Sigma 14-24mm F2.8 DN (Sony FE) Review | 4K

[@phucmapvlog]

Two different creators mentioned a dust issue with this lens (similar to the Sigma 24-70). Have you experienced that at all?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I haven't, but remember that I am typically using short term loaners, so it often isn't long enough for those kinds of problems to manifest.

[@pumpingiron1975]

Thank you! - One of few I trust in reviews.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's great feedback.

[@mmughal]

I couldnt agree more

[@boiga1966]

Agree

[@eViperRabbit]

Great review - unbiased, concise and informative. Appreciate the effort!!!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

You're welcome.

[@eViperRabbit]

@@DustinAbbottTWI I am from Singapore. The price of the Sigma (US$1,200) and Tamron ($1,030) is only US$170 difference. Given the close price proximity, would Sigma be a better buy and value than the Tamron?

[@rodaempat1223]

@@eViperRabbit where do you buy, can u share the shop or marketplace?

[@eViperRabbit]

Rodaempat you can get it from any major camera shop. 1. TK Foto at Funan Mall or Plaza Singapura 2. Cathay Photo at Peninsula Plaza. Price around SGD1640 the last time I asked. Funan Mall and Peninsula Plaza are about 300m apart.

[@rodaempat1223]

@@eViperRabbit thank you, u must go with sigma then.. wider+

[@davidburchettephotography6513]

Thank you so much for taking a look at the len’s performance in astrophotography! Info much appreciated!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

You're welcome.

[@petripuurunen]

When ever you are buying lenses - check Dustin`s review first! Thanks again for great indepth-review.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thanks for the vote of confidence!

[@longrider9551]

Hands down best review channel on youtube

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's very kind. Thank you!

[@KetansaCreatesArt]

I discovered one thing about this Sigma E mount lens. Even if it zooms, it is still a block lens/prime lens. Because when you dial the zoom, the whole assemby moves back and forth. From front to back, the elements never separate from eachother 😎

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's interesting. The elements move in concert, you're saying?

[@KetansaCreatesArt]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Yes, you will see the back element moving forward, which never happens in most of the lenses. Like moving away the concert from audience to create a hall effect 🤓

[@desertbornproductions]

Dustin thanks for this review. I am so close to buying this lens but am looking for the best possible lens for low light event photography for the mirrorless Sony system (dance floor wedding pics etc). Think it would hold up and focus quickly without hunting? Have issues with that on the Tamron 28-75mm.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I don't think the lens focuses better than the 28-75, but I've had good success with the Tamron. If the lighting is low enough that an F2.8 aperture is the limiting principle, you might need to switch to a prime with a wider maximum aperture.

[@STACYBURK]

If you're an outdoor elopement photographer, would you get the Sigma 14-24 2.8 lens... or spend the extra money for the GM 12-24 2.8 lens?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I haven’t tested the GM lens, but frankly I’ve found few practical applications for 12mm, myself. I own a 12mm lens and almost never reach for it.

[@STACYBURK]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Thanks 😊

[@davemckenna4188]

Nice photos of downtown Indianapolis. Do you come here often?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Not often, but I was there for a conference.

[@astrosecretfiles]

@Dustin Abbot what about protection of the lens? I usually put filters IN FRONT to protect the lens, but here is not possible. How can you protect it, since is 1500 lens to me is VERY important...

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

You have to rely on the integrated lens hood for protection; there are no front protection options outside of that. I've owned/own a number of lenses like this, however, and have never had a problem

[@mlentsch]

Thanks, Dustin, but no mention of the native Sony 12-24?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I did mention it, but I didn't draw extensive comparisons because I have never used that lens. Furthermore, an F4 lens is not an F2.8 lens; people use such lenses differently.

[@sandb1867]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Not so. As an owner of the 12-24G, I'm considering switching to the Sigma 14-24.

[@RM-hy4so]

Dustin, how does this compares to the Sony 16-35 2.8 GM for sharpness? thanks!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I haven't used the Sony yet, so I can't comment.

[@t0bias283]

Is the video footage at 9:55 out of camera or stabilized with some software?

[@t0bias283]

And with which focal length was it recording?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Just in body image stabilization. That was somewhere around 14-15mm

[@t0bias283]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Thanks

[@BoredErica]

35mm 1.2 would be really interesting. In PhillipReeve's review, the 40mm 1.4 is better corrected and has really good coma performance. Might make sense to have a 40mm Sigma and a 40mm Batis for travel and the close focus making it versatile for travel.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

The 40mm Batis is interesting, and I think Tamron will soon have an also interesting option if you want to travel light. Stay tuned...

[@RatherBDiving1]

Thanks for your thorough review. I’m eager to see your review of the Sigma E-Mount 24-70 f2.8 when it becomes available. I’m glad that more quality third party options are becoming available for the Sony E-Mount.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

For sure. From what I understand the 24-70 is more of a development announcement and won't be around until next spring. We'll see.

