Does the Bible Say Noah Brought DINOSAURS on the Ark?

[@avafury4584]

It's easy to believe in God when you have his Spirit living within you. God works in ways that go beyond the natural. What science cannot explain, God can.

[@MrLogo73]

Magic isn't an explanation.

[@notthisguyagain8557]

Preach!

[@notthisguyagain8557]

​@@MrLogo73 what magic are you referring to?

[@0i7PX72Nga]

​@notthisguyagain8557 He's referring to the magic where living cell is created by non living material

[@notthisguyagain8557]

@@0i7PX72Nga how do you know thats what he's referring to?

[@canthomaru]

This is the kind of discussion I needed in grade, middle, high school, then into community college.

[@notscythe]

No actual biologist would even feel the need to talk about this foolishness. It’s pretty much a flat earth conspiracy spin differently

[@mirandahotspring4019]

No, in school they only teach the facts, not ancient old myths.

[@notscythe]

@@mirandahotspring4019 yeah I am on your sude

[@tims5268]

There is a reason this nonsense isnt taught as fact in schools

[@jesussandoval8756]

@@tims5268please provide tangible proof that this is all nonsense.

[@Abidingingrace-p6z]

Amen AIG 🙏 Love you guys!

[@FighterzTv]

Recently stumbled upon your channel and been watching your videos and I’ve been hooked since. I’ve been so fascinated with the subject of Dinosaurs and the Bible, and with the Ancient peoples on how they dealt with them. What’s even more fascinating about this is that there is clear evidence of what the ancients witnessed, from different timelines , countries, from all the world! Even though I’ve been reading Christian articles on and off for over a year and a half, this stuff is all new information to me still, and that we’ve lied to our whole lives about the existence of Dinosaurs in school! God bless you man!

[@therick363]

If you’re going to accuse schools of lying then you need to back that up…..

[@broudie2]

@@therick363 they teach Innacurate things that even science proved wrong, such as (from my school at least) how dinosaurs probably had scales and all of that, when science says they probably didnt have much scales

[@therick363]

@@broudie2 when was the last time you were in a classroom? If something was shown to be wrong then it’s not right anymore….we understand science does that. We actually teach that’s a good thing about science-self correcting.

[@christtheonlyhope4578]

​@@therick363 self correcting......as long as it doesn't stray away from the main narrative

[@therick363]

@@christtheonlyhope4578 we do one of a few things 1-have an honest respectful adult conversation 2-misrepresent and be dishonest 3- walk away I offer you the opportunity to pick one before I respond

[@ClaireDelarmente]

Colossians 1:16 "For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him." / John 1:3John 1:3 "All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made." Genesis 1 1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. 2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. 3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.

[@willmo8238]

So when was the Flood?

[@alexi5598]

⁠​In The Bible it says that GOD tells the animals to re-populate the Earth. Therefore, Noah and the flood story wasn’t the first time that GOD destroyed the Earth. Science prove this because all the bird and fish fossils that have been found on land have DIFFERENT Dates in which they lived in. As time goes by, fossils sink more underground, and the soil that they are buried in, are different from each other. They have also found different kinds of humans in the soil. • Us: we date back to Adam and he was created ~6,000-4,000 years ago. Remember Noah his family were the only ones saved from the flood. • Neanderthals: lived during the Pleistocene Period; ~200,000 years ago • Homo Erectus: lived during the Pleistocene Period; ~2 million years ago • Australoputhecus Afarensis: oldest species of man; ~ about 3.5 million years ago.

[@lexiatel]

In Exodus, way after Adam and Eve

[@edcarson3113]

​@@lexiatelGenesis 6

[@tristantorres7511]

Can you site any sources that support y’alls claim about dinosaurs being on Noah’s ark and skeleton remains of both Dinosaurs and humans coexising?

[@truthisbeautiful7492]

Season 2! Yippee that looks great

[@IAMhassentyou-w5m]

If God has not spoken, His promises are replaced by our wishes. Think about some of the great promises of Scripture: I will never leave you nor forsake you (Heb. 13:5). Believe in the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved (Acts 16:31). My God will supply every need of yours according to his riches in glory (Phil. 4:19). Who said these things? If these words came from the mouth of God, if God said them, if they are indeed the Word of God to us, then they are promises on which we can depend. You can take them to the bank. You can build on them in every circumstance of your life. But if these are human words about God, then they are not promises on which we can depend but merely wishes arising from the heart of Paul or from Isaiah, that we might also cherish. If you believe that the Bible is our word about God rather than God’s word to us, you undermine the foundation of hope and replace God’s promises to us with our wishes about God.

[@jordnb449]

the antediluvian world was more advanced than we give them credit to to the extent on genetic manipulation, they were of much greater intellect and stature than anyone today.

[@velkyn1]

ROFL. nice set of complete lies, dear. No antediluvian world, and surprise how your ignorant bible has amazingly stupid things like you can change the color of goats by showing them patterned sticks. If they were so "advanced" they would have known how stupid that was.

[@TearDownThisWall]

Greater intellect than today's woke academic establishment-owned "professors", "scientists", and "experts"??

[@Bomtombadi1]

Cool story, bro. Evidence?

[@joeysplats3209]

@@Bomtombadi1 it's a logical assumption based on the fact our genetics weren't as messed up as they are now. What do you believe, and what evidence can you present us for that belief?

[@jesussandoval8756]

@@Bomtombadi1what’s your proof that all of this is fake?

[@truthisbeautiful7492]

Awesome!

[@Bomtombadi1]

Pathetic!

[@johnglad5]

Awesome

[@christtheonlyhope4578]

100%

[@colonalklink14]

Saving repentance is realizing that you are a sinner deserving of God's just punishment in Hell and turn (repent) from whatever you trusted in before, if indeed you trusted in anything; to trusting in the person and finished work of Christ alone for salvation 💕.

[@MrLogo73]

Sin is circular reasoning.

[@0i7PX72Nga]

​@@MrLogo73Explain your claim?

[@MrLogo73]

@@0i7PX72Nga Sin is defined as act against god. You have not demonstrated, that any god is real. So, you can't use that as an argument. You can not assert a god to prove a god. That's circular reasoning.

[@zerosteel0123]

​@@MrLogo73 sin isn't an "argument." It is the reality of the state of humanity. Missing the mark of God. We have plenty of "evidence" for God. Just because you don't accept it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

[@solipsist3949]

How about sparing us your colorful creed and keeping it on-topic?

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

These are the end times and the closer we get to Jesus returning, the more that the devil will come against God's word. We also know that there will be a great falling away in the church during this time. One thing that the Bible shows us is that God does not fully judge wickedness until it becomes utterly wicked. This world is headed towards utter wickedness and that means only one thing. God's judgement is near.

[@Columbo-r4z]

@@newcreationinchrist1423 I love it when Jehovah’s Witnesses tell me this on my doorstep and I point out all the things that are getting better in the world such as poverty and well being. 👍

[@1of4Thatsthescore]

​@@Columbo-r4zFaith is not about this world. Faith is about the world after this world. Your whole life is about choice. Each day, you choose either life or death through your actions. Remember, God does not send anyone to hell. People go there out of their own volition.

[@Columbo-r4z]

@@1of4Thatsthescore None of that applies to me then.

[@willmo8238]

What does this have to do with dinosaurs?

[@Columbo-r4z]

@@willmo8238 Ask yourself what dinosaurs have to do with the bible apart from indoctrinating kids into it.

[@zerosteel0123]

The Bible should be taken literally. There is a great assault upon God's word in these last days but we've known from the start that that is exactly what the devil does. It started in the garden of Eden and continues on to this day.

[@mirandahotspring4019]

Genesis is an old myth story, it isn't real!

[@zerosteel0123]

​@@mirandahotspring4019 and you're actually going to try to convince me of that? 😂 Come on.

[@mirandahotspring4019]

@@zerosteel0123 A day is a revolution of the earth as it orbits the sun. Yet in Genesis we have day 1, 2, and 3, before this god creates the sun on day 4. There are so many absurdities in Genesis it's pretty obvious it's a retelling of older myths.

[@zerosteel0123]

@@mirandahotspring4019 you'll have to do better than that. (AIG) We know today that all it takes to have a day-night cycle is a rotating earth and light coming from one direction. The Bible tells us clearly that God created light on the first day, as well as the earth. Thus we can deduce that the earth was already rotating in space relative to the light-source. God can, of course, create light without a secondary source. We are told that in the new heavens and earth there will be no need for sun or moon (Revelation 21:23). In Genesis, God even defines a day and a night in terms of light or its absence.

