Shop Talk EP 4 - Zeiss CP3 Lenses

[@bryanbarajasBB]

Finally a movie review style of The Lenses! 😉👍

[@patlecat]

Why is the music so loud man? Is this a music video? ;-)

[@PakshiMedia]

Wow Very Nice!!!

[@ZEISSCinematography]

Thank you so much for your great review, we're glad that you like our CP.3s! We would love to share your review on our social media channels, would it be okay for you if we took a screengrab for this purpose? Best, your ZEISS Cinematography team

[@vaxs3993]

Hello ! tell me please which lense is better? what you will recomend for film? c.p.3 or arriflex zeiss MK2 Planar 32 мм T2 ?

[@crowncat6264]

sieg meow

[@aLittlePal]

That classic zeiss look. Superb.

[@PakshiMedia]

Subscribed!!!

[@shoptalkstudio]

Nice.

[@souliyongsayavong4481]

Nice vdo ! What do you think about canon cine và zeiss cp3 ? Which one is better?

[@BenRaddatz]

would have been nice to see what the lenses actually look like, rather than keeping them behind a filter for the whole 5 minute example

[@nick_g]

if i can only afford one of these lenses, then which camera angle would you recommend?

[@walmartpimp2]

I have the 50mm CP.3 in imperial units with the Sony E mount, and for the time being it’s the only lens I have for my Sony Alpha 7S III. I do a lot of indoor close range stuff and in order to get everything in focus I need to close down the iris to at least T5.6. By closing down the iris I either gotta increase the intensity of my lights or increase the ISO. Sometimes I wish I got the 35mm because it’s easier to keep things in focus with that lens. So for you I’d either go with 35mm or 50mm.

[@nick_g]

@@walmartpimp2 thanks! Your experience lines up with a lot of what I’ve heard. I had a 20mm on an APSC a while back and I liked the angle which would’ve been equal to 30mm on a full frame sensor. Many people recommend getting to the edge of distortion which is somewhere in that 30-40mm range on FF I think.

[@walmartpimp2]

@@nick_g So 28mm or 35mm would be ideal for you.

[@bidpay]

hardly anything left but fanboyism, why? that´s disappointing😞

[@travellifesol6084]

I thought it was a pretty detailed video thanks heaps for putting your time into this. I am new to all this and keen to learn more so hey Bidpay, Can you explain what you mean. I am looking for objective opinion (that would be your opinion) and not fan boy opinion. Many thanks to both of you

[@沈重光-l1p]

@@travellifesol6084 Because they're not better than the still zeiss lenses in terms of image quality or speed. I would either rent ultra primes or stick with my own still lenses if there's not enough budget. not taking away that it is a well made video and I do appreciate that

[@DaCarnival]

@@沈重光-l1p Have you ever shot with still lenses on a real production with a focus puller? They will fucking hate it. I did, it semi-worked out, but it was such a hassle. Cine lenses have very real benefits.

[@johannm7794]

@@沈重光-l1p Absolute Clown comment, still lenses cannot be used in a professional set Environment, even If their Image was perfect. Their Focus through is mostly off and way to short for an AC, Focus breathing etc.