[@mordbain4671]

​@@DustinAbbottTWI Happily it should be coming out quite soon, the official Sigma announcement page stated "The Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN Art will be available in L-mount and Sony E-mount in mid-November 2019 through authorized US dealers. Pricing will be announced at a later date. "

[@MattTrevett]

This lens is awesome for real estate. A tad heavy I'm sure, but stopping down to f/6.3 or so is typical for flash real estate so it didn't need to be so large. The quality is so good though and excellent focal lengths. Only issue I've had is color temperature doesn't always work right in auto with this lens (things look way orange by default) so even though shooting in raw it must be corrected in post, or set manually prior to taking. 14mm is so much fun to shoot with. It's like seeing the world in a whole new way. Distortion isn't even too bad.. also love the build quality. Excellent lens.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I agree. This is a really great lens.

[@whatthefitt]

This lens vs the Sony 12-24 f4 - I can’t decide 😂 I can get the sigma for a couple hundred dollars less. But the extra 2mm and lighter weight 🤣

[@MattTrevett]

@whatthefitt Either one will work for you. But the Sigma is great.

[@whatthefitt]

@@MattTrevett likely to go with the sigma! Can’t imagine how will it feel and look on my Sony zv-e1 lol

[@micr75i]

Many thanks for the great review! I am always curious on how zooms compare to primes. If you are familiar with the Batis 18mm and Batis 25mm, would you say that they have an advantage in terms of sharpness and color rendition over this lens or not? I am aware that individually they are much smaller than this lens though. thanks!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I've reviewed both those lenses, and I would say that they don't really have any significant advantages. The Batis 18mm might have a minor sharpness edge in the center of the frame, but not the edges, and has more distortion. The 25mm is sharper along the edges but doesn't have as much contrast as the 18mm, so I don't think it would have any major advantage over the Sigma. I didn't directly compare them, however.

[@micr75i]

Dustin Abbott thanks a lot!

[@benpearce2044]

Great review Dustin - very much looking forward to getting my copy soon!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Enjoy!

[@Waresy23]

Better at Astro than the 24mm GM? Thanks for your reviews!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I haven't tested the GM, so I can't comment.

[@sandb1867]

@Waresy23 2 stop difference. Not a very good comparison for astro or non-astro.

[@stevedee2043]

At the same focal length ? Probably not as clean as the gm for low light. 14mm vs 24mm is a huge difference for Astro.

[@enricoviappiani4305]

the GM isnt the best in terms of coma. The new 20mm 1.8 seems to be a killer performer btw

[@Waresy23]

@@enricoviappiani4305 Coma is well controlled at 2.8 in comparison to the Sigma. I've read the 20mm 1.8 is great, but it's 20mm.

[@CREATIVIZOR]

Meticulously detailed, technically deep yet easily understandable, outstandingly informative and professionally presented making it easy to focus on real content matter. Dustin, yours is the best channel on KZbin when it comes to knowing about lens. Mostly, it takes atleast 15 to 20 videos for me to subscribe to a channel, but I got the gist of the your high quality content just in 2. Please suggest what would you recommend, will be the best FE lens to pair with Sony A7iii for 1) Kitchen studio indoor background with good lighting setup. Filming tasty style recipe videos to get sharp closeup mouthwatering macro over the top and 40 degree footage while cooking on the heat. Fast timelapse, fast forwards from the oven glass and on stove frying. 2) Cinematic brolls, slow motion while cutting, chopping, pouring, slicing and prepping the food. Also very Important - host/talent presenting prescriptive style narration during intro, in betweens and end to explain tips and techniques to fast prep, cook and present the dish. 3) Small size products(phones), white goods(washing machine) and car reviewing Carwow and MKBHD style videos along with host talking to camera. 4) Business Enterpreneurship Valuetainment, Tai Lopez style videos. host/talent presenting talking to camera on business, finance topics and pointers scrolling or highlighting on the clear seemless white background. CAN ANY ONE LENS DO ALL OF THE ABOVE? SHORTLISTED LENses For FOOD FILMING over the top and 1) Sony FE 90 mm F 2.8 Macro OR 1) FE 35 mm F 1.8 Food close up brolls, ff, slow mo 2)Sony FE 16 to 35 F2.8 GN Or 2) Tamron 17 to 35 F 2.8 Or 2) Sony 16 to 35 F4 FOR TALKING to CAM VIDEOs 3) FE PZ 28 - 135 Mm F4 OSS Cine OR 3) Tamron 28 to 70 F2.8 OR 3) Sony Fe 24 to 105 f4 oss Please suggest if one of these above or some other lens can do all of the above Or would you recommend 2 lens combination? All indoors, with good lighting setup. NOTE: I have a sony 28-70 F3.5 to t.6 kit lense that came with A7iii. Thanks in advance HIGH REGARDS for your work. Sanjay

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thank you!

