Does 240 Hz actually give you an advantage?

[@Bitwit]

SORRY FOR THE SOFT FOCUS. IMA BAD PERSON

[@moots27]

its ok :), we luv u

[@Kaelygon]

Aren't we all.

[@cameronbeyer7687]

Bitwit can't believe you'd do this to us man

[@beanacomputer]

FYI "enemy lag" could be described as reaction time lol, but in the context of gaming, I think your term is actually better, to keep it parallel to the other types of lag we refer to.

[@fresh243]

you always fuck up every video you made , fans needs good content be conscious about it..

[@GokuSSJ811]

but the human eye can't see more than 8gb of cpu

[@ipockyjp4041]

i can't even see your future.

[@LilSOS]

Natsheh Gaming I disagree, we can't remember more than 1.6 GHz

[@NicholasWiewiora]

Well don't forget that cuda cores can only get to 7200RPM, so with that, your game can't even get to 4GB of GDDR5X CPU (which only outputs at 1.2Ghz anyways).

[@Neceroe]

i love how the first person didnt get the joke it made your continuation that much better

[@TheElmorenous]

Erogone he did get the joke

[@hououinkyouma6063]

Just play 30 hz for 1 month and go back to 60 hz, you will no longer need 240 hz

[@halops117]

Hououin Kyouma do not follow this advice

[@marksaidso]

This is the single most important piece of advice on this thread. #modernproblemscallformodernsolutions

[@Spikierzera]

30hz 240iq

[@restushlogic5794]

You are damn 👉

[@bm-jb6sq]

Well said. If you want to be grateful, experience from below. Not above

[@seinaruuvipakoputkisto1635]

If you dont have money to BUY this, just DOWNLOAD more MONEY

[@paoloh885]

Lyfe hacks

[@LbritoGT]

klapaucius

[@seinaruuvipakoputkisto1635]

Lol those likez

[@Kaie-k8g]

Sander en mää kään

[@godswiftemperico]

impulse_101

[@Jokakutihut1]

Just download more hz

[@pyrimad8]

Jokakutihuti do u have the link?

[@Joecool_123]

Worked for me thanks

[@KeyBrute]

Thanks og now i can turn off v-sync

[@fernandol4773]

Guys please seed.

[@bybl0s226]

People might actually take this seriously, please dont download hz. You cant

[@woodtvnetwork]

still waiting for 480hz 8k hdr ultra wide oled curved monitors

[@cream2257]

WOOD for under 300$

[@jeancarlosrosario6990]

Cream With G-Sync

[@xpodx]

They got 8k 60hz. So were getting closer ha but i agree yes. But amoled instead of oled. Cuz isnt there bleeding in oled?

[@pepega8319]

X pod X he was clearly joking

[@xpodx]

foochmeister why? You wouldnt want that?

[@void4900]

My wallet sees the difference that's why I still have 60hz monitor. Edit: i actually bought a 144hz 2k soon after this 🙃

[@LtSheppardXxL]

Void bruh I sprung for a 75hz monitor and even that small of a diff is a big diff. I got it and gamed for 3 weeks, then a line of pixels died and I had to send it in for repairs. I used my older monitor while it was gone and I felt drunk playing. Like my mouse felt choppy and not balanced. So I couldn’t imagine a 240hz to a 60hz play session, I’d rather not play at that point haha

[@Soshoyo]

@@LtSheppardXxL My first time playing over 40 FPS felt like i was drowning on land, It gave me a worse headache than being at a party you never wanted to go to.

[@18lucky17]

144hz for $300

[@fr0styyproductionsmc]

18lucky17 bro u can get 144hz way cheaper than that

[@SkulsterDulster]

@@18lucky17 im literally about to buy a 144hz today. And its about $180. 240hz are $300

[@jeffrockey86]

That is the exact reaction I had going from 60hz to 165hz. I thought I had just wasted my money... until I tried playing on the 60hz again. You can never go back. Lol

[@WindFireAllThatKindOfThing]

Truer words were never spoken. Same thing with screen size/resolution. I tried to go from a 30 inch display to a lower lag 23 inch display. I just couldn't do it, and felt like I had traveled back to the Stone Age. To be fair, both were 60hz, but I would take the 30 inch at 10ms over 23 inch at 3ms every time. It didn't effect my game. Going to the ASUS ROG 100hz 34", however, was like being visited by aliens who kindly shared their many miracles of Science with me.

[@BlessQs]

You're trying to tell me that initially you couldn't tell the difference between 60 and 165 hz? Get your eyes checked.

[@TheSearchForTruth88]

If you actually couldn't tell the difference between them when you first got the monitor, there is something wrong with your brain.

[@blyaticon8190]

Did you test 144 Hz? Because atm they are around 200€ and I consider buying one

[@blyaticon8190]

@@mike_qt already saving my money 😂😂

[@thefantorangster2491]

The human eye can only see one gb of mousepad

[@Luvums]

RX4000 that isn’t true the human eye can only see 1000 mb of keyboard

[@stevethea5250]

Wrong. The human eye can only see 24 karat of gaming chair

[@jensen777]

False. The human eye can only see 60fps of desk

[@shauryasharma190]

Guys please don't mess around human eye can only see 1 gb of Csgo

[@disctr4k69]

It's mouse carpet, get it right kid.

