Amber Heard's lawyer asks psychologist hired by Johnny Depp about muffins

Johnny Depp Amber Heard trial: Amber Heard's lawyer questions Dr. Shannon Curry, the psychologist hired by Johnny Depp, about muffins bought by Dr.Curry's husband. The clinical psychologist hired to review Amber Heard and Johnny Depp 's relationship earlier claimed that the actress suffers from two personality disorders - and pointed out that symptoms of the disorders include 'taking on the personality' of loved ones and 'dressing like them' - days after Heard was accused of copying her ex-husband's courtroom outfits.
#JohnnyDepp #AmberHeard #JohnnyDepptrial #DeppHeard #muffins
Daily Mail Facebook: / dailymail
Daily Mail IG: / dailymail
Daily Mail Snap: / daily-ma. .
Daily Mail Twitter: / mailonline
Daily Mail Pinterest: pinterest.co.uk/dailymail
Get the free Daily Mail mobile app: dailymail.co.uk/mobile

[@dailymail]

Did you catch this bizarre exchange as it happened?

[@bleepbloop1898]

mffuin

[@polishlass5067]

I did

[@PinkyakaAyannaj]

Yeppers

[@Jose_Jalapeno]

Yes!!.. Mega pints and muffins for everyone.👏👏

[@clairewilliams3081]

Yes I did and it was hilarious, the woman is on more drugs than both of them put together.

[@Rugelacharugula]

That psychologist was a BOSS. She was articulate. She was qualified. She was explicit. She was unflappable. SHE BROUGHT MUFFINS.

[@clapostrophy]

NOPE, her HUSBAND brought the muffins! When I learned one thing from this case thus far it is unarguably that!

[@michaelzuma]

@@clapostrophy NOPE, actually ACTUALLY 😄… her husband BOUGHT the muffins (my guy 🙌🏾) and SHE BROUGHT the muffins. This muffins angle is just ridiculous. 🤣

[@maikwokwik9739]

read that one word wrong...oopsie

[@rickrolled3666]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/p4CmdGaId9-BqK8 Finally its here.

[@heneraldodzz4978]

Her husband was the muffin man

[@wasifiqbal9984]

Imagine trying to pull psychological tricks on a psychologist.

[@GabrielleTollerson]

ikr

[@mangalover0149]

Yup... Pure stupidity.

[@HAHA-kk2xy]

Lol

[@warnerbros1830]

Uno reverse card

[@manishasen1400]

Lol.. destroyed

[@GiggleGlide7]

Man that objection shut that lawyer down COMPLETELY. She was so shaken that she started asking inane questions, for example, about muffins. Props to Dr. Shannon Curry for keeping as straight a face as she could after such a question. I personally would have laughed my ass off and need a moment or two to come back down.

[@jedell]

It’s hilarious to me they can shout “objection hearsay” all day long but they get upset when there is an objection against then

[@matwatson7947]

You should do an Isaac Baruch and just openly laugh at the stupidity of the question.

[@dumiduhasaranga2739]

Issac Bharuch actually did that. He lost it and started laughing at this lawyer 😂

[@UnscrupulousAgitator]

😂 5:04 took her forever to come up with "but that shows bias". So long that I thought she was trying to figure out what new things she was going to talk about.

[@Mybpeterson]

@@UnscrupulousAgitator A trial lawyer has to be able to think on their feet. Elaine can't do that to save her life. She has a script that she wrote in advance and she's sticking to it. When Elaine gets an objection she didn't expect, she doesn't know what to do. There was a very simple solution to the "bias" objection. All Elaine had to say was "have you ever testified negatively toward someone who hired you." It's a sneaky question because it doesn't mean that Dr. Curry never held a negative opinion of a client, only that she didn't testify about it. No lawyer would call a witness that undermines their case. If Elaine had adjusted her script then bias could've been implied. Instead she looked incompetent and bolstered Dr. Curry's testimony. Elaine supposedly she has a great reputation, but I'm certain it's because she settles so many cases before trial. She can't perform in a courtroom.

[@stoneskinreb]

This is what happens when a stupid person tries to slander someone who's intelligent. I'm honestly impressed at how bad Amber Heard's lawyers are, it's incredible.

[@r.p.8906]

exactly my comment. so sad to see that these people are in fact licensed attorneys.

[@wyskass861]

Lawyer isn't necessarily stupid, but when you take on a case with no real defense, you try some pathetic methods to get paid, and get an impression of being so. Hence most lawyers don't want to take on losing cases to preserve their reputation and not having to stoop to weak arguments making their lawyering look bad.

[@inutero10]

Thats her job homeboy. It aint personal but it sometimes seem that way.

[@Draize]

My favourite line, "May I clarify what occurred so that we can stop talking about the muffins?" Perfectly said.

[@GamePhysics]

*Lawyer continues to talk about the muffins*

[@NuncNuncNuncNunc]

"But didn't you say..." "No!"

[@dagordon1041]

Okay already - enough with the muffins.

[@alexanderwindh4830]

Brilliant. Just goes to show how corrupt the law system is when Muppets like this one can be a celebrity lawyer

[@frnd4fauzi]

Time:?

[@CsehCsaba]

If I were a lawyer, I wouldn’t try to fool a psychologist with cheap mind-tricks. This lawyer is a duffer.

[@Why-are-you-reading-this]

That’s why you are not.😛

[@_xanthe_1698]

@@Why-are-you-reading-this tf?

[@bartholomew1096]

@@Why-are-you-reading-this L

[@ariefyazid2399]

@@Why-are-you-reading-this so according to your commet, does lawyer usually does this cheap mind tricks?

[@yogurt4785]

@@Why-are-you-reading-this 🫥

[@wasntme9578]

That lawyer is so outclassed, outwitted and definitely out of her league here. This is going to do so much damage to her career. She took a high profile case that she was unprepared to handle.

[@joshscott5213]

Ya and she's trying to use basic got ya ticks on psychologists isn't going to work

[@wasntme9578]

@@joshscott5213 Exactly!

[@chrish4439]

The lawyer also has this snarky I'm smarter than you attitude which just makes her being a dunce so much more hilarious 😂

[@FinleyLava]

I mean, I don't want to defend her, but she probably doesn't have much to work with xD

[@wasntme9578]

@@FinleyLava True story.

