Do Dinosaurs Show Evidence of Design? - Dr. Marcus Ross

[@JesusAlleineRettet]

Imagine the power the authority to create all of this at once just by a spoken word. I am too small to cope with this.

[@spatrk6634]

creating stuff with spoken word is called conjuration by incantation

[@aurafireheart]

Personally I think there were dinosaurs on the ark, but later generations of humans hunted them to extinction after humans began to spread out over the earth again. And keeping in mind the term dinosaur wasn't coined until much later. We really don't know the full extent of what happened after the flood. But I do agree it definitely points to an intelligent designer.

[@PauloPereira-jj4jv]

No way there were dinos in the ark. Let's not go so far.

[@craig5477]

Excellent. It’s a crime that this isn’t at least an option that is taught in our schools so our children are able to see that this complex living system we are a part of could not just miraculously develop over time. A creator is a necessity for a rational mind

[@1SuperMind]

An intelligent creator, not any creator. Without intelligence nothing of high complexity can come out in an instant of time by random chance. There would be needed billions and billions of trials and errors for even a complex eye to develop by a random chance. Nobody can pass an exam by a random chance. The existence of a highly sophisticated intelligence is the only answer. But, children are not given freedom to think and reason by their own intelligence. They are being brainwashed in the modern schools. Only an intelligent mind can prove the existence of God, but if you go to school you will damage your brain, and you will never be able to understand what is God.

[@1SuperMind]

@lol lol Sorry, I didn't read your comment.

[@cd8086]

@lol lol I don’t get why people think the only logic answer is that we were created … last time I checked there is no evidence that points to one answer or another when it comes to how we were created, how the universe was created, etc.. Why can’t people just accept that we don’t know? Instead they have to comfort themselves with believing in things that may or may not exists. Humans know nothing of the universe.

[@craig5477]

@@cd8086 Faith by definition means we don’t have proof. So the question is why have faith. That’s something only you can answer for yourself. My answer for me wouldn’t help you in any case

[@matthewstokes1608]

@@cd8086because some of us DO know that God exists… we are in communion and would happily die for Him… Why don’t you ignoramae actually listen for once?

[@redhedhik-chik2510]

I live in Ohio; in Brown county, many whole fossils can be found. However, in Highland county, where we now live, we find corals and sponges in the deepest parts of our woods. I am now a Grandmother and love finding these and teaching our grandchildren about the biblical flood. God never ceases to amaze me.

[@rubiks6]

When I was a child, my family went to visit other family in Wheeling, West Virginia, a mountainous place. The children there took my sister and me to see a place where there were piles of seashells. School teachers would have us believe geological processes pushed ancient ocean floors up into mountains. I never bought that story. - To atheists, enough time can solve any problem but that's malarky.

[@jred7]

@Ric Rovey not in my Bible.

[@redfaux74]

@Ric Rovey - No, only one world wide Biblical flood. Get a KJV Bible.

[@redhedhik-chik2510]

@Judy Hinterlong hey Judy. Romans 1:20 is an amazing scripture for it says that 'creation is evidence of God's divine nature....so men are without excuse' (Paraphrasing). It is a great verse! God revealed much to Paul; I am convinced he knew what he was talking about 😊 I live close to Serpent Mound and have thought often about it's origin. One thing I've learned is if we see God's hand in nature, they surely did! Remember this: God destroyed the Earth with water so Serpent Mound was created post flood in which all the descendants were offspring of Noah (who was a descendant of Adam). Also, even in Israel we see created earthworks. Was this man's way of worship? God directed us from Moses's era not to make images of animals but yet, worldwide we see that men from long ago disobeyed. One thing I've learned is this: human nature is still the same. What we desire and seek, so did our ancestors. I live on the Paint Creek region and many times we find artifacts from that same era on our farm. God Bless Judy! Stay in God's Word ❤

[@redfaux74]

@Michael Fritsche Go away troll. I'm not interested in becoming your convert. But thanks... 🧐

[@Hobgoblin88]

(Edit; this is a retorical question pointed towards creationists but it appears that it goes over to the heads of many of my fellow atheists.) If all extinct animals lived and died at once, why aren't there any giant insects, non-avian dinosaurs and giant sloths together in the same layer?

[@Hobgoblin88]

@@TheDivineGods863 really?!! I'm not the one you need to confince of that Captain Obvious😂

[@mrdude945]

Ye ikr imagine not knowing how paleontology and geology works lol

[@nf191]

Giant sloths have not been around the same time with dinosaurs? Generally, mammals haven't been large in the time period of the dinosaurs? The permian period is when giant bugs co-existed with dinosaurs, where have you seen that it's the case that they aren't located in the same layer and below?

[@Hobgoblin88]

@@nf191 yeah duhhh... I get the feeling my fellow atheists are reading my question (pointed at creationists) wrong...

[@hyperkaioken4982]

bruh

[@Jk47rocky23]

A masterpiece always has a creator .

[@1SuperMind]

An intelligent creator. There are bad creators also.

[@Akimikinaak]

At least these guys admit dinosaurs were real. I'll give them that

[@koach7779]

😂

[@laserfan17]

Lol.

[@Mr4twitch]

Some think they were on noah's ark.

[@BakkerSamuel]

Why would he not admit..?

[@Akimikinaak]

@@BakkerSamuel fundamentalism

[@obiwanduglobi6359]

In his own dissertation, Dr. Ross studied the extinction of mosasaurs and came up with a time span of approximately 65 Million years. Does he now revoke his own results?

[@kmaterne]

Hans De Mos His creationist views have a lot more credibility, than someone that believes everything came from nothing. That’s the stupidest theory ever thought of, by a human being.

[@carljones8334]

@@kmaterne That and the thinking that there is no God.

[@chasecharland1160]

@@hansdemos6510 I enjoyed seeing someone who understands logic, thing don't come from nothing, it's just that you don't know where it came from. A child could look at a tree and say "that came from the earth, thereof trees grow from nothing, but that is only because the child doesn't know what a seed is or how it got there. I think the problem for both religious ppl and academics is that they are at war with one another. Just because there is evolution doesn't mean there is no God, or just because there is god doesn't mean there can't be evolution.

[@chasecharland1160]

@@hansdemos6510 oh I agree, I have a friend who is jahova witness, he doesn't believe in evolution, one day I sat down and read through 40 some odd pamphlets, the watchtower or what ever it called, I was deeply troubled by it, clearly they cherry pick certain science and then mold it to fit their narrative, to an uneducated person it seems like truth. My main reasoning to go through it was to find why they were so against the theory of evolution, well I found my answer, it's all because one guy back in the day said there can be no god with evolution. ONE GUY and bam. I still can't fathom why it is so hard to reconcile god and science together. And also for them to say "can't have something from nothing" is comically hypocritical and ironic, considering the belief that God just creates things out of thin air and injects them into the world at his whim and fancy, where as even the most rudimentary theories on the origin of life on earth revolve around chemistry and physics, as in life "came" from something. I believe there was a biologist back in the Renaissance that research ancient marine reptile fossils and said "of it wasn't for fossils, mankind who have no idea that there were multiple epochs that formed or planet and it's organism over time"

[@chasecharland1160]

@@hansdemos6510 ah no I don't think I missed it, I think I'm just not educated well enough to express myself effectively, cuz completely understand and agree with what your saying lol was exactly what I was trying to say haha

[@ContinueinFaithofGod24]

Seeing things like this can keep me obedient to god . It proves how complex and awesome God is . He litteraly leaves you in awe of his creation ! I love seeing videos just like this . Good work to all who helped create this great video!

[@mattjames4978]

Do your own research fella - don't be spoon-fed, this is important.

[@ContinueinFaithofGod24]

@@mattjames4978 No way spoon in the same way you went to either public or private schools spoon fed ?! Hahahaha that was the best comment I read ! As if you woke up one day grabbed a book and learned on your own . Guess what that book was written by another man in other words the whole world is spoon fed (Face palm!) . Watching videos like this means I am " Educating myself " Otherwise I'd go to school and be further indoctrinated by lies and false theories THEORIES!! than make zero sense ...

[@mattjames4978]

@@ContinueinFaithofGod24 As long as you’re looking at both sides of things without bias or wanting it to be true; you are more likely to get the truth.

[@ContinueinFaithofGod24]

@@mattjames4978 I've tried to believe the theories of evolution and none made sense . An IPhone has a creator and is complex . Same as with humans, they are created . It's clear . Why aren't human beings evolving in the to next creature or animal/mammal we are to become yet ? Considering we've been around millions of years already . And the process of evolution takes millions of years to show results, according to school or man made theology . I'd be a giant around 7 foot 450 lbs if natural selection were real, simply because I chose to evolve, I would evolve . In that case the theory of natural selection and evolution would be true , in that case . With creation , I was made exactly how I should be made , flaws and all , and I have plenty . But ignorance to eyesight and facts aren't one . I gave both sides a chance, god proved himself. I tried the theory of evolution but even Darwin himself wasn't sure of that theory at the end of it all . He had the theory of pangenesis wrong . How can you trust his 1800's theory ?

[@mattjames4978]

@@ContinueinFaithofGod24 Id love to talk to you about this properly but comments sections aren’t for that are they. You do seem to think there is “will” involved in evolution by natural selection, which is not the case. But anyway; Good luck with your beliefs… I hope they serve you well!

[@dinosaurdoggo6487]

I would like to ask, why then if all of the dinosaurs and other prehistoric animals died at around the same time in the flood, are these dinosaurs separated by different types of rock layers? You don't see any of the dinosaurs from Jurassic formations in Cretaceous formations or vice versa.

