DIGITAL 60FPS HD FPV - FPV BLUE - Tech Tuesday UAVFUTURES

[@UAVfutures]

Very exciting stuff, may not be perfect or drone racing right now but maybe one day. fpv.blue also bonus for anyone who actually reads the comments, Aomways commanders are in stock and on sale for $300 - bit.ly/aomwayFPV

[@drakinfpv9629]

UAVfutures so you know thats not a legal frequency to use in aus 😁

[@UAVfutures]

because the whole world knows the value of the USD vs their own currency.

[@AllanSanderson77]

Yeah, but can't use this in Australia, can only send video on 2400-2483.5 MHz and 5725-5875 MHz.

[@jarrodbath2375]

Nice job again Stu !!! Some people always seem to miss the point !!

[@KM-ms7up]

UAVfutures first paragraph of description you wrote "gong" instead of going

[@lucid5994]

Oh come on! You could have at LEAST plugged it in and showed us what it looks like on a screen

[@deltageek7177]

Probably won't unless Stew gets his amateur radio license! Not legal otherwise in Australia. With his large KZbin following he did the right thing by not even implying he turned it on. I'm sure there would be haters ready to rat him out.

[@wolff2233]

Definately the wrong reviewer then

[@lucid5994]

Steven Kennard lol you obviously didn't comprehend my comment.

[@LordRedstone783]

you obviously didn't understand the ramifications of him trying to use a low frequency band without a radio license. low frequencies can get you in a lot of trouble with local law

[@BrentonSmiith]

Could just come for a drive up to NSW where you can fly with these.

[@LACCALIFORNIA]

Im loving Tech Tuesdays, it's awesome!! I like that you show new stuff for all flyers and experience levels. I've been able to stay in the hobby thanks to you and the rest of youtube.. keep up the great work.

[@wildbill4680]

Do you fly with this? Searched your videos but couldn’t find a follow up. Might be nice to put on your 8” long range quads??

[@jairajmahadev2147]

Is there a jet engine in the background!?

[@guffel89]

Dragon Dung sounds like a washing machine

[@D_H_88_99]

Dragon Dung vacuum cleaner probably

[@AelDiaoul]

On every video the sound is terrible...

[@DarkR3ignlol]

+Antoine Bertin agree, he should invest in a good Sound setup. At least a good microphone. This small thingy just doesnt sound well.

[@D_H_88_99]

InsertNameHere Its always amateur hour. I agree, I do a lot of work with audio and unfortunately our pal Stu here is clearly no professional. Background noise can be eliminated in software easily enough.

[@rl2109]

That is exciting technology! It's just a matter of time until HD systems like this are nearly as small as current FPV cams...! Thanks for posting!

[@jesusgalicia3272]

Mate, love your channel but what I did love the most of this video was your washing machine at the background lol

[@UAVfutures]

i know right, ads that bit of charm,

[@richardt1]

With a new baby, it probably runs 24/7.

[@Consti77]

Love your tech tuesday videos!

[@martykracher]

In a year or two, it'll be the size of the analog system, and all we use. Thanks for the video!

[@CRayTechVlog]

Im really happy to see more steps being taken to get real HD footage from our flights.

[@timeanspace]

Can't wait to see what this footage looks like and how the build goes.

[@hygrometer]

i like the evolved intro now as in the last few vids. Thanks for your efforts!

[@henryread-spinks4060]

Hey stu doesn't 1.3 require a ham license?

[@lukasmakessomething7322]

Henry Read-Spinks does that apply in Australia?

[@sputniksam]

Hi Henry Each region has its own regulations. In the USA, I believe, holding a Technician Class Amateur license will allow you to use 1.2GHz -1.3GHz but the equipment will need to conform to FCC directives to allow it to be sold on the domestic market. Here in the UK a Foundation level amateur radio license will again permit you to use those frequencies on a secondary user basis. HOWEVER, in the UK there is no provision that permits the use of amateur radio on any airborne platform, full size or model. The only options that legally exist in the UK are those covered by the ISM and SRD specifications (license exempt) in segments of the 433MHz, 459MHz, 800MHz, 2400MHz, and 5800MHz, allocations. I've held a full amateur radio license for over thirty years and these restrictions are a source of much frustration when it comes to the applications to SUAV's and FPV.