[@vettepwr23]

Hi Dustin. Great review! I am looking to replace my Sony Zeiss 16-35 F4 lens. It has served me well but I’d like to have something with a wider aperture. The 16-35 F4 is the only lens I have with less than 24mm. I also would like to get into astrophotography too but have been told I need a lens with at least 1.8 aperture. Do you think this would be a good replacement for my 16-35? Also, what are your thoughts for astro use as well. Thanks.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I think this is a good option if you want to go wider (and with a wider aperture). As for Astro, I consider F2.8 to be the minimum that is really useful. It really does depend on your conditions, but in many cases, F2.8 is sufficient to keep the ISO at a reasonable level.

[@Canada151337]

Dustin you have some of the best videos on gear, you are among my first stops in planning my gear trajectory! I'm just getting into paid work doing real estate, and am using a samyang 12mm fisheye and the 28-70 kit lens. They both work fine... but I'm finding it annoying to have to do everything twice, I think I'm going to look into getting this lens after watching this video! Thank you!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

This is good one, for sure.

[@Kemal_3rd]

Yes, my first place to check infos on gear decisions. !

[@georgiyonevski3894]

Thanks for the nice review! Do you know when it’s coming to canon rf mount?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

At this stage I've not heard anything from anyone about when we might expect Sigma lenses on Canon RF.

[@Kemal_3rd]

Dustin, can you help me please? I have the aonsy a 7 4 with the kits lens, I am looking for a budget wide zoom lens for videography. I want to use autofocus in my documentary and use it alot in buildings and cars. maximum budget would be 1.5k , but if it is possiuble under 1000, it would be also nice. ive seen ur 18mm samyang prime, im not sure though if 18 mm is enough in a car.? I dont have alot money, so I think a zoom would be the place to go. or 2 primes ? like the 18mm samyang ( if its enough), and a 24 or something ?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

The new Sigma 16-28 might work for you, and the two Samyangs is a valid approach, too.

[@Kemal_3rd]

@@DustinAbbottTWI thx for answering, been waiting nonstop haha. SHuld i prefer the tamron 17 28 ?? ive heard that a G2 will be announced later this year..... I decided to buy the 28 75 tamron G2, and Sigma 20 F2, as my 2 first lenses. And i also just ordered the 12 24 gm f2.8. .... should i return the sigma now ?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Are you happy with the Sigma? If you are, then just enjoy it

[@Kemal_3rd]

@@DustinAbbottTWI couldnt buy the 12 24. So ill stay for now wird the tamron G2 and the New sigma 20. thank you alot

[@sandb1867]

1:26 What? Do you know for a *fact* that a "Canon EF" version was adapted to Sony E-mount?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Yes I do, actually.

[@sandb1867]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Do tell. I find it hard to believe Sigma would translate a "native" Canon AF algorithm to Sony. Unquestionably my Sigma FE lenses AF MUCH more reliably and faster than my Canon lenses with a Metabones IV, which is purportedly better than the MC-11.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's not at all true with Sigma lenses. The MC-11 is specifically designed for Sigma lenses; the Metabones isn't. Your Sigma FE lenses (outside of the three new lenses - this one, 45mm F2.8, and 35mm F1.2) have essentially an MC-11 built into the housing near the lens mount. If you look at the back of your lenses, you will see there is a deep space before you get to any lens elements.

[@sandb1867]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Are you serious? No one is contesting what is effectively an extension tube on a DSLR lens. However, to suggest you have *proof* that an integrated MC-11-- i.e., hardware AND SOFTWARE are mounted on the earlier E-mount lenses is a complete falsehood. I find it increasingly difficult to take your reviews seriously.

@@sandb1867 well if you do little research you will find that is true on official sigma pages they can do for every mount - www.sigma-global.com/en/lenses/cas/service/mcs/#mcs01

[@digitalclips]

I just ordered this lens, now in 2021. I moved from Canon to Sony Alpha when the A7iii came out and so far I have a range of Sony lenses up to and including the 200-600mm G lens but I was lacking a wide-angle and was considering the 12-24mm Sony GM but at that price and feeling the 14mm will be wide enough this seems like a great option. Your chat convinced me to give it a try. Thank you.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Enjoy your new lens!

[@jonnyelpoiss7]

Got it monday, it is really amazing! Thanks, you helped my decision.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Glad you're enjoying it.

[@BSLKB]

Looks great is there a front element filter system that you have found works...I use benro’s filter system?

[@BSLKB]

I realize it has no threads but some systems clamp on the lens barrel

[@jdinn32]

Great summary! Thanks

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

You're welcome.

[@pdbdd]

could you make a video comparing the sigma 14-24 vs the tamron 17-28? I havn't seen any videos comparing the two.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Watch the image quality episode. There's a lot of comparison in that video.

[@aroubin]

Great information and sample images / videos. Thank you!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Glad to help out.

[@mingjiezhao227]

Hi Dustin. I recently bought this lens and saw some "dust" inside the front glass. Did you see the dust in your lens? Thanks!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I don't recall seeing any.