[@Gnarwolf]

But they didn’t all die around the same time , the Jurassic and Cretaceous periods were millions of years apart. The Mesozoic Era was lasted for 165 million years. In that time there were multiple extinctions. The main one your thinking of was the K-T mass extinction which destroyed almost all dinosaurs excluding crocodilians and turtles. The velociraptor and the T. rex existed nearly 10 million years apart , as an example.

[@dinosaurdoggo6487]

@@Gnarwolf I know that. However this video is saying otherwise, so I am questioning it's logic.

[@Gnarwolf]

@@dinosaurdoggo6487 ohh thats my bad dude, i misenterpreted your question.

[@dinosaurdoggo6487]

@@Gnarwolf no problem. I'm glad to clarify.

[@sadnigga9768]

why is god a racist against dinosaurs "yo noah save 2 of every animals....except those scaly ones, don't like them....don't know why i created them?"

[@JorgeGonzalez-pq7wh]

why is this not viral!? Awesome video

[@stevendelucas6311]

Because this video is fiction. Some minor research is all you need.

[@PrivateSi]

By definition all Creationist videos are pathological intellectual viruses.

[@genome616]

It aint viral because people like something that is at least believable even though it is fiction, the advancement of our undersanding of the universe is in a place where we no longer need fairy tales to try explain the observations we make, we have the technological ability to and understanding now where we can demonstrate many aspects of the bible to be simply wrong.

[@marketingsimplified]

@@PrivateSi I find it so curious that non creationists watch videos like this. Not that I mind I just don't get the motivation. It's all good though. One never knows where it will lead.

[@genome616]

@@sr71blackbird71 So not only ill educated but a homophobic who thinks making up or using the term gaytheist is how adults actual behave - 1 - you can't even spell the word correctly 2 - I in awe at your maturity 3 - Misdirection because you simply cannot rebut with a educated mature comment.

[@dmr6640]

Very interesting analysis.

[@flemishrepublic2016]

Wait so ALL of these different laters were made... by ONE giant flood? That's Like saying all religions were made up by the Same person...

[@thomasroath3457]

...I mean... they all feature Gods.. so there's that starting point

[@flemishrepublic2016]

Thomas Roath true, however Some of them have many different Gods, and not all religions have Gods, Some worship the sun or animals. But there would have to be a consistent layer of ancient sea fossils, which there is not. Also, ancient Life was not complex from the start... life on earth consisted of one-Celled organisms for hundreds of millions of years! Complexity does not prove creation.

[@rangerstedfast]

Layers happen all the time when soil is mixed up by water. I did that in a jar for a school science experiment.

[@flemishrepublic2016]

gg kees Two points are to be made here. First of all, Yess, layers get created by massive floods a lot and very easily, however this still does not disprove erosion, second, you cannot compare a small science experiment in school with a worldwide catastrophic event.

[@firegator6853]

what? all the fossils we find didnt become fossils the same time they are all from different eras and places...different natural disasters that cause good preservation of bones at different times and places

[@sdgloria9337]

This is so amazing, that I can´t stop waching these films! Never have my teachers at school explained science so logically that it made so much sense. The flood is indeed the event, which you have to acknowledge to be able to explain fossils logically, otherwise it is only an attempt to explain with lots of gaps and inconsistencie. Now is the time when God brings all these things to light. I pray that all the Christian scientists will no longer be suppressed and understand: God has given you a brilliant mind and gives you new inspirations to find out the truth. Do not hide your light under a bushel, no matter how you are attacked. Many of you are especially attacked because you are so brilliant at telling the truth that some people don't want to believe. But so it happened to everyone who was involved in a paradigm shift. Be courageous. We are proud of you!

[@naphtaliliverpool882]

I am a Geologist and this guy is talking a load of crap

[@halthammerzeit]

I'm not, but anyone with half brain knows it.

[@ブランドン死神]

Adding to that, as a Paleontology student, this was utterly sad to watch. What a waste of a degree if he actually thinks this way.

[@fourscore1964]

I am not a geologist, why is he talking a load of crap?

[@betci148]

@@fourscore1964 proper question, thanks

[@matthewdunn9134]

I was hoping this video was a take on the structure and design of animals to fully take advantage of environmental stimuli, not gods flood

[@gestt9283]

Oh Heavenly Father, thank you ! Using your airwaves to get the truth out through , Is Genesis History and burying the post modernism lie that this secular world tried cramming down our hearts In Jesus name, Amen

[@donaldmacdonald9940]

Tim Hallas ...My favourite instrument....i have an acoustic Yamaha the FG, only one of four of that model made by the company, to celebrate their 40th anniversary ...I like to sing the old gospel songs with it....are you an atheist ...well ...one of the songs I sing is “Here is love vast as the ocean, loving kindness as a flood, when the prince of life our ransom, shed for us his precious blood”.....I’m an old Christian now...i got my first guitar when i was about 14, I wish i had practised more, not as good as the person on your video.....regards....🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿....

[@annapaula3352]

Amen, I agree with you.

[@donaldmacdonald9940]

@@mangeygypsynunya6451 ...Aye nameless one. I had forgotten about that post....you will have to expand on the point of “it”....I’m not as bright as you.... ..kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z2qViGOYna-Be8k. She died aged 41,,,,You aren’t guaranteed tomorrow.....🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

[@flamingpieherman9822]

Satan is the father of the lie and still promotes all things in opposition to God.

[@AndréDeVos-y8f]

Yet another religious nutcase.

[@nosegrindv4951]

4th year university biology student here. oh boy is there a need for more creation science! this is so informative and carries formidable explanatory power. and yet christians in academics are still struggling to reconcile what their textbooks suggest with what their bibles say. please oh lord let there be a rennaisance of creation science to help us, and also benefit the rest of the world.

[@wasd____]

"yet christians in academics are still struggling to reconcile what their textbooks suggest with what their bibles say" ...Maybe because their Bibles aren't evidence-based and factual?

[@trackinggod8087]

I am really enjoying your series of videos. Keep up the good work!

[@kmaterne]

This dude is brilliant.

[@frankt7521]

I just said the same thing to myself. Brilliant.

[@erwingeorge6187]

The evidence is out there for everyone to find. Why would god create billions of stars and other planets if we are his only creations or did me create other people on these other planets too.

[@kmaterne]

Erwin George You’re assuming that there other planets. I think that’s huge leap, from what His word says. God didn’t say anything about creating other planets, during creation. The stars and moon were created to give light, like the sun. Only dimmer. That’s all He says about them during creation. Don’t let the ancient astronaut nonsense cloud your judgement. In Revelations, it says all the stars fell to Earth. How’s that possible if they’re thousands of times bigger?

[@i7Qp4rQ]

@@kmaterne Well, ther r other planets, go and watch Venus, its visible even with bare eyes. @Erwin George ; why did God made billions(^10s) of atoms? He could of made fewer...? This is in the series of childish questions...

[@olgaburgos7780]

World flood proven and It happened in thousand s of years not millions of years. Thank you, I have always believed because the Bible says so and gives the generations of our life in the world.

[@Martin-lc1sk]

Carefully omitting the vast timespan life has been around, and the vast quantity of life. We have only arrived as humans recently, there has not been time for extant life to mineralise

[@dinosaurdoggo6487]

I would also like to add how few dinosaurs we have discovered fossilized compared to how many millions if not billions that existed.

[@tristintaylor7999]

Oh look someone speaking logically instead of spouting God-talk like we're only 5000 years old as a species -_- sorry.........

[@josephjohnson6849]

God is real, earth is billions of years old, humans went through several major stages of evolution the end.

[@jacobely6826]

@@josephjohnson6849 You nearly got that all right! but jokes aside you cant exactly claim as fact that god is real lmao... not really a solid enough foundation of evidence for that one chief.

[@timgil7830]

@@josephjohnson6849 idk why some christians just can't seem to understand their faith is easily reconciled with science. . . Like very easily. Evolution and dinosaurs don't demand that God is not real.

[@umvhu]

The great plains buffalo extermination of the 19th century has left no fossil record at all.

[@freemind..]

umvhu - Right. There would be no fossils from that.

[@sandyo1063]

The birds and other predators ate them

[@johnbrinsmead3316]

why would it?

[@marketingsimplified]

@@hansdemos6510 I think the speaker, the paleontologist in the video explained quite well the way fossils are made. There has to be just the right circumstances or there are no fossils. Another point is there will be no 1 million AD because the Creator is coming back in a few short years.

[@marketingsimplified]

@@hansdemos6510 Actually it has nothing to do with track records or ominous years but understanding Bible prophecy. Granted you don't appreciate it's veracity and that's ok. You will SEE the last movements which are the 2 governments, the government of Satan and the government of God, reveal its character. One will reveal love, joy, peace...Galations 5:22,23 and the other enmity, strife, jealousy. One will reveal choice because of love (no true love without choice) & the other fear and force. It's up to every individual which one they are in agreement with. You may want to point out that those professed to choose God don't show love all the time or the atrocities of history in the name of God. However negative those thing are, & they really are, doesn't change that because God will have a people who will manifest those qualities (mentioned above) and will not have any of the other characteristics in them. They will demonstrate to the world that the character of God is Love. Many have much to learn about how Love is, how Love responds, how Love thinks. The world is about to see it.

[@craigallbee3284]

I believe in a young earth and the flood; but why have we not found human fossils like we find animals?

[@Nightshift10000]

Do they find Dinosaur fossils on the same layer as human fossils? No? Then what is the creationist reasoning for this?

[@mathiasthelander7834]

Reasoning? Creationists? No no no no, they don´t work like that.