[@maliaeugene6906]

She wasn’t hired by Johnny Depp or his lawyers, she is hired by the court to testify on the facts, that will fall one way or the other. She even testified to that on the stand when being questioned by Amber’s attorneys. In this case, it is beneficial for Johnny and not for Amber

[@wasntme9578]

Yes she was. Expert witnesses are paid for by which ever side brings them in. So if Depp loses the case, he has to pay for it. If he wins then it comes out of the settlement. The attorneys initially pay for them but they get paid back one way or another. What she testified about was that she will give the facts unbiased as a professional. You only have her word for that. She gets paid no matter what she gives as testimony.

[@maheephoenix4398]

@@zlmdragon. so is that muffin question is to ruin her credibility as a Psychologist?

[@maheephoenix4398]

@@zlmdragon. why your (Dr Curry’s) husband brought Muffins for Amber Heard? I don’t quite understand why Amber’s lawyer asked such question.

[@vanessaspeaks]

@@maheephoenix4398 psychologists are not allowed to disclose who their patients aren’t without permission so if she had told her husband who she was bringing the cupcakes for, she would have violated patient confidentiality

[@skylerfelix7609]

@@vanessaspeaksAnd the point of the questioning was to imply that “omg I’m on the Johnny Depp case and I’m gonna tell people”.

[@Samuel.U]

I love how the abrasive lawyer is trying to mislead the psychologist into agreeing with her by using trick questions, but is failing miserably and keeps getting corrected. Does she not realise that this lady is literally a doctor of the mind?🤣

[@PinkyakaAyannaj]

I don't think she has realized this yet

[@user-ze2yx3xs6p]

I'd liken it to a snake questioning an owl

[@Opticillusion160]

thats the job of a defense attorney… they have a difficult task to try and persuade the jury and provide enough evidence against johnny, they know this. The attorney is doing her job

[@beecee921]

@@Opticillusion160 very poorly

[@Samuel.U]

@@Opticillusion160 Oh you're 100% correct, but I'm sure we can all appreciate how well Dr Curry is handling herself, right? 🤣

[@UmbralDweller]

Only Amber could believe a husband picking up his wife's muffins is a narrative that actually revolves around herself.

[@loritalbot3063]

She's desperate !

[@lindasmith1105]

Did her husband go with her for dinner and drinks at JDs house? She wasn't hired yet so did she tell him where she was off to all dressed up? He'd have to be brain dead not to know and yes if someone told me that there husband bought these muffins for you and me, I'd assume it meant me. They should have vetted her more. Amber's doctors are going to have a field day with her testimony.

[@fabiofaria3434]

Facts! Lol

[@multifan6679]

@@lindasmith1105 this isn't her first high profile client, her husbands knows how the game runs and he also knows that she isn't allowed to say anything concearning her clients...I think he should trust her enough by now. Also, where did she state that her husband was with her during the dinner? And just because someone says "someone brought muffins (for you)", wouldn't make me assume that he brought them knowing who I am. As she already stated, he brought the muffins for them, but only knowing that it was a high profile client based on the fact that they had to clear the office. Again, he should know the rules of confidentiality by now very well

[@lindasmith1105]

I guess your right. I don't know. I watched a video with Dr. Grande he brought up a lot of points. Also on court to they had a body language expert in who said she was not telling the truth or hiding something when she was asked if she told her husband about Amber. I'm sick of this whole thing been home with covid too long. I go to therapy and trust is a huge issue for myself. Her diagnouses was too perfect

[@RumbleFish69]

Psychologist: "May I clarify what occurred, so we can stop talking about the muffins?" Lawyer: "Your honor, at this time I'd like to call the muffin on the witness stand..."

[@MysticLGD]

Dangit I was waiting for that...

[@harleenkaur3006]

😂😂

[@abigailmerton5073]

As someone who is getting their masters in forensic psychology, this woman (Depp’s team’s retaining psychologist) handled this so beautifully and we are currently studying her as a model for how we should handle cross examination. Well done👏🏻

[@Ro-Ghost]

I'm taking a class on how to become a clown, and Elaine is my inspiration she's truely a master at the craft

[@TexasRoast]

Just let this be a lesson to you all that any muffins you choose to provide can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to retain your muffins.

[@belle3168]

Well shoot I guess gotta bring in cookies now.

[@RaqRedOX]

Miranda Muffins.

[@jessicaunknown3510]

🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂😵‍💫

[@naveenkataria661]

I was looking for comment of this sort 😅

[@jerry2806]

If you can't afford muffins then some will be appointed to you 😆

[@taylordavis1270]

The way that this psychologist absolutely schooled this lawyer, just gives me absolute joy lol.

[@amylee0870]

The attorney is so arrogant and intentionally difficult, it makes the psychologist's handling of the situation even sweeter to watch.

[@Olivqa22]

Yes !

[@zedx4013]

@@amylee0870 yeah , her face at 4:46 tells everything 😂

[@whiteegger2565]

@@amylee0870 I mean, she is not arrogant. She is trying her best.....when there are so many evidence against your client a laywer can do nothing else but be extremely difficult.

[@xGwadx]

The way that this phycologist looks makes me :)

[@jf8138]

The way she got stumped so bad, after her question got objected, was HILARIOUS. After that wasn't allowed, she fell apart. Clear example of a stupid person. This lawyer is a joke and ruined her entire career through this single line of questioning. You can see Johnny Depps lawyers smiling and whatnot, because they know this just got a lot easier.

[@irenedove2881]

To be fair she is trying to defend something the whole world saw happen..she def defaimed him..i honestly wonder how the first trial was lost..i mean i know defamation is hard to prove but come on....tbh i think the lawyer should use this bpd histrionic diagnosis to her advantage..in defamaition you have to prove the person knowingly lied on you but the dr said it's questionable how much she can take responsibility for anything at some point...maybe that's an easier out...if she can't take responsability and is a pathological externalizer of blame without realizing she may very well believe that he was the abusive one.

[@irenedove2881]

Oh wait amber said on audio she was rhe one who is abusive...i dunno...i have no idea how they won in uk

[@vintagearisen]

@@irenedove2881 I think in the UK Depp was suing a gossip rag and not Amber Heard herself.

[@irenedove2881]

@@vintagearisen ahhhh thaaank you! That makes so much sense

[@wendyleeconnelly2939]

I almost feel bad for the lawyer, who is clearly bumbling stumbling and losing face trying to scramble up a line of reasoning. Bet she wishes she never took the case.

[@batmama739]

I genuinely wish I could stay as cool as this woman. She holds herself with such class. You cant tell what she’s directly thinking, even though we all know she thinks this lawyer is a moron 🥲

[@NighDarke]

That lawyer was trying so hard to discredit the psychologist but all she did was make herself look stupid.

