Evolutionists Just COMPLETELY Changed Their Narrative on This

Evolutionists have just COMPLETELY changed their narrative on this. In this episode of Answers News, our hosts, Rob Webb, Roger Patterson, and Dr. Georgia Purdom, share their perspectives on this topic as Bible-believing Christians.
Subscribe to us for more biblical content every week.
“The fool says in his heart, ‘There is no God.’ They are corrupt, they do abominable deeds; there is none who does good.” (Psalm 14:1 ESV)
0:00 - Neanderthals Might Not Be The Separate Species We Always Thought
www.sciencealert.com/neandert...
5:08 - Dinosaur feathers may have been more birdlike than previously thought
www.sciencenews.org/article/d...
Note: Dr. Purdom meant to say that what are termed “avian dinosaurs” are really just birds and that “non-avian” dinosaurs are just dinosaurs.
11:57 - B.C. nurse risks losing licence in 'witch trial' over opposition to 'radical gender ideology'
www.rebelnews.com/b_c_nurse_r...
16:27 - Montana judge keeps in place a ban on enforcement of law restricting drag shows, drag reading events
apnews.com/article/montana-dr...
23:05 - Preacher facing prison for holding Bible verse sign near abortion clinic
www.christianpost.com/news/pr...
28:03 - Moon is 40 million years older than we thought, tiny crystals from Apollo mission confirm
www.livescience.com/space/the...
========
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics (Christianity-defending) ministry dedicated to enabling Christians to defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ effectively.
On our KZbin channel, you’ll find answers to your most pressing questions about key issues like creation, evolution, science, the age of the earth, and social issues. We desire to train believers to develop a worldview based on the Bible and expose the bankruptcy of evolutionary ideas and their implications.
You’ll hear from top teachers such as Ken Ham, Bryan Osborne, Dr. Georgia Purdom, Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson, Tim Chaffey, Bodie Hodge, Dr. Gabriela Haynes, Dr. Terry Mortenson, and more.
Please help us continue to share the gospel around the world: AnswersinGenesis.org/give

[@YECBIB]

Evolutionists evolve their narrative, nothing else. ✝️

[@markosterman4974]

That’s a good thing! Creationists can’t learn anything new because… the bible. How sad.

[@YECBIB]

@@markosterman4974 How does it feel to be a troll your whole life with no meaning?🤦‍♂️✝️

[@anda9690]

@@markosterman4974 there is nothing new under the sun, what was shall be and what will be already was

[@isaacramos8052]

@@markosterman4974 To learn something new is to observe new evidence or new knowledge. But evolutionary theories don't bring you new knowledge, they are just people's imagination, made up stories! Yet the bible teaches us a whole lot of new things. As the months and years pass by, reading the Bible opens up your mind and perspective on 100's of issues and topics! It would be foolish to think that by reading the Bible once, you can understand the entire knowledge of God! This being (God) created us, He is extremely more knowledgeable than His creation (humans). You, by believing that the only thing real is material, are very close minded. Open up your mind to accepting that there might be something beyond the natural world, in other words a super-natural realm.

[@nothing-om6fn]

These articles changed nothing, they just provided a lil bit more evidence to support theories we already had. Just because neanderthals were smart doesn't mean they were human

[@meripederson8379]

My anthropology teacher and I didn't agree on this so I'm glad science is finally waking up to the facts

[@onementality9781]

Science will evolve into truth with time. Lol

[@fohrum4757]

​@@onementality9781Yeah, I wish everybody could realize the Bible is truth. I'm not quite sure why no other religious texts are truth, but that's probably because I'm too ignorant to research those other false religions.

[@jncon8013]

@@fohrum4757No need to be so hard on yourself or call yourself ignorant. You can always study to learn more. I think you could find some great teachings in most religions. But of course, all religions disagree with one another and cannot be simultaneously true. So we are left with two possibilities: no religion is true, or only one religion is. Study away friend!

[@fohrum4757]

@@jncon8013 No need to continue anyway. You said it yourself. "No religion is true". Well done Sir, you're waking up 😊

[@fohrum4757]

@@jncon8013 Sorry, I really baited that comment to see if somebody would bite haha. I just didn't expect right away that somebody would admit that only one religion can be true and that they all conflict each other and thwt they could all be wrong. I definitely appreciate your honesty though. From an Atheist to a believer, I respect you Sir.

[@SK-bw2cv]

Jeremiah 17:9 “The heart is deceitful above all things, And desperately wicked; Who can know it?

[@betsieswartz]

Deceitful like these people

[@christophercoupe5006]

@@betsieswartz No! Deceitful like you!!!

[@betsieswartz]

@@christophercoupe5006 I am telling the truth, the opposite of deceitful. This channel, on the other hand is very much deceitful.

[@christophercoupe5006]

@@betsieswartz Ok since you have convinced yourself that you have the truth and this channel doesn't why don't you explain where this video is deceitful? I have been studying evolution for decades and can say neanderthals are fully human and closely related to people today! Evolutionists have been lying about Neanderthals for over a century claiming they are knuckle dragging missing links!

[@christtheonlyhope4578]

Different looking humans exist today and yet we are all still human.

[@bpljlb]

Different looking humans, hahahaha

[@nothing-om6fn]

There is a massive difference between humans that look different and another species that has a completely different skeletal structure.

[@katamas832]

Show me someone whose bone structure is anything like a neanderthals lol

[@christtheonlyhope4578]

@@nothing-om6fn you mean the skeletons that were pieced together like a jigsaw puzzle that were assumed to go together? Those skeletal structures?

[@christtheonlyhope4578]

@@nothing-om6fn the skeletal structures that were pieced together from miles around? That one?

[@darin7369]

Here in Montana (and in every other state across the country) voters have failed to do their research on candidates for judge. Whenever I point this out people say, "How can we? Because judges run without party affiliation." To start out, I think we need more focus on these elections. We need conservative voter guides in every state that document how the judges have ruled in various court cases as well as any partisan political donations in the past. These voter guides exist but aren't easy to find (thanks in part to big tech shadow banning) and we need to be better organized to get this information in front of people.

[@malibudolphin3109]

Just go online and type in judges name, cases will come up and give you a clue were judge stands on issues.

[@EvoS76]

That was the whole point of lowering the voting age to 18 and allowing everyone to vote. Did you know that when our nation was great you had to be a 35 year old, working, property owning, male in order to vote? But now 51% of the stupidest people dictate how everyone else will live.

[@EvoS76]

Also, hi from northern Idaho 😁

[@anarchorepublican5954]

..I'm new to Montana myself..and yes it's particular cryptic version of party politics can be very confusing...no one (especially Democrats)seems to like to designate their Party affiliation, while campaigning...

[@timotheus2003]

As a fellow Montanan, I'm always trying to look up as much as I can on a candidate to find out their affiliation or to see if there are any red flag words, phrases or topics that they might post about or have on their website.

[@xhyljen]

I’m so glad you were able to upload this after the live stream was shut down and made private while talking about the popular confusion of the genders. 🎉❤

[@betsieswartz]

Why would you subject yourself to this?

[@frosted1030]

The only confiusion seems to be on the religious side, they don't seem to understand the difference between sex and gender. Funny how silly they get when it comes to these core concepts.

[@xhyljen]

@@Moist._Robot I was watching the live stream in Britain so the live censorship could have been applied this side of the Atlantic.

[@xhyljen]

@@frosted1030 sex/gender has five different meanings and some people prefer to refer to one as sex and another as gender and ignore the other three.

[@delaineu7340]

A friend who now lives in Europe was amazed that a friend of theirs there would point people out and mention their town of origin. My friend asked the other women if she knew all these people. She replied no, but that all these remote towns had had very limited gene pools for at least 500 years making such pronounced facial changes as to make it easy to guess their town of origin. Now think of people groups completely isolated for even more years.

[@panaroid9636]

But isn't that exactly proof of evolution??

[@kevinrtres]

@@panaroid9636What exactly is "evolution"?

[@globalcoupledances]

@kevinrtres - Evolution is change over time from one common ancestor

[@delaineu7340]

@@panaroid9636 They are still human.. They have stronger expressions of, say distinctive ear size or shape. Broadening the gene mix mostly erase the strong expression. My husband's family in the old country have dark eye circles, the children had none with a new world spouse, a few grandchildren had it, no gg-grandcildren have the trait, but still have other family traits.

