I got to be honest I was skeptical going into this video, but the fact that you highlighted the positives of a SL grade entire makes me believe you’re truthful and upfront with the audience that is lacking in a lot of videos, especially sponsored videos. Great job.!
@nkiaoda102510 ай бұрын
Me too! That earned a subscriber out of me. There's so many KZbin videos that echo the same thing. I bought some SL Toyo A/T 3 tires yesterday and I started second guessing my choice. This makes me feel much better that I made the right choice for my 4Runner.
@zapcodeknock45036 ай бұрын
@@nkiaoda1025I hope they're good! Toyota owner here and my new setup i have is an SL tire from xL tire. Just need to have them installed
@nkiaoda10256 ай бұрын
@@zapcodeknock4503 So far I've been really happy with my choice. We've only had them offroad once (70 miles of forest service roads) and they did great. Good luck with your tires, and happy trails to ya!!
@AnthonyMartinez-gg1pc8 ай бұрын
I almost skipped this video!! I am glad and feel smarter after watching it and admit I was wrong. Thank you for taking the time to do it, and I look forward to watching more.
@matthew.tamasco Жыл бұрын
Thanks for putting this together. I just realized that a shop sold me LT tires for an older 2dr Wrangler and now I know why they don't flex as much and ride poorly on the road. I won't make the same mistake on my baby Ford Ranger. Thanks!!!
@daveisnothere10 ай бұрын
Drop the air down. The pressure required for an LT tire is usually significantly lower than what an SL tire needs to carry the same weight. Chalk test FTW!
@matthew.tamasco10 ай бұрын
@@daveisnothere you are correct, but I can't air down any lower to match the flex of a p-rated tire without going below safe pressures for a road legal non-beadlock rim.
@daveisnothere10 ай бұрын
@@matthew.tamasco You may be surprised how low you can go with a load range C/D/E tire with a modern alloy wheel. They have a very robust bead locking ridge on the inside of the wheel. When you have to break the bead manually in the field with a tire hammer you'll find out exactly how good it really is, I've fought plenty of them myself. I have driven my 67 CJ5 with LR C 33x1250R15's about a mile at 40 mph with the valve cores removed to prove a point about airing down "too far" once. This included 4 right hand turns at intersections. I have never had a bead come off and no damage has ever been done to my tires running single digit pressures everywhere. My CJ only weighed 2000 lbs though and one tire was rated to carry 2500. A Wrangler weighs in at 3200 lbs for a YJ and up to 5800 lbs for the heaviest 2024 model. Since a typical Load range C tire is rated to carry at least 2500 lbs, They can be aired down enough for running in the sand without getting too low for non-beadlock wheels. Load range E would probably hold a Wrangler up even almost flat. I am actually a little concerned that tire manufacturers are getting rid of Load Range C and going to mostly Load Range E in a lot of tire sizes that smaller SUVs/pickups run. A friend has been trying to find some 16" tires for his Tacoma and almost all he can find are LR E.
@matthew.tamasco10 ай бұрын
@@daveisnothere I understand what you are saying but I'm still not going to run a tire at 1 or 2 psi and still not get the flex and grip that a p-rated tire gives me at 10psi or more. It's about off trail grip that you simply can't get on many LT tires under a light vehicle because no matter how low you run the psi, you can't get the same level of tire flex.
@fullbass14263 ай бұрын
Yeah most people in my country choose tires based on how it looks. K02s are really popular here but most sizes i see on dealers are LTs. They put LT tires yet only use the truck on the city carrying nothing on the back most of the time.
@pn31210 ай бұрын
My C load KO2s are about 8 lbs lighter than the same tire with an E load rating. Both are LT but I feel that my tires provide a very comfortable ride. I don't know if the E load are more puncture resistant, but I believe that they're stiffer. I'm happy with the c load rated version.
@HarrySituations8 ай бұрын
That is what I found when making this video. Now I just with that there were more large tires offered in Load Range C!
@SuperbBicycle4 ай бұрын
@@HarrySituations yeah we need to lobby the tire manufacturers to make sl or c rated tires in larger sizes. Largest I’ve found are just over 34”. 35/36/37 would be great also in something narrower than 12.5.
@jasonlovell3934 Жыл бұрын
I have seen much better durability out of LT tires than SL on suburban/Tahoe vehicles. It would be nice if the manufacturers made more C load tires for the sizes that are popular for Jeeps and Toyotas.
@zapcodeknock45036 ай бұрын
A big ass Suburban probably needs those heavier tires for sure
@oliverdanisi3483 Жыл бұрын
You seem to have forgotten to mention unsprung weight, unsprung weight can make a huge difference to ride quality as well as shock longevity and the way the truck handles and reacts during critical situations. I would appreciate seeing some content exploring more into this topic!! Great video!! I appreciate you shining some light on this topic, as I run into more and more people running LT tires arbitrarily on rigs that don't need them.
@HarrySituations Жыл бұрын
Great point about the unsprung weight. I’ve always considered it when shopping for wheels but haven’t given it enough consideration in the past for tires.
@AllTerrainFamily Жыл бұрын
I guess he didn't mention it, but I did notice that the way the LT tires react to bumps differs greatly from the SLs. It's hard to quantify, but I definitely felt it. You can feel the inertia of the wheel/tire delaying moving with the terrain. I will also note that we did not change shock settings between the two tires, which may have helped but would have muddied the waters for sure.