[@sydneydance]

Great review Dustin! Good to see you’re recovered from the injury last month. I’d like to ask for your opinion: I have the opportunity to buy this Sigma for only US$211 more than the Tamron 17-28 RRP (due to a camera store sale). I would be using it for low light social dancing videography on a gimbal, where there is cramped space and I can see the 14mm would be super useful as I might be close to the dancers, but I also would love to take landscape shots (especially some long exposure landscape shots at the beach) and would love to get into astrophotography. I’m quite torn because I have just purchased a Tamron 28-75 and could pop a filter onto both Tamrons, and I have read that it is just really inconvenient and not as good to put the gel filter on the back of the Sigma. But the 14mm would be better than the 17mm and for only $211 more, I would normally pick up the Sigma if not for the bulbous front lens and lack of filter option 😔 Your thoughts on which one I should purchase? Keep up the great reviews!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It is a tough decision. Unfortunately you'll probably have to decide based on your priorities - does have the great width for your recitals take precedence of the need for filtering? My gut is for you to go with the Sigma, as in many situations for landscapes you will be able to use filters on the Tamron 28-75mm and still get reasonable framing. I will be reviewing some rear filter options for the Sigma shortly, so there are some good choices on the way!

[@sydneydance]

Many thanks for the tip, Dustin! Looking forward to the filter options video! I have seen nothing on KZbin nor on the web regarding good filter options for the Sigma. Just one Korean video of a person cutting out a gel filter with the stencil and installing it into the slot...

[@eViperRabbit]

Sydney, this site has some discussions on rear filter options www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1609212/31

[@DonJayeWorld]

What store is having that sale?

[@RobertWhitfield]

Great review and that Tamron is not bad either! This looks to be a stunning lens especially for video. On that front, how does the auto focus on this lens compare to the outstandingly fast Sigma 18-35 1.8? Any downsides to connecting this lens to a Metabones Speedbooster to get 1 stop more light like the 18-35?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

This lens should give you better/faster autofocus on its native mount vs an adapted lens.

[@RobertWhitfield]

@@DustinAbbottTWI thank you for your experienced insights and advice!

[@commane21]

This might be an ideal combo with the Tammy 28-70, even if there's 4mm in the middle of missing coverage. (I'd love to go with the Tammy 17-28, but I do RE photography and many homes have powder rooms for which the 17mm is just too narrow.) Thank you.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

If you are doing interiors, the extra width is going to be very valuable.

[@ctromsky5729]

Hey Dustin. Opinions on this vs the Tamron 17-28?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Watch the definitive review. Lots of comparisons to it there.

[@BartzConcept]

Would be great to see a round up comparison of the best ultra wide zoom lenses with some urban FOV examples for the sony system. Comparing Sigma 14-24, Sony 12-14, Sony 16-35 GM, Tamron 17-28, and Laowa 10-18 (and maybe the zeiss 16-35). I'm looking for a wide angle zoom and trying to weight up aperture and minimal focal length

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Hi Bart, doing big comparisons is a very expensive proposition for me personally in both time and money. It is also very reliant on availability of lenses.

[@lakejindsay]

Another incredible review, Dustin. Thanks. Can't wait for your 35 1.2 review. Really hoping you say something similar about coma and vignette as I'd like to use that to take some stacked panos of the milky way.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I just finished the image quality episode today. That content starts rolling out next week.

[@paulvink126]

Thank you for an excellent review. I have just bought this lens and I am not disappointed.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's exactly what I would expect to hear.

[@Vultite]

Better for astro than a Tokina firin 20mm F2?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I haven't used the Tokina, so I can't comment.

[@GaryJahman]

The sigma is definetely something else! Not sure if you mentioned anything about the minimum focus distance? I listened to the whole video during my editing process lol I think if you'd consider the Tamron then you already must have the 28-75 and want to have the other Tamron E-Mount lenses that just been announced. So then you have a complete line up with Tamron. Meaning all same filter size, quality and lower price in overal.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

The MFD isn't amazing on the Sigma, and I didn't find it performed incredibly well at MFD. Not really the strength of the lens. I dealt with that more in the first episode.

[@GaryJahman]

@@DustinAbbottTWI alright, thank you for your thoughts. I missed that episode, so I'll be watching that one tomorrow :)

[@EvanWisheropp]

Great review.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thanks!

[@xpynuker]

Beautiful review as usual!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thank you!

[@AnalyseSciences]

compare Sigma 14-24mm f2.8 vs Tamron 15-30mm f2.8 G2, which one is the best

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I did some comparisons of the lenses on Canon with the EF version of the Sigma. Look back at the review of the EF 14-24mm for those comparisons.

[@phototommyfive]

For the sigma, can you put a matte box over it?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I don't know the answer to that.

[@phototommyfive]

Okay, thanks!

[@nhwine]

Great review. I picked this lens up a couple weeks ago and it is great for the type of landscape and industrial photography I used it for. Very pleased with the sharpness. It is a bit heavy though.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Agreed. Enjoy it!

