Cyberpunk 2077 Overdrive RTX 4080 vs PS5 Ray Tracing Mode Graphics Comparison

Cyberpunk 2077 Overdrive RTX 4080 vs PS5 Ray Tracing Mode Graphics Comparison
PC version captured in 4K Max Settings with DLSS 3 set to Quality preset. Ray Tracing set to Overdrive Mode.
PS5 version captured in Ray Tracing mode.
PC RTX 4080 Setup:
Gigabyte RTX 4080 EAGLE OC 16 GB www.gigabyte.com/Graphics-Car...
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: amzn.to/3dUo7dl
MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI amzn.to/2YTXb9y
G.SKILL 32GB (4x8GB) 3200MHz CL16 Ripjaws V Black
amzn.to/2YXPPlv
Many thanks to Gigabyte and Nvidia for sending this GPU for test!
Kanał GRANALIZA po polsku:
/ @granaliza
Consider supporting my channel for cool bonuses:
/ @cycu1
Looking good quality gameplay for your own videos?
Consider subscribing my other channels to be up to date!
Cycu1 Xbox Archive / @cycu1xboxarchive130
Cycu1 PlayStation Archive / @cycu1playstationarchi...
Cycu1 Nintendo Archive / @cycu1nintendoarchive454
Looking for gift cards?
PSN: amzn.to/3eFkAjM
Xbox: amzn.to/3gzvsl8
Nintendo eShop: amzn.to/2TRMbqf
Looking for RTX Graphics Cards? Check on Amazon: amzn.to/3dzcGYZ
Follow me on Twitter: / cyckiewicz
Find me on Facebook: / cycu1yt
Cycu1's friends:
Jabcook:
/ jabcook juz
Easy Unboxing:
/ @easyunboxing
Quick Expert Reviews
/ @quickexpertreviews
FA Gamez:
/ mrxboxgamer007
#Cyberpunk2077 #RTX4080 #PS5 #Nvidia #Gigabyte #Cyberpunk2077Overdrive

[@Cycu1]

Get your RTX 4080 here: amzn.to/3JTQhZ5

[@day-bu2ms]

No thanks

[@Eradifyerao]

My RX 6800 does the job perfectly fine...

[@CrocoDylianVT]

too expensive

[@theneonguy4855]

unless it is free

[@user-ev2vg4mu3m]

yeah sure... only cost a thousand dollars

[@Blackrain.61]

The Ps5 console did a great job for the $500 hardware.

[@MichaelDoesLife]

It did better than PC

[@YuGo_Wolverino]

@@MichaelDoesLife LOL try harder, troll.

[@MichaelDoesLife]

@@YuGo_WolverinoCope and seethe, shill

[@HeloisGevit]

​@@MichaelDoesLife Cope

[@MichaelDoesLife]

@@HeloisGevit Seethe

[@JanLe82]

Some unsolicited criticism: I suggest flipping the pictures back and forth rapidly 2 or 3 times for comparison, not the slow gradual fade. Digital Foundry does that and it's so much easier to compare.

[@tyjreyrhkgfuy278]

Agreed. That way you have both images side by side

[@191desperado]

@@tyjreyrhkgfuy278 That's not what they are suggesting here. Picture swap. Back and forth.

[@S0L4RFlare]

Aaa.... Maybe both.

[@TheFanaticTesters]

side by side best and simple

[@eduardoarg607]

Absolutely agreed. By far the best way to compare.

[@keef78]

I have a 4090 and overdrive does look amazing in many scenarios, sometimes jaw dropping but PS5 still looks phenominal, shows just how talented the artists actually are.

[@Phoboskomboa]

In a way, overdrive mode is wasted on a game with as much visual polish as this one.

[@ArnikoGiri]

@@Phoboskomboa no its not. its def not

[@ashfernandes2651]

Did you sell your kidney for that 4090, or your daughter?

[@ArnikoGiri]

@@ashfernandes2651 Maybe he has a good job? Studied well in school and college? Worked hard?

[@ArnikoGiri]

@@MichaeltheORIGINAL1 ok cool?

[@loso8670]

Considering the cost of a PC with a 4080 in it which would be around £2500- the PS5 is £400… you really can’t complain. I think there both winners 👍

[@AT7897]

They're*

[@n.y.npache2646]

mmmh i don't like the shadows on PT .. makes it strange for me .. if i couldn't compare like that maybe i wouldn't have noticed , but i prefer ps5 lighting

[@Jimmylovessalt]

There really is no 1,000 dollar difference I see. The GPU better give me GTA 6 graphics or something, but in reality there is no huge difference although the price difference is huge. Before you say, you can use the 4090 for work and development. trust me, you can buy a workstation pc and a gaming console for significantly less.

[@Ekimara]

2500 is only the gpu xD

[@suparibhau]

​@@Jimmylovessaltthe visual fidelity might look good in ps5 but the main drawback for the cheap hardware is performance. Ps5 can't even give a stable 30 while at the same settings 4080 can do solid 90-100fps. Also, any good workstation pc will also perform great in gaming, so I don't understand why tf would someone by a PS5 on top of that when the workstation pc will outperform it

[@RicochetForce]

Props to the artists at CD Projekt that managed to evoke such a distinct aesthetic entirely within the constraints of rasterization techniques. They managed to fake about 60-70% of what light actually does in those scenes will going for a mood or tone. But there's just no replacing actual light simulation. I noticed where it really shines is in indoor scenes, nighttime, and any location where old GI and ambient occlusion techniques would fail. It REALLY grounds objects in the world, and the effect it has on the NPCs is perfect. It removes that non-PT glow to them that always looked unnatural. It almost felt like they were unlit in certain circumstances.

[@Speed4Runs]

What glow?

[@slopedarmor]

@@Speed4Runs after 5:52 look at jackies chest and hand. You'll notice how its unnaturally evenly well lit from all sides, with light seemingly coming from nowhere. If you think about it, there should be some shadowing and his skin shouldnt be so bright everywhere, so it looks like his skin is glowing. Especially compared to the PT version. Unnaturally well lit objects are often referred to as glowing. Path tracing is also not perfect, shadows are pretty strong, could probably use even more bounces of light, but still looks great already.