@vr-tl9uh27 ай бұрын
@@AllTerrainFamilydo you mean the LT reacts more poorly to terrain ? Or is that a benefit that it doesn’t move as much?
@AllTerrainFamily7 ай бұрын
@@vr-tl9uh2 I wouldn't call it a benefit. When a heavy tire hits a bump it transmits that forst into the car and the suspension can't control it. With the lighter tires, the suspension reacts, and you feel less impact.
@vr-tl9uh27 ай бұрын
@@AllTerrainFamily understandable. I have an 18’ Silverado 1500 that came with 265/65/r18 P metric tires. I found the Recons come with larger sizes that are in hard metric. The size I was seeing was a 295/70/r18 which comes in both hard metric 116 index or a heavy LT E. Do I need to upgrade to LT or could I stick with hard metric? My use is daily driver with some forest/ desert roads trips once in a while. I don’t do anything serious like MOAB, etc.
@87toyhighlux7 күн бұрын
I like the video, but I will stick with LT tires for my 2020 Tacoma. I use to run SL 4 ply tires on my off road vehicles, until my friends and I had too many blow out off road from rocks going through the tire and sidewalls. What convinced me to get LT tires was tread rip, there is no on trail repair for this that I know of, on a narrow off road trail in the evening and very little room to change it even at a wide stretch of the road. 6 years later, I haven’t had a blowout.
@ChristopherSeaDawg23 күн бұрын
I put the Ridge Grapplers on my F-150. There the LT and they do ride stiffer than the Wranglers that came with the truck. I haul quite a bit and that’s why I went with them. Great off road & enjoy the performance. Your video was spot on!
@thecount10013 ай бұрын
a mistake i made in the past, with either tires, is being fearful to truly air down. i would reduce pressure from 35 to 30 thinking that this was it for safety. i learned later that if you are not going more than say, 70 or 80 kph (which you rarely are off pavement, and i don't do any 'desert running') you can safely air down to 18-20psi. that's where the ride quality, traction and puncture resistance comes from. it's such a dramatic improvement. on my Nissan Xterra i now use only SL (P rated) tires and air down accordingly, with a proper compressor on hand at all times. time consuming but worth it.
@chrissanders5414 ай бұрын
great video brother ,, nice information I find sl tires are great but if u load up a 4runner with bumpers, racks, sliders, camping gear, coolers, cloths, drinking water,ete,etc,etc and people plus add a travel trailer on the back, u need E rated LT tires at a min of 60psi for extra load on tires ,, E rated LT tires need to be ran with more air than SL tires I noticed I find around 44 psi for gas mileage and ride ,, at 32 psi E rated tires on my 4runner gets horrible gas mileage it doesn't coast downhill good at all ,etc,etc,etc that's all i've noticed so far with my E rated LTX Michelin Defender 2 tires vs the factory tires. most say 50psi is min for E rated tires but Goodrich says "Must change tire pressure from 32 to 44 with E rated KO2 tires" so that's where I started 44 instead of 50 psi in tires and they're about right ,, till u load up for a trip I don't need a aggressive off road tire as I just go camping, rivers, national parks, national forests , throw on my travel trailer ,etc ,, but I do need the extra load range of the LT E rated 10 ply tires if my all season mud and snow tires can't take me there i don't need to go I figure .....
@applesbighatranch690610 күн бұрын
I had hoped to run a 17" LT on my 2016 F150 but in a C Load Range. Then I wanted a narrower tire than what most brands were offering... Fast forward to Toyo's D Load Range, 34" X 10.50" X R17LT A/TIII. Bingo. Perfect tire for a dual-porpoise 1/2 ton daily-driven off highway roamin' rig. Great vid. I had been running P-Metrics in a 285/70-17 and while the sidewalls were thinner, I never had many issues with them. They're a great option for smaller, lighter dual-purpose rigs. Don't be afear'd o' the P-Metric/Metric (SL or non-LT) tires. Just be sure to air down when necessary for tire carcass compliance over obstacles, carry both a tire patch/plug repair kit - and - a sidewall repair kit like GlueTread. You already have a compressor or other air supply because you have to air up for the highway home. Cheers!
@leventbuda229414 күн бұрын
Thanks sor info, ı wanna buy m/t baja boss at or falken wildpeak at4w, It seems like it should be SL for better grip, especially on snow and ice.
@matthewm3912 Жыл бұрын
Been looking for a solid explanation between the two. Getting ready to put a new set of tires on my 2013 ford expedition EL Limited. Wasn't sure if i needed the E load since its such a big SUV, but i think SL is going to be just fine. All highway/city driving on all season tires.
@RobertoFarrenPhoto Жыл бұрын
This was exactly the comparison that I was looking for right now and deciding between the SL and LT's. I've had the SL Wildpeaks AT3Ws in the stock size for the 4runner and looking at the extra weight moving up to the 285 LTs just seemed a lot for what we use the motor for. After this I'm taking a serious look at the the AT3Ws in the 285/70R17 SL size which only adds an extra 4lbs per tire vs 12.4lbs in the LT E load variant, it gives the same height increase and like you stated provides a nicer ride on and off road. Also the better MPG and less stress on the drivetrain is great, providing hopefully better reliability in the long run. Easier to change a punctured tire on the trail/road than some other link. I just wished Falken made a 275/70R17 C load that didn't weigh as much (give or take) as the 285 LT E load, so as to have a nice middle ground, I reckon that would be perfect! Thanks for the video, really useful!