[@ohmygusperez]

"The one bottleneck of 240 Hz gaming is YOU." Very well said.

[@Someone-pu5eg]

He said that right when I read this comment.

[@ohmygusperez]

@@Sm00thieK You missed the point. The bottleneck is the person's skill when gaming; not the eyes.

[@JoelHernandez-tz3vk]

@@ohmygusperez What's the bigger bottleneck, the skill or the bank account?

[@TQT1995]

@@JoelHernandez-tz3vk both

[@errvega2705]

Still these clowns are claiming neoninja hacks

[@Peter-yc5kl]

I don't even need a 100 hz monitor because my reflexes are so shite

[@weedylock]

stick to card games :D

[@durianrain]

Don't play speed or spoons though

[@joemama069]

Obama the Llama Lmao 60Hz lol

[@auturgicflosculator2183]

Llama grabs matter.

[@jaybee0507]

I need 144hz g-sync monitor because my reflexes are so shite. 100hz does feel slower and i do worse in games like battlefield 1. Maybe if i were younger and healthier, i would be able to land shots even with 60hz monitor. Those days are behind.

[@ZachzyGames1]

Spinny mouse benchmark is my favourite benchmark

[@zCaptainz]

Can't they just use that to see where the limit of perceivable Hz refresh is? I mean, I see so many videos like this talking about how it's barely noticeable. I understand they are talking about in-game stuff, but... So many people say 240 is too much and even unnecessary. I guess the limit is not our perception ("you are the bottleneck" thing), coz I clearly see the mouse jumping every other millisecond. I don't want that. 1000Hz monitors please

[@ragazzoc.9392]

Just download gaming chair

[@stevethea5250]

MR POTATO just download a table.

[@pastamanity754]

@@stevethea5250 Just download a PC

[@stevethea5250]

@@pastamanity754 just download a monitor

[@Veshon]

Download ram

[@NOAH-dj1lm]

cl_ handsomeboi 1 you can’t download a chair.....

[@shahabazkhan1]

I'm watching a video at 60FPS on a 60Hz monitor, which shows a screen that has 300FPS on a 200Hz monitor.

[@expseeker]

watching the 1080p video on 4k monitor which is running 4k resolution.

[@yanceyboyz]

Don’t break the matrix 😂

[@FreziS]

I'm watching your comment with my eyes at 30fps on a 60Hz phone screen, which shows a screen that has 300 fps on a 240Hz monitor.

[@jcdenton5828]

Jesus Christ the lame ass comments have hit a new low.

[@imadeyoureadthis1500]

JC Denton I agree, And your one is the lamest.

[@FLASHitude]

I think your explanation of how we interpret 60 vs 240 hz irl was one of the best ways of explaining it that I've ever seen/heard. Very nice video my dude!!

[@Bitwit]

thanks! means a lot

[@inskiyNET]

agree with you

[@zZzSneak]

ITGFlashGaming kzbin.info/www/bejne/h2LGnpuQqJaDa5Y

[@justsharealittlepieceofmyl3000]

60 Hz or 240 Hz. Nothing expensive GOD CREATED HUMANS WITH 2 KIDNEYS NOT WITHOUT REASON GUYS, GO GET WHAT YOU WANT

[@shaqmac2136]

Uhm don’t know if you’re joking but we kinda need kidneys....

[@CaptainJunior]

Lol the 240 Hz. Monitor Is cheap

[@zabdn-o8f]

@@Aunos1 he has 5 kidneys maybe?

[@shaqmac2136]

aunos bill gates just sold his kids

[@obviousstar4041]

my dumbass was staring at the monitors trying to see the speed difference even tho my phone only has 30 or more likely 60 hz

[@seifenopa4706]

He recorded in 30fps anyway but you can still see the difference

[@strafy5230]

Seifenopa ??

[@ciao6340]

The human eye can only see 24fps anyways

[@madcauzebad]

The monitors are only getting about 60fps anyways.

[@jailbreakreports253]

TheNCGamer ?

[@ciri151]

This is probably where the ''you can't see above 30fps'' came from. Those people had a 30hz screen.

[@Gilbertnba]

The reason is simple, it's a bad use of a rule. The 30FPS, more or less, was a true statement, but some people took it like a general thing, when it was actually "true" in one situation : when you look at a fix scene, but not when you have a background moving, and certainly not when the background if moving and that things in this scene are moving too

[@stevethea5250]

How do I check Hertz

[@grimm8761]

@@stevethea5250 if I have a nvidia graphics card right click your wallpaper go to nvidia control panale and go to display setting or something like that and it will show your res and your hz of your monitor

[@wraithninja1131]

@@stevethea5250 right click then click display settings . Then click click advanced display settings and there read it should show the hz. if not click display adapter properties then monitor then read :)

[@swxqt6826]

Inigo ain’t gettin more right

[@LocksVid]

I spent all my money on this monitor, and I had none left for good gear, so I only get like 20fps

[@808spunjah]

Lux Legend oh man I’m so sorry 😢

[@mikeslade4322]

Oof !

[@olealgoritme6774]

Just download more ram to the stpdu gr4 3600. This will reduce your gpu latency and give u 45 extra fps.

[@seqtour4412]

Oof

[@java6231]

Lux Legend Don’t worry the human eye can only see half a frame per second

[@farsattack2687]

Where is the grandpa build ? Will he be playing on this monitor ? Totally not overkill

[@krisklaver3856]

Fars Attack take a reply

[@forasago]

A grandpa will need every competitive edge he can get.