[@blondies7746]

Absolutely AM s lawyers keep asking everyone the same questions in different ways multiple times to try and get them to slip up and discredit them create reasonable doubt. A kid straight of law school could do a better job then these lawyers, I’ve never seen lawyers like this before Objection hearsay lol they sound ridiculous

[@shanedaley6236]

She even tried to describe amber but ended up describing Johnny being abused and the lawyer doesn't realize she actually asked those questions hehe

[@melissaduhon1890]

I sooooo agree!!!

[@adamfurtaw915]

But you have to admit, she did it well.

[@KarmaTube5]

@@adamfurtaw915 the baker is the muffin man. Muffin man: JD finger does not exist

[@slygunslinger]

Johnny’s lawyers: “Amber attacked him with sustainable injuries and proof of false accusations and blackmail”. Ambers lawyers: “muffins”

[@spiritualdiva4673]

Lol

[@guysumpthin2974]

You would think the muffins were involved in a murder , that the muffins were the murder weapon, or if the muffins exploded and killed someone , there would’ve been less questioning about the muffins

[@NgatiDreadz]

Do you know the muffin man?

[@josephbentley6591]

@@NgatiDreadz The muffin man?

[@caspian1509]

🤣🤣🤣

[@imnotimportant]

it is hilarious that this lawyer thinks she is the smartest person in that room, and the entire room is laughing at her when she asks the most absurd questions and tries to twist the Psychologists words. Its clear that everyone in the room knows what she is trying to do, and how bad she is failing at it

[@kadesclawz]

the fact she brings muffins for her patients is so adorable to me

[@0351nick-ch8ee]

This psychiatrist is a better attorney then Amber turds lawyer....

[@regant.cameron8237]

Psychologist But YES

[@hillerymagrobi8990]

Well spotted!! LOL

[@PrecisionCalc]

Its only because Amber has no defence. Shes guilty

[@NamarieValimar]

Ahhh amber turds 😂

[@Michael020]

To be fair, the lawyer has so little to work with, she is reduced to this nonsense... I imagine that lawyer,is thinking her career is dead after this You get the feeling depps lawyers are laughing at heard lawyers

[@claracatlady9844]

Imagine trying to play manipulative mind games with a psychologist 😂

[@profdocjones2679]

Or the "who's more charming" game with Johnny Depp xD

[@kathyo5971]

@@profdocjones2679 ? Please

[@tristanmagnus1964]

This psychologist isn’t Harley Quinn so I don’t know why this lawyer insists on acting like a Joker.

[@stevejones69420]

@@tristanmagnus1964 because that lawyer's a clown

[@s.z.x.01]

@@stevejones69420 that makes sense lol

[@JuanR-mm1uk]

Lawyer: “ Who brought the muffins?” Psychologist, “ The muffin man” Lawyer, “ the muffin man?” Psychologist, “ Yes!!! The muffin man!!!”

[@girlyfriendston3503]

Would you agree that it is a FACT that the muffin man resides on Drury Lane?

[@KennedyLawOfficesScranton]

Do you know the muffin man?

[@EclecticallyEccentric]

"Well, she's married....to the muffin man."

[@willierjohn]

Hahahaha

[@catinheels88]

Next they'd bring the Muffin Man on the stand haha

[@DiscoCatsMeow]

Even a year later this is so fun to watch again.

[@IamtheTolle]

Lawyer: You told your husband correct? Psychologist: No Lawyer: But you told your husband correct? Psychologist: That is still incorrect. I really feel like the lawyer wanted to try a third time.

[@martindebrois1472]

What's great is she was BLUFFING that they had her conversation, with her husband - Dr. Curry called her on it and they DON'T ! ... And the jury saw it.

[@Sazbot]

😂

[@justapillow2443]

Needed all the strength they could muster to not think "Third times the charm"

[@NOONE-fh1um]

she rly thought she'd change her mind

[@PWNnannee]

“That you’re incorrect is correct” gotttttem

[@carolinarouzaud]

She is the definition of what people call “beauty and brains”

[@BJenno]

Most definitely

[@WakaFlakaFlame777]

Absolutely!

[@Victory1007]

She's very lovable, charismatic, and is paid in muffins

[@gabrielaart1]

Absolutely!

[@whiterose-kb9lk]

Yea she's the whole package!

[@kenzoebong4180]

“You’re incorrect that is not correct” has to be the truest statement I’ve ever heard lmao

[@calumsanderson6741]

"Objection: speculation." "That's not speculation." she says as she realises it's speculation.

[@avsambart]

I need to learn how to talk like her. She's so accurate and very careful how she speaks and how she confirms information. Ugh amazing.

[@springiscoming_]

wow, I thought the same😮👌🏻

[@Camothor10]

Just think before you speak and say it in your head before you say each word

[@irishboyrants8086]

@@Camothor10 My guy, it’s called sarcasm!

[@robm9674]

@@irishboyrants8086 She's talking about the psych... who IS very accurate and careful how she speaks. Was not sarcasm. Maybe you should take OP's advice as well, my guy!

[@JinMori07_]

@@irishboyrants8086 maybe take the guys advice

[@foekist7312]

What's hilarious is that they're playing mind games with a psychologist... a forensic psychologist of all people

[@usurper4081]

Exactly lmfao

[@sladejosephwilson2300]

Money makes people stupid and desperate

[@DMDMDM01]

Don't mess with someone whose career is studying people

[@scarley5661]

😂😂 true she’s sooo calm

[@furiyara]

This ^

[@Whoami691]

Imagine having so little evidence that THESE are what you must resort to.

[@Sirens.Lullaby]

They're trying to question the psych's credibility and bias 1. Asking if she would be here if she had found anything in Depp that would negatively impact his chance in the case; unanswerable at this stage, saying yes would mean she didn't find anything "wrong", saying no would give the opposition leverage as it creates doubt in the client's stability and claims 2. The muffins. The vague implication of "my husband got these for us" is he knew exactly who would be eating them, as if she had told her husband who she was meeting with; this would discredit her as untrustworthy in the case for sharing confidential information 3. Trying to make her seem like she's lying. Previously-at the beginning of the clip, she had said she does not often meet with high-profile clients. During the description of the muffins story, she says "we have to clear the office when we have high-profile clients, as we often do." the vague implication being she has a lot of high-profile clients when the obvious meaning is that the office she works in often has high-profile clients.

[@SB-bh8bg]

A witness can be treated as "hostile" but these lawyers can behave deplorably and disrespectfully all day long.

