi9596]

surrender Modi said koi bhi bharat ki seema me chinese nhi ghusa

[@edison6207]

Just like no intrusion it was in Tibet

[@FullHD-ng2mg]

Love the way SG explain His style of expressing is extra ordinary. Listeners get engrossed into the story

[@JonKino828]

It is, afterall, a story, not based on facts. If Bhutan said the 10 villages are not in their territory, what right does it give India to accuse otherwise? Why is India meddling in other nation's affairs?

[@gurwindersingh-mv6ie]

😅😊😅😅

[@gurwindersingh-mv6ie]

😊

[@gurwindersingh-mv6ie]

😅

[@gurwindersingh-mv6ie]

😊😅😅😅😅😊😅

[@sdb3607]

Bhutan is a colonial country for India and it is a fact, whether you agree or not.

[@nsevv]

Just like how the autonomous region of Tibet is a colonial country of China. It was a colony of Manchurian Dynasty and now china claim Manchu colonies as part of china colonies. Only difference is India still treat bhutan as a country unlike the way china treat the colony of tibet.

[@vbiotonicmascot6099]

No india respect sovereignty of Bhutan

[@libshastra]

I believe Bhutan will likely move closer to India as the Chinese engage in land grabs along their border. The border talks would have likely been a way for Bhutan to explore it's options against incursions. CCP is very much an existential threat for Bhutan. BTW Doklam is a nightmare for anyone defending, it sits on a valley and both India and Bhutan control the heights. It is the exact opposite situation along far eastern Arunachal Pradesh like Wallong.

[@saanjanibaar8085]

Yeah Bhutan will move closer to India to become another Sikkim. Today some of Nepalese territory, tomorrow entire Nepal and that's how india occupies it's neighbours territory. India is the biggest threat for its smaller neighbours.

[@stkstk9118]

Bhutan 🇧🇹 Will Be Forced 2 Make Deal With China 🇨🇳 As They See Clearly Modi Ji Blind Denial Of Occupation Of Indian Territory In LADAK

[@rajx7120]

​@@saanjanibaar8085 Sikkim is the fastest growing state in India. They benefited from being part of India. As they don't have to worry about anyone invading them. And Sikkim has good percentage of Hindu Nepalis, who were discriminated in the past. All that stopped. Whereas, Bhutan expelled Hindus. Yet India went and defend their border, with Indian soldiers.

[@shubhikapant5385]

​@@saanjanibaar8085 bro we Don't want your country we have enough population we are not china seriously please focus on developing your own country.

[@saanjanibaar8085]

@@rajx7120 It sounds similar how Kashmir is also developing by Indians but over the graves of Kashmiris.

[@gyalpot]

Bhutan is one of the 5 fingers of Tibet that China wants to control and occupy. And does not care about Bhutan's sovereign status nor its UN membership. At this time China's attempt to dialogue with Bhutan is only a ploy to antagonize India. Trying to stay neutral while losing territory to China is a game Tibet played and lost - and there is a lesson for Bhutan here.

[@pam4840]

What happened to to part 2 on khalistan episode?

[@atulkumar-ii2mf]

It is the same SG like our prime minister said no intrusion on Indian border.

[@surendrabarsode8959]

Shekhar gives lots of details but at the end, there is no conclusion! Or is this how it is going to be like this for Bhutan, a landlocked country sandwiched between the two huge, powerful countries? Bhutan can make any territorial adjustment on its northern border but nothing on its western and eastern, without acquiescence from India. India has no manipulative designs on Bhutan unlike that of China's behavior with Sri Lanka, Pakistan and others. Bhutanese know this and if not, they better know it.

[@branduncensored]

For conclusions and verdicts, Godi media is the best!

[@maha-madpedo-gayphukumber1533]

Why the Muslim Brotherhood is Becoming a Growing Threat in India Pro-India politicians, both in India and abroad, are becoming increasingly concerned about the activities and future goals of the Muslim Brotherhood in India. While the Muslim Brotherhood is an internationally-recognized “non-violent” Islamist group, it does have indirect links to armed groups and wishes to change the current global hegemony-which is dominated by the U.S., U.K., and other Western nations-into Dar al-Islam, meaning that they wish to transform it into an Islamic land and force people to convert to Islam. The ultimate objective of the Muslim Brotherhood, as espoused by the group since the days of its founder Hassan al-Banna in the 1920s, is to adopt a political position of jihad against non-Muslims. The group has a vast international propaganda network and has spawned numerous militant leaders around the world, such as Abdullah Yusuf Azzam, a staunch follower of Al-Banna, who, in 1984, ignited the major Islamist foreign fighter flow to fight the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. By the time Azzam was killed in 1989, he had mentored Osama bin Laden, the founder of Al-Qaeda. Indeed, Bin Laden later said Brotherhood ideas were key to the formation of his ideology. The Brotherhood’s designation as a “non-violent” group relies on a literalist interpretation of its behavior, and requires ignoring its connections to militancy. In India, for example, the Brotherhood’s local versions have exacerbated inter-communal discord and created chaos on the streets with protests against the Indian government. These Brotherhood and Brotherhood-derived groups on the Subcontinent insist that the foundations of the Indian Constitution-which include the pillars of secularism, democracy, and nationalism-are anti-Islamic, and work to undermine these foundations in India, primarily by trying to provoke a religious civil war between Indian Muslims and Hindus. The Brotherhood’s vision for toppling the Indian government, creating Dar al-Islam in India, and cultivating revolt in Kashmir is also not exactly “non-violent”. Two prominent Brotherhood offshoot groups in India are the Popular Front of India (PFI) (PFI) and the National Women’s Front (NWF). The PFI was recently banned in India, which has led to something of a resurgence of an older terrorist-designated group, the Students’ Islamic Movement of India (SIMI), which works alongside domestic extremists like the Indian Mujahideen (IM), while receiving external funding from the Qatar-Turkey-Pakistan (“QTP”) axis, and having links with the Pakistani-controlled jihadist ecosystem in Afghanistan that includes the Taliban and Al-Qaeda. The outside support for Islamist militancy in India is important, but the domestic sources of support are crucial to understand. The Brotherhood’s desire to create civil strife to destabilize India and bring down the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi is being abetted financially by Indian opposition parties, according to sources. There are some who see the Muslim Brotherhood’s recent upsurge in India as primarily resulting from Indian politicians trying to use this dangerous group as a weapon to defeat Modi’s rule. This would not be completely unprecedented: there were Indian politicians who exploited the Naxalite (Communist) terrorist-insurgency as a political weapon against the government of the day, for example, a far worse situation. There are roughly as many Muslims in India as there are in Pakistan, a nominally Islamic state, and Muslims in India-unlike in Pakistan-have the freedom to take an active role in politics. There are legal mechanisms for parties to collaborate to remove Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The apparent sly support of a number of Indian politicians for the Brotherhood is, therefore, highly irresponsible. The Brotherhood does not just want to replace the current government; it wants to overthrow the entire ruling system, especially the secularism, but also the democracy and nationalism, because the Brotherhood sees these things as destructive to Islam. A significant motive for the Muslim Brotherhood resuming its activities in India is that as the country becomes a rising power it is drawing closer to the U.S. and could soon pose a major threat to the anti-Western bloc in South and Southeastern Asia, which is backed by China. That is why this alliance, primarily operating through Pakistan, is supporting the Muslim Brotherhood in India, hoping to use the 204 million Muslims in India to provoke civil strife against Hindus to hamper India’s rise. The Muslim population in India is the third largest Muslim population in the world, and the concern of Indian politicians and security agencies is that if the Muslim Brotherhood’s roots are strengthened in India, it will become increasingly difficult to govern the country. In a situation of disorder, it would make Indian Muslims more susceptible to being recruited by the Brotherhood and other international terrorist groups.