[@Speed4Runs]

@@slopedarmor aaahh, I see what you/they mean with glowing, now... I was asking because there are some games where the character actually reflects light from nowhere and they glow with even bloom... To me, this looks like "shadows: off" settings :p I mean, they could have added at least a bit of SSAO, in the general space... But nope The funny thing is, everything else is overly dark on PS5

[@RicochetForce]

@@Speed4Runs Look at the character models of NPCs and what not in places that are supposed to be dark. They're NEVER properly dark. They always look like their contrast is wrong and stand out in a very odd way. That's why when you see them subject to realistic lighting in OD mode they look far better. To be fair, this is not limited to CP2077. Games in general make it so NPCs barely cast shadows, barely self-shadow, etc...

[@Speed4Runs]

@@RicochetForce I know some games that don't have this problem, even from PS2... But yeah, perhaps it's just something nobody cares about anymore

[@NicoTheBear64]

It’s only been 3 years and this game already looks like a remaster because of the lighting lol. Well done

[@morganvici6543]

Phenomenal pfp sir

[@Samrat74737]

Game was never ment to be played on ps4 they just the devs who launch on ps4 so they lost some potential and with glitches it ruins the launch of game. Now it's better and game is enjoyable. The details are not like rockstar type but game and story and city is enjoyable and full worth the money.

[@raffymytaffy]

I was exactly waiting for this video to come out

[@opalmermaid]

Hi man, what s setting are you using with 4080, i mean resolution, dlss and graphichs settings in generale.? Thanks 🙏

[@TremelJackson]

The 4080 looks amazing but they are both a step above what was release in 2020 for all platforms, congrats to cdpr on the clean up work.

[@TDR-0484]

It was fine on pc in 2020 if you had strong enough hardware

[@Kryptic1046]

That intro was epic. Good vid.

[@michalsavatar7]

I just purchased an RTX 4080 specifically to play CP2077 in Windows 10 Home, but I cant turn on DLSS frame generation. I think its because I havent got Hardware Accelerated GPU Scheduling turned on. The problem is, the option to turn it on in my display settings is not visible. It's nowhere to be found. Anyone know how I can make visible the option to turn on Hardware Accelerated GPU Scheduling, so I can access DLSS frame generation? I tried re-installing my GPU driver, I'm logged onto GeForce Experience. I've tried everything.

[@samplevi]

it should be in your graphics settings, that's where i turned mine on. also make sure you have one of the newest drivers to turn DLSS on in Cyberpunk

[@allenjay896]

Every detail i seein in path tracing is just god damn jaw dropping. From reflections to colored light bounces i feel like im in a movie.

[@drek9k2]

Only thing that looks better is water basically, at least on cyberpunk. I don't know how or why they fucked that up but it looks flatter and washed out somehow and just worse on RT outside of water and reflections, or the same like most of the time. It's like asking me the difference between HBAO+, only if the normal PS5 one was the HBAO+ enabled.

[@bigmanwildin2216]

It doesn't look that much better, lighting doesn't matter if the textures and polygon count aren't there. That's why Unrecorded looks better than this.

[@tuputamadre9770]

​@@bigmanwildin2216there is a lot of difference

[@abhirupkundu2778]

HBAO+ is very taxing, too much for a 500 dollar console@@drek9k2

[@abhirupkundu2778]

ever tried watching this video at 1440p or above? You would see the difference then. Textures and polygon count in cyberpunk are so high that even looking at a wall can reduce FPS depending on a GPU@@bigmanwildin2216

[@Kryptix0III]

$500 for an entire console vs $1200 for the GPU alone... pretty obvious what would win

[@Robin-tb3ql]

the pc wil ofc win, can't you see???

[@butchalini725]

Can’tI adjust this in color and dynamics settings?

[@johnswanson217]

All the bloom filters aside, color bit depth difference is so apparent.

[@IEBRASS11]

who would've thought a $1,500 graphics card is going to look better than a $500 console?

[@Swifto_Sweeper]

It’s just so you know

[@maximlar236]

And $3000 pc

[@Dipankar89]

RTX 4080 is $1000

[@Velly2g]

PlayStation is for poor people

[@maximlar236]

@@Velly2g I don't agree, for poor people there is an xbox series s

[@SuperPotato316]

With pathtracing enabled it's not even close but the PS5 still looks great, especially if you consider the price difference.

[@Jimmylovessalt]

What is path tracing again?

[@n.y.npache2646]

i don't see what is better , it just different , it feels more like a bad filter for me with PT

[@revengefulsouls5201]

@@Jimmylovessalt more accurate lighting I think

[@Rolkey]

@@JimmylovessaltLight renders and generates in real time and interacts with the game world more realistically, it’s the real version of ray tracing. It’s used in movie productions and things like that.

[@ssheen79]

Would either image affect your enjoyment. What does is the haptics.

[@PlayBoi-Bunny]

Is the rtx 3070 gaming x trio still good enough to run it 1080p ray tracing??

[@zen.lunatic1429]

i think its not. but if you open dlss would be enough

[@imranhossainrohit6990]

Path tracing makes everything look natural it is really good. Sad part is when I could afford to buy PC time will be limited for family and whatever

[@n.y.npache2646]

i don't see where it feels more realistic , on the contrary .. some shadow feels too dark on some part of the scene and it's like no shadows in other parts, definitly not realistic or me .. and when moving the head it changes colors strangely

[@ADOS_DSGB]

One machine is $500 the other is $3000.

[@Yuri-xx2gi]

One machine runs at 30fps (at best), way lower resolution, rt and graphical settings, the other doesn't Consoles are for poor people and that's ok, just don't act like you're smart for paying $500 to get the short end of the stick

[@kunidel]

У кибер панка 30 fps.

[@808LAND]

@@Yuri-xx2gi exactly! plus you can do way more with the gpu than just play games.

[@DiavoloGrenadine]

​@@Yuri-xx2gi 60 fps* High end PC are for 🐦

[@himyname1243432]

@@DiavoloGrenadine yeah spoken like a poor person with a console, cant even comprehend what a 4080 can do lmao thinking it caps at 60 fps lmaoooo

[@RookieGamerz-3110]

At 0:09 can we talk about how the cloth had better texture on 500$ hardware than a 2000$ pc build

[@keitkoppel2754]

What screen are you using for playing theese games ?