[@SylvexDragonskin]

More Hz is an advantage as you can see. Seeing someone earlier, smoother, less or no input lag. However good you are you will become better by having that. We need that 4K 120-144hz OLED Ultrawide ;D

[@expseeker]

inputlag is very device dependent - for example most monitors have a 10ms delay. your 144hz refreshrate does not help here- since information needs 10ms - after that the first frame of the 144frames start.

[@panickyk2300]

@@expseeker lol thats the amount on tvs not monitors because no one uses a 10ms monitor to game unles ur playing terraria or other 2d games. A good gaming monitor should be 1080p 144Hz and around 1-3ms response time for a past paced first person shooter like Cs:Go

[@expseeker]

@@panickyk2300 you missinterprete black to white pixel time with inputdelay. Just google the term you will find out that best monitors have around 5-7ms. I am not talking about the 1-2ms "reactiontime" to switch pixel colors. Inputdelay must be measured most new reviews do so.

[@tonyapproves8148]

wait... but how can you see 240hz if there's only 700 people on the planet??

[@michaelposmyk1831]

Clorox Bleach you mean English teacher? Idiot. Go to jail and get your self a aducation...

[@LocksVid]

Tony Approves I thought it was 7000?

[@KingxRay]

that is not true, human eyes can reach above 5000 frame but in order to do that are really base on the person been trained or not, it is because we never trained, human then slowly adopt to the current environment. Have you ever wonder when you were a kid, you always felt the time past so slow? That is the proof of we human original are, seeing things in very high frame compare of what now that you grow up felt the day past so quickly. I once experience when I was kid having accident inside a bus, where I was terrified after I realize that it was a real accident not a dream. That accident was that I didn't had any injury because I was able to see what happen in super slow motion, the bus crashed into another bus in the front when on a highway at midnight. Till now I still remember the moment of seeing all windows very dark and every person on the bus slowly move the head towards the front and I also saw the front of the bus glasses slowly cracks, obviously I didn't know what happen but I quickly hold the handle in front of me and block my 4 years old little sister beside me with my hand because she is sleeping and brace then everything went back to normal and everyone fly towards the front. Obviously no death just people injured, my little sister got hit on the head a little bit but she was ok. For me that crash was like 5 mins long to happen but for every else they just felt like 1 sec.

[@qwertzuiop3206]

MyRectumSphincterCouldChopYourDickOff Bitch HAHAHAAH I LAUGHED SO HARD

[@clint6716]

@@KingxRay there are theories regarding why time passes quicker as you age and it has nothing to do with your eye sight.. humans don't see in "frames per second"..

[@carlosramirez-di9nj]

144hz in 3440x1440p sounds perfect

[@user-zu1ix3yq2w]

car ram I want 1440p or 4k, but I want IPS. And I can't stand 60hz. Heh, sucks.

[@mochageico]

I'll take an 8k 560hz IPS panel with %100 Adobe Rgb and it being ultrawide tell me when that happens

[@bone9jdjkaye]

you can't rlly get affordable 4k high refresh rate monitors.... infact they are very expensive, and high end hardware cannot power them

[@virtuaconker85]

what game would you play at 144fps at 1440p Ultrawide? nothing really AAA in the past year or 2 I can say that much.

[@muffenist]

3440x1440p 120hz is the sweet spot i think its hard for me to notice anything higher than that

[@brendanbutkus2392]

i recently switched to pc after playing at a competitive level on console for over 5 years... and within a month after getting my pc (about a week ago) i switched to a 144hz display with a 1ms response time... and the improvement in my gameplay is honestly surprising how much of an impact it has made to me as a player and how much better its effected gaming for me

[@daniel4012]

yeet

[@andrewskaterrr]

*clearly hasn't used a 60hz+ monitor

[@VikingPickles]

It's only $599.

[@zCaptainz]

He watched the video and thought "Wtf, looks exactly the same" lmao

[@Confelgi]

z Captain it's because it's a 60hz video

[@JonLake]

the link he put in video description. 240hz.. 599$ 100hz 1500$ am i missing something ?

[@EposVox]

The problem is it's not exactly an easy thing to just go out and try for yourself haha

[@laungmagawa8902]

"The one bottleneck of 240hz gaming is YOU" I disappoint my parents now I disappoint 240hz? *sad*

[@skipad4306]

gpu = pump cable = pipe monitor = muzle so cant run a 240L/h pump with a thin pipe and a even smaller muzle imagine firefighters using their big pumps but then use a garden pipe to put out the fire.

[@thehappyfellow5500]

Yeah, but you have to see him for your reflexes to kick in. The later you see your enemy the later you can react so 240hz is good even for slow reflexes MY DUDE !

[@DirtyPoul]

A bit late to the party, but better late than never, I guess. 5:45-6:19 This is false. It's not a bottleneck. The latency from the monitor is additive to your response time. If it takes 100 ms for the enemy to pop up, then it takes you 100 ms + your response time to shoot him. If that latency is halved to 50 ms, then suddenly, the combined latency is 50 ms + your response time. No matter what your level is, you will get a competitive advantage from using faster monitors. The advantage is greater from professionals, since the difference in % is larger than it is for us mere mortals. But we still get a reasonable advantage. Same thing happens going from 60 Hz V-SYNC to 60 Hz uncapped (since V-SYNC means the graphics card waits instead of delivering the newest possible image) and from 60 Hz uncapped to 120 Hz uncapped etc.