[@OlegLankin]

​@@mirandahotspring4019 did you say a day is Earth revolving around the sun? Isn't that a year? 🙄

[@BlueOxTrail]

Thanks for sharing this with us. So sad to read many hateful comments.

[@militarymarch3006]

Let them mock. Some learn the easy way, and some the hard way. Unfortunately, I guess they'll learn the hard way.

[@earthisasphere]

Sorry that you don't like that people call out liars... Noahs flood is geologically impossible. 1) The sodium carbonate needed for even a small single layer of limestone requires centuries or more of build up of shelled creatures and coral. When explaining the Grand Canyon, in your model, that isn't possible. In the actual model we know that the southwest U.S. was once a shallow seabed, so the sodium bicarbonate could build up over time. 2) The limestone in the G. C. also requires calm, shallow waters to form, like.... a shallow seabed. Not the most violent storm the earth would have ever seen. The hydraulic sorting claim YEC's like to peddle doesn't work either, because the water is still to deep and to volatile. 3) There are multiple places where layers of salt are separated by layers of rock. Sea's would have to evaporate, have a layer (or layers) of rock form, and then the area would have to become a sea bed again. A flood can't explain this. 4) Unconformities don't have the time needed to happen on a 6,000 year old earth. 5) The following were rulers of their respected kingdoms during the flood timelime Egypt- Pepi, Akkad - Sargon, Elam - Helu, and the Indus Valley Civ had been around for 1,000 years and continued for another 1,000 years 5) fossils and stratification layers of rock match predictions of evolution 6) Sand dunes don't have time to form 7) certain layers of rock would require forest fires to exists underwater 8) the amount of energy released during such an event would destroy the earth, also know as the heat problem 9) the mud problem 10) Ocean basins have less than a km of sedimentary rock on top, while the continental shelves are over 12 km think with sedimentary rock, a flood of that magnitude and length would have eroded away much more of the continental shelves 11) We have studied the growth rate of coral form a very long time now, and it doesn't grow fast enough to match your timeline - forget a flood, 6,000 years isn't even enough time. Look into the Eniwetok atoll if you want more info 12) evaporates and shales take too long to for. 13 ) I forgot an the drop in salinity levels in the ocean would kill most, if not all, the sea life. The rise in salinity in freshwater would do the same to those creatures. And that doesn't even begin to get into the logistical problems while on the ark (how do you preserve meat in those days for an entire years), and what the animals would eat once off the ark (did the carnivores just wait for all the other animals to have sex and give birth? Did the Herbivores wait for 8 people to reseed the earth?), etc.

[@therick363]

@@militarymarch3006not mocking-pointing out the blatant disrespect and dishonesty from this channel

[@mirandahotspring4019]

Don't confuse intelligent for hateful.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

Remember that they are, in reality, hating God. We are just the messengers. 🙂🙏✝️🕊️

[@zerosteel0123]

Appreciate your work, AIG 🙏 keep it up!

[@IAMhassentyou-w5m]

Amen AIG 🙏 we can always count on God's word to be true.

[@mirandahotspring4019]

Yeah, Zeus got it right! Or was that Horus? Vishnu maybe? There are just so many damn gods!

[@IAMhassentyou-w5m]

​@@mirandahotspring4019 only one God in Christianity. That is the triune God. Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

[@mirandahotspring4019]

@@IAMhassentyou-w5m Actually Yahweh started out as one of a pantheon of gods the early Israelites worshipped including El, Ba'al, Asherah, and others. Yahweh was a storm and war god. Over time Yahweh got conflated with El, a supreme god, and the others were gradually dropped.

[@mirandahotspring4019]

@@IAMhassentyou-w5m The triune god was pretty much decided at the Council of Nicea in 325 CE.

[@IAMhassentyou-w5m]

​@@mirandahotspring4019 The idea that Yahweh started out as an Edomite, Midianite, or Canaanite deity is a modern myth promoted by secular scholars. The starting point for these theorists is an anti-scholarly bias against the possibility that God is who the Bible says He is, namely, the one-and-only Creator, Author of life, Judge, and Savior of the world (Genesis 1:1; 18:25; Acts 3:15; John 3:16). Rather than acknowledge that God made man in God’s image (Genesis 1:26-27), they assume that man made God in man’s image. And when you begin with a premise that is an error, you’re guaranteed an invalid conclusion.

[@IAMhassentyou-w5m]

Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly, teaching and admonishing one another in all wisdom, singing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, with thankfulness in your hearts to God (Col. 3:16). Notice that God’s communication with us, which is normally referred to as the Word of God, is described here as the Word of Christ. That phrase is only used here and in one other place in the New Testament, but it reminds us of a very important truth. The whole Bible is one story and it is all about Jesus Christ. Jesus said to the Pharisees, “The Scriptures… bear witness about me” (Jn. 5:39). On the road to Emmaus, Jesus took two confused disciples through the Old Testament scriptures, showing them “in all the Scriptures, the things concerning Himself” (Luke 24:27). Jesus Christ is the central figure in the whole Bible, in both the Old and the New Testaments. In the Old Testament, He is hidden and anticipated. In the New Testament, He is revealed and enjoyed. The whole point of the Bible is that we should come to know and enjoy and love and serve and believe in and live for Jesus Christ the Son of God, who is the Savior, the Lord of all.

[@CreationvsEvolution]

God's word will always stand tall! Thanks AIG

[@kevinkelly2162]

Yep, tall tales indeed.

[@logicalatheist1065]

stand tall in the bottom of the sea. "god's word" is useless and pathetic

[@brunobastos5533]

Jews say the same , Jews say they the chosen ones and they do not recognize Jesus how you deal with this

[@CreationvsEvolution]

@@logicalatheist1065 not according to what we've seen

[@CreationvsEvolution]

@@kevinkelly2162 never said that

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

God bless you AIG 🙏🙏🙏 love this channel. Praying for you!

[@Bomtombadi1]

🤌👈💦 All over the crucifixion scene

[@inthelightofhisglory9614]

Stick close to the word, AIG, and we will stick with you too! Love this stuff.

[@poliincredible770]

Thanks for making science amazing again!

[@logicalatheist1065]

This isn't science

[@TearDownThisWall]

@@logicalatheist1065 It's real science, not woke establishment-narrative-driven science. See the difference?

[@keyjam9]

You like this "science " because you want it to be true. No reasonable thinking people buy his line of propaganda. He lies for money on KZbin.

[@Bomtombadi1]

This is pathetic

[@HS-zk5nn]

@@logicalatheist1065 yes, your self-reflection is accurate.

[@hallelujah969]

I remember as a young child playing with play doh or building things in the sand. When I was done playing, I would wad it up or destroy it, until the next time. I can IMAGINE that God ALMIGHTY might have done the same. 😊

[@christtheonlyhope4578]

I trust in God's word. We don't need secular theories to explain how God created anything and neither does God.

[@brianschmidt704]

Yes, but since God's Word is true, then it is scientific fact. Real bones and real fossils exist. The problem is the interpretation, not the facts.

[@therick363]

Prove god then you might have a point y

[@therick363]

@@brianschmidt704clarification-are you saying it’s a scientific fact god exists?

[@brianschmidt704]

@@therick363 No, science only deals with measurable facts that are observed and repeatable. This puts topics like God's existence or orgins of life and the universe beyond scientific study.

[@brianschmidt704]

@therick363 The existence of god can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. It is the best explanation for the existence of complex life within any imaginable time frame without intelligence

[@inthelightofhisglory9614]

God lets us know in Psalm 3 that he is there to protect us and shield us from the attacks of the wicked. It is always important to remember their end before considering becoming one of them. Psalm 3 Lord, how they have increased who trouble me! Many are they who rise up against me. 2 Many are they who say of me, "There is no help for him in God." Selah 3 But You, O Lord, are a shield for me, My glory and the One who lifts up my head. 4 I cried to the Lord with my voice, And He heard me from His holy hill. Selah 5 I lay down and slept; I awoke, for the Lord sustained me. 6 I will not be afraid of ten thousands of people Who have set themselves against me all around. 7 Arise, O Lord; Save me, O my God! For You have struck all my enemies on the cheekbone; You have broken the teeth of the ungodly. 8 Salvation belongs to the Lord. Your blessing is upon Your people

[@mikesiver1950]

There are, or were, footprints in Texas that clearly showed dinosaurs and humans existed at the same time (I think it’s called the Delk trail?). Some dinosaur footprints had human footprints inside them, and vice versa. Ian Juby did a great job at exploring these footprints. Sadly, someone took a sledgehammer to the footprints not long after they were discovered. They were around long enough though to be recorded and photographed and examined in detail, and they were determined to be quite authentic.