[@adamsheriff2468]

Huh? Can you rephrase that, what I understand is that you said witnesses are dealt with in a hostile way, then you said “but”, that’s what I don’t understand. If a witness is being treated hostile that means the lawyers are being disrespectful to them.

[@Sjieraffe]

@@adamsheriff2468 I think the laywer is very manipulative also in her tone and voice . This Psychiatrist is really wise in her responds

[@jv-ep2tc]

a hostile witness is declared so that an attorney can ask questions that otherwise might be considered "leading"

[@lowrld9716]

Hearsay

[@ultimateninjaboi]

Thats not what hostile means in the context of witnesses. i mean, yes, screw this lawyer. But "hostile witness," doesnt mean the witness is being aggressive, belligerent, or otherwise disrespectful. It means their testimony is in some way opposed to the position of the party who is calling them. Typically more likely to be lying or misdirecting.

[@stuffnuns]

One could tell this psychologist was being very careful about how she answered the questions. She was trying to answer correctly and accurately. The defense was going for the “gotcha” question, but there were no muffins there.

[@LeviAck178]

I know right. You can’t use psychological tricks on a psychologist 😄

[@huginug]

@@LeviAck178 she could see everything form a mile away, it's an impressive skill

[@georgesdebbas9157]

Yeah the psychologist did muffin wrong.

[@D-Z321]

There were muffins there.. just not for Amber. They were for everyone.

[@zetaminor77]

Notice how the psychologist was quick to answer, “you are incorrect” instead just answering, “no” when Amber’s lawyer was trying to get the witness to agree she said/did something

[@fuloran1]

As an attorney, never ever ask a question you don't already know the answer to. This is especially true when you have no clue what you are actually doing.

[@skylerfelix7609]

Elaine knew the answer though. Technically… the husband knew a big client was in the office. But he didn’t know who it was. Heard’s team tried to manipulate the jury into thinking Curry told her husband she was testing Amber Heard. Had Curry said “yes, my husband knew a client was coming in” Elaine would’ve moved onto another topic because she got her yes answer. And Depp’s team would’ve had to redirect and clarify the muffins story. All in all some horrible tactics employed by Heard’s team.

[@dislecsyk991]

*wildly speculates* "Objection, speculation" "That's not speculation!" What the hell 😂😂😂

[@lari9607]

"That goes to bias your honor" LMAO

[@lorainelopez3255]

The fact that a lawyer wants to go against what a judge says is astronomical.

[@jordannickles6114]

If someone doesn’t send this woman a basket of muffins that says “my condolences” after the trial ends then I will be sorely disappointed Edit: So are we sending blueberry or chocolate chip? 🥳

[@loserliz5937]

AHH ME ME I WILL

[@bluesord114]

LMFAO BRO START A GO FUND ME I'LL DONATE FOR A BIG ONE HAHAHAA

[@genxx2724]

I think she’s done with muffins.

[@sylviasmith5045]

But more importantly "weren't they really hash brownies not muffins and this would have led to AH having a incorrect assessment" correct.

[@johnpossible6292]

After this trial... what man is ever gonna want to go near her. Muffins mite be the only thing she can eat. If ya no what i mean

[@sneaky6ix]

This is not a tactic you employ against a psychologist. It's not even a tactic you should employ as a lawyer. Council got owned.

[@its_nuked]

Hi, i have literally never looked at court stuff before and am slightly lost, why do people keep talking about a tactic? What was her strategy?

[@Craeonkie]

@@its_nuked She would purposely do some tricks that are only used as a last resort, such as asking questions like "Do you think A AND B?" Even though the psychologist only thinks A and not B but because the psychologist is, well, a psychologist, she's able to evade these sort of traps

[@craftyoldhaeg]

@@its_nuked The bottom line is that it’s unfortunately more about how the information is presented than what the information is. So attorneys will have a plan to ask questions in a way that frame their argument in a positive light. This lawyer is attempting to attack the doctor’s credibility and make her look like a fame seeker vs a legitimate doctor, therefore make the jury question her credibility. This is a very tacky and sexist approach. More typically, a lawyer would try and poke holes in the way the science is applied, look for mistakes, or if they’re being petty, question their professional qualifications. Suggesting this lady is a fame mongerer was very below the belt and backfired. Just anecdotally, (not a legal professional) I’ve seen heavy handed approaches in a lot of cases from the 80s and 90s. It seems like something that perhaps resonates better with older generations, but in today’s world, it doesn’t really fly. Especially in this scenario, where a defendant is trying to paint herself as a feminist hero, yet her defense team is attacking a female doctor in a very sexist and disrespectful way.

[@pt4005]

How the wording is structured and manipulated can cause answers to work in the lawyers favour. However, one of the people who wouldn’t fall for this is a psychologist. She should have known better but I guess thenlawyer was clutching at straws and then just got school by the dr

[@pt4005]

Also the lawyer is doing her best to discredit the professionalism and qualification of the witness. Here she tries to imply that the psychologist was so starstruck and excited to meet Amber she bought muffins. However, the psychologist comes back and says no. We always buy muffins and there’s protocol in place for celebrity clients… so her husband could assume a celebrity guest was coming due to the actions that were taken that day.

[@mckrackin5324]

Can we send a muffin basket to this lawyer as condolences for her being fired?

[@turbobrent9435]

Only if they had Johnny Depps face on them.

[@sweetandsavoury]

THIS WOMAN SHOULDNT BE PRACTISING LAW......USING MUFFINS AS A LEGAL DEFENSE UMMMM IM DEAD 🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️

[@mosquitoinmagicjohnsonshouse]

She owned her with that answer about her scope of responsibility as a psychologist

[@jacobbaker4545]

sure did....lol. i was like damn......

[@chrishple]

I'm really impressed how well-spoken and collected she was. She was not gonna be intimidated by Heard's lawyer and cracked such concisely worded answers to defend her credibility.

[@Holden1296]

The word "owned" is a bit strong don't you think? She was just okay if one is going to be somewhat objective.

[@CartoonHangout]

@@Holden1296 Whether you think she did okay or 'owned her' is subjective no matter what, technically.

[@Holden1296]

@@CartoonHangout What I meant---and I am sure you understood---that the average Jane/Joe would have considered what she said "okay". I don't want to get into a philosophical argument, so of course, you are technically correct. Wow, this is a waste of time lol. I think this entire trial---both sides---is full of psychobabble and nonsense. I was only on here because of the Stern comment.

[@ronnies3798]

Such a calculated, well-spoken, intelligent woman. What a great choice to have her be the one to do this.