[@Type_Eos]

Yeah, I was like how the hell does that make sense? If I'm seeing the image sooner how does that not increase my reaction speed? lol.

[@danielisflying]

So how is he wrong?. You're saying tge same thing

[@DirtyPoul]

@@danielisflying A bottleneck implies that you cannot take advantage and that the combined response time doesn't change. That's false.

[@bg3841]

Unless returns to faster reaction speed increase at discrete intervals. Which they don't - but they could.

[@DirtyPoul]

@@bg3841 I'm not sure what you mean. I'm not a native speaker, so that may be why. Could you clarify and elaborate?

[@mykdoingthings]

I only have one rule. More hertz is always better, Ted. More hertz is always better.

[@ellypaws]

Not when the viewing angle requires you to look at the screen within 0.001°

[@gtab]

@@ellypaws you sit in front of a monitor, i dont understand all this viewing angle shit. It doesnt matter.

[@ellypaws]

@@gtab let me make that clearer, not when the viewing angle makes the colors look ugly even when you're sitting in front of it.

[@TheRealFrankWizza]

I assume it is only useful if your cpu/gpu combo can output 240 fps. Even the highest spec hardware can't on new titles. So you won't be able to see it unless you are running old titles like "CS GO"

[@obviousstar4041]

D Johnson the highest specs can... stupidly expensive but it can

[@wontonotnow2]

Not with everything maxed out, but if you're ok dropping AA a notch or two, or maybe dropping your resolution to 1080p that extra refresh rate can be worth it....well maybe not worth the extra cost, but at least get it to be smoother than you've ever seen a game go before.

[@TheRealFrankWizza]

Send me a benchmark of someone running witcher 3 at 240 fps. I am curious to see this.

[@weedylock]

anybody who has a a 240hz monitor already has a high end pc, this goes without saying, because those high refresh screens are not cheap after all especially with high res aswell.

[@stevennguyen3687]

D Johnson You're not going to want to be playing graphically intensive games at 240 hz. I would rather play Witcher 3 on a better quality monitor. Instead, you would probably use this on esport games which can be pushed to 240 with a high end pc.

[@SimplyKateLV]

ill save you some time. 100% yes

[@SlimeyCraft]

i can't even see 60Hz bcs PS4 can't barely play any game at above 30fps :) #ConsolePeasant

[@d7eemo270]

Alfando Yogatama it’s pretty sucks

[@tomekl3476]

„Any game” only the games that you dont NEED more than 30 fps. In rpg games 30 fps is just fine. But in fps games 60 fps is better than 30 fps. For example bf4 have 60 fps and still good graphics, bf1, bfh same. All cod’s same. Im not console fan because i play on pc anyway (just love mouse for fps games but i like more gamepad for raceing, sim, rpg (matter what rpg) and other games.) i just want to say that consoles are fine and you can enjoy gameplay without these 60 fps in games that dont need fast reaction time. On pc 30 fps is shit because pc is tearing and stutter mashine on looked 30fps but on the console its another story. 30fps feel sometimes more smooth than nonstable 60 fps on pc.

[@Manny444a]

Jay Skully Where did you get those facts? We don't see in fps and if we did it would be 800 or higher you're underestimating eyes they are better than just "30fps".

[@cozmics1191]

Jay Skully I can’t tell if I’m about to be on r/whoooosh or you are

[@MshSh-sl2rt]

iRuffy :D don't call him an idiot for playing on console you belittling douch

[@thefantorangster2491]

You cant see the difference in this video, because KZbin only supports 60 fps.

[@stevethea5250]

RX4000 🤯🤯

[@farsendingo7833]

HAZZARD motion blur

[@hemmed32]

@@farsendingo7833 it is a pretty good way to test respnsiveness if you cant see it yourself :)

[@Hexecutable]

Wow that cursor experiment you did was very effective. Thanks for this video. To the point and no bullshit clickbait.

[@emperorpig4837]

Kyle, I'm honored that you named the sexy monitor after my sexy self :)

[@Braydengabler]

PigWithAMustache lol

[@roodolf9879]

PigWithAMustache holy crap I read your comment the exact second he said pig

[@0s0sXD]

PigWithAMustache fucking pig

[@Kitan3000]

You're saying I don't have super fast reflexes? Unsubbed.

[@stefanozurich]

kyle didn't mention that you can, and or have to train your reflexes to get them to a high level.

[@mistermasculine5425]

I'm pretty sure this comment was a joke...

[@NissanSkylineRGTR-bq4xn]

PhantomIllusions it was

[@richardskinner2543]

Anyone else swirl their mouse around at 4:20? xD

[@GodSEndOMG]

Server Latency and isp is important too.

