Dash Cam Saves Citizen From HIGHLY ILLEGAL Stop

[@AuditTheAudit]

The first 100 people to use code AUDIT at the link below will get 60% OFF of Incogni: incogni.com/audit

[@Gaian-Commander]

17h ago. Smh. I don't see how it's fair since people can have a unfair advantage if you hid it from public release.

[@mjd111]

​​@@Gaian-Commanderit's available til Friday, click on the link.

[@mjd111]

​@@Gaian-Commanderit's available til Friday, click the link and you'll see.

[@edgeGabe]

Are you guity of operating a rigged lottery?

[@johnzoidberg1160]

15:20 You keep bootlicking AtA.... Horrible take on the first stop. Do better.

[@TCR2025]

Another channel covered this. They pulled him over because he was complaining about the Deland PD and filed a complaint against him so this was in retaliation.

[@raulreyes6573]

Link?

[@DrQuan215]

@@raulreyes6573 pretty sure it was on Lackluster's channel

[@BurninatorTheTrogdor]

I knew this was DeLand. WOW

[@johnzoidberg1160]

​@@raulreyes6573check out This is a Public Service's channel. This happened recently and he had some good shorter videos covering it.

[@AngieLustic]

⁠​⁠@@raulreyes6573 I think “this is a public service” channel is linked in the description - there is another video with him and James Madison audits going to the police station conducting “free well being checks” after this stop 😂- he was also live with Honor your oath in Daytona beach shores earlier this week after DBSPD arrested Jeff gray (honor your oath) then unarrested 😂 him for solicitation -

[@Maziwrath]

How can our completely idiotic courts decide in cases such as Warren v. District of Columbia that the police have no obligation to protect the public, and then 5 minutes later decide when the police are bored and randomly want to "protect" the public that it's completely acceptable to violate your 4th amendment rights? We need to end lifetime appointments.

[@Nikkithedog-t6b]

Because they are protected by Republicans, it's about to get far worse.

[@foadrightnow5725]

Good point! Any argument the police try to assert to justify their actions concerning "protecting the public" should be dismissed!

[@ajm5007]

Effectively, the cops have no DUTY to protect you, but if they CHOOSE to "protect" you, you have to let them.

[@BakeXlove11]

​@@ajm5007 And that's absolutely unacceptable.

[@valentinius62]

It's all about maximizing government's power and minimizing its liability.

[@olCactus]

I need to get off my butt and install my dash cam.

[@VespasianJudea]

You’d hate yourself if you needed it and didn’t have it. Get on it dude. Today.

[@MichaelMcFerrin]

Good idea

[@jonosay854]

Same!!

[@Rustasious]

My wife keeps telling me the same thing. I'm thinking today is the day I've got no plans today.

[@subprimebradandsteve]

Life saver. Someone crashed into me and tried to commit fraud. I wasn't believed until I pulled out my video. I was about to lose a lot!

[@ianbattles7290]

"I appreciate the concern, but I do not need or want your help. Am I free to go or am I under arrest?"

[@davidpearman4792]

Exactly. Mr. Good made this way worse than it needed to be. I think he's the fool of this scene

[@plackt]

Yeah, could’ve been over in under a minute, but he had to blow it out of proportion. Classic case of biting his nose to spite his face!

[@lodrbyroni]

@@davidpearman4792 He had just filed a complaint at the department with that same officer that came up second... They followed him and did this just to F with him... He was pissed is why he acted that way.

[@timmyneutron4701]

And the officers said yes he was free to leave. He decided to stick around.

[@sodoodle296]

​@@davidpearman4792 agreed.

[@ajnathan9490]

If you dont know this story (in full), either his channel or Lackluster have the full story. It was absolutely a retaliatory 'harassment' stop!

[@AngieLustic]

This is a public service and James Madison audits went to the police station after this stop to conduct “free well being checks” - they flipped it on them..😂 I am still not sure the cops even understood…🙄 but the message was very clear!

[@ChristiaanC458]

What a Surprise 😮

[@MrBeevee5]

Of course it was. Never heard of such a stop.

[@Grizazzle]

Seems like he's a provocateur. Doesn't make the cops right but doesn't make the man an honest actor either.

[@MrBeevee5]

@@Grizazzle Are you referring to other incidents, or did this one make him the dishonest one? The whole discussion was about THIS ONE.

[@beepbop6697]

16:57 "I'm going to arrest your mother". LOL, wut?!?

[@davidsimmons7359]

While I agree that making this statement is not wise, I am aware that some jurisdictions make parents criminally liable for the actions of minors in certain circumstances. However I see no point in stating that to the minor other than a failed intimidation tactic.

[@fitshamer]

19:10 OMG the 2nd dude is hilarious. "I just got in this bush! I've never been in this bush before!" Comedy GOLD.

[@holycrapchris]

Glad someone else caught that 😀

[@darkedgex]

I always say that when I'm caught in a new bush. Don't want the old bush getting jealous.

[@Del_S]

"There are no Hulkamaniacs in this bush!"

[@joshp8535]

Lmao, I even read your comment before hearing it and it was still funny as hell. Hilarious.

[@AJDavis-ti2ee]

Before the bush he was at the lie-berry, so..

[@ianbattles7290]

How sad that we need cameras to protect ourselves from the very people we pay to protect us...

[@kirtose]

we pay them to enforce laws. they have no obligation to our safety.

[@patrickday4206]

Same reason why we need transcripts in court even then judges have gotten caught conspiring to have their clerks stop recording if they say key words

[@patrickday4206]

Power corrupts

[@PepeToTheMooon]

This is totally bogus. A “well-being” check?? Really??

