Chewed balls for smoothbore flintlocks

[@BadlanderOutsider]

I'll be honest; I've never heard of chewed balls before and I've been shooting for a fair while. So it's great to see something I've not heard of before and a demonstration of them.

[@badgerrrlattin35]

Ditto for me. Long time gun guy but never heard of "chewed balls" till about a month ago on the net.

[@ronschannel5409]

Thanks for getting me interested in black powder guns again. They are a big part of American history and seems like a great hobby.

[@northernwoodsman]

Probably one of the only people ive seen on youtube say Fusil de chasse correctly. Also good video.

[@64gunner1]

I very much enjoy all your videos Mike and always look forward to learning a bit history!

[@halhunter1974]

Mike, I was beginning to think you had lost it until you finally explained your loading sequence. Your explanation makes good sense.

[@Bruckzone60]

For what it's worth, my favorite 20 ga smooth bore loading recipe is powder followed by veg fiber wadd soaked in peanut oil followed by chewed .610 ball. If the friction fit is not enough to hold the ball I split some of the wadd and use a thin slice on top of the ball. I only use this at the range or on trail walk shoots where I am keeping the muzzle up till shooting, not for a hunting setting where the muzzle will be in many up down positions. This gives me very good accuracy and keeps the fouling at bay for all day shooting plus easy cleaning. Tried olive oil but it goes bad after a while. Also coconut oil works well. And peanut and coconut oils smell good too. I'm using 80 grains of 2ff that works well but I will have to try going up to see if I get the same results you did Mike. Thanks again for all the insights, teaching, and entertainment.

[@grendelgrendelsson5493]

That was a really interesting video and congratulations on your fortitude in the cold! Once the surgery on my spine has healed I'll be at the range testing chewed balls. I remember a reference made to them in an archaeological programme where an Independence War era house/hospital was dug and one was found. They thought a soldier had bitten it whilst having a bit of himself removed. I would have thought something softer would have been better!

[@oldguy85308]

Golf balls are made with dimples to make them more aerodynamic. I have no idea what a lead ball looks like after a hot gas explosion. Thanks duelist1954. Good demonstration.

[@hamm6035]

Mike I will agree with the sight issue. I believe repeating the test with a smooth bore with a full set of sights will have the same end results just smaller groups. Can't wait to see the video. Stay warm.

[@charlescomly1]

Great seeing you on the range again, I'm thinking shooting now and then while building your rifle helps with stress. Thanks for the video Mike!

[@ResistTheNonsense]

I know. I know. Sometimes you just have to shoot with bare balls.

[@douglasmaccullagh1267]

Mike, I am very interested in learning to shoot my Fowler the way they were shot. I learn a lot from you - thanks. As for NSSA's comment, I am not surprised that there is more to it, such as load development, than just the surface texture of the ball. In a different subject, I now have an Uberti 1851 Navy to learn to shoot, too.

[@Glenfilthie1]

Yes! Keep working at it Mike, I want to see that beast shoot! Hope you're back at Duelist's Den soon too. :)

[@davidcudlip6587]

That's one well tuned lock.

[@richstone2627]

You got better groups with the smooth balls. Fusil De Chasse is still my favorite of the smoothbores.

[@winterhorse290]

Mine is an old Northwest trade gun. Built it from one of Curly's "kits" basically a box of parts and a piece of wood that "kind of" looks like a gunstock.

[@redsky8509]

Always learning from you, thank you.

[@winterhorse290]

I roll my .61s to get them perfectly round in an old dryer with the paddles remove.. Look like a factory swaged ball. THEN I roll them between two horseshoe rasp. More aggressive "teeth marks" and ball needs no wadding and work like fouling scratches. Accuracy is on par with rifles out to 75 yards. Doubt? Ask the people I shot against.

[@stevelavalette6898]

Love your vids Mike ! Not gonna lie though. Chewed Balls did make me chuckle.

[@foxnoodles2458]

Really informative video. Gave a like for all the weather you had to endure.

[@Captain-Electro]

This makes me think about my golf ball cannon. I have not fired it over a great distance, but I have fired a 1lb lead ball , a golf ball and a handful of marbles out of it... I have to say the marbles are the most accurate being it has a smooth bore and no sights.

[@tyrssen1]

And if you've ever had chewed balls, ya know how painful that can be! (With apologies to Mike, and to TV movie host "The Ghoul..")