@chuckgmanleyphotos7197 Жыл бұрын
One of the more informative videos on tires!
@HarrySituations Жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@zapcodeknock45036 ай бұрын
This is amazing, i have already ordered and recieved my new set of wheel and tires and am going from an XL 15in to a SL 16in flon my truck when installed. The amount of weight i'm saving is 40 plus lbs. I'm hoping the ride comfort for bumpy and gravel roads eases up plenty. The XL tires have performed amazingly in the ways I would want them to. But i couldn't pass up the deal on tires that I bought and the chance of letting someone else by the wheels i like. Edit: thanks for the interesting video content like this video here.
@JimmyDevere Жыл бұрын
I concurr with the conclusions stated. Jeep Wrangler Rubicon comes standard with Load C KO2s. I have a set of load D KO22 in about the same size and there is a noticeable difference in ride quality. I would never even consider a load range E unless I absolutely needed the additional load capacity. The KO2a have excellent side wall protection and I have never had any issues with them. I am not even sure there is a difference in side wall protection between the load ranges. On my fourth set BTW.
@G0by0ne3 ай бұрын
Thanks this seems to be a common question, LT or SL. I recently bought a Landcruiser and I want to upgrade the crappy OEM tires. AT4W wildpeak in SL. Awesome video!
@georgederocher82023 ай бұрын
Getting ready to replace the SL Wildpeak AT3W on my 2019 Colorado Z71. 90 percent highway , off roading would be Texas Hill Country, Big Bend area and the beach. I was contemplating going LT for sidewall protection , but I think you’ve convinced me to stay SL. Might compromise and go with Goodyear with the Kevlar. KO3 only available in E load for my size for at least 6 months, and the Wildpeak AT4 are stupid heavy. I usually carry 2 spares for West Texas trips, and a patch kit. Even considering skinny to keep or gain height without rubbing on stock suspension. I average at least 20k miles a year here in South Texas. At my age (61) function and sensibility over looks . Only towing is a Casita, gross 3500 lbs. Oddly, it now sports KO3 245/75/16 for plumbing clearance. New axle and 2.5” lift. I don’t like breaking things .
@chriswasnesky1494 Жыл бұрын
Great info as usual. There are so many awesome overbuilt heavy duty tires today. Nice to have choices, and some rigs need them. But some milder or lighter rigs don't...
@anantdabholkar685Ай бұрын
I find that deeper tread depth prevents flats from the usual hazards nails and screws on the road. I had winter tires and was getting flats every 3-6 months, and after switching to M/S tires I haven had any in a year! Same roads, same brand (Michelin), similar tire pressures.
@ERLPD711 ай бұрын
Great video. Interested to see what you think about something I am working on. Currently running E Load Duratracs (285/70/17) and ride is rough and MPG is poor. All I have on my vehicle is a roof rack and underbody armor (total is probably around 350 lbs). I am thinking about running Toyo AT 3 in SL in the Winter as I don’t then and a separate wheel and tire package in the summer when I do tow my small teardrop. Probably a C Load. Do you think I would be good or do you think that due to the armor I should run a C Load in the Winter as well. I live in CO for what it’s worth. Thanks and great video!
@HarrySituations11 ай бұрын
I think that you will be fine with the standard load tires in the winter. Some of your mileage loss might be due to the roof rack. Not sure how easy it is to remove but I would be curious if you see an improvement in mileage.
@ERLPD711 ай бұрын
@@HarrySituations I actually went from 17 mpg down to 14 mpg with just the body armor. Oddly enough, I just added the aluminum roof rack from a steel roof basket just this past month to it and now I am sitting at 14.8 mpg. Took it to a tire shop after a month to see if anything needed to be adjusted and they said no and everything looked good.
@daveisnothere10 ай бұрын
Biggest issue I've seen, that is more common lately, is so many people put a load range E tire on a lighter vehicle and then still run the pressure listed on the door jam , or worse yet, the max pressure listed on the sidewall. Do the chalk test, it will tell you really close to the pressure you need for your vehicle/tire combo. Don't worry if there is a bit of variance between the 4 tires either, or if the pressure seems low.
@dirf554 Жыл бұрын
With the LT tires you had a blip that showed 80 PSI MAX. What are the benefits of increasing tire pressure and why would I do that? My door jam says 35.
@HarrySituations Жыл бұрын
You would want to run more air if you had a heavy vehicle or were towing.
@kentonseydellaolcp4785 Жыл бұрын
Door jam psi is for stock size and load rated tires.
@rsmeanie3 күн бұрын
Made the mistake of getting LT 33x12.5x18 Toyos RT's for my Jeep Wrangler Unlimited years ago. The ride was significantly harder and sacrificed acceleration. I replaced them with a set of SL load of the same model after they wore out and it was a night and day difference.
@justinwilliams21443 ай бұрын
There's an option between the SL and the LT. The XL Mickey Thompson Baja Boss is what I run on my F-150
@spiralnapkin9 ай бұрын
What would you consider "towing a lot"? I tow my camper about a dozen or more times per year. It weighs 6000 lbs. Is LT the better choice?
@HarrySituations8 ай бұрын
What vehicle are you towing with? How much does it weigh?