[@rabidL3M0NS]

You cannot reason someone out of something they never reasoned themselves into in the first place.

[@jarredmillls5014]

Well according to the Bible humans should've technically been sharing the earth with dinosaurs at the time of the flood cause, its not long after the garden of eden that God floods the earth. So you're right there should be human fossils along with everything else.

[@ndeshihainana4915]

@@jarredmillls5014 where are the human fossils ?

[@ndeshihainana4915]

@@jarredmillls5014 or did humans strategically live far away from dinasaurs

[@kathryntate6809]

This was tremendous. Please keep on keeping on (:

[@redhedhik-chik2510]

Kathryn: I use the same phrase frequently (keep on keepin on). Love it!

[@timmeh006]

@Steve Doud Are you talking about the meteor hit? Because its very well established. You can see it in the geological formations from 64mja, there is clearly a line separating 2 layers. That line contains a lot of minerals that are rarely found on earth but are abundant in space rocks. About scientists not agreeing on things. When it comes to newly discovered things or new research/ studies then there is a lot of discussion. Which is normal, its not because someone concluded X that X is the truth. There might have been flaws in the research, bad conclussions etc. Thats what we call the "frontline" of science. There, nobody agrees on anything, science is very competitive afterall. But if you step away from the front line you'll see that the, older, research there is better founded, it has had more time to be thought about, evidence is more solid and more people agree etc. And that is where you need to look. Thats where the most reliable info is. The reason you may think scientists don't know anything is because modern journalists always want the "newest scoop", the most bling, the most impressive someting. Which is usually found at the frontlines. New studies can sometimes claim wild new things. But that doesnt mean they're right, which gives the public the impression that science doesnt know what they're talking about. I hope i cleared up some things for you.

[@DardS8Br]

@Steve Doud the overwhelming amount actually do agree on things. Otherwise science wouldn’t be science. Obviously there are disagreements where the scientific communities are split (good example is of the Tully monster, and whether or not it’s a vertebrate.) but they’re generally very niche subjects that aren’t well known.

[@TIznus]

I wish this accounted for the distinct layers exclusively containing creatures we define by : Triassic, Jurassic, Cretaceous... etc.

[@dongorth9102]

You know theist think The Flintstones is a documentary...They say dinos were on the ark....That ark thing REDICIOULUS...didnt happen..

[@TIznus]

@@dongorth9102 ... Don’t be so smug there Gorth... the belief system that the entire universe came into being spontaneously and for no better reason than to result in someone who lauds their own intellect yet who cant spell ... is a pretty ironic.

[@dongorth9102]

@@TIznus So you think that an invisable sky fairy tooted its magic whistle and created everything .What a joke...Lots of evidence for the natural no evidence for the fairytales...The bible gets the order of its creation fantasy wrong....

[@TIznus]

@@dongorth9102 I think the universe of infinite evolutionary possibilities resulting in you is a better joke.

[@DardS8Br]

@@TIznus either or fallacy right here. Just because we don’t have any idea of how the universe formed doesn’t prove the existence of a god.

[@sarahbell4344]

Any evidence of fossilised human bones in the flood record? The people that were living at the time of Noah ? Wonderful , God is so awesome 🙏🏻💕

[@erwingeorge6187]

Why do they even try to prove anything, when God did it.

[@KenJackson_US]

I wonder about that too. Though humans would be much better at fleeing and escaping to high ground or boats, so fossilized humans would be very rare. And if an archeologist found one who has faith in the geologic column, he would probably hide it.

[@KenJackson_US]

I never heard of him before, @Ganga Din, but Wikipedia says, "He proposed that the stars were distant suns surrounded by their own planets, and he raised the possibility that these planets might foster life of their own, a philosophical position known as cosmic pluralism." Sounds like your _"flat earth"_ information is wrong. Hope you didn't pay for it.

[@nicholasnews5983]

Maybe is because the flood was about human we were the sinners not animals

[@Sanjuro_Johnson]

They would be rare. Humans would have been the last to die. They would have run to high ground and clung to floating debris and eventually drowned or succumbed near the surface of the water and therefore not been buried. That's logical and consistent.

[@voiceofreason7558]

Can he show when the area was covered by water and is it the same everywhere on earth where marine fossils are found on land… or could it simply be tectonic plates rising and falling which changes which areas are above and below sea level?

[@Llanovanya85]

That was the first thing I noticed and immediately thought that this guy is deceiving himself. Ignoring tectonic drift and lack of any hypothesis of how such a massive world spanning flood reaching the highest mountains (as they include fossils) could happen and where all that water could come from and where it went, speaks for itself. He never investigated the claims of the bible as he takes it for granted and just looks at the frontier of science to find something where we currently do not have a solid explanation for and says "ahh, god". It's the god of the gaps all over again. Seeing design in eyes is also pathetic. Especially since humans are supposed to be the pinnacle of gods creation. Yet, we have the crappiest eyes compared to birds and other species. A clear sign for evolution at it's best. Well... lame. He's not a scientist at all.

[@vincemorgan9640]

@@Llanovanya85 Your eye argument is a little myopic I believe. Birds also have wings, but humans do not. Many certainly do have specialized optical abilities that humans do not. Many animals can run faster than any human can. Fish can swim better, and even insects are relatively much stronger. However. Humans can fly faster than birds. Humans can see distant objects in space. Humans build vehicles that enable them to travel many times faster than any animal can. No insect can build a nuclear bomb. Humans can even build vehicles that enable them to explore regions beyond this planet. This strongly suggests that humans are vastly more creative than any animal. Creativity allows humans to do so much more than any other living creature on earth, in all respects. But, they are not superior to the other creatures on the planet with respect to overall abilities? If they are, then they are by definition, certainly the pinnacle of life on earth. As for humans being the "pinnacle of gods creation", this is without context and thereby implies knowledge of the entirety of "creation". A bold statement indeed. A man was once asked why he was so sure that he was smarter than a monkey. He thought for a moment then replied with a question. "Who is in the cage, me or the monkey?"

[@joshuanorman2]

@jiminy crickets he's talking about planes you pillock lmao

[@jamescaulfield6632]

@@vincemorgan9640 and I would have replied doesn't matter we're still monkeys in the same way that a pug is related to a wolf we don't keep the pug in the cage I mean you can but usually we keep them at our side you wouldn't do that with a wolf bottom line is we're still monkeys just as much as a beagle is related to a wolf and yes they look different but they're still related just like we are isn't evolution amazing

[@ApplesAndOranges1]

@@jamescaulfield6632 wolves and pugs are still of the same kind. Where does a monkey become a human just like a fish becomes a dog? Lat time I checked, pugs, poodles and yes wolves are still of the dog kind just like nonkeys are of the monkey kind and humans are of the human kind. Isnt common sense amazing!

[@timcross2510]

Aren't modifications also called evolution? Also, the preservation of soft tissue is very rare.

[@SharonBalloch]

Natural selection can be defined as the process through which species adapt to their environment in order to survive. Natural selection occurs when traits that predispose organisms to survive in an environment are passed from parents to their offspring. ... As a result, the species will change over time

[@MaximilianonMars]

@@patldennis that's a nice 'just so' story you've written, is there any evidence of plants or animals changing kinds? Do we have any fossils of a cow becoming a whale? Is that single tooth that a whole fake animal was reconstructed from the evidence that satisfies you? I've got a handful of teeth here, maybe they belong to a Griffin, I'll sell them to you they come with a good story.

[@neildegrassetysonwithaknife]

@@MaximilianonMars the galapagos finches are one of the biggest examples of a species diverging into two. There's also the divergence of hominid species, which there is a good amount of evidence for in archeology

[@olivera6743]

@@MaximilianonMars yes? There’s actually plenty of examples, and not just from the fossil record. I recommend you google Podarcis sicula, or the study done by Krishna Veera on sticklebacks. Both are super interesting examples of evolution being actively observed and recorded. I hope they help you see this from a different perspective:)

[@kwh8c]

@@MaximilianonMars “a four-footed semi-aquatic mammal that thrived for some 40 million years was a common ancestor to both whales and hippos. ... The pig-like anthracotheres, which developed at least 37 distinct genera, died out less than 2.5 million years ago, leaving only one line: the hippopotamus”. Whales still have hip bones.

[@jebstuart1323]

Creationist just love to pick and choose. Pick what can help explain their narative, dismiss what can deny it.

[@1SuperMind]

Do you have any tangible contra-argument?

[@Nightshift10000]

That is so true

[@Niafi11]

There is Zero Proof of Evolution. Zero. I really hope you dont Go to Hell for accepting the Evolutionist Cult. Because 'They' Are lying to you. It was started by Masons, and Gnostics. So, being on 'Their' Side doesnt save you from the Anti-Christ. They will Swallow you up. And the whole time, you said, "I love you, I love you..." to the Dragon. For What? Being Right is more important to you than your Eternal Soul?

[@Niafi11]

Its time to Grow Up Jeb. Accept the Lord Jesus Christ, and Drink his Blood. Read and Follow the Word of God.

[@jebstuart1323]

@@Niafi11 Go climb into your Hollow Earth.

[@ben737D]

Every animal is designed to fit their niche in their ecosystem.

[@Gandoff2000]

So good to hear sensible theory that is different from what we were taught in science in public school. I had a love for science but when it seemed to conflict with what I believed from the bible it caused internal conflicts even into my adulthood. Thank you!

[@PrivateSi]

It's only sensible if you block out so much overwhelming evidence to the contrary your mind's caved in. Fundamentalism will be the death of Christianity as a major world religion.

[@sandyo1063]

Gandoff2000 I agree. Clearly it is OLD World thinking. Throw it all out.