[@deadaccountsadly4137]

Beautiful and intelligent. Lucky husband

[@James-kv3ll]

We’re talking about the Psychologist right? If so then yes, lady is fine in every way

[@themetaphysicalrev99]

I agree, she had that lawyer at a loss in so many ways.

[@TheKavebear1]

She is professional and ethical. Easy to see.

[@guysumpthin2974]

The obvious goal of the defense: use up ALL of the retainer money and pretend “we were fighting for you honey”

[@garnwalkerstables]

Worse attorney ever🤣

[@Broadwayballoons95]

What does muffins have to do with this!!!!!! I give so much respect for Dr. Curry, I saw Dr. Curry walking out of the court house we all clapped for her...

[@murtazarizvi368]

it would have made sense that if only JD n his team would have the dinner and amber just came n talk. that way it would look like that JD would be bribing. but adding muffins to the case doesnt make any statements

[@Broadwayballoons95]

@@murtazarizvi368 Exactly muffins had nothing to do with this…

[@WhereTheRainbowEnds1111]

Her lawyers are SO unprofessional. She was really arguing with the judge over an objection? So glad they're doing so poorly, Amber deserves a team like this

[@jerryrn5571]

But muffin’s 🤣😂. How much are these lawyers getting paid? 🤔🤦🏻‍♂️

[@manwell235]

I am laughing at how she sighed and needed a few seconds just to say she disagree with the judge.

[@WhereTheRainbowEnds1111]

@@manwell235 the sigh was what did it for me, too haha. I was like "Is this lady NUTS?" HAHA

[@Victory1007]

The muffins have spoken.

[@TheHellreaper25]

@Jerry RN we can assume it is without a doubt a large amount of muffins 🧐

[@jack36afc18]

If this trial has taught me one thing it’s that you really don’t need to be that intelligent to be a very successful lawyer

[@jacksimone1677]

If this trial has taught me anything it's that there's always a price to pay for handing out free muffins.

[@jack36afc18]

@@jacksimone1677 😂😂

[@greyngreyer5]

The lawyer isn't stupid.

[@jacksimone1677]

@@greyngreyer5 Heard's attorney? She comes across as pretty stupid.

[@Opticillusion160]

yes you really do… what you don’t understand that in this case to be an attorney for amber heard is going to require a lot to try to persuade the jury and public opinion. They’re doing their job

[@florilestari44]

Dr. Curry: "Can we stop talking about muffins?" Elaine: "Nope"

[@Lilo-A]

This was the stupidest line of questioning.

[@josegabrielsanchez8683]

Psychologist is super clear and articulate, she handled herself with a level of poise and elegance hardly found these days. Well done!

[@Bourinos02]

In other words, she's an actual professional :D

[@Coxon9]

She is also a complete smoke show.

[@FrancisCastiglione]

@@Coxon9 ????

[@jackbannock3458]

@@FrancisCastiglione it means she’s smoking hot lol

[@akaLuptonPittman]

@@Coxon9 Sadly, that was my immediate assessment. But then her smarts joined along, substantially increasing her “Hot AF Score” to a level bit too high for immediate feedback from the judges apparently. They are still intently discussing this situation in private, and should be announcing any time now, a clear and thorough explanation for us.

[@johnpossible6292]

This lawyer isn’t looking for truthful answers she’s just trying these trick questions to get her to purger herself.... it’s shameful.

[@ddtwo]

I am not on Ambers side or anything, but this is what most lawyers do. Confuse people and catch them offguard or break their defense. Thats also what police officer do in interviews. Very common technique to spot liars.

[@kellynolen498]

@@ddtwo yeah it is a common tactic but you have to be subtle about it if everyone knows what your doing there guards up and most importantly the jury doesn't like/trust you unless the opposition is just as bad it easily breaks the case although if if you fluster them right and they rush to explain they can lie on instinct or choose a poor lie or the lawyer can just use it so the witness brings up something you can branch off from instead of you jumping to bring something seemingly unrelated up

[@JordanDragonAs]

@@kellynolen498 yet this hasn't worked all trial.

[@MrBonners]

Trick questions? Worst magician I have ever seen.

[@genericchannelname3748]

That’s literally what lawyers do

[@NaBu972]

I love how it goes from muffins to Domestic abuse

[@kylebouyers51]

Dr. Curry: 'when we have celebrity clients, which happens quite often' AH lawyer: 'look on page 305-306, did you say you frequently have celebrity clients' ..... 😶😶🤔 Judge: 🙄🤷

[@oliviabennion5712]

The psychologist seem very intelligent. She knows what she's doing and talking about. She seems all facts and I love it!

[@NobodyCaresLI]

Kinda hard to have a doctorate if you're dumb

[@Matthew-mf6xg]

She knows what she's doing, very impressive.

[@Dinosaurs_with_laser_guns]

I hope his advocates brings up that a guitarist never would hurt their own fingers. I saw someone else write this and realised how brilliant it is. Hope this point can reach them if they haven’t already.

[@Matthew-mf6xg]

@@Dinosaurs_with_laser_guns he said its the only thing that brought him peace since he was 12! Someone hardcore into guitar doesn't go lopping their fingers off! And we know what a musician Depp is.

[@cheyhey2170]

@P J doesnt matter too much in the sense that it it varies a ton even when only taking people that seem similar in terms of intelligence based on conversations like this.

[@princessrainbow3756]

I adore this psychologist. She is so bright and present and attentive and really annunciates.

[@jakeballou5147]

Also confident. She had the polor opposite facial expression as amber did.

[@hallway_revenant7919]

same but all i could focus on was the pansexual hoodie

[@edgardocasenas4084]

She's intelligent, beautiful and eats muffins

[@hallway_revenant7919]

@@edgardocasenas4084 that is literally all I want in a woman

[@jiszle697]

Lol yeah she's really cool

[@Oxford322]

She’s trying so hard to make the Dr look sneaky , but only succeeds in making herself look ignorant .

[@Alonsos305]

Attorny: "What flavor were the muffins?" Psychologist: "Wat?" Attorny: "ANSWER THE DAMN QUESTION!"

[@errortryagainlater4240]

The fact this intelligent, professional woman has to respond to questions BLATANTLY trying to paint her as a potential mistress (meeting up with Depp for "dinner and drinks") is so frustrating. I can only imagine how annoyed she felt being there in person.