[@ellypsis603]

I can switch from 100 to 144Hz with my monitor, and i can't see the difference, but from 60 to 100, the difference is HUUUGGEEE, for me 100hz is the sweet spot

[@SaturnusDK]

That's probably due to your peripheral vision is able to detect motion up to about 90hz (11-13ms average) while your foveal vision isn't able to process visual information faster than about 55hz (18- 24ms average). That's also the reason why VR headset refresh rates aim at 90hz minimum to avoid motion sickness or other ill effects from prolonged exposure. Although, all new monitors probably do have some slight technological improvements that does make a small perceptible difference such improved motion blur suppression and display latency. Professional gamers and wannabes will probably say they can see a huge difference but it's probably psychosomatic if tested on the same monitor at different refresh rates. they feel like they should see a difference so they do. Do a double blind test. If you can't reliably tell which refresh rate the monitor is set at then you actually can't tell the difference. You should be able to tell at least 75-80% of the time or it's not a strong indicator beyond guessing.

[@klobiforpresident2254]

Samsonite Dove Can I just get a citation for the numbers?

[@gundolfscherenberg9354]

"human eyes can only see 24 hz, duh" HUMAN EYES DON'T WORK IN FPS

[@exeticgaming1636]

+Gundolf Scherenberg Even though it's a troll, fps and Hz are not the same thing ;)

[@klobiforpresident2254]

***** In this case, however, they are essentially equivalent. Why? Hertz is the unit for the inverse of time (so s^(-1)). It measures how often something happens per second. If our eyes "see" the world n times a second (so with n Hz) then we perceive a complete image, which may be referred to as frame, n times a second. FPS simply measures frames in Hertz. Therefore we would measure the eye's FPS value.

[@blakeprince3419]

This was very very well explained. The cursor behind the wall is the BEST explanation I've ever seen.

[@faxholm55]

Never left pornhub so fast

[@priultimus]

Faxholm Killarna. lol

[@discostoo]

Input lag on Pornhub is a pain.

[@suleman241]

discostoo fuck you, I thought I had a hair on my screen.

[@zCaptainz]

Epic profile pic... Damn! I actually thought "wtf is that hair", while reading +Glenn "I thought I had a hair on my screen." Hair pic inception

[@stevehodgson1420]

Faxholm Killarna. never heard of dual monitors?

[@bekeex]

I have a 144 and I can't play on 60 ever again.

[@eagleye44]

poor guy

[@Dr.WhetFarts]

i have 240 hz and 144 makes my eyes bleed now.

[@dawaeleader5771]

dr. whet farts dam how you get that much money lol spoiled brat

[@Dr.WhetFarts]

I have a 240 and I can't play on 144 ever again.

[@CheeseyChazHD]

@@Dr.WhetFarts really ? Damn..

[@bokehh2985]

I've always played everything in 4k at 60hz, and never even thought about sacrificing the resoloution for a higher refresh rate untill I bought a 1440p 165hz monitor, and man do I love it. It looks so good.

[@aleittiela8570]

Is it the dell 2417dg? I'm thinking about getting that soon

[@ВиталийКузнецов-э4ь]

This is not about sacrificing, this is about seamstress.

[@coinsagE46m3]

I'll stick with my 1440p 165hz G-Sync monitor. More than smooth enough for me :)

[@ripthorn3846]

coinsagE46m3 Damn you rich American!

[@janievcraftmovie]

Hey I have a question, if you turn the Gsync off and you play a game at 60-70 fps, does it then look worse than it would on a 60 hz monitor? I am asking this because i am looking to buy a 144 hz monitor but i am not willing to lay down an extra 200 $ for Gsync, and since a lot of my games run at around 60 fps i am a little worried that they might actually look worse on the 144 hz monitor (because of screen tearing etc...).

[@sheodgorath5907]

ty, i got the same question. the monitor i have a look at is the asus mg278q but i cant run freesinc (nvidia card) so i would just turn it off. But its to expensive to get a shittie picture for nor getting always 120-144fps. another thing i ask myself , sould i realy go for an ips display? i want the colours but i dont know the difference between 1ms-4ms everyone saies something different xD

[@bryand.5240]

I have both the Dell S2716DGR and the Alienware AW2518H, both are G-Sync monitors, However the Dell branded panel is 27" 1440p 165hz and the Alienware branded one is 24.5" 1080p 240hz Because the 240hz panel is smaller it is sharper than a 27" 1080p panel, overall I use the AW monitor most for gaming because it actually produces better colors than the 1440p panel Better colors and overall smoothness to me are more important than a marginal increase in pixel density

[@xPlatiinHD]

Same here ✌🏼 Dell 24“ 👌🏼

[@MeepMeep88]

4:22 LOL solution Mouse settings > Additional Mouse Options > Pointer Options > Checkmark Display Pointer Trails There ya go, now you have a 800hz monitor =D

[@paoloh885]

Thats not how it works

[@jidiplaygames1244]

r/woooosh

[@panickyk2300]

@@paoloh885 r/woooooosh

[@juliuskontos5272]

you worded this abnormally well. You deserve a sub

[@nicolasm5225]

All I want is a low ping.

[@thaDARKW0LF]

It's what comes before pong.

[@rotor13]

unless you get Fiber, not gonna happen.

[@nicolasm5225]

A Human ping is the latency between you and the server hosting whatever game you're playing. It's measured in milliseconds. You ever noticed that when you're playing a multiplayer game and it starts lagging and your inputs are delayed? That's because you have high ping. In some games it doesn't really matter, but in FPS games like Overwatch, high ping is extremely annoying and because of high ping you die a lot. My problem is weird, because most of the time it will stay at a nice 60 ping. But then, it suddenly jumps to 300-400 ping for a minute, then fall back to 60. I die a lot from this. Hopefully I answered your question.