[@chosenrifleman7133]

I have used dimpled balls in my Ardesa Old Ironside .69 Naval Cannon and found the consistency to be much improved over smooth balls shooting over 25yds.

[@kirkboswell2575]

I don't know about accuracy, but dimpling on a golf ball significantly increases distance traveled.

[@duke927]

I agree. But of course distance is desired in a golf ball and accuracy is a function of body mechanics to the clubhead. I don't see how it would matter with the velocities and distance to the target in a smoothbore firearm. He may need to adjust the charge for the chewed balls to re acquire accuracy. Now with the chewed balls accuracy may improve at greater distances with the golf ball dimpling effect. I thought of golf balls the first thing.

[@jjohnston94]

Golf balls spin, and the dimples amplify the aerodynamic effects of the spin. A proper golf shot has backspin, which produces lift, which increases distance. A bad golf shot has sidespin, which gives you the classic slice. Dimples have no effect on non-spinning smoothbore balls. If there's any accuracy gain to be had, it's probably just that the dimpling process from the modern tool increases uniformity.

[@james_lessick892]

Very informative, gonna try it myself with out a patch on the ball.

[@johngallagher2313]

Interesting. One thing I noticed is your ignition seemed instant. Impressive for a flintlock at least it impressed me.

[@randytricker8585]

And the flash of the priming powder was next to nothing

[@randytricker8585]

Wich helps with the flinch lock syndrome.

[@wrxs1781]

A good information video, and the results I feel are representative of the average shooter. For accuracy and velocity a patched spit ball is hard to beat.

[@mr.thickey1820]

"Ach du lieber, mein freund", we must always remember to put on our "big boy pants" when talking about muzzleloading! After all, we are all "brothers in da balls" aren't we???!!! Pardon the "course jesting" but I just had to get that off my chest! Always wonderful to watch your videos. Now go on & have a "ball" for yourself!

[@1717jbs]

This is dedication! Looking forward to those smoothbore techniques. Thanks Mike. I'm guessing that you were the only one there at the range. ;-)

[@dadsausmchero]

Have you ever used Sheeps wool for wadding?

[@billbearback2591]

chewed balls LOL, im a bit slow on the uptake , it took a couple o sec's to register , then i was chuckling like a fool , i have a son in 8th grade and its exactly what i would expect from him , cheers big ears

[@lonestarprepper0156]

Thanks for this vid. Saved alot of us the freezing effort. Think no wad between ball and powder on cap and ball revolver would just as or more accurate than using the wad? Rifling negate ant difference?

[@rre9121]

That range has great acoustics.

[@direktorpresident]

Since the purpose of dimpling on golf balls is to provide "lift", and then only with a projectile spinning against the direction of travel, it seems obvious that any deformity on the face of a projectile will adversely affect accuracy and increase drag.

[@randytricker8585]

I never heard of putting the patch after the ball very interesting

[@bryco32]

Well you don't have to worry about this video getting age restricted. KZbin has no issue with people playing with their balls on the platform.

[@ksingleton101]

Shooting them might be a different way to look at them! KZbin too!

[@juliandotcom8126]

If u look at it the wrong way

[@mtodd4723]

Good luck on the next round of tests . I enjoy these videos I learn a little with each one . With your hurt shoulder why do you not use a padded stock or shoulder pad ?

[@greggwoods7173]

I wonder what long term use of chewed balls does to the smooth bore barrel? I also noticed the almost instantaneous ignition as well and wondered about it.. Good video Mike.. Take care of that shoulder...

[@mannys9130]

Gregg Woods Lead is so soft I doubt it has any effect on the barrel compared to a smooth ball.

[@carls.6746]

I'm still looking around into flintlocks but I think the wadding instead of a patch is what is causing the inaccuracy. Think of smoke falling on a smooth surface and it's distribution over that surface is pretty even, now think of that smoke falling on a rough surface and the smoke isn't very evenly distributed over the surface like fog in the mountains. With a regular patch it may be more accurate due to the patch creating a smoother surface for the gasses to surround. Just my thinking but correct me if I'm wrong.

[@sanfordhoffman2392]

Doesn’t the dimples on a golf ball make it more stable in flight? If so, i don’t see why this wouldn’t work.

[@pikeywyatt]

try shooting a golf ball out of a musket

[@ksingleton101]

It's been done, watch Demolition Ranch.

[@ksingleton101]

I don't think the way he was making them was leaving the ball round. I'd like to see him use a micrometer on his balls, his lead balls.