[@Tanaka1168]

YES! Ugh and the muffin thing where they asked her "why her husband brought muffins for amber heard" like ffs drop the tactics already

[@LazGato]

also the fact that she is married as well. its a insult to her and her husband

[@user-bn5fx4so2z]

As if the lawyer wouldn't have dinner with anyone but only with her dear husband.

[@pat_o7421]

They ruined that angle then by bringing up her caring husband who buys muffins for her, truly they're clueless.

[@kaijupark]

Does she have any social media? She is cool I wanna follow her

[@daniviris09]

The hard pivot form “you asked him to pick up the muffins” to “would you agree domestic violence can be verbal” is mental. What exactly goes on in that attorney’s head 🤣

[@PaulaLPope]

Best to jump off of that sinking ship and try another one. That would be my guess. This whole trial is nuts.

[@peppertheclumsyterrapin]

What exactly goes on in that attorney’s head? Uhm.... muffins?

[@takieddinbalti6956]

She is trying to get her to slip and say something wrong

[@zahraansari3710]

She realised the muffins strategy was leading nowhere so she switched

[@cye2310]

This is the sequel to Inside Out, but the memories are full of 2 things, law and pastry.

[@rosshulse9559]

I love this witness. How to put a "highly qualified lawyer" in their place. Don't play mind games with a psychologist lady.

[@geekstronomy3368]

i love the nearly 2 minutes of talking and thinking just for her to walk back and ask the same question she asked 3 times prior and got the same answer

[@danielpedigo72]

Edit: The biggest thing in court is paying attention to how the questions/statements are formed. This psychologist did not let anything slip. She made sure to confirm the wording before answering and to word her statements in ways that could not be twisted. Given her intelligence and qualifications, it does not surprise me that this Lawyer could not play her.

[@meow-meow-beans]

unrelated but the psychiatrist is gorgeous and smart to boot, quite to opposite of amber turds lawyer

[@invincible9462]

While her field of work is definitely half of the reason she doesn’t get tripped up, the other would be her being an expert witness who does this for a living, and has come across the obvious traps, that people like AH’s attorney sloppily set up many times before.

[@labauer5314]

@@invincible9462 yes! This is WORTH whatever $ she's paid. She knows what's coming before it's said. That's amazing.

[@DeathnoteBB]

She’s a psychologist. It’s literally in the video title

[@danielpedigo72]

@@DeathnoteBB I think we all know that lol. Not sure what the point of your comment was. I did say psychiatrist so technically I'm wrong, but yea, I'm aware of her profession, credentials, years of practice, ect. I simply said she is very thorough, attentive, & pays attention to the small details like sentence formation.

[@saphire9823]

This lawyer can’t stop interrupting people. Grasping desperately at straws trying to plant seeds into the jurors heads

[@Vib.H]

it would also look bad if she did not try? ------- --And yet ??? It could actually also be a, not entirely poor defense, maybe ?? If the lawyer, did NOT do her job, or did it really poorly ... Hmm?

[@alexbogiatzis9855]

That's her job

[@afellowhuman8944]

@@alexbogiatzis9855 and she's failling at it

[@ireneayala9115]

Shes's grasping for muffins okay lol

[@dawnramos7729]

I was going to say the same thing

[@cornelialibritanniaprincess]

The psychologist looking annoyed like she doesn’t want to be there is easily the cherry on top here 😂

[@TheShadowVorlon]

I almost felt sorry for the lawyer. Almost. She was so far out of her league, it was sad. The "Muffingate" was so absolutely pathetic, it was absurd.

[@tannymooo]

Muffingate🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@akeemawojobi6324]

She’s going on about muffins while the male lawyer went on about how Jonny was holding his wee 💦 😂😂

[@SolLunaTV]

The lawyer tried to discredit the psychologist, it is a cheap trick for when you have no ammunition in your case. So glad the psychologist didn't fall for any of those trick questions.

[@ericmann1781]

Yeah I noticed that's what they do to any and all "witnesses" who have any positive comments or answers in favor of Depp, immediate character assassination to discredit everyone and everything. Her defense is as much of a joke as she herself is.

[@verisheri1979]

I even see you here haha. Hi girls

[@edenyas946]

well she IS a psychologist.

[@Urmom-cw3fu]

Can you explain the trick

[@cage0613]

@@Urmom-cw3fu Nah, the lawyer's just rephrasing the questions again and again, enough to confuse and mess with someone's head, that may affect their answers. It's like intimidation or something.

[@aslihanakin1999]

I watched this part live and I actually was embarrassed for the defense, yikes

[@johnd3124]

turds lawyer: I object, hearsay! judge: it was your own question 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@liliths_gf3075]

Yeah they’re embarrassing. I’d be surprised if they’re hired for anything high profile after this

[@offtheice]

@@liliths_gf3075 anything else even

[@PBMS123]

They're certainly not doing any favours for their own reputation.

[@myy1008]

1000th like

[@givonnemondaine1223]

If I were a lawyer, I wouldn’t try to fool a psychologist with?????

[@CreativoErratico]

Turd's lawyers are this close to start using "I know you're stupid but what am I?" as a defense.

[@URADUSCHE]

Why were the muffins not brought into the court and presented as evidence? What kind of muffins were they? What ingredients were used in the preparation of said muffins? Which bakery were they from? Why were the jurors not given muffins to eat so they could better understand the feelings and thoughts of the people surrounding the muffins. I can't believe they went with the "Muffin Strategy" without muffins present in the courtroom. All these points and more are vital to fully understanding the muffin scenario. I DEMAND MUFFINS NOW!!!

[@PinkyakaAyannaj]

I agree totally 🙃 wouldn't it be so awesome if Johnny's team actually brought in muffins so that when Amber Heard gets on the stand they can show her the muffins and as her if those were in fact the muffins that were bought for her🤣😅🤣😅

[@mayannbaragona6392]

Hahaha! This statement just took away all the stress I had today. 😂😂😂

[@ildimed]

🤣🤣🤣

[@JoJo-op5xy]

😂 😂 😂

[@catatonic8313]

the muffins are paid actors

[@DracoRach]

Psychologist: Can we stop talking about muffins? Lawyer: *M U F F I N S*

[@MyPhone-bf8hy]

I just totally got her 😂 When you just ask your husband to get you something... In this case MUFFINS 😂😂😂 You just want him to get it for you, happy wife, happy life 😁

[@clairewilliams3081]

The whole muffin conversation was both hilarious and ridiculous in equal measure 🤣

[@chettonex]

@@clairewilliams3081 and such a waste of everybodys time. Lawyers should be fined if they repeat over and over irrelevant questions for the sake of extenting the trial.