[@violetsarelavender]

He isn't the one who is making any policies. How can he draw any conclusions? It is wait and see.

[@Red.bulldozer3]

Bhutanese are taking Modi as an example in dealing with mighty china. Despite losing some 2000 sq km indian land to china in 2020, Modi proudly said no chinese troops in indian soil.

[@aakarshjha1633]

They came again in Tawang.returned with bloody noses🤣,cry ccp bot

[@rajx7120]

By Indian soil, he meant confirmed Indian territory. Clashes happened in areas of overlapping claims, where they were treaty bound to not build any bunkers. And we did succed in getting out of no man's land in Pangong and Galwan.

[@yomamasohot6411]

@@rajx7120 You are a shame to this country.

[@hawkingdawking4572]

​@@rajx7120 Since when Ladakh, Sikkim and south Tibet (tawang) are Indian territory? They are Budhist areas populated by Himalayan tribes.

[@niteeshsingh3466]

@@hawkingdawking4572 all these are indian areas...if that is not the case then tibet xinjiang and taiwan are not a part of china

[@karmakdorjee2560]

Bhutan being small nation has to be friendly with both neighboring giants...

[@rajarshipalchowdhury6366]

I see India and China relationship becoming a colonial-era Britain-France relationship in the next three decades.

[@anttman41]

With the way China is becoming aggressive bears so much similarities with 1940s Germany I don't see China as one nation in 3 decades from now. There's 3rd ww coming in a decade or so.

[@markchi5785]

China will fuck Indian darki down

[@deanzaZZR]

Nice. My post was removed for simply pointing out that Bhutan is a sovereign state that can determine its borders without India's "help". It does appear that India is entering a new phase of "democracy". Good luck.

[@surajbiradar9827]

In February 2007, the Indo-Bhutan Friendship Treaty was substantially revised, clarifying Bhutan's full control of its foreign relations, as well as its independence and sovereignty. Whereas the Treaty of 1949, Article 2 stated: "The Government of India undertakes to exercise no interference in the internal administration of Bhutan. On its part the Government of Bhutan agrees to be guided by the advice of the Government of India in regard to its external relations," the revised treaty now states "In keeping with the abiding ties of close friendship and cooperation between Bhutan and India, the Government of the Kingdom of Bhutan and the Government of the Republic of India shall cooperate closely with each other on issues relating to their national interests. Neither government shall allow the use of its territory for activities harmful to the national security and interest of the other." The revised treaty also includes this preamble: "Reaffirming their respect for each other's independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity", an element absent in the earlier version. Also india is militarily responsible to defend bhutan from external aggression. So no, india isn't infringing on the sovereignty of bhutan. But it is natural to worry if your enemy positions a gun in your friendly neighbours house.

[@jdsood7101]

I am not shocked. I am shocked that our NSA did not see it coming.. Grow up kids..

[@kek209]

India really should transform the QUAD into a formal military alliance. China is simply to large and aggressive for india to deal with alone.

[@-ns-8972]

Naah! We shouldn't make the same mistake as NATO. We already have treaties in place. And moreover why destabilize an already stable relation with these two.

[@kek209]

@@-ns-8972 what mistake did nato make?? Europe is safer because of nato.

[@-ns-8972]

@@kek209 Considering taking in Ukraine and the fact that you're asking me this questions means you lack deep understanding of the political game being played at large!

[@Playmaker2810]

India needs no military alliance with anglosaxons...They are the ones who colonized ,split India and fought against Bharat supporting Pakistan together with China It will be a disaster entering into a 'quad' military alliance, especially when anyone understands that India wont be the leading nation and the relation wont be balanced Furthermore, this style of alliance will add new enemies...What will happen during a Japan-Russia military incedence?? Do you really want to add enemies? Pakistan and China are more than enough

[@kek209]

@-Ns - lol? Ukraine is still standing because of western weaponds. Countries like Poland and the Baltics are free because of nato.

[@informationfeed3705]

sir please make your show's playlist

[@SkpalTube]

Bhutan's PM is also saying the same thing as the Indian PM had said for Ladakh.

[@newsdigest375]

Free Ladakh

[@surajbiradar9827]

​​@@newsdigest375 It is free and democratic unlike the Uyghurs and tibetans.

[@newsdigest375]

@@surajbiradar9827 what about khalistan?

[@surajbiradar9827]

@@newsdigest375 Come here and ask Punjabi's if they want khalistan Or not. You will be laughed at.

[@newsdigest375]

@@surajbiradar9827 what about Indian Muslims? And Asian population in the northeast? They don't want to be a part of India.

[@SirNehru]

China has grabbed Bhutanese territory, just like it has grabbed Indian territory in Ladakh in 2020. Modi said in Indian Parliament that there has been no intrusion. Bhutanese PM has realized that when India cannot safeguard its own territory from China, then how the hell can it do so for Bhutan. Bhutanese PM has thus, taken cue from Modi and stated that 'there has been no intrusion.' These are the facts, which I have written in 3 lines. Shekhar Sir, are you, 'cutting the clutter' or 'increasing the clutter'?

[@rajx7120]

Don't misquote Modi. Modi meant, no one crossed into confirmed Indian territory. Clashes happened in areas of overlapping claims. India did have success, in pushing China out of all finger points at Pangong, and also from Galwan. Negotiations are for Gogra Hotsprinhs and Depsang Plains.