[@sciencerules2825]

You must mean the Alvis Delk know fraudulent "Flintstone" footprint. Delk took a track from an actual theropod dinosaur and carved what he thought would look like a human track on top of it. Sadly Delk knew nothing of human anatomy and his "foot" was anatomically impossible with a ridiculous "Fred Flintstone" shape and a cylindrical big toe. 😆 It was one of the easiest to spot creationist frauds ever.

[@mikesiver1950]

@@sciencerules2825 Incorrect. It was examined nine ways to Sunday and found to be authentic in every way. Ask yourself this question: If it was a fraud, why did someone smash it to bits a few days after its discovery was announced? No reason to do that if it was a hoax.

[@sciencerules2825]

@@mikesiver1950 It was an authentic creationist fraud. 😄 Where did you read it was "smashed to bits" a few days after its discovery? How was it "examined nine ways from Sunday" if it was immediately smashed to bits? 😆 You guys just can't keep your stories straight to save your hides. 😄

[@howardf5264]

Even Answers in Genesis considers these human foot prints to be of dubious origin. See their section on arguments creationists should not use.

[@mikesiver1950]

@@howardf5264 Not to belittle any opinion of AIG, but I prefer to rely on the evidence put forth by the scientists who actually did the studying. Also, I have to again point out that the tracks were vandalized and destroyed. If they were a hoax, why bother to destroy them?

[@sambopu1797]

Thank you so much for your defense of the Truth.

[@lomax117]

Something the experts don't talk about, and probably don't think about; the word "Dinosaur" is a combination of Greek words used by an English professor in 1841. Not when the Bible was written in Hebrew thousands of years ago. Would God save full grown adult animals? Or young juveniles that could procreate and repopulate the earth? In the book of Leviticus, God tells Moses what animals humans can eat and not eat. Including birds that walk on four legs! Which birds are those? In the book of Job, chapter 40, God talks to Job about the behemoth. He describes a sauropod dinosaur. In chapter 41, he describes the Leviathan. In modern day language, that would describe a "dinosucus". A 40 foot alligator!

[@burnttoast2790]

*Would God save full grown adult animals? Or young juveniles that could procreate and repopulate the earth?* The story likely meant adults of breeding age, but your literalist position waffles back and forth on adults versus children. *In the book of Leviticus, God tells Moses what animals humans can eat and not eat. Including birds that walk on four legs! Which birds are those?* That'd be the _bats._ Yup, if you treat the Mosaic strictures on eating flying fauna as dealing with "birds," then bats are birds. *In the book of Job, chapter 40, God talks to Job about the behemoth. He describes a sauropod dinosaur.* Behemoth was an elephant, and your only way to even _try_ giving a better match in a sauropod is an intentional misreading of the verse describing Behemoth's tail. *In chapter 41, he describes the Leviathan. In modern day language, that would describe a "dinosucus". A 40 foot alligator!* Well I'll be, a creationist smart enough to recognize Leviathan as a crocodilian. But no, you don't need to bring extinct species like _Deinosuchus_ or _Sarcosuchus_ into this. People were small enough on average back then that even a typical Nile crocodile would've been an enormous monster to them.

[@josephreigens3090]

AWESOME!!!

[@pandaman123213]

Love it! High production value, strong, biblical truth, very logical

[@IAMhassentyou-w5m]

In Christianity, the Bible is considered the "Word of God," and there is much to find about this topic in scripture. The Bible is called the Word of God, meaning it can be considered a direct line of communication from the Lord, divinely inspired by the authors of the respective books. Hebrews 4:12 - For the word of God is living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing to the division of soul and of spirit, of joints and of marrow, and discerning the thoughts and intentions of the heart. Matthew 4:4 - But he answered, “It is written, “‘Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of God.’” Psalm 119:105 - Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light to my path. John 1:1 - In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

Amen 🙏🙏🙏

[@brunobastos5533]

Jews say they are the chosen ones and that Jesus isn't what you think he is so who is right

[@fighterjetsteve]

​@brunobastos5533 Jews are the chosen people of God and God is clear about that. Jesus was a Jew, the Bible is clear about that. The Jews condemned Jesus to the cross. So you figure out who's wrong?

[@asonei3531]

so god directly condoned slavery and slaughtering people?

[@IAMhassentyou-w5m]

@@brunobastos5533 the ones who have received the Holy Spirit. That would be us.

[@evergreentree8042]

Rebuttal: 'A thousand years in your sight Are like a day that has just gone by, Or like a watch in the night' Psalm 90:4 NIV 'With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day.' 2 Peter 3:8b Is the Lord who brought all light into existence not also in command of time? Is He not able to make the events of billions of years occur in a single day? Is it not possible, that six days in the eyes of our omnipresent creator could be an eternity in the eyes of man?

[@JamesAwokeKnowing]

It is possible that god ran a simulation generatively to form the solar system etc based on exploding stars and gravity but the simulation ran in 6 literal 24 hr days.

[@peggypomerleau8448]

Thank you for this. I often teach my Sunday School students that dinosaurs were on the ark and that in the beginning, before sin, they ate plants.

[@sciencerules2825]

Why would you lie to innocent children about such long disproven nonsense?

[@earthisasphere]

What?! There is no evidence for either of those claims. There was no ark so they couldn't be on it, many dino's were meat eaters from as fat back as we have dino fossils.

[@alexi5598]

Well… I think that dinosaurs were here before Adam and Eve. In Genesis GOD tells the animals to re-populate the Earth.. There is no mention that an asteroid destroyed the Earth in which all of the descendants of Adam died. Therefore, Noah and the flood story wasn’t the first time HE destroyed the Earth. Remember, Noah and his family were the only ones saved from the flood. Adam was created ~5,500 to 4,000 years ago. Archaeologists have found other humans that have lived here before Adam whom were: Neanderthals: lived during the Pleistocene Period, ~200,000 years ago. Homo Erectus: lived during the Pleistocene Period, ~2 million years ago. Australoputhecus Afarensis: oldest species of man; ~3.5 million years ago. The Bible is documented after Adam and Eve which is why we follow it because it applies to US.

[@IAMhassentyou-e7l]

If human and dinosaur bones are ever found in the same layers, it would be a fascinating find to both creationists and evolutionists. Those who hold a biblical view of history wouldn’t be surprised but would consider several logical possibilities, such as human parties invading dinosaur lands for sport or for food, or merely humans and dinosaurs being washed up and buried together. Evolutionists, on the other hand, who believe the geologic layers represent millions of years of time, would have a real challenge. In the old-earth view, man isn’t supposed to be the same age as dinosaurs. Yet we can be sure that this finding would not overturn their starting assumptions-they would simply try to develop a hypothesis consistent with their preconceived view of history. ......AIG

[@sciencerules2825]

Now all AIG has to do is actually make such a remarkable find instead of just fantasizing about it.

[@Columbo-r4z]

@@IAMhassentyou-e7l A terrific example of projection. It’s not a starting assumption. It’s what we see in the fossil record. Ironically, Ken Ham recently said we don’t have to prove the bible is the word of god, it just is.

[@ralphreinert]

To be fair, if human and dinosaur bones were ever to be found in the same geologic layer, I expect most scientists (be they biologists, geologists, paleontologists, or other branches concerned with bones and/or fossils) would first most likely think that some sort of error had been made in excavation rather than that huge amounts of discoveries made in the past about two hundred years are all wrong. If no such errors could be found, THEN some scientist in a relevant field could become a new icon of science by proposing an explanation for the new discoveries. However, I (a non-scientist) have not heard of any such discovery. Other than what I find highly dubious KZbin videos.

[@stripedrajang3571]

Um, have you guys even heard of ancient Ica stones with drawings of dinosaurs, with and without people? Good luck going down that rabbit hole. 😅

[@Columbo-r4z]

@@stripedrajang3571 Yes of course. Carl Baugh ended up spending thousands of dollars for them until his guy in Peru admitted he’d paid local villagers to paint them for pennies. Yet another creationist hoax.

