Ernst Questions Witnesses at Hearing on the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act

U.S. Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA) is a cosponsor of the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, which would require health care practitioners to provide the same degree of care to a baby who survives an abortion as they would any child born naturally premature at the same age.

[@lawrence4318]

Thank you Senator Ernst for your remarkable articulation of what it means to end the life of abortion survivors. It is truly mind boggling to learn of so many who would vote to end the life of these innocents, at the drop of a hat. May God have mercy on them.

[@codenameuniccorn2412]

How we even are having this debate blows my mind…. What other animal in nature chooses to kill its own life form it has created? The answer is none. The motherly instinct is to protect at all times and till death.. to kill your own creation goes against everything s mother stands for and is made up of. Truly mothers are being taught to directly fight against their motherly instinct. This is an agenda make no mistake.. it was never about “rights” that will never exist cus killing is no right at all. It’s an act of evil, and that only. Btw I shall call you Ms. Earnest

[@barrythomsen9065]

Thank you Senate Ernst ❤

[@barbarasamuel2855]

This topic is always heartbreaking. I feel so sorry that these sad things have to happen while respecting people's circumstances that result to these choices

[@whibraen2750]

"We as a society will be judged" ......as individuals, you and I will be held accountable for our decisions/choices....

[@1Andelina1]

Remember this in November Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, we all got that chance, we are alive.

[@nailbenderMatt]

If a person is dead when heart beat or brain function ceases. Isn’t it fair to use that same yardstick to measure the beginning of life?

[@Jimvesterstallone]

Thank you for speaking up. xoxo

[@szatanowska]

Yes its *ucked up, when i was pregnant i protected my belly and my baby inside me!!

[@donblosser8720]

My first reaction to this was What?! I remembered that similar legislation had previously passed. I also remembered Obama's lifelong opposition to any such protection of abortion survivors. At the time, his was a minority opinion. Our country's morals have degraded to such an extent that only one Democrat had the decency to vote against infanticide. The stumbling, bumbling, stuttering Nadler said, "The problem with this bill is NOT that it makes anything, that it is, is not that it provides any new protection from infants. The problem with this bill is that it endangers some infants by stating that that infant must immediately be brought to the hospital." In addition to Nadler's Freudian slip, "protection FROM infants", this is totally insane mental gymnastics. How can a baby be endangered by removing it from an abortion mill where they are all highly trained in KILLING babies and taking it in an ambulance to a hospital where it can receive life saving care? Even the ambulance would be a safer place than the abortion clinic. And who in their right mind believes that Nadler and his fellow depraved leftist apparatchiks really care about these infants? They are perfectly comfortable about them being murdered in the womb but a few moments later they want to protect this life? It's the same life, the same baby!

[@szatanowska]

It's not woman right to kill a child!! It's another person not you not your body it's another human a woman just carry for a moment!!! That child have different DNA different finger prints