[@linasmagnum]

dimples on golf balls are for aerodynamics, somehow they make them fly faster and farther

[@edmundschwartzadder5360]

No consistent spin

[@Lanttyrantis]

Fascinating video to watch. Thanks for producing it!

[@CAPTIVEPULSEMAKER]

....good video. Thanks again

[@caseyc6195]

I am curious, what is the point of the wad over the ball? Is the ball a bit smaller than the bore, and the wad is so the ball doesn't shift?

[@duelist1954]

Yup. You've got it.

[@georgeholt8929]

I'm a bit old fashioned as I like using the Goex data as they publish, 2F powder is for 50 caliber at 60 grains or less. 3F is for 45 caliber or smaller. Where as 1F is for 50 caliber with a powder charge of 70 grains or more and with any caliber larger. In the days gone by, 1F was also known as Government powder. In a smooth bore of 20 gauge or larger 1F powder is correct. The larger powder granules actually have a reduction to the recoil without affecting ball velocity. You should try to recover a fired round ball into a ballistic bullet recovery tube that is filled with rolled surgical cotton so as to determine if the balls are obstulating in the bores and picking up the rifling and becoming sealed in the barrels riflings, with 90 grains or greater amounts of powder this should be happening. As a side note the Government load for Frankfort Armory 45-70 was with 1F powder. Golf balls are covered with a relatively soft covering after the inner core is wrapped with a long rubber band, the club smacks the outer skin thus allowing a grip of the balls outer skin to flex the inner core also flexes thus the golfers arms are not being subjected to the shock wave of having to strike a solid ball. But original smooth golf balls were more dense and had a tendency of glancing off of a wood iron face. So you shouldn't compare lead round balls chewed to golf balls. Perhaps a rough cast Cannon ball would be better. Otherwise a nice video.

[@folday6169]

Mike, what about taking balls and simply rolling them around on a piece of coarse-grained sandpaper, with a little pressure applied by the palm of the hand?

[@jj-ve9wy]

Mike, again, thanks for doing so much of our homework. I was wondering if you had heard anything from the NSSA , in regards to loading and smoothbore accuracy, since posting this video?

[@duelist1954]

An earful. It seems that they lube them with liquid Alox. They all swear to great results.

[@jj-ve9wy]

Interesting, looking forward to seeing how this develops. Thanks for taking the time to reply.

[@johnathonpease780]

Ive had a idea but never had the fowler to do it with how about cutting out rifle slugs from a 20 guage an seeing the results

[@deej9367]

I always thought the reason for chewed balls was so the ball made contact with the bore while being shot to improve accuracy

[@stevensheldon9271]

It is. It is a windage eater.

[@NemoVir]

Not to disparage the maker, but I think it's suppose to look more like a golf ball than a disco ball.

[@ksingleton101]

I wonder what a 4 second vs 10 second ball looks like?

[@winterhorse290]

It works. Horse hoof rasp work for me.

[@theol3199]

Chewed balls hurt and are prone to swelling

[@mannys9130]

theol31 Mike warned us about those 8th grader viewers...

[@theol3199]

mannys9130 I couldn't, sorry

[@BigD-jc6rj]

Growing OLD is inevitable. Growing UP is optional. Hickok45 addressed a similar issue up front on his colt dragoon video, with the phrase “ball grease.”

[@thendnjedi1388]

Reason why i like mike, what he said beginning of the video

[@williamkoppos7039]

I stopped doing that when one of them came around the barn and damn near hit me in the head.

[@deandeann1541]

I wonder if an accuracy difference will be apparent with patched chewed balls at longer range ie 50-75 yards?

[@WalrusWinking]

Does it have the same flight characteristics of a golf ball?

[@Munkylaw]

Are there rifled projectiles like there are with shotgun slugs?

[@lawrencestanley8989]

So, I wonder if you could make chewed balls easily by putting a handful of them in a vibratory case tumbler and let them slam into one another for a day or two?

[@bills6093]

Well, as noted, they dimple golf balls for a reason. Mythbusters show noted a good effect on fuel economy from dimpling a car body. So it seems likely that if you dimple a musket ball like a golf ball, it will probably result in higher velocity downrange.

[@DonHavjuan]

And yet, modern high speed rifle projectiles are not dimpled. Consider why.

[@bills6093]

I haven't seen any such testing, though. It could be that dimples are effective with lower velocity rounds, and ineffective with high velocity rounds. Or not.