[@inthelightofhisglory9614]

Psalm 2 says.....Why do the nations rage, And the people plot a vain thing? 2 The kings of the earth set themselves, And the rulers take counsel together, Against the Lord and against His Anointed, saying, 3 "Let us break Their bonds in pieces And cast away Their cords from us." This is a prophetic Psalm amd shows us what is happening today. The world is united against God and his word but if we read further we see several things. #1 God is not intimidated by humans. In fact, he laughs at their efforts. He who sits in the heavens shall laugh; The Lord shall hold them in derision. 5 Then He shall speak to them in His wrath, And distress them in His deep displeasure: 6 "Yet I have set My King On My holy hill of Zion." It is futile to fight against God. You can't win.

[@willmo8238]

That you conflate this with belief in an old earth is ridiculous!

[@inthelightofhisglory9614]

@@willmo8238 the world rages against God and his word and part of that is denying what his word says.

[@willmo8238]

@@inthelightofhisglory9614 So what does God's word say about the date for this Flood. Adding up numbers on a genealogical chart is hardly a definitive way to know what God's word says.

[@inthelightofhisglory9614]

@@willmo8238 why not? Seems to me like you don't want to believe the Bible regardless of what it says. So why would I take your word for anything?

[@willmo8238]

@@inthelightofhisglory9614 Seems to me you are shoe horning a biblical interpretation into natural history....or pounding a square peg into a round hole. I do believe the Bible, but not the children's Sunday School version of the Bible.

[@kennybobby201]

Making a dead serious video about putting dinos on a boat is next level.

[@JeremiahKalani]

God/Jesus Christ made everything from the power of his word. Thank you Lord Jesus Christ.

[@saintmalaclypse3217]

Amen! Thank you Lord Jesus Christ for slavery and sex trafficking children and genocide and all the other Wonders your hand has wrought!

[@ТВ-22Олекс.Михайлович]

5:52 Yet the Bible does have words about "days". Peter himself wrote: "But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day." (2 Peter 3:8) Isn't it eye catching in the context of debates about "days"? Also, for example in Psalm 90:4, there is a point about similarity of a day, a thousand years (and a third analogy) for Jehovah. So as I see, days in the Genesis are more like steps, and they could even be in different sizes from one another

[@jeciel85]

Not evidence-based.

[@joeyyhc3883]

I agree, been thinking on this for a while

[@joeyyhc3883]

​@@jeciel85if the bible is all inspired scripture, then peters words have just as much evidence as Genesis 1 no?

[@IAMhassentyou-e7l]

.....God is the Author of scientific laws. However, He is also the Author of the Bible, His special revelation, in which He tells us He created the earth-in six days (Genesis 1; Exodus 20:11). Jesus Himself affirmed a young earth. We should trust God’s complete and inerrant Word instead of the fallible opinions of man. This doesn’t mean Christians are anti-science. Rather, when interpreting scientific evidence, a Christian’s starting point should be the Word of the One who created everything.... AIG

[@brunobastos5533]

Jesus Himself affirmed a young earth were in the scriptures is that

[@kurtdejgaard]

Quote: "This doesn’t mean Christians are anti-science. Rather, when interpreting scientific evidence, a Christian’s starting point should be the Word of the One who created everything". Comment: But that DOES mean that Christians are anti-science: For science is not about the result, but how you unbiassed draw your conclusions from scientific observations. Above quote denies science the right to unbiassed conclusions. And that is anti-science to the core.

[@IAMhassentyou-e7l]

@@kurtdejgaard unbiased...... that's funny

[@IAMhassentyou-e7l]

@@brunobastos5533 Amen 🙏

[@kurtdejgaard]

@@IAMhassentyou-e7l You know, there is a "funny" difference between having questions in search of answers, and "answers" that mustn't be questioned. The latter, is the very definition of anti-science.

[@SloNube]

This was a very insightful video

[@JuanDelaCruz-x2y]

Let me be the one to answer. NO, dinosaurs were never included in the ark....OK next!

[@billburkhalter411]

God knows what he is doing. Look out your window= No dinosaurs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! get over it and enjoy your "fossil fuels" which God knew we would need.

[@HS-zk5nn]

even after 200 years or so, no proof of common descent from a pond organism.

[@logicalatheist1065]

Evolution is an established scientific fact, you got left behind...

[@HS-zk5nn]

@@logicalatheist1065 insults dont make your case. try science.

[@SnowMonkeyCantSing]

Aww! We aren't all descended from pond mucus? Well, I'm still gonna rock to We are Family by Sister Sludge. 😂

[@logicalatheist1065]

@@HS-zk5nn that's not an insult... Get thicker skin if you're gonna attempt (and lose) to debate me

[@logicalatheist1065]

@@HS-zk5nn science supports my Position , it doesn't support intelligent design aka creationism

[@nomadicoasis9260]

excellent argument.

[@Jah_Babylon]

god made the earth with an apparent old age, a 6,000 year old creation that looks millions of years old, he created adam from the dust of the ground as an adult male,

[@mirandahotspring4019]

Nah, that's just a silly story in an old book.

[@0i7PX72Nga]

​@@mirandahotspring4019By using your reasoning, then evolution is also just a story based on old bones.

[@BiologosDebunked-h2v]

Amen. That's what the Bible shows us!

[@AlphaAchilles]

@@mirandahotspring4019 I guarantee you haven't read a single chapter in this "silly old book." Its always those speaking from ignorance that claim wisdom over it.

[@i7Qp4rQ]

What exactly looks millions of years old here?

[@ricoramos9864]

Very well done.

[@Bomtombadi1]

WTF are you smoking that you think this is well done?

[@BiologosDebunked-h2v]

Great video, AIG. I believe that they survived the flood. Too much evidence to say differently, in my opinion.

[@earthisasphere]

You want eviddence? Noahs flood is geologically impossible. 1) The sodium carbonate needed for even a small single layer of limestone requires centuries or more of build up of shelled creatures and coral. When explaining the Grand Canyon, in your model, that isn't possible. In the actual model we know that the southwest U.S. was once a shallow seabed, so the sodium bicarbonate could build up over time. 2) The limestone in the G. C. also requires calm, shallow waters to form, like.... a shallow seabed. Not the most violent storm the earth would have ever seen. The hydraulic sorting claim YEC's like to peddle doesn't work either, because the water is still to deep and to volatile. 3) There are multiple places where layers of salt are separated by layers of rock. Sea's would have to evaporate, have a layer (or layers) of rock form, and then the area would have to become a sea bed again. A flood can't explain this. 4) Unconformities don't have the time needed to happen on a 6,000 year old earth. 5) The following were rulers of their respected kingdoms during the flood timelime Egypt- Pepi, Akkad - Sargon, Elam - Helu, and the Indus Valley Civ had been around for 1,000 years and continued for another 1,000 years 5) fossils and stratification layers of rock match predictions of evolution 6) Sand dunes don't have time to form 7) certain layers of rock would require forest fires to exists underwater 8) the amount of energy released during such an event would destroy the earth, also know as the heat problem 9) the mud problem 10) Ocean basins have less than a km of sedimentary rock on top, while the continental shelves are over 12 km think with sedimentary rock, a flood of that magnitude and length would have eroded away much more of the continental shelves 11) We have studied the growth rate of coral form a very long time now, and it doesn't grow fast enough to match your timeline - forget a flood, 6,000 years isn't even enough time. Look into the Eniwetok atoll if you want more info 12) evaporates and shales take too long to for. 13 ) I forgot an the drop in salinity levels in the ocean would kill most, if not all, the sea life. The rise in salinity in freshwater would do the same to those creatures. And that doesn't even begin to get into the logistical problems while on the ark (how do you preserve meat in those days for an entire years), and what the animals would eat once off the ark (did the carnivores just wait for all the other animals to have sex and give birth? Did the Herbivores wait for 8 people to reseed the earth?), etc.

[@BiologosDebunked-h2v]

@@earthisasphere nonsense. First of all the Bible is very clear that the global flood actually occurred. Therefore, seeing as this is a question of history we will stick to the best history book. The biblical passages regarding the flood make it clear that it was global. Genesis 7:11 states that “all the springs of the great deep burst forth, and the floodgates of the heavens were opened.” Genesis 1:6-7 and 2:6 tell us that the pre-flood environment was much different from that which we experience today. Based on these and other biblical descriptions, it is reasonably speculated that at one time the earth was covered by some kind of water canopy. This canopy could have been a vapor canopy, or it might have consisted of rings, somewhat like Saturn’s ice rings. This, in combination with a layer of water underground, released upon the land (Genesis 2:6) would have resulted in a global flood.