[@frocat5163]

The driver needed someone to check on his well-being after the swine illegally detained him...

[@bill2066]

if one is driving like they got their Drivers license at COSTCO? YES!

[@mobrocket]

​@@bill2066 Did you not pay attention to the video?

[@Tb0n3]

​@@bill2066if he was driving in an unsafe or illegal manner, the police would have said they pulled him over for driving in an illegal or unsafe manner. Instead they pulled him over because they wanted to pull him over. They're not allowed to do that.

[@bill2066]

@@mobrocket Wow, that was fast!!. Hey Professor, Did you not pay attention to the video?

[@fifthamendment1]

9:04 This was NOT a welfare check. It was a pretext stop.

[@Nikkithedog-t6b]

Wait until you see how much immunity trump gives his crooked blue army, you haven't seen anything yet. The amount of money that cops will steal from the public is about to skyrocket.

[@LordVetinari69]

but the lights went on AFTER he pulled into the parking spot? It's at 2:52

[@hectorabarron]

Pretext stops are legal anyways

[@awakenotwoke1973]

Retaliation for attempting to file complaints.

[@bazooka712]

​@@hectorabarron when there is no shown necessity? No.

[@gtdgabriste1]

In Mr. The Good's defense, the traffic stop was over, and had been for several minutes, when he got out. He had been told several times that he was not detained.

[@jamesmancuso3666]

Exactly! The stop was over.

[@Eckx1084]

Also agree. I can get the logic "Well the cops could react badly" but isn't that exactly what this channel is about? This is almost victim blaming. "Well you got out of the car, so they reacted. You did this to yourself".

[@Orrinn123]

That’s in the police’s defense. Not Mr. The Good

[@Eckx1084]

@@Orrinn123 How is it defense of the police when they are talking about the action of Mr. The Good and his grade being reduced even though he was "free to go"?

[@Orrinn123]

@ Oh I misunderstood. I thought he was explaining that he was not detained and therefore free to go. Which is what the police were saying when he kept talking about being detained. I didn’t know this was about the grade

[@madcapmagician6018]

31:36 sorry ATA, any reasonable person would also assume that after making s threat to kill a kid that this individual may very well have been armed and a danger. You have to understand that making s death threat infront of cops is not a thing a mentally secure person does unless they think they are able to carry out that threat.

[@tronicol235]

The victim is mentally unwell because he was angry at the kid for breaking into his property? What?

[@teridoster5840]

⁠@@tronicol235just a small correction… the teens hadn’t broke into his property, it was a preemptive threat

[@metta116]

Its not that the fact that the other guy was breaking in to anything. But the one guy came out after police arrived, started talking shit thinking they were his body gaurds or a bro or some shit. Dude shouldnt have even approached the scene.

[@carolinusTG]

Ohhh, ok. So you're fine with your rights being taken away from you under false pretenses. All I heard was wellbeing check for driving. You sound like you might be on some kind of drug induced high. Why don't you forfeit all of your r

[@Rezan661]

What’s your favorite flavor of boot polish?

[@thesuperdingos]

The second video is pretty wild. That neighbor didn’t do himself any favors.

[@dmacrolens]

People that can't tell the difference between a one foot and a six foot drop, or a leg sweep from a body slam, are really something special.

[@Easymoneyspiker]

Classic case of fuck around and find out

[@Sadows12]

Idk walking up on a suspect saying you're gonna "smoke" them doesn't seem to smart along with pushing the cop. Is it worth getting injured over? No. But his actions unfortunately led up to that.

[@TheBrapbrapboy]

@@Sadows12I agree I don’t think they get a F cause you can’t come flying in talking about your going to smoke someone then resist lmfao

[@adrian-paulbrathwaite5338]

@@dmacrolens I mean he was standing upright and was slammed face first into concrete from an upright position. His body wasn't 5-6 feet in the air but his face definitely was.

[@THEKNOW11]

Don’t man up on kids in front of cops.

[@joshb8976]

The 2nd guy is an idiot

[@BanonOmus]

First guys an idiot

[@thomaslane2410]

I normally agree with the grades provided as I do with the first interaction. As for the 2nd interaction, the cops do not deserve an F. He hit a cop then resisted arrest.

[@t.j.jeffries1263]

Exactly!

[@michaelhaydenbell]

I agree in principle, but cops LOOOOVVVE to use going hands on as an excuse to then go absolutely crazy using as much force as possible and inflicting intentional injury in retaliation. There's a big difference in being forced to take someone to the ground to detain them vs SLAMMING them down out of anger because "they deserved it". People get paralyzed or even die from that shit, and all the other times they don't, these details get lost in the bullshit police report where they clean it all up with carefully crafted, deliberately misleading phrasing. Cops HAVE to have emotional control, and often times they're some of the absolute worst.

[@xjcrossx]

He didn't hit a cop, he was getting the cops hand off of his shirt. That doesn't deserve being tackled to the ground, when he wasn't being detained or arrested, and was not a threat to the police at all. All he did was smack a cop's hand off of his shirt.

[@thomaslane2410]

@ The guy was rightfully upset but when the cop told him to stop he should have stopped advancing towards the kid. He could have continued to make his point from wherever he was standing. Smack/hit are synonymous. If I smack someone, I would get arrested for assault, just like this guy did.

[@DiabolikalFollikles]

@@michaelhaydenbellHitting and swatting away someone’s hand differ. I’ve seen some cops give leniency when a victim illustrates passion. So what now? Do you believe the leo deserves a D-? Better?

[@jakespeed4072]

From his channel I believe …He was pulled over AFTER having just filed a police complaint with the same department

[@Doovoopvpxtreme]

You owe me a million bucks for harassing me. I said it so it's true.