[@gestt9283]

We are the lost generation from the 60’s and 70’s and there on . Post modernism took Our God our Savior from us . But now God is going to make things right brother. Amen

[@hailgiratinathetruegod7564]

If your belive doesn't agree with scientific facts, so much that you have to look up for absurd nonsense to bring them together. There is no wonder why christianty is dying in the western world

[@Gandoff2000]

@@hailgiratinathetruegod7564 Normal. People will grab what they want to believe and trash all other theories. Science is also effected by people's desire to believe something. for instance the belief that " there is No God". Science is not without biases.

[@georgeisaak5321]

Wonderful documentary ! Easy to comprehend and gave lots of answers for many questions !

[@neilwalker8686]

Wrong assumption + wrong interpretation = wrong conclusion.

[@1SuperMind]

This is modern science.

[@heitorpedrodegodoi5646]

@@1SuperMind Prove.

[@sunnyray7819]

Yes Sir, Mainstream has their timeline way off.

[@matthewstokes1608]

@@heitorpedrodegodoi5646?! 😂😂😂

[@matthewstokes1608]

Says the blinkered puritanical zealot

[@brianwinters2131]

Read Job about the behemouth and you will if you are honest it is a a small dinosaur.

[@gerrymoningkey5298]

Behemoth is most likely a Sauropod, interestingly one of the verses tells its nose being unreachable or cannot be damaged, which makes sense for something like a sauropod with an extremely long neck high in the air

[@gerrymoningkey5298]

the same verse also eliminates the possibility of Behemoth being an elephant.

[@user-wl8hw3nh9j]

The dinosaurs (a word introduced only in the 1800s before which we used dragon and serpent) probably took the curse of the serpent. If they are described as living creatures by ancient humans such as job and many others then they lived at the same time. Died in the flood, except for the ones that creep on their bellies and eat dust.

[@user-wl8hw3nh9j]

@Richard Fox what evidence?

[@andykeating791]

@@user-wl8hw3nh9j Google it. If you've got the rest of your life to go through the stockpile of evidence that prove it

[@rotationtheory33]

I literally had a dream about digging up fossils last night.

[@edwardjennings6021]

Same

[@Corfield81]

Not a flood of noah, this was result of meteor that wiped out the dinosaurs

[@crabb9966]

😂you guys always have to come in with the corrections ​@@Corfield81

[@jonathandewberry289]

Eh, yes, to be fossilized like that they were rapidly buried in massive amounts of mud.

[@nunyabisnass1141]

Sedimentary is a broad term for any loose mineral depositions that accumulated over time. We have fossils in sandstone and volcanic ash, both requiring and woukd teltale signatures of being mixed with water, if it were a flood event.

[@jonathandewberry289]

@@nunyabisnass1141 You just wanted to tell me that sedimentary, in the broadest sense, could mean dust collecting over time. Got it. That was one of the most worthless replies I've gotten yet. Zero. a nothing.

[@nunyabisnass1141]

@@jonathandewberry289 quite the opposite, i was offering some definitiin to your vaugely worded post in hopes that you could clarify it at least a tiny bit. Otherwise it reads like a terribley out of context statement.

[@stevendelucas6311]

Can you interview some mainstream experts please? The ones who look at evidence objectively.

[@1moderntalking1]

Dr Marcus Ross- wow thankyou !

[@proudarmedreadytobugaloode6295]

Just a reminder- lying is a sin so maybe you should stop.

[@MaximilianonMars]

You're a witness against yourself. For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all. For he that said, Do not commit adultery, said also, Do not kill. Now if thou commit no adultery, yet if thou kill, thou art become a transgressor of the law. James:2:10-11 KJV You are a transgressor of the law, just like me, just like everyone on this planet. A single lie is sufficient to send you to hell for eternity. You need the saviour: Jesus Christ. I already accepted His free gift of salvation, I will never come into condemnation (being sent to hell), you too could receive this free gift by placing your trust in Jesus to save you, instead of your own 'good works' which can never save you. On my channel I have one video, a clear gospel presentation. You can understand the gospel, believe it and be saved for eternity. It's a one time process, get saved today!

[@heitorpedrodegodoi5646]

@@MaximilianonMars Do you believe in the Greek creation myths? I don't, much less in your myths.

[@HMSJankoekepan]

Where's the human fossils from the same age as the dino's then? Oldest humanoid is from 7 Ma. This is BS.

[@ApplesAndOranges1]

Why dont you look it up yourself before you say anything?

[@B4SK3RV1LLE_]

Non-avian dinosaurs went extinct around 65 million years ago, pretty big time difference if you ask me.

[@HMSJankoekepan]

Very substantive response, maybe because you can't give it...?@@ApplesAndOranges1

[@jevonneely4383]

@@HMSJankoekepan well think about it, fossils are very rare, think about all the billions of lives that where lived by all organisms and compare that to the number of fossil found. They say that we’ll never know how many species and organisms there ever were because they never fossilized, but that doesn’t mean they were never here. If humans were around during the Dino age the population would have been very very small, and with such a small population you don’t have a lot of bodies to be fossilized, we literally don’t know how old humans are, the oldest fossil found of the human species dates back to 4.4 million years ago but it’s obvious that humans been around a lot longer than that, I remember when they said it was 3 million years, so the science isn’t settled on that They still find older then previous dinosaur fossils till this day and keep pushing back the existence of them. But tbh that’s just my theory on it, I’m not an expert on this, I’m just trying to learn day by day. If you really want to find out you’ll just have to do your on research on it instead of taking opinions from people like me lol, even scientist don’t take other scientist opinions without doing their own research. Just be sure to be open minded.

[@fabplays6559]

@@jevonneely4383 We can't use that as an excuse to assume something like humans existed alongside dinosaurs. That's like saying "dragons and unicorns existed alongside dinosaurs, they just weren't fossilised." We cannot make assumptions based on lack of evidence, we can only hypothesise based on the evidence we DO have.

[@angelocelani714]

I can’t believe ignorance is allowed to be presented as intelligence under the guise of implausible belief.

[@craig5477]

So science is finally applying logic & reason to the evidence instead of molding their theory to politics. It’s about time

[@1SuperMind]

Politics=Money=Cheating science

[@Crow-gg5se]

Just found you guys and really kinda like it, ya know.

[@TheMfrogg]

Also check out answers in genesis on KZbin.

[@TheKreesdo]

Hi! I am a believer of Jesus Christ and am so interested w your channel and all the hard evidence that is presented, which directs us toward creation and our creator. It’s amazing!! God is amazing!! One thing that I thought of while watching this video was when I was in high school my science teacher taught us that our wisdom teeth fall out because we are evolving and that cave men back in time needed these strong teeth to eat the tough/raw/hard food that they ate back then, but humans today don’t need our wisdom teeth so we are evolving and they fall out. Ultimately he said one day humans won’t have wisdom teeth at all. Something a long those lines. Can someone help me understand why wisdom teeth fall out and that it is not in fact a pointer towards evolution.

[@Thegamingdino133]

This is not hard evidence, not even close.

[@Gagasng]

Mannn their eye contact is intense

[@chasewilliams6887]

Wait is that....... THATS FUCKIN DISCOVERY PARK. I LOVE THAT PLACE! They're in the fossil floor, a little ways behind them is the marine fossil space them a floor up is the space for all the extinct mammals

[@alioman6896]

I know it’s amazing

[@rbylife9274]

Finally real history and something the world should focus on.

[@XaeeD]

One thing I notice off the bat, after having seen some of these videos, is the constant use of this word "paradigm". It's used to make it sound more important than it actually is. And it isn't even used very accurately. What's a "Genesis paradigm"? A paradigm usually refers to a model or pattern, but they're using it as the worldview we get from the Bible, while in that sense, it normally refers to the worldview attached to a scientific topic. And I don't think that the Bible is a scientific book. "Genesis paradigm" should just be called "creation narrative". I know, I'm nitpicking a bit, but I keep noticing them throwing this word around, and it really seems like they're doing it to make it sound more scientific than it actually is. The guy's explaining how rare it is for fossils to form, which is true, but in light of millions upon millions of years, with countless organisms living and dying throughout that time and on a global level, it isn't 'that' rare. There's a huge percentage of dead organisms that never became fossilized, and only a small percentage that did, and this still gives us abundant fossils, because of how much time and how many individuals and how many opportunities are involved in the grand scheme of things. If you think that the Earth is only 6000 years old, then sure; it's a problem. The problem here is that you're taking a snippet from a religious book, in which it talks about a global extinction event, and you're trying to retrofit observable reality and archaeological data into that story. You're using the story as an absolute truth, and the 'reading' of the external world is then bend and twisted to have it fit with said narrative. Now I know that for a Christian, the Bible has that status, but this is really what you're doing. Instead of letting the data speak for itself, you have to make it somehow comply with the narrative. I just now described the great flood of Noah as a global extinction event, but that's not accurate at all. Here's a major issue for you: the flood event does not represent the extinction of any species. What happens according to the story is that God destroys all living things, except those that boarded Noah's Ark. No animals went extinct. They were all still represented by at least two members of their species. These are all the animals that are extant today, with the exception of species that have since become extinct. Think of the Tasmanian tiger, or Steller's sea cow, etc. In fact, I don't think that the concept of extinction is found in the Bible at all, which is why Christians really had to get used to the very idea of species going extinct, because this very idea was met with a lot of opposition and dismissal by the Church, historically. Nowadays, we just accept it, because it's undeniable, but this hadn't always been the case, and the Christian world, not too long ago, completely rejected this blasphemous idea that species could vanish entirely. Why? Because the concept was alien to the Bible. Noah's flood story isn't about extinction. So that's something you have to consider when trying to explain the fossil record. The Ark, nomatter how big it was, could've never carried all the species of the world, even if they only numbered two per species. There are over 10.000 species of birds alone, today, never mind the countless extinct species of birds. There's no way for this to make any logical sense if you're going to have to include, not just all animals that are alive now, but also somehow include all species that are long-gone, like Dinosauria. There were no dinosaurs on the Ark, because they didn't exist anymore, by the time of Noah. If you're going to say that dinosaurs died in the flood, then why didn't Noah take two of each species of dinosaur along with him, as instructed? You cannot make sense of this, and you never will. There are far more reasonable ways to explain everything the speaker in the video is mentioning, and I suspect that he knows it; he knows why we find fossils of marine organisms on mountain tops. Plate tectonics aren't mentioned in the Bible, after all. In my opinion, this quickly devolves into a rather ridiculous attempt to have empirical data fit a short creation narrative of an old religious document. Any explanation that is now going to conflict with the narrative is discarded as lies and often times even called devilish. How do you even know that the Bible is 100% accurate? It's an assumption. The external world conflicts with much of its contents, the Bible is full of internal contradictions, there's a huge issue with how it has reached us and how it's been preserved, there's an issue with translating, reading and interpreting scripture, you have no originals, you don't know who wrote 90% of it, and you're now being confronted with the reality of the world; fossils, dinosaurs, extinction events, geological phenomena, deep-time: and you're struggling to have this external reality fit the "Genesis paradigm". I feel kinda sorry for you guys. I believe in God, but there's a clear conflict between what you believe is from God, and the actual created world around you.