[@Cycu1]

Tv

[@SkemeKOS]

Hard to see a difference at first, but from about 1:30 in, I started to see a big improvement in lighting and reflections on PC version.

[@Cohen-]

But then weirdly enough at 1:43 the water droplets and overall color of of the scene is much better on the PS5. You see how nice the water droplets fall into the puddle. Why didn't that transition over to overdrive too? However overdrive is still experimental right so that could also explain it

[@PeterPauls]

@@Cohen- I have the same problem but it is fixable IMO. RT Overdrive aka. Path Tracing uses only Ray Tracing for everything and there are "too many" rays and especially at night the rays could make interesting artifacts. When you want to turn RT Overdrive on, there is a "technology demo" besides the switch so I can get over because in other scenarios it looks so much better. If I switch back to the "old" maxed out Ray Tracing settings, the puddles have no issues.

[@irecordwithaphone1856]

It's because this video is very mixed in the scenes it portrays. Some areas you won't see as much difference but others the difference is monumental

[@ivaniniguez2553]

For $3000+ no, it's not enough. lol ps kills it for $500

[@daniel7035]

@@ivaniniguez2553the value here comes at resolutions. The ps5 can do this at 1080 60 I’m pretty sure. At pc equivalent of high settings. Which is respectable. But a 4080 will do that at ultra in 4k at like 90 fps. At 1080p the framerate I think for a 4080 in 2077 I around like 160. There definitely come to be a point where you’re paying way more for incremental improvements in cards but 4070 and up those cards treat 4k like a morning jog

[@Schizm1]

Game is gorgeous regardless. Path tracing just adds and extra layer of "wow!" effect that shows us how the future games can look like. As a sidenote.. Every time I see CP2077 gameplay I remind myself how freakin amazing this game is.

[@drek9k2]

It literally looks better on the PS5. I know this is a tech demo, but still. The only reason to buy a new graphics card is because your GPU can't handle today's games at 1080p, or because you're upgrading to a 4k monitor. Buying a GPU just for raytracing is the stupidest thing imaginable. I've only even seen one area where RT looks hands down better and that's near the water, because Cyberpunk's raster water is really weird and messed up. But if you aren't overlooking the bay, it looks not much better between RT on and RT off, and in some instances like during the day in different districts I think it looks much worse with raytracing, almost like it's more washed out. I didn't expect to see the same probolems with Overdrive, which is everything looks "flatter" and more washed out with Overdrive on.

[@xPhantomxify]

This game is ass. The dialogue is cringe, full of F bombs for the sake of sounding cool or what Polish people imagine Americans to sound like. Lots of empty promises, nowhere near what was promised and hyped up about in the showcases leading up to the release. Story was mediocre as well. Night city is just an empty decor, theres nothing engaging going on, feels dead. CD Garbage Red sold out to China as well, when they said "we leave greed to others"

[@bubrub5564]

@@drek9k2 Keep lying to yourself. 4:07 5:22

[@absolutereality8350]

@@drek9k2 The water, the light, the textures, the details, everything looks better on a proper Nvidia GPU, you fucking clown

[@TDR-0484]

​@@drek9k2youre delusional if you think this looks better on ps5

[@HugoStiglitz88]

4:07 is the biggest difference I've seen so far. There the shadow quality and lighting of PS5 really hurts it's believability while the PC version looks unbelievable. also 6:00 the way characters are rendered definitely always looked off on the PS5 version

[@K3rhos]

Give it like 10 years and Ray Tracing will become the default method used to manage lighting in video games, rasterization will be a thing of the past and that's good for developers, no more time consumed to pre-calculate litghting in interiors etc... But at the moment, ray tracing is still way too heavy to handle even for an RTX 4090.

[@zayanalrashdr3948]

I think Devs should focus on pushing the image quality more than the ray tracing because it is just too powerful for any system but some alternatives are shown to be effective like unreal engine 5 Lumen

[@K3rhos]

​@@zayanalrashdr3948 That's the point of my comment, with the current tech this is too demanding but in 10 years it will become a standard because the hardware will be way powerful enough to handle ray tracing at decent framerate even for the low-mid range graphics cards. Lumen is nice but ray tracing tech is the future to get photorealistic graphics, it's good to have nice textures but if the light seems fake in your scene, you don't have the impression of having something photorealistic and immersive !

[@ianfitchett2768]

We're definitely a lot closer than a decade, and the 4090 handles this quite well. RT is moving at a rapid pace, it's not just about horsepower, it's about hardware optimizations and the latest rendering techniques, both are advancing simultaneously

[@donmike2810]

Lol 10 years? With dlss3 it's already here. People are already playing the tech demo on the 4090 if they have framegen + dlss on. Which other raytracing game can the 4090 not handle?

[@K3rhos]

@@donmike2810 Did you read my comment ? I said "default method", Ray Tracing is far from being used by everyone, and DLSS is basically trash, framegen are basically fake frames so nope. Not for me. I like the Ray Tracing tech but DLSS will NEVER equal the native resolution. When we will be able to play Ray Tracing on full native + 4K + mid range GPU we could talk about Ray Tracing being a standard. This is why I said 10 years, not everyone own a 2000$ GPU. It's the same when 4K screens has released, it has taken 10 years before people start buying 4K TVs like a default choice !

[@Aurummorituri]

You see where the fakery was very well done in certain scripted scenes and there is not much difference versus the RT with shadows and reflections. Others have massive differences. The scene with Jackie at the food stand was insanely different. Without RT he was glowing, but with RT the shadows made him look much more real.

[@8Bitzzz]

The glass reflected everything and it really looked much better in the scene than on the PS5

[@andrecroker882]

That is not Ray tracing. PS5 just didn't have contact shadow turned on

[@n.y.npache2646]

i'm referering to the same scene .. and i prefere the ps5 side from far ... on the right side the shadow are to dark in some area , and don't seem to apply in other parts .. not realistic for me .. feels like a weird filter

[@Aurummorituri]

@@n.y.npache2646 It’s “too dark” because that’s reality and you’re used to weak fake shadows. Most games have very unrealistic shadows with tons of light bleed.

[@TheColorfulPube]

The initial reflection is not RT.