[@firemedic2442]

​@@Doovoopvpxtreme 🤡🤡🤡🤡

[@Romanus-]

@@Doovoopvpxtreme🐷

[@PengusKhan]

this is correct, although i dont believe the complaint process went well iirc.

[@PengusKhan]

@@Doovoopvpxtreme ?

[@gloatsmitty4253]

Dude said that he was going to shoot somebody and then slapped a cop he seems pretty lucky to be alive at this point

[@t.j.jeffries1263]

Agreed! I usually agree with ATA, but in this case, I don't. The officer's actions were justified under the law.

[@muddyhotdog4103]

I dunno how his life was in jeopardy at any point,to say he's lucky to be alive is a little overboard. Not like he pulled a weapon out 🧐

[@toobsteak]

I disagree that lethal force would have been warranted, but the force shown was absolutely warranted.

[@TheXxemarosaxx]

I wonder if the cop knows that there’s an entire gig economy out there of DoorDash and food delivery drivers who stopped frequently. I wonder if he pulls all of them over😂

[@FrogsForBreakfast]

I also pull over to look at the GPS sometimes. It's not safe to examine it with the level of concentration I require when the car is in motion, and the voice directions don't always cut it. If you're clearly in control of the vehicle the whole time you pull over, then there's no reason to believe there's a problem!

[@galactic_ape1929]

More importantly, you are told to pull over to use your phone. Damn if you do, damn if you don't...

[@Fater4511]

it was retaliatory, the one cop had been following him for sometime, everytime he got behind him, he pulled off the road and stopped to let the officer go by.

[@TheXxemarosaxx]

@@FrogsForBreakfast illegal to pull over and get your bearings but also illegal to mess with the phone and drive so it’s a damned if you do or don’t lol

[@michaelmccandless1280]

Only when they're delivering donuts. They have a nose for those things.

[@Nameless-lk8ld]

So you can’t pull over. You can’t sit in your car in a parking lot. You can’t drive while black or brown. You can’t drive an expensive car. You can’t drive slower or faster than the speed limit and you must drive in a perfectly straight line without nearing any road lines. Got it! 👍🏻

[@wesleyandrews9198]

Threatening to kill a kid in front cops and everything that happened is on him.

[@frankwallace5174]

agreed

[@TyroneJackson-n6e]

When keeping it real goes wrong.

[@frankwallace5174]

@@TyroneJackson-n6e perfect way to say it

[@robschnack8377]

Ignore the law do you? Just like the police? Eye for an eye guy.

[@steveearlesweatshirt9253]

​@@robschnack8377are you referring to the guy who threatened vigilante killing for the suspected crime of theft?

[@eciesz]

Cutting through neighbors yards after dark with Something us kids did all the time in the 80s. It was like an intricate game of hide and seek, kick the can or cops and robbers. However, in the 80s everyone on the block knew each other and the kids came out of at least four of the houses on my street and there was almost zero crime in that neighborhood. We had it sooo good in the 80’s.

[@GoToPhx]

Same in the 60's and 70's. We didn't know everyone, but people didn't call the police every 5 minutes.

[@Blindman51]

As to the grade on the first one... It doesnt matter how the cop interpreted it, he was told he was free to go. With that he had every right to get out and express a grievance with his governent.

[@TheBalthazarrrr]

Yeah they definitely wouldn't have used him driving away from a traffic stop as an excuse to throw his ass in jail. All it takes is for them in their mind to decide you are detained and he can do as he pleases.

[@MrBeevee5]

I think the grade was because of the safety factor. Even ATA is recognizing that cops can be dangerous even in lawful situations. Not good to be "right" and put yourself into a situation where you can be killed.

[@robertkitts1761]

Even if he wasn't free to go before the Supervisor spoke to him, as soon as he walked away from the car the traffic stop was finished and he could get out of the car. As soon as the reason for the stop is resolved, the stop is over. The police don't get to hold you longer than that for no reason or a bogus reason like officer safety.

[@wilfredrivera6521]

What kinda idiot walks up to somebody while cops are there and wants to act tough and threaten

[@HOAsSUCK]

I agree, the man was in a rage and being excessively aggressive. No wonder the kid was hiding. The kids life was in danger.

[@Degarth]

Diedrich Parks, apparently.

[@Katstackz7414]

hes a pissed off human being was he wrong no.could the cop handled the siutation better yes.

[@wilfredrivera6521]

@@Katstackz7414 yes he was wrong, “use your words”he’s not five years old with no self control ,he’s a grown man . But I do agree that officers can handle it better, they’re supposed to be the trained professionals

[@Dennis-Hare]

That's so thoughtful of the Deland PD to ensure the wellbeing of the driver. Really makes me want to move there. I can only imagine how many times they have pulled this stunt to only fish for something further to arrest him.

[@perfectlyharmless]

Bad for real estate. Investors watch these videos and buy accordingly. Municipalities should rethink their commitment to these "public servants." Mayors, do you understand?

[@chronographer]

They are just harassing him because he has filed complaints on their gang brothers. They just want to waste his time and remind him they are watching.

[@SavageMatty]

Parks asked for that though the officers don't deserve an F for that at all. He literally threatened murder in front of officers, and maintained a belligerent attitude. Also, he was interrupting an investigation where a suspect had the chance to get away if he so chose

[@Emceepe]

15:32 according to both cops this wasn’t a traffic stop and he wasn’t being detained and he was free to go. He had every goddamn Right as an American citizen to get out of his car anytime he wanted to. To suggest the citizen did something wrong that may get him killed by an unhinged cop is absurd.