[@Aditya-K-Balu]

Thank you so much. Brilliant and a spot-on review. Quick question though. Will this be a good lens for group portraits during weddings and events? Or would you recommend the 24-70mm f/2.8 from Sigma? Thank you once again.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It is probably unnecessarily wide for many group shots (though that's not true if it is a tight space), but the big advantage is that you would have far less distortion at 20-24mm than if you used the 24-70mm for the same shot.

[@qudek77]

How does it compare to 16 35 GM?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Pretty well, from what I understand, but I haven't directly tested it.

[@qudek77]

@@DustinAbbottTWI I can't find the comparison anywhere, I'm trying to decide between the two which one is better (no matter the price)

[@TheBlacksheep1967]

Superb review as always Dustin. If you have to choose (for your Sony A7r3 or for a Panasonic Lumix S1 ) one of two different Sigma 14-24mm lenses ( DG Art and DG DN) without consider price and weight which one would be your choice ? In terms of optical quality only.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I like the a7R3 a lot and the 14-24 DN is a great lens to pair with it.

[@vpr5562]

Dustin, great. May i ask - is the AF silent during video, but in continues mode? Not only when pulling fast focus.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It's silent all the time.

[@austinbrown3588]

Really amazing review Dustin! You may have sold me on this for my a7ii

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Enjoy!

[@skymakai]

How does it compare with the Sony 12-24 f/4 though?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Haven't tested that lens, so I don't know.

[@vishnusundar7254]

Can I use this on my Sony a 6000

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

yes, though the crop factor will affect the focal length, making it an equivalent 21-36mm focal length.

[@carpediem5008]

The crop factor will affect the *angle of view* . The lens' focal length remains the same.

[@sriramdinavahi]

Dustin, Thank you for the detailed review. Could you please compare this lens with Sony 16-35 f2.8 and let us know your thoughts? It will be very helpful! Thanks!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I don't know that I will be able to make a direct comparison because of my supply situation for the Sony, but I do hope to work through more of the G Master lenses in 2020

[@deeyammy783]

Great review, thanks!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

You're welcome.

[@sumanhazra8731]

Sir which wide angel lens i should go for Sigma Art 14-24 2.8 or Tamron 17-28 2.8

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I can't answer that question for you. It depends on your priorities. The Tamron is smaller, lighter, cheaper, and uses traditional filters. The Sigma has the more dramatic focal length, a nicer build, and is a little better in the corners. Buy according to your priorities.

[@sumanhazra8731]

@@DustinAbbottTWI thanks for the information, By profession i do weddings, and by heart i love to take extreme wide shots of landscapes, nature, mountains and architecture. I am looking for lens which is sharp image from edge to edge with much more clarity and less distortion, in my wedding projects i love to take close wide shots with bride and groom.

[@aroubin]

What are your impressions on this vs Sony 12-24 F4? Specifically, about IQ and distortion on the wider end. Also, do Sony cameras (A73, A7R3) have lens correction info or do distortions have to be fixed in post in LR?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I can't really answer your first question as I haven't yet reviewed the Sony 12-24. As for the second question, there is in-camera profile corrections for JPEG and Video, while a profile will have to be applied in post for RAW images.

[@aroubin]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Thank you Dustin for a quick and informative response! Looking forward to your future review of Sony 12-24 f/4!

[@shootermcgavin4999]

Dustin you deserve more subscribers.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I won't argue with that!

[@ktk0358]

Again great overview! It is a bit pricey but heck of a value over the Sony's native 'just F4' lens on 12mm. Happy Holidays!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

True enough.

[@photographerjonathan]

I skipped to the end of the video where you talked about the value compared to the 16/35 GM. I know its an f2.8 lens. but as far as focal range wouldn't it be better compared to the Sony 12/24 f4 ?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Well, technically it falls right between those two options and is more similar in kind to the F2.8 lens. I didn't directly compare the lens with either option, however, as I didn't have them on hand and review multiple lenses per month. I can't make every review a huge comparison.

[@digitalavatar5699]

sigma is 2.8f

[@photographerjonathan]

@@digitalavatar5699 you are repeating what I already said.

[@XDR2201]

Hello Dustin, could you compare Samyang XP 14 2.4 and this Sigma for Astrophotography on A7 series? Which one is better?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Hi PJ, those are both great lenses for astro. You'd be happy with either one. I would probably go with the Sigma, as it is more practical. Native mount, autofocus, zoom range, and lower distortion.

[@pralaybreeze9240]

Much awaited review..

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Then enjoy!

[@riotrob]

No mention of the Sony 12-24? Isn’t that the competition?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I did mention it, actually, but since I haven't yet tested it or even touched one, it is probably foolish to share an opinion, no?