[@BiologosDebunked-h2v]

The clearest verses that show the extent of the flood are Genesis 7:19-23. Regarding the waters, “They rose greatly on the earth, and all the high mountains under the entire heavens were covered. The waters rose and covered the mountains to a depth of more than twenty feet. Every living thing that moved on the earth perished-birds, livestock, wild animals, all the creatures that swarm over the earth, and all mankind. Everything on dry land that had the breath of life in its nostrils died. Every living thing on the face of the earth was wiped out; men and animals and the creatures that move along the ground and the birds of the air were wiped from the earth. Only Noah was left, and those with him in the ark.”

[@BiologosDebunked-h2v]

In the above passage, we not only find the word “all” being used repeatedly, but we also find “all the high mountains under the entire heavens were covered,” “the waters rose and covered the mountains to a depth of more than twenty feet,“ and “every living thing that moved on the earth perished.” These descriptions clearly describe a universal flood covering the whole earth. Also, if the flood was localized, why did God instruct Noah to build an ark instead of merely telling Noah to move and causing the animals to migrate? And why did He instruct Noah to build an ark large enough to house all of the different kinds of land animals found on the earth? If the flood was not global, there would have been no need for an ark.

[@BiologosDebunked-h2v]

Peter also describes the universality of the flood in 2 Peter 3:6-7, where he states, “By these waters also the world of that time was deluged and destroyed. By the same word the present heavens and earth are reserved for fire, being kept for the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men.” In these verses Peter compares the “universal” coming judgment to the flood of Noah’s time and states that the world that existed then was flooded with water. Further, many biblical writers accepted the historicity of the worldwide flood (Isaiah 54:9; 1 Peter 3:20; 2 Peter 2:5; Hebrews 11:7). Lastly, the Lord Jesus Christ believed in the universal flood and took it as the type of the coming destruction of the world when He returns (Matthew 24:37-39; Luke 17:26-27).

[@JesusSportsNature]

Thank you for the video!

[@inthelightofhisglory9614]

Sceptics of the Bible have existed for many centuries and atheism is nothing new. Even in King David's day, theh existed and be addresses them in Psalm 14. What is the best way to respond to them? #1 in the love of God but also with his truth #2 ignore their philosophies and vain arguments lest you become like they are. In Psalm 1 God shows us what to do. It's always important to remember their end before considering walking in their path. Blessed is the man Who walks not in the counsel of the ungodly, Nor stands in the path of sinners, Nor sits in the seat of the scornful; 2 But his delight is in the law of the Lord, And in His law he meditates day and night. 3 He shall be like a tree Planted by the rivers of water, That brings forth its fruit in its season, Whose leaf also shall not wither; And whatever he does shall prosper. 4 The ungodly are not so, But are like the chaff which the wind drives away. 5 Therefore the ungodly shall not stand in the judgment, Nor sinners in the congregation of the righteous. 6 For the Lord knows the way of the righteous, But the way of the ungodly shall perish.

[@Highphi420]

GOD would not be using a time measurement that had not been established because God had not created the mechanism determining a DAY. We are still in gods SEVENTH day.

[@estherruth4692]

What…? Could you elaborate a little? That didn’t make much sense.

[@GSpotter63]

What if by the time Noah built his ark a large number of dinosaur species had already gone extinct? That would have certainly lightened the load considerably.

[@keyjam9]

@@GSpotter63 haha yes that is very true. All the dinosaurs were extinct except the birds. Cretacious dinosaurs were extinct 66 million years ago. You are correct.

[@velkyn1]

aka we have to make up nonsense to try to excuse the other nonsense in our cult's book.

[@GSpotter63]

@@keyjam9 According to bias science... Based on unproven assumptions... In fact quite often against the available evidence. The very presence of collagen in fossilized dinosaur bone is evidence that they couldn't possibly be millions of years old... But you just go on ahead and continue ignoring this theory killing evidence.

[@GSpotter63]

@@velkyn1 Well at least I go where the evidence leads....

[@earthisasphere]

@@GSpotter63 Noahs flood is geologically impossible. 1) The sodium carbonate needed for even a small single layer of limestone requires centuries or more of build up of shelled creatures and coral. When explaining the Grand Canyon, in your model, that isn't possible. In the actual model we know that the southwest U.S. was once a shallow seabed, so the sodium bicarbonate could build up over time. 2) The limestone in the G. C. also requires calm, shallow waters to form, like.... a shallow seabed. Not the most violent storm the earth would have ever seen. The hydraulic sorting claim YEC's like to peddle doesn't work either, because the water is still to deep and to volatile. 3) There are multiple places where layers of salt are separated by layers of rock. Sea's would have to evaporate, have a layer (or layers) of rock form, and then the area would have to become a sea bed again. A flood can't explain this. 4) Unconformities don't have the time needed to happen on a 6,000 year old earth. 5) The following were rulers of their respected kingdoms during the flood timelime Egypt- Pepi, Akkad - Sargon, Elam - Helu, and the Indus Valley Civ had been around for 1,000 years and continued for another 1,000 years 5) fossils and stratification layers of rock match predictions of evolution 6) Sand dunes don't have time to form 7) certain layers of rock would require forest fires to exists underwater 8) the amount of energy released during such an event would destroy the earth, also know as the heat problem 9) the mud problem 10) Ocean basins have less than a km of sedimentary rock on top, while the continental shelves are over 12 km think with sedimentary rock, a flood of that magnitude and length would have eroded away much more of the continental shelves 11) We have studied the growth rate of coral form a very long time now, and it doesn't grow fast enough to match your timeline - forget a flood, 6,000 years isn't even enough time. Look into the Eniwetok atoll if you want more info 12) evaporates and shales take too long to for. 13 ) I forgot an the drop in salinity levels in the ocean would kill most, if not all, the sea life. The rise in salinity in freshwater would do the same to those creatures. And that doesn't even begin to get into the logistical problems while on the ark (how do you preserve meat in those days for an entire years), and what the animals would eat once off the ark (did the carnivores just wait for all the other animals to have sex and give birth? Did the Herbivores wait for 8 people to reseed the earth?), etc.

[@brianrhoads86]

Amen!

[@Discipo]

Hello, you make great videos, I would be interested to hear from you about "E. coli long-term evolution experiment"

[@Discipo]

And specifically about the so-called "evolved bacteria" of Richard Lenski

[@HS-zk5nn]

@@Discipo not very difficult: the ecoli remained ecoli.

[@hansdemos6510]

You said: _"I would be interested to hear from you about "E. coli long-term evolution experiment" "_ I can recommend you start with the Wikipedia article on this. You said: _" And specifically about the so-called "evolved bacteria" of Richard Lenski"_ Dr. Lenski originally set up the experiment in 1988, and it is still going. All of the 12 populations of E. coli in the experiment showed evolutionary changes, but the most spectacular change was the emergence of the possibility to use citrate as a carbon source in an aerobic environment in one of the 12 populations. Because of the way the experiment is set up, all the genetic mutations that resulted in this new functionality were documented, and this demonstrated without any doubt how errors in duplication and random mutations were influenced by natural selection to produce a new and additional stretch of DNA providing new functionality. This is now an observed fact. But please check it out for yourself.

[@Discipo]

@@HS-zk5nn This is the same as saying that there is no evolution because the animal remained an animal, I am interested in a more detailed explanation from a scientific point of view. I do not believe that what you wrote is not true, but it is not enough to form a valid opinion in my head that I can operate on

[@HS-zk5nn]

@@Discipo great what species did they turn into?

[@Az555]

Dr. Hugh Ross says that since the Hebrew language has fewer words/letters compared to English, the word for day "YOM" actually means "a period of time." This means it COULD have been a "24-hour day" or it could have been years or longer. He also states how when Eve was made Adam said "at long last" indicating that it took a long period of time from when Adam was created to when Eve was.

[@crunchyhippo8957]

The Hebrew word for day ("yom"), when accompanied by a number or period of time, ALWAYS means a literal, 24-hour day. And in Genesis chapter one, each day of creation is accompanied by BOTH, meaning that they were all regular days. Moreover, in Exodus 20:8-11 God said "Just as I created the world in six days and rested on the seventh, you', too, work six days and rest on the seventh." This unequivocally verifies that they were regular days, with Adam created on the sixth day. Hugh Ross is a compromiser, who wants his evolution-believing friends and colleagues to like him. Even renowned atheist Richard Dawkins freely admits that the Bible teaches a young world (though he doesn't believe it).

[@mwils51]

Fitting dinos on the ark would be no issue at all. They are reptiles and hatch from eggs. All Noah needed was room for an extra egg collection. Problem solved.

[@presto709]

There are many more species in the fossil record than just dinosaurs and many of them were not egg layers.