[@mikedavids2602]

There was a pair of every kind, which would be closer to family in taxonomy than species

[@XaeeD]

@@mikedavids2602 I'm sorry, but what's your point?

[@sethhaun4440]

There are no millions, of years..this is a fallen" creation '! The world is being deceived .I'm not here to debate ..there is no debate .science is a?man made up word for knowledge?what the lost and deceived don't understand is spirits" GOD AND EVIL ENTITYS AS WELL are absolutely REAL.and we know nothing ..and are not incontrol ..you or man rather cannot read and interprete scripture ??without divine supernatural help?other wise your like I was for 45 years DECEIVED!!! Everything in this world the planet and time we live in is being manipulated by the evil one.it's a fallen creation .you cannot have true KNOWLEDGE UNLESS LED BY GOD HOLYSPIRIT AND HAVE BEEN BORN AGAIN.period what we think is important and or real ISNT, there's no way else to explain it bevause it's so far beyond are abilities' you have to have divine help.and once you have had this 3experience and help ..it only becomes terrifying ????and you then SYART TO " be shown truth.and every one even your loved ones will attack you.because you are seeing the world for what it really is FALLEN CREATION.with the majority of ALL PEOPLE even those who think they're smart walking around completly LOST.because we are brainwashed drugged numbed, down by all things .education governments food everything is a COMPLETE LIE.all diseases and issues are from SIN AND THIS FALLEN WORLD WE LIVE IN?every system is ran by MEN BUT THE MEN ARE SERVING THE EVIL ONE.none of this pryodyme, nonsense matters its all deception.lies.regardless of what definition its given it makes no diference again bevause from day one at birth your being lied to about everything ..you just don't see it or know it.when I was shown it put me in physical and mental shock.no drugs no dreams broad daylight sober ..no one's talking about the truth ..the evil one controls the narritive, and all governments .that's education and beyond ALL is LIES .control and slavery .people think bevause there lies to and have certain pleasures and or what they want that they know ..we are in big trouble and make no mistake THE BIBLE ISNT SOME STORY.there are several and alot is twisted and has been hidden from publics eyes ..again ALL is being kept and lies about.the only way for you to truly understand is to experience and see be shown and led by spirit?problem is you are I was to everyine is BUT BY EVIL who's only- goal and existence is to deceive .period it ddoesent have reasoning.or cares.people are not able to see this and are walking around lost it means posossed and or in most cases led by entity s spirits even believers are being deceived.I was one of them.no man can resist them without being bornagain in water and spirit threw jesus and the father holyspirit .you will never unde4stand until then.we are lost without it.it's so real I would love to sit down and explain but know you.this world isn't what your told and the people are being lied to.I'm not saying I know everything and there are none good.no not one none.we are guilty,just remeber or moxk' me or come up with what you think is rational.SPIRITS ARE REAL EVIL IS REAL AND DCEIVEING THE MANY ?if you want science or numbers cant give it.a educated guess woukd be easily.80 percent of all people even so called christains are being deceived.I uses to say exactly what you did .and used my own intilect and instinct to try to answer everything.until I found out the truth .sets you free but only from the lies of this fallen world.not from the physical and pain of it.Jesus did defeat death and so can you???there is a unseen world. Or relm' all around you.I have no reason to lie .I only want to warn you.to truly seek the real GOD NOT THE FALLEN ONE of this world.itsxlies scienCE is sorcery' how vain and foolish is a man to think he can catagorize" and reference a living GOD that created the universe all things and isn't flesh and bones like me and you.how dumb and foolish does a man need to be.these scientist s will never change anything the people in charge are OF THIS WORLD?serving evil.and will never give up there power or there life in this world.it's why everything is this way.debates are for the lost.that do not know the truth .it's pointless .the deception is to far along .intervetion is only way and will come as designed.seek the savoir my friend use your conscious seek him.thecteue god.and thise questions I know you have will start getting answers.I had them to..there will be no doughbt .Jesus is the only way to the father.heaven.don't be deceived.it's not worth it.waisted my whole life .like most .it's lies.love ya ..do real research from within .alone not online or woth lost men.I pray you swallow your pride ..man's its so incredable .but beware no one will be on your side .remember it's not the PERSON they don't know there not incontrol.and being led by spirits deitys' evil.they don't know.??the people will say your crazy and attack you.it's that real.

[@mikeleone4234]

If your interested, I would suggest looking up Sean McDowell and William Lane Craigs books “New evidence that demands a verdict.” And “Reasonable Faith” respectively. They both address A LOT of what you mentioned and answer them. They were hang ups for me when I first started studying Christianity. I’m an Engineering student and so, needless to say I had reason based issues at first. Have you checked out any types of apologetics? They helped me conclude believing in Christianity is a reasonable action given the evidence, but it was my faith that proves it to me. Best of luck man, I hope you find something compelling.

[@XaeeD]

@@mikeleone4234 I'm thoroughly convinced that Christianity is not for me. I'm a Muslim. My family on my mom's side have been Christians for centuries, and I grew up among Christians/atheists, and went to a Catholic school as a kid, so it's not like I don't know much about the religion. I have always been a Muslim, however, and that's not going to change. I think Islam is the perfect marriage of faith and reason. As it is said, faith without reason is mindless, and reason without faith is soulless. Thanks for the suggestions, though, I appreciate the kind invitation.

[@LonskiBig]

.....Just astounding.....

[@WadeWeigle]

Thank you for sharing this. I’m sharing this with others. God bless.

[@IsGenesisHistory]

Awesome, thank you for sharing!

[@steveparks2976]

So much evidence for creationism. 😊🙏

[@grandmakatemakes]

I absolutely believe Scripture to be true but I can't help but have 2 questions that linger after watching the full documentary and 3 of the extended interviews. What part do mud slides play? You're not going to have 40 days and nights of rain without mud slides. Why don't human fossils turn up on the fossil record? If all these creatures are being destroyed by a flood along with humans, there should be human fossils as well. Think about those mud slides. You can't outrun those.

[@Lorensic-Files]

There arent many human fossils because the more intelligent the creature, they would have kept trying to get to higher ground and moving. The smaller less mobile creatures would have been buried more quickly. Thats why there is so many of them. Everything else that drowned and not buried would have been eaten by the surviving fish. The Bible says he would destroy those that had the breathe of life in them. Of course tons of fish would still die from all the turbulent sediment in the flood waters but most would survive. Mudslides would have been going on also but probably more afterwards when the flood waters were receeding and drying up. When you look at many places on google earth, it looks like erosion from draining water on a massive scale.

[@evansilva3045]

The dude just said these things were buried in seconds, we lose humans to flash floods today

[@zenuno6936]

Humans would be in different ecosystems. And also there wouldnt be the abundance of them there are today.

[@eugenetswong]

It's a good question. In western Canada, I think that the longest stretch of nonstop rain that we had was 2-4 days, but the most consecutive days of rain was about 45-75 days. We didn't get any/many mudslides or injuries.

[@oddanielvives9066]

Fascinating information may the truth always prevail 🌍✌🏽

[@dreadassembly4087]

@@timhallas4275 I was an Atheist for 30 years if the evidence was pointing to Evolution I would still be an Atheist. I wasn't convinced of it then and I am not convinced now.

[@sebastianlarsson6053]

@@dreadassembly4087 what convinced you that creationism is right? There is a lot of evidence for evolution, but zero for creationism. Would love to have a discussion

[@lawrencesmith1985]

@@sebastianlarsson6053 only in the imagination is there evidence for evolution. Learn to know what the hell you’re talking about before you comment. You are oblivious to the reason why the evolution theory even exist!

[@sebastianlarsson6053]

@@lawrencesmith1985 how did you draw that conclusion? Would love to know how I am oblivious to how the theory of evolution came to fruition. I am a biology major, and saying evidence for evolution “is only in the mind” is incredibly interesting and ironic. What do you mean by that? Would love to have discussion

[@capedcrusader1489]

@@sebastianlarsson6053 he also means that evolution is mathematically impossible... biology is nothing compared to mathematics because it was the whole universe is penned with.... so having a biology major doesn't prove anything when you come face to face with mathematician....