[@Reclaimer77]

@@panaroid9636 Yes. Humans and Neanderthals exchanged genetic materials through inter-breeding about 100k years ago. I don't know how this is proof of...whatever the Creationist are claiming. I mean they are clearly different species. Not only is that evident in the fossil record, but it's evident in their genetic code. Yes they are "similar" because of common ancestry. The same way we're similar with chimpanzees genetically.

[@shinnstoneer7]

Hey AIG, it would be awesome if you added chapter markers for each topic on each show. Always enjoy & appreciate the informational, educational & faith assuring content when I catch episodes.

[@razark9]

'' -informational, educational- & faith assuring content'' You mean religious anti-science propaganda?

[@betsieswartz]

It would be awesome if they deleted their entire channel

[@nuke_man_ai]

​@@betsieswartzfacts

[@nuke_man_ai]

No its not educational, just misinformational. Or dodgy.

[@davidlawrence616]

@@nuke_man_aiyeah, right! Evolutionary theory is one of the biggest frauds taught. No scientific evidence.

[@majin_koopah7960]

I'm 29 y/o Mexican from TX. grew up loving science and technology of humanity as i went thru school. continued to pay attention to the new scientific discoveries and archeology and the more i learned the less sense anything they said made, because they make it up. How evolution really happens, how old the world is, where we came from, they just keep changing it. science is great at finding how it all works but as soon as you ask why even neil degrass tyson says dont ask why just accept we figured out how it works. its because we need god for it to work or it be so unstable the universe or things in it would just vanish if it was all by chance. ive recently paid attention to the correlation of the bible stories to what has and is happening. im prepping my family for his coming im just glad i found out in time and hope to help use my knowledge to save who i can.

[@Peachy08]

My uncle submitted his saliva to National Geographic DNA study about 10 years ago. When he down loaded his results when they were ready, it showed he was about 2% Neanderthal. They were just humans that may have been isolated in a region but they were humans.

[@Reclaimer77]

Your uncle has more than 2% of his genes shared with the modern-day banana as well. Is he a banana? Serious question. I don't think you understand how DNA and evolution works.

[@markduell2468]

@@Reclaimer77 They believe what Ken Ham and crew tell them. They have no idea about actual science.

[@kenton6804]

@@Reclaimer77 When one looks at DNA for ancestry, the banana and shared genetics with other living things isn't taken into account. I think that's the kind of measure he's referencing here.

[@Reclaimer77]

@@kenton6804 Okay but I just don't understand how he can believe a 2% Neanderthal shared-DNA match means Neanderthal and Homo-Sapiens were both "just human". What about the 98% difference!? Am I taking crazy pills here or does something not add up?

[@betsieswartz]

Cap

[@beastlycrawdad6412]

I like the atheists that jumped in as soon as this was posted. I’m going to pray for all of you right now.

[@markduell2468]

Does prayer do any good?

[@beastlycrawdad6412]

It does for lots of things. It shows reverence to God first and foremost, it helps us give our worries and thoughts over to God, and it can be used on another’s behalf. Just as the Christians prayed for Paul whilst he was imprisoned.

[@John-kj5wh]

If it didnt do any good you wouldnt see atheists reverting back to it as soon as calamity strikes. And God knows the heart, when theyre simply not going to repent for the word, their requesting prayers arent "unanswered"" they just dont get the answer that they want, key word, THEY want. They couldnt care less what God wants. Ive gotten answers that i did not want but later learned it was best for me. They cant understand that. Eternal life? Resurrection? They dont even believe in these, so when catastrophe and tragedy arise they blame God. """"Ohhh how could he let this happen Where was God"""" like what? Where was Man? Right there. Sinning. Defiant.

[@markduell2468]

@@beastlycrawdad6412 On average, nine million children under the age of five die each year: many in abject poverty. Where is God?

[@zerosteel0123]

🙏

[@Gadfly247]

As for voting for judges, most of the time it is difficult to find out what these people actually believe or how they make their judgments. Find a conservative review of these judges tou are voting to and at the very least research who nominated or put them on the bench.

[@malibudolphin3109]

Just look online to see what cases comes up and how they ruled

[@eigenvalue5775]

Evolutionists: "Man evolved from monkeys." Non-evos: "You do look like a monkey's uncle." Evolutionists: "How dare you!"

[@demcdoug]

How daaaare you! You need to hang on the "a" a bit. 😊

[@malibudolphin3109]

@@demcdoug hi Greta!

[@malibudolphin3109]

If we evolved from monkeys, HOW is it monkeys still exist?

[@sciencerules8525]

@@malibudolphin3109 If French evolved from Latin, HOW is it Latin still exists? 😄

[@nothing-om6fn]

Please understand that we didn't evolve from monkeys, we and monkeys evolved from one common ancestor, just like you aren't an evolution of your brother but you both have the same mother.

[@SeaScienceFilmLabs]

A complete “Neanderthal” Skeleton has never been recovered. The only example of a skeleton, is a composite of two separate finds.

[@millennialpoes5674]

A quick Google search will demonstrate that more 300 seperate Neanderthal fossils are on record. Complete fossils of any kind are exceedingly rare. This is because a lot of conditions need to be met for fossils to form.

[@conservativeriot5939]

​@@millennialpoes5674it's still probably not enough to fill a truck bed.

[@millennialpoes5674]

@@conservativeriot5939 it doesn't matter. It's still obvious that they existed, when they existed, where they existed, and how we're related.

[@lizreyes6577]

Fossils can be formed in an hour. Smithsonian magazinehas an articleonit.@@millennialpoes5674

[@sciencerules8525]

@@lizreyes6577 That doesn't show ALL fossils formed in an hour. It also doesn't give any indication WHEN the fossils formed.

[@yohannbiimu]

My mother had her DNA checked via "23 and Me," and she found out that she had a trace of Neanderthal in her past. That's all the proof I needed.

[@IAMhassentyou]

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him. 18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God. John 3:16-18

[@robertseavor4304]

Nobody thinks that Great Danes and Chihuahuas are different species so why did scientists think that Neanderthals were a different species just because they looked different?

[@roydodds3693]

Their DNA is different, their skulls are a different shape and their behaviour was evidenced as marked different, no Neanderthal cave paintings for instance. I reckon further discoveries will show them to be more human than previously

[@Mdebacle]

The Scholar's Union discovered that Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA was 15-16ths human and 1-16th chimpanzee. The ape-men were not human ancestors. They were the result of human-ape hybridization, probably in Genesis 6 : 12. This mess was exterminated in the ensuing events.

[@betsieswartz]

It’s not just looks. You clearly don’t know what you’re talking about. There’s way more evidence, and chihuahuas and Great Danes are abundant where we can study them down to the cellular level. We can’t do that with an extinct, yes, species.

[@roscius6204]

Because Great Danes and Chihuahuas share DNA from a common ancestor they are the same species, Dog. 2 Great Danes will not bare a Chihuahua though. Dogs can still interbreed with wolves but they cannot interbreed with foxes. Genetic compatibility is the key here. If wolves became extinct, they would be an extinct branch of Canis. Neanderthals are an extinct branch of Hominid.

[@robertseavor4304]

@@roscius6204 Bollocks. Neanderthals are an absorbed breed of human.

[@wgterry73ify]

Let's see what "moderns" would be like if they were separated into various groups due to language

[@SK-bw2cv]

In a lot of ways they still are. America is an exception to the rule and only recently has integration been a big thing in Europe.

[@joshuakarr-BibleMan]

​@@SK-bw2cv English has been spoken all aroind the world since England ruled the seas.

[@roscius6204]

In principle, which is the honest position? Changing your narrative when new factual information becomes available. or Disregarding new factual information that doesn't fit your narrative.

[@mark5222]

That is assuming that the new available information is factual.

[@roscius6204]

@@mark5222 Well that is what I said it was, so that's the proposition.

[@joshuakohlmann9731]

Goodness me! Scientists adapting their theories in the light of new evidence, whatever next? Er, isn't that how science _always_ works? Why else would we have had so many different models of the atom?

[@johnwolff3562]

The Judge in Montana should be removed from office for cause. He is just not fit for office.

[@razark9]

Why?

[@RobertJohnson-de5zi]

The scientists and their worldview need to explain how many "millions of years" it would have for the bone structure to become hollow. That is just one of many things I like to see then explain. Of course with their worldview, all they need is time. Which is always their argument.

