15. Speed of light in moving medium ► kzbin.info/www/bejne/jYLJont6qK10kK8
@sudh_nshu2 жыл бұрын
Real talented Physics teacher... Hats off sir
@vivekasarkar53798 ай бұрын
Bengalis are The Talented People...!!! 🌝❤️✨
@doutormanhattan5680 Жыл бұрын
I will never forget about the first video that I saw on your channel. I was looking for something about radioactive decayment. I was struck by the illuminating way you explained things. Thank you.
@vulcandarthvader66173 жыл бұрын
Sir, you have a really amazing time way of explaining things! I admire your teaching a lot and your videos very interesting as always! Hope your channel reaches out to many more people! May mass×acceleration always be with you! 🙏
@lakshgoyal13243 күн бұрын
There is no one who can remain without action even for a moment. Indeed, all beings are compelled to act by their qualities born of material nature (the three guṇas
@bhavana.1299 Жыл бұрын
At 15:42, the numerators for inverse Transforms of uy, uz are slightly off! Numerator for uy should have been uy(dash)*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2). Similar correction for uz. For the rest, the video is perfect! :)
@_boss_baby_3 жыл бұрын
sir your way of explanation is really amazing, your videos are clearing my all doubts related to relativity Thanks a lot
@Ravi_4772 жыл бұрын
The way you explain is great sir 👍
@asishpanda35473 жыл бұрын
Love the way u teach man. Making every bit very clear
@sutopamodak62472 жыл бұрын
Your whole relativity playlist is awesome..... ❤️❤️❤️❤️ I've just completed it.
@DarthLala1063 жыл бұрын
Discovered your channel yesterday, and am currently studying the same topic. Waiting eagerly for Relativistic Doppler Effect as well as effect of medium speed, as these are the only things a bit confusing. Thanks for this clear and amazing lecture.
@dhruv0x0x02 жыл бұрын
finally concept smjh agya, adbhut anand ki anubhuti horhi hai 🤩
@vanshtibrewal4791 Жыл бұрын
❤️ best teacher
@harshrathi7767Ай бұрын
Very nice explanation sir.Thank you🙏❤
@sreekumargopakumar102 жыл бұрын
I am so glad I listened to this video. Goes to explain the momentum equations in a later video.
@PUBGgamer-kf5vz3 жыл бұрын
Great video... Sir why sicronisation happen?
@worldfromhome40332 жыл бұрын
Clear and to the point explanation .Thank you sir
@rajuranjankumar16953 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir for this crystal clear explanation 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
@anupamamadushani-v3g Жыл бұрын
Sir i understood lessons as well .thank you sir to help to us to improve our knowledge . I was amazing when you teaching .good luck.❤❤❤
@ktstech37636 ай бұрын
hey sir your teaching is really awsm!!
@stfjemam35079 ай бұрын
Great video sir, Good detailing and Break down of Equations as well as presenting their significance, Really loved it. God bless you ❤
@RohitKumar-jv1is3 жыл бұрын
You are great 🙏🙏
@manaoharsam4211 Жыл бұрын
Good explanation.
@muskansharma4332 жыл бұрын
Well explained sir.... 👏👏have understood it clearly.. Thank you so much!
@nehaseth27933 жыл бұрын
Interesting...Have not completed the video yet😅 but i know it is going to be interesting 😃
@Ravi_4772 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir 🙏🙏
@zyadkhater17722 жыл бұрын
great explanation. thank you
@MsParticle2 жыл бұрын
There is a small error in the expressions of inverse velocity transformation for uy and uz shown at 15:18. Thanks for such very knowledgeable videos. Got to learn many things from your videos that are difficult and time consuming if one goes to books. Thanks and keep going :-)
@rimjhimpaul04 Жыл бұрын
yes
@Ravi_4772 жыл бұрын
Nice sir
@Johan-yy9pk2 жыл бұрын
amazing explanations sir, thanks
@physicszoneshubham34783 жыл бұрын
Perfect explanation sir
@aremijfaye51602 жыл бұрын
Why is that in velocity composition law if ux'=-v ux is 0, and undefined (0/0) if ux=c and v=-c?
@RAJSINGH-hn8yq2 жыл бұрын
Thank u ❤️
@sbkarajan2 жыл бұрын
This is good explanation of relative velocities, but how about the actual distances traveled? How does length contraction and time dilation for UFO A and B play here?
@markkennedy97675 ай бұрын
Thanks for this. Around 9:00-9:30, I don't understand how the following has to be the case mathematically: If ∆t approaches zero when ∆t' approaches zero, then lim ∆x'/∆t' as ∆t approaches zero is equivalent to lim ∆x'/∆t' as ∆t' approaches zero. Why is this. I mean just because ∆t and ∆t' both approach zero, it doesn't mean that the limits above have to be the same, does it. If so, why would this be the case mathematically? Thanks.