[@therugburnz]

If it were golfballike, it would go farther in a volley fire situation. I'm unclear if accuracy is affected.

[@ilfarmboy]

Wonder what would happen if you do powder patch then ball. Both kinds

[@joelopezjl28]

*for those of you still in the 8th grade* killed me haha

[@knobnosterknapper]

Test request. To my mind these should offer less drag than a standard roundball much the way a dimpled golf ball does over a smooth one. I would be curious to see these shot out of one of your rifles side by side with the roundballs and see if they impact higher due to less drag. Keep up the great work!

[@MrLM002]

Any of y'all know of any modern smoothbore muzzleloaders that are currently in production? Like ones with a synthetic stock.

[@ToreDL87]

.... eh???

[@martykitson3442]

Been a while since I've seen one but sportsman's warehouse used to carry a Hawkins style stainless steel cap and ball with a laminated stock but that was a rifled barrel

[@NW_Ranger]

What is the point in that? Just get a modern cartridge shooting firearm.

[@chetyoder]

Mmmm? as a golfer I can tell ya any spin is going to change the trajectory, even tho you had a smooth bore the wad (blanket) gots to maybe snag a little and spin the ball , I have a old Herters mold that leaves a proud spur which I sand down while watching youtube vids, works good , but use corrugated cardboard (punch cut) for a over ball wad , I can hold a 5" group at 50yds with a DP mortimer fowler , luv it

[@hawkenrifles]

Hola Mike. Un video muy bueno. Saludos desde España.

[@taylorman1949]

Whats the purpose of the wad? and no lube?

[@nakoawarrior3186]

I'll say this 70-80 grains is enough for a smooth bore. Because after 60 yards the pattern is too big for good kill shot placement. Your gun might be different. good video

[@anibalgonzalez9774]

Sir I want to know i have a shotgun. 410 conberte on massolauoter I want to know waht cal I had to use 45 oh smaller please can you tell me Im Sgt A Gonzalez from P.R.but i live in fitchburg massachusett if you can help il thankyou for it sir

[@highgrove8545]

Maybe the reason they chewed the musket balls was to decrease the diameter of the ball when they are oversized for the musket? The oval shape might have added some accuracy, similar to an American football.

[@duaneaubuchon9453]

Thank you ill give it a try

[@cindycressler1239]

I also stoped using chewed balls . Never got the accuracy’s as with plain bare balls with tow on top

[@thetruth3290]

that was not in my head until you put it there

[@TheMagnumChannel]

So would you put patches after the ball in a rifle, like a Hawken?

[@NW_Ranger]

No. Seat the rifle ball in a cloth patch.

[@tnzayatz6579]

Unless I’m really wrong, powder,ball, was was the way military smoothbores were historically loaded.

[@FerociousSniper]

Makes sense. Think of the dimples in a golf ball.

[@Blackbart5118]

Interesting video! I'm amazed at the almost instant ignition you're getting from that fowler. There seems to be no discernible "click, whoosh, bang" that one gets from many flintlocks.

[@darrellgoodman9585]

What size roundball would you use for a TC New Englander 12ga ml.

[@ericlarson7212]

12 gauge is right there at .72 caliber.

[@MrPolecat]

The traditional fusil has no rear sight, right? How much of it do you think was the inherent accuracy of the gun/balls, and how much do you think was the sights keeping you from taking advantage of that inherent accuracy? I am not sure I trust all that wind, either. :3

[@MrPolecat]

Aha, I posted that before the video was over, haha. Looking forward to seeing how your further research goes!

[@donaldrhea1414]

Wonder if hornets nest wading would work or would it be better for shot loads.

[@mikeseigel6566]

Mike, how did you make the spout for your black powder can (appears to be a 30-06 case soldered to the metal can lid)?

[@djay6651]

Steve has come a long way from doing chainmail by hand.

[@reneguenther2832]

Couldn't you put more than one ball in the block at a time?

[@ellismidkiff6117]

Rene Guenther no

[@johnboy454]

One more thing to remember, don't put more than one of any size ball in the base. They tend to stick together and fly everywhere!!

[@josephbarnes8000]

Great video. Seems to me just hitting the paper at 50 yards is exceptionally good shooting. I am like you not enough difference to go through any extra effort to shoot chewed balls.

[@AYoutubeAccountName]

I would assume that as many other comments have pointed out it's like the dimpling on a golf ball. Though this is made for distance as far as I know, rather than accuracy, so while this was an interesting test it would be better if you were shooting at a longer range I'd have thought. By which i mean you'd expect less bullet drop.