[@katamas832]

I mean, that's not that drastic of a change. Just removal of material from bones.

[@aaronadamson7463]

I mean, there are a lot of things unexplained. Like the viability of these "in between" systems, and how they could persist long enough to get to a completely different system without being wiped out. These pseudo systems aren't generally as good for survival as their predecessors or their supposed completed product, and would struggle to survive let alone find a compatible mating partner. Yet evolutionists will often respond with something like "well we see these differentiations today don't we? That's proof that it happened that way" simply presupposing that their mechanism is the only way it could have come about

[@roydodds3693]

As I'm sure you know already, most small dinosaurs evolved light, air-filled bones. If you don't need solid bones for rigid support - because you're a 30 tonne Diplodocus, then light bones provide great structural support without the penalty of weight. This makes you faster and better able to catch lunch. Your light boned offspring survive and out compete your heavier boned chums. If this gives you an advantage, it does not necessarily take "millions of years" for evolution to fast track a good idea. The dinosaurs had over 160 million years to explore many avenues for survival, that's why some weighed 50 tonnes, where 15 meters tall, were warm blooded, could survive in the Antarctic and some evolved feathers and flew.......time is a great healer, and brilliant at evolving life, and as a planet we've been lucky enough to have over 4 billion years of it 👨‍🎓

[@binhanh296]

​@@roydodds3693yup, anything couldn't be explained, put time in, boom, problem solved.

[@roydodds3693]

@@binhanh296 you have read the illustration right? Natural selection powers evolution through competitive advantage. Trying to ignore the fact the Earth is over 4,500,000,000 years old won't make the Earth any younger not will ignorance convince others that creationists are correct.

[@joshuafusselman3323]

Sometimes when I saw the squattier skull shape, referred to as Neanderthal, I wondered about this topic and how the anthropology related to religion and science. Did those skulls belong to people? Or apes that were more people-like than current apes? But then I saw a live guy in Texas that literally had that shape of a head. Not a separate species.

[@roscius6204]

That's about as far from scientific proof as you could possibly be....

[@nothing-om6fn]

Well, there are 8 billion people spread across the globe, the genetic diversity of humans is absolutely insane if you think about it. It is only reasonable that some of those will resemble neanderthals.

[@alonzomaynard9500]

Long lived humans ( pre flood) will develop bone structures such as you find within the so called Nethandral species. Also the atmospheric difference needs to be accounted for.

[@nothing-om6fn]

Bone structures don't change that much that fast, besides that would've meant that Noah was a neanderthal and pretty much everyone would have neanderthal DNA in them

[@the_neanderthal09]

bro what are you smoking cause i need some

[@betsieswartz]

Pre flood doesn’t mean anything because the flood never happened

[@Relatedonthate]

Good point, look at the people who live high in the mountainous regions

[@Relatedonthate]

naw-there has always been genetic mutations and variation.@@nothing-om6fn

[@bobjob2514]

Ben: are you jealous of my foot long sub? Bob: … that’s not a foot long. Ben: are you kidding me? Look. This ruler says it’s 12 inches. Bob: your ruler is too short. Upgrade your measuring tool. Ben: look here: these calipers say the sub is 12 inches… within one millimeter! Bob: What?! You’re still missing about two thirds of a foot. Ben: you can’t refute me now - this laser measuring device measures up to the picometer!!! Bob: gets the ruler and looks closely… Hey Ben, what’s the difference between an inch and a centimeter? Ben: (babbles in extreme frustration) It doesn’t matter how advanced your tool if you’re starting with the wrong standard. Trying to force the iPhone 99 of new fangled dating methods, tectonic maps, core samples, whatever… to match up with the same old (wrong) conclusion is not helping your argument. Trust the One who made it all. He already gave us the answer to the important questions.

[@betsieswartz]

Evidence for god?

[@JiraiyaSama86]

That would be interesting. Getting Speaker Mike Johnson to show up. I want to know more about who he is and what he stands for. So that would be great.

[@hglundahl]

12:35 Considering a great quote from Maria von Trapp (yes, the nanny who became a stepmother after having been a novice near Salzburg) from the Charismatic conference in Kansas City 1977, I bet she's pretty relieved to be out of this earthly life, considering what for instance Amy Hamm is going through.

[@cobramcjingleballs]

1970s, there was a book called buried alive. 2nd generation forensic orthodontists, he borrowed an xray prototype from his mentor (the guy who identified hitler from his teeth) to go over to europe and xray neanderthal skulls. He said, in book, they were just very old humans, on age of around 300 years. Because as everyone knows your brow, ears, and jaw changes as you get older. He described it pressures from chewing over a lifetime. This is directed around eyes to protect them to brow by cheekbones, like flying buttresses in architecture. Half of it very boring book with charts and figures....but the french CIA going after him was kinda fun.

[@Laughingatsciencedeniers]

I know this is just propaganda, but apologists should really stop pretending they're denying science for anything else than religious reasons.

[@ezkl9424]

Variety within the species.

[@CaptainFantastic222]

Scientific understanding and facts change all the time… it’s the main difference between science and dogmatic religious view that is unable to change to matter the facts..

[@thehumblepotatoreborn9313]

If you're constantly getting things then yes - you will have to change the facts

[@keithfrederick877]

Did you know of the human fossils they found in the thousands? I recently found out about them. Why weren't they made public? Simple, evolutionists are in control and purposely hid them because their presence disproves evolution.

[@TheWhiteTrashPanda]

Y'all need to do something about the echo in the room. Your recording software probably has filters and noise gates that will help.

[@settledown444]

What they *really* need to improve is the level of science literacy in the room. Sadly it looks like that will never happen.

[@wgterry73ify]

Fully human

[@the_neanderthal09]

duh

[@riftshredder5438]

Can we finally put to rest the notion that reptiles and birds are the same species?

[@globalcoupledances]

Not species. Reptilia is a "class"

[@katamas832]

There is so much wrong with this comment

[@Laughingatsciencedeniers]

Same species? 😂

[@LibromaniacChannel]

To offer an alternative biblical viewpoint: Neanderthals were known to make bone-flutes, are believed by many to have been shaggy/hairy, and they had penile sheaths (like a dog). As noted by top cryptozoologists, this is an excellent match with descriptions of satyrs, who were originally depicted simply as shaggy wildmen, but later portrayed as goat-men. The word translated as 'satyr' in the Bible is 'seirim' meaning "shaggy ones". Ultimately, satyrs were known to play pan-pipes, were shaggy like goats, and they were depicted in artwork as ithyphallic (due to the penile sheaths). In the Bible, they were used as sacrificial offerings, something which explains their extinction (as opposed to them not being able to hunt rabbits, according to scientists).

[@burnttoast2790]

*To offer an alternative biblical viewpoint: Neanderthals were known to make bone-flutes,* As did many early sapiens cultures. *are believed by many to have been shaggy/hairy,* _Believed_ by many who only have popular media to go off of. No, neanderthals weren't hairy ape-men like tabloid journals would have you think. *and they had penile sheaths (like a dog).* Nope. They would've had foreskins like us, but not a full-on sheath attached to the torso like in dogs. Even other apes don't have such a trait.

[@Barbutt]

18:23 Freedom of Speech doesn’t give you the right to talk to mine or ANYONE’S Kids. Ridiculous.

[@brucemcqueen5395]

Thanks for holding to the truth.

[@betsieswartz]

This is the opposite of truth

[@sgt.grinch3299]

Imagine that.

[@hglundahl]

3:21 Denisovan genome is also only present in trace amounts in "modern" man ... Also last purebred ones from c. 40 000 BP, also pointing to same carbon date for the Flood. Pääbo tested their genome as pretty close to "far older" genome of Antecessor in Atapuerca (I obviously don't believe the "far older" part), and it was already known the Antecessor was morphologically close to Heidelbergians, for which there is no genetic testing. My hunch is : Denisovan = Antecessor = Heidelbergian. Like Neanderthals a pre-Flood race, and using the word losely, not meant to contradict "one blood, one race" ...