@spiralnapkin8 ай бұрын
@@HarrySituations 2008 Toyota Sequoia. Factory tow package and airbags.
@HarrySituations8 ай бұрын
@@spiralnapkinI would probably run LT tires on your Sequoia. You could get away with Standard Load tire but your Toyota weighs quite a bit more and makes a whole lot more power than the Tacoma in this video. Add in the towing and I think the LT is the right call. If you are running the stock size there are some good LT options in Load Range C that I think would be a perfect fit.
@bricks-mortar5 ай бұрын
TY. One of better videos on light truck tires.
@adam_mawz_maas Жыл бұрын
I went with the LT tires on my Silverado 1500, but as somebody who runs lot of dirt road solo, the puncture resistance is more important to me than to most. I'd probably go for standard load otherwise.
@HarrySituations Жыл бұрын
Yeah the puncture resistance is something that is hard to quantify.
@mabernexpeditions9409 Жыл бұрын
Same reason i put lt's on my subaru crosstrek
@pennmikael Жыл бұрын
E and c load for my Yokohama g015 we’re the same price. I originally wanted the e since it had more tread and presumably longer tread life. Glad I didn’t since I don’t even feel the tires are grippy enough in the street now.
@HarrySituations Жыл бұрын
The greater tread depth was always a motivating factor for me as well. I was surprised when I couldn’t visibly tell the difference between the two Recon Grapplers.
@xstablishedtvАй бұрын
Would a light truck tire be good if pulling a food truck 4-5 days a week?
@HarrySituationsАй бұрын
I would go with the LT tire for that situation.
@xstablishedtvАй бұрын
@ thank you!!🙌🏽
@happytrailsmtb80112 күн бұрын
What if I tow a not so big trailer? I have an F150 and would prefer a p285/70/17 over an lt due to ride quality/unsprung weight savings. I do tow a small travel trailer that weighs 3100# dry. What do you recommend?
@njbinkers Жыл бұрын
What about load C vs Load E like what’s on a Jeep rubicon is load C
@HarrySituations Жыл бұрын
That would be comparable to our Standard Load in this video. Nitto makes a 35x11.5R17 Trail Grappler in a Load Range C that I ordered for my Tundra to replace the Load Range E tires after making this video.
@kentonseydellaolcp4785 Жыл бұрын
Check that your replacement tires can meet the GAWR of your vehicle. Tire weight limits vary between sizes and weight ratings. Do your homework carefully.
@Yielar1Ай бұрын
I like to run LT tires on my F150 Powerboost and after running Nitto Ridge Graplers for the past 6 years went with Toyo Open Country AT3 with my new truck and like them a lot more. The ride seems smoother and they perform much better on wet roads as I noticed the Ridge Graplers would tend to hydroplane. The new Toyo's do have the 3 Mountain Peak symbol so I'm going to run them this winter and see how they do. If I decide to buy some winter specific tires for next winter, I'm definitely going with SL tires this time around. I don't think my F150 is heavy enough to run LT winter tires and even though they were studded Hankook iPike, they didn't perform very well at all on slick roads. Just sold them as I lost confidence in them last winter.
@krashnpa Жыл бұрын
Harry never gets tired... of talking about tires!
@HarrySituations Жыл бұрын
It’s true!
@mariluzarco4355 Жыл бұрын
89
@seanu49632 ай бұрын
I've got a 2nd gen sequoia that sees alot of dirt/gravel as well as some 4x4 trails on a regular basis. I went with sl for the onroad,mpg and cushion. I haven't messed with airing down yet... that's next and I guess I'll find out how solid the sidewalls are, and learn how to use a tire repair kit 😂
@scottsullivan7176Ай бұрын
I have a 2024 Toyota Land Cruiser and do a bit off off road but not extreme rock climbing. I also pull a drift boat What would you suggest? LT or SL?
@daveisnothere21 күн бұрын
Problem with your question is LT can be Load Range C, D, E, or F... C should be plenty for your Cruiser, D doesnt really exist anymore and E will be a bit much. Some SL tires on the market are not much thinner than the LR C tires but there are many advantages to the Load Range C if you can find them. They will run cooler, last longer, take less air pressure, and the ride will be a little firmer and perhaps not feel squishy.
@scottsullivan717621 күн бұрын
@ thank you
@wg57685 ай бұрын
Excellent video! My used Ford f150 came with LT tires,load range E. I will replace them with standard load tires when it's time.
@r35tmanbash6 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing your input on these tires. I have been looking for a replacement in a 37" which Nitto makes.
@DaddyDFL2 ай бұрын
I have a silverado 1500 4x4...in Florida. Our offroad is sugar sand and maybe mud. No rocks. Since I'm not towing anything and mostly road driving with the opportunity to turn off...i guess SL would be fine? What you think?
@MikeR55Ай бұрын
Go for an LT C, (not LT E). LT tires have a deeper tread, usually 16/32 versus SL at 12 or 13/32. Better traction with LT C in sand and mud.
@BillaDaKillaАй бұрын
I’m starting a mobile detailing business out of a Chevy Astro van. It takes 215/ 75R15.. wondering if I should get the high load range with the water tank and equipment.. all the seats will be out and no passengers. I still can’t make a decision. Any advice?
@MikeR55Ай бұрын
I had the same van. You can put on a wider tire. 225/75R15, possibly a 235 and choose C load range.