[@mikeprell2747]

If your loading method works for smooth bore, will it work with a rifled barrel using w/ roundball?

[@cdawson198600]

I wonder if it could also improve cavitation.

[@wildermanoutdoors8485]

Would it be possible (and safe) to do the first load in this video with a smooth bare ball that is .600? I also have a .20 gauge fowler.

[@duelist1954]

Yes it would

[@wildermanoutdoors8485]

@@duelist1954 Thank you!

[@johnstacy7902]

My guess is the chewed balls wouldn't load faster as they wouldnt necessarily require wadding or a patch.

[@joelopezjl28]

Also can you use 20gauge fiber wads or no?

[@skepticalbadger]

The other claims are that they were chewed to make them more painful/damaging (this was thought to be true), or that found chewed balls were used in amputations. In reality many have been chewed by animals later on. There is no evidence that anyone thought that chewing them made them more accurate. Oh, and no evidence that this is where "bite the bullet" came from either, before anyone says it. Edit, that phrase is probably from biting on bullets during corporal punishment.

[@southerncountryboy8]

wait, why put a wad over the round ball? why not under the round ball? I know with shot, you put a wad on top to keep it from rolling out. But this is a single ball, can someone please explain?

[@duelist1954]

This is a smoothbore loaded with balls that are 0.005" under bore diameter. Without a wad they would roll out.

[@MrPatriotOne]

The problem is the balls have to really be chewed, not ran a machine. By the time you get done chewing them for real you'll make ever shot count LOL

[@robaldridge6505]

you could try changing your top wadding material, something is not working..

[@Texican-1836]

Does it remove lead from the ball?

[@duelist1954]

No

[@keyote3]

Okay, I have never seen this rough coat ball method before in the U.K. I have a smoothbore 50cal Hawken replica, what ball mould would you recommend, and what about this roughed up method on that size ball...???? I feel that my ball mould is a tad small perhaps...!!!

[@duelist1954]

.490 to .495 should work. You can lube the ball with liquid alox

[@keyote3]

Thanks for the heads up, I am using a .495 mould, but use a thin patch sometimes with about 65 grains powder. Dependent on how much I have really, sometimes as little as 55 grains. It is much more awkward to get any over here as far as the boys in blue are concerned. It is not exactly cheap either, one expects it is to minimise usage by the general public...... enjoyed this clip though, excellent sound as well despite the wind...

[@benstolen2060]

Either way, your cleaning my clock at 50 yards. A deer would hafta play pro catcher for me to hit a paper plate at 50. I’m off to the range for more science!

[@greenwave819]

it does seem that if it works for golf balls it would work for a musket. I would expect 10% or more accuracy+range

[@billwessels207]

Golf balls are dimpled to increase range and accuracy. Perhaps there is something to it for black powder enthusiasts.

[@pikeywyatt]

there is hope for me and my smooth-bore Baker.

[@99dsm1]

tony Wyatt didn't know bakers came in a smooth bore version

[@rwdyeriii]

The baker didn't come in smoothbore, but the reproductions are all smoothbore.

[@99dsm1]

rw mine is not

[@rwdyeriii]

Christopher Hess is your Baker one of the ones that The Rifle Shop made several years ago? I ask because theirs are the only ones I've ever heard of being actual close to original repros with a rifled barrel.

[@99dsm1]

It was a rifle shop gun made about 2 years ago IIRC

[@siestatime4638]

You introduced two variables (patches and bullets); so which were you testing? You should have tested one or the other.

[@ammarchetta]

Siesta Time ??? he used the same wadding for smooth and dimpled. The only variable was he type of ball. And the wind of course

[@roderickballance6960]

Well, you’d scare the blazes off those English Interlopers Along New France’s frontier !

[@loquat4440]

I will qualify myself as not knowing a lot about smooth bore muzzle loaders. I think you should repeat that test with very tightly patched balls. I have always had people tell me that a tightly patched smooth bore was more accurate. The military forces of the world did load loosely more as a matter of increased reloading speed as one line of standing soldiers fired into another standing group of soldiers. Dimpled balls: The increase of accuracy is supposed to happen once in flight. Likely going down the barrel unpatched might not be the most accurate way of loading.

[@never2late454]

I've heard long ago that native Americans use to chew led shot to make rounds. But never seen this before.