[@riotrob]

Dustin Abbott that’s fair. Thanks

[@DennisMoncla]

Dustin, Thanks for your great reviews. I always love them. Once again I seek you advice as I find myself at a crossroads. In the next year I will hopefully be traveling to Italy. I will have my 28-75 with me but really think I'll need a wider lens. I keep going back and forth with the 17-28 vs this 14-24. I also have started doing some relestate work and have been using my 18 battis 2.8 but would really like another mm or two on the wide side. I think the versatility of these zooms will be better on a trip than the Battis. Which lens is your choice for travel and or realestate work? As a side note I plan on trying some astro work but that still hasn't happened.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I would probably go with the 14-24 if real estate is part of the equation.

[@DennisMoncla]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Thank you and it is. A known local realestate photographer asked me to help him as he gets busier and needs to travel some too. I was honored he asked me as he is known for his great work. I appreciate your advice. When things get so close I seem to get paralysis by analysis. Sometimes when someone finally gives me the advice to something it makes me realize that I realy wanted to do the other and just couldn't see it. This time I think I agree with you and it was just the money tempting me. If I'm in the Duomo in Itally in the future and I had the 17 and couldn't quite fit the scene in I would be upset I saved a few bucks.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Money is a real consideration, to be sure.

[@DennisMoncla]

@@DustinAbbottTWI The 14-24 Art came in today! Love it already. Thanks again for the advice and the great reviews as always!

[@georgemueller9681]

In your opinion how does this lens compare to the Sony 16-35mm f/2.8 GM lens? I'm aware of the difference in focal length but I'm referring to overall picture quality.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I haven't yet reviewed the GM, so I can't comment.

[@timelapsebylkunl72]

Great review as always. Thanks so much. I just made order it.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Enjoy!

[@TrevorMcGrathPhotography]

Hi Dustin. I please highlight to anyone investing in the Nisi S5 Filter Kit for this lens that it is Special Order for Sony E Mount and Leica L Mount as the hood diameter is 85mm. On the older versions in Canon EF and Nikon F Mount, the hood diameter is 96.4mm

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thanks for the info.

[@Quarker]

Can't decide. On the one hand, the Sigma has a 14mm lower end making it more versatile, but with the Tamron it's much easier to do outdoor video using ND's (I already use the Tamron 28-75).

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's very true.

[@christianavalos7096]

Would it be worth it to get this lens over the Tamron 17-28 f.2.8, for astrophotography and some street photography? Or should I just save a few hundred dollars and get the Tamron?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Ultimately you have to decide that for yourself. Do you need the wider focal length of the Sigma? How important is using filters easily to you? Both lenses are high performing, so you don't have to use that as a deciding factor.

[@christianavalos7096]

Dustin Abbott hmm? Didn’t think this decision was gonna be so tough. I just don’t want to have buyers remorse. Anyway, thanks for the reply.

[@jasona2305]

I am really glad I ve seen this (and thanks Dustin for yet another thorough lens review!) I am in need of a WA FE *native* lens and somehow I missed the news of this lens being released a year ago! I wanted something preferably wider than the Loxia 21 and the options I had in mind were the Batis 18mm, Sony 12-24mm and also tempted by the latest 1.8 20mm Sony G (although I d still prefer something wider as I said!). 16-35GM is out of my budget, hence not considered at all. My use for the lens, would be mostly landscape (nature & architecture), but also some astro. Hence I was having my doubts about the f4 12-24mm Sony. The new Sigma is wide enough and in theory ticks all the boxes for my requirements. In terms of IQ/resolution, does it really stack up even against the Batis (both at 18mm of course!)? If it does, I find it pretty amazing - how can a zoom compete with a (top) prime as the Batis! I also have a query - more of a technical nature: What is the focal length that one expects to see minimum/neglectible of that 'fish-eye' effect that most WA lenses have (the Sigma included). I understand that no lens can ignore the laws of physics, but what focal length is safe to say that this distortion is minimal or not to an extend that 'stretches' otherwise fine lines into an oval shape? But as I said, I understand that its not physically possible to have an ultra WA lens with no distortion at all.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I don't think there is a major difference between the two lenses optically. The Batis is better in the center; the Sigma in the corners. You'll get a pretty distortion-free experience from 18-20mm range on the zoom.

[@jasona2305]

@@DustinAbbottTWI It seems that most decent (and above) lenses are stronger in the center and get soft towards the edges. This Sigma seems to be an exception to this rule - it's uniform from center to edge. So a direct comparison with the Batis 18mm, makes the Sigma look 'soft' in the center (in comparison). I d expect it to have more similarities with some of the Loxia range (especially the 25mm) which from previous review I remember you saying that also has a more uniform profile from center to edge. Also - about the size - I hear people complaining that 'it's too heavy/bulky' - well it has been redesigned for FE, lost some of it's weight/bulk compared to the DSLR version - I mean you can't expect a zoom lens of such wide focal length have the same size as a Loxia..! All-in-all, if money is not a consideration, would you agree that this is the best UWA lens you can get for FE at the moment? (I mean for someone who is looking a landscape multipurpose + astro lens!) It almost seems to pack virtues that you d usually expect from a prime (around that focal length)

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I do think it is the best wide angle zoom on FE at the moment.