[@manuelteixeira2496]

Telling about real events is easier than trying to tell a different story. The truth about fossils is that these fossils needed very particular conditions to be so abundant in certain layers.

[@raymond8920]

Find a single fossil with a t rex mixed in the same rock as a mammoth, a trilobite mixed with a wolf, a human with an ammonite. That would support genesis, but even animals as historically common as trilobites and ammonites, they are never found in the same sediment as a mammal, funny huh?

[@rangerstedfast]

I think there were some. A human footprint was found with a crushed trilobite under it, a human artifact in ancient coal layers, maybe more, I'll be back after I check more.

[@raymond8920]

@@rangerstedfast no it wasn't, it was a vaguely human foot shaped hole. A vague guess based on bias cannot ruin the entire scientific consensus. Maybe find a human skeleton with the stomach contents of any animal we know didnt live with humans, or vise versa, that would make a question. It's a case of how the genesis worldview if true we would have so much stuff supporting yet there is none

[@bradleyscarffpiano2921]

@@rangerstedfast it wasn’t actually a footprint, human bias for seeing patterns led people to think it was. It was no more a foot then that cloud is a face

[@rangerstedfast]

@@bradleyscarffpiano2921 And that's why we look at monkeys and see the pattern of similarity between us? Is evolution just human bias for seeing patterns?

[@veronikamajerova4564]

@@rangerstedfast No, that´s just similarity in our genes.

[@marketingsimplified]

I agree with the creation model. One thing I find curious is why don't we see fossilized foot tracks and human bodies in the fossil record.

[@johnw5584]

There is a set of tracks with dinosaurs and human foot prints together. Google it.

[@bridgetwilkins312]

Human footprints with dinosaurs footprints were found together in Glen Rose, TX. There is a museum there.

[@sathviksidd]

Because humans are a lot more intelligent and mobile, so they would go for the higher grounds and survive for as long a possible. Hence they're less likely to be fossilized

[@kmaterne]

You’d be shocked by what you find if you know where to look. I found a human finger bone, with a knuckle, beside a river. I’d venture to guess that those type of things are found frequently. But any kind of find that doesn’t agree with evolution, is buried. You won’t hear about it.

[@kimboylecaricatures6358]

@Ric Rovey what do you mean? Just curious? We weren't flesh?

[@saxnable]

Let's believe that for a second... If any of that was true, we should see human remains right next to the dinosaurs...

[@viniciusBWL]

Yes!

[@flightlesslord2688]

@@viniciusBWL we don't

[@BakkerSamuel]

Perhaps there were…….

[@saxnable]

@@BakkerSamuel There are none

[@sadiqsuleiman1480]

....that the flood never happened? From the logic of the evolutionists, the dominant species are the best adapted to survive. If you propose that the dominant species were the dinosaurs and "pre-historic" barely had the nature and skill to be the dominant species at that geological era, why are you asking for the fossil of man alongside the dinosaur? You cannot have it both ways. The real question would be what sort of event will cause the extinction of a dominant species consistent with the fossil records we are seeing?.....the mic is yours

[@101guitars-tm6]

Wow - God is clearly everywhere - far too complex and beautiful and perfect for random chance or any number of eons

[@carljones8334]

@@timhallas4275 Wow, you understand the complexity of a cell and every process going on inside it, you understand how the individual living cells combine to make a single sentient animal, you understand the complexity of a bee's dance, knowing it has no teacher? Could you sign my Bible as you are obviously God.

[@kmaterne]

Tim is special. He thinks that everything came from nothing. Which is a scientific impossibility. Tim also believes a theory that we evolved from other animals, even though there isn’t a SINGLE transitional fossil anywhere on planet Earth. Evolution is dead Tim. You’re hanging onto a theory that’s junk science. It doesn’t make any sense.

[@erwingeorge6187]

Yes God did it, but why is he so shy.

[@dreadassembly4087]

@@timhallas4275 I was an Atheist. I was full of hate. And it is clear that your hate won't accept any evidence for GOD no matter what it is.

[@dreadassembly4087]

@@timhallas4275 Do you really think by putting the state in the position of playing GOD and master has given positive results for justice? There is no justice for people in power. We expect them to hold themselves to a higher moral standard and we do nothing to insure that.

[@chimamondal1466]

Amazing Information. Thank you..

[@srinman]

I believe in all of this, have any human skeletons been found from the great flood?

[@dovecamp1845]

Of course there are human bones found ( look at Pompei discovery of people etc...) , but the focus here is the dinosaurs, Daugh ? most decent folk regard human skeletons and leave them to their sacred rest, now most bones of human type people of great stature and oddity are hidden in the Smithsonian Vaults or in Vatican Vaults... You just like arguments

[@kmaterne]

Tim Hallas Your problem rest with the academics that find the bones, Tim. There are thousands of newspaper articles of the discovery of large skeletons found all over the world. I’ve found a human finger bone on the bank of a river, close to my home. This evidence is buried, however, because it doesn’t jive with evolution. Funny how that works, huh Tim? The people that go and look for the evidence, are dishonest in what they find. If it doesn’t fit the stupidest theory ever conceived by humans, it’s tossed aside. That’s funny, huh Tim? People that believe in the fairytale, that everything came from nothing, are the same people that we trust to tell the truth. That’s the real problem.

[@grandmakatemakes]

@@dovecamp1845 the point is that there is no mention of humans in the fossil record at all. This isn't about whether it's appropriate to disturb the remains, it's about the unexplained absence of those remains. As I commented elsewhere, there would have been mudslides. Ever seen one? You don't outrun those. How has a deposit of humans not been found? Also, this isn't simply about dinosaurs. It's about proving Scripture true and evolution a lie. (YHVH be true and every man a liar.)

[@MrWholphin]

There aren’t any ape men either. Humans are by far the most intelligent creatures around so I presume most of them got to the highest ground and were fish/bird food when they drowned

[@rahowherox1177]

No, it takes longer than the 7000 year old earth and human history(as per bible claims) for fossils to form. IE no evidence of a global flood and certainly no evidence of humans in what morons claim is leftovers from Noah's flood.

[@b.a.macnab6209]

Well, here they go again proving that the Lord knew what he was doing without any help from us. Nothing be the blood of Jesus.

[@b.a.macnab6209]

@Paul Swift You have never heard of how God became flesh and went to the cross and shed his blood for those whom will be saved?

[@dolam]

We don't need God anymore because we have science. This guy proves it.

[@arturodiaz8092]

@@dolam you need good more than ever

[@dolam]

@Andree De haan That is not true. Science can teach us about morality and the emptiness can be filled with a knowledge of truth - not just believing things because they make us feel good.

[@10earthlytreasures84]

Thanks for all your work on God’s creations.

[@godzilla4082]

you might wanna take that back

[@brentdavila4383]

Is Genesis history? No. Do dinosaurs show evidence of design? No. Does confirmation bias cloud peoples' perception of objective reality? Yes.

[@1SuperMind]

The only explanation for the appearance of this comment is by random chance.

[@jeanninecathcart627]

Where are the fossils of Noah's peers; the thousands or millions of humans in the pre-flood environment? THAT's what I want to find.

[@cd8086]

They don’t exists because a flood never happened, quite clearly.

[@Justwrestle129]

So if the Flood destroyed Dinosaurs etc; Where are the Human Bones? Where are the Giants Bones?

[@GuerrillaSM]

Prior to the flood most pre flood humans probably lived in low lying areas where access to water and good climate was plentiful. As a result, those people would likely have been ripped to shreds by the early upheaval and the ones left were likely swept away by water in tsunamis etc. But even in some instances if humans lived in higher elevations, they would also live near a water source and likely ripped to shreds or swept away.

[@annetlocsin3802]

They were hidden away

[@jrhayes6901]

@@annetlocsin3802 Well that's convenient

[@aebhosor4835]

None, cos creationism isn't evidence of history

[@stevepennington2023]

What a great show.

[@sovo94]

Blatant misinformation.

[@natevoid9955]

Elaborate please

[@anonimo.4134]

Ah, yes ,speaking empty"Smart words" without any argument to prove your point.

[@Sassafras-]

Ur smurt

[@conceptvague5708]

@@natevoid9955 the way fossils are formed it’s evident that there was multiple extinction periods thus creating layers of fossils from said periods, not all fossils are found in the same layer thus disproving the idea of a biblical flood wiping out every single dinosaur religious people are so quick to reject science because evolution or the rising of tectonic plates because they can’t see it right away thus dismissing everything right away but then believe a book made not long ago about a magic wizard that can do whatever he wants

[@anonimo.4134]

@@conceptvague5708 i just kind of believe both in a way. I do agree there must be a creator behind ALL this ,because If you think about It ,it's Just too perfect. However ,even people need to adapt. I mean , would a loving creator not give their creation ways to adapt and survive?

[@whatitdo4203]

Ow, my brain

[@ms.muffin7592]

Short Answer: No

[@BJtheMountaineerguy]

Great video

[@lucycarl6301]

I love this series!

[@Tougenaut]

I dunno, i can see how a some reptiles, frogs and mamals glide. Something like a sugar glider could eventually become a bat like animal If the environment changed slowly to where they needed to be able to glide further as a forest becomes more sparse. the ones who could, due to a longer membrane glide further would survive and breed and so on until the need to flap to make the distance was necessary. Then those would survive and breed until eventually flapping produced enough lift to fly.

[@velocipastor676]

In other words, a perfect definition of evolution.