@HarrySituationsАй бұрын
I would go with an LT tire. Water tanks get heavy in a hurry!
@LuisG-h2d12 күн бұрын
Recently mounted some used wheels with 33x12.50r20lt and I’m getting a LOUD road noise coming from the passenger side as if I’m running on a flat. What can cause this sound?
@curtisdevault8 ай бұрын
This is exactly what I was looking for. After running E-loads on my Xterra for years and buying a new Tacoma I couldn’t decided between a C-load or SL, I’m going to stick with an SL now.
@Redsr5Ай бұрын
I run LT tires on my 89 Toyota pickup but I just want the extra durability
@charlestiffany1526 Жыл бұрын
What about a mainly daily driven Silverado 1500 that tows 5500lbs maybe twice or three times a year.
@HarrySituations Жыл бұрын
I think I would probably get the LT tires for your truck since you do tow sometimes. I think the tread life will be better too since they are a little harder compound and you have a V8.
@michaelsanchez7798 Жыл бұрын
Sipes are not to evacuate snow but to pack it in. Snow on snow friction is not too bad and that makes for a better snow tire.
@HarrySituations Жыл бұрын
My understanding is that the pressure from your tire melts the snow and if it doesn't have any place to go that little sheet of water/ice will cause hydroplaning.
@michaelsanchez7798 Жыл бұрын
If the road is rocky and the snow is little, mud tires will still work. If the snow is deep enough that the bumpy road smooths out or it is a smooth surface to begin with, a winter tire will start to out perform a mud tire in a significant way. In the situation where the snow tire wins, compare it to a mud tire. A mud tire ejects everything and looks clean in the snow. A good snow tire will be heavily packed with snow. Packing snow into the tire is what makes it work well in the snow. Look at some picture of winter tires in action compared to mud tires that remove everything, or try the comparison yourself, should be fun anyway. Another way to see snow on snow friction is to make a very tightly packed snow ball, then try to sheer it.
@daveisnothere10 ай бұрын
One thought after watching. With the load range E air pressure should be lower than with the SL tire. For street do the chalk test on both and it will be obvious. For an example, on my fathers 70 CJ5 he ran a SL and load range C at different times the same size. With the SL he ran 30 psi and with the LT he ran 20 psi, this was street pressure. Off road he dropped to 15 and 8 respectively. The difference between a SL and those load range E tires is even greater. Years ago an old-timer explained the main difference between a SL and LT tire, regardless of the actually weight they can carry, this is the 'duty cycle', which no one seems to know about the last several years. A SL tire is rated to carry it's max load 20% of the time, like an occassional trip to the dump hauling trash, the LT tire has a 100% duty cycle so you can run it at max capacity all the time. As far as puncture resistance, after being in the tire business since 1980 and an avid 4x4 enthusiast since the late 60's i have yet to see a sidewall puncture in a SL tire that wouldnt have also punctured an LT sidewall. Lower air pressure is more protection against them than the tire design.
@HarrySituations10 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing your experience Dave! I do feel like the LT tire is tougher; but sometimes the SL tire can deflect and conform to an object that might puncture the stiffer tire. Or at least that is my thinking.
@daveisnothere10 ай бұрын
@HarrySituations Thank you as well for being the most accurate YT'er I've seen with the information you provided. Tires are very much misunderstood even by the newer so-called professionals especially when it comes to pressure, wheel width and load rating, as well as how those 3 interact. If you put a typical SL tire next to an LT tire the thickness of the sidewall isn't really as different as you may think. Maybe 1/16th of an inch in most cases, and once you compare a C to a D or E the sidewalls may be actually the same. I've even seen higher load ranges where they were even thinner than their lower rated brother. Years ago a 6 ply tire had 6 plys, but since radials were invented the ply rating or load rating just means the plys/cords are just a little thicker each step as you go from SL to C to D to E+. One thing to also consider, with the softer tread rubber on a SL tire it will give better traction than the thicker tires, load range C will also have softer rubber in the tread than the LR E tire. Load range C tends to be almost as soft as the SL tread, though.
@HarrySituations10 ай бұрын
@@daveisnothereI don’t understand how two tires could have the same sidewall but different load ratings. What differentiates the tires at that point?
@daveisnothere10 ай бұрын
@HarrySituations as you go up higher in load rating the cords in the sidewall get wound tighter and tighter, which makes them thinner so they use thicker cord which makes them about the same thickness or slightly thicker overall, but stronger. Eventually, they replace the nylon sidewall cords with steel, but usually that is higher than LR E. There are some minor variations/exceptions to this, but the majority do it this way.
@Fe_lix8 ай бұрын
@@HarrySituations The sidewall should not be the one carrying weight, if you are in this situation the tire would very quickly get dangerously hot at high speed. The air should carry the weight, and it's very simple in principle, the amount of air needed to weight is linear. So now you have 2 possibility to have more air to carry more weight, bigger tires or higher pressure (more air particles in the same volume). So LT or c-metric tires are just tire capable to withstand higher pressure to carry more weight at the same size than a passenger tire. Now, on how to make a tire to resist a higher air pressure there are probably lot of ways and technology that are not only making everything thicker (for exemple, a material more resistant to stretching than another would allow higher pressure at same thickness). Now, on the 4x4 world the combo trend of going for always bigger tires and LT tires means people run tire way to stiff for the weight of their vehicle... So the tire doesn't deform and the only way to have some flex is to run them too low in pressure.
