Dyson DC15 The Ball Training DVD For Retailers 2005

[@glynroberts8832]

A mains powered dyson, soon to be a thing of the past. Thank you sir. Hope you have a great bank holiday.

[@ibaisaic]

I will. I thought I was working it but I’m not any more and the other half is away until Monday afternooon so it’s party central here.

[@glynroberts8832]

ibaisaic don't go mad. Lol.

[@vacuumtests9225]

I think this is the model what Dyson engineers decided to make after heavy drinking in the local pub. Very collectible, but needs to be handled with extreme care.

[@ibaisaic]

I like mine but it is probably the most over engineered Dyson ever.

[@mazayaxe]

Logic after the 1974 ball Barrow

[@MysteryManBob]

10:47 absolute mad lad he's got a coffee table made up of cyclones from his vacuums

[@a.a674]

Saw my friends nans dc15 today right after this was uploaded

[@RyanSellman1]

Dyson vac: I’m the only vacuum that doesn’t lose suction. Rainbow vac: Am I a joke to you, you little bugger?

[@2009danial]

You made me choke on my coke 🤣🤣🤣

[@neilmansfield8329]

This is a great vacuum cleaner

[@TechTier_]

Very fascinating.

[@Stephanie_koroleva_official]

Where is the full japanese commerical for the g force?

[@seamusellis1450]

DC15 leaves patches of dirt after 1 pass....

[@thepurdychannel8866]

Thats because the brush bar doesent cover the whole part of the base there are 3 gaps where the drive belt goes

[@zachbradley5209]

Lol, had a Dyson ad

[@dglcomputers1498]

and a SEBO felix/dart can't do a similar action without a ball? mad I rate SEBO build quality much higher than Dysons' and hygienic, yeah apart from that quite clear cloud of dust when emptying.

[@thepurdychannel8866]

You will empty outside so that wont matter

[@DJNoMask]

The purdy channel lol

[@kirstywilson7252]

I want one :(

[@jamieleestransporthub]

Nice one

[@Vorwerkfan]

This ist very nice

[@DeLuxeCarwashchannel]

The Dyson dc17 is a lot better in my opinion

[@thereallincolntakanashi]

A classmate of mine had this but she NEVER uses it unless needed. :)

[@mrsound6140]

Why doesn't she just sell it and get a newer Dyson upright?

[@ArchiezAviation]

o|o

[@travismoreland4605]

2

[@thereallincolntakanashi]

This thing had *LOADS* of things wrong with it when it hit *the U.S. market.* Also I could have recalled this had a feature that moved the duct on the base that switched from the floor head to the hose. This also lets you reach in there and *see what tf was stuck in there.* *This way you can see why it was losing suction.* And one more thing it had a circuit board *inside where the dust goes to the container.* A lot of $#!t wrong with this, m8!

[@maisie_forever5786]

Haii

[@jaywalkra]

Has the single Ball™ design notion blinded all Dyson engineers? Vorwerk and Sebo figured all you need is a simple swivel neck joint and "maneuverability problem" is solved. Adding the motor+filter to the ball simply adds higher profile to the cleaner, giving the likes of many other cleaner heads to have greater reach in REAL WORLD usage. What Dyson have done is taken the regular roller wheel on a standard combination floorhead, moved it backwards a bit, and made it bigger. Let marketing do the rest of the consumer brainwashing with Ball Technology™

[@hamzahassan7730]

Is it illegal now to make your own unique design?

[@jaywalkra]

@@hamzahassan7730 What are you on about?

[@hamzahassan7730]

jaywalkra The ball was just their own unique design. I think it looks nice. Plus, they were able to fit all the motors, wires and hoses in it. Not sure what you think about the ball design now because ur comment was 2 years ago.

[@jaywalkra]

@@hamzahassan7730 Unique yes. In fact I'd agree plenty of Dyson's designs are unique. The problem I have with them is that they don't deal with practical problems. By stuffing lots of components into the Ball, it makes the profile seem compact and good for marketing. Except when you try to vacuum under furnitures. The Ball creates a high profile design which prohibits users vacuuming in low-lying areas. That's where my original comment was talking about. A seemingly good design at first, but once you own and use it, you discover its flaws. As a former Dyson owner, I realised Dyson simply loves inventing new problems. Instead of having Dual Cyclone (2), let's have Radix Cyclone (12). And since that doesn't work, let's have Two-Tier Radial Cyclone (28+). And because there's dirt gets clogged in these tiny cyclones, we now have Cinetic Cyclones with silicone ended tips. They're stuck in this hole when the proven solution is to use a quality filtering media (see Miele, Numatic, Sebo).

[@hamzahassan7730]

jaywalkra Fine you win, but I’m sticking with Dyson

[@Tyler1915]

I have a Kirby Sanitronic VII that belonged to my grandmother and was built in 1963 And I have never lost suction. And I have the shake out bag. I’m sorry to say this and nobody’s going to like me for it but Dyson vacuums suck and I will never buy one.

[@haydendenileon7109]

Get a bissell

[@thereallincolntakanashi]

Ashton Rielliey killer exe Take it from *a Soviet:* *Scrap your Bissell and get a nice Sebo, comrade!*

[@RyanSellman1]

Lol they’re utter pieces of shit

[@neilmansfield8329]

This is a great vacuum cleaner