[@betsieswartz]

This is incoherent garbage

[@settledown444]

@@betsieswartz It is pretty funny though. This science maven used the Bible to "calibrate" 14C dates so he can say 14C dates support his literal Genesis claims. 😄

[@charrin9086]

It's just that there are so many fascinating aspects to these discussions- and new questions and discoveries add fuel to the fire of both camps. I do admit to having questions about the hundreds of millions / billions arguments though. Lately I cant wrap my head around: Moon laser measurements say the moon is moving away from the earth at a rate of 3.78 CM per year. Multiply that by a Billion. or two. A moon that close to the earth a million years ago would present a problem? How about a billion? What about the collagen and hemoglobin found in dinosaur bones? What about depictions of dinosaurs in carvings, pottery, etc? I guess one thing that does not work for me is uniformitarianism- many of our assumptions about constants must not be correct.

[@settledown444]

The moon's recession is caused by tidal drag of the Earth's oceans against the continents. Earth's continents have been moving and being rearranged over the last 4 billion years by plate tectonics. The current recession rate of 3.78 cm/yr is not constant but has varied greatly over time as the continents shifted. If you do the math and calculate the historic recession rate it comes out to average a bit less than 2 cm/yr. At that average rate the moon was formed approx. 4.5 billion years ago exactly in line with the radiometric data. The tiny amount of original organics found in dinosaur fossils were permineralized. A mechanism has been identified which allowed for their preservation by having their proteins cross-linked with iron molecules. The finds were really amazing but do nothing to cast any doubt on the age of the specimens. Humans have drawn lots of imagined creatures on pottery, cave walls, etc. A few of them superficially resemble known dinosaurs. Most of them don't but the creationists will never talk about those.

[@charrin9086]

Uniformitarianism can be an inconvenient thing- those dating systems that give the age of objects use the assumption of constant decay (which is an unobserved assumption), but when the subject of lunar recession comes up, everyone scrambles to say that this recession is not constant and must vary, obviously because of the implications of 3.8CM of annual recession and its cataclysmic implications on the earth over even millions of years. Much less billions. The Dino art is real, and what was depicted by the ancients is clear- they were depicting what they saw. Inconvenient facts- we all have much to learn. Most of all me. @@settledown444

[@settledown444]

@@charrin9086 Radiometric decay rates have not been observed to change as long as we have been studying them. Certainly not by the 5 orders of magnitude required by YEC claims. There is also ample evidence they remained the same as far back in Earth's history as we can tell through indirect methods. Therefore it is not wrong to assume they have remained constant. The "bad assumptions" is one of the lamest in a whole stable of creationist lame excuses.

[@settledown444]

@@charrin9086 I gave you the correct scientific explanation about lunar recession and how it has varied over time due to continental movement. Anyone seriously interested can find published scientific papers with the data confirming what I just said. Sadly it's incredibly rare to find a creationist willing to actually do any real research and learn the actual science before popping off.

[@charrin9086]

Mount St. Helens rock cap measured at 350,000 years. This cap was the result of the 1980's eruption.@@settledown444

[@dalea4350]

I would love to know their calculation method of "Millions" of years.

[@katamas832]

Study radiometric dating?

[@Laughingatsciencedeniers]

You could easily find out in just a few seconds, but you're not really interested. At least not unless it comes from apologist sources, which isn't in any way representative of science.

[@28Cryptic743]

is the dinosaur that they are trying to say has feathers the one that a person had found two different fossils, one that was a dinosaur and one that was a bird and glued them together and tried to pass it off as a complete skeleton? I had heard that National Geographic had done an article on that but later when they realized (or acknowledged) that it was two different fossils glued together they put a retraction in, that probably only a few ever read, but I have heard this theory become very popular since that article came out

[@roydodds3693]

No

[@settledown444]

There are at least 60 different species of dinosaur which have been identified as having feathers. The one example you cite was a Chinese scammer trying to cash in on the new scientific finds. The scam was discovered by a Chinese paleontologist and that particular specimen was removed. The scam didn't affect the veracity of all the other finds at all.

[@betsieswartz]

What is this conspiracy theory stuff? Find a reliable source that can say that every single piece of evidence for feathered dinosaurs is fake. You can’t, because you’re wrong and you know it. Shut up.

[@nuke_man_ai]

Whats your source? Mcdonalds?😂

[@debblouin]

@@nuke_man_aiwhy are you being rude

[@midgetydeath]

Velociraptors, for example, were feathered and would benefit massively from being able to glide a short distance.

[@hglundahl]

2:36 _"Cooking a range of meats, including goat, deer, and horses on a hearth that rarely moved out of position, it was clear fire was a central part of everyday Neanderthal life at Gruta da Oliveira."_ Hmmm .... were they vegetarians with very rare meat eating, or were they cannibals? Or were those in Gruta da Oliveira precursors of Genesis 9:2?

[@samuelrodriguez9199]

Great content AIG. Keep it up!

[@betsieswartz]

If by great you mean false I completely agree

[@ColtJustice]

@@betsieswartz Show us your proof that it's false. Making assertions that can't be proven is just trolling. You're watching evidence contrary to your beliefs. Either watch and learn, or troll someplace else.

[@betsieswartz]

@@ColtJustice Darwin’s theory and reasoning, observable rapid evolution, the fossil record, and many more are proof of evolution.

[@ColtJustice]

@@betsieswartz Darwin, himself, admitted that his theory was wrong unless they could find the missing like between man and Ape. It's never been discovered, so it's just a false theory.

[@betsieswartz]

@@ColtJustice it’s not false, as there are other pieces of evidence that prove evolution and disprove creation.

[@sgt.grinch3299]

Birds of a feather flock together.

[@midgetydeath]

I like that no matter how long a day is to God, it still is the same story of what happened. And remember that, I think Saint Peter, had pointed out that a day to God is a long time to humans.

[@v1e1r1g1e1]

There are people who know how to use the Scientific Method - and are aware of its limitations and pitfalls - and there are those who think that ALL knowledge is only Materialism. Sadly, those who commit the error of asserting Materialism (positivistic reductionism) as the only method of having ''knowledge'' often conflate this error with the practice of the Scientific Method.

[@razark9]

Because science only has the capacity to study the natural world, the physical universe lol. So yeah, all science is materialistic. And what specific pitfalls do you see with the scientific method? Perhaps you should be telling that to all the actual scientists? You're reaching and pleading so bad for religious ideology to be science, but just let it go. You can actually believe in the supernatural *AND* understand science, but you're not going to overturn all of science by essentially going ''nuh-uh!''.

[@gerardmoloney433]

​​​@@razark9 You are totally confused about science. Science does nothing. Scientists on the other hand can and do tell lies. You are obviously not aware that the scientific method came from the Bible. Put everything to the test and hold fast to that which is good. This is an instruction to EVERYONE. So we are all supposed to be scientists thinking for ourselves! Stop listening to Atheist scientists, because by their own admission, they are not intelligently designed. Would you trust a computer that wasn't intelligently designed? God stated, the heavens DECLARE THE GLORY OF GOD. Scientists must follow the scientific method. Note: science does nothing! Scientists USE THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD GIVEN BY GOD. They are supposed to hold fast to that which is good. Truth is good lies are bad! Scientists tell those who don't think for themselves, what they want to believe, not what the scientific method shows to be the right conclusions and direction to follow where the evidence leads. Scientific evidence points to a causal agent outside of energy, matter, space and time for the creation of any universe like ours! That's what the latest Spacetime Theorems confirm. The Bible stated that thousands of years ago. And all scientific and archaeological discoveries are proving the accuracy of the Bible on a monthly basis in our lifetime! So that evidence points to the Bible! Why aren't the SCIENTISTS following the evidence? Just because they don't doesn't mean you shouldn't. You are supposed to think for yourself as the Bible instructs everyone to do. Maranatha

[@FlyingSpaghettiJesus]

@@gerardmoloney433 Science does nothing? _The Creationist Conundrum_ I accept science when it provides me with safe clean drinking water, sanitation, food in abundance, electricity, computers, evidence based medicine, every day comforts, modern transportation systems etc... But I automatically reject any science which contradicts my deeply held beliefs, hurts my feelings and exposes the fact that I’m a gullible a fool who has been brainwashed and manipulated into believing on faith and against reason in Iron-age fairytales composed by scientifically illiterate authors are real. Because we all came from dirt and 6000 years of incest! Be harder to trick

[@FPSIreland2]

​@@FlyingSpaghettiJesusiron age? Mate, try the bronze age 😂 those stories are from like 2000BC in most cases, the iron age woukdnt arrive to europe for another thousand years if i recall correctly

[@FlyingSpaghettiJesus]

@@FPSIreland2 The vast majority of the Old Testament was written during the Iron Age (1200 BC - 500 BC) and the entire New Testament was written in the 1st Century AD and entirely postdates both the periods referred to as the Bronze Age and the Iron Age. Look it up and learn.