@TheViscweaver Жыл бұрын
Hi, I am also from IIT Kanpur physics PG 1972 batch. I wish to share a GeoGebra file showing Graphic Relativistic addition of velocities. Sliders are included for your students to have hands on feel for changes in frame & object velocities. Nice work by you
@aamid_riyaz Жыл бұрын
Instead of reinventing the wheel, we can exploit the fact that u’=γ (x-vt) and t’=γ (t-ξx) are parametric equations dependent on t s.t x’:t↦ x’(t) and t’:t↦ t’(t) Now, consider dx’/dt = (dx’/dt’)(dt’/dt) by chain rule If dt’/dt :≠ 0 on some interval, then dx’/dt’ = (dx’/dt)/(dt’/dt) Therefore dx’/dt’= u’= γ (u-v)/ γ (1-ξu) = (u-v)/ (1-ξu) where ξ = v/c^2 and u= u_sub(x)
@gauravhasija833 жыл бұрын
Nicely done video.🙏
@dharmvirsingh42777 ай бұрын
Sir I have a question. Rocket A started from a point 10 crores km away from a goal at velocity of 2 lakh km/second another rocket B started at the same time from middle point at the velocity of 1 lakh km/second in linear direction.what will be their relatve speed as per special theory of relativity ? Will they reach at the goal simultaniously or not ?
@student9226 Жыл бұрын
Dear Sir, What will happen S' frame is moving in Y direction with velocity V
@reidmortensen26293 жыл бұрын
If observer S1 was instead going in the same direction in velocity as the spaceship in question, and we agree that time dilates as we approach the speed of light, and we also agree that the speed of light is a universal constant; could we postulate that one could in fact proceed beyond the speed of light by maintaining that same velocity constant in a time dilation that also approaches the speed of light? I’m not sure how to properly word the question that I’m asking. Essentially this: if we exist at a speed approaching the speed of light, would we be able to tell since light behaves consistently in the dilation we exist in? And if not, could we use a relativistic speed in a specific frame of reference and then accelerate another object to a relativistic speed within that initial frame of reference? And if we could, would that object “slow down” or carry its time dilation with it? Somewhat of a supercavetation for space time, in theory? Forgive me if you’ve dealt with questions like this or if they come across underinformed.
@The_Spy__3 жыл бұрын
You are just awesome ❤️
@Imran52Feb2 жыл бұрын
Why the Space ships' velocities don't add 🤔, though it is true for light as per my understanding I.e, 2c is not possible . What happens in the Hadron Collider where v is close to c ? I'm confused. Please enlighten me.
@adityasingh41232 жыл бұрын
Sir agr ap hindi mai pdate to pdne mai or bhi mja ata thanku so much sir
@jaanwarborris58482 жыл бұрын
When we derived Lorentz transformation, we assumed that the relative motion was happening only along x-dimension. Here however the object has a velocity component in all the three dimensions. Why are we using the same equations should we need not to derive a different set of equations for this case.
@arnavkumar5380 Жыл бұрын
But S' frame is moving with v in only x direction.
@Vikas-hs9cl3 жыл бұрын
Keep uploading
@lakshgoyal13243 күн бұрын
wow a britisher looking like Indian !
@doutormanhattan5680 Жыл бұрын
For instante, if we had this two objects going in opposite directions each with 100% of the speed of light, if we substitude in the transformation eqn, we will get u' = c.
@shivamdellwork4682 жыл бұрын
Doubt in problem solving section (16:14):Will it even yield the same result if I will attach s(prime/dash) frame with earth and s frame with a spaceship. I tried it but got wrong result. Ans in this scenario came out to be 0.72c
@shivamdellwork4682 жыл бұрын
I would be really grateful if anybody could explain this. Thanks in advance
@harshrathi7767Ай бұрын
No, you should assign s frame with B coz question asks velo of A wrt 'B' so one frame of reference must be at B
@ugursoydan81873 жыл бұрын
What would be if we have done this proof with length contraction and time dilation? If we do this proof with that way we will find another result. In that case we would find an equation which says the relative velocity of the object from the referance frame of the other moving object is smaller than the velocity of the object from the referance frame of the standing (which has no velocity) object. this is a contradiction.
@nader6632 Жыл бұрын
15:30 the inverse transformation for y and z are written wrong😅
@doutormanhattan5680 Жыл бұрын
15:25 the right equations are not correct. They are not simetric. Anyway, you're great!