[@BB-mk1er]

Whats a "Haych"?

[@00whynot]

Its a hach dee transmitter. Werent ya listnin

[@BB-mk1er]

00whynot !lolololol! Thats some juicy Haych dee FPV! Stew is the man!

[@blackterminal]

Penetration on analogue is not a fault it's because your using 5.8ghz. use low frequency. Also digital when it reaches its limit it just cuts out. You'll still see something with analogue

[@509FUN]

Crazy how this was only 3 years ago

[@unixoid33]

After 3 months, and still no normal review tests range etc?

[@sammythekat6015]

This would be great for a long range wing right?

[@tomrosch8690]

Probably, but digital has one disatvantage, which might make ist less relaiable in Long Range flights. You of cours will get great Video and no breakup, but the dropouts (if they occure) are much more severe. You get a black Screen or a freez frame, with angalog Video you get breakup but can still see some pieces. And I also think, that you get better range with a analog 1.3 GHz setup with good antennas. But the experience while flying would definitely be better, but you are missing the osd.

[@FpvBlue]

Hey, we have an embedded OSD, supporting Vector and Mavlink inputs! Check out bonafidepirate's video for more!

[@tomrosch8690]

fpvblue Oh, thats great. I didn't know that.....

[@nara4420]

Hello Stu, can you mount and fly with it ? Even if you can't record it directly a personal opinion would be nice. And of course we all want to hear the GT-rating .

[@Migueldeservantes]

One only can but wonder if they will be selling it this product again! looking on the RCgroups forum, the guy that was making them don't seem to enthusiastic about making the next batch...

[@richardt1]

At a seven mile range I wonder how would you maintain control at that distance, also, how would you stay in the air long enough for a round trip?

[@ewanread258]

I reckon something like this would be great on a fixed wing. Take advantage of the wing.

[@yattiyada]

That's a whole lot of stuff going on a quad!

[@deadmoo83]

How much does a Go Pro Session weigh? The weight may not be that bad for freestyle if you don't need a separate HD camera anymore.

[@tamarathompson9418]

Omg . A Must have for long range flights.

[@uribarcelona1]

what if at least you turn it on? I love you reviews but this one is useless :(

[@joematarc5245]

where do you buy it? it is always sold out.

[@jamesdeklerk2120]

Stew, can you review the new Furibee's, especially the GT 215mm Fire Dancer and the Furibee QAV220. I am really interested in them

[@sqwert654]

Its looks nice for a search a rescue setup. Still massive in size for quad though. Give it a coupe of years I think

[@sqwert654]

lets hope so. Still the problem of latency. 50ms is pretty big. Although I have been flying with Runcam Split and not noticed much lag. But I would think top racers would.

[@amisoftau2659]

Agree no good for actual racing. But great for cruising; and probably easy fit on any 7" or bigger quad. Also good on any wing. I want one :). So for Aus, we probably want the 2.4Ghz version I suppose?

[@unixoid23]

its more for planes. you now nat nall people fly on quads

[@REVIEW_JUJUR]

What about Lightbridge ??? Why no RC Airplane use Lightbridge ??? My phantom 3pro can go up to 4.5km with HD video link.

[@stanleymclain402]

Working on going away from heavy go pros on the top.. can't wait to see where it goes.

[@lorinczisti01]

Feedback: The usual two links are missing at the end of the video (watching on my android tablet)

[@MAGITSIK]

Do you have a washing machin in the room?

[@LurifaxDK]

What is that smaller camera he is comparing it to? I can't hear what he is saying. :-)

[@MarianoCarpentier]

Ughhh!! I've been looking for this since I started with the hobby. I can not wait to see your thoughts on this and also grumpy Trev's. Do you know if that works with current googles?

[@marionavarro8229]

Mariano Carpentier See Eachine Goggles Two.