[@betsieswartz]

No we didn’t? The theory of evolution has had more or less stayed the same over the years, including the part about it being fact.

[@settledown444]

Any time a new discovery changes our understanding of some small detail in evolution creationists always jump and down and scream *ALL OF EVOLUTION MUST BE WRONG!!!* They just can't help themselves. 🙂

[@betsieswartz]

Always have, always will

[@kevinjohnson3521]

@@betsieswartz alligators not “evolving” proves evolution is a fraud! If animals evolved, they all must evolved. You cannot cherry pick. Evolution is built an assumptions (guesses) & unprovable mathematical equations! Prove me wrong?!?!

[@settledown444]

@@kevinjohnson3521 What makes you think alligators haven't evolved over time? Extant alligators are similar but not identical to their fossilized ancestors.

[@kevinjohnson3521]

@@settledown444 that is all you need to consider it proof… what a non-scientific fool you truly are… at least we now know why you settle down for lies… gullible person are you! You provided no proof, just another “scientific fairytale” guess!!!! 🤪

[@justanotheropinion5832]

AiG is always good for a laugh. Can’t wait to see how they spin this one.

[@shanehenderson8756]

So you think Neanderthals are what ?

[@justanotheropinion5832]

@@shanehenderson8756 a separate (brain pan, skeletal structure, genetic makeup) species of hominid. Aka one of the links that christians promised didn’t exist and said disprove evolution, but are now scrambling to move the goalpost.

[@kingyoung5228]

​@@justanotheropinion5832what are you talking about it doesn't exist because there isn't a different species not that we have to move a goal post when one doesn't exist evolutionist are still at the beginning part of their theory If I ask you where the first self-replicating thing came from you couldn't give me a direct answer you'd instead have to go on and on about how that's technically not evolution and well when you have to argue semantics you've already lost, either way it's nice to talk about Neanderthals and all but with your current theory we can't even get that far I'm not sure why creationist humor you all so much when we can dismantle all of your BS right before it even starts it's laughable really. Oh and by the way the genetic differences you listed would be an expected result given biblical chronology. For example certain parts of the skull dont stop growing according to the Bible people lived to be 5-6-7-800 years old if true we should find evidence and we do with these elongated skulls of course your interpretation is different because you're underlying assumption is different. They were humans formed complex social interactions, buried their dead, used tools, played musical instruments etc. the differences In anatomy can be explained away by the environments they lived in and also perhaps even the age they lived to be there's nothing so drastic as to conclude it's a different kind of humanoid species altogether that is absurd. Didn't scientist confuse a baboon leg bone as being a part of Lucy which was the poster child or ape I should say for evolution. It is always you atheist who are scrambling to correct your hilarious mistakes not us. Your scientists confused part of a Whales mating system for vestigial legs My point is you guys have a history of being wrong about functions of organs in organisms we can't observe and yet you think you can accurately list fossil transitions and determine separate species based on a fossil that's been in the ground for thousands of years again another hilarious conclusion to make.

[@Shoerandomcanoe]

@@kingyoung5228 ⁠I would tell you that abiogenesis provides several viable theories. I would also tell you to look into scientific fields like systems chemistry. It’s pretty difficult to explain in a comment that is why scientists publish entire papers. Creationists can’t dismantle anything, the best you can do is make outrageous claims about events that by definition can never be demonstrated, tested, or explained with the occasional swing at some cherry picked data point. No that wasn’t the Lucy controversy, creationists got caught blatantly lying. It is true that science makes mistakes sometimes, the difference is the mistake is always discovered and exposed by other scientists. I think those are the big points but I’d be happy to go into more detail if I forgot something. Oh and last thing your religion has a history of being wrong about a lot more than science so I’m not really sure if you want to open that door.

[@kingyoung5228]

@Shoerandomcanoe I have to tell you, you’re pretty uninformed. Abiogenesis has been disproven since the 1800s, and that’s basic information. Life does not and can not arise from spontaneous combustion. I’d advise you to look up Louis Pasteur and his theory of biogenesis. Also, refrain from using absolutes; you have no idea what we as creationists can disprove, as you don’t understand any arguments postulated by creation scientists. Everything you think you know has already been debunked. Evolution and the Big Bang are both laughable at best and completely dismissible at worst. I don't know what's worse the fact you believe in abiogenesis in the modern era or the fact you're still so brainwashed to believe a knuckle walking tree swinging ape that died after it fell from a tree was close to making the transition into being human and all this even though, we know scientists can't accurately determine transitional forms in fossils. They misclassify them all the time, even in organisms, which we can directly observe. Whales are the most well-known example. Do me a favor and read a paper written sometime this decade. "Making outrageous claims that can't be proven." Oh, as opposed to life coming from, what's akin to a rock? Yea, don't live in a glass house and throw stones.

[@lgrantnelson2863]

Had a science teacher that looked like the depiction of the Neanderthal only he stood upright. People in the human race have many different appearances.

[@nasonguy]

LOL. Y'all are something else. This has been common knowledge for decades now. Good on you for catching up to 1990's scientific findings.

[@sciencerules8525]

Creationists asymptotically approaching the 21st century. 🙂

[@nasonguy]

@@sciencerules8525 They always catch up eventually. Usually once the evidence is so undeniably overwhelming, unambiguous, and clear, that they just can't avoid it. Well, at least a vast majority of them do. You always have the AiG goofballs that insist on the head-in-sand approach.

[@JungleJargon]

No kidding. It's the Eurasians that have the most Neanderthal DNA. Duh, they are not the precursors to Africans. Denisovans are also a mix of Sinites (D Yhg) and Nimrod (C Yhg) with Eurasians. It shows up on genetic "heat maps".

[@globalcoupledances]

Neanderthals were the first out-of-africans. Sapiens came second

[@JungleJargon]

@@globalcoupledances Neanderthals are not from Africa. Africans are not from Africa. Some of them moved into Africa and they are the younger of the other two lineages of Eurasians in Europe and Asia and the Semitics in Mesopotamia.

[@globalcoupledances]

@@JungleJargon First out-of africa was Homo Erectus. I consider Neanderthal as descended from Homo Erectus

[@SeaScienceFilmLabs]

@@JungleJargon Jungle! 👋 👍

[@JungleJargon]

@@SeaScienceFilmLabs Hello Sea Science!

[@user-nt6cs5lg6d]

Go figure! Naturalists lying about evolution. Never heard of such a thing. Lol

[@markduell2468]

How old is the earth?

[@user-nt6cs5lg6d]

@@markduell2468 not as old as you guys claim. Lie #2.

[@settledown444]

The folks in this video aren't Naturalists.

[@markduell2468]

@@user-nt6cs5lg6d So, how old is it?

[@sciencerules8525]

@@user-nt6cs5lg6d What scientific evidence establishes an age for the Earth, with error ranges?

[@GhostBearCommander]

What I always wanna know is, how do they gather so much “history” and other information from bones alone? Think about it. Only a small portion of an animals genetic code contributes to the formation of it’s skeleton. The vast majority of pertinent information we need on most beasts is in the soft, rotted flesh and blood. Furthermore, many fossils are incomplete, and many are inconsistent with evolutionary theory (the Cambrian explosion is a perfect example). Sure, we can glean a good portion about of data from fossils. But to make the claims Evolutionists make, we’d need a much, MUCH more bountiful data set to work with.

[@globalcoupledances]

Phylogenetical trees

[@astinscience]

If we are examining actual bone, as is the case with Neaderthal remains, we can extract DNA from cell remains in the bones themselves. Any surviving (partial or otherwise) nucleus would contain the genome of the entire individual, so we can get pretty complete sequences from relatively recent remains. Just an FYI, the Cambrian Explosion is not at all inconsistent with evolutionary theory; indeed it seems to demonstrate strong selection pressures in an "arms race" sort of situation causing relatively fast changes in populations (relatively fast; the time period covered by the Cambrian Explosion is about 20+ million years).

[@PhyllisienneBrincat]

God bless you and thank you for all this information ❤

[@hongotedesco8931]

And? That's how science works. The more we discover, it can change what we previously thought. Taxonomic arrangement of species is particularly difficult, since the vast majority of species are extinct. But no, this whole "we have to go back to the bible...", not for scientific conclusions. Let science figure out how the universe works, don't be blinded by some ancient tome written 2k years ago...please.