[@pikachue602]

@@rajx7120 they're bots

[@sanasama2209]

Nehru🤣🤣🤣

[@rajx7120]

@@pikachue602 No. He is not bot. He is well-known Congress supporter on Quora by the name of Col Mani Mohan Nehru. There are many old people, who love Nehruvian pre-1991 socialist era. They can't adjust with modern times. They want high FD rates and guaranteed Old Pension Scheme like olden days. These are unsustainable and will be scrapped. That's why are anti-BJP.

[@vbiotonicmascot6099]

Sad truth

[@Red.bulldozer3]

India should have exchanged disputed sea lanes in the sea of bengal for a wider siliguri corridor for its own security. But it brought the case to UN which gave verdict favoring bangladesh which forced india to give up its claims on some parts of sea of bengal

[@monirbabu8605]

India Lost the case to Bangladesh. out of 25000 skm disputed sea area Bangladesh got 19000 and India got 6000skm. India Apealed but the cas was decided by International maritime Court. That's a shame. Bangladesh tried to solve in talks. Bangladesh would agree if it was 50%, India denied. Hence Bangladesh took India to International court and won.

[@Red.bulldozer3]

@@monirbabu8605 China claimed 90% of south cina sea citing some ancient 9 line dash on some old chinese map. Phlippines brought the case to internstional tribunal which China boycotted . The tribunal rejected chinese fake claims and gave verdict in favor of Phlippines. The chinese showed middle finger to the tribunal and occupied almost all the sea although strong protests from vietnam, taiwan, phillipines, malaysia, indonesia.

[@monirbabu8605]

@@Red.bulldozer3 Will India show middle finger to International Maritime Court now regarding Bangladesh? India is doing same with Bangladesh exactly China doing with Vietnam and Philipines. India has Built multiple illegal dams on International river to Bangladesh. As a result north part of Bangladesh is facing desertification. Since last 50 years nearly 2.5million people has died due to the consequence of dams made by India. Where is humanity in case of Bangladesh??

[@Dhruv-Kumar]

@@monirbabu8605 india is a hypocrite country

[@jackgoodnight2]

Taiwan 11 dash line. What you want to talk about?😏

[@wonderfullife737]

What to expect from country literally did genocide and ethnic cleansing of Hindus out of paranoia that those innocent Lhotshampa southern Bhutanese Hindus will merge Bhutan to India.

[@dizzyb111]

Bhutan is our only ally and you Hindu nationalists will isolate them too. Then India will truly be alone.

[@maha-madpedo-gayphukumber1533]

Why the Muslim Brotherhood is Becoming a Growing Threat in India Pro-India politicians, both in India and abroad, are becoming increasingly concerned about the activities and future goals of the Muslim Brotherhood in India. While the Muslim Brotherhood is an internationally-recognized “non-violent” Islamist group, it does have indirect links to armed groups and wishes to change the current global hegemony-which is dominated by the U.S., U.K., and other Western nations-into Dar al-Islam, meaning that they wish to transform it into an Islamic land and force people to convert to Islam. The ultimate objective of the Muslim Brotherhood, as espoused by the group since the days of its founder Hassan al-Banna in the 1920s, is to adopt a political position of jihad against non-Muslims. The group has a vast international propaganda network and has spawned numerous militant leaders around the world, such as Abdullah Yusuf Azzam, a staunch follower of Al-Banna, who, in 1984, ignited the major Islamist foreign fighter flow to fight the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. By the time Azzam was killed in 1989, he had mentored Osama bin Laden, the founder of Al-Qaeda. Indeed, Bin Laden later said Brotherhood ideas were key to the formation of his ideology. The Brotherhood’s designation as a “non-violent” group relies on a literalist interpretation of its behavior, and requires ignoring its connections to militancy. In India, for example, the Brotherhood’s local versions have exacerbated inter-communal discord and created chaos on the streets with protests against the Indian government. These Brotherhood and Brotherhood-derived groups on the Subcontinent insist that the foundations of the Indian Constitution-which include the pillars of secularism, democracy, and nationalism-are anti-Islamic, and work to undermine these foundations in India, primarily by trying to provoke a religious civil war between Indian Muslims and Hindus. The Brotherhood’s vision for toppling the Indian government, creating Dar al-Islam in India, and cultivating revolt in Kashmir is also not exactly “non-violent”. Two prominent Brotherhood offshoot groups in India are the Popular Front of India (PFI) (PFI) and the National Women’s Front (NWF). The PFI was recently banned in India, which has led to something of a resurgence of an older terrorist-designated group, the Students’ Islamic Movement of India (SIMI), which works alongside domestic extremists like the Indian Mujahideen (IM), while receiving external funding from the Qatar-Turkey-Pakistan (“QTP”) axis, and having links with the Pakistani-controlled jihadist ecosystem in Afghanistan that includes the Taliban and Al-Qaeda. The outside support for Islamist militancy in India is important, but the domestic sources of support are crucial to understand. The Brotherhood’s desire to create civil strife to destabilize India and bring down the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi is being abetted financially by Indian opposition parties, according to sources. There are some who see the Muslim Brotherhood’s recent upsurge in India as primarily resulting from Indian politicians trying to use this dangerous group as a weapon to defeat Modi’s rule. This would not be completely unprecedented: there were Indian politicians who exploited the Naxalite (Communist) terrorist-insurgency as a political weapon against the government of the day, for example, a far worse situation. There are roughly as many Muslims in India as there are in Pakistan, a nominally Islamic state, and Muslims in India-unlike in Pakistan-have the freedom to take an active role in politics. There are legal mechanisms for parties to collaborate to remove Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The apparent sly support of a number of Indian politicians for the Brotherhood is, therefore, highly irresponsible. The Brotherhood does not just want to replace the current government; it wants to overthrow the entire ruling system, especially the secularism, but also the democracy and nationalism, because the Brotherhood sees these things as destructive to Islam. A significant motive for the Muslim Brotherhood resuming its activities in India is that as the country becomes a rising power it is drawing closer to the U.S. and could soon pose a major threat to the anti-Western bloc in South and Southeastern Asia, which is backed by China. That is why this alliance, primarily operating through Pakistan, is supporting the Muslim Brotherhood in India, hoping to use the 204 million Muslims in India to provoke civil strife against Hindus to hamper India’s rise. The Muslim population in India is the third largest Muslim population in the world, and the concern of Indian politicians and security agencies is that if the Muslim Brotherhood’s roots are strengthened in India, it will become increasingly difficult to govern the country. In a situation of disorder, it would make Indian Muslims more susceptible to being recruited by the Brotherhood and other international terrorist groups.

[@mayank9638]

​@@dizzyb111 You need to read up on geopolitics more before showing off your ignorance. Kindly study about the Lhotshampa genocide before writing nonsense on the internet.