[@MarianoCarpentier]

Yes! I actually fly with the Goggles Two, but I wanted to upgrade to something more Fatshark alike, so I was wondering if I should postpone the upgrade until this HD technology takes off.

[@marionavarro8229]

Mariano Carpentier Fatshark has something in 720p.. but it's more expensive with less resolution.

[@asalas88]

What would you say is the best fpv camera to get right now?

[@corywilliamsmith]

Long range baby! This is awesome. I can't wait to see something like this on @rctestflight solar glider for long range flights or something!

[@sonisagar8201]

Where can I buy it?

[@LeoTheHuman]

Well, I haven't seen any info here, except the fact that there's such a product...

[@willmercier2852]

Lol are those antennas or drum sticks? They're huge!

[@EnzoM]

Should I get the Eachine-EV100's or should I get some basic box goggles?

[@picojujutsu]

Enzo M. If you are going to spend that much you should get high end box goggles. Either the eachine ev800d or eachine goggles 2. From what I have seen the boscam gs922 goggles look like the best cheap goggles but I've never used them

[@ReDDeMoN83]

gooooooood ddddddaaaaayyyyy! love your show! cant wait to see the flight footage.

[@sjohbandevos1913]

the amount of drones you have is enormous i just started but want the same amount damn

[@lostjohnny9000]

Check out the disclaimer on the fpv.blue order confirmation page: "I won't use this to build nuclear submarines, any kind of military technology whatsoever or use it in anything but civilian applications. I will not use, ship or resell the unit to any country in the ITAR's embargoed list or violate ITAR in any other way."

[@zookcruzr1]

I hope they can get it smaller. And lower latency. Looking forward to the testing stu

[@FenderRealm]

There will always be latency with digital given the image is processed. 40ms is pretty darn good.

[@adi-yf3vs]

I was interested since i first saw it on rc groups a year ago

[@reezlaw]

This bad boy is such a bad boy, what a bad boy bad boy bad boyyy

[@UAVfutures]

"What ya gonna do when they come for you"

[@zojo4486]

Hummmm...what if they add an SDcard to record HD like a Runcam Split??? you save the weight of a go pro to cover for the VTX...

[@martinturner5484]

If you are going to demo systems like this you might want to go in to the legalities of it in Australia. Its not C-Ticked at all (its still in development) and as far as I can tell uses frequencies that aren't legal to use here.

[@MatthewTaylor3]

Too bad this was discontinued. I'd have considered buying it, since I don't want to invest any more in DJI's ecosystem.

[@fpvbros9447]

1.3 legal in Aus?

[@intelbreak]

looks amazing! but €549 is a little steep ill stick with my $15 banggood vtx for a while i guess ;) also i'm assuming flight video incoming?

[@ken-kamm]

Not sure how you could say the Connex stuff is bigger. The Connex racing antenna is about the same size as our analog antennas. These 1.3ghz antennas are MUCH bigger. You need to compare the two side by side. Also this VTx is what, 10-15 grams heavier than ProSight? I was hoping Fpv blue could be used on a mini quad but that’s not looking too promising.

[@marionavarro8229]

kenkamm This is intended for planes at first.

[@ken-kamm]

Mario Navarro Yes I’m aware of that but some folks are going to put these on small fast drones, I can guarantee you that.

[@KrotowX]

And now we have DJI HD FPV and HDZero/SharkByte - both of them are noticeably smaller and works better.

[@appeltaart4944]

i don't think it is going be a game changer at almost 700 dollars

[@MatthewTaylor3]

DJI certainly has been a game changer (not from my personal experience) and it costs even more.

[@TheMasterhazard]

some competition for connex prosight ... Finally! :D would be good on a 7" or 8" long range setup, you would barely feel it :)

[@MrCineris]

The way to go would simplify using the image quality of our crappy but fast analogs to try to cut that latency and keep the digital link range and steadiness

[@amisoftau2659]

But I think that the primary aim is for a higher resolution video feed..

[@stout890]

why does it sound like a jet engine is spooling up and down in the background?