[@-Monad-]

You think it's "absurd" to say that an officer might shoot him for getting out? Are you serious?

[@RekySai]

What I think is absurd is that you're willing to risk the life of every civilian over the life of a gang member who is known for taking advantage of their power... I don't know it seems pretty absurd when they had no problem cause

[@drgirlfriend211]

Omg my first thought was that he was going to get shot by these looney toons playing as cops! You’re crazy!!

[@joshuakingbird1227]

@@-Monad-I don’t think he’s saying it’s absurd a trigger happy cop would 100% shoot him. It’s absurd that it is “normal” for cops to shoot unarmed citizens. The traffic stop was over and the incredibly immature cops walked away kid conversation. Not one but two, one being a supervisor. They made an illegal stop and then wouldn’t listen to the citizen cuz they couldn’t handle being questioned.

[@Kha0tic]

​@@-Monad- I agree that the citizen stepping out could get him shot. Heck a nervous twitch, or rebuking in the name of Jesus is enough for some officers... I don't think that's what Emceepe meant. "To suggest the citizen did something wrong..." is what's absurd, not that the officer may hurt the citizen... The comment Emceepe made is (edited), so it may have stated that at first? I don't know. While it may be foolish in a lot of cases to confront an officer like this, it's not wrong to think you have a right to do so.

[@KrakenIsland64]

"I just got in this bush, I've never been in this bush before!" Least innocent sentence ever 😂

[@brandonsshenanigans9482]

I think the driver in the first video should have gotten an A. The traffic stop was over once the Sargent made it clear that he wasn't willing to listen to the guy and walked away. At that point, he was free to go. He shouldn't have to limit his movements because cops are cowards.

[@kingkerry123]

I thought the same... maybe an A-

[@MrWebster]

According to the cop the driver was not detained and then free to move about. Grade A.

[@justaworkeryup636]

That is totally correct according to the police. It was never a traffic stop and it was over before the sergeant came. He would be free to stay in his car or leave

[@donjohnson1416]

So tell us youve always had a job behind a desk without saying it! Good job.

[@rogeryoungblood2452]

Nah, gets an F for being a dipshit lol

[@ohredbrd]

I would just like to say that I appreciate that your new videos shown are timely with relationship to when they actually happened and when you discuss them here.

[@OldManSurvival]

Mr. TheGood deserves an A. The traffic stop was over. The police officers had all walked away and gotten in their cars. He was legally allowed to get out of his car .

[@icin4d]

Agree. The driver wasn't even detained at any time during this stop.

[@ace24680]

Yeah he is basically saying he deducted points because even though he did nothing wrong some cops can and do use it as an excuse to escalate to another level

[@jormungand72]

remember, when the cops dont detain you, you are not free to leave. so long as a cop car is behind you, you must stay in your vehicle and not go about your business... fucking wild that this channel thinks its a negative that someone who was allegedly never detained, is not free to go about their business...

[@greybeard5123]

There are other videos out there showing people who need police assistance being arrested and thrown on the ground for trying to walk up to a police car. Many tyrants considered walking up to their vehicle to be aggressive, and they react very poorly. The fact the stop had ended doesn't reduce the danger of exiting the car and walking up to them. It is completely legal to walk up to them, and many (possibly even most) police are fine with it. But some aren't and it is dangerous.

[@faytleingod1851]

Getting out of the car and yelling "Sargent!" I don't think I could with conscious say he deserves an A .

[@mikelchristensen5276]

Second video...Mr. parks aggressively walked up to the minor suspect, belligerently threatened him, assaulted the police officer, and then resisted arrest. I don't believe the cops used excessive force

[@hectorabarron]

Gotta analyze incident by incident

[@trintivus]

I agree, he was entirely at fault. However, I don't know if an arrest for a swatted hand was necessary. They should of tried for 30 more seconds or so to calm him down, I would have.

[@mr70camarors]

No. And you're not a good human. No one deserves to be almost murdered because they resisted an assault by police.

[@stephenhill3286]

Idk. We need to stop normalizing the police slamming people's heads on the ground. It's dangerous

[@t.j.jeffries1263]

Agreed! I usually agree with ATA grading, but the "F" was unwarranted. It was Parks who charged towards the teenager in detainment, threatened him, then go aggressive with two cops trying to hold him back, and then subsequently handcuff him... I believe the actions of these cops was justified under the law.

[@furnjezy]

B+ ? Wrong! First of all the officers said they were not detaining him. And if so....the detainment was concluded.

[@TheBalthazarrrr]

It doesn't matter what they say. Cops can and will lie to you. That being said when you are pulled over by a cop you are defacto being detained. The second they turn on those lights legal or not they are actively detaining you by forcing you to stop and talk to them. Generally mutual conversations aren't started by being pulled over by police.

[@Romanus-]

He’s correct though. As disgusting as it is, those corrupt cops could have used it as an opportunity to arrest him as they would have loved that.

[@bchap1233]

@@Romanus-and he would’ve won a lot of money. Invoking rights shouldn’t hurt your grade

[@THEKNOW11]

Dude asked for a trip to the ground. The ground is hard.

[@653323895]

"trip to the ground" is a funny way of saying deadly force.

[@obaniehia]

so the second video, guy strait out made a death threat against a minor... not supporting or arguing against the use of force here but the phrase fuck around and find out exists for a reason

[@JamestheKilljoy]

"When pulled over, keep your hands on the wheel, dont make any sudden movements, and don't get out of the vehicle or you could get hurt or die." Sounds more like an encounter at Jurassic Park than with "peace officers". Giving someone a lecture for getting out of his own vehicle and utilizing his freedoms is some pathetic crap. If cops are this dangerous just having them around, we dont need em

[@faytleingod1851]

Honestly my opinion, is that because officers are held to a separate arm of the law, example they can break into houses, murder, assault, and get a vacation. It makes it to where they aren't concerned if they break the law. I truly believe this is the reason why officers handling country wide has been on a downward spiral. It's a tough job, if you do it correctly your still demonized. You do it wrong, there's no personal penalty and you give the badge and uniform a bad name. Just my two cents.