[@rajupreti0000]

So true.

[@Faceless-Patriote]

@@mayank9638 you reap what you sow. Not all lhotshampas are anti national. What geo politics are you asking him to study? Bhutan chased out anti national elements who wanted a Gorkhadesh. Can you call it a Sikh genocide just because few khalistanies wants a separate state… one day when the Gorkhadesh separatists in Darjeeling takes up arms against India and the Indian army cracks down on them, we will wait for you to term it as a Hindu genocide. Get a life! You and your parents are nothing but a anti national terrorist and now you hide behind your religion and plays the victim card. First own up what you and your parents did in Bhutan, the burning down of schools, kidnapping, murder and undermining the sovereignty of the country, you deserve the retaliation.

[@InvisibleB3357]

First time I saw a Indian news channel showed that Tibet not part of china👍💯

[@ininjad24]

Alarming developments in our neighborhood - very well covered, let us hope it resonates in Indian mainstream media and parliament. Would be interesting to see India's strategy to counter Chinese expansionism in our entire neighborhood.

[@venkatramannarayan9831]

If only the opposition circus goes beyond remove-modi-politics and becomes promote-india-politics. Rahul Gandhi would have been arrested and tried for sedition and placed before a shooting squad had he been in China. That is what Xi Jinping did on his way to his supremo position to many of his challengers except Bo Xi Lai whom he incarcerated for life.

[@Red.bulldozer3]

India cannot even protect its borders from chinese aggression. How it is going to protect her smaller neighbors?

[@sreenathgopinathan4002]

Opposition parties especially congress party would be more than happy to concede those territories to China Rahul Gandhi is great grandson of Great Jawaharlal Nehru. Moreover he is bearing same surname as Mahatma Gandhi

[@x1avenger]

Did it matter to you?? Bhutan and Nepal are sorveign countries and free to do what they think good for them..

[@venkatramannarayan9831]

@@x1avenger Sir, so are we, Sri Lanka, and Taiwan are an example. Even Ukraine is a sovereign nation but US and USSR had an agreement not to expand the boundaries of NATO, however, US deep state encouraged Zelensky's ascendence and then sought to expand NATO. Chinese communist party's and especially Xi's ideal is that China must become the middle kingdom and the surrounding states should act as vassal buffer states, who should accord primacy to the middle kingdom's interest. Failing that the middle kingdom would take appropriate action to forcibly align the vassal. Hence, we are the sore nail sticking out. If RG comes to power then that goal of the CCP has a fighting chance, since RG cannot stop praising China. Our neighbours are also our buffer but China does not want it that way.

[@sr10307001]

Why would you show the map with Arunachal Pradesh disputed, dotted line boundary 😮

[@hawkingdawking4572]

Because it's the former British held NEFA Himalayan Tibetan region. As India is a Hindu Rashtra, only Hindu areas are part of India.

[@sauravsuresh]

​@@hawkingdawking4572 where do you get your news from?

[@bijaychhetri7618]

it is disputed and china gonna take it ….

[@hawkingdawking4572]

@@sauravsuresh From reality.

[@PraveenKumar-hu4xf]

​@@hawkingdawking4572 what a stupid muslim bot.😂

[@Advaitamanta]

If ccp stops its unnecessary expansion. India, Russia and china can form the strongest alliance known to men.

[@nsevv]

Eww no thanks... Russia and china are evil expressionist.

[@opai1821]

it will still be meme

[@ghtwghtw7197]

ccp just want the land britain gave away without consulting them

[@朱晓言]

why you not show the maps from China side? or some of Bhutan maps? only shows the maps from other side.

[@buddhu123f4]

There are no sides, this is the correct map you stupid

[@trumpxiunptin4540]

It seems like two lions are trying to stratch tiny Bhutan. Both of lions cannit fight with Bhutan because of its size and powerless and Bhutan is harmless and provides security services to both Lions. So instead of trying to stretch both lions must thanks to Bhutan by providing financial support for the development of Bhutan infrastructure to enable to provide strong security to China and India.

[@qingshanyipian1936]

Last time I checked, Bhutan is a sovereign nation. They have the right to decide whether they want Chinese investment in their country. China means economic development and growth. India for the past decades have done almost nothing to help. China will connect railroad from Bhutan to cities in China and rest of southeastern Asia to many seaports for exports. Giving them much needed access to trade besides the only route thru India currently

[@dreamadventure8220]

Yes true since China occupied their blood brother Tibet, Bhutan shut it's all door to Devil and dont even revognise China lol. And your words are such great reminiscent of past when China entered Tibet only to built lol

[@surajbiradar9827]

In February 2007, the Indo-Bhutan Friendship Treaty was substantially revised, clarifying Bhutan's full control of its foreign relations, as well as its independence and sovereignty. Whereas the Treaty of 1949, Article 2 stated: "The Government of India undertakes to exercise no interference in the internal administration of Bhutan. On its part the Government of Bhutan agrees to be guided by the advice of the Government of India in regard to its external relations," the revised treaty now states "In keeping with the abiding ties of close friendship and cooperation between Bhutan and India, the Government of the Kingdom of Bhutan and the Government of the Republic of India shall cooperate closely with each other on issues relating to their national interests. Neither government shall allow the use of its territory for activities harmful to the national security and interest of the other." The revised treaty also includes this preamble: "Reaffirming their respect for each other's independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity", an element absent in the earlier version. Also india is militarily responsible to defend bhutan from external aggression. India has funded hydroelectricity projects in bhutan and bought the electricity which practically doubled the GDP Per capita of bhutan. Bhutan has the shortest route to sea ports through india and importantly Bangladesh than going 1000's of miles through chinese cities. We all know how "genuine" China's "economic" Aid is to other countries. We saw it in Sri Lanka, Pakistan and central american countries where the Chinese literally bribed their way to resources and make mines. Get your facts right rather than CCP propaganda.

[@sandeepkv09]

Wow China saying non sense, What have they done in Pak, Srilanka and many countries, controling the govt and also buying the govts. china is the new colonial power, Seriously why india cannot go and sit in border and built the infra. it is high time, money has to be spend there.

[@sanjogsingh-f3m]

bhutan is not the part of india it is a country with full dignity

[@VishalKhopkar1296]

Bhutanese PM must've said this just to please his electorate. Someone should ask him a question "how do you exactly define Bhutanese territory? Is the disputed territory a part of Bhutan or China?"

[@Red.bulldozer3]

Indians have been saying chinese occupied indian territories as disputed. And the reason chinese regularly intrude into india because different perceptions of border line. So bhutan can use same terms. Ok.