[@jasona2305]

@@DustinAbbottTWI I think the my sweet spot is 17mm. My prime contestant was the 18mm Batis, since it's probably the top quality option within my budget. Resolution is top notch on the Batis, it's got AF which I like (and MF experience which I don't!), it's weather sealed (important for me). This Sigma's got all these, proper MF experience for when I need it, plus some more FL range I could use if needed, but will cost me some 200USD more (that's the price gap where I m at!). Although 200USD isn't neglectible, since both lenses are within my budget, I don't want money to be the determinant factor. I just want to grab what will give me the best IQ for my FL and as much as possible future-proofness, in terms of resolution, when I move towards a FF body (I m still on APS-C...) I was hoping that somewhere along the way, there would be a Loxia 15mm (as there was a Milvus 15mm), but that would still have me perplexed, as I d like to have that AF. I have also checked the previous reviews you did on the 14-24mm (but for Canon EF) via MC-11. So how does the native Sony FE version of the Sigma compares to the Canon (on a Canon body I mean!)? So, yes, all in all, it's a tough one, I m still undecided. Still looking at image samples of both (Batis + Sigma), trying to make comparisons, whilst I should probably toss a coin and let that decide for me!

[@ajsdu06]

Thank you for these fantastic reviews Dustin. Please review the Samyang 18mm F2.8 FE lens as well. It looks like a little gem.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I've asked for a review copy, but my Samyang guy hasn't been responding to my emails the last month. He may not be there anymore.

[@ajsdu06]

@@DustinAbbottTWI ohhh damn... I hope you'll get your hands on on. It gotta be good marketing for them as well. You do by far the best and most extensive reviews on the web.

[@Jwitherow1964]

How do I become a Patreon

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

You can visit here and follow the instructions: www.patreon.com/dustinabbott

[@jakewerth9614]

This is my favorite zoom lens I have used

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It's a nice lens, for sure.

[@AmanRajput01]

I’m looking for this especially for real estate!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It's a pretty good choice. Sigma's 12-24mm was the better real estate option, but they haven't released an FN version of that lens yet.

[@AmanRajput01]

@@DustinAbbottTWI thank you for the reply. I’m considering to pair it with Sony A73

[@criticaltinker]

The best reviewer imo.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thank you!

[@hongk0ngfu3y]

this vs sony 12-24

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I'm afraid I don't have access to that lens at the moment. Getting Sony loaners in Canada is difficult at the moment.

[@BR-2049-1]

I wonder how it performs relative to the Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8 (which I have). But that seems like a beast to put on a small Sony body (A7R III). So worrying about weight distribution as well.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I don't shoot Nikon, but I understand the original Sigma compares quite well. I suspect this is the same.

[@metrostills]

Thank you for this excellent review. Your videos have been an excellent recourse as I transition from Nikon to Sony. I would love to hear your thoughts on this lens when compared to the Zeiss Batis 18mm.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I think the Batis has slightly more microcontrast in the center of the frame but isn't as good in the corners. The Zeiss has more distortion as well.

[@HaydenGoldsworthy]

My home city, thanks for the review!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

You're welcome!

[@jasona2305]

Several years back, when FE was still 'under development' with several lenses missing from the new line up, critics used to say that due to the FE mount being narrow, it would make lenses for this mount much more complex from a technical point of view, in a way that eventually they ll lose the battle to the usual suspects (i.e. Z and RF rivals). Now, several years after, FE mount has filled up their lens options significantly (except maybe few more tele options e.g. 400mm and above) Now, considering this 14-24mm Sigma, which is UWA (hence the narrow FE mount should pose some issues...), and being able to live up to it's expectations, isn't that the proof that Sony will manage to pull this through? I mean, surely, both Nikon and Canon have the means to catch up eventually, but do you really believe that Sony dig their own grave when it comes to chosing to go with the narrower mount design? If you were starting now (as a PRO photographer), which system would you chose?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It may be in the long run that the bigger mount makes a difference, but to this point Sony has done just fine with their mount. There are a lot of fantastic lenses in E mount.

[@r32rtb]

I had this lens for a week and liked everything about it but there was an issue when doing video. It would generate a flicker. I asked Sigma and they suggested sending back. Not sure is anyone else has had this issue. Might try another one.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I haven't seen that issue myself. It might have affected just your copy

[@r32rtb]

@@DustinAbbottTWI This is one of the videos... 1drv.ms/f/s!AsySzm1DPWTZgp0_YSzoL5yAil9Dpw

[@royzargo8642]

I kept Sigma 14-24 and send back Tamron so far 0 problems in video and photo, worth every penny. You just had a bad copy. I also had a Sony 12-24 sold it immediately after testing Sigma.