[@aaronriggs4430]

A lot of the time I find myself turning it off and back on, to see if I actually think the image looks BETTER to me... sometimes it doesnt- the club especially. Sometimes RT OD (even with RR) denoises out a LOT of detail that standard RT mode doesnt.

[@bartfelix2949]

is your resolution down? ps5 version has less shimmering it seems, im actually suprised by how well of a job they did for the ps5

[@fiszu4075]

it's kinda depressing that even path tracing does not look good in some circumstances. Maybe because of how this game is made, or it's because of my rtx3070, but whenever I ride a car through the city it looks so bad. You can see strange blobs and artifacts, the road constantly changes from super reflective mirror to semi opaque with hard lines. We not there yet

[@keef78]

It a technical preview, it's in progress.

[@oceanedetotes]

tha's because it is not a definitive version of path tracing. In 6 months it will be better

[@tobiasjo1657]

How are you running this on an RTX 3070? You would need a lot of DLSS to get playable frames which would explain your artifects

[@antonkirilenko3116]

Or maybe because IRL lighting can look bleak sometimes. Path tracing is about getting to IRL behavior of light as close as possible. That doesn't always mean looking as impressive as possible.

[@fiszu4075]

@@tobiasjo1657 I get 40+ fps on DLSS quality, 1080p, all shadow settings set to medium, the rest is ultra. path tracing on. 1080p is the only option for 3070

[@piotrpp5478]

Shocking how well it looks on PS5! Definitely feel it is good enough for me.

[@Luki089]

Ps5 is much more expensive in the long run

[@maciekprokop3780]

​@@Luki089 😂 On ps5 you play for free. Just buy used games and resell. You lose like 10-20% of cash.

[@michaelyeboah7789]

​@maciekprokop3780 if own an rtx 4080 i'm cover for both current gen and next gen consoles. Which will both cost about 1200+. I dont have to pay for online gaming as on console. I get better and realistic graphix. Cost lot to build an high end pc but it covers you for about 3-4 console generations as the current gen console graphix is equivalent to rtx 2070 and not even rtx 2080 to talk of 2080ti which is two generations older in pc calender. On a long run it cost less building an high end pc

[@maciekprokop3780]

@@michaelyeboah7789 But the games on pc cant be resell

[@carlosgaleotegandara7812]

​@@michaelyeboah7789you have no clue what you talking about. Every console life span is the same as a high end pc and the 1200 price you came out out of your ass...lol gtfo Pc gaming will die in 10-20 years and this is the proof. 2000 bucks difference for barely any improvement? Good luck enjoyin getting robbed but hey,atleast yo can spit your super pc specs on forums

[@TheGabrielfaro]

6:19 the overdrive mode really makes characters looke more natural/realistic

[@MrRonski]

Good lighting is the key for amazing graphics.

[@kukuricapica]

I think that the real MVP here is the new A.I. techniques that allows you to run this path at playable framerate. We had discussion about that with my friends the other day and maybe this is the way forward in terms of performance/quality. Because realisticaly we are years away from playing these type of games in native resolution without any techniques like DLLS.

[@drek9k2]

The minute you can run games at native 4k144 is when FSR/DLSS/XeSS will be obsolete and quietely taken behind a shed and shot. I think nVidia is going to try and come up with excuses as to why you may find use for awhile but basically it's like any of their other dead technologies now, they don't even have SLI anymore, all the AA techniques and stuff people act like it never existed, will be the fate of upscaling.

[@robitmash]

​@@drek9k2 I concur that upscaling technologies are an abomination. As well as TAA. The jury is still out on frame generation but my experience with it on a 4070 ti lean towards it also needing to be put down. It really only has a benefit where there is a CPU bottleneck. Every new game release needs a big investment by Nvidia for hardware specific optimization

[@kukuricapica]

@@robitmash I agree that it would be better if we had hardware that could run this mode in native resolution in maximum quality but my opinion is that it's more realistic that the techniques like DLLS will evolve so much that once it can "fake" it well enough people won't give a fck that it's not native. I've seen article that some company is trying to fake ray tracing simply by using AI that will adjust lighting so our human eye things it's a real simulation. it's much faster too but s ofar it has mixed results. that may be the next thing...

[@GhettoPCbuilds]

@@robitmashDevelopers get to optimize for consoles, so I think it’s fair for Nvidia to negotiate deals in that front. I remember physx in borderlands and the Batman games that was a fun tech showcase back then.

[@GhettoPCbuilds]

@@drek9k2Moore’s Law, raw compute won’t go up too much but software and neural tech will yea

[@calisthenos8364]

I'd say that for having spent €500, I can be happy! I looked at the comparison, on sony bravia x90A 55 inch tv in 4k with hdr.

[@DosBlade]

Yeah its like night and day. So stuck on a PS5 duh most comments will be "I can kind of sometimes see a difference but PS5 is phenomenal. "... sure lets run with that. PC 4090 4k everything maxed on 65in HDR... yeah I LIKE IT! YES we also have a PS5 but.. really? Like downgrading when it comes to games like this. With out OVER DRIVE PS5.. just as good.

[@Speed4Runs]

The only thing worth of note, other than the water reflections, is 5:55, even though I'm not sure how much realistic him looking like James from Silent Hill 2 intro is. I mean, such strong and marked dark areas must need a quite directed and strong light from the top... What is it, midday?

[@slopedarmor]

yeah shadows seem a bit dark with pathtracing. I wonder if that would be automatically fixed by just adding more bounces. despite very strong shadows, PT version still looks leagues better there.

[@PeterPauls]

They are sitting under something which blocks the light. If sun can't reach them the only light that illuminates the character(s) are the ligh from the neons from behind or the food vendor's fire etc. I'm not sure that sunlight can bounce as much to reach them but definitely the Path Tracing looks much life like, the rasterized version is like the skin is glowing. Of course there are room for improvements...

[@MrTuneCrave]

Whats the track?

[@robertbolzicco9995]

Looks so much better than at launch. Amazing game.