[@aakarshjha1633]

@@Red.bulldozer3 Why do they have different perception of border with fking everyone? India Russia Phillipines Taiwan Nepal Bhutan Mongolia and more. China is an expansionist and hegemonic evil.No matter what you write in comment it doesn't changes the fact that Bhutan is existing bcz it's and Indian protectorate

[@DrTPD]

The history written by Sun Xihui is actually accurate. It maybe inconvenient but factual Shekhar ji.

[@DrTPD]

The Bhutanese electorate don't want to loses territory. Infact his statement is similar to PM Modi saying Aksai Chin is in China.

[@nsevv]

@@DrTPD Yup history is accurate and china is occupying Manchuria colony (Tibet) as a colonizer.

[@pardeeptandon]

The Bhutanese are uncomfortable with growing Hindutva in India. As Bhutanese Buddhists have not forgotten that a Brahmin king Pushyamiyra Shunga had committed genocide against Buddhist monks and forced them to flee to the mountains from the plains of Bihar.

[@मगरमच्छ]

Sutia comment.

[@chanakyabharat756]

Ok but can they really apply something to this current time and if they go closer to China they will become.another Tibet.

[@ArghyadeepPal]

If they are really uncomfortable, maybe you should research how Nepali Hindus were treated in Bhutan.

[@rajx7120]

Lol! Bhutan did not exist at the time of Shunga. And no, he didn't commit any genocide. But Ashoka did genocide of Ajivikas and Jains.

[@Faceless-Patriote]

@@rajx7120 our written history dates back to the 7th century. We have no idea who that king was. Buddhism in Bhutan came from Tibet not from India directly.

[@harisundar8698]

Very crisp episode SG 👌

[@Bhogyaloo1959]

It is about power and survival, the real thing is about India & China's political view on Bhutan and their political ambitions, so Bhutan knows & feels pains of what happened to their brother Tibet. All nations of neighbouring countries of Tibet have a hand of lost Tibet, the real owner of disputed land, Bhutan is just trying to save themselves. If there are clear political views from India on Bhutan then Bhutan will not choose such a line.

[@KelzangDorji]

Bhutan also feels the pain of their brother Sikkim

[@dreamadventure8220]

But to expect china would change it's course by gaining a meagre territories is utterly stupid.

[@pardeeptandon]

I hope you are aware that Tibet is more prosperous than India today.

[@Bhogyaloo1959]

@@pardeeptandon Yes I know details about how Chinese have occupied Tibet and Chinese people an Invader who is still trying to eliminate Tibetan by mass migration of Chinese people into Tibet, Tibetans are now second class people in their own land and still claiming You have developed Tibet in the face of world peoples, actually all the country of the world knows details about your shameless doing, Wait for your karma, it is on the way to get you barbarian Chinese. Tibetan has given you compassion but so we are very different from the beginning and will be forever, wait and see.

[@tsheringphuntsho1000]

“India proactively went in to Bhutanese territory to protect Bhutan without the invitation of Bhutan”. Which country does that and which country allows such intrusion? Explain please. Wasn’t this violation of international law? No treaty is in place allowing this. Height of biased media. Propaganda to accuse a harmless neighbour. Why is this Gupta having so much hatred against Bhutan?

[@typicalKAMBlover21]

With all due respect, as a Chinese living in US I just want to say two things: 1. I absolutely trust the capability of Indian EAM S. Jaishankar to have the wisdom and strategic might to deal with the Sino-Indian border disputes. Actually I wish China had someone like him, then it would not look so bad in the international community. 2. The two countries would both have had much better economic future if they didn’t have to struggle over the problems the British left us. This is just one of them.

[@adityajoshi7465]

Agree with you. It's too convenient for America to have india and china destroy each other so that it can remain the sole and unchallenged superpower. But unfortunately Xi is too expansionist and unreasonable. Very delicate time for asia.

[@yuzihao8777]

我服了你这是多少copium

[@vj_great551]

Fake Chinese Indian...didn't know china made fake indians

[@raymondmajid8858]

Never mind, this guy sold his sole to the western deep-state many years ago (watch his interview with Pompeo). Only thing, this guy does is anti-china propaganda. This people never want "Asian Century", only thing this people want is continuity of western slavery.

[@ArjunSingh-wl9dc]

This guy so called journalist is actually an enemy of Hindus and India. So whatever he says, we just take it as a enemy point of view. Dont take him seriously..

[@nepalama3339]

When will India get away from Kalapani of Nepal occupied illegally since 1962? Double standard has no place in this era.

[@Ishant007]

nepal belong to india

[@nepalama3339]

@@Ishant007 Yes the leader called Madhav Nepal belongs to India.

[@randomlifts]

We say nature reserve Some others will say exotic food

[@truthseeker327]

Why didnt we pressure Bhutan to not allow this?

[@dhanjeepandey4252]

Stability at border and proper management will help the globe.👍👍👍👍👍

[@nimzam932]

When there is a conflict between two parties, both parties have a say. That's Bhutan and China. Because of our close friendship, Bhutan allows India to be an equal partner. Now, what's the Indian media saying?

[@BharatThatIsIndia]

Is it like Indian PM saying that no territory is lost, noone has come inside Indian territory!!

[@aakarshjha1633]

Yes they haven't

[@BharatThatIsIndia]

@@aakarshjha1633 Acchha. So why there is issue between India and chaina? Why did our 20+ soldiers died? Thoda Logic laga liya karo.

[@samdarshianand1305]

​@@BharatThatIsIndia territory lost nahi hua hai bas incursions hui thi

[@BharatThatIsIndia]

@@samdarshianand1305 😂😂😂😂

[@smartobserver5123]

Mr Shekhar Gupta, I'm liking this new person who is analytical, attriculate and fact based. While your class was never in question, your " Bent" was! May Long this new transformation last and bring you success!

[@mg.f.9023]

Our 'Chicken Main Stream Media' does not discuss this.

[@keshav4408]

Congratulations for 1200 episodes

[@pardeeptandon]

If the Indian PM can deny Chinese intrusions on Indian territory, why not Bhutan"s PM do the same?