[@r32rtb]

@@DustinAbbottTWI I got another copy and it did the same thing. I alter the Mark Galer www.markgaler.com/sony-alpha-custom-settings-and-support settings for video from shutter priority to manual and the flicker seems to have stopped so far. This must be something to do with the shutter priority on the Sigma lens while doing video. This didn't happen on any of the Sony glass I have. I didn't try on with the MC-11 and Canon glass...

[@davidroth7138]

Top-notch. Like usual 😊

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thank you very much.

[@dr.sommer5069]

Great review. Waiting for the Canon 15-35 f2.8.

[@chirag4]

reviews suggest it isn't sharp in corners, i'll wait for DA's video, whenever he acquires an EOS-R body for testing RF lenses. It'd be a treat to see his side of the story, one of the very few youtubers - best in business.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I'm working on getting an R body for reviews right now, so hopefully I'll start getting to some of the RF lenses in the near future.

[@harmantatla4250]

Thanks for the genuine review

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

My pleasure 😊

[@mmughal]

All that tech talk about Lenses, Photography from you is meditating now :)

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Hmmm, not quite sure what this means.

[@kenwilliams3208]

I've been searching for an all-around top performing astrophotography lens - I think I have found it- thank you...!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Glad it was helpful!

[@LuluandMurdoch]

Another PERFECT review, looks like I’ll be adding this to my line up which will only be my second lens. My only lens right now is the 50mm Art by sigma , thankyou Dustin💃

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It's a very nice lens, for sure.

[@BrillianceAutoSpa]

Me not being able to put an ND on the front is a deal breaker for me. I don't want to carry two different types of ND filters.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Fair enough. The Tamron 17-28mm might be a better option for you.

[@BrillianceAutoSpa]

@@DustinAbbottTWI i was actually thinking Sony 16-35 f2.8 GM!

[@cheeta2705]

Your reviews are always very good, however I suggest the Sony 12-24mm, which is superior in every way IMO to the Sigma. If you review the Sony 12-24mm vs. the Sigma I'm confident you will agree.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I'm highly skeptical, but I do hope to review the Sony in the future. I can guarantee that there's at least one area where it is not superior...and that's in opening the aperture to F2.8.

[@kno1316]

Please compare to sony 12-24mm

[@exzemoron]

Great review about a great lens. But unfortunately my primary niche is concert photography (nobody ever includes us), so I am afraid that AF would be too slow and that my only choice is to buy all lenses from GM catalogue 😢🤷🏻‍♂️

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

If you're earning from your photography that does help justify the GMs.

[@exzemoron]

@@DustinAbbottTWI thx for your reply. I do earn something, not much tho, as I am shooting mostly local bands, so budget is.... 😅 so, I am not do this for a living just yet.

[@ibrahimkhaled7811]

Is there ND filter for rear filter holder or not ? I searched online & couldn't find any information .. so what's your advice ?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I've just received one yesterday to evaluate, though I have to get another 14-24mm in as a loaner.

[@ifilmic]

I never understood how on earth, someone "Dislike" Dustin's reviews. Just plain ignorance I guess.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I've got a few people who really, really don't like me for some reason. I suspect it is because I'm a pastor and they hate Christianity.

[@thomasm5780]

Zeiss Batis 18mm or this for iq

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

IQ is not hugely different. The Batis might have a tiny edge in the middle; the Sigma better in the corners.

[@scotthullinger9955]

On the contrary, Sigma lenses are truly junky when compared to quite a few other brands. Trust me, because I've owned Sigma lenses, and it's not as if Sigma has a stellar reputation anyway. Fragile autofocus motors, and not particularly sharp. But at least they "feel" very solid.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I've tested almost all the lenses that Sigma has produced in the past 6-7 years, and I can say with certainty that I've not found anything you've described to be true. I HAVE seen inconsistent focus with earlier lenses, but recent Sigma lenses have focused just fine. I own one Sigma lens at the moment, have owned about 5 others. I've never had any of them break down.

[@scotthullinger9955]

I'm not necessarily talking about Sigmas breaking down. They're just not a total package. One of my Sigma lenses hardly has a smooth working autofocus motor, and another one is quite soft, a moderate telephoto zoom lens for DX format cameras. Testing a lens is hardly the same thing as owning a lens and using it extensively. But I dunno, maybe the newer Sigmas are better? As for lenses which are a stellar value, they include many Nikkor lenses which have been around for quite a while, the ones with the ultrasonic autofocus motors, and those two stellar DC lenses, Defocus Image Control. Those things are built like a tank! But I also have a much cheaper quality construction Nikkor zoom lens of more recent vintage. Basically, you get what you pay for. But sometimes, even when you pay a pretty penny for something, you still get junk. As for great third party lenses, they truly include the recent vintage Tamron lenses which are worth every penny. Tokina also has a few fine quality lenses, also built like a tank and great image quality. My favorite oddball lens of theirs is an old fish eye zoom lens. Yes, a ZOOM lens.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

They certainly are.

[@oriomenoni7651]

Great review, thank you!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

You're welcome!

[@arashfayyaz]

Thank you for great review)

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

You're welcome.