[@Libertaro-i2u]

And you MUST obey every command, even unlawful ones. Doing otherwise is an automatic ticket to jail or eternal vacation in the realm of the dead! The place to contest unlawful orders is the courtroom, not the side of the road!

[@mattbrown5511]

The traffic stop was over as soon as the so-called sergeant decided to pout and stomp off.

[@NonyaBuzinezz]

Pretty sure that guy was going to beat the shit out of the minor.

[@imvandenh]

You can't be serious. Making the threat in front of the cops is stupid enough but that I can see. I'm pretty sure he wouldn't have beat the kid up in front of them though. Then again I'm constantly surprised at how stupid people are.

[@dwaynesmith9482]

@@imvandenhhe did that in front of a cop and you really think he wasn’t gonna beat that kid. Seriously

[@overcominglifestrials5316]

The second case.....had the guy not want to be big and bad coming up and threatening this kid he wouldn't have ended up knocked out. When the cop says step back, step back. COMPLY! Why call the cops IF you wanna take the law in your own hands. The cops tried to push him back, but Parks jerked away, AND he also threatened to "smoke" the kid. Victim or not, you can't do that. By our own laws, everyone is INNOCENT until proven GUILTY. It's not the other way around.

[@653323895]

i agree with what you said you shouldn't do those things but does that justify being dumped on your head from chest high??? i mean that is deadly force. do you think "death or great bodily harm" was needed for an empty threat. there was 4 or more cops around.

[@RiverRat-2112]

Notice how quickly the supervisor "explains" something he did not witness. "They pulled you over for..." Now think back to how many times you have heard police say, " I wasn't here to see it...."

[@jackwang660]

Your second case rating is nonsense. The guy cleared showed agression toward the minor, and after putting his hands on cop and resisting arrest. I bet the judges will not rule excessive force.

[@653323895]

i mean yeah, but do you want the cop applying deadly force because someone is mad about crime or because of an empty threat.

[@Katstackz7414]

the cop could of handled the situation better.doesnt matter minor or not he was old enough to run the streets so he was old enough to kbnow better.the cop technical put his hands on dude and he pushed his hand back while backing up.picking someone up above your head like that and then slamming them on concrete is murderous intent period

[@ManuelHernandez-ue8ei]

@@Katstackz7414Have you ever worked as a Caregiver, Nurse, Firefighter? That dude looked like he was around 5'10 to 6' and probably weighed around 180 to 220 pounds. To pick someone up that is struggling to stay down you would need to look not into weight but the amount of Newton Meters of force need to pick that person up and then to pick him up over your head is a feet that would be nearly impossible even when. There were 2 or 3 people there. If that were the case they should all be in the Olympics for being able to lift that much and would win Gold medals. Learn the properties of physics first before you say some crazy thing like that.

[@Katstackz7414]

@@ManuelHernandez-ue8ei u must lick the boot. u bring physics into a siuation where more than 2 witnessess spoke on the officer picking that man up above his head 🤡.im 5'9 200 pounds and deff could pick a human being above my head and slam them your talking you ass lil dude🤣

[@Libertaro-i2u]

​@@ManuelHernandez-ue8ei This is America, the SI system is UNPATRIOTIC! To hell with newtons, meters, milliliters, etc!

[@harryk2336]

Great to see that applicants are properly vetted when accepted into the police academy

[@Don-mi6zl]

They do make sure they aren't above average in intelligence.

[@technne-gu1yu]

Yup "can you shoot with little reason? Do you have a history of psychotic behavior? How many times a hour do you beat your wife and kids?"

[@jessymfwilson]

@@technne-gu1yuYour comment had me laughing so hard lol

[@CD-vb9fi]

@@technne-gu1yu it's scary that your comment is too close to the truth while also being funny and terrifying at the same time.

[@CloranM]

I couldn't disagree with you more on the Auburn officers. I agree with every take you've ever had... this one is wrong in my opinion. Just let the cops do their jobs. The guy was an ass.

[@Jimulacrum]

In the first clip, he didn't get out of the vehicle during the traffic stop. The stop was concluded, and all the criminals in cop costumes had returned to their cars. He got out after that.

[@Mikaylalynette]

I think the first guy deserves an A+ tbh but I understand your reasonings

[@Mrwutevah]

A+ from a legal perspective, B+ when factoring in his personal safety in the light of unhinged cops escalating for much, much less.

[@Mikaylalynette]

@ I absolutely agree!

[@ZesPak]

I think the A- or B rating was warranted. It's very hard in such a situation to stay calm and be better, but that's what an A+ means. A+ is a perfect score. What he did in the end was justified, but, as AtA points out, dangerous. Plenty of times people have been arrested/tazed/shot for less because "he ran towards us aggressively".