[@maha-madpedo-gayphukumber1533]

Why the Muslim Brotherhood is Becoming a Growing Threat in India Pro-India politicians, both in India and abroad, are becoming increasingly concerned about the activities and future goals of the Muslim Brotherhood in India. While the Muslim Brotherhood is an internationally-recognized “non-violent” Islamist group, it does have indirect links to armed groups and wishes to change the current global hegemony-which is dominated by the U.S., U.K., and other Western nations-into Dar al-Islam, meaning that they wish to transform it into an Islamic land and force people to convert to Islam. The ultimate objective of the Muslim Brotherhood, as espoused by the group since the days of its founder Hassan al-Banna in the 1920s, is to adopt a political position of jihad against non-Muslims. The group has a vast international propaganda network and has spawned numerous militant leaders around the world, such as Abdullah Yusuf Azzam, a staunch follower of Al-Banna, who, in 1984, ignited the major Islamist foreign fighter flow to fight the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. By the time Azzam was killed in 1989, he had mentored Osama bin Laden, the founder of Al-Qaeda. Indeed, Bin Laden later said Brotherhood ideas were key to the formation of his ideology. The Brotherhood’s designation as a “non-violent” group relies on a literalist interpretation of its behavior, and requires ignoring its connections to militancy. In India, for example, the Brotherhood’s local versions have exacerbated inter-communal discord and created chaos on the streets with protests against the Indian government. These Brotherhood and Brotherhood-derived groups on the Subcontinent insist that the foundations of the Indian Constitution-which include the pillars of secularism, democracy, and nationalism-are anti-Islamic, and work to undermine these foundations in India, primarily by trying to provoke a religious civil war between Indian Muslims and Hindus. The Brotherhood’s vision for toppling the Indian government, creating Dar al-Islam in India, and cultivating revolt in Kashmir is also not exactly “non-violent”. Two prominent Brotherhood offshoot groups in India are the Popular Front of India (PFI) (PFI) and the National Women’s Front (NWF). The PFI was recently banned in India, which has led to something of a resurgence of an older terrorist-designated group, the Students’ Islamic Movement of India (SIMI), which works alongside domestic extremists like the Indian Mujahideen (IM), while receiving external funding from the Qatar-Turkey-Pakistan (“QTP”) axis, and having links with the Pakistani-controlled jihadist ecosystem in Afghanistan that includes the Taliban and Al-Qaeda. The outside support for Islamist militancy in India is important, but the domestic sources of support are crucial to understand. The Brotherhood’s desire to create civil strife to destabilize India and bring down the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi is being abetted financially by Indian opposition parties, according to sources. There are some who see the Muslim Brotherhood’s recent upsurge in India as primarily resulting from Indian politicians trying to use this dangerous group as a weapon to defeat Modi’s rule. This would not be completely unprecedented: there were Indian politicians who exploited the Naxalite (Communist) terrorist-insurgency as a political weapon against the government of the day, for example, a far worse situation. There are roughly as many Muslims in India as there are in Pakistan, a nominally Islamic state, and Muslims in India-unlike in Pakistan-have the freedom to take an active role in politics. There are legal mechanisms for parties to collaborate to remove Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The apparent sly support of a number of Indian politicians for the Brotherhood is, therefore, highly irresponsible. The Brotherhood does not just want to replace the current government; it wants to overthrow the entire ruling system, especially the secularism, but also the democracy and nationalism, because the Brotherhood sees these things as destructive to Islam. A significant motive for the Muslim Brotherhood resuming its activities in India is that as the country becomes a rising power it is drawing closer to the U.S. and could soon pose a major threat to the anti-Western bloc in South and Southeastern Asia, which is backed by China. That is why this alliance, primarily operating through Pakistan, is supporting the Muslim Brotherhood in India, hoping to use the 204 million Muslims in India to provoke civil strife against Hindus to hamper India’s rise. The Muslim population in India is the third largest Muslim population in the world, and the concern of Indian politicians and security agencies is that if the Muslim Brotherhood’s roots are strengthened in India, it will become increasingly difficult to govern the country. In a situation of disorder, it would make Indian Muslims more susceptible to being recruited by the Brotherhood and other international terrorist groups.

[@Prateek_Anup]

Areee it's nothing like Bhutan has conceded territory to China. Has India ever accepted Chinese Village in Arunachal Pradesh? No! Because an official accepting would have bigger ramifications in every dimension for starters in domestic politics.

[@sauravsuresh]

Modi has said the same thing, there are no Chinese villages in India apparently

[@nagarajanv6381]

The Chinese position is rich in irony. "India is a colonizer because India is doing to Bhutan what we do to many countries through loans and the BRI."

[@devendragautam8476]

I listen to the presentations from the representatives of self-styled Vishwaguru like Shekhar Gupta with much interest. While talking about a marauding China, I request you to also not forget that India has been illegally occupying parcels of Nepali territories in Susta, Maheshpur, Pashupatingar and the 400-sq km Lipulek-Kalapani-Limpiadhura. The 400-sq km territory is where some of your troops sought refuge in the war with Nehru's very own bhai, China, in 1962. This single episode, among many others, shows that New Delhi needs to do much more than present a long list of Chinese sins to absolve her own sins. India has border disputes with almost every neighbor, doesn't it? दुसराेँके पाप गिनानेसे विश्वगुरूके पाप कम नहिँ हाेँगे। The world's largest democracy should not sink so low as to compare herself with the world's largest autocracy.

[@rajx7120]

Can you defend that tri-junction area from China? If yes, take it. In return, you people get to work in Indian economy, without a visa.

[@AzharKaz]

ShekharG, how long will you avoid the issue of disqualification of Rahul?

[@Red.bulldozer3]

Bhutan is playing chinese card against india very well as many indian neighbors as done. Bhutan knows very well if it want to survive, it has to choose the stronger side.

[@Black80iq-qn7ks]

Thats wrong, Bhutan simply act on its own interest like India has been doing

[@dungna5424]

Yes, india didn't give back duars to Bhutan. Assam , Bengal n many

[@UwUeboi]

Dude if possible come to duars or assam or bengal .. no one here wants to join bhutan . Native people are the one to decide which country they wnna join

[@suneelgupta624]

This statement is for domestic audience of Bhutan. Its similar to the statement given by our PM Modi about chinese incursions in India. No current leader likes to admit that they can't protect their land, especially when there is no recourse for them to do so.

[@dandmello5283]

So very nice to Listen to TheShekarGuptaji Informative Journalism Par Excellence since then DoordarshanTV times👌superb and it's lovely listening too

[@MiddleKingdom305]

As a Bhutanese, we need to align to whoever will help us improve. China fits that bill! It’s only geopolitics.

[@Red.bulldozer3]

Bhutan PM is following Modi’s announcement that no enemies in indian soil and no indian soil lost. Modi is a good example.

[@kunalandevakirubai8136]

Well disseminated for the ordinary audience and most important without bias Cheers for that 🥂

[@GururajBN]

Three thousand kilometers?! You mean three thousand square kilometers, don't you? First one is only length or distance, second one is area. The long and short of this story is that Bhutan has conceded some of the territory to the Chinese. Difficult for a very tiny nation to withstand the Bully that China is.