[@MrTolokinho]

But human eyes can only see 60 Ping per second

[@mochageico]

llooll

[@EUK007]

An an FPS gamer, having a 2560x1440p 144hz @1ms is fantastic.

[@kirkland_Reid]

EUK007 question. in bf1 do you get screen tearing?

[@EUK007]

Screen tearing its very very seldom but screen stutter is more likely due to fps drop spikes. The fps drop is not the fault of the monitor nor your graphics card, blame EA/DICE for their buggy game.

[@kirkland_Reid]

EUK007 ok that's what I notice. I ran overwatch, division, and warframe and I had no trouble. thanks for the help. now I now it's an EA issue

[@EUK007]

If you get an fps drop spikes of 40fps or higher you will really feel the stutter and if I get 60fps drop or more while on a shootout, most probably i will die on that shooting engagements.

[@kirkland_Reid]

EUK007 I have a 1080 and when I disabled vsync I get screen tearing but when I enabled it I get low frame rate. I'm still new to pc so my kill death ratio is worst. I put the max fps to 120 and it seems to fix it. When I get home I'm gonna set it to 144 fps. in other games I leave the fps unlock and had no problem

[@coreyalpago3222]

Another important thing to consider is that not all displays are created equally. You can have two different 1440p / 100hz panels look and perform differently compared to each other despite having the same rates. Same for 60/120/240hz. It’s going to come down to the quality of the panel and how well it can display an image as well as how fast and clear it is. But like you say, the vast majority may only see a marginal difference between a comparison while the few may swing yay or nay either direction.

[@5BILLIONplus]

980ti SLI, still only 300fps... Did you forget to set the max fps to 0?

[@venettore3601]

It looks like it's being rendered on both monitors simultaneously.

[@5BILLIONplus]

Steven Aque It is, but still. CS:GO can get 400fps on my potato.

[@NitroDragon]

CSGO is a lot more CPU intesive than GPU, im sitting with a 1080ti and OC 7700k hitting 400-500fps constant, with a 970 i hit 375-450fps constant

[@hudanradifan]

Chris Lewis CS:GO is cpu bound game

[@5BILLIONplus]

So I'm wrong in saying csgo is a cpu bound game? No way. I'd never have guessed.

[@Marco-cl9pb]

I hope 144Hz monitors start guetting cheaper :/

[@mikehovel1383]

250$....

[@mochageico]

igualmente er i think it is same here

[@qiyuxuan9437]

TN panel 144hz monitor is pretty cheap now, the color is not great, but good enough for gaming.

[@sergystraystar9135]

Marco Martins 2018 in may I got mine for 197. 144Hz 1080 Acer

[@robshekelberg5315]

Marco Martins get a job you fucking peasant

[@majestic294]

damn bro my mom was chillin with me watchin this video and she understood everything you were explaining perfectley. You did a d@mn good job articulating that. Super good examples man.

[@RepsUp100]

144hz - 165hz is fine enough.

[@jonathanoxlade4252]

internet Aswel poor connection kills

[@panusilgrande2649]

indeed, 1440p ips 144hz is where its at, not sacrificing colors or visual fidelity but also getting that sweet fluidity... ...for 800$ ;_;

[@janievcraftmovie]

ehm i have seen a couple for 530 $ in europe :)

[@TheBcoolGuy]

RepsUp100 60Hz is all you need. I prefer 4K and good colours.

[@CaptainMemesteroid]

TheBcoolGuy if you're playing CS 60Hz is balls lmao, feels terrible

[@Shrobo]

It's funny how people were saying that 30 to 60 frames per second don't really matter because muh gameplay and now that consoles are finally catching up to 21st century. Meanwhile 144hz is basically a standard for pc gaming nowdays while pushing it upwards to 200+ hz monitors.

[@rayg8923]

SnapYoTestiezzz I highly doubt most people have 144hz monitors just saying.

[@trystanidog2059]

i would say the standard is 1080p 60hz...... but varies depending on the person

[@bone9jdjkaye]

I would say there is no standard.... sorry for the necro.

[@blee04524]

144hz standard? You got a rich daddy huh

[@MileRastovac]

trevor you cant play all the games at 144fps .. warhamer 2 total war for examle ..

[@bryanphillips6659]

Nicely done man. Great explanation and theory.

[@_TrueDesire_]

should atleast taken a 144hz and set to 120hz, or simply a 120hz monitor, THEN compare it to 240hz. i rarely see 100hz monitor, most are 60-75-90-120-144-240 and the odd gsync 165hz monitors. i went from 120hz to 144hz just because i wanted freesync (and there is pretty much no 120hz monitors out there) and that little jump wasnt noticeable, other than desktop mouse pointer was smoother :P

[@L3dtube]

i love how this is explained with the mouse lol

[@ultralooter]

Your explanation is so clean. Well done.

[@azsamsiizbrah]

When your monitor is 60 Hz and you can see the difference between moving a mouse on 60 and 240 Hz monitors :D

[@mochageico]

he slowed it down

[@casperd2100]

i think he's meming

[@fernandol4773]

monitor-ception.

[@felixbourdages253]

he's not xD you can really see the difference. when you go back from 144hz to 60 hz, you can see the mouse teleporting..it's quite annoying x')

[@nolanhanson5743]

@@mochageico I've looked at them not slowed down on my gaming laptop monitor and another one, you really can see it

[@CRYTRAX.]