[@donjohnson1416]

Do you think its a good idea to walk fast towards a cop yelling? I sure like my life and wouldnt want them to fear for theirs and use their gun OR tazer to protect themselves

[@donjohnson1416]

@@ZesPak EXACTLY. Only someone whos never had a job other than behind a desk would think its a good idea to jog towards an armed person while yelling at them. lol

[@tonyandraza5662]

ATA, I'm not sure I agree with the F grade for officers in the second encounter. The idea that this was excessive force hinges on the idea that the subject was purposely slammed head first into the ground which I am not convinced was the intent of the officer. I agree that the officer could have been more patient before engaging in a forceful takedown but based on the sequence of events, the officers had warrant to arrest him and the consequences are on the subject, not the officers. It's important to note that the original youth said that he had been chased, this subject threatened to 'smoke' the youth, physically approached in a threatening manner, and assaulted the officer giving then more than enough cause for their response. Had their been any indication that the officers intent was to slam the subjects head into the sidewalk, I would agree with the assessment but I see no evidence of that. Every citizen must recognize that they cannot approach another person with a threatening manner and must yield to the authority of police. Being angry is not an excuse. Had the subject landed on the grass or not head first in an uncontrolled takedown, I'm sure this would have turned out very differently. I'd say C- because there was no indication of imminent danger. More patience would have been reasonable.

[@AreaCode757]

that was my take as well….the kid was a smug little jerk off with a clear history of engaging in bad or even criminal behavior….. As a former police officer though it is difficult to determine if in the second video it was excessive or just an outcome of the totality of the resistance…..

[@marsstubblefield]

I counted 5 maybe 6? officers on the scene. This is more than enough personnel to prevent any of the combative citizens from getting within arm's reach of each other - which they should be doing. Clearly one of the angry citizens in the group is who called the police. Clearly the kid from the bush and his friends are annoying punks that cause trouble. The officers should recognize that potential volatility of the situation and take immediate steps to deescalate it. Instead, they let it get out of hand and then overreact.

[@SeriouslySteyn]

3:35 - Lol. Cop is doing a "well being check". Sure. That sounds legit. NOT! Just another lying cop. Pathetic. 🇿🇦🤙🏼

[@FrogsForBreakfast]

Methinks we should do a wellbeing check on the officer, since he's claiming to see things that don't match reality 😂

[@imvandenh]

Cops lie, that's their native language. They do it on and off the job constantly because they become so used to it.

[@MarsMan1]

A government that abuses its people or is tyrannical generates resistance to its rule. People who have been injured, maltreated, victimized, dishonored, or had close friends or relatives killed by the government, particularly by its security forces, may lash back at their government attackers. Thomas Jefferson ~ "When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty,"

[@Ironpine27]

I understand being upset in such situations, but being a dick and refusing to listen aren't really good ways to demand the other party not do the same. Respect goes both ways.

[@jimbojones9665]

Mr The Good did NOT get out of his vehicle during the traffic stop. He had been told clearly, and unambiguously, that he was not being detained.

[@tempusfugit9009]

went to my city hall 5 days ago for a foia, cops showed up at my door 2 days after asking for the papers so they could hand them in? how did they know where i live and why are police at my door askig about what info im wanting about government?

[@propagandaisnottrue2121]

Intimidation...

[@tempusfugit9009]

@@propagandaisnottrue2121 i held my wrists out said cuff me or kick rocks.

[@mattmanyam]

FOIA all traffic stops under "well-being check" for the last 2 years in Deland FL, and their circumstances and results.

[@jacksenic]

19:10 "I've never been in this bush before" - me and my friends talking about girls when we were 15

[@witch.in.hawaii]

A+ comment

[@SeriouslySteyn]

South Africa supports you! 😎🇿🇦🤙🏼

[@TheSilverSurfisher]

It’s also amazing the length of dialogue time these cops out here are willing to engage in when the suspect is “Jamie” instead of “Jerome”… the patience and tolerance contrast is Fuggin Outstanding!! and Mr. Parks got exactly what he should…smh…🙄

[@atk9989]

Slap a cops hand away while threatening someone and you will be arrested too, and if you resist being arrested then yes you get taken to the ground. This is not a case of racism and it's a trash argument to try to say it is.

[@KRich408]

He was Quickly Humbled! 😅 You don't do that the police in this situation were 100% right! He made a Verbal statement then attempted to force his way through the police to make good on his statement. .

[@653323895]

i dont what the government humbling people with deadly force because of an empty threat

[@MarkYoung-l8f]

A grown ass Man charging towards a skinny little teen and threatening a Detainee is unacceptable. The only suit will be the one he wears to court. The teen was in Police Custody, as such the Officers had an absolute Duty to protect their detainee. It was absolutely clear in the Video that he made the "Threats of Violence and tried to push an Officer out of the way to further harass and intimidate the Detainee. Taking or attempting to take the Law into ones own hands is in itself a Criminal Act.

[@mrkhrrs]

I'm hiding my jackbooted thuggery behind a facade of kindness.

[@dare2554]

Those 2nd officers don't deserve an F at all. There is no evidence he was "violently slammed" to the ground. There was a struggle and the officers used force necessary to arrest someone.

[@chuckjones3516]

The world is watching how ignorant our police are and it’s embarrassing to us.

[@Rooln1]

It’s about to get 100 times worse in the coming years

[@brutusbrabo]

Not “your” police brother. Police all over the western world are being shown up as the ignorant tyrants they are.

[@implodingllama2092]

@@Rooln1fantasy land

[@Rooln1]

@@implodingllama2092 I hope you’re right

[@tsbjelland]

@@implodingllama2092 Police have been promised Absolute Immunity in the near future. Although this would apply only in federal courts, every LEO defendant will be moving to transfer their case to the Feds. I see no reason that many, if not most, officers won't immediately take full advantage of this development.

[@jssamp4442]

The Graham case presents a quandary. It says excessive force is evaluated from the perspective of a reasonable officer. I would argue that this is an unreasonable standard. Where are we supposed to find a reasonable officer? I haven't yet met one. It is unreasonable to believe you should be allowed to commit crimes without punishment, but they all seem to believe just that.