[@TakaluKevin]

THUMBS DOWN... Your coverage of 370 cannot be forgotten anytime soon.

[@noahlee4764]

Bhutan PM saying china has not made any intrusion but indians love listening to their white sahibs Mr Barnet that China has made an intrusion.😂

[@പരുന്ത്]

So you are telling me satelites are lying they are showing us a parallel universe where they have made villages in Bhutan. You can find these information pretty easily we have our own satelite network to check whether it's right or wrong it's not about being brown or white but evidence.

[@vbiotonicmascot6099]

Then why bhutan calling both china and india to talk about the territory

[@sauravsuresh]

Yes propaganda bot, when you make claims on new property every day and bully tiny countries into accepting it some things look blurry

[@noahlee4764]

@@sauravsuresh bot are you a dalit. If china is bullying them why is the PM of Bhutan saying china has not intruded into Bhutan, it's India which is ranting with it's white masters.China doesn't bully small countries it bullies big countries like India .The PLA is in demchok,depsang plains,gogra and hot springs having a BBQ picnic party.

[@SamiUllah-lg8ol]

China and Bhutan long live friendships. Free Khalistan

[@Ishant007]

nobody assk poopistani here

[@madhusudhanansanjeevi5437]

Waiting too long for Rahul Gandhi disqualification issue

[@animeshmishra286]

Best show on geopolitics

[@dreamadventure8220]

Free Tibet is needed more than ever

[@nsekar0122]

Mr. Gupta, why no c-t-c on RaGa's disqualification and the fall-out of the political part of it? Your strength is Indian politics. Play to your strength.😊

[@nimzam932]

The disputed piece of land is in Bhutan which China is laying claims to. So the dispute is between Bhutan and China. When the PM of Bhutan mentioned that the third country also has a say in this dispute , that third country is India. India is indirectly involved in this dispute of the Doklam plateau between Bhutan and China because of the strategic reasons and Bhutan respects India's deep strategic concern. But why is the Indian media harping about involving China and creating a negative narrative ?? China is already involved directly with Bhutan as these two nations share the Doklam plateau border. Since Bhutan understands the strategic importance of India's interest in Doklam and the PM of Bhutan suggested involving India in the talks for resolving the issue which is prudent. Doklam issue is a very complex geo political scenario but this will never damage the great friendship and relationship that India and Bhutan share and cherish , as both nations mutually support and respect each other.

[@maverick8396]

If this is the bhutan attitude, then let them be taken by china and we should withdraw from the defense treaty with them. They will learn their own lesson.

[@rohitupadhya6449]

This is the kind of attitude that enabled China to take Tibet. If China is given even a chance to influence Bhutan, 40million indians will soon find themselves very close to becoming actually Chinese, not just facing racism in mainland India being called Chinese. People just assume things and come and comment on videos without understanding the ground truth. Reason India is where she is right now.

[@maverick8396]

@Rohit Upadhya actually u can't blame bhutan also. We have been so lazy in our defense mordenization that it has left bhutan with no choice and given china chance to be a dommie. We can't even protect ourselves, how will we protect others? 😏 All because of our lazy beurocrats who prefer self over country. Traitors.😏 👎

[@maha-madpedo-gayphukumber1533]

Why the Muslim Brotherhood is Becoming a Growing Threat in India Pro-India politicians, both in India and abroad, are becoming increasingly concerned about the activities and future goals of the Muslim Brotherhood in India. While the Muslim Brotherhood is an internationally-recognized “non-violent” Islamist group, it does have indirect links to armed groups and wishes to change the current global hegemony-which is dominated by the U.S., U.K., and other Western nations-into Dar al-Islam, meaning that they wish to transform it into an Islamic land and force people to convert to Islam. The ultimate objective of the Muslim Brotherhood, as espoused by the group since the days of its founder Hassan al-Banna in the 1920s, is to adopt a political position of jihad against non-Muslims. The group has a vast international propaganda network and has spawned numerous militant leaders around the world, such as Abdullah Yusuf Azzam, a staunch follower of Al-Banna, who, in 1984, ignited the major Islamist foreign fighter flow to fight the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. By the time Azzam was killed in 1989, he had mentored Osama bin Laden, the founder of Al-Qaeda. Indeed, Bin Laden later said Brotherhood ideas were key to the formation of his ideology. The Brotherhood’s designation as a “non-violent” group relies on a literalist interpretation of its behavior, and requires ignoring its connections to militancy. In India, for example, the Brotherhood’s local versions have exacerbated inter-communal discord and created chaos on the streets with protests against the Indian government. These Brotherhood and Brotherhood-derived groups on the Subcontinent insist that the foundations of the Indian Constitution-which include the pillars of secularism, democracy, and nationalism-are anti-Islamic, and work to undermine these foundations in India, primarily by trying to provoke a religious civil war between Indian Muslims and Hindus. The Brotherhood’s vision for toppling the Indian government, creating Dar al-Islam in India, and cultivating revolt in Kashmir is also not exactly “non-violent”. Two prominent Brotherhood offshoot groups in India are the Popular Front of India (PFI) (PFI) and the National Women’s Front (NWF). The PFI was recently banned in India, which has led to something of a resurgence of an older terrorist-designated group, the Students’ Islamic Movement of India (SIMI), which works alongside domestic extremists like the Indian Mujahideen (IM), while receiving external funding from the Qatar-Turkey-Pakistan (“QTP”) axis, and having links with the Pakistani-controlled jihadist ecosystem in Afghanistan that includes the Taliban and Al-Qaeda. The outside support for Islamist militancy in India is important, but the domestic sources of support are crucial to understand. The Brotherhood’s desire to create civil strife to destabilize India and bring down the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi is being abetted financially by Indian opposition parties, according to sources. There are some who see the Muslim Brotherhood’s recent upsurge in India as primarily resulting from Indian politicians trying to use this dangerous group as a weapon to defeat Modi’s rule. This would not be completely unprecedented: there were Indian politicians who exploited the Naxalite (Communist) terrorist-insurgency as a political weapon against the government of the day, for example, a far worse situation. There are roughly as many Muslims in India as there are in Pakistan, a nominally Islamic state, and Muslims in India-unlike in Pakistan-have the freedom to take an active role in politics. There are legal mechanisms for parties to collaborate to remove Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The apparent sly support of a number of Indian politicians for the Brotherhood is, therefore, highly irresponsible. The Brotherhood does not just want to replace the current government; it wants to overthrow the entire ruling system, especially the secularism, but also the democracy and nationalism, because the Brotherhood sees these things as destructive to Islam. A significant motive for the Muslim Brotherhood resuming its activities in India is that as the country becomes a rising power it is drawing closer to the U.S. and could soon pose a major threat to the anti-Western bloc in South and Southeastern Asia, which is backed by China. That is why this alliance, primarily operating through Pakistan, is supporting the Muslim Brotherhood in India, hoping to use the 204 million Muslims in India to provoke civil strife against Hindus to hamper India’s rise. The Muslim population in India is the third largest Muslim population in the world, and the concern of Indian politicians and security agencies is that if the Muslim Brotherhood’s roots are strengthened in India, it will become increasingly difficult to govern the country. In a situation of disorder, it would make Indian Muslims more susceptible to being recruited by the Brotherhood and other international terrorist groups.