@KINGRG14 ай бұрын
Would SL’s be ok on a 2003 F150 SuperCrew? I don’t tow, but once in a blue moon will haul stuff like a tire changer from shop to shop. My door jam says that the factory tires are P rated 265/70r17. I will go to a 285/70r17 however.
@HarrySituations4 ай бұрын
You should be fine with SL tires.
@calgreco860711 ай бұрын
I wonder about these new XL Rating is that between SL and LT?
@jasonbrushett20056 ай бұрын
That is what I'm running on my truck,it's a good compromise between the two
@AB-10237 ай бұрын
How about a suburban? Vs sharp rocks? Thanks in advance
@pleinairbarnettoutdoors10 ай бұрын
Another mising variable in the LT tire lines. Depends on C,D,E load range. Will affect weight, compliance, bulge when airing down. I have C load in LT, perfect medium
@HarrySituations8 ай бұрын
Yeah these LT tires were Load Range C. The specs on the Standard Load tire (max inflation pressure and max weight) are very similar to most Load Range C tires.
@Scoobienorth Жыл бұрын
I suspected this and I chose c load rated ko2’s for my gladiator, but 37” lighter load rated all terrains are hard to find. I noticed some Of the same things. Better gas mileage , better ride and handling, better traction at times because the sidewalls flex better
@HarrySituations Жыл бұрын
Yeah the KO2s are the only Load Range C 37-inch tire that I know of. I plan to run 35x11.5 Load Range C Nitto Trail Grapplers on my Tundra after this test.
@Scoobienorth Жыл бұрын
@@HarrySituations now if you could put in a word to nitto to make a 37x11.5 snowflake rated tire I’d be stoked.
@HarrySituations Жыл бұрын
@@Scoobienorth I love the 37x11.5 Recon Grapplers on my Ram. No snowflake rating though unfortunately.
@pagodad807911 ай бұрын
Without question the weight of the tire is the reason I go sl with my sluggish Tacoma. On the fence with these tires because they don’t have the 3 peak snow rating I look for. Interesting though that the sl gives you more siping which is a good thing for snow. Nitto doesn’t show that on their website which is a misstep on their part for advertising.
@anthonys3906 Жыл бұрын
What would you guys in the comments recommend for 295/65R20 RTs for a 18 F150? SL or LT. don’t usually haul more than 600 lbs in the bed, never tow, but I do take it on dirt roads and up rock/gravel trails to mt peaks during the summer. NH for environment perspective
@HarrySituations Жыл бұрын
I haven't seen any options in an SL in that size, so that might make a decision for you.
@anthonys3906 Жыл бұрын
@@HarrySituations Makes sense, sometimes tire searching can be a pain so I'm glad I got input from someone. Decision made I guess. Thanks for replying!
@terryhill4732 Жыл бұрын
Light truck tires is all you need if you're not off-road or haul heavy
@wg57685 ай бұрын
You mean Standard Load.
@jamestribol14344 ай бұрын
wow...still kind of a subjective test (minus the data on each tire) for driving. Tacoma's are on the small side so guess the SL would work like you said. I just got Load E tires on my Tundra (did not look closely enough when buying them). They are a heavier tire than the factory ones and noticed lower mpgs. next time I'll go with LT tires...thanks
@jaymoar35615 ай бұрын
Hey were you on a KZbin channel and did a segment called budget overlanding? And you had a 2002 white Tundra?
@HarrySituations4 ай бұрын
Yep! That was on the All Terrain Family channel.
@jaymoar35614 ай бұрын
@@HarrySituations What’s the mileage on your Tundra now? I remember during the video it had 210k.
@HarrySituations4 ай бұрын
@@jaymoar3561 I sold it a couple of years ago at 235k but it is still out there going strong. Now I have a 2006 Double Cab Tundra.
@bernardbausch7851Ай бұрын
Thanks for the great information, have a Gladiator and now I know to SL. Thanks
@damienrubio95854 күн бұрын
Dang, I chose the wrong tires
@terryhutchinson90947 ай бұрын
Now do a video on the different tire pressure requirements between SL and E load rated tires please. I see many people underfilling E load tires based on the vehicle recommended pressure (based on SL load). E rated tires need more pressure for the same load.
@HarrySituations5 ай бұрын
I don’t understand the logic here. Why would an E rated tire need MORE pressure for the same weight?
@terryhutchinson90945 ай бұрын
@@HarrySituations The sidewall is much thicker than an SL rated tire. If allowed to flex too much, it will overheat and in worse case scenarios it could fail. To get the most trouble-free life out of a tire, you should look at the manufactures pressure/load tables. Without exception, to provide the same load support that your vehicle identified on the door jamb with SL tires you will need to pressurize the E rated tires more. Counterintuitive, I know, but true.
@HarrySituations5 ай бұрын
@@terryhutchinson9094I agree that an under inflated tire can overheat and fail, but weight is another part of the equation. In the case of this video the SL tire is rated at 2756 pounds @ 44 psi, and the LT tire is rated at 3750 pounds @ 80 psi. You only need to run it at 80 psi if your vehicle weighs 14,000 pounds. If you run the LT tire, which is stiffer as you noted, at the same 44 psi on the same vehicle I wouldn’t expect the LT tire to flex more than the SL tire.