[@vladoportos]

I was wandering if I turned on washing machine or not the whole time :D

[@Zeaiclies]

I know that there is digital technology that is the same size and weight as the analog and with no latency but it is tied up with the military. However, once they move on to something new and better, eventually it will trickle out to the civilian market.

[@TheRattleSnake3145]

I thought you needed a licence for 1.3ghz? The connex system is a joke at 300m range or what ever it is.

[@Nici619]

i wait for the bg clone ;-)

[@Dougie-mr2hp]

Dunno about the antenna. My Prosight mini antenna is much smaller and better designed. Only downside is 500m range. But where I fly it's fine. Good to see another HD rig though.

[@marionavarro8229]

Dale Pattison It's a lot of better than prosight. No comparison in image quality. See the bonafidepirate video.

[@FenderRealm]

It's actually a VAS 1.3 V antenna. You're not comparing the same thing... The 2.4 version obviously will be smaller.

[@MarkFord]

I hope you helped the missus hang that load of washing out Stu ;)

[@Emilskidor]

i think im gonna wait with buying googles until theese have lower latancy and there are googles made specifically for digital so i guess im flying my new furibee x215 line of sight since i smashed my old x220

[@iRoNiiC_H3R0]

Ah this is perfect for planes

[@stecozz4907]

Gonna need a big quad/plane for that! haha Stick with my monster v2 16:9 for now,best quality imo.

[@D_H_88_99]

That would be great on a massive slope soaring glider way up in the clouds

[@MontanaMichael]

Love your vids!

[@Xistn]

"tech Tuesday" where??

[@drewb213]

Wow that's 650.00, hope they're good

[@markbryan7859]

Anyone else laugh a little when he says HD?

[@devildron]

And TODAYY!!!!!!!!

[@neilrobertson1345]

Be intresting off latency times

[@grumpydude1598]

they should have put a sd card slot on the transmitter imo, also, for a 700€+ price, 5 mins is quite short for something like this, not even flight footage, stu come on

[@SubjektDelta]

I want some 144 or 240fps stream.. Gamer's have standards ;P

[@amisoftau2659]

Lol..

[@BeastlyKings]

Slowly increasing high pitch noise in your video? Ouch!

[@jarredheitzenrater5159]

I need someones help. I posted a video about the problem im having with my eachine x220 wizard

[@LAHegarty]

Make it wired, almost zero latency.

[@nickcrownshaw]

Shame about the price costs more than the Connex if you add in diversity

[@metoo3918]

Nick Crownshaw Wow. If thats the case, why come to market with this? If you cant do it smaller, tougher, cheaper, you better do it waaaayyy better.

[@TheRogueThunder]

huuurrrrrrrrrry and get it on a drone!

[@bluefire87HN]

Not Legal in Italy! DAMN!! 1.2 Ghz

[@FenderRealm]

They are going to be making 900mhz and 2.4Ghz versions also

[@mfpv_detroit8182]

Nice mate

[@ilovefishing943]

i live in australia

[@did3d523]

too big

[@mins_982]

I'll still stick to analog...

[@littled10100]

Haytch Dee.

[@jeffw8369]

Love how he says HD. HAYTCH D. Lol

[@frinky]

😱😱😱

[@CZDrMike]

Yeah, you want longer range? Get a license and run 1.3Ghz analog... you are comparing two very very different things.

[@DIRTYDOO]

Way to expensive

[@99395985h]

finally

[@alasdair4161]

HD FPV to break the bank.. It would want to be pretty damned good for around a thousand bucks AU. Give it a few weeks and the Chinese clones will be shipping for a couple of hundred..

[@Karniak91]

€ 675 enjoy crash

[@unixoid23]

i can fly on analog with crap video

[@Karniak91]

it might be good stuff but price and weight is big no no for racing for some pro camera drone it might be good choice

[@_owen]

First

[@UAVfutures]

first first, you win the internet today sir

[@_owen]

lol

[@RimmyTimfpv]

Darn you

[@RimmyTimfpv]

First