[@ferratilis]

Once again the reality of creationism is proven to be right, over the imaginary Darwin fairy tales.

[@Gary-fq8cx]

What evidence do you have to show our species came from dirt via magic?

[@Jim-P]

⁠​⁠@@Gary-fq8cxNo they came from soup via magic 😂

[@aaronadamson7463]

@Jim-P no they came from soup by winning the craziest lottery ever! I mean you think the Powerball is hard to win, try randomly assembling the proper proteins, cell walls, and other minimum required parts together in under 4 hours by random chance!

[@Jim-P]

@@aaronadamson7463I’d say picking lottery numbers and cell formation is a false comparison, that the complexity of a living cell randomly forming in 4 hours is impossible without some kind of engineering or intelligence involved. Not to mention imaginary evolution of said cells giving rise to all creatures over time, not only humans.

[@Gary-fq8cx]

@@aaronadamson7463 You are absolutely correct. That's why no one says or believes your soup story. And no one says anything is random. We do know that our race wasn't created by a god via magic though. 😂

[@user-ze7yy9iz1f]

It's kind of confusing though, because of Thier narrative that ,kind of,, the necessity to fly, that some species of dinosaurs covers themselves with feathers and at the same time shrinks themselves gradually to compensate for the characteristics necessary for flight.,when we see the crocodiles that could be considered as one of these dinosaur-like species still lives most of their lives in water and adapts to these kind of environment,barely had the necessities for their bodily autonomy to gradually develop the hands and feet like that of a platipus and a tail that of a shark to adapt fo the waters.

[@brunobastos5533]

They are a different species , and science don change narratives , science keep looking for more answers unlike creationists that need to fit what science find to agree with their views

[@SeaScienceFilmLabs]

Great info, Guys! Keep up the great Work! More Human Evolution Narrative Destruction!!! Let’s Gooo!!!

[@millennialpoes5674]

All this info does is reinforce you and your religious kin's total and utter lack of understanding of the natural world.

[@nothing-om6fn]

This did nothing to destroy the theory of evolution, all it did was show that neanderthals were a tad bit smarter than we thought and that some dinosaur feathers were a tad bit more similar to birds than we thought.

[@SeaScienceFilmLabs]

@@nothing-om6fn I disagree. You’re just attempting to deflect. The fact is, Evidence for the Human Evolution narrative is lacking at best.

[@nothing-om6fn]

@@SeaScienceFilmLabs I'm all ears if you can provide a better explanation as to why the fossils have been steadily changing throughout the years. Or why we share so many retrovirus DNA with other primates.

[@SeaScienceFilmLabs]

@@nothing-om6fn _“why the fossils have been steadily changing throughout the years…”_ ~Nothing-om6fn {2023} “Changing Fossils?” 🤣 Where have “Fossils been steadily changing?” Your imagination? 🤣

[@Leadlight280]

Good, knowledge progresses, unlike ancient books.

[@Ledinosour673]

well said man, rise up evolutionist comrades! :D

[@mrliberty8468]

It's more of a paradox than a theory based on science.

[@storytellersharonkirkclift6399]

I love this channel and am a regular listener, but I wish it were possible to turn up the volume. Other KZbin channels are fine, but this channel is low.

[@kevinrtres]

I don't have a problem - max vol works just fine for me. Just make sure your volume setting on the u-tub video controls is set to max. That's the 3rd one on the bottom left of the screen.

[@storytellersharonkirkclift6399]

@@kevinrtres LOL! I'm having a "Duh!" moment here because you nailed it. I have no idea why I didn't think to check that little detail. I knew the computer's sound was on max. Thank you!

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

You mean science changes in light of new discoveries and new information? You mean scientists are not afraid to be wrong, and often update scientific theories when new knowledge is acquired? Wow.

[@zerosteel0123]

Judging from everything else they are wrong on, not surprised that they are way off on this. 😂😂😂

[@malibudolphin3109]

You obviously watch CNN and Fox.

[@zerosteel0123]

@@malibudolphin3109 obviously!

[@razark9]

@@zerosteel0123 And let me guess. All the things ''they're wrong on'' just happens to be in places where you're already desperate to give magic credit, right?

[@zerosteel0123]

@@razark9 well, you're wrong on nearly everything so I could say that.

[@razark9]

@@zerosteel0123 You crazies say a lot of things, doesn't make any of it true. Actually, you people practically always say stuff that isn't corroborated by any evidence or just blatantly untrue. Nobody sane should take ANY WORDS from you people as fact without at the very least looking it up to verify. When are any of you going to provide the evidence that'll change all of science as opposed to just lying about it for Jesus?

[@DerbyJackMusic]

Back in school or indoctrination stations, l remember being told that evolution took millions of years but we never see the change when finding specimens because it happened too quickly!😅

[@PepsighCO]

Hey! I hope you're having a good day. I want to chime in and suggest you look up "transitional species" and "vestigial structures" To keep it short though we do see evolution happen in the fossil record and even in living animals today, whales have (I believe it was) pelvic bones which are vestigial structures from evolution, they do use them during the breeding process but being a vestigial structure simply means it no longer works for the original function it had. Pelvic bones help us walk, aside from Pearl from Spongebob I have certainly never seen a walking whale!! There'a a lot that's progressed in science, including biology/evolution, so maybe it would be worth revisiting some of your issues with it and seeing if you can't understand it a bit better?

[@thehumblepotatoreborn9313]

*"which are vestigial structures from evolution, they do use them during the breeding process"* If whales still use then by definition they are not vestigial

[@DerbyJackMusic]

@@thehumblepotatoreborn9313 So possessed with evolution!!!! Satan has done a great job with the scientism lie!

[@96427]

​@@DerbyJackMusicWhat does Satan have to do with science?

[@DerbyJackMusic]

@@96427 You do not even see the ignorance of your question. This is the state of the woke, the unsaved, human monkey population, man believes in himself and yet all the toys and science are destroying this world!

[@mr.frederickson329]

Very interesting to see Creationists try to justify their belief systems. We don't know anything for certain. One can believe in God and creation, but also believe in God using evolution and a longer time frame than creationists want to allow for. It is called Cognitive Dissonance no matter what one believes, but the Ken Ham crowd is just too odd to take seriously.

[@betsieswartz]

I never thought there could be a worse news source than FOX, but I’ve found it.

[@settledown444]

Places like this, CMI, ICR etc. should carry a disclaimer FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY. This is about as far from accurate science reporting as it gets. 🙂

[@betsieswartz]

@@settledown444 said it better than I ever could have.

[@Laughingatsciencedeniers]

There's nobody more disingenuous than your common apologist.

[@jeremyramsey8804]

Evolve Latin meaning to unroll of unravel. Meaning the more that is unrolled the less one has. Completely stupid theory that flies in the face of the law of entropy.

[@settledown444]

_that flies in the face of the law of entropy._ How so? I bet you understand thermodynamics even less than you understand evolution. 🙂

[@LCKnecht]

​@@settledown444Seems you're the one that understands less than you think. Entropy either affects all natural systems, or none at all. Evolution describes increasingly more complex and varied systems over time, completely contrary to entropy. So which do you refute? Evolution or thermodynamics?

[@settledown444]

@@LCKnecht You didn't explain how evolution violates any laws of entropy. As I suspected you're one more creationist clueless on the topic.

[@jeremyramsey8804]

@settledown444 Because everything is running down going from order to disorder which goes against evolutions basic teaching of "bigger and better" osirvivla of the fittest or whatever.

[@settledown444]

@@jeremyramsey8804 Major FAIL there. The 2LoT actually says (simplified version) in a closed system the overall entropy (a measure of the disorder of a system) tends to increase. Two big problems: 1. There's nothing in the 2LoT which prevents natural processes from *locally* reducing entropy (i.e creating more ordered things) as long as the *overall* system entropy still increases. We see this happening in endothermic chemical reactions where external energy makes complex molecules by combining simpler molecules. Photosynthesis which powers virtually all life is an endothermic chemical reaction. 2.The Earth isn't a closed system. There's this thing called *the sun* supplying the Earth with an incredibly huge amount of external energy every second and has been for billions of years. The entropy of the Sun/Earth system is slowly increasing but the huge amount of energy from the sun powers the evolution of more complex life on Earth with plenty to spare.

[@timothyhelm437]

We need to stand on Gods Word. Amen!