[@mgraves3906]

This had me rofl, I am in tears!!😂😂😂

[@accountsofsolon7598]

🤣🤣🤣

[@freebooterluckless]

Reason #2604 why Amber Heard should be kicked out of any projects she is currently working on. Quite literally tried to come after an abuse victim’s psychologist with a bs reason concerning muffins

[@sambrainard3487]

Psychologist: That is not accurate. Lawyer: What _is_ accurate? Psychologist: wtf

[@1ACL]

This lawyer is so unlikable, so convolouted, so confusing, so obtuse and has such an abrasive personality the jury would rule against her no matter what!

[@dirksofficial9939]

Agreed! Seems like her questions being convoluted and confusing is completely intentional though.

[@PinkyakaAyannaj]

I agree. She's extremely unlikable.

[@eFrog27]

There were points where she wasn’t getting anywhere and was audibly and visibly annoyed. Sighing loudly and being needlessly argumentative after the judge had passed a ruling on an objection.

[@mikeg3439]

It is weird how such a charismatically deficient lawyer could have risen far enough to gain employment on a high profile legal case. I realize cases should not hinge on that sort of thing, but with jury cases, they really very often do.

[@TheWalf999]

@@veep5712 Sounds like Johnny's team.

[@jazzcabbage9071]

I like that she kept reiterating that it was not her responsibility nor within the scope of her job to prove that domestic violence took place rather she clearly and accurately restated multiple times that her job was to evaluate her client's mental state. She's great!

[@christinel5347]

I can’t believe this lawyer said to the judge she was bias. She’s so argumentative

[@raycasas2867]

The lawyer is trying to completely discredit the psychologist, and fails so miserably she literally did major damage to the case she’s trying to make. Someone get this lawyer a snickers or better yet a muffin 😂

[@kika93able]

I love this woman! So much patience during this awkward exchange. She's such a professional!

[@stingerjohnny9951]

She’s a psychologist, so I doubt this is the weirdest conversation she’s ever had 🤣

[@inoob26]

it's kinda her job

[@the_deal0525]

@@stingerjohnny9951 true

[@tanyaelias7683]

I think we should stop saying that she has bad lawyers; that gives Amber some sort of justification when she inevitably loses. I think we all need to realize that Amber has no case and these poor lawyers are have to grasp at every straw.

[@sarcasm-83]

Very true and well said. They're faced with a hopeless task and it absolutely shows.

[@turlupouet]

You're so right

[@gersomvanslooten9456]

This is of the utmost importance. It's clear that Amber is already being judged by the court of public opinion. But the lawyers are just doing their jobs. Granted, some of these leading questions and the omission of details don't paint Amber's lawyers in a favorable light.

[@RoseBud-kk8vm]

It would help to hear from Disney. Can they not be forced to testify i wonder?

[@xelumbra]

I still would hardly call them "poor lawyers" because they're still being pretty damn rude, patronising and condescending. Then again that's the game I suppose.

[@thatguy-js7ri]

Amber heard: *tries to abuse kindness of psyochologist against them* Psychologist: *exposes Amber Heard abusing kindness during an abuse case* Amber Heard: *surprised pikachu face*

[@Stillreal312]

So Dr. Curry said something in the like of "My husband bought these muffins" and Amber took it as "My husband heard that you were coming, so he ran out and got muffins for you"

[@101RadioheadCovers]

The muffins thing was meant to discredit the witness (accusing her of breaking patient confidentiality by telling her husband Amber Heard was coming in). Completely backfired, just showed how narcissistic Ms. Heard is, that when she heard that the husband had bought the muffins, she assumed the muffins were for her specifically and he must be trying to impress her.

[@fayemarch4820]

Literally! And it correlates with Dr.Curry's diagnosis of HPD

[@rickrolled3666]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/p4CmdGaId9-BqK8 Finally its here.

[@Baychimo]

They were doing what you just said. They were desperate to fish for possible confidentiality breach. "when she heard that the husband had bought the muffins, she assumed the muffins were for her specifically and he must be trying to impress her" is just pure fiction, unless someone testified that she actually said that. Even that wouldn't necessarily be narcissistic, as many times people do tend to make an extra effort to please rich/famous people.

[@101RadioheadCovers]

@@Baychimo I am speculating, not creating fiction. Luckily, youtube comments are not a court of law, just a court of public opinion, and I'm allowed to speculate here. Obviously Ms Heard was the one that brought up the muffins to her lawyers, and held the belief that the husband knew she was there based on this.

[@sadia2395]

So true!

[@bearoqueiro8905]

this trial has taught me that I could never be this patient. I'd be flipping out after the 3rd stupid question and this psychologist and johnny deserve a friggin medal for putting up with this

[@succubusrat6886]

Bro you need to see Johnny's accountant video. Sharp memory, calm and clear to the point. Not to mention numbers don't lie

[@nezukoban1068]

I feel the same

[@THERANDOMMAN91]

@@succubusrat6886 numbers can lie if manipulated by the right person, but this wasn’t was the case

[@Anonymous-vb7fw]

That’s exactly what AH’s lawyers are looking/aiming for so you’d be playing right into their hands lol

[@SpookiCooki]

I think Johnny also deserves a muffin.

[@riplix20]

4:45 “ I’m asking you a question I’d like you to try and answer the question “ Imagine talking down like that to someone way smarter than you are lmao

[@footrot17]

Gas station sushi lawyer angry about Muffins and dinner with drinks.

[@rampage222555]

This is one of those moments where I realize why people hate lawyers. This lawyer was trying desperately to guide the psychologist into perjury. That was her whole intent and when it failed, she didn't know what to do.

[@Cowtymsmiesznego]

Well, if the witness *was* lying, that's how we would find out. It's quintessential to the process that lawyers do this.

[@blakan1478]

@@Cowtymsmiesznego But if the witness is telling the truth it is also "quintessential" to the process that the lawyers don´t skewer the truth that the witness has to offer

[@alyssa7974]

That's just what lawyers do, let's say if the witness was actually lying(not like this psychologist) It's absolutely essential that lawyers try to trap them into a pool of their own lies to win the case and prove the witness is lying. Though it comes off as immoral to do this, you've got to admit, if it was Depp's lawyer doing this to Heard's team, we would instead praise the lawyer calling said lawyer "smart"

[@Cowtymsmiesznego]

@@blakan1478 The lawyers don't decide on the truth of the matter - the judge/jury does. Also, that's why both sides have their lawyers, each trying to "skew" to their client's side.