[@irecordwithaphone1856]

To be fair on launch the game still looked pretty good graphically and all the artists work

[@danapaymardi]

Overdrive mode is jaw dropping. However it's more of tech showcase as it's not within 99 percent of gamers reach. And this goes to show how good gaming consoles are... Thoroughly optimized for gaming, truly purpose made. The system architecture of the PS5, its software and interface and ingenious design make this amazing performance possible.

[@lifeofeml]

I’m sure the game runs even better on the Series X when they did comparisons. On par visuals but better crowd population. These consoles are insane!

[@ajdaniel8128]

​@@lifeofeml PS5 beats the Series X in almost all recent titles now including the recently released Ghostwire Tokyo. Talking about native PS5 version. Not backcompat versions which don't count

[@lifeofeml]

@@ajdaniel8128 my point was that this game in particular that we are talking about (hence is being a video about the game in question) is getting praised for how well it holds up compared to a 4080. Yet it looks slightly better on Series X. Not by much, but having little differences such as a world filled with more people can make all the difference vs a few extra frames. Mostly these consoles are fairly matched. As an owner of both regularly switching you would not notice a difference. One has seconds faster loading time, one has 3-7 extra stable frames, one has slightly crisper visuals. But real world gaming when you are immersed in the gameplay, you won’t notice these differences. I did however notice the crowd population when I switched. It’s subtle but there.

[@waxdoe115]

​@LifeOfEML no... ps5 beats any console up to date. Series x and the controller was a dud. My Lil brother has it and I kinda idk feel bad for him.

[@lifeofeml]

@@waxdoe115 Series X is hardly a dud. It falls on which games you prefer to play. Gamepass has a fantastic library of games and some exclusives I personally love playing. PS5 has some of the best video games you can play as exclusives. But many people don’t care for those tittles. The issue with Xbox is no big AAA exclusives yet. The controller is fine. As a user of both I literally do not care for the haptic triggers. But, an innovative controller by Sony at least.

[@rambosausage8881]

They always look similar in these videos but when you see the PC graphics for real there is a huge difference....

[@GurnicoProductions]

The thing that still sets PC apart is the performance paired with the graphical bells and whistles. PC is just a smoother experience. Plus a game like this is eons better with mouse and keyboard. Other than that the new consoles really do well keeping up with PC.

[@ChiGyu620]

Eh, I played with a gamepad even on PC. Mainly because driving sucks with a keyboard and mouse.

[@nowayshay]

I prefer Pathtracing, 4k, 100 FPS over 30 fps, low RT, blurred image quality

[@Lordicus21]

no, overdrive are blurred

[@masoudfasihi4342]

I prefer 500 to 6000 dollars with this amount of visual difference

[@nowayshay]

@@masoudfasihi4342 $6000? Failed math in school? 4070 is $600. For that price you get triple digit frame rates at higher resolutions with full RT. If you're watching this vid on 1080p, you won't see much difference. YT compression further ruining the quality.

[@cxruptexternity]

​@@nowayshay you are forgetting the other components of a PC mate. You don't automatically have a PC with just a graphics card

[@deagle7602]

@@nowayshay u think the 4070 is a 4k GPU ? Lmao. 12gb is not enough for 4k. And I doubt it can do 4k 100fps ultra path tracing. U need a $1500 4090 to actually have an enjoyable experience with path tracing.

[@oceanedetotes]

I'm sure graphism will be better in the next patch on PS5, with better water reflections, better illumination and better shadows when FSR 3 will be realeased !

[@exoticspeedefy7916]

lol

[@oceanedetotes]

@@exoticspeedefy7916 not better than overdrive mode, just better on PS5 than in 1.62 version

[@ajdaniel8128]

PS5 only costs 399 Dollars. It's not even a comparison at this point. PS5 wins while even a PC that costs 6-10 times more still stutters in most recent AAA titles

[@Tanzu15]

@@ajdaniel8128 facts

[@vampiszon6620]

​@@ajdaniel8128this 💯

[@obiwan7191]

Its a last gen game but man im loving that rtx rain, looks amazing

[@bescimka7081]

I think it's a game that came out early because if the 4000 series was on time and the bugs were fixed, its name wouldn't be tarnished.

[@nitishaggarwal3739]

In next gen consoles they only added rt shadows, they should have added either RTGI or RT reflections instead of this

[@ArnikoGiri]

yes. RT reflections would have been better as they are immediately noticeable.

[@a2raya772]

stop calling them Next Gen, they are outdated..

[@oceanedetotes]

Yes but RT shadow is not full shadow and a lot of objects don't have any shadow. RTGI is impleted in The Witcher 3

[@TheDravic]

They implemented one technique because that's what they could budget for, and they chose Local Shadows. RDNA2 just isn't good at ray tracing, at all.

[@nitishaggarwal3739]

@@TheDravic But somehow insomniac pulled off hig quality RT reflections in both spider man games and ratchet and clank and it was damn impressive that too in native 4k, hats off for their implementation

[@davidleloup7108]

Finally it defends itself not so badly this ps5...

[@megaloth1955]

When you get older you realize that: A. it's basically just makes everything darker, and B. Unless it's absolutely minimum resolution jaggies-ville slideshow, you stop noticing or caring about all this stuff 2 minutes into the game.

[@spiritovich]

did anyone said that ray tracing mode on ps5 4k goes only 30 fps?

[@danny200mph5]

Considering the HUGE price difference in hardware. The PS5 did amazing.

[@Hells_Gift_MB]

The PC version is obviously better but the difference isn't worth the cost of the rig to run it

[@SameBasicRiff]

I mean not if you ONLY play cyber punk, but if you are not a very poor person and would generally have things like a nice TV with a console, a sound system, a living room couch, etc... then investing in a smaller monitor, desk, and PC is not really the stretch people think it is.

[@zbigniewsmyk]

Are you ill on head?

[@pilotsayshello1758]

@@SameBasicRiff you must be living off of your parents or some shit cause not everyone can just drop a ton of cash on a computer with a 40 series card, plus the essentials. get real lmao.

[@calisthenos8364]

Exactly, i think like you💪

[@elturro3308]

​@@zbigniewsmyk The small difference between ps5 and pc is appreciated by spending a few thousand dollars, to play well on pc you will always have to spend more if you can.

[@S0L4RFlare]

I think... NPC and indirect lighting get the most benefit.