Just Download 240hz POG?

[@ijaazahmed6399]

In about 3 hours im upgrading to pg258qr ! Great vid .. its my first gaming monitor comig from a 85-100 dollar monitor which hadnt even had a hdmi port

[@DAAEY]

What cable do you use to support 240 hz

[@4Paok4Eptalofos]

Display port only can support that refresh rate

[@DeasBro]

@@4Paok4Eptalofos no... hdmi can also check it but your gpu needs be able to do it, check alienware aw monitor

[@steelxx1779]

Imagine having a monitor that has 8k resolution and 244hz

[@danielwells1734]

Going from 60 to 144 was noticeable for me. Not so much on WoW, but on Warframe, the increased fluidity was quite obvious. Actions fired off quicker and accuracy got a boost too. Going from 144 to 240? No idea if I'd even notice.

[@KLKI_001]

When is the Scrapyard wars coming out on Linus's Channel???

[@DumbSloth87]

You're asking on the wrong place, go bother Edzel on twitter. @edzelyago

[@Distorteduke50duke50]

10hz MASTERRACE!

[@BankruptGreek]

DistorteDuke50 notebook gaming masterrace!

[@Distorteduke50duke50]

wheal deepns what you mean like a predator or like a hp??

[@BankruptGreek]

DistorteDuke50 I am talking about the 300-400$ ones, but just joking my rig costs 1k$

[@Distorteduke50duke50]

yeah i'm using a shit laptop right now but my builds gonna be done soon once i have all the parts

[@akshaysutar5672]

Really nice vdo. Pure info no bs to extend length of vdo🌹

[@bobpresla8001]

dude is doing reviews and keeps talkin about 100 hz. I thought everyone used 144hz

[@ShoaibxDofficial]

AW2518HF 240h 10800 g sync vs 2716dg 2k 144htz which is best>?????

[@1313CHORIZOMAN]

I have both and cant decide. When i want to get serious i use the 240hz when i want that eye candy i use the 2k monitor.

[@Taintedmind]

3:40 "Enemy Lag" is just Round-Trip Time (RTT) for the sender to give a signal, then receive it back from everyone else in the lobby; it's worse on non-dedicated servers, like on many older consoles and older console games

[@planarian1772]

244hz monitor really have a HUGE different *hides my 60hz monitor*

[@failgamer1yt941]

-Sent from my 240hz Monitor

[@mr.bagabitch1067]

Is it worth ? Not tryna watch the video 🤣

[@failgamer1yt941]

@@mr.bagabitch1067 it´s a very upgrade to your eyes if you play fps, if you have the money and TIME go for it :)

[@ThePetersalvia]

super helpful and clear description of the differences, thank you for this helps me decide to go with 240 hz display

[@canxtoria]

Yeah, you could buy one... but have you ever tried rice to upgrade your monitor?

[@geoffreyprill]

"go out and experience 240hz on your own for yourself" lemme just get right on tha- OH WAIT. I live in south mississippi where people only care about farmin and "my cousin cheated on me with my uncle cause he has a bigger tractor". the highest refresh rate we can go to the store and see is at best buy where i work, and its only 75hz. thankfully i snagged the last 144hz monitor we had in stock.

[@rotor13]

You never heard of Amazon or Newegg have you?

[@johndoe1220]

“my cousin cheated on me with my uncle cause he had a bigger tractor” Incest.....

[@jorgetesecum9065]

Great info!! it helped fill in a few gaps that ive been missing

[@jonahmann.]

I went from 60hz to 240 LOL. Got the free sync version of the Alienware 25 inch for just under 350!

[@mmhzrii1290]

Jonah Mann what’s graphic card are you using??

[@mmhzrii1290]

Iam planning to buy the alienware monitor too

[@jonahmann.]

mmhzrii At the moment I have a 1060 3gb. I plan to upgrade this year tho

[@bigmofo1122]

"Can you even see a 240hz display?" Stop asking that question. The point is to reach frame rate where you can't see the frames.

[@timball8174]

Big Mofo no you can’t see a 240hz display because it vibrates so frequently that it becomes invisible

[@jaipalveer]

So well explained. Subscribed.

[@googlehelpdesk]

7:24 he talks about a bell curve.

[@D_2_da_K87]

244hz monitors now available and I've just built a PC and moved to PC gaming from spending my life playing on console (I'm now 29) and I'm quite happy with my 75hz Monitor with my 1070 giving me a solid 75fps.

[@rebelwolf72]

D2daK87 Same here - 1070 & 75 hz at 1440p.So many ppl don't realize that refresh rates higher than your fps is useless.The key is to have a balanced system for your price point.

[@D_2_da_K87]

rebelwolf72 precisely I mean how the fuck are people supposed to even get a steady 244fps??

[@exeticgaming1636]

+D2daK89 240+fps is pretty easy to get steadily in cs.go and other light games. My machine gets an avg of 5-600fps in csgo depending on the map.

[@D_2_da_K87]

ExeticGaming oH yeah I know you can get massive high fps in esports but really 120hz is plenty for competitive gaming. The difference between between 120 and 244hz isn't as noticeable as 60hz to 120hz. If you have the cash then why not but you won't get 244fps with AAA games at higher settings.