[@mwils51]

@@presto709 Of course there were, but dinosaurs is the topic here. Noah didn't carry species on the Ark, no need to, he carried kinds. Species micro-evolve from the kinds, often very rapidly.

[@bethanycearadoran-smith4192]

We also focus heavily on the big ones because they are the most spectacular, the average size was about that of a sheep. Way easier to bring than the biggest ones Noah could have found.

[@presto709]

@@bethanycearadoran-smith4192 Yes but now that you claim dinosaurs were there you have to accept the other animals shown in the fossil record. It was already ludicrous to think you carry one of each "kind" on a wooden ship, now you've multiplied it many fold and all to carry "kinds" that supposedly died off shortly after the flood.

[@logicalatheist1065]

all noah needed to do was exist... the story is mythology.

[@howdydoodey3872]

God leaves me every time I break wind. God returns to me as baked beans. I love God.

[@samburns3329]

A literal Noah's Flood / Ark was scientifically disproven over two centuries ago. For example: 1. The world is full of geologic features (angular unconformities, the vertically incised meanders in Goosenecks State Park, the Columbia Basalt Group) impossible to form in a one year one time Flood. 2. We have lots of archaeological evidence of cities and cultures (Jericho is 11,000 years old, The Jiahu culture in China is 9500 years old) which lived right through the Flood without noticing. 3. Modern genetics shows no extant species underwent a severe genetic bottleneck only 4400 years ago. If the Ark story were true ALL extant species would show such a bottleneck. 4. Besides well established radiometric dating we also have lots of non-radiometric proxies (tree rings, lake varves, ice cores) showing the Earth is way older than 6000 years and that no disrupting Flood occurred. 5. There is zero physical evidence supporting a date of the supposed Flood as 4400 years ago, with error ranges. Interesting such a huge even left no evidence of when it supposedly occurred.

[@goody8839]

Surest bet in the world - no creationist will ever address these issues which completely disprove a literal Noah's Flood. 😎

[@logicalatheist1065]

@@goody8839 creationists cant count past 10 without taking their shoes off

[@fluxnekta]

Zero evidence you say or you just choose to ignore the evidence like sea shells and carcass on mout arat in Turkey ? A 12,000 plus mountain that showed it was a seabed once upon a time google evidence for the flood

[@tims5268]

@@fluxnekta mount Ararat was by the sea twelve million years ago. Plate tectonics are a thing buddy.

[@Columbo-r4z]

@@fluxnekta Charles Darwin found sea shells 13,000 feet up in the Andes. He also witnessed a 3 foot uprising of the sea bed after just one earthquake. He followed the land inland and upwards noticing ancient coastlines now raised above sea level. He speculated that the Andes were formed from the gradual uprising of the seabed because the land was being pushed against another shelf of land. Over 100 years before plate tectonics were proven. Evolution wasn’t the only thing he discovered.

[@renierramirez9534]

Exelent video...but please don't play music background when speaking. Thanks

[@presto709]

I hate music behind speaking too.

[@logicalatheist1065]

how is it an "Exelent" video?

[@saintmalaclypse3217]

I like the music! It helps drown out Calvin's lies.

[@TacoBel]

Its not a podcast, or a lecture. It is a KZbin video, meant to be viewed like a documentary. Documentary's have music. As a video editor myself you have no idea how incredibly boring this video would be without music.

[@logicalatheist1065]

@@TacoBel it's not even educational... Just pure ignorance in a video

[@fyrestorme]

9:02 define "animal life" because there were a great number of sea creatures that would not need to be on the ark in order to survive.

[@davidmcbrine4527]

I'm very skeptical that the dinosaurs were on the ark. To presuppose they were on the ark, simply because it seems "logical" is not very compelling. Why would God require Noah to save those animals, only to quickly go extinct within a few centuries. Never mind the space on the ark being so limited. All the fossils we have of dinosaurs are in sedimentary rock showing they died in the flood. I wouldn't be dogmatic on that.

[@BiologosDebunked-h2v]

Didn't God say to bring every kind? Just saying. If the Bible says that, shouldn't we accept that as Christians?

[@davidmcbrine4527]

@@BiologosDebunked-h2v Of course! But we both know that the Bible is silent on many things. I accept everything the Bible says, but to presuppose something that isn't clear, is going out on a limb. As I said, I'm not dogmatic on this, so I may be wrong.

[@BiologosDebunked-h2v]

@@davidmcbrine4527 no offense but I think that's pretty clear. Two of every kind? Every......kind?

[@davidmcbrine4527]

@@BiologosDebunked-h2v You can't say positively "Every" kind. Did Noah bring whales onto the ark?

[@xotimyth]

​@@davidmcbrine4527Context it said land and air creatures not sea creatures.

[@JackieSkellington]

Science and archaeology are catching up to Scripture - and it's awesome! He loves watching us figure it out - God made it all - with SCIENCE!

[@Juan_van_Eeden977]

It is still the seventh day.

[@allanburns7056]

the seventh day has always been the seventh day

[@logicalatheist1065]

Still fiction

[@radianthaze5332]

God’s law has not changed, seventh day Sabbath is still His sabbath!

[@Juan_van_Eeden977]

@@logicalatheist1065 Oh ...how convenient.

[@logicalatheist1065]

@@radianthaze5332 man's law you mean

[@μακάριος00]

HALLELUJAH JESUS IS GOD

[@logicalatheist1065]

Adults that believe in Noah's ark... Epic education fail

[@TearDownThisWall]

Adults (sheep) that believe what they're told in public schools and higher education "academia". Epic fail.

[@logicalatheist1065]

@@TearDownThisWall that makes no sense...

[@logicalatheist1065]

@@TearDownThisWall maybe where you're from...

[@logicalatheist1065]

@@TearDownThisWall heliocentric model is fake? How tight is your tin foil hat?

[@CrimsonArc3.16]

@@logicalatheist1065what does the heliocentric model have to do with the topic? If you’re implying that the Bible states that the earth is the center of the universe then please provide one Biblical peace of evidence.

[@fyrestorme]

13:00 but sin existed before Adam sinned. Because Satan had already sinned. I'm not sure if that's considered separate from "creation" but I don't think it is because Satan had to be originally created as Lucifer, by God.

[@keyjam9]

You lie for money on KZbin

[@notthisguyagain8557]

What's the lie friend?

[@earthisasphere]

@@notthisguyagain8557 Pretty much everything, including the title.

[@notthisguyagain8557]

@@earthisasphere how is he lying?

[@CodyAlan17]

Amen the Bible is historical facts. Anyone who doesn’t believe that has been blinded because of the hardening of their heart. I pray the Lord will take your Stoney heart and put a heart of flesh. (Soften) your heart to Gods word and believe His word and what He says! It’s healing to the mind body and soul! He speaks life to us! He speaks healing to us! He speaks power to us! He speaks revival to us! He speaks forgiveness to us! He speaks grace to us! God is love! Hallelujah!! In the name Of Jesus Christ anyone who reads this message I pray Lord you reveal yourself To them and I pray their Stoney heart will be crushed and you can replace it a softened heart of flesh let your will be done Father! Forgive me for my sins and cleanse me by your blood! Forgive these people for they do not know what they say! They don’t know how ignorant they are for not believing in you Lord Jesus! ❤in Jesus name amen 🙏.

[@vernoncleveland6806]

Amen

[@jeffhiggins4505]

Some Native americans have legends that speak of thunderbirds that were apparently something like pterodactyls.

[@Baki_and_Friends]

For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts. ( Isaiah 55 : 9 ) Even we are the most intelligent human we cannot reach the ways and thoughts of GOD

[@EdwinDueck]

You have to remember the Bible talks about the fermanment. That a counts for them living so long. The flood didn't just come from the rain. It also came from under the earth. After the flood the sun's rays could have caused them to die off , because they where do big. The food supply could have been cut short because plants needed to grow back. Some of the plants that they lived on could have died out too. With God anything is possible.

[@graemeross6970]

Spoiler alert, here is my anticipation of the answers in the forthcoming episodes. Q. Why have no human and dinosaurs been found together? A. Fossilisation of dinosaurs and particularly humans is quite rare. Because the remains haven’t been found together doesn’t mean they didn’t live at the same time. Actually, all we know is that they weren’t buried together. It is very easy for creatures to live at the same time on earth, but never even cross paths. Then there will be some examples to verify this, so question answered. Q How did they survive and where did they go after the flood? A. They spread out but eventually became extinct. That is why there are no such creatures today. Their extinction may be due to the metamorphous that occurred due to the accumulation of sin. It will be interesting see if I'm close.