[@yuujinner5801]

While the evoloution of flight doesn't quite work like that, I can see where youre coming from. The chances of a sugar glider, or any gliding animal evolving flight is around the same as any small animal. Because gliding is such a specialized way of moving around in the air, it's not quite possible for it to switch to flight. Most animals that flew with membranous wings evolved from parachuting ancestors, which is not quite the same as gliding. The closest thing to a glider evolving flight would be microraptorines, but in their case it's more like a flyer evolving to glide.

[@blakeanderson4022]

I'm no prophet but... As a Christian I believe evolution was a part of Gods plan. I think that the similarities/parallels between the Bible and science are far more interesting than the never ending war of trying to disprove one another.

[@GathKingLeppbertI]

You aren't a prophet of God obviously. Evolution denies The Creator. Jesus Christ recognizes Adam and Noah, both of whom evolutionists deny. Learn the truth so you won't be tossed about by different teachings.

[@blakeanderson4022]

@@GathKingLeppbertIThanks for the reply. I don't deny Adam and Eve. I believe it is as the Bible say. Then evolution took over from there. I said I'm no profit because I don't want people to follow my words. They are simply the answers that put peace in my heart so I can continue getting to know God.

[@Umikojsjsjs]

Just think it bro its not logical that everything apear sudently out of nothing Respect bro 🙏🏽

[@mateokarlvonpavlovic8295]

@@GathKingLeppbertI Evolution never denies creator you Just dont understand that nature is a process and in Space you cant see that kind of nature. Ok I dont belive in that kind of Evolution to. But God bless you it seems that you love sloths they are cute. I love them to

[@eugenetswong]

Do you believe that God turned water into wine? If so, was the wine welled aged? If so, then how long did he take to do it? Would he have deceived you if you tasted good quality wine, and were not informed of the miraculous process?

[@BillionDollarBaby96]

That's great and everything, but why did Noah not get 2 of every dinosaur on the Ark?

[@BillionDollarBaby96]

Didn't really answer my question, Though I do agree that massive floods did happen, was it god, no I don't believe it was, I would say it was a superstitious peoples interpretation of natural occurrences. Something we see in every religious ideology around the world, they had no answers so they told stories of how the gods punished people for XYZ, and things "evolved" from there. As for the Quran having the Noah story within it's pages, that just highlights to me the commonality of their beliefs and the cultural differences that spurred their opposing interpretations of such stories.

[@BillionDollarBaby96]

@The Study Overlooking the side stepping currently occurring, don't answer a question with a question. Yes I have and I think it is something that shows how far we have come as a species while simultaneously reflecting our inane ability for self destruction. Now on your topic of Genesis CLEARLY describing surgical and genetic procedures, please do show me for I am intrigued at the thought that I may have finally met a theist that can actually prove that the bible is a factual account of events; and that people had equal if not greater knowledge of medical practice that we do now, because unless you have some new unseen page that was lost from Genesis, Adam having his rib ripped out and formed into Eve doesn't count.

[@naphtaliliverpool882]

the fossil record doesn't support a flood

[@1SuperMind]

You have to study more.

[@cd8086]

@@1SuperMind It doesn’t tho and neither does any geological evidence get your head out of the clouds a flood never happened

[@1SuperMind]

@@cd8086 There are many evidences of global flood.

[@cd8086]

@@1SuperMind Such as? Because the bible doesn’t count and neither the geological nor archaeological data suggests a flood happened. You’re going against thousands of credible scientists research, I’d rather trust them than you who hasn’t provided any support for his argument.

[@1SuperMind]

@@cd8086 You are researching only on arguments against the flood. But there are also many scientifically backed-up arguments which support the flood. And after all it all depends on which arguments we are going to believe, and continue our research based on such belief. Neither you neither me has strong enough arguments to claim the final conclusion.

[@thomasmartinscott]

"EVERY knee SHALL bow and EVERY tongue SHALL confess that Jesus Christ IS LORD!" Yes, that includes YOU, whoever you are! Don't believe me... just watch!

[@hhhhippo]

Why are they so close to each other lol

[@bluehydro88]

Well.... at least they acknowledged that fossils are real... now if we can just pin them down on how long it takes fossils and rock to form from sediment, well make some real progress. Baby steps I guess

[@jamesmorrissey674]

All these videos make so much sense.

[@brodyross4941]

Sarcasm?

[@Sojourning_]

all of creation is of Inteligent design. GOD.......................................

[@telmoprl1963]

What about fossils of humans from back in the flood do we find many?

[@kimboylecaricatures6358]

Interesting question! I would like to know that too. There should be human skeletal remains in the fossils, lots of them

[@sr71blackbird71]

Wouldn't this depend on the population pre-flood?

[@pigzcanfly444]

@@timhallas4275 sir have you actually verified the dates of the flood? If so you should run and report it right away so that they can attest to your amazing discovery and award you a Nobel prize. Otherwise your entire lecture was meaningless assertion that is not based on reasonable numbers and assumptions that you would never be able to prove either way. Great job playing the hyper skeptic with outliers and flawed logic though. Maybe one day it will dawn on you that the "naturalistic" explanations do not suffice for much anything at all.

[@kmaterne]

From what I’ve read, there were possibly, a couple of million people on the Earth, at the time of the flood. Do you understand what a violent event the flood was? It was so violent, that it tore entire sections of mountains off, and deposited them miles away. With that said, research giant skeletons found in old newspaper articles. There are thousands. That’s your pre flood people.

[@kmaterne]

Tim Hallas Dude, you’re clueless. First of all, there are flood myths from close to 200 different people groups from all over the world. Geneticists now can prove that the human population has a period that it almost went extinct. There’s a bottleneck at around 6000 years ago. We all came from 3 women, 6000 years ago. They’ve also shown that it’s impossible for the human race to be any older than 20k years old. The reason? I’m glad you asked. Because of the mutation rates of our DNA. DNA degrades over time. In other words, we’re getting less disease resistant, and dumber, as time goes by. That last part is VERY evident. We don’t get better over time, Tim. We get worse, with every succeeding generation. That’s proven. What you’re spouting up above, isn’t based on fact.

[@zoomies2]

Just realise that every time he deviates from what is accepted to be true by the majority of experts in their respective fields the chance that he is wrong increases significantly.

[@absbi0000]

Funny, that’s exactly what happened to Pythagoreas and Galileo

[@zoomies2]

@@absbi0000 absolutely when these people deviate from what is believed to be true the chances theyre wrong increase. Most only deviate on one thing, not everything like this guy also with the scientific method being applied in all these fields things have changed substancially since galileo at this point to dissagree on one thing is huge to dissagree on everthing means youre almost certianly wrong. Also what exactly did happen to galileo? He proposed a helio centric solar system, he was imprisoned for the rest of his life by the church for heresy. Also what happened to freud?

[@trojax44]

Are any of those Dino skulls actually real tho

[@danielweber3433]

Are you real, is that real air? Is anything real?

[@trojax44]

@@danielweber3433 is fake real?

[@trojax44]

@@danielweber3433 forgive me, I should have said genuine

[@danielweber3433]

@@trojax44 why shouldn't they be genuine? Nobody would profit from them big time. With all the effort and money it would cost to manufacture these and the according stuff it would be much easier to earn money in other fields.

[@trojax44]

@@danielweber3433 Why, because the powers want to constantly control the narrative of what people like you believe. Evilucion is not true, but you believe it is because of the lies.

[@artistikgaming2619]

ok but pretty sure evolution and nature would design something to be bests fit for the environment, right? i’m not an expert so i could be wrong but still-

[@valent1no763]

That is exactly right evolution is a method in which over vast amounts of time, an organism will develop certain needs for a certain environment and then if the organism fails to meet these needs the next generation will fill out these needs with natural selection. And slowly but surely life forms such as apes can evolve to use there more intelligent brains to solve problems and to use them for practical uses and with natural selection eventually they shall begin to develop tools culture and society and before you know it you have humanity!

[@artistikgaming2619]

@@valent1no763 that’s what I thought, so ofc dinos and stuff would show signs of design- cause evolution designed them, years and years of small changes led to dinosaurs being what they were

[@valent1no763]

@@artistikgaming2619 yes dinosaurs were a marvel of evolution and if you look through the fossil record you can see how they changed overtime until their untimely demise

[@zakuzeon7382]

I thank god everyday for creating dinosaurs to prove that he doesn't exist and religion is just a load of BS.

[@Rg-cf1ix]

Lol

[@steviemichelle7271]

I love me some Jesus, but there is no way this paleontologist is seriously trying to say that dinosaurs died in the flood in Genesis. This is saying that all of the modern animals that we have on earth right now walked in pairs together to get on the ark and the Tyrannosaurus rex‘s and velociraptors were running around not going onto the boat. No, just no

[@velociraptorblue]

Most animals on earth were killed by the flood because they were left outside the ark, yes. God specifically told Noah to bring "Two of every unclean animal, male and female, and 7 of every clean animal, several pairs of mates, onto the ark. So that means that while probably only two baby or juvenile T-rexs and velociraptors (small so that they could fit in the ark) and other dinos were brought onto the ark, all other adults and juveniles died in the flood. That's why we find all their remains. The two of each kind who were saved left the ark and started new life, but it's possible many starved due to the lack of food on the newly drained earth. But there are a few dinosaurs left alive today, descendants from those who left the ark. And if you don't believe me, first I suggest you read the king James or new king James version Bible account of the Genesis Flood since that translation isn't tainted, and second I suggest you look up articles and pictures of medieval art, the aggressive beast in the congo, and 1800s real pictures of men with pterosaurs they killed in the desert. I hope this explanation helped you.