[@vbiotonicmascot6099]

What can bhutan do when India which is supposed to protect bhutan could not protect it's own land.

[@maverick8396]

@vbiotonic mascot bitter truth and it hits hard. But not to those naked shameless govt beurocrats who delay the mordenization of defense just so they can feed their deep pockets. Rascals😤 This type of attitude got us into this mess on first place.

[@t5ruxlee210]

If the name "Russia" is substituted for "East India Company", even the blindest diplos in the world should have no difficulty in "decoding the PRC message in its entirety..."

[@WorldwideTrainSpotter]

This is a damn serious issue and our government seems totally oblivious.

[@ArjunSingh-wl9dc]

lol..

[@jamespaul6628]

Let's face the truth that China today is a very rich Superpower and militarily the 3rd most powerful country in the world whereas India is a very poor country (as per GDP per capita) and a 3rd rate mediocre power. Even India's immediate neighbours do not have high regards for India. Why so? The answer is as clear as daylight. The question to ask is - Does India have the guts and the gumption to take on China in an open all our war? Personally I think if there is indeed an open all out war between the two, India will be pulverised into smithereens. India knows it too. In view of the aforesaid, the Bhutanese prime minister is right in saying that China is an equal party to the issue for he is a realist and he knows that if push comes to shove India will not stand militarily with Bhutan and as such, India is a liability to Bhutan. He can discern and can foresee that India will walk away from Bhutan with its tail between its legs and its head bowed down. Need I go further on this subject matter?

[@deepim2692]

Want to hear about Myanmar civil war

[@6hariprasad]

These villages were given to china in 1984 by king jigme wanchuk . So , since then bhutan’s total square matter from 4700 hundred to 3900 .

[@KSK99]

Very nice talk, but all Indian Shudras people must send Talibrahmaneech to protect Border ASAP.

[@nrao8977]

India should go an occupy the areas that India needs. Gupta ji will be out of a job granted.

[@dilipkv]

Story of Indian diplomacy- India holds all the strings but China is the one makes strides with Bhutan

[@AgnosticGuy]

India needs to stop its na ghar ka na ghat ka policy. It should allign with US. Russian is an old ally but its more inclined towards china for obvious reasons. China is too big for us to fight alone we need support from the QUAD to tackle them which is not as easy as making reels with arambh hai prachand music in background for managing vote bank.

[@Dipps]

US is in self destruction mode. Going with USA means goin in Hell.

[@tusharrakheja7741]

_"making reels with arambh hai prachand music in background"_ why is this so accurate 😂

[@nsevv]

Russia is never an ally Soviet was. Russia didn't even help India when china invaded our borders.

[@nsevv]

@@renegadepuppy Like us the US also fought against their UK imperials and became independent.

[@dreamadventure8220]

Comceeding a territory that too a country which is already small in area in a hope to stop the giant is surely a diplomatic disaster

[@ayzhah9369]

Tibet itself don’t belong to China how come Bhutan border belongs to them. China is definitely trying to do what they had done to Tibet. It’s great red flag,Bhutan and India do need to be very alert.

[@khaitsae]

Tibet is part of China.

[@pritesh0117]

If Bhutanese don’t care about that piece of land, why don’t they donate it to India in Goodwill like Pakistan did with China in J&K!

[@rationalthinker2200]

China will advance its interest and India will also advance her interest..there is no doubt about that..now what about Bhutan..doesn t Bhutan as an Independent and soverign state advance Bhutan interest. Isn t India acting exactly like a colonial state onto Bhutan..if India relies on unequal treaties signed during British rule to run Bhutan external affairs and dictate Bhutans foreign policy based on Indian interest and not Bhutan? Bhutan has a long border with China and this is not the Indian border with China...and it is the soverign right of Bhutan to negotiate and live peacefully with the largest economic ( PPP terms) nation on earth.. Same as Sri Lanka..or Bangladesh..Maldives etc.. The Americans put military bases in South Korea ..Japan and Phillipines ..it is an existential threat to the Chinese but the Chinese have to accept the fact that those countries are soverign ..same as should the Chinese put a military base in Cuba..oops the US will be screaming for invasion of Cuba in a heartbeat .Here we see the doublestandards of Superpowers..throughout history and sadly this will continue till kingdom come...

[@pematshering9423]

Hello old man please don't try to politicise everything. We can understand Indians concern however regarding the border of Bhutan, fellow Bhutanese know 100% better than you exactly like you know about India. Therefore, I beg you, if the border problem is between China and Bhutan let us solve it by ourselves. Please mind it that you can't feel my pain just by your vision, whatsoever! Thank you.

[@tigerking2742]

This is his survival struggle 👍👍he is never bother about Bhutanese point of view

[@sauravsuresh]

To be honest, India doesn't mind what bhutan does in their territory, we just want to keep the Chinese away from eating into our borders

[@tsheringleki5581]

I believe roughly 7000 KM were conceded to China in total areas

[@ArjomaMoulick]

Sir your content is so important for those preparing for upsc. Thank you

[@sid7186]

Hospitals, clinics and labs are on strike in Rajasthan for more than a week...all doctors are on street... Yet to see anything from the print

[@lionvictor9944]

Hello SG, so what? Global Times article is accurate.

[@adityamookerjee.]

Bhutan hasn't asked India to take part in any negotiations they have had with China in the recent past, and India hasn't done so, either. Has China concluded negotiations with Bhutan or not, or do they want to take the negotiations further? Bhutan wants India to be a part of the future negotiations that it has with China.

[@indranibanerjee1548]

Why does the Bhutan pm sounds so like another pm with 56" chest saying no one has come inside Indian territory yet the fact is 20 Indian soldiers died and many others injured? What happened he did not explained . 😅

[@edisonone]

K, Mr. Gupta! To get the King of Bhutan to come out and sing your song, you need a powerful ally! You need Mr. Elmer Yuan to sing the Bhutan Hymn together with your as a duet meaning you scratch his back and he scratch yours. The only way to sing in South Asia!

[@tsheltrimdorji5177]

With due respect Indian media just getting to sensitive about this.