[@NextgenPL]

70% of the time difference seems minimal, at times significant, but overall its still the same game with crossgen graphics, nothing mind blowing even on 4080 with path tracing.... Ps this moment with character on thumbnail yes it looks much worse on PS5 because lack of shadows on character, I dont know why( path tracing is not needed for that)

[@slopedarmor]

take a close up of a random npc in random place that is not a handcrafted setpiece of cinematic scene and the pathtracing will look way better. Cyberpunk is full of glowing npcs everywhere without path tracing, some exceptions for story characters. Too bad theres almost zero close ups of npcs or assets in this video. And if you look closely there is actually shadowing on jackies face on the ps5 after 5:52 , like his hair is casting a shadow on his face, there is shadowing in his eye sockets, under his nose, chin, some blotchy attempt at a shadow on his neck. Its just so subtle that its hard to see, and rasterization doesnt have beautiful smooth gradients between shadows. Shadows might be a bit too extreme on the path tracing version, maybe adding more bounces to the light would fix that. or maybe they put a friggin hero light over jackie. yeah they could make jackie look better with rasterisation in this scene if they put some artists on it, but I can already tell you that cyberpunks artists have already spend WAY more time on making the rasterisation look good vs making the path tracing look good. And npcs already look better with pt. with the path tracing you just put lights in ur scene and your done, no need to worry about drawing range of shadows, resolution of shadows, amount of shadows, which light will be lightcasting, which light will be shadowcasting, which objects will be shadowcasting, adding probelights, reflection/cube maps, worrying about light leakage or weirdly "glowing" objects or skin etc. Just put pathtracing in and every little grain of sand automatically has a beautiful per pixel shadow with gradients, if u were to zoom in on a grain of sand in the game. and alleys without light would automatically be dark, and the objects in the alley would be dark, sounds easy but without path tracing you need artists to put work in for that, and cyberpunk doesnt always get that right.

[@NextgenPL]

@@slopedarmor Your knowledge about graphics is way more complex than mine 😅so there is no point to argue with You, my point is that game could look much better on PS5 without pt, but anyway I get it pt doing the job easily Ps cyberpunk is definitely not good benchmark for a PS5 capabilities as a crossgen game firstly(the same with outdated Wither 3), secondly CDP graphics artists are not the best in the industry😅 Greetings!

[@nolongerhuman13]

@ 1:50. I have to give the rain FX and that puddle in the foreground to the PS5. I can’t believe I’m saying that. Firstly, rain doesn’t look like it does on the 4080. It’s TOO MUCH. The lighting and all look epic in the RTX and the ps 5 just nailed that puddle in the front from the jump

[@amdesilva36]

The main difference is that on PS5 I just have fun instead of spending hours getting mentally tired trying to configure a game

[@JASONzavr]

What about fps?) 30 on PS5 and 60 on PC?)

[@germansherman7707]

the main difference i can see is in my wallet 😂

[@mifunebrevar]

of course, 80$€ for each game leave you the choise to play only free to play games.

[@germansherman7707]

@@mifunebrevar WHAT?

[@MrQwertypoiuyty]

@@mifunebrevar Let me have what you're smoking. CD Project Red is giving out Cyberpunk for FREE now? I hope that's sustainable business.

[@trymefool2257]

​@@MrQwertypoiuyty nah his stuff special bro also I heard he got it from area 51

[@umartdagnir]

To sum up: not worth a $900+ graphics card or even an FPS drop if you've already got a 40 series card.

[@nolongerhuman13]

THIS is how COMPARO vids are DONE!!! It’s perfect. Not off angle. No guess work or timing not sync’d. I do think that ps5 only won in the “puddle department “ in the scene of 1:50. The rain and puddle on the ground up front. That’s all I can say. They will come for me in the night !

[@popior7063]

Rowniez sobie sprawdzilem ta technologie tyle ze na pc na rtx3060 i tak szczerze? Ok jest momentami ladnie czasem bardzo ladnie, czasem jednak mam wrazenie ze swiatla przypominaja efekt glow i sa za jasne - szczegolnie te sloneczne. Nie wspomne juz ze na mojej karcie dlss na preformance nie daje wcale za dobrych rezultatow. Technologia ciekawa ale w obecnej postaci ślepy zaułek. Ogladam pokazy z gry nawet na najmocniejszych obecnie kartach i widzac ile klatek zbija overide jest to przerazające. Teoretycznie zastępuje to prace grafików przy wielu aspektach gry ale jednocześnie wcale nie sprawia ze taka gra-benchmark jest czyms dostepnym. Patrząc na przykład na cieniowanie postaci to ja po prostu od premiery Ceberpunka widzialem ze jest to zawalone albo nie zrobione w tradycyjny sposob ktory dalby zblizone efekty. Jesli dobiero teraz postaci maja wlasciwe cienie to jak bardzo zawalil to zespol cdprojekt ,albo jak bardzo ten silnik jest toporny skoro tego nie dopracowali. Tak samo sytuacja odnośnie wody czy chociazby faktu ze nawierzchnie ulic czasem wygladaja lepiej bez rt niz z nim.

[@api3de]

ja na rtx 4070 w 1440p/i5 11400f z path tracing mam 60-80fps,więc bez przesady,to nie jest jakaś super mocna karta. można ją kupić już za 2900zł. dwa-trzy miesiące temu kosztowały tyle topowe modele rtx 3060 i to bez ti!

[@K2Orcus]

Меня бесят тупые пересветы уровня сфота из 2000х годов под видом HDR, РТХ порой выглядит отвратительно

[@AlexanderWake777]

Да, не считая отражений, которые без RTX именно в этой игре реализрваны плохо, во всём остальном с выключенным RT либо нет особой разницы, либо вообще ЛУЧШЕ и атмосфернее, чем с хвалёным RT. Ну а дождь с RT пути выглядит и вовсе убого, как в самопальном моде от ноунеймов.

[@srkoenma2947]

Hello ❤

[@johnrehak]

Consider the price jump of nvidia gpus from previous to curent generation, sooner or later majority of pc gamers endup buying AMD(if its cheaper) or consoles anyway. My prediction is that rtx 5080 gonna hang around $1500 MSRP and 5090 around $2k. And its only price of a gpu. If You add solid cpu, ram, mobo etc. It doesnt even make a sence to buy PC for gaming anymore.