[@richardcastaway7683]

The dinosaur being a genetic manipulation creature explains why it didn't make on the ark. Not a creature of the earth

[@velociraptorblue]

@@richardcastaway7683 then why are there fossilized dinosaur tracks in river beds in Texas?

[@richardcastaway7683]

@@velociraptorblue dryland was different before the flood

[@velociraptorblue]

@@richardcastaway7683 I don't understand

[@thebrunoserge]

Wait, how did a "flood" end up killing so many marine animals? LOL they lived at the bottom of the ocean, and your explanation for their death is... "flood"?

[@ครยฬร]

Easy. Rain water is freshwater but the marine environment is saltwater, and since marine animals can't live in freshwater environment therefore they dies. (Yes this is a joke, that's not how anything works at all)

[@joeyspijkers9867]

thằng nào thấy đươc cái của tao thì tao cho 1 lay, I'm so glad to read that was a joke, I was honestly worried for you before I read that hahaha

[@ครยฬร]

@ArmanAditya Basu you just described the permian extinction mate

[@robertpillowjr.1672]

"The flood" would have been catastrophic. Tilde waves and whatnot. That would wipe out quite a few animals in the oceans as well.

[@thebrunoserge]

@@robertpillowjr.1672 lol yeah sure buddy

[@darthdennis6681]

Funny how every dinosaur on exhibition in every museum aren't genuine bones and skeletons but plaster... EVERY SINGLE ONE!

[@avenator3295]

Except you're totally misrepresenting how fossils form. There's no way that a bone from 65 million years agp could survive to modern day. The bones simply get buried long enough for sediment to form around them and harden. Essentially, fossils are just rocks that formed around bones. That's why no bones are on display.

[@nuggetslayer75]

Yes the Bible says that the flood wiped out everything except for those on the arc. It’s all true

[@yosemitejam]

DNA seems to be a code that was “made” vs. randomly evolved, but DNA can adapt to its environment. This man seems to say God has his fingers in everything, instead of creating something and letting it play out like a wind-up toy.

[@KenJackson_US]

I think it's more accurate to acknowledge God made the designs of life perfect, little mutations fray and decay them.

[@yosemitejam]

Ken Jackson, I don’t know what “God” means, I wouldn’t be able to tell a higher consciousness being (a god) from actual God, it’s not like I can ask for ID.

[@1SuperMind]

@@yosemitejam God means an intelligent agent who brings complex things in an instant of time, which would otherwise, by random chance, appear after such an amount of trials and errors that human mind cannot even conceive.

[@1SuperMind]

This man does not say God has His fingers in everything, but certain things like the existence of complex organisms can only be explained by direct involment of God's intelligence, and not by random chance, or "wind-up and let it go", since even God knows what is the probability or chance for someting complex to develop in a short amount of time (we are talking about billions of years) without involment of higher intelligence which preexisted the evolutionary development.

[@dongorth9102]

Easy answer....NO...Nothing was designed in the natural world...

[@VincentMigwi-jy7oi]

Just like nothing is designed in the physical world

[@yavinklein-katz7719]

I’m still having a hard time making a connection to the biblical flood and fossil layers. Not sure there’s enough evidence or even the right evidence to make such a claim. I’m not against thinking outside the box when it comes to making connections between science and the Bible, but this would need some really good reasoning and not just a really really really vague explanation to why anyone would even make the connection between the biblical flood and these fossils.

[@Wayne--O]

Numerous floods = procession of the equinox. Yes, a larger one at some point. Also I question the span involved for transitional species, ie. having stable climate, food chain, atmosphere & habitat over millions and millions of years does not hold water to any current historical data. Throw in irreducible complexity, which applies to complex biological systems trying to change into something else.. it's just as large a leap of faith as any when looking at it objectively.

[@yavinklein-katz7719]

@@Wayne--O as I said I’m open to new ideas and theories but they need to make sense…

[@88mphDrBrown]

@@Wayne--O it is as large a leap of faith, mainly because it's a garbage YEC strawman. No good biologist has ever claimed that complex biological systems are "trying to change into something else".

[@porcu12345]

A really vague explanation is all the creationist people need. They'll take an inch and turn it into a mile.

[@88mphDrBrown]

@@porcu12345 They don't even have an inch, more like turning virtually nothing into a mile.

[@Joshua-dc1bs]

Fire-Breathing Parasaurolophus brought me here. Mega LOL.

[@shiver_kai1210]

Clicks on it: cool A few seconds later: oh no. Oh no..... no no no.....

[@Will-Parr]

Excellent presentation.

[@fantasticbeast9962]

According to creationists, driving fast causes accidents, so it’s therefore impossible to get anywhere driving fast.

[@1SuperMind]

It is possible to get into a box.

[@johnsmith-fz5pz]

according to evolutions we all evolved so why is it wrong to kill people?

[@fantasticbeast9962]

@@johnsmith-fz5pz what an odd question. Do you really think morality is contingent upon a god dictating the rules? Does the concept of empathy, mutual well-being and functional society make sense to you, or do you possess no empathy? Do you only follow rules laid out by your god because you’ll go to heaven? Why is it wrong to kill your fellow man, but not the case for other beings? Not a vegan or anything along those lines, but if you think it’s okay that we kill other animals, why the double standard? Why do think the fact that life evolved people carte blanche to run amok and everyone be okay with it.?

[@poilsopattes2929]

Genesis, biblical flood... LMAO when will you decide to leave the Middle Ages ? This guy is not paleontologist. He just has degree, but leaves the university with an extraordinnary tolerance threshold to cognitive dissonance.

[@connorengel1781]

Agreed gotta use what makes sense not what a book they have read to follow up on fossils and such

[@MaximilianonMars]

Right so the person who can barely form a sentence knows better than the scholar who goes against the status quo, goes against the majority of his colleagues to proclaim the truth. Everything he said was logical, plausible, in fact it's true. Bring a single argument against him. You can't, because you are a fraud with no knowledge of any value. You are regurgitating the same boring garbage we were force fed all through highschool, and like a good drone you never paused to question it. Fool! If you actually want knowledge, if you actually care about the truth, you WILL find THE TRUTH: As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one: For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; Romans:3:10,23 King James Version Everyone is a sinner, one sin is enough to send you to hell, however God loves us and provides a way to Heaven, through Jesus Christ. The Lord Jesus Christ paid the full price for your sin past, present and future. He offers the free gift of eternal life to anyone who puts their trust in him to save them, not in their own good deeds which can NEVER save them. I have a clear gospel presentation on my channel by a trustworthy pastor. Watch it, understand the gospel and believe it. Get saved today, it lasts for eternity. These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God. 1 John:5:13 King James Version

[@edwardjennings6021]

In my personal beliefs, god initially made earth, let it's flora and fauna evolve, and after each mass extinction repeats the process of creating life.

[@ApplesAndOranges1]

But you do believe in design and sustained care?

[@katkit4281]

Evolution: Organisms were not designed but adapted. Creation: Organisms were designed. Evolution: With 2 different ideas coming to the same conclusion we need to see what the evidence shows. Creation: Nah we will just assume design and creation are true without looking at all the evidence.

[@nunyabisnass1141]

Selective evidence that cant make accurate predictions. Mostnof creation science deals with criticising and offering alternative explanations to current modeling, but I've yet to see a single creatuonist predictuon that wasnt circular, or wasn't some type of inductive reasoning.

[@nunyabisnass1141]

@@katkit4281 huh? I know there are some spelling errors but i didnt think that should illicit a complete misreading.

[@aebhosor4835]

@@nunyabisnass1141 I think what he's trying to say is animals adapt based on what environment they are. For example, why did Polar Bears have thick fur coat? To survive on cold climates and without them, they'll probably die of coldness. And also as a very very religious kid, I don't think creationism isn't meant to be taken a literal interpretation. As it's not like a quick thing to happen, animals have to adapt for a long period of time. Thus evolution, which changed our understanding of how animals begam to have odd mutations into them. Without it, I don't know what the hell would we be thinking about

[@katkit4281]

@@nunyabisnass1141 That wasn't for you. Sorry a creationist left a comment saying there is no evidence for evolution.

[@katkit4281]

@@nunyabisnass1141 It looks like the comment is gone.

[@daveb1870]

So Id like to know about the wooly Monmouth, were they before the flood pr after but before the receding ice age? Ive not been able to find in the bible where it sheds light on "colder" areas. Were there colder areas pre flood? We tend to think that its somewhat close to how the earth is now but theres no biblical outline of, to say "the people from the north or south, the cold people". What was the population during the flood and is this why we dont see mass graves of the rest of humanity covered up and fossilized like we do with the animal kingdom? Were we just so few that when the flood happened and such a world event the bodies were eaten, ground up from massive debris? For the amount of skeletons they have suggesting they found the missing link, we have tens of thousands of fossils much more greater than even the populous of the earth in current day and they have yet to find missing links between them, suggesting that humanoid kind was very small, maybe a couple million? Very interesting series and I love it, every argument I've ever heard was the end all be all darwin, and "their" science simply cant explain it.

[@vomitonit6983]

The ice age happened before the Bible was written. And so the people that wrote it didn't know it was a thing

[@kostaspolychronidis3565]

Btw, watch "The Kent Hovind Theory" if you can manage to listen to those long seminars. He explains what U are questioning in his theory. Maybe it will help, who knows

[@meucantogames6952]

And why are not dinosaurs corpses eaten too? And what eat it? fish? The biggest dinosaurs are rare because their mass can only be sustained by a large area. The T-rex was so big it's estimated a single animal can need an area as large as the Manhattan Isle