@terryhutchinson90945 ай бұрын
@@HarrySituations Look at your door jamb - the little label that tells you proper inflation pressure with stock tires. If you look up the stock tire load/pressure table, it will show the weight load that matches the designated pressure. Now use that weight load for the new E rated tires - their table will show a higher pressure for the load.
@HarrySituations5 ай бұрын
@@terryhutchinson9094I’ll be honest if never looked up inflation tables before. Learned something new today, thanks!
@225somewhere Жыл бұрын
This is timely video, thanks! I appreciate that back to back comparison on the same vehicle. I am about to replace the tires on my Tundra and considering a move from p tires to either lt d load or just going to an xl (extra load) passenger tire and maybe moving from a 275/55/20 to a 275/60/20 as that weight change is only a couple of pounds, depending on brand, staying more or less around 45 lbs a tire. I am really wondering if that little of a size and weight increase would create any substantial negative impact on performance, especially if I am staying with a tire that does not add more than a couple pounds to the tire weight? On a note as I have looked at tire weights, there is a large difference between brands. Toyo at3 for example in a 275/55/20 lt e load tire is showing 50 lbs, verses say cooper at3 lt e load in the same size is 55 lbs. I have noticed across the board, Toyo is generally much lighter compared to most tires. Makes me wonder about the construction. Is Toyo using that much better quality material or construction and building a better tire even though it weighs less or is the cooper and others that weight more, actually a more robust tire by possibly having more material in the tire? Just brings up a lot of questions when you go to considering the weight of different tires across brands.
@HarrySituations Жыл бұрын
You are asking all the right questions! Personally I would go with the XL tires. Any added height and weight is going to impact performance, but a smaller difference will likely be almost unnoticeable. Regarding Toyo, in my experience they are very durable, but I agree with the logic that a heavier time by it’s nature has more material in it and will be tougher. I guess it comes down to whether that “tougher” is necessary or not, which can be a really hard thing to quantify.
@225somewhere Жыл бұрын
Thanks! For sure, difficult to determine how tough is really needed.
@97clubcar6 ай бұрын
Have a question. I have a 2024 Ram rebel and looking to go bigger then stock. I found some with a C rating and a E rating. Which one will I b Need for the rebel. Mostly highway driving
@HarrySituations5 ай бұрын
I would go with the Cs. They should provide a better ride and increased mileage.
@theforestisdark96764 ай бұрын
All I can find are LT tires what brands or A/T are standard load ? Can't seem to find any
@HarrySituations4 ай бұрын
What size are you looking for?
@theforestisdark96764 ай бұрын
@@HarrySituations 265/70/17 or 270/65/17
@HarrySituations4 ай бұрын
@@theforestisdark9676 Nitto makes an SL Terra Grappler in that size.
@tommiddleton63986 ай бұрын
Definitely what I was looking for to clarify the actual difference in feel from SL vs LT/E rated tires. Thanks!
@sullivan91917 ай бұрын
Thank you for this! Surprised at how little information on load rating is out there when it’s probably the most important aspect to consider when buying AT tires. For my daily driven Taco the SL makes way more sense than even a C load.
@tjabaley3 ай бұрын
Excellent breakdown. Think I’m going sl on my next JK tires.
@vr-tl9uh27 ай бұрын
What would you recommend for a 1500 Silverado z71? Don’t tow much more than 1000 lbs at most a few times a year but do go off road at times in the desert and forest. Currently have hard metric tires but wondering if the LT would be worth the peace of mind.
@handsolo6241 Жыл бұрын
Never even considered buying non l.t. tires. I never tow/haul much any more. My truck rides like crap..
@HarrySituations Жыл бұрын
I was shocked at the difference in ride quality. I don't think I will put LT tires on a midsize vehicle again if I can avoid it.
@robbanks7393 Жыл бұрын
When say Standard Load, do you mean c and d or just c?
@AllTerrainFamily Жыл бұрын
@@robbanks7393 It depends on the tire brand. Nitto doesn't label these LT, but they are comparable in spec to LT Load Range C from other brands, Nitto calls them 285/70 R17 116T.
@chriscogsdell68054 ай бұрын
Ok call me dumb but I'm confused. I'm trying to figure out what I need for a 2019 Chevy Z71 crew cab a SL or LT
@royportalise52693 ай бұрын
Hi. Are those 4Runner wheels 🛞?
@HarrySituations2 ай бұрын
Correct
@sueneilson8966 ай бұрын
Use SL Hankook ATs here on Australian outback unpaved roads and tracks. Definitely have a few more punctures, but the very cushy ride , sand driving ability and better fuel economy/range make this the better choice. The LTs are good for extreme rocks and sharp roots, but SLs much better everywhere else. Carry 2 spares to even the odds.
@bowtech9411 ай бұрын
I have a 2019 Ram Rebel, that came with LT 275 70 18 tires. I’m looking at recon grapplers and just want to buy the same tire size. Should I go with the “LT”
@vr-tl9uh210 ай бұрын
You’ll have to buy the LT tire since your truck came with LT tires. Now if your truck came with factory SL tires, you would have the option for either one. This is due to sidewall flex as the LT will flex much less than an SL. Since your truck came with the LT tire they designed the handling with that additional stiffness in mind. A good tire shop would not install the SL on your truck for safety reasons.