[@balloonb0y677]

It’s not even about gpus anymore. 30 series cards were already powerful enough. It’s all about motherboards now. Without better architecture games will never get any better than this.

[@jmangames5562]

unlike consoles most PC gamers will only need to upgrade the GPU. I have a PC with a 7800x3d and a 3070 and I will upgrade to a 5070 and gain great performance! I built my PC around my budget than saved for almost 4 years I might even get the 5080 or 5090? PC's make way more sense than a console that is just a low end PC thats locked from you being able to properly optimize it for your games and needs performance mode up-scaling for 30+ fps.

[@danielsan9850]

Cyberpunk is one of those games that you need to experience with RTX on.

[@j0nnyism]

Wow both look great. I’d be happy with either

[@Vuradisuravu]

1:40 hehe~

[@NostalgicMem0ries]

miles better on ps5.

[@bitbat9]

@@NostalgicMem0ries yeah if you’re blind maybe

[@iDTecKt]

@@NostalgicMem0ries Cope 🤣🤣

[@NostalgicMem0ries]

@@bitbat9 more colors make me puke, darker imagine even looks sharper... so maybe fix your eyes

[@josetomascamposrobledano4618]

Great, I’m buying a PS5

[@atFanta]

DONT, game is bad on ps5

[@Marston-dj3xm]

Why​@@atFanta

[@DistructiveElements]

This is literally what ubisoft made this first watch dogs reveal look like😂

[@oceanedetotes]

if you stop at 3:20 you will se a lot of difference, more details and more light, more smoke etc.

[@destrozadorable]

Huge difference, would like to see the fps cause overdrive is very demanding

[@MichaelDoesLife]

It’s not worth it especially since the PS5 looks objectively better

[@mememanfresh]

@@MichaelDoesLife delusional take

[@maaax1173]

@@MichaelDoesLife Not sure if you're serious about this, but it is literally impossible to judge the looks of something objectively

[@Vlad-bu3mr]

@@MichaelDoesLife I have a ps5 and a pc with a 4080 so I can say without using KZbin compressed videos that..its great on PS5 but now the PC version is amazing and I set at the path tracing setup in the options and get a constant 90fps...I objectively believe the PC is better :)

[@lirycline6646]

@@MichaelDoesLife I think you’re on drugs lmao

[@batsGeracao]

Caramba, muito top essa RTX 4080, assistindo pela TV 4K percebe bastante diferença, que máquina linda RTX.

[@galaxyovert3601]

É uma placa de video fenomenal, o ruim é o preço da 4080

[@TheRUAS]

A placa é superior ao ps5 ,é muito superior no preço Tb se é que me intendem , nos 1:50 a chuva está melhor no PC ,mas o efeito dela no chão está bem melhor no ps5 ,reparem embaixo no canto direito perto do carro

[@nicane-9966]

the difference in quality and FPS is massive but so is the price.

[@mowtow90]

Guys , you cant compare iGPU (even tho its customized) to a Dedicated GPU. They are just in a diffrent league. 4080 just run circles arround RDNA2 and that is to be expected. There is a reason why that GPU cost 2 times the amount of the CPU and iGPU combined. What has to be taken into account here that the iGPU manage to a respectable job.

[@antiledimitri724]

PS5 is a beast. 399$ vs 1549$… At 1:41 I prefer PS5.

[@srt4874]

Pc looks better

[@maikbottcher795]

I don't find the graphic difference that big. I would rather be interested to know how many more passers-by the RTX4080 can display compared to the PS5 without falling short of the PS5's graphics level.

[@asianboss6355]

Rtx Better colours mate

[@krzysztofkubus937]

Price 😅😅

[@jeremyxo0]

Veo esto y me doy aun más cuenta del mérito que tiene rockstar por hacer correr un juegazo como red dead redemption 2 en ps4

[@Adam-xb8xh]

Overdrive is a strong difference for sure, but for the average person like myself, a £500 ps5 is more than enough ray tracing

[@ajdaniel8128]

PS5 starts at 399

[@PRS792]

Ps5 is a beast😮

[@eSKAone-]

Considering that PC costs 6x as much as a PS5 💟

[@eytbits]

and PC performs 6x better ;)

[@SuperPotato316]

@@eytbits not when there's shader compilation stutter ;)

[@eytbits]

@@SuperPotato316 ez fix by mods

[@SuperPotato316]

@@eytbits you can't fix shader compilation issues with mods. You have to wait for the developer to fix it for you.

[@eytbits]

@@SuperPotato316 this ain't console buddy. We have ways to fix it ;)

[@teabagNBG]

did my first playthrough when the game came out... i played on lowest settings/ resolution with a i7 8700k internal uhd gpu.... recently got me a 4060 for 300... i thought i would give it a try again after all the updates for the game... its just amazing! im glad i got me a 4060 instead of a ps5 LOL

[@Dipankar89]

The console literally looks like a joke. The image looks so flat on the PS5 Path tracing is truly awesome.

[@Kyepo]

They improved the rain

[@MichaelDoesLife]

They made it worse

[@adamsmith9410]

@@MichaelDoesLife Agreed. It looks gibberish. Path tracing is a marketing scam and only blind people fall for it.

[@TheOfficialJacksonville]

Cyberpunk on the PS5 looks pretty good... but it also looks good on a $500 PC with a used 3070 (yes, this is now possible). The PS5 only uses local shadows for it's ray tracing (so does the Series X). Would've loved it if they gave you the option, though, to play at 1080p with all ray tracing settings on. I wouldn't prefer it over 4k rasterized, but it'd be nice to have. Nicer to have than giving up 60fps for basically nothing.

[@webz2k]

Got to give it to the consoles. You can get ps5 digital for a quarter of the price of just the 4080 without the rest of the PC! Very impressive how close they are considering.

[@jhonnyx161]

Al final del vídeo, en la fiesta ,con una serie rtx 4000 no se ve así de mal , se ve llena de luces y efectos dinámicos por todos lados 😉

[@sakuragod6813]

Tolera

[@SuperPlastered]

Amazing how well the PS5 holds up. I have a 4080 and I'm wondering why I bought it after seeing the ps5.