[@exeticgaming1636]

You seem like you have tried both 120Hz and 240Hz? I personally use a 1440p 165Hz monitor, and that is definitely good enough for me. I have never personally seen a native 240Hz monitor, so I cannot tell you if they are better or not.

[@itsonlyyucky8277]

you explain it realy well in this video so that everyone should know why it is better to have a higer refreshrate on the monitor. Thumbs up :D

[@mycl2181]

This is the best representation of high refresh rate anyone has made on the internet

[@VladClaw]

Watch 3kliksphilip video on refresh rate

[@VentureNW]

I'm a bottleneck... just got to this video due to my slow refresh rate

[@PlanetXtreme]

Actual use for 240hz monitors is recording in 240hz, you can do slowmo 4x on youtube and still get 60fps. (Very useful for montages!)

[@programed8962]

Planet Xtreme you can record at 240fps without 240hz...

[@PlanetXtreme]

@@programed8962 yes, you can. But your recording software only picks up what is on your monitor, not what isn't processed. It cant read a frame that doesn't show up

[@pristineo]

I have 150 ms reaction time because I've been playing on a 10 year old tv. I love to play competitively but it's so fucking hard. Getting a 1 ms 144 Hz gsync this Christmas

[@dawaeleader5771]

PristineBean at least pay for it unless ur a spoiled pice of shit no offense

[@pristineo]

@ImNord I hope so ;)

[@Kami-ye9lx]

yeah pay for a christmas present or else you're spoiled.. shut your broke ass up..

[@Hex6326]

I bought myself a 1ms, 144hz Samsung 27inch curved display last week. The picture is great!

[@pristineo]

@@Hex6326 I have a 1 ms 60 hz and it feels good. I've seen a 144hz and it's transcendent

[@あなた以外の誰でもない]

Does 240 Hz actually give you an advantage? Conclusion: Buy one and test it yourself xDDD

[@ZonaDeluxeOficial]

AnTen OldWords :v

[@portugasanwa]

there´s no such improvement if u already have a 144hz display, it´s better but not like the gap bettween 144hz and 60hz, almost panels now suport 165hz, I think u dont need more than that!I have the nitro xf252q and the aoc 24g2u and there´s no such diference bettween them!

[@roofwall1749]

fantastic. you hit every topic perfect. thank you.

[@keytel1]

its like brake horsepower for fps and wheel horsepower for the monitor for the car guys

[@certaindeath7776]

In my experience, 98% of the people can profit way more from trying to play smarter in PvP Gaming, then from buying the most high end hardware... 100hz or 120/144 is perfectly fine.

[@forasago]

Obviously you can keep improving at a game with sub-optimal hardware, but you're at a consistent disadvantage and you're also bound to develop bad habits to compensate for this disadvantage. Example: Since you're at a disadvantage when it comes to reaction time you will learn to avoid those situations altogether and develop a gimmicky "asymmetrical" play-style like over-using off angles and peeker's advantage in a shooter. You're effectively playing a different game than most of your opponents. This limits you and will be a hard habit to shake once you finally do upgrade.

[@certaindeath7776]

@@forasago 100 or 144 hz is not considered suboptimal hardware, most people game with 60 hz. The improvment from 144 to 200+fps is way smaller then from 60 to 100

[@forasago]

@@certaindeath7776 nice going editing your post to remove the part where you said 60 Hz wasn't going to hold someone back.

[@certaindeath7776]

@@forasago lol. you should take care of your mind, it plays you tricks and let you see things which are not there. take care.

[@Yajitra]

Thank you. Well-illustrated with your own creativity.

[@ygalion]

100-144 is enough, well yes higher is better, it reduce blur effect, but with PC it its different compared with TVs, where picture on PC is already sharp

[@valid2539]

When playing csgo if u want to see your real fps do fps_limit 0 and it sets your fps max to unlimited!

[@timball8174]

FinesseWARE i think that’s not the problem he should be focusing on when he’s playing against bots and is spaying the ak without controlling for recoil and while moving ;)

[@dragon0361]

I tried this and my gpu caught on fire

[@luckysugar6954]

wont really help if your monitor's refresh rate is lower than your fps, it's like taking a big shit, your asshole is too small for it.

[@PaoloTrianni]

You can only see the effects of a higher frame rate. So when someone say you can't see higher than 30fps they might be right. Watch a video with 30 different pictures in a second and see if you can recall them all. Though be happy you can't as life would suck so much and the effects are better. Less blurred games that seem sharper because of those higher frames.

[@AliYassinToma]

i might go from 0hz to 240hz how about dat ? 😂

[@prestoncox2673]

audio only?

[@fakedemocracy]

been gaming on a 50 inch plasma for almost 7 years @ 1080p and it's been great but the plasma starting to show signs of dying so I picked up 144h 1440p gsynch ips with a nvidia 2080. while I'm not too impressed with the jump to 1440p, that framerate is breathtaking to behold. I don't know if I would sacrifice lowering settings to achieve higher framerate thou like 240. (my poor 8 year old I-5 intel cpu is getting mocked by my video card now)

[@thetranya3589]

Your CPU is bottleknecking your 2080. Time to upgrade.

[@fajardo9315]

fakedemocracy this is like a sad story

[@sliceofpay]

Great video!!!! Very informative

[@shiftmode999]

The human eye could only see 9 bananas.