[@emartin9795]

“Threatens to quote on quote “smoke him” if he catches him near his quote on quote “crib” again” This had me laughing for some reason

[@VendettaY]

SAME 😂😂

[@marsstubblefield]

I got pulled over by a police officer in Norwalk, CT in the early 1980s on my way to a friend's house with to-go Chinese food in the car. The officer claimed I ran a red light but it was yellow (one of the most common traffic stop scenarios ever). After a brief disagreement he went back to his car with my license. The mistake I made, in retrospect was to say that I was in a hurry because the food was getting cold. This gave him, I suppose, a higher level of reasonable suspicion that I ran the red light. But definitely gave him a reason to be a prick and make the stop take as long as possible which he proceeded to do. He only asked for my license at first and after 10+ minutes he returned to request my registration. I gave that to him and asked why he didn't request that with the license if he needed it and made sure to offer him my proof of insurance which he declined to take. He returned to his cruiser again and this time proceeded to take even longer. I exited my vehicle and approached the cruiser to ask what was taking so long. During the wait I had convinced myself that he was going to return a 3rd time to request the proof of insurance and I was tired of waiting. He got out and told me to get back in my car or I would be arrested. I immediately started to walk back to my car as he followed me. I asked over my shoulder how long this was gonna take and he said to just keep walking which I did. I didn't say another word and as soon as I touched the door handle of my card to open it, he placed me under arrest. That was clearly his intent from the moment I disagreed with him about the traffic light. Allowing police to behave this way is wrong. They shouldn't do it and they should have consequences to pay when they do.

[@valentinius62]

I knew cops were pricks back in the 1980s. I can't believe how many people say, "What happened? Cops used to be decent people long ago! 😳" Wrong. Anyway, sorry that happened to you.

[@justinrabbitt9492]

I should look into a dash cam plus even my own body camera to wear when I'm even just walking around in public.

[@Rustasious]

Gopros are relatively cheap if you buy an older model. Batteries don't last long I would say find one that has the voice features so it's easier to turn it on hands free while walking.

[@justinrabbitt9492]

@Rustasious my budget is tight, so for now, I'll be sure to use my phone and look into those options for the future.

[@drgirlfriend211]

@@justinrabbitt9492my first dash cam was under $50 on Amazon… my first “GoPro” was like 25$ on Amazon too… better battery life FOR SURE!

[@Dee-c1e]

This is a public service , he is awesome.

[@hiramabiff2017]

The simple reply is, " I am ok officer thank you & I do not need assistance ". And then tell him you are driving off. The is a time and a place to stand your ground and this was not really it. Once you tell him you are ok and you understand you are not being detained you drive off, and not go all wokey asking for a supervisor.

[@freddyjason3142]

How stupid can you be to walk up by the police and threaten to shoot someone? SMH people are insane.

[@Annie5825]

I’d like to know more about the 2nd story. What became of the juvenile? What’s the legality of threats to arrest his mother? Also, why did the cops jump to arresting the mother and not mention the father? Are moms more accountable for their children’s behavior than dads?

[@a_zombie_killaonpsn1572]

I'm more concerned that being outside while it is raining it is illegal to be outside.

[@invictusbp1prop143]

To allow cops to claim a concern for a driver's well being as justification for stopping and detaining effectively anyone they are willing to claim has driven in some undefined "unusual manner" just gives police a free pass to make unlawful stops to conduct fishing expeditions when they want to make life difficult on the targets of their choice.

[@TheLukemcdaniel]

or use it to harass someone they don't like

[@corbindallasmultipass]

It's simple: am I being detained? Am I free to go? If they reply yes and or no? Invoke the 5th and say no more.

[@julialibor9341]

EXACTLY I just don't understand people talking to cops, Anything you say is used against you 😡

[@Littlefoot.]

Sometimes. But other times it's important to have th officer verbalize on camera right on scene the who what when where why. That way they can't craft a narrative with a lawyer prior to trial.

[@craigmaltbie6365]

​@@julialibor9341Guy needed content for his channel.

[@conscientiousobserver8772]

Mostly. You're still obligated to provide certain information during a traffic stop, but I agree, mostly.

[@jmmahony]

The wording in the chief's statement from 30:36 to 30:43 is instructive: "Parks was lifted off the ground to 'decentralize' his balance" and "was taken to a 'platform' where he could be controlled" and "Upon 'reaching' (not "being thrown to") the ground...". Whenever an alleged authority figure uses so much uncommon and indirect terminology, it's a sure sign they're trying to cloud the picture.

[@billconley4239]

The most terrifying words you will EVER hear; "I'm with the government and I'm here to help". This police are NOT your friend !

[@Denizen-X]

Neglects to mention this was out of retaliation and dings the driver's grade for legally exiting his vehicle during a non-detention lol.

[@rocker198383]

I’m sorry but if a person is willing to make a death threat, to a child, in front of cops it’s fair to say that person is not thinking or acting rationally. If they then make physical contact with a cop it’s fair to think they would act on a physical threat. At that point they have made a death threat in front of a cop and started making physical contact, two things a majority of Americans will never do.

[@Emperorjaga]

Here we go!

[@Ca7bon]

I don't disagree often, but when you touch an officer like that, its gonna happen. At that point its a fight and nobody ever should have to think about the amount of force, only when

[@I_Am_Warden]

I give the driver an A. He has the right to leave the vehicle on an illegal traffic stop, and the people have to get out of this mindset of how cops think or believe because thats how they got all this damn authority in the first place, by licking their boots.

[@gmimi2]

👏👏👏 yep I agree.