[@ianfitchett2768]

Well you're getting double the fps, better upscaling, and dramatically better lighting quality, this comparison video did a fucking awful job at picking scenes to highlight the actual differences. Picks 80% directly-lit landscape shots, which need zero rtx to render, to showcase rtx differences. Top it off with literally not one single scene of what you see more than anything else in the game, walking down a street being lit purely by area lights and no sunlight, which is one of the lighting scenarios you actually need RTX to render. Totally misleading "comparison".

[@DosBlade]

Please.. can we brown nose any more

[@DosBlade]

hahe cute.. but no offense speaks volumes on how smart you are regarding this. PS5 running Cyberpunk what did they say about it? LIMITED RT.. understand that? Really? A 3080 , 4070 struggle with RT maxed. So you think a PS5 that basically has a 3060.

[@brawnwizard3073]

​@@DosBlade man dont be technich guy ps5 is 1060 or 780 who is care i had series x it was rokhet i was like you think ohh 3060 ti is better than sx by 4 teraplohs pc is better but what we saw last year most games like hg legacy are better on consles andeven there is 16gb vram 3060 ti lamo is 8gb and build pc with this will cost you 1000 2000 us while sx and ps5 500 and play many games on machine made for games not that pc when i set on trash gaming chair front monitor and keyboard mouse i played pc since 2004 and i hate it for gaming no matters how it is powerful where is comfortability

[@krspy1337]

@@DosBlade its a bit better actually, its rx 6700 xt

[@jacobrnstedt1526]

ps5 not bad pretty good

[@janithsachintha3620]

This made me appreciate my PS5 even more.

[@muxalychgames7339]

Interesting in future look on that comparison ps5 pro vs rtx 4080 if on ps5 pro release graphics patch

[@richardcollis5576]

Digital foundry makes a far better comparison.

[@MichaelDoesLife]

Then go watch those nerds

[@srkoenma2947]

​@@MichaelDoesLife Tito

[@danielweiss4498]

It is crazy how similar they look

[@artorias4849]

Cope

[@Jonniinglish]

Мне кажется, что в некоторых местах 4080 выглядит не очень корректно потому что сейчас разработчики вынуждены делать двойную работу. Рисовать с RTX и без него! И скорее всего многие модели, куда искусственно добавлено затенение ещё больше затеняются RTX и выглядят слишком мрачно или наоборот, слишком засвечеваются и так светлые места. Я думаю, что разрабы не стали заморачиваться и чистить все модели всей игры для того чтобы технология работала чисто.

[@raptr394]

Никто не рисует с rtx ... Технология добавляет свет, лучи, отражения... Это ии который работает само

[@toninhopavan2]

Cyberpunk is the only game I prefer playing with ray tracing on ps5 because it looks so good.

[@JLeeCN]

I think the big difference between the two is really going to be performance. The 4080 is going to feel waaay smoother

[@13zveroboy89]

No.

[@sparkitup531]

@@Table__top Not in full 4k on the ps5, stop.

[@XGN05]

@@Table__toplol no it's 1440p using DRS which means it will go even lower.

[@robertwalker3357]

I think horizon forbidden west looks better

[@JLeeCN]

@@Table__top Sorry but thats wrong. The PS5 cannot handle native 4K60. In almost all AAA titles it renders at lower resolutions like 1440P or 1200P and upscales the image to "near 4K". PS5's hardware is already several generations old compared to PC, it cannot compete.

[@maciejkowalski6616]

Z zaprezentowanego materiału jakoś mam wrażenie, że na PS5 wygląda lepiej. Abstrahując od tego, co jest bardziej "poprawne", na PC gra w wielu scenach jest za jasna, szczególnie w cieniach, co trochę psuje klimat całości. Sam gram na PC i nie zauważyłem, żeby było coś nie tak, ale na tym porównaniu widać to jak na dłoni. Tak więc nie jestem pewien, czy RT wygląda lepiej. Na pewno wygląda inaczej. W wielu miejscach bardziej podoba mi się obraz bez TR, bo wygląda bardziej naturalnie. Pewnie to dlatego, że gra nie była projektowana z RT od samego początki i nie zawsze oddaje ono pierwotną i spójną wizję artystyczną. Na + na pewno jest szczegółowość odbić w RT, bo to najbardziej rzuca się w oczy. W sumie to nie miałem pojęcia, że gra na PS5 wygląda aż tak dobrze.

[@techgregory5253]

Jestem zgodny

[@ryszardzokowski812]

Mam dokładnie te same odczucia co do gry. Na pc osobiscie wole grać bez RT , bo obraz jest ostrzejszy i odbicia jak dla mnei wyglądają lepiej.

[@api3de]

to jest zupełnie błędne odczucie,specjalnie tak dobrano scenerię,żebyś tak pomyślał,ja mógłbym zrobić to samo w drugą stronę,z path tracing na żywca jest genialny,no i mam 60-80fps,czego tu nie zobaczysz na yt. ogólnie grafa na pc jest dużo lepsza,ale to widać w wysokiej rozdzielczości i nie na youtube. tak czy siak na ps5 jest super,a ta gra wygląda genialnie nawet w detalach low...

[@13zveroboy89]

Of course you feel it guys with all respect to Poland - gameplay in this game is still piece of crap.

[@Arhatu]

Ray tracing has a beauty factor but in terms of gameplay experience it is less than %1 for me. I notice it the first 2 minutes and sometimes I can't feel the difference then I forget to turn it on.

[@yeonsharien]

the marketing is telling us that want to afford gaming laptop to choose ps5 this year.

[@FounderX9]

It's amazing how well the PS5 holds its own against the PC version, almost can't tell them apart minus frame rate, hopefully we get a PS5 Pro soon

[@ommimi152]

imo he should compare it with the top 5 most used gpu on steam, but then nobody will watch it 😂

[@suparibhau]

@@ommimi152 that includes 3060ti and 3070 which would run the game pretty well

[@ajdaniel8128]

PC was stuttering a lot in this video which makes PS5 the better performing version

[@trymefool2257]

​@@suparibhau thats not true you should check again cause last time I checked it was lower end cards lmao on steam btw

[@suparibhau]

​@@trymefool2257 It is true, how hard is it to make a 5 sec google search?