Dumb Starbucks Founder: I'm a Fan of Real Starbucks

[@tredlow]

"What does success mean if the road that got you there is paved with broken hearts? They say that the devil is an artist. And if that's so, then maybe I was his greatest piece yet." - Nathan Fielder

[@Seth__Roach]

Oh, Nathan. Can't wait to see the inside story of this on his show.

[@shootjr]

In case you're new here... This is Nathan Fielder and he has a show called Nathan for You on comedy central. This will be on Season 2 premiering this summer.

[@raxino774]

Well that's how normally nathan talk

[@geraldogalliani2474]

Wow, what a smart guy!, "PARODY" is legal in the USA. I tried to buy a franchise of Starbucks back in 2010; fucking clowns wanted 1.8 millions and 10% of annual revenues, just to use the freaking name. May be now I can open a "Crazy Starbucks Coffee". Thank you Nathan! This is going to open a pandora's box. We are going to star seeing "Dumb Mcdonalds", "Ghetto Walmarts" , " Silly Walgreens" Wow, this is huge!!!!!

[@bluecollarmenproductions]

Ghetto Walmart is just Walmart lol

[@yousorooo]

This is so damn hilarious

[@erinmurphy6993]

No, Starbuck's isn't the cheapest most low grade. Seattle's Best is the lowest grade and is also owned and distributed by? You, guessed it "Starbuck's"! While parody is legal in the U.S. as soon as he starts making a decent profit off of this he will have a serious lawsuit on his hands. If he is smart he will change the name after the first quarters profits and give the proceeds to charity. Using minimal requirements to invalidate copyright laws is like playing Russian roulette you have about a 50/50 chance of the law going in your favor, which is really not good odds for either bullets or multi-million dollar lawsuits.

[@santiagoeguia7127]

Wow i know tgat guy!!!xP hes on conedy central, he failed college and made a comedy show like said, on comedy central. I forgot his name but hes funny as hell

[@Thek0easy]

He's surprisingly optimistic. I think Starbucks will take legal actions against them. The owner is so full of himself, thinking he found a loophole with his "parody law".

[@blackghost10sg]

no way. this guy wants Starbucks to do something to his shop. he can always change the name as long as he can make a name for himself. by far, he did well, and if Starbucks really take legal actions against him, then he will be on every news and papers or internet. so he is smart, there is no way he can lose on this.

[@super5tar1111]

@@blackghost10sg Yeah, he also said Starbucks runs the risk of losing him as a customer, so there's that two if they're smart. i don't see what the big deal is, he just wants to use this to become really rich and to make money

[@super5tar1111]

also, nathan's a smart guy he did extensive research on parody law so he knows what he's doing (he looked it up on wikipedia)

[@bluecollarmenproductions]

He went to college