@Mike-454711 ай бұрын
Thank you for the video. You answered 98% of my questions in just a few minutes. The 2% is which one do you recommend for snow and rain. I live in FL so I need something for the rain especially on the Hwy and I go skiing in Upstate NY so that’s the snow part. Thanks again plus I just sub.
@MrBsu1398111 ай бұрын
Thank you for helping me understand better!
@ddoghunt3471 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video. Backs up everything that makes sense to me. This is the exact direction I plan to go with the Yokohama, I believe they offered both?
@adam6ism6 ай бұрын
Is that an Australian blue healer?
@HarrySituations5 ай бұрын
He is what they call a Texas Healer. His mom is a blue tick and his dad is an Aussie.
@WalkerTexasplumber7 ай бұрын
Would I need the LT or SL for a 22 f150 ? Thanks
@hotcoater2 ай бұрын
This was a great video!
@pedrodiaz47644 ай бұрын
Great video, just learned a lot with this. Thanks
@juancervantes70212 ай бұрын
What about for a Chevy Trail Boss?
@MikeR55Ай бұрын
XL or C load rated
@Nonsensenoalph8 ай бұрын
The actual tread lug pattern is different also
@anthonybusellato69557 ай бұрын
Great video! Engaging, straightforward, and I can tell you changed your own mind. Thank you!
@paulharsh78 Жыл бұрын
One question? I have a 14 tundra on LT’s should you run higher pressures than the recommended in the sticker? Also definitely getting SL next time. Don’t go off road, or tow, so 1-2mpg sounds great!
@erice4611 Жыл бұрын
Yes probably 40psi for street.
@timsanchez2860 Жыл бұрын
Excellent info HW! Just about to make the decision for @vansherpa 170 4WD Sprinter and I am thinking hard about the NITTO LT … love your work!
@adrianw3985 Жыл бұрын
Interesting test. I run KO2's on my Tacoma. BFG KO2's only come in LT ratings. I had a choice between C or E rated. In the past I ran E rated because shit happens in Arizona with all the sharp rocks, but recently I tried the C rated. I don't notice a significant difference.
@HarrySituations Жыл бұрын
That surprises me to hear. I think there is a reason Toyota puts P Metric tires on Tacomas and Jeep puts C load range tires on Wranglers.
@jeffreybetts8014 Жыл бұрын
I love my nitto tires a lot, but, I put E rated 35s on my 2dr JL Rubicon and it rides terrible, I will be going back to a C rated or standard rated tire when these wear out. There aren’t very many oversized comfortable tires out there for lightweight vehicles like Jeeps.
@HarrySituations Жыл бұрын
Nitto makes a Trail Grappler in a 35x11.50R17 in a Load Range C that I am a big fan of. Worth considering for your next tires.
@JerichoRally3 ай бұрын
9:37 both are LT tires
@daveisnothere21 күн бұрын
HAHA!! That's hilarious...the One he called an LT is also way too much tire for the Tacoma as well. a Load Range C is what it needs, not SL or LR E.
@leventbuda229414 күн бұрын
Sl load tires are better than lt load tires for Rubicon ıf I undertand good. 😀.
@VieweronYouTube11 ай бұрын
Nicely done!
@sailingradmode9473 Жыл бұрын
Excellent breakdown! I totally agree with your conclusions. 👍
@davep4610 Жыл бұрын
Great video
@wasachevyguy Жыл бұрын
Load range D for me! Best of both worlds for my Tundra!
@KINGRG14 ай бұрын
Tundra guys love the D!!
@larryparson96094 ай бұрын
Interesting thanks
@markzimmerman9576 Жыл бұрын
Some good info.
@user-hf8ie8mf3n4 ай бұрын
I use SL ridge grapplers on my 4Runners and they’ve been great. No rock crawling, but it handles basic overland stuff nicely. Good vid. 👍🤪🏳️🌈
@NoLies176 ай бұрын
Yup. Just wish there were some sub-50lb 33" all-terrain pizza cutters out there.
@HarrySituations5 ай бұрын
Me too!
@-KERION- Жыл бұрын
Estaba viendo el directo de spiderman 2 de vegetta 777 cap 2 y me quede dormido y acabe aqui😂
@Auzzybear32 Жыл бұрын
You better not put no load range c tires on your tundra!
@HarrySituations Жыл бұрын
Why not???
@ryansmith7974 Жыл бұрын
P rated Cooper 4s on my Tundra, in the 18" narrow spare size. Gas is $8 bucks a gallon where I live...sometimes more.
@angusmackaskill3035 Жыл бұрын
About $1000.
@Jim-s6i3b3 ай бұрын
Wasn’t impressed with is video. Very basic and seemed to show a lack of knowledge about off-roading in regards to tires.
@jeffwolf8018 Жыл бұрын
Oh my God how many times can you say tire in a short video. It's starting to give me a headache. A tip for future videos don't keep repeating one word a million times. We all know it's SL or LT you don't have to keep throwing tire in on everything you say
@AJ-qn6gd Жыл бұрын
He mentions tyres a lot in a video about tyres 🤔🇬🇧
@kevinstarski1598 Жыл бұрын
Looks like you got tired of hearing about tires 🙂
@WASHINGTONSTATEDOGTRAINER Жыл бұрын
Great job Love this video help me considerably thank you