[@namyajha482]

@@Cowtymsmiesznego exactly

[@missnerd4832]

Her little smile while answering is so funny to watch. As psychologists, we are trained to predict behaviour. She knows what's coming from the lawyer and she's 10 steps ahead of Heards lawyer😂😂

[@ucdlbatrd1121]

That's what I was thinking ......hoe does she think she can confuse a psychologist

[@axpublisherdigital]

So she’s on her client’s side and there to make sure she proves that Amber has a disorder ?

[@jdbsoccer100]

@@axpublisherdigital what a random question. How did you come up with that from the comment Miss Nerd left?

[@martinabencova7070]

@@axpublisherdigital You sound like one of AH 's lawyers

[@GameInDorf]

@@axpublisherdigital respectfully, Ms. Bredehoft, aren't you supposed to stay away from clips of the trial while it's still ongoing?

[@dhaiyaanwirdhan653]

this lawyer is trying to outsmart a psychologist

[@wuphat]

Elaine is like "You never hit a home run in the World Series, did you?" Curry, "That's not within my profession" Elaine: "So you didn't hit a home run?" Idiot

[@Ongargis]

If you know the muffin man or his location, please contact Amber Heard's legal team. His testimony is pivotal in this case.

[@GLEESY84]

He’s on druery lane 😂

[@wolfrainexxx]

If only they had a Muffin Button. kzbin.info/www/bejne/nIjHfKd3jMmGjsk

[@ch-p2861]

Drury Lane

[@jameseyk1]

The muffin man?

[@junarmue5497]

🤣🤣🤣

[@chrislor2882]

When your biggest defense is trying to trick witnesses into puns, it's because you have nothing and you're going to lose.

[@laurids2007]

the muffins story will be forever remembered. I wonder which bakery made them. They should close an ad with this Doctor because she now deserves all cams on her. Very professional, polite and concise. My math teacher in school would lose for her. Applause! 👏👏👏 AH's team deserves an ananas. What a bunch of idiots! where did they buy their diploms?

[@oz4549]

no she will win

[@xime409]

@@oz4549 nah

[@gamesforever4841]

@@oz4549 naaah

[@rkymtnchi503]

@@oz4549 she'll win alright...she'll win a room at the local mental institution

[@TheXander360]

I would die laughing if she said that her husband probably wouldn't even know who Amber Herd is

[@actuallyAtlas1989]

Psychologist: *answering the question* "Lawyer": I asked you a question, I'd like you to answer the question.

[@Joy-bi5fi]

The woman shared her breakfast with amber, apparently you can not do anything nice for amber without being punished for it.

[@wallykimball8829]

It almost seems like they're trying to make some creepy implication about the husband who bought the muffins.

[@RotaAbyssian]

@@wallykimball8829 I think they're trying to show she broke confidentiality, and it becomes increasingly obvious that is not the case despite how desperate and juvenile the defense tries to be. You do not need to know WHO a person is to buy muffins for them to be shared between them and your wife. You do not need to know who someone is to know that they are important. You can enjoy a meal during an interview without it being a bribe.

[@wallykimball8829]

@@RotaAbyssian I agree. These lawyers try to make any innocent act or gesture appear to be shady and manipulative. 90% of what they say is pure scum lawyer-ese. I liked the irony of Amber's lawyer implying motives inspired by a "high profile" case. Because Amber's lawyer is motivated by pure altruism.🤩

[@nickdesimone1160]

she’ll use anything against anyone

[@HappyVLR]

Fr

[@dnaseb9214]

What a DISGUSTING lawyer. Trying to twist words and trick people into saying something they didnt mean because they got confused. This is why people despise lawyers.

[@williamsmith8522]

Yes, this lawyer seems like she’d fit in well at Capitol Hill

[@Snoop_Dugg]

Until you need to hire one. lol

[@rideordis810]

Amber Heard found lawyers as slimy and dishonest as she is. Gross client. Gross lawyers.

[@trulor]

Had dinner and drinks with Depp…like having drinks isn’t a typical thing? With dinner? I hate how they try to paint it as a negative thing. The sigh of defeat after getting stubbed by her answers is so satisfying.

[@SergeantFknLag]

Lawyers typically tend to do this to discredit a witness. They’ll ask the same question multiple times in different ways to try and catch someone slipping up to try and sway the jury in favor of their client

[@mariamatmos4506]

- Objection - I don’t agree Wtaf?????🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@pandaDotDragon]

9:30 I can read her mind at that moment 😂

[@lydiax2178]

The way that this lawyer was trying to use shady, unprincipled manipulation tactics on a trained physiologist and thought it would work is truly laughable

[@Madchemist002]

Psychologist*

[@lydiax2178]

@@Madchemist002 thanks for correcting me. Dyslexia gets in the way sometimes 😂

[@justinkerns6015]

@@lydiax2178 thats not dyslexia. you just typed it in wrong.

[@justinkerns6015]

@@lydiax2178 "it's my DYSLEXIA guys!! I know nobody asked but i have DYSLEXIA."

[@darthnox8286]

@Justin Kerns "It's my OPINIONS guys!! I know nobody asked, but I have OPINIONS." Here's your crown of douchebaggery my guy, wear it with pride as you look around and see everyone against you.

[@stacyfaris281]

I have so much respect for this woman! Professional, intelligent, non-biased and unwavered by the defense’s allegations and super inappropriate treatment of her as a witness and as a professional psychologist. This lawyer is gradually starting to treat witnesses worse the more frustrated she gets. She exhibits emotions of fear and anger in her voice and behavior towards all the witnesses the further this case goes along. I’m still shocked at how far the judge lets the defense go with repetitious drilling. I have yet to see where they have accomplished anything besides wasting the courts time and only proving that they are unprofessional and in over their heads.

[@KahL646]

might be in Johnnys interest to let them, if they come off as desperate / aggressive it helps his case.

[@acommentator4452]

she is fearing having to face her client if they do not win... i almost feel sorry for her.

[@wesker74]

@@acommentator4452 I don’t. It’s Amber’s fault that they even have to fight this hard. Amber lied to her lawyers and they’re just now starting to realize it. If I were her lawyers, I would drop her. If they stay through this whole trial, it’s only damaging their reputations and I’m pretty sure it’s fair to say, they don’t have much left lmao.

[@CoolGuy-kq2vz]

It’s gone on this long so let for the memes we are getting out the case

[@TheBluemindedGod]

And a stone cold fox.

[@jjw238]

The lawyer should have probed further about the street her husband resides on, maybe they live on Drury Lane.