[@Hunts_with_Bow_Original]

I'm a Christian and believe in evolution. Not the evolution that most people think of when they hear that word, but evolution as it exists in reality and truth. Evolution is one word that is used to simply describe multiple words and occurrences; change, advancement, adaptation, growth, etc. Putting the term "evolution" in that context we can definitively say we have evolved as a species since our creation. Furthermore, evolution isn't limited to the physical aspect, but also the emotional, mental and spiritual as well. Lastly, I don't believe the dinosaurs roamed the earth at the same time as mankind. I don't believe we would have survived. Nevertheless, I think it is quite probable that God destroyed the dinosaurs as needed in order to create us.

[@fohrum4757]

Changing your opinion in light of new evidence is a GOOD thing. It's something a Creationist will never understand. Refusing to change your opinion based on new evidence is ignorant, and is exactly how a Creationist operates. I know this mindset, because I was like that.

[@aaronadamson7463]

Just because you were like that doesn't mean the rest of us are. I change my mind all the time when I am shown to be wrong. Especially concerning Scripture. If I misunderstood something in scripture and can be shown that I was wrong, from scripture, I will gladly change my views. However, evolutionists continually change because they are continually proven wrong about things time and time again. Yet they expect us to blindly accept their take on things despite this track record. In 20 years, the "theories" that are being pushed today will be dismissed as proven wrong, science is constantly changing. So why should I believe something that will ultimately be shown to be wrong again down the line, over something timeless?

[@kenneth9874]

Whomever believes in nothing will fall for anything

[@fohrum4757]

@@kenneth9874 That's the exact opposite of what I observe every day. There is a huge correlation between conspiratorial thinking and a belief in a supernatural being.

[@kenneth9874]

@@fohrum4757 maybe it's just your flawed perception

[@fohrum4757]

@@kenneth9874 No, it's literally just statistics based on actual data haha. The correlation between religiosity and conspiratorial thinking is definitely there. Obviously not every believer is like that, and obviously some Atheists believe in silly conspiracies, but in general? Absolutely a correlation. Here's some examples for you: belief in supernatural things such as: ghosts, mind readers, tarot cards, and mediums. Climate change denial, moon landing denial, denial of both evolution and Big bang, general science denial, thinking the Earth is only 6000 years old, Illuminati, flat earth, distrust of government or authority (unless it's a person of authority that shares the same beliefs in god, and not just any god, but their exact god that they picked out of many hundreds of gods to worship)

[@MarkJones-fw3mo]

I'll go with the scientist over a 4000 year old bunch of sheep herders.

[@temporary4384]

Neanderthals are hominids and birds are dinosaurs whats so hard to grasp no magic needed😊

[@sonofglory7029]

I dont think people understand how complex and much of miracle it is for things to just come together in our reality if you did you wouldn't believe in evolution.

[@user-xs2ln9fv7l]

Instead of "designed for life" how about life developed to fit the environment it found itself in.

[@sonofglory7029]

@@user-xs2ln9fv7l how did life get here and how would it know what it needed

[@razark9]

There's no such thing as an ''evolutionist''. There are people who understand and/or accept science and *then* there are flat earthers and creationists who don't and cling to their ignorance at all cost.

[@v1e1r1g1e1]

You might want to tell that to all those ''scientists'' who call themselves ''evolutionists''. If one wants to be accurate, it would be better if one were to say ''There are people who know how to use the Scientific Method - and are aware of its limitations and pitfalls - and there are those who think that ALL knowledge is only Materialism. Sadly, those who commit the error of asserting Materialism (positivistic reductionism) often conflate their error with the practice of the Scientific Method.''

[@razark9]

@@v1e1r1g1e1 I don't know of anyone who refer to themselves as or identify as an ''evolutionist'' outside the specific context of explaining science to you guys. It's extremely misleading and you people specifically use the term to make it sound like this fringe, unsupported and alternative ''belief'' when it's actually one of the most supported scientific theories in the history of science and despite it being perfectly possible to both understand science and be a christian at the same time. It's used to deliberately mislead christians into a false dilemma and to ''discredit'' scientific consensus without actually doing anything. You wouldn't refer to someone who accepts germ theory as a ''Germist'' or atom theory for ''atomist'', and referring to someone as an ''evolutionist'' is just as silly.

[@razark9]

@@v1e1r1g1e1 As for materialism there's no other ways for science to operate. Science is specifically the study of the natural world and physical universe. It literally cannot study or test the supernatural, corporeal or the ''outside-universe'' realms in any way, shape or form. So yeah, science is by necessity materialistic as science cannot interact with or study ''phenomenon'' outside of the physical universe lol.

[@FlyingSpaghettiJesus]

@@v1e1r1g1e1 Lets put your hand waving to the test. Name one Biologist that is on record calling themselves a "evolutionist“. Take all the time you need, I’ll wait.

[@katamas832]

The idea that Neanderthals were brutish ape-man has been abandoned for decades now, but sure let's pretend this is something they just recently were "forced" to change. Even though we know them exclusively as our closest relatives, and were pretty much our equals. They were fully human, just not homo-sapiens.

[@the_neanderthal09]

exactly!

[@sandorrabe5745]

?????? Fully human but not Homo Sapiens? What do you mean with that? If they are fully human they descent from adam, then where does the homo sapiens/non homo sapiens distinction come from? You made that up yourself?

[@sliglusamelius8578]

Abandoned by whom? And how interested were evolutionary theorists in disseminating that information that they really knew the truth? Nobody can state ipso facto that Neanderthals were NOT Homo sapiens. They very well could have been, and likely were. So “the evolutionists” make up the idea of a subspecies designation. What exactly is a subspecies designation as far as the debate over evolution? It’s vapid.

[@kevinrtres]

Of course - science evolves as per evolution - so truth will never exist in that worldview.

[@katamas832]

@@kevinrtres Science always evolves. That's the thing about science. If by truth you mean "100% certain, undeniable" no, you'll never get that from science. Those who promise you that are scamming you. We humans are limited, so none of us can have "truth". Those who believe they do are delusional. What we can have is very reasonable certainity about reality.

[@josephreigens3090]

Amen AIG. THANKS

[@raebertgrayson5766]

It would be more accurate to say that God works through natural laws/means; however, it is *mankind* that does not understand how those natural laws/means really opperate.

[@Censoredbyyourcult]

God is dead. Science killed him, and creationists are desperately trying to put him back togheter and I'm here for it.

[@Sevenp3]

Science doesn't disprove nor discredit God but actually affirms it.

[@FlyingSpaghettiJesus]

@@Sevenp3 Present this science and then collect your Nobel Prize 😂

[@Censoredbyyourcult]

@@Sevenp3 As I said. Desperate.

[@razark9]

You cannot be a creationist without being scientifically illiterate, a liar or both.

[@hglundahl]

8:24 Someone is getting good sleep, good food and generally a pretty decent life. Someone is _always_ coming up with a pun ....

[@list1726]

Thanks for posting

[@LawrenceCaldwellAuthor]

Well, it's very important for Atheists to defend the fairy tale of evolution. It is their creation myth after all. 😏

[@amirparsi4165]

Talking snakes and donkeys are fairytales, not the science that biology is based on.

[@aaronadamson7463]

The whole point of the talking donkey was that that's not normal. It wouldn't be noteworthy if it wasn't some clear miracle. But atheists cannot allow any room for the metaphysical, otherwise their whole belief system collapses

[@billcook4768]

Somebody has been feeding you lies. Evolution isn’t a creation story.

[@LawrenceCaldwellAuthor]

@@amirparsi4165DNA science proves upward evolution is impossible. Your faith in Evolution is a religion.

[@LawrenceCaldwellAuthor]

@@billcook4768 Oh, it sure is.

[@billcook4768]

Scientists: When we get new evidence we change our theories AiG: No matter what evidence piles up, we will never change our theories.

[@wgterry73ify]

That's because they don't have too, the Bible is 100% true.

[@Vernon-Chitlen]

There's plenty of evidence "warm little ponds" or whatever support the chemistry required for a single protein or gene to form. Nobody can "make carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, hydrogen, sulfur and phosphorus form a single protein or gene, even separating these 6 which account for 97% of what living things are made of from the other elements. How absurd and still claiming that all 98 elements bumping around in a sterile pool of 1.5 sextillion molecules per drop, arranging themselves into a cell capable of evolving. Romans 1:18-22 describes those believing in a natural origin of life. Psalm 139:14 I will praise You, for I am fearfully and wonderfully; marvelous are Your works and that my soul knows very well. All 37 trillion cells in my body bearing witness to Him.