[@Bomtombadi1]

Basically every video Calvin makes

[@claybush9143]

What about the religions that predate Christianity that have almost verbatim the same flood story as Noah? How do you defend that?

[@crunchyhippo8957]

Genesis goes back to the creation of the world (chapter one, verse one), so nothing predates Christianity.

[@claybush9143]

@@crunchyhippo8957 Multiple religions predate Christianity. Hinduism is one of them and it predates Christianity and Islam by centuries.

[@enriquenieves7775]

Me myself I’m just saying 1 million years is one day for god for me I don’t know only god knows there was no dinosaurs in the time of Noah

[@jimpassi349]

THEY WERE CALLED DIFFERENT NAMES BACK THEN LIKE BOHEMOTH , LIVITHIN MAYBE MORE NAMES

[@igorkrugly4842]

Why didn't we even found the bones of dinosaurs and people in ONE stratum?

[@Bomtombadi1]

It’s a fair question, one creationists can only answer with, “They never crossed each other’s paths.” Of course, this doesn’t answer why we find Dinos in million+ yo strata and not people. But remember: creationists can’t think beyond literal. They can’t conceptualize. They can stratify thoughts. They can only hyper-focus on one thing at a time.

[@Atomic568]

One reason people did not listen to Noah’s preaching about the coming flood, was there was no rain up until God sent the rain to flood the earth. So if no one ever seen rain 🌧️ then they would undoubtedly have mocked Noah. As in our day when the gospel is preached to the ungodly world about the second coming of Christ Jesus and the destruction of this present world, not by water but by fire 🔥. They still continued to laugh and mock, to their own demise.

[@gothicbagheera]

How could Adam and Eve even commit the "first sin" against "God" before they are the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil? Wouldn't they have needed the knowledge of what was/is morally acceptable and what wasn't/isn't morally acceptable to "God" and then choose to do what wasn't/isn't morally acceptable to have sinned? If they didn't know what was good and what was evil before they ate the fruit, how could they have known it was sinning to do so? Since they had no knowledge that not listening and doing what "God" said not to do was evil, how could they have committed the first sin that resulted in the flood eventually being needed? Y'all need to accept the fact that the Bible was written by ancient man using their limited scientific knowledge from the time they lived, and isn't a factual account of historical events.

[@Columbo-r4z]

Exactly. How did they know it was wrong to disobey god? And how did they know god was the good guy? Never had an answer to it.

[@Syan62]

When you haven't read Genesis so you fall for the "oldest trick in the book" 🤡 Imagine reading and studying to find the answer to your questions rather than being edgy on the internet

[@Columbo-r4z]

@@Syan62 So what’s the answer?

[@earthisasphere]

@@Syan62 Imagine believing nonsense from 2,000 yrs ago that has been shown to be inaccurate in so many ways time and time again....

[@gothicbagheera]

@@Syan62 I have read Genesis, many times, and have diligently tried to find the answer to that question, but the answer is nowhere inside the text that is written. I could only find different people's twisted interprretations of the text, but not in the actual text. Imagine being so brainwashed you try to make fun of someone asking a logical question because you don't know how to answer the question in any logical way. 🤡

[@SerendipityPoint]

I love these “does the Bible say” questions. It’s literally parroting the devil when he said to “did God really say”? Same deceptive tactic.

[@JoseSalloum]

Part two of my answer: The topic of whether death and prehistoric creatures, like dinosaurs, existed before Adam is an area of considerable debate in theology and biblical interpretation. This discussion often revolves around a few specific passages, particularly Genesis 1:1-2, the warning God gave to Adam and Eve, and the role of death in creation. Some interpretations suggest that Genesis hints at the existence of a pre-Adamic world where death and animal life cycles already existed, including possibly the era of dinosaurs. The Structure of Genesis 1:1-2: The Gap Theory Genesis 1:1 states, "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." Following this, verse 2 continues, "And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep." This passage has led to what is known as the "Gap Theory," which posits that there could be a significant time lapse between these two verses. According to this interpretation, Genesis 1:1 may refer to an initial act of creation, while Genesis 1:2 marks the beginning of a re-creation or ordering of an already existing world. Supporters of this theory suggest that a previous world existed before the six days of "making" and organizing creation. This interpretation allows for the existence of prehistoric life, including dinosaurs, and suggests that they could have lived and died in this pre-Adamic period. This theory aligns with the possibility that death and life cycles, especially within the animal kingdom, were part of the natural order prior to the creation of Adam. Death Existed Before Adam: Biblical Indicators When God warns Adam in Genesis 2:17, “for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die,” it implies that death was a known concept. The very fact that God speaks of death as a consequence indicates that Adam had a context for understanding it. This warning implies that Adam, prior to the fall, was aware of what it meant to die, possibly from observing the natural world around him. If death did not exist at all, God’s warning may have lacked the impact it would have had. Adam’s understanding of death implies that he had seen some form of death in the created order-possibly among animals or plants. The Bible records that God gave Adam the role of naming the animals, and as he observed nature, he could have witnessed predatory behavior, life cycles, and decay, even if humanity itself was initially immune to death. In Genesis 3:3, Eve echoes this warning when she tells the serpent, "But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die." The phrase "lest ye die" implies an existing threat, something Eve and Adam were aware of. God’s warning to not even “touch” the tree indicates that death was something to be avoided, suggesting that Adam and Eve may have had a reference point for understanding it. The Pre-Adamic World and Dinosaurs If we consider the Gap Theory, the period between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2 could allow for the existence of prehistoric life, including dinosaurs. The fossil record shows that creatures lived and died long before humans appeared. This understanding can fit within a biblical framework if we see these creatures as part of an initial creation that existed before the re-organization described in the six days of making. Isaiah 45:18 states, "For thus saith the Lord that created the heavens; God himself that formed the earth and made it; he hath established it, he created it not in vain, he formed it to be inhabited." Some interpret this verse as implying that the earth was created with order and purpose, suggesting that the state described in Genesis 1:2 ("without form, and void") may represent a disruption or judgment on a previously created world. This interpretation leaves room for the idea that an earlier creation, which included animals like dinosaurs, experienced death and destruction before the re-ordering of the earth during the six days. Death in the Animal Kingdom Before Adam If death existed in the animal kingdom before the fall, this would align with the natural behaviors seen in animals, such as hunting, predation, and territoriality. Observing animals with predatory instincts would have given Adam a reference for what it meant to kill or to be killed. Scripture does not describe animals receiving the same moral commands as humans, and it’s likely that animal death served ecological purposes in balancing populations and sustaining ecosystems. Furthermore, Romans 5:12 states, "Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned." This verse specifically links the entrance of death to humanity through Adam, not necessarily to animals. If we understand this verse to mean that human death entered the world through Adam’s sin, then it’s plausible that animal death was already part of the created order before Adam’s transgression. This view allows for a natural world that included predation and the death of animals without contradicting biblical teachings on human sin and death. The Role of Humanity and Immortality In Genesis, humanity is presented as unique, made in the image of God and granted dominion over creation. Adam and Eve were placed in a garden where they were given access to the Tree of Life, suggesting that they were initially set apart from the natural cycles of death affecting the rest of creation. The Tree of Life seems to represent a source of continued life, reinforcing the idea that humanity was designed to be immune to death as long as they were in right relationship with God. Genesis 3:22 supports this idea when God, after the fall, says, "And now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever." This implies that continued access to the Tree of Life would have granted Adam and Eve perpetual life, but because of sin, they were cut off from it, and human death became inevitable. This view suggests that humans were meant to transcend the mortality present in the rest of the animal kingdom but lost that privilege due to sin. Reconciling Dinosaurs, Death, and the Biblical Account Given the evidence of fossil records showing that dinosaurs and other prehistoric animals lived and died long before humans, the Gap Theory provides a framework for harmonizing the existence of these creatures with the biblical narrative. If a pre-Adamic world existed, it could explain the death of these ancient creatures, aligning with God’s command to Adam about the consequences of eating from the Tree of Knowledge. Under this view, dinosaurs and other ancient creatures may have existed and perished before the six days of ordering and forming the earth, which prepared the world for human habitation. The fossil record, which shows cycles of life and extinction, can be understood as part of a previous creation that experienced death long before humanity’s arrival. Conclusion: Death as Part of the Pre-Adamic World In summary, the Bible’s language in Genesis 1-3, particularly the terms used for “create” and “made,” allows for the interpretation that death existed before Adam. The Gap Theory suggests a possible time period between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2, during which prehistoric life, including dinosaurs, could have existed and experienced death. God’s warning to Adam about death if he disobeyed suggests that death was a known reality, likely observable in the natural order around him. The distinction in Romans 5:12, which attributes the entrance of death to humanity through Adam, further supports the idea that animal death may have already been part of creation. Humanity, made in God’s image, was initially set apart from this cycle, intended to live eternally in fellowship with God. However, due to sin, humans were subjected to death, marking a fundamental change in their relationship with God and creation. This understanding allows for a biblical interpretation that accommodates both the fossil record and the existence of death before Adam, providing a coherent perspective on the complex relationship between creation, death, and the fall.