[@privpi]

It's not about rights, it's about personal safety. While yes, he has the right to do so, he is actively, unfortunately, endangering himself in doing so.

[@bigdaddyjh2002]

L

[@xenosayain1506]

Risk factors. Getting out of the car and shouting like that is a very easy ti get assaulted and possibly killed over officer safety. The officer will have the local gov't to back him. All you have us your savings account and children's food money

[@danporath536]

One can be right, but end up in a situation that did not need to happen because they act hastily.

[@buysaverepeatandmore2047]

The thought process of a cop is scary. It is always infuriating when, after you ask for a supervisor, they then blame YOU for prolonging the reasonable (in their unhinged minds) stop because "you wanted a supervisor".

[@BlondieHappyGuy]

As of Nov 5th, YOU AIN'T SEEN NUFF'N YET! It will get worse. MUCH WORSE!

[@xenosayain1506]

How so? Defending the police movements partially got us here and neither side has moved against QA. If 1 party was trying to get rid of QA rather than just close police departments maybe a good arguement would exist

[@gabby8388]

Absolute immunity come January 😢

[@BlondieHappyGuy]

@@xenosayain1506 Good points!

[@xenosayain1506]

@@BlondieHappyGuy soooo. How is it going to get much worse?

[@danellabarnes-penman1118]

“I just got there! I’ve never been in this bush before!”

[@weistired]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@MadameBraynDamaj]

Arresting parents for the kids actions? Thats too insane. First off parents aren't allowed to punish their kids or thats abuse and now a parent is in trouble for another persons actions? Things are getting so wrong in America. Government wants full control of everyones life.

[@Mike-ub5pk]

So you can raise kids with no responsibility or integrity?!? THAT IS THE PROBLEM WITH SOCIETY

[@perfectlyharmless]

16:45 Cop: "I'm going to arrest your mother." Can they do that??? 😮

[@jodyhoo]

The second video with excessive force was disgusting. The chief’s approval of that force is the reason this police violence on citizens perpetuates.

[@653323895]

yep they back the blue no matter who

[@Libertaro-i2u]

Well, the violence wouldn't happen if serf citizens complied with police orders.

[@653323895]

@@Libertaro-i2u yeah you back the blue until it happens to you

[@zackkousa]

"I've never been in this bush before"

[@Jobs92742]

Driver needs attorney shield

[@ken_in_atx9619]

“I’ve never been in this bush before” 🤣😂🤣😂

[@andrewvirtue5048]

If it was a genuine welfare check the cop would say something like: " _I saw you doing 'x' which I don't see to often so it's not normal. Are you okay, going through anything?_ " ~" Yeah i'm fine " ...mayyyyybe add a quick summary. " _Okay well we'll be around if you need to call 911_ " and that should be the end of that.

[@noanyobiseniss7462]

When he exited the vehicle IT was no longer a Stop as he had already been communicated that the stop was over long before the Sargent arrived.

[@hoodiemonster_gaming2922]

I understand him being upset about the stop but getting out of the car and walking towards the officers car while screaming at them is very stupid of him.

[@IR-fl2tl]

20:24Threatens to quote unquote “smoke him” if he catches him near his quote unquote “crib”. Lmao!! 😂 😂

[@sporty196071]

Now drivers pull off the road to use the phone. If they wanted to check on him they could have pulled along side and asked him if he needed help

[@templetonpeck393]

I would argue that he didn't get out of the car DURING a traffic stop. The traffic stop was over. He was told he was no longer detained, and he was already pulled over there when he was lit up.

[@scottelder3141]

Officer said he wasn't detained. Stop was over

[@marklindsey579]

First, it wasn't an actual traffic stop. Second the stop was over. He had every right to exit the vehicle

[@stephenhill3286]

Yep

[@fergurbruger21]

All the officers stood there backing up that excessive force. "Its just the bad apples" The whole trees been rotting.

[@653323895]

💯

[@whycantwealljustgetalong1050]

Not to totally defend this because as i understand it this is retaliation, but my uncle was saved thanks to a stop like this. He was having a heart attack.

[@blindliberty4478]

He was told that he was no longer detained and was allowed to leave the scene... he is not only legally allowed to exit his vehicle but is morally obligated to confront the officers.

[@Libertaro-i2u]

Well, law trumps morality.

[@blindliberty4478]

@@Libertaro-i2u and both are on his side

[@Libertaro-i2u]

@blindliberty4478 Well, technically law is morality

[@blindliberty4478]

@Libertaro-i2u well yeah, the lowest form, I couldn't think of a lower form

[@GeneralBlorp]

“I’m with the government and I’m here to help you. 😈” -Reagan

[@anomalous34]

B+? No. The officers stated it was NOT a traffic stop and they are even actively pulling away as he exits.

[@thepoofster2251]

I dont think you understand the purpose of the grading

[@dmacrolens]

@@thepoofster2251 You obviously don't understand the purpose of a KZbin comment. Fuck wit.

[@RageMojo]

@@thepoofster2251 We very much understand. And at no time should citizens attitude be a factor in the grading. He broke no law and AtA admits the rating is completely based on the cops cowardice.

[@jasonj3752]

@@RageMojo do you never watch the videos? Citizens attitudes affect gradings all the time. and in this case it wasn't the "attitude" that lowered his grade, it was the exiting the car with the attitude that lowered the grade... he should have just gone to the police station to file the report, don't get out and give the cops a "reason"

[@kevinvilmont6061]

Officers referred to that as “dumping”somebody. They control their arms leg, sweep them and then bodyslam them, and they can’t break their fall. Every cop knows what dumping somebody means. It’s common for practice and systemic.

[@653323895]

sounds evil doesnt it???