[@LumbridgeTeleport]

Also new evidence destroys the theory of evolution and scientist still refuse to change the theory..

[@markduell2468]

@@wgterry73ifyHow do you know the Bible is 100% true?

[@johnglad5]

​@@markduell2468The truth in it has stood the test of time.

[@Barbutt]

2:41 In typical fashion for the Secular Paradigm Believers who don’t allow another view… often calling it pseudo science.. they can’t just say they ARE HUMAN. (Looking forward to my next debate with the folks who don’t even watch these clips. They have very strong faith considering what it’s based on… Evolution Fan Art and Fan Fiction.)

[@PepsighCO]

Actually evolution isn't based on fan art or fan fiction, we have numerous fossils that show evolution and the deeper into the fossil record we go the more simple the organisms get. Transitional species and vestigial structures are proven, even whales have a pelvic bone left over from evolution. It's really cool to see living examples and if you really dig into evolution i think you'll find solid evidence for it.

[@Freddy-Da-Freeloadah]

If Adam and Noah lived 900 years, they probably had a much stronger bone structure: LIKE A NEANDERTHAL!! IMHO

[@connorlambert]

science: we're learning more all the time! christians: some book says a thing!

[@Jim-P]

Evolution is science fiction, taught from a book that says a thing. Neanderthal was fully human, evolution was wrong.

[@RealHooksy]

It’s funny how you try to use your religion to debunk science. Hilarious 😂

[@jwonderfulsuccess]

I believe some dinosuars did have feathers and its a fun thought. Who's to say they didn't. And yes I believe in creation and the Bible. 🕊

[@astinscience]

We actually have good fossil evidence for feathered dinosaurs, though these feathers weren't flight feathers. Feathers first evolved as a downy body covering that may have served either a display function, or thermoregulation, or both. But some were definitely feathered.

[@jwonderfulsuccess]

​@@astinscienceya and maybe some could've glided. They must have been beautiful with different colors and patterns. One day in the afterlife we'll see them 😊

[@stevemcclendon9297]

Also using fossils you can determine natural wear and tear vs wear and tear from motion of the the organism so yeah we can figure general behaviors from structure and wear of the fossils. And if im correct you guys infer behavior of fossilized creatures you have in your "museum".

[@ingela_injeela]

We never thought they were subhuman!

[@settledown444]

5:08 My word are these folks clueless. Not all dinosaurs evolved into birds. Birds evolved from a specific group of theropod dinosaurs called the maniraptorans around 150 MY. Birds and the non-avian dinosaurs then co-existed from that time until 66 MYA when the Chicxulub impact took out all the non-avian dinosaurs as well as most of the bird species. The bird species which survived then radiated into the extant birds we see now.

[@SeaScienceFilmLabs]

Settle down… 😅 Why so Emotionally Compromised? 🍏 lol!

[@sgt.grinch3299]

Can you show us the evolutionary process? Please start with their creation and show all the steps to today’s creatures. Thank you.

[@beastlycrawdad6412]

Radiation kills and mutates. Mutation isn’t evolution. So birds could not have been radiated into their current state. There is also no evidence that any kind of bird came or transitioned from a dinosaur.

[@settledown444]

@@sgt.grinch3299 Read _The Ancestor's Tale_ for a good layman's overview. Showing all the actual evidence would take years and several petabits of computer space.

[@LumbridgeTeleport]

Says you. You can’t prove anything 66million years ago lol.

[@hglundahl]

2:15 Post-Flood? No. Three lines of evidence go against that. 1) c. 30 % of the Neanderthal specifics survive in our genome, with 2 -- 4 % in typical non-African individuals; some parts are totally lacking, like the Y-chromosome and the mitochondria. This points to the genome surviving some bottleneck in a small population where only mixed-race Neanderthals, no purebred ones, were present. The most _obvious_ bottleneck there is would be the Ark; 2) Neanderthal dental calculus doesn't reveal any normal meat eaters. The ones in El Sidrón seem to be purely vegetarian. The ones in Belgium seem to be cannibals. Before the Flood, just people would not have eaten meat (except perhaps in connexion with sacrifice), and unjust people going to the extent of cannibalism seems pretty Genesis 6; 3) No Neanderthal either whole skeleta or body parts pass a carbon date of 40 000 BP. This has been the basis for my carbon date for the Flood, with Biblical and real date being 2957 BC according to Roman martyrology for Christmas day (Christ born 2957 after the Flood), but this corresponds to carbon dating into 40 000 BP. I have since changed this to 39 000 BC due to the tephra of the one supervolcano with carbon dates, Campi Flegrei. Supervolcanos would be a typical part of the Flood.

[@settledown444]

Wow. So radiocarbon dates of 40,000 YBP support a date of 2957 BC for the Flood. 🤣 You might want to think that claim through a bit more. Do you have the faintest clue how radiocarbon dating works or how it is calibrated against non-radiometric yearly proxies?

[@hglundahl]

Learn to read,@@settledown444! I didn't say "support" I basically said "correlate to" ... I have a pretty good idea on both how it works and what a calibration is, and this correlation is part of my Biblically dated calibration.

[@settledown444]

@@hglundahl Bull. Please describe how 14C dating works and how it is calibrated. You don't have the faintest clue on either.

[@hglundahl]

OK,@@settledown444 . There is a fixed very small fraction of the carbon present in the atmospheric CO2 and other carbon containing gasses of the atmosphere, which is not carbon 12, also not carbon 13, but carbon 14. That fraction mainly undergoes two types of changes which in the present era (or up to industrialism) tend to balance out, namely formation of C14 high up in the atmosphere and decay of C14 all over the atmosphere. If the content of C14 were totally constant, there would be no need for calibration, raw carbon dates would automatically equal real dates at least as soon as the correct halflife was figured out. As it is, carbon dates are checked against for instance tree rings. Now, these reveal, several real dates ranging 750 to 450 BC all tend to date to 550 BC. This means, the carbon 14 has been going down, after an initial level higher than "modern carbon" (corrected for pre-industrial levels). So, the carbon 14 level is not a real constant. My proposal is, Biblical events are at least as good as tree rings, once a certain part of archaeology can be tied to a certain part of the Biblical history. This also involves the vaccillations of level being more radical, and involving a post-Flood radical rise, which means several things dated by carbon get very inflated timelines.

[@settledown444]

@@hglundahl As I suspected you have no clue how actual 14C calibration is done. Historic 14C/12C ratios are determined and calibrated against dozens of yearly proxies, not just tree rings. Multiple dendrochronology sets going back to 12,000 YBP (not 750 BC, you pulled that from your posterior), lake varves, ice core samples, ocean core samples, speleothems, coral growth bands, etc. Current calibration goes back to *55,000 YBP* as determined by the INTCAL20 data sets. The problem with creationist morons and your pseudoscience happens when you run into someone actually knowledgeable and experienced with the techniques you're trying to bluff your way through. Then you look like a real fool as you do now.

[@Isaac-47517]

21:00- It doesn't take a rocket scientist ...

[@YeshuaisnotJesus]

Religion is pretending to know things you don't know. ------Aronra.

[@myfakeguuglaccount8307]

Sounds like "Science."

[@markduell2468]

@@myfakeguuglaccount8307 Do you understand how the scientific method works?

[@SK-bw2cv]

Aron Ra the satanist? Why would any Christian listen to him? 🤣

[@zt2max]

like the religion of materialism where you pretend things like abiogenesis and evolution are known to be fact when it's clear they're fiction.

[@buddy_132]

As knowledge increases, humanity continues to prove the Bible more and more right just like with the Neanderthals AKA humans.

[@-dirk-65]

The cooked egg analogy was new to this simple man. I believe God gave us His Word & why would HE lie.

[@urso3000]

I love it’s 😊thanks for sharing 😊

[@betsieswartz]

God these people have the wrong views and can’t properly form grammatically correct sentences

[@betsieswartz]

It’s almost like science isn’t stagnant

[@Dulc3B00kbyBrant0n]

as time goes on we learn how wrong our previous assumptions were -secular scientists

[@ApelikeAltruism]

@@Dulc3B00kbyBrant0n It's not a virtue to never change your ideas.