[@anttisalminen1110]

where did the 24h day came, before the earth was created?

[@attuthai7632]

We know Batteries keep Mobile and Laptops Please Research and make video on which energy is keeping your heart to pump ?

[@jimpassi349]

YOU CAN ALSO FIND THEM IN OLD STORYS // KNIGHTS SAVING DAMELES IN DISTRESS

[@notthisguyagain8557]

I believe the giants of the Earth that somehow survived the flood hunted the dinosaurs to extinction.

[@presto709]

Or maybe space aliens took them to another planet.

[@notthisguyagain8557]

@@presto709 how?

[@burnttoast2790]

That won't explain why we don't still have dinosaurs of similar size to mammalian fauna today.

[@logicalatheist1065]

Why on earth would you believe that?

[@presto709]

@@notthisguyagain8557 Sarcasm

[@andrewchambers5884]

Thank you for this presentation. I would like to comment on the meaning of Romans 5:12 that you quoted in the video. Paul does not mention the animal world in these verses, he seems to be referring to how sin and death entered the human world. I think that it is mistaken to apply these verses to the animal world.

[@TacoBel]

Then why would God give the beasts to Adam only after creation? If animal death is not the same as human death (physically) then why not give Adam meat before the fall? Not saying I have the gaurenteed correct interpretation of Romans 5:12, but I believe the word Death refers to both Physical and Spritual, and the Physical would also include animals. For example, if I ask if you have a computer... why in that context would you get to pick if I am refering to only Mac or only Windows. Or why cant I be including phones as well? That isn't a perfect example, but it is the simplest (and first) thing I could think of to explain how I see it. Say for reason of argument, if the word death only refers to Humans. If animals died before the fall then... A. God would view that as Good, and then Very Good. B. Animal sacrifice would not atone for sin, or at least there would then be no difference between animal sacrifice and plant sacrifice. Yet we see with Cain and Able that one is pleasing to God, the other is not.

[@andrewchambers5884]

@@TacoBel In Genesis 2:17 God tells Adam that "in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die" this statement predicts the spiritual and later physical death of Adam and consequently all humans because all human sin as Adam did. This does not preclude the existence of animal and plant death prior to Adam's sin. It only states how death entered Adam's world ie the world of humans. The video assumes that animal death did not exist before Adam sinned. Genesis 2 and Romans 5 do not address that. They address how death go into the human world.

[@andrewchambers5884]

@@TacoBel I think that Moses in Genesis 2 and Paul in Roman 5 are speaking about the spiritual death that results from sin. Only humans experience this spiritual death not animals.

[@Howto-hf2iw]

At the same time , bible it says that for God ,a day is like thousands of years?

[@marlop1970]

Answers in Genesis? (for science?)..ok ....then why don't you write a serious scientific paper to be peer reviewed, you'd be Nobel Prize by now.

[@Bomtombadi1]

Because conspirators in power want a one world order in which they answer to no one. Creationist rationale in a nutshell.

[@badideass]

AIG has absolutely nothing to do with anything scientific

[@badideass]

Creationists are proud of being scientifically illiterate

[@ejmproductions8198]

What would be the purpose of saving the Dinosaurs only to have them die shortly afterward?

[@Therealweirdo]

Some Dianasours changed as Snake.. others died when God cursed them

[@JumpingJack-w2l]

Well, in my opinion, it was a really bad move not to preserve pterodactyls. Having brontosauruses roaming in nature reserves to visit would have been great, too. It could have been good if those dinosaurs had been preserved.

[@zerosteel0123]

God doesn't make bad moves! 😉

[@ralphreinert]

@@zerosteel0123 "God doesn't make bad moves!" Yet he repented that he had made man. Gen 6:6

[@zerosteel0123]

@@ralphreinert and yet saved them in the end...... point?

[@burnttoast2790]

@@zerosteel0123 Yes, he kept his favorite group of people around to serve as a global do-over, because he made a mistake and had to wipe the system. If this sort of "clear the board and start over" isn't indicative of a bad move then I don't know what is.

[@ralphreinert]

​@@zerosteel0123 If God felt that not making mankind would have been a better choice than making them, doesn't that mean that he felt making mankind was a worse choice than simply not making them in the first place? How could choosing the worse option not be a mistake? If, on the other hand, God considered having mankind sin and then redeeming them through Jesus's sacrifice to be the best outcome, why would he repent having made mankind?

[@AnthonyCarrier]

They died at the same time as the humans during the flood 4000+ years ago...

[@crunchyhippo8957]

Even evolutionists like Dr. Karl Shuker, the world's premier cryptozoologist, admits that dinosaurs, or animals like them, lived until recently - and even today in remote, inaccessible places of the world. See his book "Prehistoric Survivors."

[@raccoon6072]

I learned a lot from this video. 😂😂😂😂.....😢

[@igorkrugly4842]

Let alone the dinosaurs, how did the rest of megafauna fit inside a boat. That's a miracle! Only an allmighty God could do that... Being incapable of just painlessly and instantly taking life spirit from his flawed creation...

[@Dr.EverydayGuyWatcher]

We have to ask science if the forms are really like that lizards? Because a hippotamus skeleton looks like Dino but when they ahve meat they look cute.

[@djthatnigerian9174]

❤

[@wildwatey1897]

Albert Einstein being a genius believed in god. And foos that dropped out at a young age and cope with alcohol and drug abuse dispute the idea of god bc “ it doesn’t make sense why he would let a cruel world take place”

[@my-yt-inputs2580]

Just some comments about Genesis 6. There was not just 2 pair brought on the Ark but of Clean animals it was 7 pairs and Unclean it was 2 pairs. Calvin said 7 of some. What does that mean? Be clear. This is clear in scripture. Also in reference to the beginning....there are a subset of people who feel there was a creation, destruction and then recreation between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2. Is that possible? Also multiple references to Lucifer, the Angel of Light, Anointed Cherub, who ruled the Angels before he was cast out. So when/where was this taking place? Before Adam certainly. So if before Adam something in a heavenly realm had to exist. And then there's the whole let there be light. Before the Sun, Moon and stars were created. The scriptures sure seem silent on these tidbits.

[@beanflowers7882]

This is where I get confused, 2peter 3 verse 8. But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. Therefore is it not possible that the 6 days of creation and one day of rest might be actually 7, 000 years ?

[@crunchyhippo8957]

So, Jonah was in the belly of the whale for 3,000 years? Perhaps Jesus is still in the tomb? This New Testament quote isn't a time formula for the Old Testament. It's Peter saying that whether it takes one day or a thousand years, God's promises will come to pass.

[@Howsthat-xq3sn]

👍

[@allanburns7056]

the bible says work six days and rest the seventh day it doesn't say work six days and choose the day you can rest

[@colonalklink14]

SDA Church is a cult.

[@ramtrucks721]

Dont confuse old with new testaments

[@earthisasphere]

@@colonalklink14 Well yeah, most religions are extremely cult like, if not a full blown cult.

[@colonalklink14]

@@allanburns7056 SDA Church is a cult.

[@colonalklink14]

@@earthisasphere My original comment got deleted by Sharia Tube.

[@nancywhitehead219]

What about the lions and tigers and bears!?!?!?

[@animesquish4314]

Noah could have brought small juvenile version of their young on board, and/or he could have brought dinosaur eggs too.

[@fluxnekta]

A video I saw suggested eggs of animals as well

[@earthisasphere]

Elephants don't give birth until age 14-15. There are many other organisms that don't reach sexual maturity until later on as well. You aren't bringing juveniles of those animals. You already have a big enough problem with the food source for all those animals both on the ark and once they get off. There are no plants to eat, they are all dead from being miles underwater for a year, and the carnivores have to wait for the other animals to have sex and give birth before chowing down. How nice of them to wait months, and sometimes years, before eating.

[@Bomtombadi1]

Yes, let’s just ignore the logistical issues surrounding the exponentially greater amounts of energy that juveniles require as well.